The other thing I want to try to do is to establish a delegation system whereby we see each other’s specialist fields and then, if we think of a topic which we think is worth writing about, instead of writing it ourselves, we request the specialist of that field to write it instead. This will improve efficiency, since everyone will find it easiest to write about the topics that they have more experience with. This is essentially the part of the plan outlined on the main site:

Through developing familiarity with each other’s work, Aryanists are expected to establish specialist expertize in different areas of the subject matter and be able to mutually defer ongoing discourse with trust and respect.

http://aryanism.net/philosophy/

So this post will be all about what I would like each of you guys to write about sometime in the near future. Again, in no way is this just about me delegating to you; if you want to delegate stuff to me or to each other, that’s fine too.

To Miecz, who is nicely establishing himself as our entertainment media specialist, I wish to delegate a review of the movie “300″ and how it is ZC propaganda designed to promote racism and war with Iran.

To delendaestziobot, who has demonstrated ability in deconstructing enemy tactics, I wish to delegate an analysis of Kevin MacDonald as the main academic figure among BS Gentiles.

I have nothing specific for Elysium and OC on this occasion, in part because I think the three of us here on this blog have not yet agreed on what our own specialist fields are. What I hope will happen is either we each pick a field, or else we devote ourselves to taking up the slack wherever it appears. Ideas welcome.

By the way, we are still open for more Aryanist bloggers to help out in the propaganda war. If you believe in Unity Through Nobility and consider yourself able to fill in a topical gap that none of us are covering, or have useful technical skills to bring to the table, then please join in!

So now that the new blogs are off to an enthusiastic start, I must once again remind our allied bloggers of the importance of streamlined vocabulary. This is what distinguishes our propaganda from those of other groups: the rigour of our words. Any time I notice faults in this area, I will point them out. I also welcome criticism from you towards my use of words. Never have I claimed that my own use of words is perfect; what I am saying is that this is what all of us need to work on.

I am reading this post:

http://delendaestziobot.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/gentiles-fall-for-oliver-stones-cunning-ploy/

Naive Gentiles whom Jews Call “Goyim”

As I explained in my previous post, “Gentile” and “Goy” are distinct concepts. In fact, Gentiles have their own Goys. Also, naivety has nothing to do with whether or someone is a Goy. A Goy is anyone whose oppression is deemed acceptable amongst the oppressors. That is all the term means. It describes status, not characteristics.

Aryan Nobleman

This is repetition. “Aryan” means “noble”, therefore does not need another “noble” following it. The construction “Aryan Nobleman” might mislead readers to assume that “Aryan” means something other than “noble” (which is why only BS Gentiles call themselves “Aryan Noblemen”.) If you wish to exalt Hitler’s superiority, I suggest the term “Arhat” (Foe Destroyer) as given in the Glossary expressly for this purpose.

Also, a more general point is the need to distinguish between “Aryan” and “Aryanist”. Not all Aryans are Aryanists; there are plenty of people who live their own lives nobly, but who do not discuss politics – these are Aryans but not Aryanists. Using “Aryanist” when appropriate allows an extra level of precision. 

Moving on:

http://delendaestziobot.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/we-aryans-are-a-folk/

one nation need not suffer for the sake of another, one folk need not hinder the development of another folk!

While I fully support the sentiment against oppression, I refer to this page on the main site:

http://aryanism.net/philosophy/arya/tribalism-vs-universalism/

A key lie concering tribalism told by all nationalists, who are just tribalists seeking respectability (note that National Socialists are not nationalists, but folkists), is: “We can be for our own people without being against other people.” In a world of finite resources, it should be obvious why this is absolutely impossible.

We must be careful not to inadvertently repeat the nationalist lie. The only thing that will prevent one group from oppressing another in a world of finite resources is if every group agrees to decrease its own population so as to reduce their demand for resources faster than the rate at which resources are running out. Any group that claims to have no intent of oppressing others, yet does not: 1) reduce its population by controlling reproduction, and 2) demand that all other groups do the same, is LYING.

In other words, mere absence of a plan to oppress others in the process of collective self-preservation is not folkism. Folkism is the awareness that as long as collective self-preservation is valued as an end in itself, and not as the means to a moral purpose, we WILL END UP oppressing others sooner or later, whether we planned it or not. This is because life itself is war, and the only way to avoid war between groups is to divert the war against the evil within all groups. Unity Through Nobility necessarily means Unity Against Ignobility. (Starting with Jews and Gentiles.)

Let me clarify the use of the term “Gentile”. Firstly, it is not an alternative for the popular term “Sheeple”. Sheeple are the people who take no consequential action at all (and hence can be strategically disregarded, which is why I rarely even mention them). Gentiles are the people who take counterproductive action.

The term “Gentile” derives from the Latin “gentilis”, which means “belonging to a nation”. Gentile motives, interests and stakes are necessarily tribal, albeit without the extent of duplicity of Jews. Gentiles overlap with the group that David Myatt used to call ‘Homo Hubris’, characterized by what he called “arrogant aggression”, which I refer to as the hunter archetype.

“They [Homo Hubris] … have never been able to control, for very long, their primal instincts, their lack of respect for the numinous, and their innate bullying savagery, although they have managed, or rather connived, to convince themselves, and sometimes others, that they, and their ways, are somehow “civilized”.” – David Myatt

Many people use the terms “Gentile” and “Goy” interchangeably. This is sloppy, and I discourage it. “Goy” is a reminder of how Jews view us, namely as people outside of their circle of tribal altruism. It refers to the group’s  status of selected victimization, not to the characteristics of the group. Nor is it limited to use only when Jews are the oppressor. As I often say, in the eyes of humanists, non-humans are Goys. The Aryanist ideal is a world without Goys ie. without oppression.

“Gentile” is the term that describes the characteristics of the group. Gentiles are prone to manipulation (as opposed to the Sheeple, who are prone to passivity). We call this a slave personality. For example, anyone who prefers slavery to death is a Gentile, because whenever Jews want them as a group to do something, they can simply convince such people that they are in existential danger as a group if they do not do as required, and they will – every single time – do as required. The process is no different than how the Jewish medical industry sells us ‘healthcare products’ by scaring us with advertizements showing people with health problems. (The Sheeple continue eating Jewish-produced junk food. The Gentiles start buying Jewish-produced nutrition supplements.)

Gentiles, even those who complacently describe themselves as “Jew-wise”, are not on our side. They are the people who complain that there is a bomb inside the room, and then do everything they can to detonate it(!). Even if they (correctly) identify Jews for building the bomb, they themselves are the ones who will ultimately cause the explosion, indeed the ones on whom Jews are relying to cause the explosion – and take the fall for it when history is subsequently written. Gentiles are no less than the EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL ITSELF, the fabric whose existence enabled a bomb to be built in the first place. We call them Gentiles to distinguish them from Aryans who – while just as much Goys in the eyes of Jews – do not share this overriding reflex of self-preservation and thus will reject such Zionist manipulation. (Jews have a special name reserved for Aryans in their own language, which I will come to in another post.)

Many of the “Jew-wise” Gentiles with whom I have debated have advised me to educate myself on the Jewish goal by reading The Camp of the Saints. They never question why the originally French novel was translated into English – and hence made accessible to a much larger readership – by Norman Shapiro (Jew). In a nutshell: “Jew-wise” Gentiles promote to me a book that Jews promoted to them, telling me that the book reveals the Jewish goal. You cannot make this stuff up.

The Lord of the Rings is a far better story than The Camp of the Saints. In the past I have referred to Boromir as a Gentile specimen. Boromir considers himself rather heroic for his commitment to ‘his people’, which is why he kept trying to steal the Ring. This is the problem with Gentiles: it is extraordinarily difficult to convince them that they are part of the problem, even though it is blindingly obvious to everyone else watching. Would we trust Boromir to tell us how the Ring works? If not, then why should we trust Gentiles to tell us what Jews are doing? (Fun exercise for fence-sitters: every time you read a racist blog, imagine Boromir was the author. Then attempt to take the writings seriously.)

Aragorn to Boromir: “I will not lead the Ring within a hundred leagues of your city!”

In light of this, I have a new propaganda term to recommend: the Boromir Syndrome (BS). This is what we should use as often as possible to describe the mental condition of “Jew-wise” Gentiles every time they open their mouths. We can also apply this idea to graphics and video edits. In the same way as we’ve been superposing the Israeli flag on Alex Jones videos, we could start superposing Boromir’s face on David Duke videos!

There are ZC Gentiles (racist/Islamophobic, pro-Jewish). Then there are BS Gentiles (self-proclaimed “Jew-wise” and anti-Jewish, but remain racist/Islamophobic). In some ways, the latter are worse.

“… anti-Semitic only in outward appearance. And this was worse than if it had made no pretences at all to anti-Semitism; for the pretence gave rise to a false sense of security among people who believed that the enemy had been taken by the ears; but, as a matter of fact, the people themselves were being led by the nose. The Jew readily adjusted himself to this form of anti-Semitism and found its continuance more profitable to him than its abolition would be.” – Adolf Hitler

First of all, a belated welcome to Miecz Elizejski for starting an affiliated blog, which you can visit here:

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com

I also thank our regular positive commenters – Delendaestziobot, Julian, Colin, Longinus, and any others I might have missed - for your input here, but on top of this I would like to encourage you to start blogs of your own if you have not already done so. It is free, easy to set up, and will help to increase our online presence. If you post an article on your own blog which we find useful, we will mirror it here. Even more importantly, a blog of your own will also allow you to rebut our propaganda enemies without worrying about your comments getting deleted from their sites (which happens VERY often if you are a non-racist opponent of Jewish domination).

Try to find a special topic of your own that no one else is covering, so as to minimize content overlap. And try to use a common vocabulary, as on our Glossary page. And of course, use our slogan: Unity Through Nobility. For further details, please refer to this page:

http://aryanism.net/politics/upgrading-anti-zionism/

If you do start a blog, please post the link in a comment below this post so we know where you are. At a little over a year since the breakup of the OWNP, I look forward to being part of this newly rising Aryanist intellectual community.

“Is it blood? Blood is a common possession, but that has not prevented men who spoke one language to have been at loggerheads with each other for centuries. Is it our common economic interests? But that has not prevented the hardest struggles from taking place precisely in this sphere. Is it our history? We know it only too well: a sad tale of war and dissension. Is it religion which is common to us all? No, here too we have fought and disputed with each other … In the same way it is not common customs nor common usages. No, it is something quite different which not merely brings us to this community but even makes it inevitable. It is our common fate, that common fate which none can escape and which is the lot of all life upon this earth.” – Adolf Hitler 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZGK33rkk6E

Don’t forget to check out some of 91177info’s other videos:

http://www.youtube.com/user/91177info

Everyone is talking about the recent behaviour of the French police towards people sleeping on the street since being evicted from their council housing. In other words, Nicolas Sarkozy (Jew) apparently thinks it is time to test the ZC conditioning of the French public. The online response seems mixed so far. Many condemn the police brutality, but many others express pleasure in watching the video.

Among other points I have noticed from reading comments is how many people automatically (and incorrectly) assumed that the victims are illegal immigrants. This indicates that people are reaching the stage where they stop caring about getting the story straight. Facts are no longer as powerful a tool in the propaganda war as they were a few years ago.  Rhetoric is becoming more important. I recommend that everyone on our side develop our rhetorical arsenal at least as much as our factual arsenal. This begins with use of streamlined vocabulary, which is what I have been suggesting all along. 

But the real issue is our attitude regarding the police. There seem to be two schools of thought even among anti-Zionists. Some believe that the police are not to be trusted at all. Others believe that our propaganda should target the police to get them on our side.

I personally do not have much hope that the police will start arresting Zionist war criminals any time soon. Having said that, I think the best approach to this issue is to look at what our propaganda enemies are doing. We know for a fact that racist/Islamophobic groups ARE aiming their propaganda at the police (not to mention that many police departments receive their actual training from the IDF). This means that we HAVE TO do the same, not to get the police on our side, but just with the hope of keeping them neutral! Spreading information to the police does not imply trusting them to sort everything out. We are not at that stage yet. Our immediate aim is simply to prevent chaos. This is especially important in countries where civilians are not armed.

I personally have communicated with only one police officer, who was completely pro-Israel, pro-Jewish, implicitly racist and just plain unreceptive to anything I had to say. Hope you guys have better luck.

“To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord.” – Protocols of Zion

OK, let’s clear this up, hopefully for the last time. I actually wrote about the issue fairly recently:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/drawing-the-lines-of-opposition/

but let this post be the definitive one.

1) “Zionist” is not a code-word for “Jew”. Anyone who has been around this site knows that we do not shy away from saying “Jew” when appropriate. But just because we use “Jew” in our discussion doesn’t mean “Zionist” is obsolete. When we say “Jew”, we mean Jew. When we say “Zionist”, we mean Zionist.

2) There is no such thing as an ‘anti-Zionist Jew’, because Zionism is a fundamental consequence of Jewish identity, therefore to claim opposition to Zionism while retaining Jewish identity is hypocrisy. (A person of Jewish ancestry who is on our side should declare apostasy from Judaism and voluntarily not reproduce.) (“The good Jew does not exist, for one such as that would cease to be a Jew.” – John Alan Martinson Jr.)

3) There are, however, non-Jewish Zionists. Therefore, the word “Zionist” does not exclude any Jews, but includes their non-Jewish helpers, commonly referred to as Shabbos Goys.

4) Zionism refers not only to events after the founding of the Zionist Movement in 1897 by Theodor Herzl (Jew). The term “Zion” appears in the Tanakh, therefore Zionism has actually existed for as long as the idea of Zion – a ‘promised land’ from which Jews will subjugate all other peoples – has existed and motivated Jewish behaviour. (“Then the moon shall be confounded, and the sun ashamed, when the Lord of hosts shall reign in mount Zion.” – Tanakh (Some believe the moon refers to Islam and the sun to National Socialism.))

Zion is not to be understood as a “Jewish homeland”, but as a strategic headquarters for the international Jewish diaspora.

“When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish state in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign state, this cannot be controlled by other states. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a school for the training of other swindlers.” – Adolf Hitler

Now really pay attention:

5) “Zionism” ultimately refers to the broad plan outlined in the Protocols of Zion and its possible unfoldings in reality, which is what anti-Zionists are specifically dedicated to countering. However, there are many people aware of Jewish machination who yet believe that Jews have an agenda other than Zionism. In particular, Gentiles (depending on their ethnicity) believe that the agenda is “black genocide” or “white genocide” or similar paranoid drivel in which Jews have forged a mysterious alliance with all other groups against their own. These people may be anti-Jewish, but they are not anti-Zionists. In fact they are Zionist useful idiots, because Zionism is precisely about fooling non-Jews into fighting each other by whatever means possible.

Jews know that they cannot stop more and more people from seeing their bad behaviour. Their last line of propaganda defense is to mislead us into seeing the WRONG AGENDA behind their bad behaviour. This is why they themselves promote Jew-blaming racist groups: the ones who, if we mistake them for our allies just on account of their anti-Jewish (but not anti-Zionist) rhetoric, would lead us all into the abyss.

So here is how it is: we use “Jew” to rally agreement on who the enemy is; we use “Zionist” to rally agreement on what the enemy is trying to do to us. Allies can only be found based on agreement on BOTH these points.

And finally we use “Aryan” to rally agreement on what we stand for: Unity Through Nobility.

“That is the mightiest thing which our Movement must create: for these widespread, seeking and straying masses a new Faith which will not fail them in this hour of confusion, to which they can pledge themselves, on which they can build so that they may at least find once again a place which may bring calm to their hearts.” – Adolf Hitler

Regarding the condition of Israel and Jewish power in America, I see a need to distinguish between positivity and optimism. Yes, we must be positive, in that we must believe that we can make a difference through activism to win the argument over our enemies. This is not the same, however, as the kind of optimism that leads people to believe that we can just sit back and wait for the victory to show up by itself.

Elysium wrote:

anti-Zionists should cease grouping Obama in Israel’s camp, and instead urge that he and America cease supporting Israel.

My reading of this suggestion is quite different to OC’s. I agree that, for propaganda purposes, it might be a good idea to demand that Obama cease supporting Israel. I disagree with internally holding any expectation that Obama – who is nothing more than a Shabbos Goy for Rahm Emanuel (Jew) - would actually pay attention to such demands. Rather, the only purpose of such demands would merely be to make the continuing American support of Israel a more polarizing issue than Obama’s domestic policies. Obama is already unpopular; our aim should be to make him unpopular for the right reasons. The most we can hope for is an anti-Israel version of the Tea Party Movement being formed. This would then be a realistic population pool for promotion to full anti-Zionism, from which in turn people like John Alan Martinson and Adam Austin might finally get the required numbers and funding for their revolutionary militia.

And while the economic collapse is indeed an opportunity for the emergence of new government, let us be realistic: the Gentiles are currently ahead of us in the ideological queue. We have to overtake them first to have a chance. I absolutely believe this can be done with enough effort, because in the final analysis our ideology is far superior to any of theirs, but I do not assume the Gentiles are going to give up of their own accord. And I guarantee that Jews, if forced to choose between supporting Gentiles or supporting us, will support Gentiles. Remember: this is a three-way conflict, and should always be described as such.

I do anticipate dramatic and even apparently miraculous events in the next few years. We should at least consider the possibility that these could be engineered events designed to put us off-guard, for Jews would surely rather give us an illusory victory than wait for us to achieve genuine victory. My warning is this: if it looks too good to be true, it probably is. (Have we not been warned that the Antichrist/Dajjal will perform miracles to gain followers, and make people believe that he is their saviour?)

The future is not set. We must believe we can win. We must not assume we cannot lose.

The full documentary ‘Who Brought the Slaves to America’ is now available here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/refresh963

I missed it when it was first released (though I knew about the content), and having just watched it, I highly recommend everyone to spread it to as many people as possible. The opening and closing statements are particularly important, so I have posted the relevant parts here directly:

Unity Through Nobility.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100625/ap_on_re_eu/eu_netherlands_decoy_jews#mwpphu-container

This will not end well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUJhHL0dK7E

Also, please add the Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna) to your list of enemy groups if you have not already done so. Look up the brothers Kent and Ted Ekeroth (Jews) and their propaganda. How many more examples do we need before people get it?

Ted Ekeroth (right)

The Nine Gentiles

Working on the main site. Please be patient, and in the meantime continue your own activism.