The other thing I want to try to do is to establish a delegation system whereby we see each other’s specialist fields and then, if we think of a topic which we think is worth writing about, instead of writing it ourselves, we request the specialist of that field to write it instead. This will improve efficiency, since everyone will find it easiest to write about the topics that they have more experience with. This is essentially the part of the plan outlined on the main site:

Through developing familiarity with each other’s work, Aryanists are expected to establish specialist expertize in different areas of the subject matter and be able to mutually defer ongoing discourse with trust and respect.

http://aryanism.net/philosophy/

So this post will be all about what I would like each of you guys to write about sometime in the near future. Again, in no way is this just about me delegating to you; if you want to delegate stuff to me or to each other, that’s fine too.

To Miecz, who is nicely establishing himself as our entertainment media specialist, I wish to delegate a review of the movie “300″ and how it is ZC propaganda designed to promote racism and war with Iran.

To delendaestziobot, who has demonstrated ability in deconstructing enemy tactics, I wish to delegate an analysis of Kevin MacDonald as the main academic figure among BS Gentiles.

I have nothing specific for Elysium and OC on this occasion, in part because I think the three of us here on this blog have not yet agreed on what our own specialist fields are. What I hope will happen is either we each pick a field, or else we devote ourselves to taking up the slack wherever it appears. Ideas welcome.

By the way, we are still open for more Aryanist bloggers to help out in the propaganda war. If you believe in Unity Through Nobility and consider yourself able to fill in a topical gap that none of us are covering, or have useful technical skills to bring to the table, then please join in!

So now that the new blogs are off to an enthusiastic start, I must once again remind our allied bloggers of the importance of streamlined vocabulary. This is what distinguishes our propaganda from those of other groups: the rigour of our words. Any time I notice faults in this area, I will point them out. I also welcome criticism from you towards my use of words. Never have I claimed that my own use of words is perfect; what I am saying is that this is what all of us need to work on.

I am reading this post:

http://delendaestziobot.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/gentiles-fall-for-oliver-stones-cunning-ploy/

Naive Gentiles whom Jews Call “Goyim”

As I explained in my previous post, “Gentile” and “Goy” are distinct concepts. In fact, Gentiles have their own Goys. Also, naivety has nothing to do with whether or someone is a Goy. A Goy is anyone whose oppression is deemed acceptable amongst the oppressors. That is all the term means. It describes status, not characteristics.

Aryan Nobleman

This is repetition. “Aryan” means “noble”, therefore does not need another “noble” following it. The construction “Aryan Nobleman” might mislead readers to assume that “Aryan” means something other than “noble” (which is why only BS Gentiles call themselves “Aryan Noblemen”.) If you wish to exalt Hitler’s superiority, I suggest the term “Arhat” (Foe Destroyer) as given in the Glossary expressly for this purpose.

Also, a more general point is the need to distinguish between “Aryan” and “Aryanist”. Not all Aryans are Aryanists; there are plenty of people who live their own lives nobly, but who do not discuss politics – these are Aryans but not Aryanists. Using “Aryanist” when appropriate allows an extra level of precision. 

Moving on:

http://delendaestziobot.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/we-aryans-are-a-folk/

one nation need not suffer for the sake of another, one folk need not hinder the development of another folk!

While I fully support the sentiment against oppression, I refer to this page on the main site:

http://aryanism.net/philosophy/arya/tribalism-vs-universalism/

A key lie concering tribalism told by all nationalists, who are just tribalists seeking respectability (note that National Socialists are not nationalists, but folkists), is: “We can be for our own people without being against other people.” In a world of finite resources, it should be obvious why this is absolutely impossible.

We must be careful not to inadvertently repeat the nationalist lie. The only thing that will prevent one group from oppressing another in a world of finite resources is if every group agrees to decrease its own population so as to reduce their demand for resources faster than the rate at which resources are running out. Any group that claims to have no intent of oppressing others, yet does not: 1) reduce its population by controlling reproduction, and 2) demand that all other groups do the same, is LYING.

In other words, mere absence of a plan to oppress others in the process of collective self-preservation is not folkism. Folkism is the awareness that as long as collective self-preservation is valued as an end in itself, and not as the means to a moral purpose, we WILL END UP oppressing others sooner or later, whether we planned it or not. This is because life itself is war, and the only way to avoid war between groups is to divert the war against the evil within all groups. Unity Through Nobility necessarily means Unity Against Ignobility. (Starting with Jews and Gentiles.)

Let me clarify the use of the term “Gentile”. Firstly, it is not an alternative for the popular term “Sheeple”. Sheeple are the people who take no consequential action at all (and hence can be strategically disregarded, which is why I rarely even mention them). Gentiles are the people who take counterproductive action.

The term “Gentile” derives from the Latin “gentilis”, which means “belonging to a nation”. Gentile motives, interests and stakes are necessarily tribal, albeit without the extent of duplicity of Jews. Gentiles overlap with the group that David Myatt used to call ‘Homo Hubris’, characterized by what he called “arrogant aggression”, which I refer to as the hunter archetype.

“They [Homo Hubris] … have never been able to control, for very long, their primal instincts, their lack of respect for the numinous, and their innate bullying savagery, although they have managed, or rather connived, to convince themselves, and sometimes others, that they, and their ways, are somehow “civilized”.” – David Myatt

Many people use the terms “Gentile” and “Goy” interchangeably. This is sloppy, and I discourage it. “Goy” is a reminder of how Jews view us, namely as people outside of their circle of tribal altruism. It refers to the group’s  status of selected victimization, not to the characteristics of the group. Nor is it limited to use only when Jews are the oppressor. As I often say, in the eyes of humanists, non-humans are Goys. The Aryanist ideal is a world without Goys ie. without oppression.

“Gentile” is the term that describes the characteristics of the group. Gentiles are prone to manipulation (as opposed to the Sheeple, who are prone to passivity). We call this a slave personality. For example, anyone who prefers slavery to death is a Gentile, because whenever Jews want them as a group to do something, they can simply convince such people that they are in existential danger as a group if they do not do as required, and they will – every single time – do as required. The process is no different than how the Jewish medical industry sells us ‘healthcare products’ by scaring us with advertizements showing people with health problems. (The Sheeple continue eating Jewish-produced junk food. The Gentiles start buying Jewish-produced nutrition supplements.)

Gentiles, even those who complacently describe themselves as “Jew-wise”, are not on our side. They are the people who complain that there is a bomb inside the room, and then do everything they can to detonate it(!). Even if they (correctly) identify Jews for building the bomb, they themselves are the ones who will ultimately cause the explosion, indeed the ones on whom Jews are relying to cause the explosion – and take the fall for it when history is subsequently written. Gentiles are no less than the EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL ITSELF, the fabric whose existence enabled a bomb to be built in the first place. We call them Gentiles to distinguish them from Aryans who – while just as much Goys in the eyes of Jews – do not share this overriding reflex of self-preservation and thus will reject such Zionist manipulation. (Jews have a special name reserved for Aryans in their own language, which I will come to in another post.)

Many of the “Jew-wise” Gentiles with whom I have debated have advised me to educate myself on the Jewish goal by reading The Camp of the Saints. They never question why the originally French novel was translated into English – and hence made accessible to a much larger readership – by Norman Shapiro (Jew). In a nutshell: “Jew-wise” Gentiles promote to me a book that Jews promoted to them, telling me that the book reveals the Jewish goal. You cannot make this stuff up.

The Lord of the Rings is a far better story than The Camp of the Saints. In the past I have referred to Boromir as a Gentile specimen. Boromir considers himself rather heroic for his commitment to ‘his people’, which is why he kept trying to steal the Ring. This is the problem with Gentiles: it is extraordinarily difficult to convince them that they are part of the problem, even though it is blindingly obvious to everyone else watching. Would we trust Boromir to tell us how the Ring works? If not, then why should we trust Gentiles to tell us what Jews are doing? (Fun exercise for fence-sitters: every time you read a racist blog, imagine Boromir was the author. Then attempt to take the writings seriously.)

Aragorn to Boromir: “I will not lead the Ring within a hundred leagues of your city!”

In light of this, I have a new propaganda term to recommend: the Boromir Syndrome (BS). This is what we should use as often as possible to describe the mental condition of “Jew-wise” Gentiles every time they open their mouths. We can also apply this idea to graphics and video edits. In the same way as we’ve been superposing the Israeli flag on Alex Jones videos, we could start superposing Boromir’s face on David Duke videos!

There are ZC Gentiles (racist/Islamophobic, pro-Jewish). Then there are BS Gentiles (self-proclaimed “Jew-wise” and anti-Jewish, but remain racist/Islamophobic). In some ways, the latter are worse.

“… anti-Semitic only in outward appearance. And this was worse than if it had made no pretences at all to anti-Semitism; for the pretence gave rise to a false sense of security among people who believed that the enemy had been taken by the ears; but, as a matter of fact, the people themselves were being led by the nose. The Jew readily adjusted himself to this form of anti-Semitism and found its continuance more profitable to him than its abolition would be.” – Adolf Hitler

First of all, a belated welcome to Miecz Elizejski for starting an affiliated blog, which you can visit here:

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com

I also thank our regular positive commenters – Delendaestziobot, Julian, Colin, Longinus, and any others I might have missed - for your input here, but on top of this I would like to encourage you to start blogs of your own if you have not already done so. It is free, easy to set up, and will help to increase our online presence. If you post an article on your own blog which we find useful, we will mirror it here. Even more importantly, a blog of your own will also allow you to rebut our propaganda enemies without worrying about your comments getting deleted from their sites (which happens VERY often if you are a non-racist opponent of Jewish domination).

Try to find a special topic of your own that no one else is covering, so as to minimize content overlap. And try to use a common vocabulary, as on our Glossary page. And of course, use our slogan: Unity Through Nobility. For further details, please refer to this page:

http://aryanism.net/politics/upgrading-anti-zionism/

If you do start a blog, please post the link in a comment below this post so we know where you are. At a little over a year since the breakup of the OWNP, I look forward to being part of this newly rising Aryanist intellectual community.

“Is it blood? Blood is a common possession, but that has not prevented men who spoke one language to have been at loggerheads with each other for centuries. Is it our common economic interests? But that has not prevented the hardest struggles from taking place precisely in this sphere. Is it our history? We know it only too well: a sad tale of war and dissension. Is it religion which is common to us all? No, here too we have fought and disputed with each other … In the same way it is not common customs nor common usages. No, it is something quite different which not merely brings us to this community but even makes it inevitable. It is our common fate, that common fate which none can escape and which is the lot of all life upon this earth.” – Adolf Hitler 

The essayist Emerson once famously said consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.  If this is so, then our judaic enemies must have very little minds indeed.  Our ZC Juden foe is nothing if not boorishly predictable in his monomaniacal National Marxist neo-conservative/neo-liberal sophist historicist solipcism.  Whether in the arts and sciences, politics or history, the underlying pattern of their Yahwist Death Wish is much the same.  

A key technique used by the Juden to divide and destroy non-Juden is to take an important Aryan truth, leave about nine-tenths of it intact and slyly proceed to change a critical tenth of the truth in question and thereby completely transform that given truth into a similitude of its former self designed to target and annihilate its true Aryan original.  Thus most of the confusion that presently reigns among the human race at this end of Kali Yuga.

The prevailing Marxist pseudo-science begins by granting honor to the fathers of lies. In biology there is the false biology of Darwin that mimicks the true biology of Mendel.  In psychology there is the false psychology of Freud that mimicks the true psychology of Jung.  In political philosophy Rousseau’s pseudo-democratic sovereignty of the general will mimicks the true political philosophy of the Fuhrer-prinzip and (federal) Aryan kingship.  In economics the false materialist economics of Adam Smith mimicks the true economics of corporatism (as seen in John Ruskin, Pope Leo XIII, Leon Bloy, Georges Sorel, Ezra Pound, William Cookson, Eustace Mullins and N.S. economics).  In education the false theory of John Dewey has for generations mimicked the true educational philosophy of Aryan classical education (such as in the writings of Abbot Hugh of Cluny and Abbé Jean-Joseph Gaume).  In philosophy Marxism mimicks the true Aryan philosophy of Heidegger’s Ariosophia and in religion the radical subjectivism or solipsism of Judeo-Christianity mimicks the  true objectivity of Aryan multiform monotheism, whether Catholic, Protestant or the Paganism of Wotan/Apollo/Mars, all of which harmonize in the divine manhood of Lucifer Kristos.  In the arts the Aryan romance of classicism is mimicked and attacked by judaic mass commercialism, in ethics triune monotheist morality is at war with its similitude of Talmudic unitary self-righteous self-satisfaction and in rhetoric the Aryan logic of a Kurt Gödel is at war with the sophism of mass media.

And Judah introduces a third element to wage a kind of “good cop Gentiles/bad cop Juden” Talmudic strategy of divide and exterminate that serves to crowd out Aryan objectivity.  Instead of Nobility we are advertised into a bogus necessity to accept shreds and tatters of Nobility as a lesser of evils.  If Adam Smith is too brutal, then our “kindly friend” Karl Marx will help us achieve what (allegedly!) is the only possible economic justice, with what is  (allegedly) a more “sustainable” economic justice.  If Darwin is too stark, then the “kinder, gentler” biology of Lamarck is adopted as a more sentimental way to reject the true Aryan biology of Mendel, Louis Agassiz, Baron de Cuvier and Linnaeus.  Always a less painful Gentile alternative is made available as a seemingly pleasant anodyne for cowardly suicide.

In religion as an allegedly lesser evil we are offered the sugar-coated Gentile version of religious modernism known as fundamentalism and in politics there is the Gentile Marxism of White Nationalism.  The former offers us shreds and tatters of the ancient Christian/Pagan Aryan Creeds and the latter shreds and tatters of the constructive European and American Christian/Pagan Nationalism of our ancestors.  If we will but accept some seemingly small morsel of judaic falsehood, then we will (allegedly) be allowed to survive and be left in peace by our new-found judaic allies.  Yet more judaic lies!

This is nothing other than the ancient siren song of cowardice that is as old as the hills and at least twice as dusty.  It is another instance of being sold that famous bridge in Brooklyn and every Aryan should have no doubt that the Juden have no more regard for traitors than Gentiles or Aryans would.  Probably less regard, in fact.

The hard reality of manhood is, has been and ever shall be instead the fact of masculine solitude.  Noble men are, as we Catholic Aryans have often put it, forever alone with the Alone, and, if we are fortunate, with our one counterpart in life.  Our essential joy must come from within and we must learn that we shall never find our own happiness in others.  Nobility means being helpful to others more than being helped by others; the others are there more to be helped by us than to be helpful to us.  Such is Aryan Loyalty!

It is only within this bracing context that we can see the Aryan truth of politics and history.  The White Nationalists, in harsh fact, are the Republicans, the Tories, the Gaullists, the Christian Democrats and the existing political Right generally.  They are the very Gentile traitors and apostates who have betrayed us to Yisrael and Yahweh in the first place, no doubt for an appropriate amount of money.  And they are the smiling face of Jewry always ready with a “helping hand” to stab us in the back.

If we seriously desire Indo-European Aryan victory and success we must beware of small compromises that would enable us to come to terms with the tyrannical status quo of our ZC New World Disorder.  “Think not that I am come to bring peace to the earth; I have come not to bring peace but the sword!”  (Matthew 10:34)

In particular, White Nationalist organizations such as the BNP,  the Reform Party of Canada, the Tea Party, Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, the so-called mainstream media in general and their ZC echoes on “the White Right” are merely scams by which our judaic establishment seduces and integrates post-Aryans into their Yahwist orgy of death.  If an Aryan were bent on suicide then old-fashioned cyanide would work better at much less cost and trouble to everyone.

We Aryans should suffer no illusions about the wildly popular Viennese Juden economist Ludwig von Mises.  He is not our friend, but rather he was Usurer-in-Chief of the late Austro-Hungarian Empire.  He was, more than anyone, to blame for the corruption and fall of our late great Imperial Family, the House of Habsburg.  His judaic traitor disciples have played the same role in recent decades in bringing down the entire Western World.  What we owe them is not gratitude.  Oh, shades of Auschwitz!

We should also beware of ways by which to render the Juden into harmless risible gypsies.  In our Aryan education there is perhaps no subject so important to our future prospects as Aryan history.  In our study of history the great danger at present is to allow a double-standard, one for Gentiles and the other for Jews.  Gentiles are permitted to entertain a false tepid history in which no reality threatens their comfortable moderate sustainability.  Except that a comfortable life without reality is in reality another name for cowardly suicide and very soon anything but comfortable.

Instead we should accept our objective history, the well-known History of Western Civilization, in which the Juden were once upon a time long long ago themselves Indo-European Aryans. Their degenerate transformation from ancient Mittanian Syrian Hebrews into contemporary Juden is history’s most ghastly betrayal and anything but a harmless story of amusing gypsies.

Hence the danger of denying the existence of Aryan Biblical characters, of the Crusades and of an extinguished Aryan potential in the Juden that is objective Aryan history’s greatest might-have-been, along with what Europe and the American Republic might have been if the Juden had not destroyed them in recent times.  In our Aryanist history tragedy must not be denied.  (And, mein Gott, what tragedy!!)

We can never glimpse the true dimensions of judaic evil unless we have the severe courage to see the Aryan greatness and nobility of what the Jews have shamelessly betrayed and murdered.  Yisrael and Jerusalem are not the Heart of Evil because they are unimportant or best forgotten.  But that is, of course, the exact agenda of so-called White Nationalism:  If we would but erase from our history and memory that the Juden are, have always been and will forever remain THE singular incomparable enemy of all humankind, animalkind and sentient beings whomsoever.

Lest we forget, a man can only sell his soul to Yahweh one time.  After that it is too late because cowardice is habit-forming.  Once a noble man cowers before the Juden there is no turning back.  The bogus White Nationalist Right has made its deal with Yisrael, Jew York and the City of London.  They have sold out to Yahweh and will reap the whirlwind for their reward.

May Lucifer Kristos have mercy upon them.  No one else will.

The ideal Aryanist state leadership structure – at least in its infancy – is relatively rare in history. As we have only written a limited amount on leadership and government, I think it is important to develop this further. I will compare Augustan Rome and Hitlerian Germany for the commonalities which highlight the characteristics of Aryanist political leadership. The comparisons are not perfect, especially since the quantity and quality of records from the latter period surpass that of the former considerably. Nevertheless, the comparison should assist in comparing the basic outlines of Aryanist with non-Aryanist leadership.

Aryanist governance requires a visionary leader who guides the state and thus the destiny of that realm over which he has power. The use of ‘guide’ is important, as it reveals the difference between a leader and merely an administrator. Quite obviously there is great difference between ‘Fuehrer’ and ‘President’, with the latter tending much more towards the managerial notion of libertarian governance. Thus, it isn’t the role of the Aryanist leader to personally formulate policy or to bother himself with its implementation and micromanaging. Obviously this has historical significance; in terms of the misperceptions of Hitler as either the ‘sort-of-dictator’ of the Structuralists, or as the omniscient devil of popular culture (to whom anything involving Germany between 1933-45 can be directly attributed).

Rather, Aryanist leadership derives from authority. Giorgio Agamben has gone into considerable depth on the link between the Roman auctoritas and the National Socialist Fuehrertum, as well as Weber’s “Charismatic authority”. Essentially, for those unaware of the Roman political and cultural text, auctoritas is ‘authority’ and potestas is actual ‘power’. An important example from Weber would be the comparison with the auctoritas of a figure like Christ or Gandhi, compared with the potestas of, for example, a legislator.

After firmly establishing himself as the dominant force in Rome through successive consulships, Caesar Augustus abandoned this post and became the princeps (first citizen). Essentially, his leadership was enabled only by his ability to “make people do what he wanted, just by being who he was”. While still maintaining executive powers (imperium), Augustus’ power derived fundamentally from his authority as the central leader of Rome.

Something similar is true with Hitler, who was called ‘leader’, as opposed to the embodiments of potestas – President and Chancellor. This allowed Hitler to set Germany along a National Socialist path, while at the same time playing almost no rule in administration. He primarily relied upon the willingness of the bureaucracy and people to “work towards the Fuehrer” – interpreting his desires and innovating and administering the practicalities of its implementation.

The benefits of this form of leadership are perhaps less evident to those accustomed to modern, Western politics, than the drawbacks. With the latter comes the obvious problem of interpretation; with considerable power falling to a chaotic network of competing individuals who may misinterpret the words of the leader, thus resulting in unintended policies. Similarly, the lack of explicit instruction can prevent the desired policies from being implemented. This is why both leaders also possessed executive power (essentially absolute power) to intervene where required.

However, the benefits are immense for an Aryanist state. The leader is able to avoid micromanaging the territories under his control, and instead devote himself to the role of a leader – that is, forming, developing and communicating a vision for the rest to follow. Additionally, it allows for the development of a real leadership in possession of the initiative which the modern state lacks. I fear that a proper appreciation of the significance of this alone is incredibly difficult for those of us who have never witnessed in our lifetimes the potential of personal leadership, as opposed to the continuity of unchanging democratic governments.

Nevertheless, the reason I started with the qualification “at least in its infancy” is because I believe that this form of government is the most applicable for our age. In the west, it should be able to bind the mainstream parties into a coalition under the authority of an Aryan leader. The delegation of tasks from the leader downwards will also lead to what we now call “grassroots activism” which will most rapidly and properly communicate Aryanism from the top downwards, quickly becoming culturally and socially engrained.

I sought with this post only to develop further on an Aryanist state leadership. This is by no means extensive, conclusive nor authoritative. I suspect that this topic will require further elaboration in the future.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZGK33rkk6E

Don’t forget to check out some of 91177info’s other videos:

http://www.youtube.com/user/91177info

Everyone is talking about the recent behaviour of the French police towards people sleeping on the street since being evicted from their council housing. In other words, Nicolas Sarkozy (Jew) apparently thinks it is time to test the ZC conditioning of the French public. The online response seems mixed so far. Many condemn the police brutality, but many others express pleasure in watching the video.

Among other points I have noticed from reading comments is how many people automatically (and incorrectly) assumed that the victims are illegal immigrants. This indicates that people are reaching the stage where they stop caring about getting the story straight. Facts are no longer as powerful a tool in the propaganda war as they were a few years ago.  Rhetoric is becoming more important. I recommend that everyone on our side develop our rhetorical arsenal at least as much as our factual arsenal. This begins with use of streamlined vocabulary, which is what I have been suggesting all along. 

But the real issue is our attitude regarding the police. There seem to be two schools of thought even among anti-Zionists. Some believe that the police are not to be trusted at all. Others believe that our propaganda should target the police to get them on our side.

I personally do not have much hope that the police will start arresting Zionist war criminals any time soon. Having said that, I think the best approach to this issue is to look at what our propaganda enemies are doing. We know for a fact that racist/Islamophobic groups ARE aiming their propaganda at the police (not to mention that many police departments receive their actual training from the IDF). This means that we HAVE TO do the same, not to get the police on our side, but just with the hope of keeping them neutral! Spreading information to the police does not imply trusting them to sort everything out. We are not at that stage yet. Our immediate aim is simply to prevent chaos. This is especially important in countries where civilians are not armed.

I personally have communicated with only one police officer, who was completely pro-Israel, pro-Jewish, implicitly racist and just plain unreceptive to anything I had to say. Hope you guys have better luck.

“To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. THERE IS NOTHING MORE DANGEROUS THAN PERSONAL INITIATIVE: if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord.” – Protocols of Zion

OK, let’s clear this up, hopefully for the last time. I actually wrote about the issue fairly recently:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/drawing-the-lines-of-opposition/

but let this post be the definitive one.

1) “Zionist” is not a code-word for “Jew”. Anyone who has been around this site knows that we do not shy away from saying “Jew” when appropriate. But just because we use “Jew” in our discussion doesn’t mean “Zionist” is obsolete. When we say “Jew”, we mean Jew. When we say “Zionist”, we mean Zionist.

2) There is no such thing as an ‘anti-Zionist Jew’, because Zionism is a fundamental consequence of Jewish identity, therefore to claim opposition to Zionism while retaining Jewish identity is hypocrisy. (A person of Jewish ancestry who is on our side should declare apostasy from Judaism and voluntarily not reproduce.) (“The good Jew does not exist, for one such as that would cease to be a Jew.” – John Alan Martinson Jr.)

3) There are, however, non-Jewish Zionists. Therefore, the word “Zionist” does not exclude any Jews, but includes their non-Jewish helpers, commonly referred to as Shabbos Goys.

4) Zionism refers not only to events after the founding of the Zionist Movement in 1897 by Theodor Herzl (Jew). The term “Zion” appears in the Tanakh, therefore Zionism has actually existed for as long as the idea of Zion – a ‘promised land’ from which Jews will subjugate all other peoples – has existed and motivated Jewish behaviour. (“Then the moon shall be confounded, and the sun ashamed, when the Lord of hosts shall reign in mount Zion.” – Tanakh (Some believe the moon refers to Islam and the sun to National Socialism.))

Zion is not to be understood as a “Jewish homeland”, but as a strategic headquarters for the international Jewish diaspora.

“When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish state in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign state, this cannot be controlled by other states. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a school for the training of other swindlers.” – Adolf Hitler

Now really pay attention:

5) “Zionism” ultimately refers to the broad plan outlined in the Protocols of Zion and its possible unfoldings in reality, which is what anti-Zionists are specifically dedicated to countering. However, there are many people aware of Jewish machination who yet believe that Jews have an agenda other than Zionism. In particular, Gentiles (depending on their ethnicity) believe that the agenda is “black genocide” or “white genocide” or similar paranoid drivel in which Jews have forged a mysterious alliance with all other groups against their own. These people may be anti-Jewish, but they are not anti-Zionists. In fact they are Zionist useful idiots, because Zionism is precisely about fooling non-Jews into fighting each other by whatever means possible.

Jews know that they cannot stop more and more people from seeing their bad behaviour. Their last line of propaganda defense is to mislead us into seeing the WRONG AGENDA behind their bad behaviour. This is why they themselves promote Jew-blaming racist groups: the ones who, if we mistake them for our allies just on account of their anti-Jewish (but not anti-Zionist) rhetoric, would lead us all into the abyss.

So here is how it is: we use “Jew” to rally agreement on who the enemy is; we use “Zionist” to rally agreement on what the enemy is trying to do to us. Allies can only be found based on agreement on BOTH these points.

And finally we use “Aryan” to rally agreement on what we stand for: Unity Through Nobility.

“That is the mightiest thing which our Movement must create: for these widespread, seeking and straying masses a new Faith which will not fail them in this hour of confusion, to which they can pledge themselves, on which they can build so that they may at least find once again a place which may bring calm to their hearts.” – Adolf Hitler

(To the music of E Nomine)

A Terrible Beauty is Born:

I burn without end…  Demons spare me.  Racing I fear the eye,

I freeze, my heart turns to stone.  My life is broken,

Thrown away and lost,

You shine darker than night.  You are older than light.

You are invisible…  You have no face…

And you have been hiding gauntly since the beginning of time,

Black Sun…

You penetrate and numb the mind, you illuminate my mind,

You Tempt and you steal,

You are cold and your glow died long ago,

And you have warmed me mentally since the beginning of time,

Black Sun…

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood wildly,

In  the course of bright shining hell.

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood,

Is Cerberus!

You appear in my dream, you caress my black heart,

You contribute to the light of the life tree, you free me from pain,

And you have actually been frightening me for all of time,

Black Sun…

You fly faster than light,

You are over everything at the same time,

Background.  The Carnivore.  The Cerberus.

They burn with hunger for flesh,

You are not mother or father and not the Kingdom of Heaven,

You are kept here in the underworld,

But without you I am nothing for all of time,

Black Sun…

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood wildly,

In the course of bright shining hell.

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood,

Is Cerberus!

I burn without end…

Demons spare me.

Racing I fear the eye,

The Carnivore,

The Cerberus.

Are kept here in the underworld,

They burn with hunger for flesh,

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood wildly,

In the course of bright shining hell.

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood,

Is Cerberus!

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood wildly,

In the course of bright shining hell.

Ever desirous to follow the smell of blood,

Is Cerberus!

Die Schwarze Sonne!

Regarding the condition of Israel and Jewish power in America, I see a need to distinguish between positivity and optimism. Yes, we must be positive, in that we must believe that we can make a difference through activism to win the argument over our enemies. This is not the same, however, as the kind of optimism that leads people to believe that we can just sit back and wait for the victory to show up by itself.

Elysium wrote:

anti-Zionists should cease grouping Obama in Israel’s camp, and instead urge that he and America cease supporting Israel.

My reading of this suggestion is quite different to OC’s. I agree that, for propaganda purposes, it might be a good idea to demand that Obama cease supporting Israel. I disagree with internally holding any expectation that Obama – who is nothing more than a Shabbos Goy for Rahm Emanuel (Jew) - would actually pay attention to such demands. Rather, the only purpose of such demands would merely be to make the continuing American support of Israel a more polarizing issue than Obama’s domestic policies. Obama is already unpopular; our aim should be to make him unpopular for the right reasons. The most we can hope for is an anti-Israel version of the Tea Party Movement being formed. This would then be a realistic population pool for promotion to full anti-Zionism, from which in turn people like John Alan Martinson and Adam Austin might finally get the required numbers and funding for their revolutionary militia.

And while the economic collapse is indeed an opportunity for the emergence of new government, let us be realistic: the Gentiles are currently ahead of us in the ideological queue. We have to overtake them first to have a chance. I absolutely believe this can be done with enough effort, because in the final analysis our ideology is far superior to any of theirs, but I do not assume the Gentiles are going to give up of their own accord. And I guarantee that Jews, if forced to choose between supporting Gentiles or supporting us, will support Gentiles. Remember: this is a three-way conflict, and should always be described as such.

I do anticipate dramatic and even apparently miraculous events in the next few years. We should at least consider the possibility that these could be engineered events designed to put us off-guard, for Jews would surely rather give us an illusory victory than wait for us to achieve genuine victory. My warning is this: if it looks too good to be true, it probably is. (Have we not been warned that the Antichrist/Dajjal will perform miracles to gain followers, and make people believe that he is their saviour?)

The future is not set. We must believe we can win. We must not assume we cannot lose.