In the following video and article is what I hope is the prelude to a genuine revolution in America

http://www.examiner.com/article/gun-control-hearing-interrupted-by-a-spontaneous-pledge-of-allegiance-video

It was a hearing about stricter gun control laws, and the people decided to express their displeasure. I wish they had done much more, but it may be building up to that. By doing this, they took a step towards reaching the American ideal – the image of a youthful land filled with space and sunlight, defiant against a corrupt Europe and offering an escape from its stale air, populated by people who were  self-sufficient, brave, dignified, sincere, free-thinking, simple and without any masters. This is what America could have been, and it is what America must become, although this aspect of America has always existed in some form alongside other strands. The Transcendentalists, for example, were on their way to forming a distinctly American Aryan culture and literary tradition.

But let us take some time to remind ourselves why guns should not be prohibited. First is the obvious argument that people should have the means to defend themselves against tyranny. And then, even without this consideration, we must realise that there will always be victims of crime. If a victim of crime is unable to defend themself, it is the legislator’s fault for not allowing them to carry a gun. If a person commits a crime with a gun, the legislator is not to blame because only the criminal is responsible for the crime. Therefore, in order for the legislator to avoid committing an immoral act, he must not prevent people from arming themselves. Thinking of it slightly differently, we must ask whether we could ever justify punishing someone who had carried a gun only to defend themselves then ended up having to use it against a criminal. If gun control laws came into effect, such injustices would happen. People would be given a choice between defending themselves from criminals (and then being punished by the government) and being victims of crime (but not being punished by the government.) An honourable legislator passes a law only if they know it can be justified in practice, but how can we justify a law to a victim of crime who was denied the means to defend themself? That person would have suffered an injustice, and a law that creates injustices when properly implemented cannot be justified. Moreover, since our ideal is a population does not accept slavery, gun control is incompatible with our ideal, since no-one in that population could accept an authority figure telling them that they should not be allowed to defend themself.

As we have mentioned before, the gun laws in an Aryan state would not be complete freedom of choice. Instead, everyone would be obliged to carry guns to defend their fellow citizens and because we know that people interested in acquiring guns are more likely to be violent (or at least that people with no interest in acquiring guns are less likely to be violent.) This requirement would ensure that weapons are not concentrated in the wrong hands.

I was about to write an upbeat post about Stephen Hawking joining the Boycott Israel movement based on early reports:

http://news.yahoo.com/even-stephen-hawkings-joining-fight-palestinian-freedom-024837547.html

but within a matter of hours it seems he has been pressured to back down and instead cite health reasons for not attending:

http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/stephen-hawking-boycotts-top-israeli-conference-083504255.html

Let’s see what happens next.

Prof. Hawking, as a fan of yours when I was in school, I sincerely hope you can be remembered in history not just as a cosmologist but as someone who stood up against Jewish tyranny. If you openly boycott Israel, you will inspire many young cosmologists to get involved who might not have otherwise done so. Cosmologists tend to be solid thinkers, and if only a fraction of them could become anti-Zionists, it would help raise the intellectual calibre of the discussion (which has suffered decline for many years ever since the old-guard conspiracy sleuths were deliberately inundated with racist idiots as part of the Zionist countermeasure to exposure).

_____

UPDATE

Hawking’s boycott decision has been positively confirmed! Yay!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/08/a-brief-history-of-stephen-hawking-s-boycott.html

This will definitely help anti-Zionism in Britain as a whole, so it’s not like we are counting on Scotland only – there is hope in England and Wales too!

By the way, for newcomers, here is the list of brands to boycott:

http://www.inminds.com/boycott-brands.html

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/05/04/301815/church-questions-israel-existence/

Of course extremely mild by our standards, but still a step in the correct direction, which could lead to greater things in future. While the rest of Europe digs itself deeper and deeper into ZC (UKIP fear-feeding, French homophobia, Golden Dawn racist thuggery), Scotland is a haven of goodwill by comparison.

Scotland must become independent. This success will give Scots the self-confidence they need to not only themselves stay uninfected by ZC/BS but to show the rest of Europe a different way.

Bonus video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99WSC5cQ-z4

Also please join me in welcoming our newest member Panzerfaust of pzkpwt54, who appeared in our links a few days ago and has now started a new blog, Force of the Sun:

http://niruyekhorshid.tumblr.com/

Latest news:

http://news.sky.com/story/1084922/edl-terror-attack-plot-six-men-plead-guilty

This is the media shifting from political correctness to Zionist correctness using the exact method that we have predicted for years ( which you can see by reading the main site and going through our archives.) Once again, here is how the plan works:

1) Force an ideology onto the public that no-one but an absolute sheep could believe (the ideology here being multiculturalism – that a society made up of people with completely different values can not only exist stably, but is a good thing.)

2) Continue to pretend to believe in this ideology while simultaneously giving information from which people can easily conclude that some incompatible ideology is true, which they will promote in the future (in this case, the media continues to praise multiculturalism while also praising Western, democratic values and running stories like this from which people can conclude that Muslims are the enemy.)

3) Because people are so angry with the absurd ideology that is being forced on them, they will follow the ideology they think the people promoting the absurd ideology do not want them to follow, when in fact this is part of the plan. (So, people are angry about the lie of multiculturalism, think the people promoting multiculturalism want them to like Muslims, and as a result decide that Muslims are the enemy, even though it is the people supporting multiculturalism that have portrayed Muslims in the worst light and guided them towards this conclusion while pretending to be opposed to it.)

4) Switch to the new ideology. In this case, they have even had the leader of the EDL giving his two cents on the BBC without asking him any challenging questions.

It does not matter whether this story is actually true (but come on – they failed because they showed up late? What is this, the Four Lions?) The point is that it is being exploited to serve their agenda, and as long as people continue to follow the bait they are succeeding. Even if most of the people reading this site would not actually miss anyone from the EDL if they were assassinated (I know I wouldn’t), do not forget that this sort of nonsense can make people feel sorry for them and turn them into the ‘good guy’, just like the so-called Holocaust made everyone forget about the crimes Jews have been committing for centuries.

New page:

http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/agrarianism/

By the way, this just came up in the incoming links:

http://pzkpwt-54.tumblr.com/post/49169542312/nikkers-dot-net-brunettejubblies

Anyone here know these guys? They should join us.

And yet again I must thank John Johnson for his consistently excellent comments.

Finally, in case anyone here hasn’t noticed, Miecz is back!

https://swordofelysium.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/the-handed-victory-vs-gnostic-struggle/

Today, someone asked me what I would do with the Jews if I were in charge. ‘How can you achieve your goals ethically?’ they asked. ‘Surely you would need to segregate them in ghettos or exterminate them or do something equally wicked? Moreover, how would you convince the general population that you are right when they have been brainwashed to close their ears at the slightest criticism of Jewry?’

Here is the (honest) answer I gave, and the answer I recommend you give if asked a similar question. I would not order there to be any kind of violence or discrimination against Jews. I would not order them to be deprived of their property or segregated. There would be no blood on my hands. Instead, I would do something very fair. I would make it compulsory for every Jew to wear a uniform indicating that they are a Jew. Not necessarily a full set of clothing, maybe something like this:

This would not be to demonise them or make them seem different (they will do that themselves.) It would only be for purposes of transparency. Suddenly, instead of seeing a senate or a parliament full of inconspicuous people in suits, people will see a government dominated by Jews. Instead of seeing opponents debating each other (whether they be politicians, writers, activists or professors), they will see two people wearing the same uniform and working for the same team. On the stock exchange, everyone will suddenly see crowds of Jews. Film and TV credits and the names of authors and journalists will also be marked with the star of David, and books, CDs, DVDs, newspapers and magazines marked with this sign will fill the stores.

I will not persecute the Jew because I do not need to. Once their disguises have been taken away the people can decide for themselves what to do.

I do not think much will come of North Korea’s recent actions in the short term, but it is refreshing to see someone stand up to the Zionist state of America. But these events are still important because they are part of a trend that is gathering momentum. Countries like North Korea, Russia and others have, in the past few years, increasingly spoken out against the West despite not being threatened directly. The lies of the West, their real motivations for war, their hypocrisy, are now so obvious that to not oppose them would be nothing other than an act of complete cowardice. We do not want war (though it would still be preferable to increasing Zionist power), and hopefully the actions of these countries will eventually be joined by internal revolutions. In following years, we can expect incidents like these to become more frequent, perhaps leading to an eventual anti-Western alliance. Countries with very different ideologies, united only by their opposition to the West, are already supplying its enemies with weapons. Syria is being supplied by North Korea, Russia, China and Iran, and is holding out particularly well. The motivations of these countries is partially financial, but it is noteworthy that they are mostly not supplying the allies of the West. The war in Syria is being dragged out much longer than the West thought it would be. If enough of these countries directly opposed Zionism and Israel, then it would be defeated.

Another article by Mandrake:

A lot has been written about David Icke, the controversial conspiracy theorist who emerged from being a former TV sports journalist, presenter and ex-soccer player.

An interesting combination of all different manner of conspiracies have been pieced together by Mr. Icke over the last 20 years. He’s written many books, given many talks and lectures all across the globe and made a substantial amount of money doing so. To many he’s of the same ilk as Alex Jones, the very well known American conspiracy theorist, and Mr. Icke has appeared on Alex Jones’ show numerous times although not always in agreement.

David Icke postulates that there is a Reptilian race that is in control of the World, our lives and everything within it. We don’t know it since we can only see, as mainstream science states, 0.005% of the actual Universe. It’s plausible that we are indeed so completely blind to the ‘real’ Universe out there, that we simply can only live in this Universe with its laws of Physics and there exists multiverses which are simply tuned to a slightly different frequency. This is pretty much a standard these days with M-theory, string theory and all the rest of the theories to try and explain ‘the equation of everything’, but when Icke said this he was pretty much ‘out there’.

Icke states that this Reptilian race are from the lower 4^th dimension and that they, through such ‘artificial’ constructs as the Moon, exercise their total control over our planet – something akin to the Matrix movie trilogy. These Reptilians are, Mr. Icke says, capable of shape shifting into human form but to sustain this form they need human blood sacrifices in the form of Satanic rituals. These shape shifters include the British Royal family, George W Bush and many, many others. They are also partial to pedophilia for some obscure reason and Icke has named many people in the British and World establishment as practicing pedophiles. Some of these claims have recently turned out to be true, from the Jimmy Savile, to Lord McAlpine and other TV and political famous faces.  The Freemasons and the ‘Illuminati’, Jesuits such as Opus Dei, are he states actively trying to secure a New World Order from where they will launch depopulation protocols and merge every sovereign state into a Global government of ‘fascist’ tyranny.

He also says that we are ultimately not this crude flesh but we are spiritual beings who have been trapped in the World of matter by the Reptilians. Much of his musings are very far fetched such as Adolf Hitler being a Jew and a Rothschild, which echo Henry Makow’s views.

Mr. Icke has done a phenomenal amount of research and regurgitated a phenomenal amount too. From the Rothschilds to the New World Order, UFOs, ghosts, CIA/Mossad assassinations, he’s concocted a Worldview that encompasses all these into a highly readable and darn right entertaining read. His more mainstream ‘conspiracies’ we Aryanists would readily agree with. Where we differ vastly is over what he calls ‘Zionists’ and we call ‘Jews’. We believe that all Jews are Zionists, whether they admit it or not.

He believes that the Zionists are singled out especially for these Reptilians to operate through, although it’s no fault of the Jew or Judaism, they just happen to be the favorite chosen people to do so, the Ashkenazi Jews are mentioned time and time again.

Earlier in David Icke’s career prior to his writing and activism, he contracted Arthritis, which led to him to being unable to play soccer anymore and he became a sports pundit for the BBC. When he joined the Green Party in the later 1980s he received an epiphany to travel to Peru where he met a Shaman who gifted him the ‘real’ World vision. When he returned he was subsequently ridiculed in the press in the UK, the most famous example being a disgusting piece of absolute humiliation on the then hit TV talk show ‘Wogan’. He was obviously going through some kind of mental breakdown but the ridicule continued and he was forced to quit the Greens and the BBC in effect disowned him.

In the early ‘90s he was in vogue with the neo-Nazi Combat 18, which had passed from Charlie Sargent (who was sent to jail) to the stewardship of David Myatt. Many neo-Nazis went to hear Icke speak on the subject of global domination by Ashkenazi Jews.

Towards the mid 90s Icke grew in popularity. His books were starting to sell and he was given applause for his unflinching belief that he was spreading the truth he’d uncovered regardless of the ridicule he initially faced. Many of his books exposed the Freemasons, Satanic covens, Pedophilia practiced by the global ‘elite’. Much of these theories turned out to be true. As Icke’s popularity grew there was a change. The Jews became ‘Zionists’ and he wrote one of his most popular books, the ‘Reptilian Agenda’ which introduced his audience to shape shifting Reptilians who needed human blood to sustain their artificial human constructed shapes. Think of  1980s Sci-Fi show ‘V’ and you’ll get the general gist.

The shift then started, no longer was the Jew the source of humanity’s woe, and it was the Reptilians. Many theorized that Icke simply substituted the word ‘Jew’ for ‘Reptilian’ but he has on many occasions refuted that speculation and said his Reptilian view was something that he knew all along but people weren’t ‘ready’ for the truth of it in his earlier works. Keen to abandon his neo-Nazi following he courted many extreme left wing elements by constantly deriding fascism and throwing the word around that he obviously knew would stoke up the ignorant masses. His work is important and does highlight the facts of Jewish usury and mass subconscious brainwashing through the mainstream media. He has also stated that he believes that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are authentic yet, these days distances himself from his previous support of their authenticity. In his earlier works he also touched on the ‘Holocaust’ but after severe Jewish led intimidation in Canada, from both the Jewish Congress and Foxman’s ADL he subsequently withdrew any commentary from the subject. He was also dropped by his then publisher for touching on the subject.

Obviously Mr. Icke took the goy biscuit, not wishing a fate similar to David Irving and Ernst Zundel, also to making a good living from something he enjoys doing.

Summing up, I’ve read Icke’s books since 1995. I remember as 9/11 happened I said to a female Muslim co-worker ‘The Jews are behind that, David Icke said there’d be a huge false flag attack’, to which she replied ‘You sound just like my Dad, he said the same, but I think Bin Laden is a madman’. Icke had initially opened my eyes to the Jew and their scheming for which I’m eternally grateful.

Read his books by all means, but keep in mind the fact that he could have been such a potent force against Zionism but chose the easier road instead of the one less travelled.

In case you haven’t heard, a date has been set for the Scottish independence referendum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6y3YwNX9BA

Morale is high, and the mainstream Yes Campaign propagandists appear to be on top form:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDrqamBHqLg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qetvDbl4Xfs

Official site:

http://www.yesscotland.net/

Meanwhile, anti-Zionists in Scotland are triangulating:

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/22/294811/boycott/

If both manouevres go completely according to plan, and if anti-Zionists play their cards correctly, a newly independent Scotland could potentially become the first anti-Zionist state in Europe, which will then open the path for more to follow. So let’s all help make it happen! What we need to do is maximize the overlap between the support bases of these two movements. Secessionists need to be educated in anti-Zionist ideology, and anti-Zionists need to see strategic secession as a key to serious political influence.

Talk to Anthony for more detailed activism suggestions.

Bonus positivity (Christian-Mohammendan solidarity!) happening in Scotland:

http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/top-stories/episcopal-church-opens-doors-to-aberdeen-muslims-1-2843168

I discovered this article recently:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2510513/First-class-graduate-turns-down-100000-job-to-become-plasterer.html

I keep telling people that the closest thing we can have to economic ‘freedom’ is for everyone to have the opportunity of being in a job that is satisfying and makes a real contribution to the community. Freedom does not consist of being able to make money by playing the rules and loopholes of the system, since the only possible motivation is to make money rather than to work. Hence they are doing something they would rather not do, whereas the person motivated by work is doing something they do want to do (at least, to a greater extent than the person motivated only by money – the highest ideal is for them to want their mission to be accomplished so there is no need to do the work.) Contrast with the attitude of the usurer in Mandrake’s article, whose only aim seems to be to make money – at the expense of all honour and decency.

But finance is not the only job where one might feel their labour is unnecessary, and hence not have a sense of job satisfaction. In the article, it is the role of actuary that is rejected, which exists only because of the complications of the legal system and because society puts an irrational faith in it, as if we can ever hope to develop legislation that covers every possible situation and which has no loopholes. The truly free individual, seeing that this system is unnecessary and wasteful, would seek to destroy it. That is what much of our doctrine is about – the freedom to take matters into our own hands and reshape the world as we see fit, rather than living within the boundaries of a system that we do not agree with or having no system at all so that it is impossible for us to change things.