We have watched false flag after false flag – Nice truck attack, Wuerzburg axe attack, etc. – happening this month (again, note that in every such case the
scapegoats suspects are killed on the spot), and conspiracy blogs/channels have been working overtime pointing out suspicious elements in the official stories non-stop, and even some mainstream journalists are noticing these elements:
[Translated from French] Panic and incomprehension in the office of mayor of Nice. On Wednesday at 11am the Anti-Terrorism Sub-Directorate (SDAT) sent agents who manage video surveillance of the city a requisition citing Articles 53 and L706-24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article R642-1 of the Penal Code, asking them for a “complete” erasure of 24 hours of images from six cameras named and numbered, but also of all the scenes from the beginning of the attack that took place on the Promenade des Anglais, on the night of July 14.
“This is the first time we have been asked to destroy evidence.”
The state agents of the urban supervision center of Nice are stunned. “This is the first time we have been asked to destroy evidence,” says a source close to the investigation. “The CCTV center and the city of Nice could be prosecuted for this, and also the officers in charge of the device don’t have jurisdiction to engage in such operations.”
The request is all the more astonishing given that since last Friday the SDAT sent its servers to recover the 30,000 hours of CCTV related to the events. A backup operation that will extend over several days. “We do not know that giving a destruction order while we are in full backup is not going to affect the whole system,” the investigators say with concern.
“This was done in this particular case to prevent the uncontrolled spread of these images.” — The Paris prosecutor.
Contacted by Le Figaro, the Paris prosecutor’s office confirmed the information and said: “This was done in this case to prevent the uncontrolled and unchecked dissemination of these images.” The national police remind that “out of the thousand cameras in Nice, 140 had elements relevant to the investigation. The police recovered 100% of them. The Judicial Police and prosecutors have asked for the pictures from these 140 cameras to be deleted
(This is on a par with sending the metal from the collapsed WTC buildings to be melted down immediately after 9/11 so that they could not be examined to expose a controlled demolition. Anyone with a working mind can guess that in the truck attack they need to hide the switching out of the probable Mossad agent who actually drove the truck and the switching in of the shot-dead
scapegoat suspect. Similarly in the axe attack, the probable Mossad agent who actually did the attack was allowed to flee a distance of 1/2 km from the train (allowing ample time to switch him out) before police finally shot the scapegoat ‘him’.)
Nevertheless, none of this effort to expose the false flags is succeeding in turning around popular opinion, which continues to become more Islamophobic and hostile to refugees. Why? Because, once again, Jews understand (Gentile) majority psychology better than we do. In particular, they understand that the majority really do not believe that people are innocent until proven guilty, as already exemplified in the Colohoax (which, incidentally, most of the media continue to report as though a mere one-sided accusation of an attack means an attack actually happened e.g. 1200 people filing police reports alleging attack are unbelievably referred to as “1200 victims”):
It counts for virtually nothing how much work the clear-thinking minority put in to point out how the official stories simply do not add up: the prejudiced majority do not care about this. The inferior majority, once already incited into belief that a “Muslim refugee” did it (as they believe was the case in the axe attack as well as most of the Colohoax allegations), will cling to their prejudice despite all the holes in the official story being highlighted.
What the majority really believe is that people whom they regard as part of their out-group are guilty until proven innocent. As such, the only way to get the majority to even reconsider their position is hard evidence of innocence. And it is here that Zionists played their move well in advance, namely by preventing (via complicated international “human rights” laws) the states taking in refugees from putting the refugees to work, which is what states should be doing on ethical grounds anyway, as explained previously:
If the refugees were on state-organized labour shifts under rigorous 24-hour state supervision, they would have an incontrovertible alibi to protect them against subsequent Zionist scapegoating. It would be impossible to falsely accuse them of committing a crime since they would be able to prove that they were at a well-defined other location (namely their workplace) at the time when the crime occurred. By ensuring they are idle, the Zionist scheme is to preclude them from having a solid alibi, since it is now becomes hard for them to prove they were elsewhere at the time of the attack. This makes it easy to scapegoat them whether by false accusation (as in the Colohoax) or by false flag (as in recent attacks). If the refugees resort to testimony by other refugees whom they hang out with to prove they were elsewhere, this only further aids the Zionist agenda by now being able to accuse refugees for covering up for each other (and be believed by the prejudiced majority), thus fueling hostility towards refugees as a whole!
Which goes back to what we have been saying all along: it will take a supremely ethical ideology to truly defeat Zionism. Jews always start with structural unethicality in the system which they then manipulate to create mass hostility towards the wrong targets, and in such a way that no amount of subsequent exposure of the manipulation will suffice to dispel the hostility, because majority prejudice has already been set in place by the initial manipulation – as we saw after 9/11, as we see again recently, and as we will continue to see in more false flags and false accusations yet to come – all for the Zionist backlash agenda of increasing Islamophobia and thereby increasing support for the Israel-emulating far-right:
……………………………… OK, and now I have just read that another attack has happened in Munich literally while I was writing this post. Again, initial reports of at least three shooters have rapidly turned into an official story of yet another “lone gunman” who then conveniently ”killed himself” immediately after the attack. Can you figure out what is going on? More importantly, can you figure out what the inferior majority will surely continue to insist is going on despite our best attempts to explain otherwise? And most importantly of all, can you figure out who benefits?
BREAKING! Same Israeli photo-propagandist pre-positioned in Nice AND NOW MUNICH
What are the odds that a guy with the background of Richard Gutjahr – married to a leading Israeli black operator – would “just happen to be there” to film the very beginning of the Nice truck attack AND today’s shooting at the Olympia Mall in Munich, Germany? Coincidence theorists will have a field day with this!
As I wrote in my latest article on the Nice attack:
The cameraman apparently pre-placed on the balcony to film the beginning of the truck attack is German journalist and blogger named Richard Gutjahr…who just happens to be married to Israeli potentate Einat Wilf, a former Israeli Intelligence Officer in Unit 8200 who served as foreign policy advisor to Shimon Peres, strategic consultant to MacKenzie and Co. in New York, and a general partner in Core Venture Capital in Israel. In 2007 she ran for the presidency of the World Jewish Congress. (The presence of highly-placed Israelis and friends in strategic positions to film terror events is getting out of hand…we saw the same thing with the Charlie Hebdo and Brussels Airport events.)
And now he’s right in the middle of the shooting in Munich. Jim Dean is right, you can’t make this stuff up.