Support Sheikh Hasina!

Mainstream journalism is gradually catching up to what we have been saying for ages, namely that Westernized leaders in former colonial possessions are nothing but pieces of Eurocentric shit, and only non-Westernized leaders have any chance at all of coming through on our side when things get nasty:

Forget Aung San Suu Kyi. This is the Real Heroine of the Rohingya Crisis

though “the lady of Dhaka” may not translate as readily for Western consumption as “the lady of Yangon,” the Rohingya crisis is undoubtedly Hasina’s moment.

By accepting a large number of refugees in her poor and densely populated land, Hasina has shown greater compassion than many leaders from larger and richer countries. As Hasina said to me, “Bangladesh is not a rich country, but we have a big heart.”

While this is a politically risky move (as it could be spun to reinforce Myanmar’s claim that the Rohingya are merely undocumented immigrants from Bangladesh in the first place), now that the move has been made it should be supported.

It goes without saying that, unlike Zionist Myanmar, Bangladesh has never recognized Israel:

Now Bangladesh should also stop recognizing Myanmar (and Hungary, for that matter). The Rohingya massacre has provided more than sufficient evidence of Myanmar’s moral inferiority, for which it should now be militarily conquered as per Lebensraum, in order to restore to the Rohingya their homeland as well as provide Bangladesh itself with some much-needed additional territory that it deserves for its willingness to aid refugees. (It would also be a good chance for China to assist in the conquest to show its ability to keep regional order.) Conscientious individuals currently living in Myanmar should at the very minimum promptly emigrate in order to cease contributing to the Myanmar economy and paying taxes to the state. Those who have not emigrated by the time military invasion occurs deserve no mercy. Above all, the fake “Buddhists” in Myanmar:

who have actively led the persecution of the Rohingya need to be totally wiped out, as much for the sake of true Buddhism as for the sake of the Rohingya

But if Bangladesh, having received Rohingya refugees, yet lacks the courage to follow up by invading Myanmar, it will only embolden Myanmar to further step up the massacres in an attempt at total ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya from Myanmar. Thus, while we agree that Hasina has good intentions, we unlike mainstream journalism will not so easily call her a “heroine”, at least not until she demonstrates Lightning as well as Sun.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

German election 2017

In 2013 the AfD got 4.7%. This time they got 12.6%. Meanwhile, the spineless coward Merkel  in the months prior to the election has already buckled to AfD (and Hungarian) pressure by making it harder for asylum seekers to receive asylum. As I have said before, unless an enemy party’s support is decreasing by absolute measures, we have no reason to even begin to relax:

Mainstream journalists need to stop hysterically and inaccurately associating the AfD with the NSDAP. The AfD are pro-Israel, pro-Russia, pro-democracy (Swiss-style), anti-Islam, anti-EU and anti-renewable-energy, the exact opposite of the NSDAP. The best source for understanding the psyche of the AfD is their own official campaign poster, which I previously linked to:

but will repost for emphasis:

In other words, they explicitly equate being German with having no problem with butchering the pictured piglet. (Yes, they actually included a picture. What happened to the old days when even meat commercials used to at least avoid showing alive the animals – especially animal children - from which the meat comes?) To hold up cruelty to animals as a source of national pride goes way beyond merely practicing such cruelty in private; it is an attempt to embed acceptance of cruelty into collective consciousness.

(Islamophobes who support AfD are bound to retort that Muslim Germans, while not eating pork, are mostly not vegan either. This is true, but at least meat-eating is not something that Muslim leaders encourage their followers to take pride in, quite the contrary: )

In the same way, even back in the 90s which I often tend to speak of in glowing terms, racists surely existed. The difference between then and now is that racism back then was not held up as a source of pride (other than within Judaism, but even Jews kept it secret back then, which is why we didn’t know about it), unlike today. This goes back to the point made in the opening paragraphs of this page:

Few individuals throughout history have lived up to the ideal of universal compassion, but at least the ideal itself used to be outwardly admirable in ideological discourse. A clear sign of collapsing civilization and descent to barbarism is when tribalism is not only practiced (as it has always been by the vast majority), but actually promoted by reactionary movements as more admirable than universalism.

It is crucial that tribalism, including but not limited to racism, be put back in its place as an attitude of inferiority if revolution is to be positive. As Hitler said: “Whoever doesn’t become sickened and nauseated upon making a closer acquaintance with the Talmud can put himself on display in a circus side show.”

I would say that the party that produced the above AfD campaign poster above should be put on display in the same circus side show. The problem is that they have not been. Instead, they have been put in the Bundestag with 94 seats.

If Merkel were not following the Zionist script which requires enough refugees to psychopolitically fuel the AfD’s rise but not enough refugees to demographically offset it had any common sense at all, far from decreasing refugee intake (which only signals concession to the AfD platform), she would on the contrary MASSIVELY INCREASE refugee intake and get all refugees able to vote ASAP:

“Merkel put her career on the line to help us,” said Haidar’s 55-year-old husband Ayman. “We want to learn German and contribute to the success of this country through work, simply to prove that she was right and her opponents were wrong.”

On the other hand, these naive refugees may imagine a pristine proto-National-Socialist Germany in their heads:

“It is all one to us what their origin was, as long as they can work to the benefit of our nation. That is the deciding factor.” – Adolf Hitler

but realistically their work cannot begin until those who wish to indiscriminately drive them out of Germany are defeated with absolutely ruthless Ahimsa, the likes of which Merkel will never be willing to use:

“Violence is broken only by violence and terror by terror. Only then can a new regime be created by means of constructive work.” – Adolf Hitler

This is where we come in:

“It has invariably happened in the history of the world that formal State authority has failed to break a reign of terror which was inspired by a Weltanschhauung. It can only be conquered by a new and different Weltanschhauung whose representatives are quite as audacious and determined. The acknowledgment of this fact has always been very unpleasant for the bureaucrats who are the protectors of the State, but the fact remains nevertheless.” – Adolf Hitler

Another old post is worth revisiting at this time:

Over the past decades, the general trend is that, as the European Muslim population % has increased, so has the far-right vote %. It used to be that the far-right vote % remained lower than the Muslim population % in most EU member states, but over the last few years (due to much help from Zionist reverse-bluff propaganda campaigns to increase bigotry in general and Islamophobia in particular), the far-right vote % has been leapfrogging ahead of the Muslim population % in one EU member state after another. This fills the identitarians with confidence in winning a hypothetical civil war should one break out in the near future.

Germany was one of the few EU countries where, as recently as in the previous election, the far-right vote % was still lower than the Muslim population %. With this election, however, Germany too has crossed the threshold. So again I earnestly urge every anti-Islamophobe in Germany to study the linked post and accordingly prepare – train, equip and organize - for war. We also welcome contact forms if you need help with planning etc.:

Western Civilization must die.


Aside, at long last someone (in Greece, though, not in Germany) starts saying what I have been saying since Day 1 of the refugee crisis:

As covered previously, current EU refugee intake is pathetic compared to much poorer countries which are nevertheless doing much more:

And here is why the EU wants so few refugees:

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 68 Comments



Please give Marshal Kim a well-deserved round of applause. For this alone North Korea deserves to have as many nukes as it needs, and hopefully to re-acquire South Korea in the near future. (Of course, the more serious reason is that North Korea is one of the very few non-Muslim countries that does not recognize Israel, sending the important message that anti-Zionism is not just an issue for Muslims but should be an issue for all non-Jews.)

By the way, what’s taking the Dotard’s impeachment so long?

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 95 Comments

Statue removal etc.

I am glad to see that the calls for removing statues of colonial-era villains is expanding in scope beyond the initially narrow focus on Confederate figures only. For example, a statue of Columbus (Jew) is currently under consideration for removal (by no coincidence, Mayor Bill de Blasio is also a sanctuary city suppporter):

critics note [Columbus'] cruel treatment of the native inhabitants of the Caribbean and South America and his active participation in the slave trade.

Miecz previously posted a good documentary about Columbus:

which I recommend everyone check out and share widely (especially in relation to the Columbus statue issue).

The trend is also spreading beyond the US:

[Nelson] used his seat in the House of Lords and his position of huge influence to perpetuate the tyranny, serial rape and exploitation organised by West Indian planters, some of whom he counted among his closest friends.

Britain has committed unquantifiable acts of cultural terrorism – tearing down statues and palaces, and erasing the historical memory of other great civilisations during an imperial era whose supposed greatness we are now, so ironically, very precious about preserving intact.

And we knew what we were doing at the time. One detail that has always struck me is how, when the British destroyed the centuries-old Summer Palace in Beijing in 1860 and gave a little dog they’d stolen as a gift to Queen Victoria, she humorously named it “Looty”. This is one of the long list of things we are content to forget while sucking on the opium of “historical integrity” we claim our colonial statues represent.

Speaking of opium:

As usual, rightists ridiculously claim that leftists want statues removed as a way to somehow ”erase history”. Quite the opposite is true: far from wanting to erase history, we want to positively generate public interest in history. By bringing up this topic here, did I not just create an extra chance to share the documentary that Miecz posted earlier, as well as the Opium Wars links? To stress the point, let me also link again to JJ’s essay on the correct way to view the Confederacy, originally written in response to the Dylan Roof massacre:

In calling for removing statues of Columbus, Nelson and hopefully many more others to follow, we are not trying to make people forget that these historical figures ever existed; on the contrary, such highly publicized events would surely draw more attention to their names and get more laypeople finding out that Columbus was a Jew studying their significance in history (and, by extension, reading up on the horrors of the colonial era as a whole) than would otherwise have been the case. And this is the whole point. Moreover, in taking down monuments from their intended pedestals where they celebrate enemy greatness, we effectively transform them into ready-made symbols of our side’s ideological triumph.

Then I found this:

in June 1940 — during Nazi Germany’s attempted invasion of Britain — Hitler personally ordered the column’s transfer to Berlin along with its statue of Lord Horatio Nelson, the British admiral who defeated the French and the Spanish at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805. ”The Nelson Column represents for the English a symbol of British naval might and world dominion,” the book quotes Hitler as saying. ”It would be an impressive way of underlining the German victory if the Nelson Column were to be transferred to Berlin.”

This is consistent with Hitler’s famous quote:

“The Englishman can only respect someone who has first knocked him out.” – Adolf Hitler

There remain to this day many monuments to colonialists all over the world, particularly in former colonial possessions:


Now would be a good time for anti-colonialists (ie. nationalists in the true sense) everywhere to take joint action to remove every last one of these monuments, and through mutual support re-acknowledge our common struggle against oppression at the hands of of post-Renaissance Western civilization, as has already begun here:

Rhodes Must Fall (#RhodesMustFall) is a protest movement that began on 9 March 2015, originally directed against a statue at the University of Cape Town (UCT) that commemorates Cecil Rhodes.

On 25 April 2015, Mcebo Dlamini, then president of the Students’ Representative Council (SRC) of Wits University (a South African public research university), stated in a Facebook post that he “loves Adolf Hitler” … Dlamini later declared during a radio interview on PowerFM that “Jews are devils,” a remark which led the South African Jewish Board of Deputies to lay criminal charges of hate speech against him.

The correct question is not: why must these monuments be removed? The correct question should be: why were these monuments not removed immediately after colonial rule officially ended (whenever that might have been in each case)?

A positive additional question should be: what new statues and other monuments should be built to replace the removed ones? (Suggestions are welcome in the comments.) Remember our most important message to the Alt-Right: WE WILL REPLACE YOU. Today, statues. Tomorrow, Western civilization.

I almost forget to mention that all of these will have to be demolished one day:

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 116 Comments

Earth’s Form Reconsidered, the Mother of All Truths

 [Admin disclaimer: The claims of the following article are not endorsed by our movement. The author AryanAim, a former member who apparently acquired these views on cosmology during his several-year-long absence from us, chose (under no pressure from us) to resign shortly after posting this article. I have decided to keep the article public as a case study in the epistemological dangers of conspiracy theory. Among those like ourselves who question the official stories of particular highly politicized events - 9/11 and other Zionist false flag terror attacks, the 'Holocaust', the 'Colocaust', etc. - it can be tempting to suddenly start distrusting mainstream accounts in unrelated subjects also, and consequently to doubt mainstream versions of EVERY SUBJECT, and from here to become more easily convinced by alternative theories than one probably otherwise would have been. The result is as seen below, in the article and in the comment debate that follows. Please take heed.]

The first thing people tend to ask who haven’t considered the earth to be anything but what we’ve been told, is what does it matter? I want to state that before all such questions my primary concern always, before all else, is truth. So how can we know something is absolutely true? As subjective beings, I don’t think we really can; rather we can postulate what is most likely to be true by eliminating all that’s impossible.

Koreshans around their geodetic device

About two and a half years ago I stumbled upon scientific sources while web surfing that TV and school never broached. A man named Cyrus Teed in the late 1800s had an epiphany that we lived inside earth. He claimed earth is an enclosed, concave terrafirma that houses the universe, sun, moon, stars, planets, etc – inside of it. (Admittedly at first this came across as crazy to me). He called it the cellular cosmogony – the title of the book he and his friend Ulysses Grant Morrow wrote. (

Ulysses Morrow was a geodesist (earth surveyor), and he invented the device in the photo above to verify their claims. (

This was basically a 4 mile long level, along the Bay of Naples, Florida, whose results indeed verified their claims that the earth’s surface curves upward, not downward; that earth is of a cellular design. The findings showed earth to curve upward at same rate as it’s believed to curve downward; the math showing earth to be 25,000 mi in circumference – the same size as commonly believed.

But it wasn’t just one experiment that indicated the cellular cosmogony to be true. In 1901 J.B. Watson, the chief engineer at the Tamarack copper mine in Michigan suspended 4250 ft long plumb lines down mine shafts. The measurements showed the lines were farther apart from each other at the bottom than the top.

The balls were expected to move closer together towards the center of the Earth where the center of gravity should reside if it were a pull dependent on mass as Newton said it was


The rectilineator disproved earth’s convexity, and the Tamarack mine shaft experiment disproved Newton’s concept of gravity being a downward pull toward earth’s supposed center. Another experiment called Airy’s Failure was another simple test in attempt to prove the rotation of the earth, and failed. This was done with a telescope and water. Since light moves slower through water, G.B. Airy was able to observe the aberration of the stars through a telescope filled with water at a greater angle than filled with air. The findings were contrary to the Copernican theory of a revolving earth, showing the stars to be moving, not earth! (

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” – Nikola Tesla

The electric universe theory has come a way since Tesla, and what do you know, plasma physics and electromagnetism correlate with cellular cosmogony: Concave Earth Scientific Evidences

Here is visual proof of earth’s concavity, made possible via recent advanced zoom technology on cameras: Objects shown inclined in the distance

So what does this all mean? What about all the flat earth buzz? I’ve been following that noise too, and speculated the same thing that’s highlighted in the following post from Reddit – that flat earth theory is meant to misinform and distract from the truth. (

Is the flat earth craze a psyop? Possibly. All I know is the leader of the flat earth community, vegan self defense and yoga practitioner Eric Dubay, is almost an antithetic personality in contrast to the unofficial spokesperson for concave earth theory today – Steven Christopher, who actually calls himself the messiah “Steven Christ”. He’s literally the last guy you’d want representing a truth of this magnitude. One of several saving graces for cellular cosmogony is the network previously cited, the Wild Heretic:

Here you will find most your questions answered. The people who run that network write in a similar style as members of this network, just more science oriented. I would guess that many of you will enjoy what they have to say.

The following are illustrations of what I can confidently say is a more likely model of earth and the universe.

Light Bends

We are an Emanation of Life from a Central Source

Here’s a good visual of light bending…

I’m only now positing this discovery that just in the last year or so has spread among a growing minority of people (unfortunately hardly noticed since flat-earth has been blown up into the foreground) because I feel the time is right. Most take one look at “concave earth” and turn away once they find the Zionist shill occupying its cyberspace. Conversely, they take a few looks into mainstream mentioned flat-earth, and the likable Dubay is just too shrewd and correct on many things to consider the former. There are several damning fallacies with the flat earth model popular “scientists” like Freemason metaphysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson fail to even bring up when they’re “debunking” it. It’s almost like they want us to believe it’s flat!

This is the mother of all truths. I’d guess that at some level of the Zionist hierarchy it’s common knowledge. It’s basically the equivalent of hiding god. How this knowledge would change the collective consciousness of humanity may not be fathomable.

Since the Copernican era science has advanced considerably. We found that sound creates light! People began making assumptions based on a false assumption, like for example that the stars were “distant suns”. Scientific advancement, thanks much to Tesla’s work, has shown us more likely scenarios, based on actual experimentation, not mere theory. Sound creating light is called ‘sonoluminesence’ – a word internet spellcheck doesn’t recognize.

Stars are Bubbles of Light Created by Sound Frequency, Not Distant Suns


They also didn’t have hot air or weather balloons, or cameras then. The common fisheye lens today however distorts footage and photos, conveniently making earth’s horizon appear warped one way or the other. On the Red Bull Stratos jump, the one normal camera inside the pod shows a horizon slightly above the center of the large window from which Felix jumped. On a ball, the horizon would be several inches below the center of window. (

Despite advances in science, the assumption earth is one of the planets circling a large central sun, sustained. There are obvious discrepancies with the heliocentric model, like the fact we do not see a new sky of stars every six months when we’re supposedly on the other side of a central sun, in which case new stars should be seen at night the whole world-over. This of course doesn’t happen, because it’s the same star-map inside a central, revolving celestial sphere. Kind of like a big disco ball. The stars are bubbles of light in water, produced by the sound frequency of the heavens.

The sun itself is known in many scientific circles as electric, not a ‘nuclear furnace’, yet the dated theory is still taught in the mainstream media and school. The Thunderbolts Project team, while presumably not aware of earth’s concavity, have made advances in proving the electric nature the universe and sun through experiments and critical observations. Eric Dullard, a scientist who specializes in electricity and sound frequency, declares the sun to be electric: The Sun isn\’t What We\’ve Been Told

As Aryanists I feel there is a duty to truth, and I would not be posting this now if I wasn’t thoroughly convinced it is more than likely true. Please research for yourselves, do not fear telling others. Truth has nothing to fear from alternative views. I feel we are here to enlighten, to love, and to help guide others to the light out of this cell. Deep down, it is as everybody knows – “the world we live in”, not “the world we live on”. Godspeed Aryans.

Posted in AryanAim | 93 Comments

Heather Heyer RIP

Rachel Corrie, run over by an IDF bulldozer in 2003, has had streets named after her in Palestine and Iran. Will Heather Heyer, run over by a Trump train (technically a private car) in 2017, have streets named after her in the US (or perhaps, aptly, a statue of her to replace the Robert E. Lee statue that is meant to be taken down)? If the Alt-Right wins, she will surely not.

And the problem is that Heyer, and too many like her who are on our side, are not even close to ready to fight the Alt-Right. If Heyer had been ready, she would have brought a firearm to the Charlottesville rally, and it could have been vehicular identitarian James Fields who would be dead by now from her gunfire. Heyer’s choice of Facebook quote indicates moral but not necessarily strategic awareness. A better quote might be: “If you’re not trained and equipped to personally kill Alt-Right terrorists, you’re not paying attention.” Outrage as a reaction to injustice is of course better than no feeling, but outrage alone does not achieve anything (except prompt the Alt-Right to make snowflake jokes about us). Only outrage distilled into paramilitary discipline and readiness to use deadly Ahimsa achieves results in practice.

The Alt-Right themselves give away their own greatest fear in their main rally slogan: “You will not replace us.” What they fear is being replaced. Our slogan must not be that of the spineless Terry McAuliffe: “Go home … You are not wanted in this great commonwealth.” Why would McAuliffe expect the Alt-Right to obey(!!!) him? Any slogan phrased in the form of a demand to the enemy is structurally absurd, as the enemy by definition consists of those who do not care about our demands. No, our slogan must be phrased exactly as their slogan is phrased – as a statement of our own plan of action. Our slogan must confirm their fear. Our slogan should simply be: WE WILL REPLACE YOU.

An America with one fewer James Fields and one more Heather Heyer is self-evidently an incrementally better America. An America with a hundred million fewer racists (including all Jews) and a hundred million more anti-racists is self-evidently a phenomenally better America. This is replacement. Why are so many leftists still afraid to openly admit that we would like – very much indeed – to replace genetically inferior people with genetically superior people? The exercise of politics is the exercise of replacement! Is it not our wish to replace Donald Trump, Stephen Miller (Jew), Steve Bannon, etc. with politicians that we prefer? So how much sense does it make to aim for the replacement of the politicians but not of their support bases?

If you support Western civilization, WE WILL REPLACE YOU. It is our duty to do so.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 59 Comments

The birth of Turandom

I told you this would happen.

Get the full story from our enemy blog (please read the entire article and also the comments):

This summit represents a sea change in relations between Israel and the European Union. … The V4 and Israel have interests in common.

“The Hungarian point of view in this matter was: The European Union should value those efforts that the State of Israel makes for the stability of the region, which is not only in Israel’s interests but in Europe’s, too, because it protects us from newer and newer waves of migrant invasion.”

“Hungary was the, in many ways, the birth of modern Zionism, the movement that led to the establishment of the modern Jewish state because in Hungary was born our modern Moses, Theodore Herzl.”

Dismiss the danger of Turanian blood memory at the peril of everything we value. Turandom also exists in diaspora form:

The anti-immigration party trying to recruit immigrants

Although their manifesto calls for a near-total halt to immigration, the far-right political party Britain First is now actively trying to appeal to Polish immigrants.

Indeed it gathers explicitly by Turanian metabolism:

Some white supremacists think white ethnic identity has a geographic, historical correlation with the body’s tolerance for milk — specifically, the production of the lactase enzyme that allows humans to break down lactose.

For that matter, I also do not believe it to be mere coincidence that two out of three of Trump’s wives have heavy Turanian blood, and that his children then went on the marry Jews.

The best countermeasure to Turandom is Aryandom. Again I will let our enemy blog do the reporting for us:

On some schoolyards, it were normal to insult each other as “You Jew!”

He remembers statements by teachers after the attack on the Christmas Market in Berlin. Conspiracy theories immediately circulated among some pupils, according to which the attack was staged by the Jews and the USA, and the attacker Amri was a CIA agent who wanted to incite hatred towards Muslims.

Teachers lament that some pupils with an Arab background blacken out the state Israel in the atlas, and react extremely emotionally to the topic of Israel. Teachers reported to us that hatred for Israel is pretty strong with some pupils. Slogans such as: “Jews are murderers”, “they kill our children”, “they steal our land”.

Demography is destiny. These schoolchildren are the demographic that must grow throughout the EU to bring a better future for the whole world. They are the demographic that Turandom wants to eradicate. Are we ready to protect them?

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 9 Comments

VK Clark on ‘Table Talk’ fraudulence

[Admin disclaimer: The following article represents the views of Clark only. Our movement does not necessarily endorse these views.]

Genoud, Heim & Picker’s “Table Talk”: A Study in Academic Fraud & Scandal

By Weronika Kuzniar



Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source. There, I said it. And I’m not just saying this to evoke a reaction. I’m saying it because I really mean it. The renowned “Hitler expert” Lord Dacre, better known as Hugh Trevor-Roper, knowingly and willingly engaged in a massive cover-up regarding Hitler’s Table Talk (hereafter TT). Had it not been for the outstanding research at the low cost of just $50 taken up by historian Richard Carrier, we might still be in the dark about this, 64 years after TT’s first appearance in the English language. Sorry to bust this bubble, Hitler and Third Reich enthusiasts, but TT is worthless. In this article, I will establish three things: 1) that Hugh Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in academic fraud for profit and prestige, 2) that TT is a worthless primary source, and 3) that renowned Hitler “experts”, both Revisionist and Mainstream, have failed the public regarding reliable Hitler primary sources.

Whose “table talks”?

Before we commence, a brief word about the texts in question is necessary. The so-called “table talks” were written down by Martin Bormann’s aides, Heinrich Heim and Henry Picker, from 1941 to 1944. Aside from Heim and Picker, there are two more “table talk” authors, Bormann himself, “who contributed at least four entries, and a man known only as Müller.”

Mr. Picker was the first to publish his “table talks,” and he did so in German only. They were published as Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1942, in 1951 and 1963, respectively. His book included some of Heim’s notes that he happened to come across, and which he then altered for his book.

According to Nilsson, François Genoud, who we will discuss later, published the first volume of a French version of the “table talks” a year later, following that up with a second volume in 1954. This French version (henceforth LP) “was not based on the same German original as Picker’s… but on a second manuscript that had purportedly been acquired by Genoud, the so-called Bormann-Vermerke” (henceforth B-V5). And even though the “form, content and provenance of the [B-V] remain obscure,” historian David Irving attested to this manuscript’s authenticity nonetheless. Adds Nilsson, LP eventually contained both Heim’s and Picker’s notes in subsequent volumes and editions. Genoud then had LP translated into English, by which time it had been “expanded to cover the whole period from 1941 to the end of 1944, and to include all of Heim’s and Picker’s notes said to have been in Genoud’s possession.”

Writes Nilsson in this regard: The German text, which the French and English editions are said to be based upon, was, for reasons that are unclear, not published until 1980. It was given the title Monologe im Führerhauptquartier… This edition does not contain Picker’s notes either due to a struggle over intellectual property rights. It does not help that both Heim’s and Picker’s original manuscripts seem to have been lost.

So far, Mr. Carrier is the only historian who has compared these various “table talks” in a systematic way. His conclusions have exposed the English and French “table talks” as “highly questionable,” particularly if they are based on the same manuscript used for Genoud’s Monologe. The English “table talks,” Carrier reveals, are based in whole or part on Genoud’s LP, “and… both the English and French editions contain additions to, and mistranslations of, the German texts that they are supposedly based on.” Nilsson himself “address[es] certain questions related to the authenticity of the B-V, as well as the accuracy of the translations,”all of which is pertinent to most historians’ claim that Hitler is the author/originator of the “table talks.” As we will soon see, he was not.

Indeed, there is a whole lot of mystery and very little certainty surrounding “Hitler’s” supposed “table talks”.

Hugh Trevor-Roper’s failings

Let’s begin with Hugh Trevor-Roper. Contrary to his respectable and honest public image, Trevor-Roper knowingly and willingly engaged in deception and fraud behind the scenes. The Hitler Diaries, proven to be a fraud, were not a unique fail for Trevor-Roper. In fact, as Swedish historian Mikael Nilsson has demonstrated, Trevor-Roper had a long trail of academic fails that he hid from the public eye.

His first fail is The Testament of Adolf Hitler, also known as Hitlers politisches Testament, first published in French in 1959, and in English in 1961. David Irving, and other historians such as Ian Kershaw, exposed this document, which was “acquired” and doctored by the notorious Nazi apologist and document peddler François Genoud, as a fraud. A fake.

Not surprisingly, I was attacked on Facebook for declaring that “Hitler’s Table Talk” is a “fraud,” which it is. The first attack reads: “Hitler’s table talk a fraud? based on what? what a BS. Have you ever red in in the original version? It is totally impossible to fake such prestigious thoughts that jump in all directions, but always in depth and related,,, you can not [sic] fake that, especially as their [sic] is no goal in faking it, they make hitler look better and there is not even a prooof [sic] of gas chambers or whatsoever in it. BASIC LOGIC APPLIED Bitte.” The second attack reads: “Did you read it? No you didn’t. Nor has [C] here. No single argument in the content that proves it is a fraud either just a statement. Not even a ball pen argument like Anne Franck hoaxers. The table talks are ingenious remarks from a well thought person on a host of topics impossible to fake. Are there transcrition [sic] error or some augmented passages, possibly. But even then, for what agenda. There is NONE.”

(*note: portions of original article skipped here viewable in the following link [along with it in its entirety] – Wilk Mocy Publishers)

…We still have neo-nazis touting the TT in its own dedicated podcast series, episodes 1 through 56. One neo-nazi writes on her website:

• How trustworthy is this text, since Martin Bormann assigned two of his aides to take the notes during meals, then turn them over to him for “checking” and safekeeping;

• Why it is valuable to study this book;

• Questions about the translation and translators – for example, did François Genoud tamper with the parts about Christianity;

• Of those offended by this book, Christians are #1 on the list, complaining that it does not agree with Hitler’s “public record” of positive remarks about Christianity in earlier years;

• David Irving and Albert Speer both confirmed that these recorded talks are authentically Hitler; Richard Carrier disagrees;

• Next week we’ll begin reading the text.

Indeed, the only aspect of TT with which most neo-nazis disagree is a few select entries about Christianity. Everything else is “legit” in their collective opinion. TT remains the most highly valued text next to Mein Kampf, also the result of extensive editing and external influence (such as that of Rudolf Hess and Max Amann), in the White Nationalist, Hitler worshiping community. We therefore owe it to these groups, and to the public at large, to tell them the truth about this text. It is not the words of Adolf Hitler.

(…continue article here: Wilk Mocy Publishers / Powerwolf Publications)

Posted in Other | 8 Comments

Summer cleaning

So, what I’ve done is merged the old ZC and BS Lists into a single Backlash Herders page, which now lists only Jews:

As previously discussed, the non-Jews have become far too numerous to keep up with. Which in itself is the clearest sign we have of how big the backlash has become. We need your help to stop it. If you want to help us, please send in a contact form:

Because the Backlash Herders page was made by transplanting the BS Jews over into the old ZC List, this means that the comments section of the page is that of the old ZC List. However, I noted that there were some valuable discussions in the comments section of the old (now removed) BS List, so I have decided to repost select edited comment excerpts in this post. Hopefully newcomers and regulars alike can benefit from revisiting these old discussions and perhaps even further elaborating on the arguments involved; I have put in bold my personal favourite parts. Please also take this opportunity to discuss anti-backlash argumentation tactics in general. If you have encountered enemy arguments that you have trouble dealing with, please feel welcome to post them below in case someone else might be able to suggest good counterarguments to them.

AS vs “Red Pill” junkie:

“You claim that tribalism, which is natural, is exactly what the Jews want us to practice. Well, why do they preach communism across the globe?”

Because communism is the tribalism of proles. By the way, they have not preached communism for several decades. The more recent involvement of Jews is with far-right politics.

“Why do they condemn all forms of Tribalism other than their own?”

They do not. They promote it. One way by which they promote it is to make it non-PC, so that useful idiots like yourself then think you are rebelling when you are actually following the Zionist script.

But it is universalist ideologies which Jews have truly opposed throughout history, because only universalist ideologies expose the inferiority of Judaism (a tribalist religion) and hence of Jews themselves in comparison. Gentile tribalist ideologies, on the other hand, normalize Judaism and hence remove the motivation to destroy it.

“Whites pose the greatest threat to World Jewry.”

LOL! In an alternate world history where “whites” never existed, would Jews be more powerful or less powerful than they are today?

“It seems that YOU are helping the Zionist cause by preaching anti-tribalism”

Remember to tell that to Jesus also. Only universalists are able to despise tribalists with the intensity required to not rest until they have been wiped out. That is what we need to destroy Zionism, not more tribes in addition to Jews (which just spreads the disease)!

“The second I read that you are anti-tribalism (not allowing human beings to group naturally with others like them)”

I am currently grouping with people like myself (other universalists); the hint is in our motto: UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY. That is folkism, not tribalism. Do you see the difference? Two tribalists from different tribes may share a belief in tribalism, but this shared belief does not unite them, instead it sets them against each other. Two universalists, in contrast, are united by their shared belief in universalism.

“You say race doesn’t matter”

We say race matters. “Whiteness” is what doesn’t matter.

“and that as long as “Aryans” carry “the torch” it doesn’t matter what “team” they are from?”

And that is what we mean by race.

“Well then why do you exclude Jews?”

Because they are tribalists.

“Is it because of their racial makeup or soul?”

Both. Any group which lives among another larger group for multiple generations (as Jews have done for several thousand years) and still exists as a distinct identity has surely selected for genetic tendencies towards tribalism within its own members (since any non-tribalists among them would have integrated, so each new unintegrated generation will be more tribalistic than the generation before). Therefore even an individual Jew today who claims to be universalist should not be trusted, unless he voluntarily refuses to reproduce (as Jesus did).

“Then I could argue Blacks and other races who have lower IQs and more of a genetic propensity for violence etc., couldn’t be Aryans either.”

If “blacks” had a consistent historical record of refusing integration, then we would treat them no differently than Jews. (Indeed this is why National Socialism is hostile to Gypsies.) But that’s not the case for “blacks” at all. Wherever welcomed, “blacks” have always enthusiastically integrated. WNs implicitly admit this every time they complain about “black” men having sex with “white” women! (Portugal, for example, once had a “black” community which has since been fully absorbed into the population.) Wherever “blacks” remain unintegrated, it is invariably because others took measures to keep them segregated. In the US, for example, it was “white”, not “black”, Americans who passed Jim Crow laws. Indeed the very fact that “blackness” is defined as possessing any quantity of “black” ancestry shows clearly that the concept of “blackness” is fundamentally integrationist. The same cannot be said for “whiteness”, which is defined not by possession of “white” ancestry but by non-possession of “non-white” ancestry (a.k.a. the One Drop Rule).

If IQ were the qualification for being Aryan, Jews would be the most Aryan of all.

As for genetic propensity for violence, you have to be fucking kidding me. In world history, the “black” civilizations have been BY FAR the least aggressive. Alexander was not “black”. Genghis Khan was not “black”. Not a single one of the colonial empires were “black”. “Blacks” did not introduce WMDs to the world, nor banking with all its economic consequences, nor industrialization with all its environmental consequences, nor democracy with all its sociopolitical consequences, and the list could go on for hours if I wanted (dont even get me started about the indescribable quantity of violence involving trillions of victims in meat/egg/dairy factories, again not introduced by “blacks”). “Blacks” certainly did not help to create Israel! In fact, NONE of the enormous problems in the world that we have to deal with today were created by “blacks”, NOT ONE. This is why I get angry whenever people trash “blacks”, one of the ethnicities LEAST responsible for the mess we’re currently in. I don’t care about ethnicity myself, but when others start talking about ethnicity first, I will always remind them which ethnicity is MOST responsible for the mess we’re currently in. (Hint: not “blacks”.)

“which race produced the most Aryans and the most advanced civilizations? It was the Caucasian race; mostly “White people” I would say.”

If that were the case, we should at least expect that Aryan movements in Europe would have been less persecuted than Aryan movements in other parts of the world. This is not the case. Look what happened to the Pythagoreans, the Cathars/Bogomils, and National Socialist Germany. You simply don’t know what you are talking about (despite supposedly spending hours reading the site).

“Jews use homosexuality to destroy morality and the family unit of Goy nations, which is my main reason I stand against it from being accepted and taught to our children as “normal”.”

Jews were the ones who introduced homophobia thousands of years ago! Read the Tanakh! Before Judaism, nobody cared! That’s what we need to get back to. The fact that you are homophobic shows you have bought into the Judaic worldview, and are thus unqualified to be a serious anti-Zionist. Serious anti-Zionism entails rejecting everything Judaic, including homophobia.

“denying nature”

If there is one thing we DO NOT do, it’s deny nature. If we denied nature, we would be talking about using education to improve everyone. We don’t. We talk about breeding first and education second.

“One can race-mix if they choose to, but others can refuse to do it and protect their children from doing so.”

In other words the children don’t get to choose. You’re not fooling anyone with your wordplay.

“I ask what is wrong with a White Nationalist who simply wants a future for White children in their own ethno state; wishing no harm on anyone else?”

I ask what is wrong with Israel.

“For you to deny these types of Whites, or any people, who are compassionate towards others and only want to be safe in their own homelands would make you a supremacist, by claiming they have no right to their own form of sovereignty and that they must live according to your anti-tribal standards.”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Hell, you even have a list of religions you want to destroy – how are you compassionate Aryans again?”

Compassion is not tolerance. Only those who lack compassion will tolerate cruelty.

“Jews want the whole world to be multicultural cesspool except for Israhell. You seem to want the same thing.”

No, we want to destroy Israel.

We are also against multiculturalism. We want to create a new culture. We merely allow individuals of all ethnic backgrounds to participate in this project.

Besides, who says Jews want the whole world multicultural??? I think they want non-Jewish ethnostates to form so that Israel won’t be the only ethnostate in the world and therefore will become harder to criticize. That’s why they are using multiculturalism to engineer a backlash against multiethnic society. We want to show that multiethnic society can work so long as it is not multicultural.

“But do you realize that multiculturalism is the PRECURSOR to all conflict?”

Make sure you tell that to the Incans. There they were with an entire ocean separating them from Spain, so no multiculturalism there! But then all of a sudden your favourite ethnicity came along and massacred them. TRIBALISM is the precursor to conflict.

“How can you have “racism” in a nation that has ONE race?”

Ask the people who massacred the Incans. As long as Spain was multiethnic (Andalus), the Incans were safe. The moment Spain became monoethnic again, the Incans were in trouble.

While you’re at it, ask any of the other colonial empires. Each one started as a monoethnic nation. Precisely because of this, each developed a tribal identity around their ethnicity, and colonialism was the result. You’re not even aware of this, and you call yourself a realist?

“How can you have religious conflict in a nation that is ONE religion?”

Again, ask the people who massacred the Incans.

“Wouldn’t it make more sense to solve both issues by allowing people to live among their own?”

And the next thing you know, they are massacring the Incans. That’s why Spain should have stayed Andalus.

“THAT is a permanent solution to these issues; tribalism/nationalism SOLVES them permanently.”

Tell that to the Incans.

“2.) Multiculturalism doesn’t work, and never will work, and is the precursor to all conflict. 3.) You cannot alter the immutable laws of nature because of your feelings; conflict is part of the natural order and is here to stay.”

Which is it? If conflict is part of the natural order, then it would not be ended by removing multiculturalism. But of course you don’t notice your self-contradiction because you didn’t think of any of these ideas yourself, you just read them at far-right blogs.

“each race/people/religion, should have their own homeland with borders and their own way of life.”

That was what we had hundreds of years ago. Ask the Incans what happened next.

“But it seems, after reading your site, you would not allow Tribalists to exist in their own lands because you claim that they would eventually be a threat”

Ask the Incans if you don’t believe me. Or the Palestinians.

“yet you fail to see that your multiethnic/racial/religious states are states that will produce conflict anyway, and ARE A THREAT THEMSELVES.”

A threat to Jews, and to people like yourself (Gentiles). That’s the point. What kind of anti-Zionists would we be if we do not intend to be a threat to Zionism? Again, do you bother to think before writing?

“Why do you preach against those tribalists/nationalists, who wish to form an ethnostate away from your kind?”

What do you want me to do, say Israel has a ‘right’ to exist?

“Jews, with their tribalism, have survived for thousands of years while other nations collapsed BECAUSE of race-mixing and multiculturalism.”

Jews have wreaked havoc around the world for thousands of years because of their tribalism, and now we have a chance to finish them off. You want to ruin this chance.

“you are actually supremacists that will not allow others to live how they wish”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“You say are against oppression, yet you have no qualms destroying those who you disagree with.”

I am against oppression, therefore I certainly have no qualms destroying oppressors.

“You say Aryans are people who have freedom and refuse slavery, so then you are destroyers if you wish to destroy all people who want their own type of freedom; like living in their own lands secluded from others…”

Jews tell me the same thing when I criticize Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Would you wish to destroy the Amish for doing just that?”

I would destroy the Amish just for their tradition of torturing children (following the methods prescribed in the Tanakh) alone.

“Also, I am not homophobic because I’m not afraid of gays or whatever, but I don’t think their lifestyle is healthy nor would I hope my children are gay so my lineage dies off.”

In other words, you view your children as Goys for the function of continuing your lineage. That is a selfish and exploitative attitude, which I have come to expect from people like yourself.

“Every species/organism on earth wants to ensure its bloodline continues and genes are passed on”

I point you to the giant pandas that are currently being raped by machines as we speak because they themselves have no interest in continuing their bloodlines but humans are forcing them to reproduce so that humans can derive pleasure from watching them in zoos.

“No parents are hoping their children are gay.”

It’s none of the parents’ business in the first place.

“I have a handful of gay friends and we get along because they aren’t running around forcing homosexual propaganda down my throat. Those who did, actually stopped being my friend because they could not accept that I didn’t agree with their lifestyle.”

I am willing to bet that they did not attempt to argue that “heterosexuality” is wrong. You, however, are arguing that “homosexuality” is wrong. Who is forcing stuff down whose throat?

“Do you believe a Christian bakery should be forced to bake a cake for a gay couple if it violates their beliefs?”

I believe it is deceptive for such a bakery to call itself “Christian”, since Jesus was not homophobic. They should not be forced to bake a cake for anyone, but if they refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple because the couple is gay, they should be required to describe their bakery as “Judaic” in all correspondence henceforth, and to put a Star of David on their door.

“you do realize that the Jews use the LGBT community to cause drama, so we agree with that point.”

The point is that it would be mechanically impossible for Jews to use the LGBT community to cause drama if homophobia were rejected. Therefore it is people like yourself who make it possible for Jewish tactics to so easily succeed.

“none of us have a problem with Japan.”

Japan is not an ethnostate. It does not legally restrict interethnic marriage. On the contrary, anyone who has one Japanese parent is automatically Japanese, irrespective of the ethnic background of the other parent (try to persuade your WN friends to adopt this policy and see how far you get), and even people with no Japanese ancestry can, and have, become Japanese. On the other hand, people with even 100% Japanese ancestry who have lived abroad are not necessarily welcome to return to Japan (notable example being Brazilians of Japanese descent), further demonstrating that ethnicity is not the priority.

“To give you some background I have only been aware of the “jewish problem” for about 2 years now”

Then I guess you weren’t around back in 2007-2009 when the first-generation post-9/11 anti-Zionist activists had established a solid non-racist anti-Zionist movement (culminating in the OWNP), and then crypto-Jews inundated us with WNs who contaminated our work by stealing our research but inverting our message from the need to end tribalism (Jews being tribalists and therefore the enemy of the world) to the need for “white” tribalism to RIVAL Jewish tribalism. I was around back then, which is why I know first-hand that WN is absolute poison to serious anti-Zionism. You are looking at the scene after Zionist agents have already come in and gone back out, having altered its essence.

This was our song:

We might have won by now if not for WN.

“I stated I have compassion for all people and are willing to help them all, but I can’t do that if my people are destroyed now can I?”

On the contrary, it is realistically likely to come down to nuclear war if we are to destroy Israel (look up the Samson Option). Only those who are willing to risk destroying ‘their own’ people in order to simultaneously destroy Israel have any hope of destroying Israel.

“I do want to protect my people from genocide.”

Jews tell me the same thing. I don’t take them seriously either.

“I don’t’ agree with flooding Whiten nations with Islam and non-Whites etc. I don’t’ agree with affirmative action and racial quotas…Do you?”

I believe everyone should be allowed to live where they want, since none of us choose where we were born. I oppose the Mexica Movement that wants “white” Americans to be expelled from America, just as I oppose Golden Dawn that wants “non-white” Europeans to be expelled from Europe.

I am against quotas.

I am also against BobWhitakerisms such as “flooding” to describe entirely voluntary migration by individuals and “genocide” to describe entirely voluntary interethnic marriage by individuals. (I bet it was Bob Whitaker who taught you to throw Japan at me also.) You call me condescending, but I assure you there is nothing more condescending than using BobWhitakerisms in a serious discussion.

“And yes, the West colonized and do bad things, sure…But I was not there for that nor would I condone such things today.”

Which is why, if you are a “white” American, I would fight for you to be allowed to continue living in America if you wish to do so. I only despise you because you would not in return fight for “non-white” Europeans to continue living in Europe if they wish to do so.

“I do not agree with genocide; especially “white genocide” which is of my own people…”

I do not agree with using BobWhitakerisms in a serious discussion.

“Blacks are responsible for 92% of the interracial crime on whites. They rape white women at the rate of 30k per year with under 10 white men raping black women per year….the knock out game etc…”

Arrest and execute the criminals. What else do you expect me to say? Let innocent people take the blame? By the way, I don’t take FBI information at face value, since according to the FBI, al-Qaeda did 9/11.

“Are you telling me you will feel less safe in a White or Asian town than a Black town?”

Nobody is safe in a world with weapons that allow combat with no risk to the attacker, such as nukes, chemical/biological weapons, drones, sniper satellites and other remote-controlled devices, or even conventional explosives delivered by bomber aircraft or ballistic missiles (don’t get me started about chemtrails). Nobody is safe in a world filled with radioactive waste and smog and fluoridated water and toxic soil/building materials and oil spills that can’t be cleaned up and nuclear meltdowns that can’t be cleaned up. Nobody is safe in a world where people are shot up with vaccines since childhood. In fact, nobody is safe in a world where food is not grown locally. I suppose you want to tell me that all this is the fault of “blacks”.

Feeling safe has little to do with being safe. The Incans were probably feeling safe until your favourite ethnicity arrived and massacred them.

“Lets not forget the Irish slaves.”

I get along with many Irish nationalists because they refuse to self-identify as “white”, but instead stand in solidarity with fellow victims of the British Empire. I also like their welcoming attitude towards immigrants to Ireland, which they base on the reasoning that they should treat immigrants to Ireland as they would wish other countries treat Irish immigrants. This is the kind of attitude we desperately need more of these days. This is real nationalism.

“Blacks and Mexicans commit MOST of the crime in the US and they are a minority.”

According to feminists, men commit most of the crime, therefore let’s blame men as a whole! This is what you sound like to me. And I still don’t take FBI information at face value.

“But how many White towns do you know that are full of crime to the point people aren’t safe to walk the streets?”

Castile was so dangerous that even people on the other side of the ocean were not safe to walk the streets. Ask the Incans about it.

“So why is it wrong for someone who wants to live in an all-White town/state/country where they know crime would be less; the streets safer/ the women safer/ the children safer???”

Jews ask me the same thing with reference to Israel. I don’t take them seriously either.

“Children of multiracial parents look nothing like them”

If JJ weren’t so busy he’d eat you alive on this point.

“The fact you promote Hitler all over this site you should realize he was against race-mixing and would only encourage to breed the best with the best”

That’s what we encourage. For example, I would not allow you to reproduce with any of our team members.

“had the Spanish not been among the Inca, they would have not been able to destroy them…which is my point.”

But in reality they did go there, which is my point. If ethnoseparatism worked, the monoethnic Spanish would have stayed in Spain. They didn’t. So you are wrong.

(By the way, the Incans themselves were not monoethnic, they were a multiethnic society including more than 200 formerly separate groups. So we have one multiethnic society (Andalus) and another multiethnic society (Inca Empire) living in peace on two sides of the ocean. Suddenly, one society becomes monoethnic (Spain) and then the next thing you know the other is wiped out despite the ocean separating them. Yet, according to you, multiethnic society is the problem?)

“If Israel minded her own business, I wouldn’t care if she wanted to exist; not being a parasite or destroying other nations. In fact, if every Jew went to Israel and cut themselves off from the rest of the planet, the Jewish question would be solved.”

That’s what they want you to think. The next thing you know, Jews will have built such a large technological edge over everyone else that they can conquer the world by pressing a button. That’s what they are working on in Israel right now. Every day we let Israel continue to exist, they move closer to this endgame.

“You do believe in sovereignty I hope.”

I believe in sovereignty in the original autocratic sense ie. the monarch is sovereign. I am nostalgic for the ancient world when simply knowing that an immigrant population has been welcomed as new citizens by the monarch is the only reason the rest of the citizenry needed to welcome them also. Whereas these days it’s all “We want a referendum!” and other democratic garbage.


Interesting trivia:

“Cow’s flesh, however, none of these [Libyan] tribes ever taste, but abstain from it for the same reason as the Egyptians, neither do they any of them breed swine. Even at Cyrene, the women think it wrong to eat the flesh of the cow, honoring in this Isis, the Egyptian goddess, whom they worship both with fasts and festivals. The Barcaean women abstain, not from cow’s flesh only, but also from the flesh of swine.”

Humour from AW:

I like that we’ve managed to mention both types of Isis in this conversation.

Christianity from Hashtali:

the word “enemy” is a mistranslation of the original Greek “echthros” (plural: “echthroi”). “Ecthros” is actually somebody who hates you … Thus Jesus was saying love those who hate you, try to mend discord, try to help them. But he was not saying love those whom you hate

JJ vs another “Red Pill” junkie:

“Funny thing is you’re marching in lockstep with George Soros, Peter Sutherland and company who fully back the mass transposition of refugees and migrants to Europe.”

Zionists like Soros, etc. have caused conflict in the Middle East and support having the refugees come to Europe because they know that reactionaries like yourself will promote identitarianism to FURTHER DIVIDE non-Jews.

We on the other hand realize what the Zionists are trying to do and are attempting to PREVENT non-Jews from being further divided along ethnic lines. That’s what UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY means. Anyone who can’t see that inter-ethnic conflict between non-Jews only benefits Jews is not qualified to call themselves an anti-Zionist. (And anyone who immediately reacts to a crisis by turning to selfish identitarianism instead of selflessly extending a helping hand to fellow victims of Zionist violence is not qualified to say they have empathy either…)

You claim Jews are trying to elicit ‘extreme’ empathy in Europeans. Instead there has been a massive surge in the far right and widespread acceptance of racist attitudes. Do you really think Jews are dumb enough to “accidentally” mess up on such a grand scale? You are falling for their reverse-bluff.

“Western culture is not some monolithic thing. There are many variants to “Western” culture, all of which should be preserved in its unique forms.”

Should we preserve Jewish culture and the Jewish race simply because they exist (not to mention _their_ contributions to “Western” culture and all it’s derivatives)??? If not, why should Western cultures be preserved simply for existing?

We are idealists, we wish to remove ignoble elements from all cultures–fundamentally changing them. We do not wish to “preserve” anything.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 73 Comments

Rutuli 2017

a group of far-right activists have chartered a boat in the Mediterranean to disrupt rescue missions.

Identitarian activists for the ‘Defend Europe’ campaign raised €65,000 to support efforts to impede humanitarian missions.

Defend Europe intends to follow search-and-rescue vessels, document their activities and ‘confront’ them by blockading them on the seas. The aim is to force the NGO ships to alter their routes, drain their financial and organisational resources, as well inspire others to support the mission.

Thousands of innocent people could drown every day if their missions are successful.

Are the NGO vessels ready to destroy the identitarian vessel as soon as they encounter it? If not, then the identitarians win. It is that simple. You cannot help the innocent without killing the bad guys. You cannot be a “rescue vessel” without also being a combat vessel, because how do you reach in time the people who need to be rescued without being ready to eliminate without delay those who are trying to obstruct you? Pacifism does not work, has never worked and will never work.

But does the False Left get this?

Nick Lowles, chief executive of HOPE not hate, said: “While the Identitarian movement has always used controversial and confrontational tactics the hiring of this ship is emblematic of a dangerous new confidence within the movement.

“The project also reveals an increasingly international threat, with key activists coming from across Europe while support, including financial, has flooded in from around the world.

“We will be monitoring the ship’s movements very closely and liaising with NGOs and supporters over the coming months to ensure the relevant authorities are aware of the situation. We will forge a coalition of progressive organisations to oppose this dangerous new development on our high seas.”

“Monitoring” does not kill identitarians. “Liasing” does not kill identitarians. “Ensuring awareness” does not kill identitarians. “Forging a coalition” does not kill identitarians. TORPEDOES would work. ROCKET-PROPELLED GRENADES might also work. SHOOTING THE IDENTITARIANS before they even board their ship could be another option. Unless you are talking openly about measures like these, you too are accountable for the thousands of innocent people drowning every day.

Identitarians also existed in myth:

Thought to have been descended from the Umbri and the Pelasgians

In Virgil’s Aeneid, and also according to Livy,[4] the Rutuli are led by Turnus, a young prince to whom Latinus, king of the Latins, had promised the hand of his daughter Lavinia in marriage. When the Trojans arrived in Italy, Latinus [Note: great-grandson of Saturn, by no coincidence] decided to give his daughter to Aeneas because of instructions he had received from the gods to marry his daughter to a foreigner. Turnus was outraged and led his people as well as several other Italian tribes against the Trojans in war.

This is how we dealt with them:

Turnus begs Aeneas either to spare him or give his body back to his people. Aeneas considers but upon seeing the belt of Pallas on Turnus, he is consumed by rage and finishes him off. The last line of the poem describes Turnus’ unhappy passage into the Underworld.

Aeneas > Nick Lowles

Hate > Hope

“He who cannot hate the Devil cannot love God.” – Joseph Goebbels

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 26 Comments