Backlash Herders

This page lists prominent Jewish (including crypto-Jewish) propagandists responsible for promoting attitudes such as Islamophobia, racism (implicit or explicit) towards so-called “Third World” ethnicities, and an overarching admiration of and desire to preserve Western civilization. The main purpose of this list is to highlight that such attitudes, which were virtually absent as recently as the 1990s, but which have become increasingly popular since 9/11, were initially promoted disproportionately by Jews until they gained enough momentum to continue growing by themselves. As such, it is clear to us that the rise of such attitudes as a pre-scripted right-wing backlash to the 1960s-1990s counterculture is part of the Zionist agenda, and hence must be rejected by all serious anti-Zionists.

Names are arranged in alphabetical order. Feel free to suggest other Jews/crypto-Jews whom you think should be included. This page is constantly under construction.

Gadi Adelman (Jew)

Andrew Anglin (Jew)

Gilad Atzmon (Jew)

Andrew (“weev”) Auernheimer (Jew)

Lawrence Auster (Jew)

Bruce Bawer (Jew)

Peter Beinart (Jew)

Borislav Bereza (Jew)

Judith Bergman (Jew)

Christopher Jon Bjerknes (Jew)

Andrew Bostom (Jew)

Andrew Breitbart (Jew)

Henryk Broder (Jew)

Frank Collins (Jew)

Michael Coren (Jew)

Richard Dawkins (Jew)

Matt Drudge (Jew)

Paul Eisen (Jew)

Kent Ekeroth (Jew)

Ted Ekeroth (Jew)

Marcus Epstein (Jew)

Avigdor Eskin (Jew)

Abraham Foxman (Jew)

Jayda Fransen (Jew)

Daniel Friberg (Jew)

Frank Gaffney (Jew)

Pamela Geller (Jew)

David Gelernter (Jew)

Paul Gottfried (Jew)

Daniel Greenfield (Jew)

Sam Harris (Jew)

Michael Hart (Jew)

Lars Hedegaard (Jew)

Peter Hitchens (Jew)

Carl Horowitz (Jew)

David Horowitz (Jew)

Raphael Israeli (Jew)

Peder “Fjordman” Jensen (Jew)

Nathanael Kapner (Jew)

Joe Kaufman (Jew)

Mordechai Kedar (Jew)

Imre Kertesz (Jew)

Ben Klassen (Jew)

Ray Kurzweil (Jew)

Walter Laqueur (Jew)

Ezra Levant (Jew)

Michael Levin (Jew)

Bernard Lewis (Jew)

Avi Lipkin (Jew)

David Littman (Jew)

Laura Loomer (Jew)

Bill Maher (Jew)

Henry Makow (Jew)

Marion Maréchal-Le Pen (Jew)

Ilana Mercer (Jew)

Stephen Miller (Jew)

Stefan Molyneux (Jew)

Steven Mosher (Jew)

Fiamma Nirenstein (Jew)

Mike “Enoch” Peinovich (Jew)

Melanie Phillips (Jew)

Daniel Pipes (Jew)

Joel Pollack (Jew)

Dennis Prager (Jew)

Vladimir Putin (Jew)

Nina Rosenwald (Jew)

Howard Rotberg (Jew)

Byron Roth (Jew)

Edwin Rubenstein (Jew)

Mike Savage (Jew)

Mayer Schiller (Jew)

Debbie Schlussel (Jew)

Ben Shapiro (Jew)

Nachum Shifren (Jew)

Christina Hoff Sommers (Jew)

Lauren Southern (Jew)

Richard Spencer (Jew)

Robert Spencer (Jew)

Mark Steyn (Jew)

Shmuel Trigano (Jew)

Robert Weissberg (Jew)

Diana West (Jew)

Paul Weston (Jew)

Geert Wilders (Jew)

Curtis Yarvin (“Mencius Moldbug”) (Jew)

Zvi Yehezkeli (Jew)

Bat Ye’or (Jew)

David Yerushalmi (Jew)

Milo Yiannopoulous (Jew)

Milos Zeman (Jew)

Eric Zemmour (Jew)

Vladimir Zhirinovsky (Jew)

176 Responses to Backlash Herders

  1. Gallery Guy says:

    @Pandorastop

    “National currencies should be ‘valued’ on labor itself, period.”

    Labor should definitely include necessary and proper assassinations.

  2. AS says:

    @FD

    If you want to target Duke, countering his ideas would be more effective than assassinating him. Whereas assassinating enemy strategists can be valuable, assassinating enemy propagandists only gives the impression that we are incapable of debunking their propaganda. One thing you could do is get hold of a copy of Duke’s “My Awakening”, start a new blog and debunk it chapter by chapter, paragraph by paragraph. This is, in fact, what we should be doing with EVERY far-right book.

    The most fitting way for Duke to die would be for the state to execute him for treason. America is defined by E Pluribus Unum. Therefore WN is treason. But only by winning the propaganda war will this be widely understood.

    @Gerulf

    “I definitely wasn’t aware that the anti-Zionism scene hadn’t always been dominated by racialists.”

    Racialists are simply people who believe that genetics matter to society. It is perfectly possible to believe that genetics matter to society while at the same time utterly despising any notion of “white” identity or interests. So it would not be a problem, indeed it would be preferable, for the anti-Zionism scene to be dominated by racialists, as racialism is correct. The problem is that the anti-SEMITISM scene today has become dominated not by anti-Zionists but by people who promote the exact equivalent of Zionism among “whites” (what we call Boromir Syndrome).

    http://aryanism.net/politics/uniting-anti-zionists/

  3. John Johnson says:

    @AS
    “Racialists are simply people who believe that genetics matter to society.”

    Although that is the meaning the word ought to have, it was frequently used (and apparently coined) by racists before the word ‘racism’ came into vogue:

    racialism (n.)
    1882, “tribalism;” 1890, “political system advocating superiority and exclusive rights based on race,”

    http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=racialism

    (I’ve also found dozens of older websites saying “racialism” and “racialist” were commonly used with the same definition as racism/racist c. 1907-1917, citing an earlier version of the EtymologyOnline page (but also with no sources of the exact context/document/person where it was coined of course)).

    Although it seems non-racists have a competing claim:

    “In 1903, W. E. B. Du Bois said that racialism is the philosophical position that races existed, and that collective differences existed among such categories, the races.[citation needed] He further stated that racism required advancing the argument that one race is superior to other races of human beings. In In My Father’s House (1992), Kwame Anthony Appiah summarized Du Bois’s philosophical stance that racialism is value-neutral term and that racism is a value-charged term.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racialism

  4. RP says:

    Anglin is a Jew? Anyone got a source for that? Also to be added is Curtis Yarvin (Jew), the neo feudalist:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin#Personal_life

    “Yarvin’s father is Jewish.”

  5. AS says:

    @RP

    There are a number of YouTube videos on this topic:

    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=andrew+anglin+jew

    Thanks for pointing out Yarvin! Added.

  6. RP says:

    “I have also noticed that the lines between ZC and BS are becoming more blurred than they were a few years ago.”

    Gentiles aren’t even trying to hide it anymore:
    https:/twitter.com/NickJFuentes/status/948382791343005696

    Here we have Nick Fuentes (Gentile), 19 year old alt right commentator openly praising Israel and Jewish supremacy, and arguing how WNs merely seek to emulate it. With this we will see the destruction of the BS camp, as Gentiles will now focus on portraying Israel as a role model rather than bashing Jews.

    Gentiles will also begin to focus less on Hitler, as many have said it is not good for “optics”, with many even going so far as to (correctly) state that the Allied troops were themselves WNs, and therefore praising the Allied Troops for their heroism is good for their movement.

  7. RP says:

    Please add Laura Loomer (Jewess) who works for Rebel Media (owned by Jew Ezra Levant).
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Loomer

    Laura Loomer is a fanatic right wing Zionist who has received praise from the alt right for bashing leftists, and more recently for “exposing” the obvious fact that Jews control the media. Although many were initially skeptical of her extreme Zionism, their tune seems to have changed as she been warmly received as a “red pilled” Jew.
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=QkMyA4vZ-fY

    Here are some of the comments she has made about Palestinians:
    https://twitter.com/lauraloomer/status/885851912310063105?lang=en

    And here is her disgustingly hideous face:
    https://dstormer6em3i4km.onion.link/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Laura-Elizabeth-Loomer.jpg

  8. AS says:

    @RP

    “many even going so far as to (correctly) state that the Allied troops were themselves WNs”

    I recently came across a highly informative page:

    https://crimesofbritain.com/2016/09/13/the-trial-of-winston-churchill/

    Unfortunately it is False Left, hence its pro-democracy undertone, as well as the following misleading excerpt:

    Leo Amery who was the British Secretary of State in India said he “didn’t see much difference between his [Churchill] outlook and Hitler’s”.

    (Amery knew Churchill but did not know Hitler, and hence speaks of “Hitler’s outlook” entirely based on his own (inaccurate) presumption, something which this page fails to point out. In fact, Churchill’s outlook towards Indians was: “They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” whereas Hitler’s was: “I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant islanders [e.g. Churchill!].”)

    Nevertheless it is a concise reference for Churchill’s racism:

    Churchill found his love for war during the time he spent in Afghanistan. While there he said “all who resist will be killed without quarter” because the Pashtuns need “recognise the superiority of race”.

    Churchill being your archetypical British supremacist believed that Kenya’s fertile highlands should be only for white colonial settlers. He approved the forcible removal of the local population, which he termed “blackamoors”.

    In 2012 Churchill was honoured with a statue in Jerusalem for his assistance to Zionism. He regarded the Arab population Palestine to be a “lower manifestation”.

    Churchill wrote that his only “irritation” during the Boer war was “that Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men”.

    It was Churchill who planted the seed to strip voting rights from black people in South Africa. In June 1906, Churchill argued that Afrikaners should be allowed a self-rule which would mean black people would be excluded from voting.

    He went on to state to Parliament that “we must be bound by the interpretation which the other party places on it and it is undoubted that the Boers would regard it as a breach of that treaty if the franchise were in the first instance extended to any persons who are not white”.

    Churchill suggested the motto “Keep England White” when debating the adoption of new laws limiting immigration from the Caribbean.

    The above page is best studied in conjunction with rightists’ own flaunting of Churchill’s racism as part of their attempt to make racism fashionable again, an example of which is provided on the main site:

    http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/churchill.jpg

  9. Max says:

    While you’re on the right track about Zionist funding and a lot of what you say is true, there’s a few issues that make me very suspicious about you.

    First of all, the title, “Herders of backlash”. Zionist funding of the far right and the Islamophobia industry is something I’m doing a lot of reading about and the only place I’ve ever seen the word “Backlash” used is in the 2015 IJAN report (International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network) report. Backlash against what? Zionist pro-Israel backlash gainst the BDS movement and all pro-Palestinian organisations. This is the whole purpose of the Islamophobia industry, to demonise all Muslims so the Palestinian resistance can be discredited as Islamic extremism and terrorism. Demonising all Muslims is also about the pro-Israel’s lobby’s fear of educated and integrated Muslims in America and Europe getting into positions of power. which will mean pro-Israel lobbies losing control of our governments.

    http://www.ijan.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/IJAN-Business-of-Backlash-full-report-web.pdf

    Secondly, there’s your picture using a swastika and the “refugees welcome” logo, used by the left. The left are also a target of these Zionist cranks because of their pro-Palestinian stance and support for innocent Muslims being demonised by the Islamophobia industry. Wouldn’t an influx of refugees go against the belief of a genetically pure race and nationalism?

    Thirdly, your constant use of the word “Jew”, which is anti-semitism and not the Zionist version of anti-semitism used to silence criticism of Israel. There are millions of anti-Zionist Jews, who are against the political movement of Zionism and there are millions of Zionist Christians, atheists & even Zionists.

    These points make me wonder if this blog has been written by a Zionist in the employ of one of the people mentioned above to deliberately smear the left as Nazis & smear anti-Zionists as anti-Semites. This is the kind of stunt someone like David Horowitz would pull, so your contradictions and the benefit this blog has for Zionists really makes me wonder who you really are.

  10. Max says:

    End of 4th paragraph, I meant to say “Even Zionist Muslims.” Can’t seem to be able to edit.

  11. Fatih Dion says:

    @Max

    “Wouldn’t an influx of refugees go against the belief of a genetically pure race and nationalism?”

    Have you read our website content? I’m very aware of you that you are internet troll

    “Thirdly, your constant use of the word “Jew”, which is anti-semitism and not the Zionist version of anti-semitism used to silence criticism of Israel. There are millions of anti-Zionist Jews, who are against the political movement of Zionism and there are millions of Zionist Christians, atheists & even Zionists.”

    We do not trust EVERY. SINGLE. JEW.

    http://aryanism.net/politics/anti-zionism-basics/the-jewish-lie/

    Please read all of our content before comment, bro

  12. AS says:

    @Max

    “Backlash against what?”

    Backlash against Muslims, “Third World”-origin people:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-attacks-protections-for-immigrants-from-shithole-countries-in-oval-office-meeting/2018/01/11/bfc0725c-f711-11e7-91af-31ac729add94_story.html

    the idea of cosmopolitanism, the common understanding that racism is unethical, and so on. Basically backlash against the ground gained by leftism over the past decades.

    “This is the whole purpose of the Islamophobia industry, to demonise all Muslims so the Palestinian resistance can be discredited as Islamic extremism and terrorism. Demonising all Muslims is also about the pro-Israel’s lobby’s fear of educated and integrated Muslims in America and Europe getting into positions of power. which will mean pro-Israel lobbies losing control of our governments.”

    This is certainly true, but it goes deeper. Israel does not want to remain in the extremely dangerous position of being the only ethnostate in the world. The more ethnostates there are in the world, the harder it becomes to single out Israel for condemnation, and thus the safer Israel becomes. The backlash is designed to produce the desire for Gentile ethnostates, which will eventually lead to their creation unless those who desire them are eliminated first.

    “there’s your picture using a swastika and the “refugees welcome” logo, used by the left. The left are also a target of these Zionist cranks because of their pro-Palestinian stance and support for innocent Muslims being demonised by the Islamophobia industry.”

    You are correct. We are leftists and we are targeted by Zionists all the time for our pro-Palestinian stance and support for innocent Muslims.

    “Wouldn’t an influx of refugees go against the belief of a genetically pure race and nationalism?”

    No. Race means quality, not ethnicity. Nationalism is not the same thing as nativism (which is fundamentally unfair because no one chooses where they are born) but about autarky, labour-backed currency and other elements in which refugees can participate just as well as anyone else from the moment they arrive. Please read the main site.

    “Thirdly, your constant use of the word “Jew”, which is anti-semitism”

    No, it is not. We have nothing against speakers of Semitic languages, which is what “anti-Semitism” actually means. “Anti-Semitism” is deliberately
    . misused to mean “anti-Jewish” by Jews to divert attention from the fact that we are opposed to their Jewishness (which could easily lead people to suspect that Jews might be the ones in the wrong), by making it seem like we are opposed to all people of Semitic background (which makes it appear that we are in the wrong).

    “There are millions of anti-Zionist Jews, who are against the political movement of Zionism”

    There is no such thing as an “anti-Zionist Jew”, since Zionism is an idea from Judaism, consequent to Jewish identity. Any sincere anti-Zionist who has Jewish parents would voluntarily renounce Judaism and Jewishness, and would voluntarily refrain from reproducing so as to terminate the Jewish bloodline that they themselves never chose to be born into. So long as Judaism and Jewish identity exists, the latent danger of Zionism will remain even if Israel were temporarily destroyed. The world can only be reasonably considered safe from Zionism when Judaism is a dead religion and all identifiable Jewish bloodlines have been discontinued. Even then there will remain a danger of other bloodlines with tribalist tendencies adopting Judaism and hence Zionism:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Israelism

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Israelism

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hebrew_Israelites

    etc.

    so those bloodlines must also be terminated as part of anti-Zionism.

    “and there are millions of Zionist Christians, atheists & even Zionists.”

    You are correct. We oppose them also. Again, please read the main site.

  13. RP says:

    @AS
    “the idea of cosmopolitanism”

    Alt rightists say cosmopolitanism was invented by Jews, but the irony is that the term “rootless cosmopolitan” originated in the USSR!

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootless_cosmopolitan

    No wonder some Nazbol types are Stalinists!

  14. AS says:

    @RP

    “Alt rightists say cosmopolitanism was invented by Jews”

    This alone illustrates how clueless the Alt-Right is about the Jewish character. See my comment (and the important Hitler quote) back here:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/heather-heyer-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-175815

  15. Sam Sanders says:

    Jordan Peterson, wife is jew.

    There is a video of him where he completely refuses to answer about jews-killings.

    He is selling individualism-capitalism with a hint of islamophobia, and extra distraction.

  16. Sam Sanders says:

    What do you think of Sam Gerrans, he looks highly suspicious to me:

    Bio from him – Sam Gerrans is an English writer and speaker with professional backgrounds in media, strategic communications, and technologies.
    He is driven by commitment to ?ultimate? meaning, and focused on authentic approaches to revelation and Realpolitik.
    He is founder of Quranite.com and author of The Qur’an: A Complete Revelation where his consistent, Qur’an-centric hermeneutical methodology is applied to the text of the Qur’an in its entirety.

    However, he blames Islam corruption squarely on the Persians, even gives the persians top jewish characteristics. He also talks about NWO in that completely non jew way. He asks for sheckles on his website, is selling a book with an agenda (about a religious philosophy that is borne from desire to remove agenda) just like the jewish corruptors before him. He even adds his own whatever bullshit says he found the God protocol. Which looking at it seems like he might be trying to carve out an evangelical type crypto-jew thing out of Islam.

    He seems like he just popped into the scene from who knows where, but he has a background in media. And he has a shill army defending him.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Sam-GERRANS-Quranite-translation-of-Quranic-verse-7-33-“baghy”-?????-as-“zealotry”-defendable

    I realize he is not well known, but he does seem to be laid out and ready to be picked up into the discourse or maybe just a distraction.

  17. Stanley Queen says:

    Shouldn’t Nikolas Cruz go on this list?

  18. John Johnson says:

    Cruz is an example of someone who has been herded, rather than an influential herder/propagandist himself.

  19. Stanley Queen says:

    @JJ

    Good point. I did see some people on social try to defend what Cruz did in Florida, but, looking at their defenses again, it’s mostly because they needlessly feel ‘sorry’ for him.

  20. RP says:

    @JJ
    “Cruz is an example of someone who has been herded, rather than an influential herder/propagandist himself.”

    Sheriff Steve Israel (Jew) who failed to stop Cruz and is now calling for gun control legislation, would belong on this list, but he is most likely a False Left agent (like Soros) put in place to agitate right wingers, and get them to buy more firearms.

  21. AS says:

    One thing we can certainly say about Cruz is that he is virtually a cookie-cutter mass-production item of the Alt-Right:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoneman_Douglas_High_School_shooting#Nikolas_Cruz

    social media accounts believed to be linked to him contain anti-black and anti-Muslim slurs.[43]

    Cruz advocated for the killing of Mexicans, blacks, and gay people in a private Instagram group chat. He said his hate for black people was “simply because they were black”, referred to white women in interracial relationships as traitors, and expressed anti-immigrant and antisemitic views.[51]

    He enjoyed hunting.”[43] He also bragged about killing animals.

    @JJ

    “Cruz is an example of someone who has been herded”

    And for each one like Cruz, there are millions more who hold similar beliefs and who intend to march through the institutions to take them over from within, until one day people from the groups that Cruz dislikes will cease to be protected by law enforcement. That is the bigger danger.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/florida-public-school-teacher-white-nationalist-podcast_us_5a99ae32e4b089ec353a1fba

  22. RP says:

    @AS
    Cruz is a Jew:
    https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/16/us/exclusive-school-shooter-instagram-group/index.html

    “During one of the anti-Semitic rants in the chat, Cruz spoke of his birth mother, saying, “My real mom was a Jew. I am glad I never met her.””

    While the media downplays his Jewish identity, far rightists are now using this opportunity to deflect any criticisms of themselves.

  23. AS says:

    @RP

    I was aware of this. It makes Cruz a child of one Jewish parent, but his words suggest he does not himself identify as Jewish, and I am willing to believe he is sincere. He probably believes the Alt-Right narrative about Jews, and hence dislikes Jews for all the wrong reasons. There is no way the Alt-Right can convincingly distance themselves from him, since they are whom he listens to.

  24. RP says:

    @AS
    “Of course these two effects combined play right into the Zionist agenda, as it basically produces a worldview in which Jew-awareness exists but merely as a sundry fact of life!”

    Milo Yiannoppolous (Jew):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN9N3v9UsXE
    “It’s not anti semitic to point out statistics”

  25. Lucius Rhine says:

    This fact of this is frightening, but very real. I currently have a Jew present in the measly Green Party chapter I have started here. I am trying to figure out how to oust her, because she is clearly and openly “Jew aware.” However she is an open anarchist and dissents against me whenever I make any Statist assertions. She has a Ph.D which makes her more credible to the other non-Jews present.

  26. Lucius Rhine says:

    Some potential allies at this link?

    http://www.holocausts.org/

    Don’t be put off by the name.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>