Earth’s Form Reconsidered, the Mother of All Truths

 

The first thing people tend to ask who haven’t considered the earth to be anything but what we’ve been told, is what does it matter? I want to state that before all such questions my primary concern always, before all else, is truth. So how can we know something is absolutely true? As subjective beings, I don’t think we really can; rather we can postulate what is most likely to be true by eliminating all that’s impossible.

Koreshans around their geodetic device

About two and a half years ago I stumbled upon scientific sources while web surfing that TV and school never broached. A man named Cyrus Teed in the late 1800s had an epiphany that we lived inside earth. He claimed earth is an enclosed, concave terrafirma that houses the universe, sun, moon, stars, planets, etc – inside of it. (Admittedly at first this came across as crazy to me). He called it the cellular cosmogony – the title of the book he and his friend Ulysses Grant Morrow wrote. (http://wildheretic.com/cellular%20cosmogony.pdf)

Ulysses Morrow was a geodesist (earth surveyor), and he invented the device in the photo above to verify their claims. (http://www.wildheretic.com/concave-earth-theory/6/)

This was basically a 4 mile long level, along the Bay of Naples, Florida, whose results indeed verified their claims that the earth’s surface curves upward, not downward; that earth is of a cellular design. The findings showed earth to curve upward at same rate as it’s believed to curve downward; the math showing earth to be 25,000 mi in circumference – the same size as commonly believed.

But it wasn’t just one experiment that indicated the cellular cosmogony to be true. In 1901 J.B. Watson, the chief engineer at the Tamarack copper mine in Michigan suspended 4250 ft long plumb lines down mine shafts. The measurements showed the lines were farther apart from each other at the bottom than the top.

The balls were expected to move closer together towards the center of the Earth where the center of gravity should reside if it were a pull dependent on mass as Newton said it was

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The rectilineator disproved earth’s convexity, and the Tamarack mine shaft experiment disproved Newton’s concept of gravity being a downward pull toward earth’s supposed center. Another experiment called Airy’s Failure was another simple test in attempt to prove the rotation of the earth, and failed. This was done with a telescope and water. Since light moves slower through water, G.B. Airy was able to observe the aberration of the stars through a telescope filled with water at a greater angle than filled with air. The findings were contrary to the Copernican theory of a revolving earth, showing the stars to be moving, not earth! (http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no066/vdkamp.html)

 

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” – Nikola Tesla

The electric universe theory has come a way since Tesla, and what do you know, plasma physics and electromagnetism correlate with cellular cosmogony: Concave Earth Scientific Evidences

Here is visual proof of earth’s concavity, made possible via recent advanced zoom technology on cameras: Objects shown inclined in the distance

So what does this all mean? What about all the flat earth buzz? I’ve been following that noise too, and speculated the same thing that’s highlighted in the following post from Reddit – that flat earth theory is meant to misinform and distract from the truth. (https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4q3rfu/flat_earth_is_a_zionist_psyop_to_discredit_the/)

Is the flat earth craze a psyop? Possibly. All I know is the leader of the flat earth community, vegan self defense and yoga practitioner Eric Dubay, is almost an antithetic personality in contrast to the unofficial spokesperson for concave earth theory today – Steven Christopher, who actually calls himself the messiah “Steven Christ”. He’s literally the last guy you’d want representing a truth of this magnitude. One of several saving graces for cellular cosmogony is the network previously cited, the Wild Heretic: http://www.wildheretic.com/

Here you will find most your questions answered. The people who run this network write in a similar style as members of this network, just more science oriented. I would guess that many of you will enjoy what they have to say.

The following are illustrations of what I can confidently say is the factual model of earth and the universe.

Light Bends

We are an Emanation of Life from a Central Source

Here’s a good visual of light bending…

I’m only now positing this discovery that just in the last year or so has spread among a growing minority of people (unfortunately hardly noticed since flat-earth has been blown up into the foreground) because I feel the time is right. Most take one look at “concave earth” and turn away once they find the Zionist shill occupying its cyberspace. Conversely, they take a few looks into mainstream mentioned flat-earth, and the likable Dubay is just too shrewd and correct on many things to consider the former. There are several damning fallacies with the flat earth model popular “scientists” like Freemason metaphysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson fail to even bring up when they’re “debunking” it. It’s almost like they want us to believe it’s flat!

This is the mother of all truths. I’d guess that at some level of the Zionist hierarchy it’s common knowledge. It’s basically the equivalent of hiding god. How this knowledge would change the collective consciousness of humanity may not be fathomable.

Since the Copernican era science has advanced considerably. We found that sound creates light! People began making assumptions based on a false assumption, like for example that the stars were “distant suns”. Scientific advancement, thanks much to Tesla’s work, has shown us more likely scenarios, based on actual experimentation, not mere theory. Sound creating light is called ‘sonoluminesence’ – a word internet spellcheck doesn’t recognize.

Stars are Bubbles of Light Created by Sound Frequency, Not Distant Suns

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They also didn’t have hot air or weather balloons, or cameras then. The common fisheye lens today however distorts footage and photos, conveniently making earth’s horizon appear warped one way or the other. On the Red Bull Stratos jump, the one normal camera inside the pod shows a horizon slightly above the center of the large window from which Felix jumped. On a ball, the horizon would be several inches below the center of window. (https://youtu.be/Dt0QuBsGU20)

Despite advances in science, the assumption earth is one of the planets circling a large central sun, sustained. There are obvious discrepancies with the heliocentric model, like the fact we do not see a new sky of stars every six months when we’re supposedly on the other side of a central sun, in which case new stars should be seen at night the whole world-over. This of course doesn’t happen, because it’s the same star-map inside a central, revolving celestial sphere. Kind of like a big disco ball. The stars are bubbles of light in water, produced by the sound frequency of the heavens.

The sun itself is known in many scientific circles as electric, not a ‘nuclear furnace’, yet the dated theory is still taught in the mainstream media and school. The Thunderbolts Project team, while presumably not aware of earth’s concavity, have made advances in proving the electric nature the universe and sun through experiments and critical observations. Eric Dullard, a scientist who specializes in electricity and sound frequency, declares the sun to be electric: The Sun isn\’t What We\’ve Been Told

As Aryanists I feel there is a duty to truth, and I would not be posting this now if I wasn’t thoroughly convinced it is more than likely true. Please research for yourselves, do not fear telling others. Truth has nothing to fear from alternative views. I feel we are here to enlighten, to love, and to help guide others to the light out of this cell. Deep down, it is as everybody knows – “the world we live in”, not “the world we live on”. Godspeed Aryans.

Posted in AryanAim | 4 Comments

Heather Heyer RIP

Rachel Corrie, run over by an IDF bulldozer in 2003, has had streets named after her in Palestine and Iran. Will Heather Heyer, run over by a Trump train (technically a private car) in 2017, have streets named after her in the US (or perhaps, aptly, a statue of her to replace the Robert E. Lee statue that is meant to be taken down)? If the Alt-Right wins, she will surely not.

And the problem is that Heyer, and too many like her who are on our side, are not even close to ready to fight the Alt-Right. If Heyer had been ready, she would have brought a firearm to the Charlottesville rally, and it could have been vehicular identitarian James Fields who would be dead by now from her gunfire. Heyer’s choice of Facebook quote indicates moral but not necessarily strategic awareness. A better quote might be: “If you’re not trained and equipped to personally kill Alt-Right terrorists, you’re not paying attention.” Outrage as a reaction to injustice is of course better than no feeling, but outrage alone does not achieve anything (except prompt the Alt-Right to make snowflake jokes about us). Only outrage distilled into paramilitary discipline and readiness to use deadly Ahimsa achieves results in practice.

The Alt-Right themselves give away their own greatest fear in their main rally slogan: “You will not replace us.” What they fear is being replaced. Our slogan must not be that of the spineless Terry McAuliffe: “Go home … You are not wanted in this great commonwealth.” Why would McAuliffe expect the Alt-Right to obey(!!!) him? Any slogan phrased in the form of a demand to the enemy is structurally absurd, as the enemy by definition consists of those who do not care about our demands. No, our slogan must be phrased exactly as their slogan is phrased – as a statement of our own plan of action. Our slogan must confirm their fear. Our slogan should simply be: WE WILL REPLACE YOU.

An America with one fewer James Fields and one more Heather Heyer is self-evidently an incrementally better America. An America with a hundred million fewer racists (including all Jews) and a hundred million more anti-racists is self-evidently a phenomenally better America. This is replacement. Why are so many leftists still afraid to openly admit that we would like – very much indeed – to replace genetically inferior people with genetically superior people? The exercise of politics is the exercise of replacement! Is it not our wish to replace Donald Trump, Stephen Miller (Jew), Steve Bannon, etc. with politicians that we prefer? So how much sense does it make to aim for the replacement of the politicians but not of their support bases?

If you support Western civilization, WE WILL REPLACE YOU. It is our duty to do so.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 55 Comments

The birth of Turandom

I told you this would happen.

Get the full story from our enemy blog (please read the entire article and also the comments):

http://gatesofvienna.net/2017/07/todays-historic-moment-in-budapest/

This summit represents a sea change in relations between Israel and the European Union. … The V4 and Israel have interests in common.

“The Hungarian point of view in this matter was: The European Union should value those efforts that the State of Israel makes for the stability of the region, which is not only in Israel’s interests but in Europe’s, too, because it protects us from newer and newer waves of migrant invasion.”

“Hungary was the, in many ways, the birth of modern Zionism, the movement that led to the establishment of the modern Jewish state because in Hungary was born our modern Moses, Theodore Herzl.”

Dismiss the danger of Turanian blood memory at the peril of everything we value. Turandom also exists in diaspora form:

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-40509632

The anti-immigration party trying to recruit immigrants

Although their manifesto calls for a near-total halt to immigration, the far-right political party Britain First is now actively trying to appeal to Polish immigrants.

Indeed it gathers explicitly by Turanian metabolism:

https://mic.com/articles/168188/milk-nazis-white-supremacists-creamy-pseudo-science-trump-shia-labeouf#.odYG4rsuR

Some white supremacists think white ethnic identity has a geographic, historical correlation with the body’s tolerance for milk — specifically, the production of the lactase enzyme that allows humans to break down lactose.

For that matter, I also do not believe it to be mere coincidence that two out of three of Trump’s wives have heavy Turanian blood, and that his children then went on the marry Jews.

The best countermeasure to Turandom is Aryandom. Again I will let our enemy blog do the reporting for us:

http://gatesofvienna.net/2017/07/growing-anti-semitism-in-culturally-enriched-berlin-schools/

On some schoolyards, it were normal to insult each other as “You Jew!”

He remembers statements by teachers after the attack on the Christmas Market in Berlin. Conspiracy theories immediately circulated among some pupils, according to which the attack was staged by the Jews and the USA, and the attacker Amri was a CIA agent who wanted to incite hatred towards Muslims.

Teachers lament that some pupils with an Arab background blacken out the state Israel in the atlas, and react extremely emotionally to the topic of Israel. Teachers reported to us that hatred for Israel is pretty strong with some pupils. Slogans such as: “Jews are murderers”, “they kill our children”, “they steal our land”.

Demography is destiny. These schoolchildren are the demographic that must grow throughout the EU to bring a better future for the whole world. They are the demographic that Turandom wants to eradicate. Are we ready to protect them?

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 4 Comments

VK Clark on ‘Table Talk’ fraudulence

[Admin disclaimer: The following article represents the views of Clark only. Our movement does not necessarily endorse these views.]

Genoud, Heim & Picker’s “Table Talk”: A Study in Academic Fraud & Scandal

By Weronika Kuzniar

 

 

Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT). Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier, we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appearance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless. In this article, I will establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both Revisionist and Mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.

Whose “table talks”?

Before we commence, a brief word about the texts in question is necessary. The so-called “table talks” were written down by Martin Bormann’s aides, Heinrich Heim and Henry Picker, from 1941 to 1944. Aside from Heim and Picker, there are two more “table talk” authors, Bormann himself, “who contributed at least four entries, and a man known only as Müller.”

Mr. Picker was the first to publish his “table talks,” and he did so in German only. They were published as Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1942, in 1951 and 1963, respectively. His book included some of Heim’s notes that he happened to come across, and which he then altered for his book.

According to Nilsson, François Genoud, who we will discuss later, published the first volume of a French version of the “table talks” a year later, following that up with a second volume in 1954. This French version (henceforth LP) “was not based on the same German original as Picker’s… but on a second manuscript that had purportedly been acquired by Genoud, the so-called Bormann-Vermerke” (henceforth B-V5). And even though the “form, content and provenance of the [B-V] remain obscure,” historian David Irving attested to this manuscript’s authenticity nonetheless. Adds Nilsson, LP eventually contained both Heim’s and Picker’s notes in subsequent volumes and editions. Genoud then had LP translated into English, by which time it had been “expanded to cover the whole period from 1941 to the end of 1944, and to include all of Heim’s and Picker’s notes said to have been in Genoud’s possession.”

Writes Nilsson in this regard: The German text, which the French and English editions are said to be based upon, was, for reasons that are unclear, not published until 1980. It was given the title Monologe im Führerhauptquartier… This edition does not contain Picker’s notes either due to a struggle over intellectual property rights. It does not help that both Heim’s and Picker’s original manuscripts seem to have been lost.

So far, Mr. Carrier is the only historian who has compared these various “table talks” in a systematic way. His conclusions have exposed the English and French “table talks” as “highly questionable,” particularly if they are based on the same manuscript used for Genoud’s Monologe. The English “table talks,” Carrier reveals, are based in whole or part on Genoud’s LP, “and… both the English and French editions contain additions to, and mistranslations of, the German texts that they are supposedly based on.” Nilsson himself “address[es] certain questions related to the authenticity of the B-V, as well as the accuracy of the translations,”all of which is pertinent to most historians’ claim that Hitler is the author/originator of the “table talks.” As we will soon see, he was not.

Indeed, there is a whole lot of mystery and very little certainty surrounding “Hitler’s” supposed “table talks”.

Hugh Trevor-Roper’s failings

Let’s begin with Hugh Trevor-Roper. Contrary to his respectable and honest public image, Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in deception and fraud behind the scenes. The Hitler Diaries, proven to be a fraud, were not a unique fail for Trevor-Roper. In fact, as Swedish historian Mikael Nilsson has demonstrated, Trevor-Roper had a long trail of academic fails that he hid from the public eye.

His first fail is The Testament of Adolf Hitler, also known as Hitlers politisches Testament, first published in French in 1959, and in English in 1961. David Irving, and other historians such as Ian Kershaw, exposed this document, which was “acquired” and doctored by the notorious Nazi apologist and document peddler François Genoud, as a fraud. A fake.

Not surprisingly, I was attacked on Facebook for declaring that “Hitler’s Table Talk” is a “fraud,” which it is. The first attack reads: “Hitler’s table talk a fraud? based on what? what a BS. Have you ever red in in the original version? It is totally impossible to fake such prestigious thoughts that jump in all directions, but always in depth and related,,, you can not [sic] fake that, especially as their [sic] is no goal in faking it, they make hitler look better and there is not even a prooof [sic] of gas chambers or whatsoever in it. BASIC LOGIC APPLIED Bitte.” The second attack reads: “Did you read it? No you didn’t. Nor has [C] here. No single argument in the content that proves it is a fraud either just a statement. Not even a ball pen argument like Anne Franck hoaxers. The table talks are ingenious remarks from a well thought person on a host of topics impossible to fake. Are there transcrition [sic] error or some augmented passages, possibly. But even then, for what agenda. There is NONE.”

(*note: portions of original article skipped here viewable in the following link [along with it in its entirety] – Wilk Mocy Publishers)

…We still have neo-nazis touting the TT in its own dedicated podcast series, episodes 1 through 56. One neo-nazi writes on her website:

• How trustworthy is this text, since Martin Bormann assigned two of his aides to take the notes during meals, then turn them over to him for “checking” and safekeeping;

• Why it is valuable to study this book;

• Questions about the translation and translators – for example, did François Genoud tamper with the parts about Christianity;

• Of those offended by this book, Christians are #1 on the list, complaining that it does not agree with Hitler’s “public record” of positive remarks about Christianity in earlier years;

• David Irving and Albert Speer both confirmed that these recorded talks are authentically Hitler; Richard Carrier disagrees;

• Next week we’ll begin reading the text.

Indeed, the only aspect of TT with which most neo-nazis disagree is a few select entries about Christianity. Everything else is “legit” in their collective opinion. TT remains the most highly valued text next to Mein Kampf, also the result of extensive editing and external influence (such as that of Rudolf Hess and Max Amann), in the White Nationalist, Hitler worshiping community. We therefore owe it to these groups, and to the public at large, to tell them the truth about this text. It is not the words of Adolf Hitler.

(…continue article here: Wilk Mocy Publishers / Powerwolf Publications)

Posted in Other | 7 Comments

Summer cleaning

So, what I’ve done is merged the old ZC and BS Lists into a single Backlash Herders page, which now lists only Jews:

http://aryanism.net/blog/information/backlash-herders/

As previously discussed, the non-Jews have become far too numerous to keep up with. Which in itself is the clearest sign we have of how big the backlash has become. We need your help to stop it. If you want to help us, please send in a contact form:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

Because the Backlash Herders page was made by transplanting the BS Jews over into the old ZC List, this means that the comments section of the page is that of the old ZC List. However, I noted that there were some valuable discussions in the comments section of the old (now removed) BS List, so I have decided to repost select edited comment excerpts in this post. Hopefully newcomers and regulars alike can benefit from revisiting these old discussions and perhaps even further elaborating on the arguments involved; I have put in bold my personal favourite parts. Please also take this opportunity to discuss anti-backlash argumentation tactics in general. If you have encountered enemy arguments that you have trouble dealing with, please feel welcome to post them below in case someone else might be able to suggest good counterarguments to them.

AS vs “Red Pill” junkie:

“You claim that tribalism, which is natural, is exactly what the Jews want us to practice. Well, why do they preach communism across the globe?”

Because communism is the tribalism of proles. By the way, they have not preached communism for several decades. The more recent involvement of Jews is with far-right politics.

“Why do they condemn all forms of Tribalism other than their own?”

They do not. They promote it. One way by which they promote it is to make it non-PC, so that useful idiots like yourself then think you are rebelling when you are actually following the Zionist script.

But it is universalist ideologies which Jews have truly opposed throughout history, because only universalist ideologies expose the inferiority of Judaism (a tribalist religion) and hence of Jews themselves in comparison. Gentile tribalist ideologies, on the other hand, normalize Judaism and hence remove the motivation to destroy it.

“Whites pose the greatest threat to World Jewry.”

LOL! In an alternate world history where “whites” never existed, would Jews be more powerful or less powerful than they are today?

“It seems that YOU are helping the Zionist cause by preaching anti-tribalism”

Remember to tell that to Jesus also. Only universalists are able to despise tribalists with the intensity required to not rest until they have been wiped out. That is what we need to destroy Zionism, not more tribes in addition to Jews (which just spreads the disease)!

“The second I read that you are anti-tribalism (not allowing human beings to group naturally with others like them)”

I am currently grouping with people like myself (other universalists); the hint is in our motto: UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY. That is folkism, not tribalism. Do you see the difference? Two tribalists from different tribes may share a belief in tribalism, but this shared belief does not unite them, instead it sets them against each other. Two universalists, in contrast, are united by their shared belief in universalism.

“You say race doesn’t matter”

We say race matters. “Whiteness” is what doesn’t matter.

“and that as long as “Aryans” carry “the torch” it doesn’t matter what “team” they are from?”

And that is what we mean by race.

“Well then why do you exclude Jews?”

Because they are tribalists.

“Is it because of their racial makeup or soul?”

Both. Any group which lives among another larger group for multiple generations (as Jews have done for several thousand years) and still exists as a distinct identity has surely selected for genetic tendencies towards tribalism within its own members (since any non-tribalists among them would have integrated, so each new unintegrated generation will be more tribalistic than the generation before). Therefore even an individual Jew today who claims to be universalist should not be trusted, unless he voluntarily refuses to reproduce (as Jesus did).

“Then I could argue Blacks and other races who have lower IQs and more of a genetic propensity for violence etc., couldn’t be Aryans either.”

If “blacks” had a consistent historical record of refusing integration, then we would treat them no differently than Jews. (Indeed this is why National Socialism is hostile to Gypsies.) But that’s not the case for “blacks” at all. Wherever welcomed, “blacks” have always enthusiastically integrated. WNs implicitly admit this every time they complain about “black” men having sex with “white” women! (Portugal, for example, once had a “black” community which has since been fully absorbed into the population.) Wherever “blacks” remain unintegrated, it is invariably because others took measures to keep them segregated. In the US, for example, it was “white”, not “black”, Americans who passed Jim Crow laws. Indeed the very fact that “blackness” is defined as possessing any quantity of “black” ancestry shows clearly that the concept of “blackness” is fundamentally integrationist. The same cannot be said for “whiteness”, which is defined not by possession of “white” ancestry but by non-possession of “non-white” ancestry (a.k.a. the One Drop Rule).

If IQ were the qualification for being Aryan, Jews would be the most Aryan of all.

As for genetic propensity for violence, you have to be fucking kidding me. In world history, the “black” civilizations have been BY FAR the least aggressive. Alexander was not “black”. Genghis Khan was not “black”. Not a single one of the colonial empires were “black”. “Blacks” did not introduce WMDs to the world, nor banking with all its economic consequences, nor industrialization with all its environmental consequences, nor democracy with all its sociopolitical consequences, and the list could go on for hours if I wanted (dont even get me started about the indescribable quantity of violence involving trillions of victims in meat/egg/dairy factories, again not introduced by “blacks”). “Blacks” certainly did not help to create Israel! In fact, NONE of the enormous problems in the world that we have to deal with today were created by “blacks”, NOT ONE. This is why I get angry whenever people trash “blacks”, one of the ethnicities LEAST responsible for the mess we’re currently in. I don’t care about ethnicity myself, but when others start talking about ethnicity first, I will always remind them which ethnicity is MOST responsible for the mess we’re currently in. (Hint: not “blacks”.)

“which race produced the most Aryans and the most advanced civilizations? It was the Caucasian race; mostly “White people” I would say.”

If that were the case, we should at least expect that Aryan movements in Europe would have been less persecuted than Aryan movements in other parts of the world. This is not the case. Look what happened to the Pythagoreans, the Cathars/Bogomils, and National Socialist Germany. You simply don’t know what you are talking about (despite supposedly spending hours reading the site).

“Jews use homosexuality to destroy morality and the family unit of Goy nations, which is my main reason I stand against it from being accepted and taught to our children as “normal”.”

Jews were the ones who introduced homophobia thousands of years ago! Read the Tanakh! Before Judaism, nobody cared! That’s what we need to get back to. The fact that you are homophobic shows you have bought into the Judaic worldview, and are thus unqualified to be a serious anti-Zionist. Serious anti-Zionism entails rejecting everything Judaic, including homophobia.

“denying nature”

If there is one thing we DO NOT do, it’s deny nature. If we denied nature, we would be talking about using education to improve everyone. We don’t. We talk about breeding first and education second.

“One can race-mix if they choose to, but others can refuse to do it and protect their children from doing so.”

In other words the children don’t get to choose. You’re not fooling anyone with your wordplay.

“I ask what is wrong with a White Nationalist who simply wants a future for White children in their own ethno state; wishing no harm on anyone else?”

I ask what is wrong with Israel.

“For you to deny these types of Whites, or any people, who are compassionate towards others and only want to be safe in their own homelands would make you a supremacist, by claiming they have no right to their own form of sovereignty and that they must live according to your anti-tribal standards.”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Hell, you even have a list of religions you want to destroy – how are you compassionate Aryans again?”

Compassion is not tolerance. Only those who lack compassion will tolerate cruelty.

“Jews want the whole world to be multicultural cesspool except for Israhell. You seem to want the same thing.”

No, we want to destroy Israel.

We are also against multiculturalism. We want to create a new culture. We merely allow individuals of all ethnic backgrounds to participate in this project.

Besides, who says Jews want the whole world multicultural??? I think they want non-Jewish ethnostates to form so that Israel won’t be the only ethnostate in the world and therefore will become harder to criticize. That’s why they are using multiculturalism to engineer a backlash against multiethnic society. We want to show that multiethnic society can work so long as it is not multicultural.

“But do you realize that multiculturalism is the PRECURSOR to all conflict?”

Make sure you tell that to the Incans. There they were with an entire ocean separating them from Spain, so no multiculturalism there! But then all of a sudden your favourite ethnicity came along and massacred them. TRIBALISM is the precursor to conflict.

“How can you have “racism” in a nation that has ONE race?”

Ask the people who massacred the Incans. As long as Spain was multiethnic (Andalus), the Incans were safe. The moment Spain became monoethnic again, the Incans were in trouble.

While you’re at it, ask any of the other colonial empires. Each one started as a monoethnic nation. Precisely because of this, each developed a tribal identity around their ethnicity, and colonialism was the result. You’re not even aware of this, and you call yourself a realist?

“How can you have religious conflict in a nation that is ONE religion?”

Again, ask the people who massacred the Incans.

“Wouldn’t it make more sense to solve both issues by allowing people to live among their own?”

And the next thing you know, they are massacring the Incans. That’s why Spain should have stayed Andalus.

“THAT is a permanent solution to these issues; tribalism/nationalism SOLVES them permanently.”

Tell that to the Incans.

“2.) Multiculturalism doesn’t work, and never will work, and is the precursor to all conflict. 3.) You cannot alter the immutable laws of nature because of your feelings; conflict is part of the natural order and is here to stay.”

Which is it? If conflict is part of the natural order, then it would not be ended by removing multiculturalism. But of course you don’t notice your self-contradiction because you didn’t think of any of these ideas yourself, you just read them at far-right blogs.

“each race/people/religion, should have their own homeland with borders and their own way of life.”

That was what we had hundreds of years ago. Ask the Incans what happened next.

“But it seems, after reading your site, you would not allow Tribalists to exist in their own lands because you claim that they would eventually be a threat”

Ask the Incans if you don’t believe me. Or the Palestinians.

“yet you fail to see that your multiethnic/racial/religious states are states that will produce conflict anyway, and ARE A THREAT THEMSELVES.”

A threat to Jews, and to people like yourself (Gentiles). That’s the point. What kind of anti-Zionists would we be if we do not intend to be a threat to Zionism? Again, do you bother to think before writing?

“Why do you preach against those tribalists/nationalists, who wish to form an ethnostate away from your kind?”

What do you want me to do, say Israel has a ‘right’ to exist?

“Jews, with their tribalism, have survived for thousands of years while other nations collapsed BECAUSE of race-mixing and multiculturalism.”

Jews have wreaked havoc around the world for thousands of years because of their tribalism, and now we have a chance to finish them off. You want to ruin this chance.

“you are actually supremacists that will not allow others to live how they wish”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“You say are against oppression, yet you have no qualms destroying those who you disagree with.”

I am against oppression, therefore I certainly have no qualms destroying oppressors.

“You say Aryans are people who have freedom and refuse slavery, so then you are destroyers if you wish to destroy all people who want their own type of freedom; like living in their own lands secluded from others…”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Would you wish to destroy the Amish for doing just that?”

I would destroy the Amish just for their tradition of torturing children (following the methods prescribed in the Tanakh) alone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amish_way_of_life#Child_discipline

“Also, I am not homophobic because I’m not afraid of gays or whatever, but I don’t think their lifestyle is healthy nor would I hope my children are gay so my lineage dies off.”

In other words, you view your children as Goys for the function of continuing your lineage. That is a selfish and exploitative attitude, which I have come to expect from people like yourself.

“Every species/organism on earth wants to ensure its bloodline continues and genes are passed on”

I point you to the giant pandas that are currently being raped by machines as we speak because they themselves have no interest in continuing their bloodlines but humans are forcing them to reproduce so that humans can derive pleasure from watching them in zoos.

“No parents are hoping their children are gay.”

It’s none of the parents’ business in the first place.

“I have a handful of gay friends and we get along because they aren’t running around forcing homosexual propaganda down my throat. Those who did, actually stopped being my friend because they could not accept that I didn’t agree with their lifestyle.”

I am willing to bet that they did not attempt to argue that “heterosexuality” is wrong. You, however, are arguing that “homosexuality” is wrong. Who is forcing stuff down whose throat?

“Do you believe a Christian bakery should be forced to bake a cake for a gay couple if it violates their beliefs?”

I believe it is deceptive for such a bakery to call itself “Christian”, since Jesus was not homophobic. They should not be forced to bake a cake for anyone, but if they refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple because the couple is gay, they should be required to describe their bakery as “Judaic” in all correspondence henceforth, and to put a Star of David on their door.

“you do realize that the Jews use the LGBT community to cause drama, so we agree with that point.”

The point is that it would be mechanically impossible for Jews to use the LGBT community to cause drama if homophobia were rejected. Therefore it is people like yourself who make it possible for Jewish tactics to so easily succeed.

“none of us have a problem with Japan.”

Japan is not an ethnostate. It does not legally restrict interethnic marriage. On the contrary, anyone who has one Japanese parent is automatically Japanese, irrespective of the ethnic background of the other parent (try to persuade your WN friends to adopt this policy and see how far you get), and even people with no Japanese ancestry can, and have, become Japanese. On the other hand, people with even 100% Japanese ancestry who have lived abroad are not necessarily welcome to return to Japan (notable example being Brazilians of Japanese descent), further demonstrating that ethnicity is not the priority.

“To give you some background I have only been aware of the “jewish problem” for about 2 years now”

Then I guess you weren’t around back in 2007-2009 when the first-generation post-9/11 anti-Zionist activists had established a solid non-racist anti-Zionist movement (culminating in the OWNP), and then crypto-Jews inundated us with WNs who contaminated our work by stealing our research but inverting our message from the need to end tribalism (Jews being tribalists and therefore the enemy of the world) to the need for “white” tribalism to RIVAL Jewish tribalism. I was around back then, which is why I know first-hand that WN is absolute poison to serious anti-Zionism. You are looking at the scene after Zionist agents have already come in and gone back out, having altered its essence.

This was our song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foTWkiIwg10

We might have won by now if not for WN.

“I stated I have compassion for all people and are willing to help them all, but I can’t do that if my people are destroyed now can I?”

On the contrary, it is realistically likely to come down to nuclear war if we are to destroy Israel (look up the Samson Option). Only those who are willing to risk destroying ‘their own’ people in order to simultaneously destroy Israel have any hope of destroying Israel.

“I do want to protect my people from genocide.”

Jews tell me the same thing. I don’t take them seriously either.

“I don’t’ agree with flooding Whiten nations with Islam and non-Whites etc. I don’t’ agree with affirmative action and racial quotas…Do you?”

I believe everyone should be allowed to live where they want, since none of us choose where we were born. I oppose the Mexica Movement that wants “white” Americans to be expelled from America, just as I oppose Golden Dawn that wants “non-white” Europeans to be expelled from Europe.

I am against quotas.

I am also against BobWhitakerisms such as “flooding” to describe entirely voluntary migration by individuals and “genocide” to describe entirely voluntary interethnic marriage by individuals. (I bet it was Bob Whitaker who taught you to throw Japan at me also.) You call me condescending, but I assure you there is nothing more condescending than using BobWhitakerisms in a serious discussion.

“And yes, the West colonized and do bad things, sure…But I was not there for that nor would I condone such things today.”

Which is why, if you are a “white” American, I would fight for you to be allowed to continue living in America if you wish to do so. I only despise you because you would not in return fight for “non-white” Europeans to continue living in Europe if they wish to do so.

“I do not agree with genocide; especially “white genocide” which is of my own people…”

I do not agree with using BobWhitakerisms in a serious discussion.

“Blacks are responsible for 92% of the interracial crime on whites. They rape white women at the rate of 30k per year with under 10 white men raping black women per year….the knock out game etc…”

Arrest and execute the criminals. What else do you expect me to say? Let innocent people take the blame? By the way, I don’t take FBI information at face value, since according to the FBI, al-Qaeda did 9/11.

“Are you telling me you will feel less safe in a White or Asian town than a Black town?”

Nobody is safe in a world with weapons that allow combat with no risk to the attacker, such as nukes, chemical/biological weapons, drones, sniper satellites and other remote-controlled devices, or even conventional explosives delivered by bomber aircraft or ballistic missiles (don’t get me started about chemtrails). Nobody is safe in a world filled with radioactive waste and smog and fluoridated water and toxic soil/building materials and oil spills that can’t be cleaned up and nuclear meltdowns that can’t be cleaned up. Nobody is safe in a world where people are shot up with vaccines since childhood. In fact, nobody is safe in a world where food is not grown locally. I suppose you want to tell me that all this is the fault of “blacks”.

Feeling safe has little to do with being safe. The Incans were probably feeling safe until your favourite ethnicity arrived and massacred them.

“Lets not forget the Irish slaves.”

I get along with many Irish nationalists because they refuse to self-identify as “white”, but instead stand in solidarity with fellow victims of the British Empire. I also like their welcoming attitude towards immigrants to Ireland, which they base on the reasoning that they should treat immigrants to Ireland as they would wish other countries treat Irish immigrants. This is the kind of attitude we desperately need more of these days. This is real nationalism.

“Blacks and Mexicans commit MOST of the crime in the US and they are a minority.”

According to feminists, men commit most of the crime, therefore let’s blame men as a whole! This is what you sound like to me. And I still don’t take FBI information at face value.

“But how many White towns do you know that are full of crime to the point people aren’t safe to walk the streets?”

Castile was so dangerous that even people on the other side of the ocean were not safe to walk the streets. Ask the Incans about it.

“So why is it wrong for someone who wants to live in an all-White town/state/country where they know crime would be less; the streets safer/ the women safer/ the children safer???”

Jews ask me the same thing with reference to Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Children of multiracial parents look nothing like them”

If JJ weren’t so busy he’d eat you alive on this point.

“The fact you promote Hitler all over this site you should realize he was against race-mixing and would only encourage to breed the best with the best”

That’s what we encourage. For example, I would not allow you to reproduce with any of our team members.

“had the Spanish not been among the Inca, they would have not been able to destroy them…which is my point.”

But in reality they did go there, which is my point. If ethnoseparatism worked, the monoethnic Spanish would have stayed in Spain. They didn’t. So you are wrong.

(By the way, the Incans themselves were not monoethnic, they were a multiethnic society including more than 200 formerly separate groups. So we have one multiethnic society (Andalus) and another multiethnic society (Inca Empire) living in peace on two sides of the ocean. Suddenly, one society becomes monoethnic (Spain) and then the next thing you know the other is wiped out despite the ocean separating them. Yet, according to you, multiethnic society is the problem?)

“If Israel minded her own business, I wouldn’t care if she wanted to exist; not being a parasite or destroying other nations. In fact, if every Jew went to Israel and cut themselves off from the rest of the planet, the Jewish question would be solved.”

That’s what they want you to think. The next thing you know, Jews will have built such a large technological edge over everyone else that they can conquer the world by pressing a button. That’s what they are working on in Israel right now. Every day we let Israel continue to exist, they move closer to this endgame.

“You do believe in sovereignty I hope.”

I believe in sovereignty in the original autocratic sense ie. the monarch is sovereign. I am nostalgic for the ancient world when simply knowing that an immigrant population has been welcomed as new citizens by the monarch is the only reason the rest of the citizenry needed to welcome them also. Whereas these days it’s all “We want a referendum!” and other democratic garbage.

Trivia:

Interesting trivia:

“Cow’s flesh, however, none of these [Libyan] tribes ever taste, but abstain from it for the same reason as the Egyptians, neither do they any of them breed swine. Even at Cyrene, the women think it wrong to eat the flesh of the cow, honoring in this Isis, the Egyptian goddess, whom they worship both with fasts and festivals. The Barcaean women abstain, not from cow’s flesh only, but also from the flesh of swine.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_mythology#Egyptian_deities

Humour from AW:

I like that we’ve managed to mention both types of Isis in this conversation.

Christianity from Hashtali:

the word “enemy” is a mistranslation of the original Greek “echthros” (plural: “echthroi”). “Ecthros” is actually somebody who hates you … Thus Jesus was saying love those who hate you, try to mend discord, try to help them. But he was not saying love those whom you hate

JJ vs another “Red Pill” junkie:

“Funny thing is you’re marching in lockstep with George Soros, Peter Sutherland and company who fully back the mass transposition of refugees and migrants to Europe.”

Zionists like Soros, etc. have caused conflict in the Middle East and support having the refugees come to Europe because they know that reactionaries like yourself will promote identitarianism to FURTHER DIVIDE non-Jews.

We on the other hand realize what the Zionists are trying to do and are attempting to PREVENT non-Jews from being further divided along ethnic lines. That’s what UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY means. Anyone who can’t see that inter-ethnic conflict between non-Jews only benefits Jews is not qualified to call themselves an anti-Zionist. (And anyone who immediately reacts to a crisis by turning to selfish identitarianism instead of selflessly extending a helping hand to fellow victims of Zionist violence is not qualified to say they have empathy either…)

You claim Jews are trying to elicit ‘extreme’ empathy in Europeans. Instead there has been a massive surge in the far right and widespread acceptance of racist attitudes. Do you really think Jews are dumb enough to “accidentally” mess up on such a grand scale? You are falling for their reverse-bluff.

“Western culture is not some monolithic thing. There are many variants to “Western” culture, all of which should be preserved in its unique forms.”

Should we preserve Jewish culture and the Jewish race simply because they exist (not to mention _their_ contributions to “Western” culture and all it’s derivatives)??? If not, why should Western cultures be preserved simply for existing?

We are idealists, we wish to remove ignoble elements from all cultures–fundamentally changing them. We do not wish to “preserve” anything.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 2 Comments

Rutuli 2017

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/822649/Italy-migrant-rescue-boats-EU-fails-European-Commission-refugees-Mediterranean-Italy

a group of far-right activists have chartered a boat in the Mediterranean to disrupt rescue missions.

Identitarian activists for the ‘Defend Europe’ campaign raised €65,000 to support efforts to impede humanitarian missions.

Defend Europe intends to follow search-and-rescue vessels, document their activities and ‘confront’ them by blockading them on the seas. The aim is to force the NGO ships to alter their routes, drain their financial and organisational resources, as well inspire others to support the mission.

Thousands of innocent people could drown every day if their missions are successful.

Are the NGO vessels ready to destroy the identitarian vessel as soon as they encounter it? If not, then the identitarians win. It is that simple. You cannot help the innocent without killing the bad guys. You cannot be a “rescue vessel” without also being a combat vessel, because how do you reach in time the people who need to be rescued without being ready to eliminate without delay those who are trying to obstruct you? Pacifism does not work, has never worked and will never work.

But does the False Left get this?

Nick Lowles, chief executive of HOPE not hate, said: “While the Identitarian movement has always used controversial and confrontational tactics the hiring of this ship is emblematic of a dangerous new confidence within the movement.

“The project also reveals an increasingly international threat, with key activists coming from across Europe while support, including financial, has flooded in from around the world.

“We will be monitoring the ship’s movements very closely and liaising with NGOs and supporters over the coming months to ensure the relevant authorities are aware of the situation. We will forge a coalition of progressive organisations to oppose this dangerous new development on our high seas.”

“Monitoring” does not kill identitarians. “Liasing” does not kill identitarians. “Ensuring awareness” does not kill identitarians. “Forging a coalition” does not kill identitarians. TORPEDOES would work. ROCKET-PROPELLED GRENADES might also work. SHOOTING THE IDENTITARIANS before they even board their ship could be another option. Unless you are talking openly about measures like these, you too are accountable for the thousands of innocent people drowning every day.

Identitarians also existed in myth:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutuli

Thought to have been descended from the Umbri and the Pelasgians

In Virgil’s Aeneid, and also according to Livy,[4] the Rutuli are led by Turnus, a young prince to whom Latinus, king of the Latins, had promised the hand of his daughter Lavinia in marriage. When the Trojans arrived in Italy, Latinus [Note: great-grandson of Saturn, by no coincidence] decided to give his daughter to Aeneas because of instructions he had received from the gods to marry his daughter to a foreigner. Turnus was outraged and led his people as well as several other Italian tribes against the Trojans in war.

This is how we dealt with them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnus

Turnus begs Aeneas either to spare him or give his body back to his people. Aeneas considers but upon seeing the belt of Pallas on Turnus, he is consumed by rage and finishes him off. The last line of the poem describes Turnus’ unhappy passage into the Underworld.

Aeneas > Nick Lowles

Hate > Hope

“He who cannot hate the Devil cannot love God.” – Joseph Goebbels

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 26 Comments

Spot the non-false-flag vehicular attack

Lahouaiej-Bouhlel was shot and killed by police

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_attack

he was killed in a shootout with police

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Berlin_attack

 He was then shot by an armed police officer and died at the scene.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Westminster_attack

The three attackers, who wore fake explosive vests, were all shot dead by police.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Bridge_attack

One person has been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finsbury_Park_attack

Can you figure out what is going on?

As I was saying earlier, just because the UK does not have a far-right party threatening to enter government does not imply that it has nothing to worry about. Islamophobia is spreading in the UK no less than elsewhere. Attacks on Muslims will happen again and again until Islamophobia is utterly crushed. (False flag attacks blamed on Muslims will also happen again and again so long as they continue to be useful in perpetuating Islamophobia.)

Some on our side believe that it is pointless to try to debate with convinced Islamophobes, and if they mean that the convinced Islamophobes are beyond redemption and will simply have to be fought physically sooner or later, they would be correct (which is why I keep telling Muslims to equip, train and organize paramilitarily). But what I keep having to remind these people is that when we debate, we are trying not so much to change the mind of our opponents themselves, but mostly to win over the fence-sitters. The convinced Islamophobes are indeed write-offs, but there are many more who are still digesting the propaganda of both sides and who have yet to make up their minds on the issue. It is for the sake of this latter group that we debate. By giving up on them, we are effectively handing these people over to the enemy for free, and additionally those whom they in turn as propagandists might influence subsequently. So do not give up on them. Prepare for physical combat, sure, but also continue the propaganda war. Each one person whom we can dissuade through propaganda from becoming Islamophobic today is one less person whom we will have to fight physically tomorrow. Each one person whom we can persuade through propaganda to become actively anti-Islamophobic today could potentially be one more person who will fight physically alongside us against the Islamophobes tomorrow.

“The ink of scholars will be weighed in the scale with the blood of martyrs.” – Mohammed

As for the method of propaganda, it should be obvious by now that the antifa and broader False Left approach of ridiculing the enemy’s technical competence is almost the worst possible approach there is. Painting a portrait of the enemy as technically incompetent only leads those on our own side to dangerously underestimate them. Since we are preparing for an eventual physical confrontation against the Islamophobes, this is a path to almost certain ruin.

“It was, for example, a fundamental mistake to ridicule the worth of the enemy as the Austrian and German comic papers made a chief point of doing in their propaganda. The very principle here is a mistaken one; for, when they came face to face with the enemy, our soldiers had quite a different impression. Therefore, the mistake had disastrous results. Once the German soldier realised what a tough enemy he had to fight, he felt that he had been deceived by the manufacturers of the information which had been given him. Therefore, instead of strengthening and stimulating his fighting spirit, this information had quite the contrary effect. Finally he lost heart. On the other hand, British and American war propaganda was psychologically efficient. By picturing the Germans to their own people as Barbarians and Huns, they were preparing their soldiers for the horrors of war and safeguarding them against illusions. … Thus the British soldier was never allowed to feel that the information which he received at home was untrue. Unfortunately the opposite was the case with the Germans, who finally wound up by rejecting everything from home as pure swindle and humbug.” – Adolf Hitler

We already saw what happened in the US when the False Left spent the entire election season complacently laughing at how Trump believed he could actually win, instead of taking his chances seriously. We are still reeling from the consequences of that. Yet we have the same False Left today laughing at how our enemies are just a “tiny number” of “lonely basement dwellers” who “do not realize it is [current year]“. No! Our enemies have the ability to organize blockades of NGO vessels to reduce their chances of rescuing drowning refugees in time! Our enemies have the ability to burn down hundreds of asylum centres! Our enemies have the ability to pull off the Colohoax! Our enemies represent Western civilization itself, which a century ago had come close to colonizing the entire planet! Stop underestimating them!

First question for False Leftists: if our enemies really are a “tiny number” of “lonely basement dwellers”, then who are holding all these flags?

Second question for False Leftists: are you deliberately trying to get our side slaughtered?

Western civilization must die. Western civilization will not die unless we get absolutely serious about actively killing it, which begins with ridding our side of every last wishful delusion that it will die on its own.

By the way, if anyone claims that people of whatever minority ethnic group in the UK are “not British”, remember that the quickest way to shut them up is to show them this picture:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/The_British_Empire_Anachronous.png

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 16 Comments

Bifroest defended in Nuernberg!

“The values we espoused: comradeship, readiness to support one another, bravery, self-discipline, and not least honour and loyalty.” – Jutta Ruediger

Last year I called for the defence of Bifroest:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/support-lisbeth-zornig/

This year:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh9Ex3pX7Qg

Our enemies thought they had Germany in the bag after the Colohoax. They were wrong. The Aesir will not go down so easily. This is what I have been waiting for: the members of a local community, in this case a trade school, coming together to defend a friend from unfair treatment, unafraid to use Ahimsa against Merkel’s version of Rehabs.

Germans need to keep this up and become totally ruthless in their Ahimsa. Nine Rehabs (remember, real police officers do not deport people) were injured this time, which is not bad for a first try but nowhere near good enough to achieve practical results, which is what serious activism is supposed to do. Nine Rehabs dead would be more appropriate if the aim is to get a clear message point across to the Merkel regime about how important the refugee issue is. If nine Rehabs had to die for every one deportation attempt, the Merkel regime would run out of Rehabs well before Bifroest runs out of refugees. And it goes without saying that PEGIDA, GI and any other Splatterpunks targeting refugees must be dealt with similarly. This is what it takes to truly protect refugees; anything less resolute should expect to fail. Let’s hope they do better next time. To do so, they need to train in group combat tactics, and purchase effective weapons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gungnir

I would love to hear from anyone who was part of this defence operation, or anyone else who envisage similar operations potentially being required in your local area. Please send in a contact form:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

We offer not only organizational and preparatory advice, but deep ideology, which is no less important to winning fights.

“The lack of a great idea which would re-shape things anew has always meant a limitation in fighting power. The conviction of the right to employ even the most brutal weapons is always associated with an ardent faith in the necessity for a new and revolutionary transformation of the world. A movement which does not fight for such high aims and ideals will never have recourse to extreme means.” – Adolf Hitler

Meanwhile, this is going on over in the Alt-Right blogosphere:

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 4 Comments

A need for sanity

About the Manchester false flag, Veterans Today has it covered (scapegoat’s suspect’s ID found on location as usual!):

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/05/23/man22/

This line from their article summarizes the surreal world we now live in:

Even CNN is calling this a likely false flag! And get this – Infowars is OUTRAGED! Has the world turned upside down?

Seriously, digest this for a moment. Whereas the mainstream media has finally been forced to consider serious conspiratorial possibilities that they used to ignore (but which we have been tirelessly educating people about ever since 9/11) in order to maintain their own credibility, Alex Jones & Co. who back in the 2000s used to imagine gargantuan, NWO-masterminded, “they-want-to-insert-a-microchip-inside-your-brain-and-maybe-they-already-have” schemes behind every news event would now rather believe the official story blaming Muslims. Quite simply, we live in an age of inversion. In fact JJ and I were discussing in private the topic of also aesthetic inversion in the present-day world, where our enemies positively prefer to depict themselves as visually ugly (most often as Pepe). Here is an excerpt:

Honestly, if I had never heard of the Alt-Right and I saw a picture like this one which clearly depicts Trump and Le Pen as bullies:

https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7938727/pepe_le_pen_trump.jpg

I would have assumed that it had been made by leftists attempting to make them look bad. Yet in fact this is a picture made by rightists to make them look good! This is how the Alt-Right has inverted everything. Here are more examples; in a sane world, we would have assumed that these were made to mock Trump and Le Pen:

http://40.media.tumblr.com/e9684bcabfacb04b2363df2ea87dbb57/tumblr_o08q6xdyeQ1v33hszo1_1280.png
https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/53112451/_yJDklO6vlGrXCUaTbsPcwixvZlty4Sux9I0qwrk_6c.0.jpg

Yet in the Alt-Right worldview this is praise! Do you see how insane they are making the world? Another example:

http://cdn.redalertpolitics.com/files/2016/08/pepe-trump.jpg

Any sane person would assume that this is pro-Clinton propaganda, yet this is actually pro-Trump propaganda!

This is all about aesthetics. The moment we succeed in flipping people back to appreciation for beauty, the Alt-Right has shot itself in the foot because its overt promotion of ugliness is already on the record and cannot be swept under the rug. Just openly showcasing Alt-Right propaganda as “degenerate art” will suffice, contrasting it with pre-9/11 iconic imagery, just as National Socialist Germany used to do! How about starting a blog dedicated to this? Can you find someone (preferably an American, since the Alt-Right is based in the US) among your contacts for this project?

We need to be the ones to stay sane in times like these so we can eventually guide others back to sanity. This is our most important task throughout these tribulating times. If you would like to help us, please send in a contact form:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

After a long period of indecision, I have decided to pull the ZC and BS Lists for now. Ever since the Alt-Right exploded into mainstream awareness, the number of propagandists who would fit these lists has grown so large that it has become not only impractical to keep track of all of them (plus it would be inaccurate to call all non-Jewish ZCs or BSs these days “Gentiles”, since the Alt-Right has been recruiting heavily from the raceless), but ultimately also pointless (or even confusing to newcomers) in an era where the emerging trends have not divided cleanly between ZC and BS, but rather merged into something less coherent than either. Given the wide familiarity with ((())) notation, Jew-awareness is pretty much mainstream, so there remains little of the old Jew-blind ZC. Yet, at the same time, the issue of Jewish power is no longer considered to be the centre of attention. Instead, feminism, LGBT and other gender-related issues are presented by the Alt-Right as the real issues (in relation to which Jewish power is portrayed as a mere detail) - very different from the old BS narrative. The ZC and BS Lists will still exist, just set to ‘Private’ until further notice. In the meantime I will think about what can be done with them. One possibility is to delete all the non-Jews and simply re-release them as lists of  Zionist agents who had been the vanguard for pushing these attitudes in the early post-9/11 years until enough Gentile (and, more recently, raceless) useful idiots took over from them. What do you guys think?

Anyway, the backlash continues to build, and Muslims are bearing the most immediate brunt of it. Consider the following fiction excerpt from our enemies displaying what they fantasize about:

It surprised everybody how fast the French could build concentration camps when they put their minds to it. This led to even more car bombs and rocket attacks, until the French used heavy artillery on the no-go zones. Leveled them. Parts of Paris and the other French cities look like Stalingrad now, but at least they’re one hundred percent French again. Well, in the north, anyway.”

I said, “There must have been a lot of civilian casualties. When push comes to shove, Muslims always use their women and children as human shields.”

“They did — they always do — but this time it didn’t work. Not when the French were in a fight for their national survival. It doesn’t work at all anymore, actually, their hiding behind human shields. The problem with that strategy is that sooner or later somebody calls your bluff, and that’s exactly what the French military did. And being concentrated in Muslim enclaves, in their no-go Sharia zones, well, that vastly simplified matters when it came time to take care of business and end the mess once and for all.”

http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/12/bastille-day-in-the-caliphate/

This increasing popularity of Turner-Diaries-style novels:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/blm-bds-allied/comment-page-1/#comment-171668

is not something to take lightly. I can only recommend all Muslims and those who sympathize with them in any country where Islamophobia is on the rise to not become complacent about your safety, but to get equipped and trained to defend yourselves in the event of any far-right violence targeting you. Above all, you must hold your ground. Do not be tempted to leave just because of Islamophobia, for that is exactly what the Islamophobes (and the Zionists behind them) want you to do.

Amidst our relief that France dodged Le Pen this time, it is my sober duty to point that dodging one bullet after another is not the answer. We are only giving the shooter additional target practice while at the same time tiring ourselves out ducking and weaving, and under such a setup it is only a matter of time before we get hit. In fact, we already got hit with Trump, and we are now dodging bullets while limping and bleeding from the bullet hole (if not for Trump, Le Pen wouldn’t even have reached the second round), with the limping making the bleeding worse. The shooter is not going to run out of ammunition any time soon, and even if we manage to keep dodging, we could easily still bleed to death. What we need to do is grab the gun, kill the shooter, give ourselves first-aid ASAP, and then destroy the enemy’s ammunition factory.

Now is the time to step up attacks on the rest of the Alt-Right rhetoric, but this is the opposite of what is being done by most leftists at present. Following Macron’s win, I have noticed with worry many False Leftists adopting Alt-Right-originated insults for use against the Alt-Right (e.g. “Rightist snowflakes”, “Rightist tears taste delicious.” etc.. This is appalling, and reveals only how the Alt-Right has corrupted leftist minds with their attitudes. (To a much milder extent we have seen this phenomenon even on our own blog, like that time when I had to step in to remind Pandorastop that “small penis” is a compliment, not an insult, in our worldview.)

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/its-not-that-difficult/comment-page-3/#comment-172934 (also read BO’s reaction and my further elaboration)

Just as – as shown above - the Alt-Right has (quite appropriately!) chosen what should strike us as a supremely ugly face (Pepe’s) to represent itself visually, similarly the Alt-Right has chosen to characterize itself by attributes that leftists are supposed to be disgusted by: insensitivity, maturity, high sexual dimorphism, etc.. When False Leftists today, instead of reacting by deliberately flaunting their sensitivity, their neoteny, their low sexual dimorphism, etc. (like I frequently demonstrate here - not because I want to show off, but purely to provide examples of how it is done) in order to accentuate the differences between left and right, prefer to ludicrously accuse rightists(!) of sensitivity(!), neoteny(!), low sexual dimorphism(!), etc., and hence suggesting that insensitivity, maturity, high sexual dimorphism, etc. actually belong to the left(!!!), that is every bit as screwed up as CIs accusing Jews of being “fake Israelites” and claiming that they themselves are the “real Israelites”. This has been the case not only in the context of Macron vs Le Pen, but also in the ongoing False Left critique of the Trump administration, where every time (ie. every day) Trump behaves like the hyper-virile Paleolithic Giant alpha male he is, False Leftists do not call him that, but instead call him….. wait for it….. ”childish”. Even if they succeed in annoying rightists, they are on a much deeper level setting back the leftist cause just by reinforcing the traditionalist low opinion towards children. And the same is true of the other insults. It makes sense for rightists to use such insults because they are trying to devalue what we value. It does not make sense for leftists to use the same insults, because in effect we do the rightists’ work for them by doing so.

This is why I look forward to NS straightening all this stuff out with his new True Left site.

I am currently clearing an email backlog. For those expecting a reply from me, sorry for the delay, and please be patient. I will try to get there eventually.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 106 Comments

French election 2017

Six months ago, Trump was running against Clinton. Millions of Americans, despite disliking Trump, chose to abstain or to vote for a minor candidate because Clinton was considered to be “just as bad as Trump”, even though her campaign promises were nowhere near as scary. Today, as the Trump administration proves to be every bit as gruesome we had warned you it would be, everyone knows deep down that, whatever might have been the problems with a Clinton administration, it wouldn’t have even come close to comparing with the orange snuff horror porn that the entire world is now forced to wake up to every morning, all the while aware that JUST A LITTLE MORE AMERICAN VOTER VIGILANCE COULD HAVE PREVENTED IT. So I wonder: have the French learned a lesson from this as they go into the second round of their own election?

In the US, while the useful idiots were doing Pepe the Frog memes about Clinton being the Zionist pick and Trump somehow being the Zionists’ worst nightmare, we had been pointing out the rather obvious that, although Clinton doubtless would have been acceptable to the Zionist agenda, it was actually Trump who was by far the preferred Zionist candidate:

In France we see a similar pattern from the useful idiots. Macron is held to be the Zionist pick, while Le Pen is held to be somehow the Zionists’ worst nightmare. I don’t get it either:

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/french-far-right-leader-marine-le-pen-affirms-support-of-israel-1.353180

https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2017/03/08/the-le-pen-family-jesuits-jewish-boyfriends-and-mossad-daddies/

Apparently Le Pen is ’anti-Zionist’ because she promotes Islamophobia, and to the useful idiots these days, Islamophobia = ‘anti-Zionism’. Yes, they really think this. It must be all those Red Pills they swallow.

It is possible that the one-eyed creature is actually a Red Pill. (Thank you Miecz for the graphic.)

But how do we know that Le Pen is the actual Zionist pick? Because both Trump and Putin support her? Not to mention Wilders? Well, when we examine how the media has been herding the masses, it all becomes clear.

If we recall, election season began with Fillon bursting onto the scene and copying Le Pen’s Islamophobic, traditionalist rhetoric, and consequently being heavily promoted by the media as the front-runner. With both the far-right and the centre-right spouting such talking points, such ideas were psychopolitically mainstreamed. Once this was achieved, the media swiftly demolished Fillon with Penelopegate. Now all those who would not have been Islamophobes or traditionalists from listening to Le Pen alone, but who had been converted to these ideas via the apparently more moderate Fillon, have been left with no second round candidate but Le Pen to vote for.

Next, in the final stretch before the first round, the media suddenly hyped up Melenchon. What Melenchon has in common with Le Pen are anti-EU (and pro-Russia) views. Thus with the far-left as well as the far-right being anti-EU (and pro-Russia), being anti-EU (and pro-Russia) was psychopolitically standardized as the chief anti-establishment position. But the media knew all along that Melenchon had no real chance of getting to the second round given that Macron was absorbing most of the former PS voters. So with the first round over and Melenchon eliminated, which candidate alone remains for obsessive anti-establishment voters to vote for? Hmm……..

And let’s not forget the Champs-Elysees false flag shooting to make absolutely sure Le Pen would reach the second round…..

With these basic herding tricks that we should be familiar with by now, the media have conspired all the way to maximize the number of first-round Fillon/Melenchon voters who will vote Le Pen in the second round. All the while the same media have fooled the Red-Pilled useful idiots into believing that the media are behind Macron, just by throwing out a few useless fluff pieces about the history of the Macron-Trogneux couple (including deliberately unflattering photos of Trogneux to boot).

If the remainder French electorate have learned enough from the US election to not complacently repeat the American mistake of abstaining, it should still be enough to save France from Le Pen. But have they? We will have to see. (Even now as the media portray Macron as certain to win by a huge margin, all they are really doing is lulling would-be Macron voters to complacency and thus to not bother casting their votes on May 7th based on the assumption that others’ votes will comfortably suffice, while at the same time galvanizing every would-be Le Pen voter to vote in order to try for the long-shot result, thus once again boosting Le Pen’s chances by encouraging disparate turnout.)

As for Macron, there may not be much in his centrist platform that particularly appeals to us (he is no Corbyn; that’s for sure), but I would suggest that a presidential candidate prepared to take a hit to his own popularity during election season in order to pass ethical judgement on a historical event (when silence on the topic would have been safer) is worth at least a modicum of credit:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/18/macron-loses-lead-remarks-colonial-algeria-gay-marriage-spark/

Emmanuel Macron, the centrist French presidential contender, struggled to get his campaign back on track on Saturday after losing his poll lead over controversial remarks on France’s colonial record and gay marriage.

… 

Mr Macron provoked outrage on the Right by describing colonial rule as a “crime against humanity” during a visit to Algeria, once the jewel in France’s imperial crown.

And again, if anyone claims that people of whatever minority ethnic group in France are “not French”, remember that the quickest way to shut them up is to show them this picture:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/EmpireFrench.png

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 103 Comments