Anti-Zionist harvest: US Presidential Debate version

So I watched the first Clinton vs Trump debate. The following reviews pretty much summarize how I thought it went as a whole:

http://www.vox.com/2016/9/26/13066698/trump-debate-trade-fact-check

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/9/26/13067798/trump-clinton-first-debate

http://www.vox.com/2016/9/27/13068420/trump-debate-foreign-policy-hofstra

But my main reason for writing this post is to point out is that, during this debate, Trump was the only candidate who mentioned his good relations with Israel. The word “Israel” was absent from Clinton’s speaking throughout the entire event. This is a superficially insignificant but profoundly seismic rhetorical shift from the standard format in past debates when both ‘opposing’ candidates were guaranteed to each try to outboast the other regarding the importance of Israel as an ally to the US (including when the debate question had nothing to do with Israel). I am guessing Clinton has become aware that a large enough fraction of the Democrat grassroots are now anti-Israel enough - as we have documented previously – that it would be better for her campaign to leave Israel unmentioned unless specifically asked.

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-true-left-is-emerging/

A tiny step, admittedly, but we were the ones who made it happen. Now the Democrats need to be rewarded for this shift with election victory in November. This would facilitate us in subsequently pushing the shift even harder, and finally splitting the US two-party system into a pro-Israel (Republican) side and an anti-Israel (Democrat) side and thus a genuine bifurcation in foreign policy vision, as I have long maintained is wholly possible to achieve.

The alternative election outcome would be too disastrous to contemplate:

http://www.france24.com/en/20160925-trump-tells-netanyahu-hell-recognize-jerusalem-israels-undivided-capital

Republican candidate Donald Trump pledged Sunday in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s “undivided” capital if he is elected president.

Netanyahu met privately with Trump at his residence in Trump Tower a day before the New York billionaire faces off against Democratic rival Hillary Clinton for their first presidential debate.

“Trump acknowledged that Jerusalem has been the eternal capital of the Jewish people for over 3000 years, and that the United States, under a Trump administration, will finally accept the long-standing congressional mandate to recognize Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the state of Israel,” his campaign said in a statement.

Israel captured the Arab eastern half of Jerusalem during the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, and annexed it in 1980, declaring all of Jerusalem Israel’s unified capital.

The United States — and most other UN member countries — do not recognize the annexation and consider Jerusalem’s final status to be a key issue to be resolved in peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

The US Congress passed a law in October 1995 calling for an undivided Jerusalem to be recognized as Israel’s capital and to authorize funding for moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

But no US president — Democrat or Republican — has implemented the law, regarding it as an infringement on the executive branch’s authority over foreign policy.

The Trump statement said he promised Netanyahu that the United States would provide Israel with “extraordinary strategic, technological and military cooperation” if he is elected.

“Mr Trump recognized Israel as a vital partner of the United States in the global war against radical Islamic terrorism,” it said.

“They discussed at length the nuclear deal with Iran, the battle against ISIS and many other regional security concerns.”

The campaign said they also discussed Israel’s experience with the security fence” used to wall off Israel from the West Bank.

Trump has made building a wall along the US-Mexico border a signature campaign promise.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 18 Comments

Recalling the anti-Zionist sowing season

A good thing to do during this anti-Zionist harvest time is to look across the fields and recollect how, not so long ago, we were diligently tilling the empty soil and planting seeds, faithful in the value of our toil.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matters-anti-semitic-bedfellows-17701

Obsessed with spreading demonization of the Jewish state across the Western world by any means necessary and at any cost, time and again anti-Israel campaigners have fought tooth and nail to insert defamatory anti-Israel language into resolutions and bylaws of unions, NGOs, political parties and other institutions advancing unrelated progressive agendas. Time and again, this hijacking has driven more enlightened activists out of the host movement, contributing to its decline.

Yes, but the people involved in each such declined movement didn’t disappear, not did they abandon their left-leaning views. These movements declined because the people inside them realized that the ideology behind them were not radical enough, and therefore began seeking out better foundations, which necessarily meant discontinuing the old movements and building new movements from the ground up.

The phenomenon was first evident during the lead-up to the 1991 Gulf War, when many Jewish American peace activists encountered a threatening environment at antiwar rallies due to aggressive anti-Zionist campaigning. “I didn’t feel comfortable or safe outside the Jewish contingent,” said Betsy Tessler, leader of the Philadelphia chapter of the staunchly antiwar New Jewish Agenda.

By the time the next Gulf War came around, militant anti-Zionists had become far more organized and determined not merely to piggyback their issue onto the antiwar agenda, but to push out those who were unwilling to accept it. The antiwar movement was primarily led by two far-left coalitions, International ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) and United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ), an uneasy partnership strained greatly by the former’s promotion of anti-Zionist activists before the war even began. When Tikkun editor and leading UFPJ leader Michael Lerner openly criticized the anti-Israeli bent of the demonstrations in January 2003, ANSWER banned him from speaking at its rallies. This led to a splintering in UFPJ and an overall weakening of the antiwar movement.

What this article deliberately avoids mentioning is the infusion of the anti-war movement with awareness of the 9/11 false flag and that Israel was behind it. One of the first groups we approached was none other than the ANSWER Coalition, as it was obvious that nothing would implode the war narrative and negative stereotyping of Muslims faster than realization that 9/11 was a planned deception designed to promote the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and encourage Islamophobia.

Much the same thing happened to the Occupy Wall Street movement that swept through New York and other major U.S. cities in 2011. The official Twitter account of the main OWS leadership in New York briefly endorsed the so-called “Freedom Waves Flotilla” that attempted to break through the Israeli blockade of Gaza in November 2011, while Occupy Oakland had an “Intifada tent” and the official Occupy Boston web site promoted an “emergency march” on the city’s Israeli consulate. Mainstream OWS organizers refused to denounce protesters who carried anti-Israeli, and often brazenly anti-Jewish, signs and banners.

Daniel Jonathan Sieradski, a liberal Jewish writer and activist who led a well-attended Kol Nidre prayer service across the street from the protests in Zuccotti Park on Yom Kippur, warned that the growing infusion of anti-Israel messaging into official OWS activities was leading “many Jewish supporters of OWS who do not identify as anti-Zionist” to believe “that they could no longer be associated with the movement.” “Once this movement becomes explicitly anti-Israel, you’ll have effectively alienated three times more people than you’ll attract,” he predicted. Within a few months, the movement was effectively dead.

Why was it dead, though? Because OWS was essentially an anarchist movement opposed to leadership (especially autocracy) and all violence, therefore all the serious activists who understood the need for autocratic leadership and willingness to use retaliatory violence to defeat an enemy as powerful as Jewry figured out that OWS was a useless movement to stay in despite its elementary good intentions.

A related dynamic was evident in the unraveling of Britain’s Labour Party this spring, driven by the reluctance of Jeremy Corbyn and others to disavow a small minority of radical anti-Zionists within the party’s ranks. Britain’s Jewish community, which “once looked to Labour as its natural home,” wrote leftist Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland, one of the country’s leading Jewish journalists, “is fast reaching the glum conclusion that Labour has become a cold house for Jews.”

It’s difficult to find a progressive cause that hasn’t been compromised in some way by the so-called Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, from the antiglobalization movement to the fight against sexual assault. “BDS destroys everything it touches,” observes Cornell law professor William A. Jacobson.

We destroy whatever proves unworthy of us, primarily by showing its well-meaning followers that they could be part of building something better instead of staying with something which will never give them the result they want because it was never designed to.

What accounts for this extraordinary nihilism on the part of supposedly progressive BDS activists? Holding an extreme position on Israel is one thing—that can be the result of ideology, religious beliefs, ignorance or something else. Being willing to sacrifice all other causes and concerns ordinarily convergent with one’s worldview for the sake of hurting the Jewish state is something altogether different.

This unusual grade of obsessive, self-destructive antipathy is a hallmark of classical eliminationist anti-Semitism. Unlike ordinary intergroup prejudice “found in the suspicion and resentment which are often directed against neighbors of another tribe, another race, another faith, or from another place,” explains historian Bernard Lewis, anti-Semitism is a “special and peculiar hatred” that attributes to Jews “secret and diabolical power.”

What Lewis calls “ordinary intergroup prejudice” is ethnobigotry. What Lewis calls “special and peculiar hatred” is Amalekism. So of course they are “unlike”. The question is: which of the two represents a higher moral level?

Although anti-Semites often go to great pains to avoid expressing their hatred as anti-Jewish (indeed, they coined the term “anti-Semitism” itself as a politically correct euphemism for Judenhass), this unique cognitive signature is easy enough to spot—just take a measurement of what the subjects are prepared to sacrifice to harm Jews.

This is an outright lie. “Anti-Semitism” was a term coined by Jews themselves to obfuscate Jewishness within a linguistic category called “Semite” that includes non-Jews, so as to portray hostility towards Jews as a form of racism, rather than as an anti-racist response to Jewish racism towards non-Jews.

This is not to say that there exist no actual anti-Semites (ie. those who are hostile to non-Jewish Semites as well as to Jewish Semites), but those are rightists. Leftists view non-Jewish Semites as fellow victims of Jewish racism, and therefore stand with them.

To date, however, mainstream liberals in America have been reluctant to call out the anti-Semites wreaking havoc within the ranks of the Left. If black lives—or socioeconomic justice, peace, women’s rights, etc.—really matter to them, why have they allowed the cancer to metastasize this long?

Because they are in the middle of a struggle within their own minds about whether to remain False Leftists or to become True Leftists. We have faith that they will make the correct decision, and look forward to hearing from more and more of them in the near future:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

RoboCop 3 becoming real

Eric Zemmour (Jew) proudly announces what I worriedly predicted years ago:

In the following interview Mr. Zemmour discusses the Islamization of France, the expansion of the no-go zones, and the inevitability of a French military response to Muslim colonization. One of the most intriguing revelations in this interview is his assertion that the French military has consulted with its Israeli counterparts for advice on how to re-conquer the “sensitive urban zones” that have been lost to French control.

“The plan is already written. It is called “Operation Ronce”. It was designed with the help of the specialists for the Israeli army. … They went to see the specialists from the Israeli army and, the French that explained this to me, told me that, like they did a Gaza, they would advise them to do the same; they explained to them how to proceed, because Israelis are the specialists, of course, and so the French plan is ready.”

http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/09/eric-zemmour-the-french-have-become-foreigners-in-their-own-country/

If this is not a wakeup call as to how serious the ZC threat is, I honestly don’t know what is. The present government is unlikely to implement this plan, but if the far-right come into power in the future, I guarantee they will have no qualms about doing so. This is what we must prevent. (If you haven’t seen Robocop 3, please do so.)

If you are a solider in the French armed forces, it is your duty to open fire on your officers if they order you to attack innocent people. People simply living in so-called “no-go zones” (which cost the state nothing and indeed saves money for the state, as they refuse the usual state-provided social services, which enables these services to focus on serving the neighbourhoods which do want them) are innocent; they are merely rejecting democracy, which is what everyone should be doing anyway, because democracy is the very system ultimately asserting that a majority of voters wanting soldiers to attack innocents is enough reason for soldiers to do as the majority wants. It is not. A true soldier’s most fundamental duty is to combat initiated violence, and thus to stand against democracy which potentially condones any initiated violence so long as it is sufficiently popular:

http://aryanism.net/philosophy/violence/

If you are a resident of the neighbourhoods targeted by this plan, make sure you own firearms (rifles at the very least; handguns are virtually useless) and other supplies, and get organized:

http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/preparedness/

http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/paramilitary/

The best response to enemies who claim based on your ethnic background or religion that you are somehow “not French” (as Zemmour was insinuating above) is to simply show them this picture:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/EmpireFrench.png

We would love to hear from you! Contact us:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

(And one more thing: does anyone really believe that France is the only country which the IDF has been helping to lay this type of plan? It is likely that similar plans exist in many Zionist countries, except they merely haven’t announced them yet. So this is far from just a French problem.)

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 12 Comments

It’s not that difficult…..

Italy is one country where a working model for refugee resettlement has already been developed, which I first drew attention to last year using the example of Riace. Now more and more villages are participating:

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2016/04/refugee-settlement-programs-save-dying-italian-villages-160421113908416.html

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/08/syrian-refugees-revive-italian-village-camini-160830065301496.html

The question is: why aren’t other EU countries (except Scotland, as also previously noted), Germany in particular, emulating this model? There are villages and small towns dotted all over the map, yet the governments would rather keep refugees concentrated in asylum centres that are not only increasingly overcrowded and hence increases stress among occupants and volunteers alike, but also make refugees easy targets for far-right arson and other terror attacks. Unless, of course, Merkel is – as we have suspected long ago – deliberately trying to do a spectacularly bad job of handling the refugee crisis in order to bring on the Zionist-scripted backlash right on schedule, as can now be seen in the increasing popularity of the AfD…..

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/04/europe/germany-alternative-fur-deutschland-afd-angela-merkel/

(Isn’t it suspicious how little media coverage has been given to Italy’s village revival approach to the refugee influx, especially compared to the fence-building approach of Hungary etc.? It’s as if they want people to think that, because it is inefficient to keep refugees in asylum centres, therefore it is acceptable to let them starve on the border rather than try alternative resettlement schemes.)

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 6 Comments

Anti-Zionist harvest contd.

http://www.newsmax.com/AlanDershowitz/black-lives-matter-bds-lgbt/2016/08/24/id/745027/

Last year, Rabbi Susan Talve, a longtime activist on race issues in the St. Louis area was told that her advocacy for Israel was incompatible with the objectives of Black Lives Matter: “Solidarity from Ferguson to Palestine has become a central tenet of the movement” she was informed, because “Israeli and U.S. state oppression are deeply interconnected.”

Similarly, a student who attended a Black Lives Matter rally at Northwestern University last year was told “you support Israel, so you cannot also support us.”

Recently, that seems to be the response of many of the activists who dominate so-called “progressive” social justice movements.

The self-described “progressive wing” of the Democratic Party — represented by radical and often repressive organizations such as MoveOn, CodePink, Occupy Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter — has become openly opposed to the nation state of the Jewish people.

Increasingly, these organizations demand that their members and “allies” renounce support for Israel and for Zionism in order to belong.

Earlier this year, supporters of the LGBTQ community in Israel learned this lesson the hard way, when BDS activists together with a local Black Lives Matter chapter broke up a gay pride event, because it featured a presentation by an Israeli group.

The protesters claimed that the event organizers had engaged in “pinkwashing” the Israeli occupation by showing solidarity with the Israeli LGBTQ community.

Members of the National Women’s Studies Association (“NWSA”) who also support Israel have been similarly excluded. Last year, that organization voted to endorse BDS, and as one pro-BDS activist explained: “What is significant about this particular resolution is the rationale; the fact that the resolution makes it explicit that BDS is a feminist issue … that one cannot call themselves a feminist … without taking a stand on what is happening in Palestine.”

Their hostility towards Israel does not stem from any particular Israeli actions or policies. Even if Israel were to withdraw from the West Bank, destroy the security barrier, and recognize Hamas as a legitimate political organization, it would still not be enough.

For these radicals, it is not what Israel does; it is about what Israel is: the nation state of the Jewish people, or to use hard-left terminology: an imperialistic, apartheid and genocidal, colonialist enterprise. The recently released Black Lives Matter policy platform offers a perfect example of such extreme rhetoric: It states that U.S. military and economic support for Israel makes American citizens complicit in “the genocide taking place against the Palestinian people.”

The fact that the BLM platform reads like it was lifted from a BDS screed is hardly coincidence: the two groups enjoy a longstanding relationship, and a prominent BDS activist apparently helped draft elements of the BLM declaration. But BLM is far from the only hard-left organization that has been infected by BDS vitriol. In fact, BDS has pressured a wide range of progressive organizations into assuming an anti-Israel posture.

The American Green Party, for example, which has become a haven for disaffected progressive activists this election cycle, recently came out in support of BDS and called for the U.S. to end its support for “the Israeli apartheid regime.”

This trend has been particularly pronounced on college campuses, where a host of academic groups — most absurdly the Native American Scholars Association and the Americans Studies Association — have passed resolutions in favor of BDS.

Many of these organizations have also endorsed the Palestinian Academic and Cultural Boycott (“PACBI”), which encourages participants to engage in McCarthyite blacklisting of Israeli academic institutions, as well as groups and individuals who promote “Brand Israel.” This category apparently includes artists like Matisyahu, and academics like me, as I found out last year when a prominent BDS advocate refused to debate me at the Oxford Student Union.

The PACBI also explicitly denounces “normalization projects,” programs or events aimed at Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation that do not sufficiently emphasize the colonialist nature of the state of Israel.

BDS campaigners want to force any supporters of Israel, no matter their stances on other political issues, outside of the progressive tent.

Now is the time to ride our own wave.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 2 Comments

Anti-Zionist harvest

Having been sowing the anti-Zionist seeds year in and year out since the mid-2000s, and having witnessed the horror of many of our seeds hijacked by the BS camp from the late-2000s schism onwards, it is truly a reward to be able to see at least some of those seeds grow as they were meant to:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/08/23/so-youre-a-jew-and-youre-starting-college-prepare-for-anti-zionism/

If you’re Jewish, you should probably also prepare yourself for the various forms of anti-Israel sentiment, and maybe even anti-Semitism, you’re likely to encounter on your new college campus.

In the past year alone, as a Jewish student at McGill University in Montreal, I’ve been called a “Zionist b—-.” I’ve been told several times that Jews haven’t suffered (never mind the Spanish Inquisition, Eastern European pogroms and centuries of violence and marginalization leading up to the Holocaust). I’ve seen my friends mocked for their Judaism in crude, hateful language on popular anonymous social media platforms. When I asked if a student publication would write about instances of anti-Semitism on campus in its end-of-year issue, I was told that those instances were already covered in “mainstream Zionist media.”

By no means do I defend every action of the Israeli government, but Israel as a Jewish homeland plays an integral role in my identity. I love Israel and firmly believe in its right to exist, just as I believe in a Palestinian state. I also consider myself a liberal and care deeply about a range of injustices, including gender inequality, homophobia and the racial opportunity gap.

Yet so many of my liberal peers, with whom I share so much common ground, have actively excluded Jewish students from their social-justice organizations. The activist community’s demonization of Israel is apparent again and again in my interactions on campus. These clubs propagate the idea that Zionism underpins many of the world’s problems, as well as claim that Jews have no right to feel connected to Israel and that any Jew who does feel a connection to his or her religious homeland is part of the problem. Despite many of our shared values, my Jewish peers’ and my attempts to reach out to these groups have often been dismissed.

Because they are not liberals any more. They have already started the shift towards becoming True Leftists. They have started to care about internal consistency in their positions, and have understood that identitarianism and social justice are mutually exclusive, and therefore that Jews who claim to care about social justice, while retaining support for Jewishness, Judaism and Israel, are LYING.

As you begin your journey as a Jewish college student, you may find that the students involved in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) against Israel, which is on the rise on campuses across North America, are the same students who are active in feminist collectives, LGBT groups, environmental organizations and anti-racism clubs. As a Zionist, this can be extremely disheartening — why should you be alienated from a cause because you believe Israel has a right to exist?

To all you pre-schism Jew-aware activists out there who many years ago told me not to waste my time trying to convert leftists to anti-Zionism, face it: you were never worried about me wasting my time, you were worried about me succeeding. You actively wanted leftists to continue siding with Jews so that leftists could be portrayed as PC cowards and hence rightists would gain credibility by being the only non-PC side in the discussion. This is now no longer possible. By leftists turning anti-Zionist while remaining staunchly leftist on other issues, rightists have lost what was their single most – perhaps even only – effective line of propaganda against leftists.

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/standing-with-israel/59321-why-christian-zionism-is-vanishing-in-the-american-church

As the Millennial generation takes positions of leadership in the evangelical churches of America, we may see Christian Zionism and support for Israel vanish. It is a process that is already underway.

Today’s 20-year-olds and 30-year-olds think of themselves as well-informed about Israel’s role in the Middle East and its struggle with the Palestinian people. They are likely to feel strong empathy with the oppressed Palestinian people, and they unanimously join the rest of the world in condemning the State of Israel.

today’s young evangelical Christians are far more likely to march under the slogan, “End the Occupation,” than the slogan, “We stand with Israel.” They are following in the footsteps of mainstream denominations such as the Presbyterian Church in the USA, which sponsors boycotts on Israeli products and has published statements condemning the State of Israel for their occupation of Palestine.

And to all you pre-schism Jew-aware activists out there who told me to just give up on Christianity altogether, I’m glad I didn’t listen to you either.

In the view of anti-Zionists, Israel is unworthy of Christian support because it is home to Jews who have rejected Jesus as their Messiah. Anti-Zionist evangelicals contend that support for Israel thwarts efforts to share the Christian faith with Muslims in the Middle East. (In other words, Christianity would be more attractive to Islam if we could present it to them as anti-Jewish and anti-Israel.)

This last sentence is what I have been saying all along. This is the key to fulfilling the prophecy of the Second Christ and the Mahdi fighting side by side against the Antichrist/Dajjal/Jewish Messiah. I still believe firmly in this prophecy. How many more times must I demonstrate my prescience before all of you out there (I’m addressing the lurkers, not our team members) start taking this prophecy seriously enough to join us in working towards it? Because, just like all the other stuff above, Christian-Mohammedan solidarity will not happen unless we do the long, patient and mostly thankless work needed to make it happen. But I would not be asking you to do such work in the first place if I had any less than absolute confidence that, if done well, it will not be done in vain.

So what are you waiting for? Join us!

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 61 Comments

BLM-BDS allied!

In July when I posted the BLM link calling out the Dallas false flag, I already knew that anti-Zionism was just one step away from gaining a new ally. A month later, I am happy to extend my humble welcome and warm regards to arguably the highest-profile American social movement in recent years now that we are officially on the same side of the issue:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-platform-black-lives-matter-accuses-israel-of-genocide-backs-bds/

“Israel is an apartheid state with over 50 laws on the books that sanction discrimination against the Palestinian people,” it continued. “Palestinian homes and land are routinely bulldozed to make way for illegal Israeli settlements. Israeli soldiers also regularly arrest and detain Palestinians as young as 4 years old without due process. Every day, Palestinians are forced to walk through military checkpoints along the US-funded apartheid wall.”

At the end of this section, the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel is advertised as a resource, along with a website for Black-Palestinian solidarity.

The platform was released by The Movement for Black Lives, an umbrella group of more than 50 organizations, including the Black Lives Matter Network, the Black Liberation Collective, and the Center for Constitutional Rights, which often promotes the Palestinian cause.

Over the past two years, there has been much speculation over attempts by the pro-Palestinian movement to converge with Black Lives Matter and other social justice-related campaigns.

This is how you build bridges:

At the Republican National Convention two weeks ago, an attempt to present such a coalition was on display. Abbas Hamideh, 41, of the Palestine Right to Return Coalition, told The Times of Israel he was in Cleveland to protest GOP nominee Donald Trump with Black Lives Matter activists.

“As Palestinians, we stand in solidarity with them. We have been colonized for over 68 years, so it is a natural bond, it is a natural alliance for us,” he said.

Hamideh went on to say he opposed a two-state solution and the very notion of a Jewish state, and that he promotes “a free Palestine from the river to the sea,” repeating a chant associated with the Hamas terrorist organization.

The potential was there long ago:

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/erin-aitcheson/2015/10/14/blmpalestinian-video-released-amid-terror-attacks-israelis

so all it took was the initiative to do further outreach and close the deal. And now the Axum alliance is back. Those – not only our enemies but also pessimists who supposedly support us - who kept telling me it would never happen and that trying to make it happen was just a waste of time now know better.

For many years I have watched Jews and their useful idiots push their narrative that all “Muslims” (by which they actually mean ”non-black” Semitic Muslims) despise “blacks”. In fact just the other day in the blog comments Henrik Jensen was posting a link to this effect. Of course, anyone who actually bothers to look around would know that this is simply not true:

http://i0.wp.com/masetv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/palestine-to-ferguson.jpg

http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/IMG_20160805_061525-e1470393494626.jpg

As I always say, if they are so confident that such an alliance could never form, why do they bother to tell us about it? Whenever they tell us that such an alliance could never form, what they really mean is that they fear it forming enough to try to sabotage it before it does, but are too ashamed to admit it.

I would love to hear from any BLM member who wishes to contact us:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

For now, I have just one piece of extremely important advice for BLM: buy firearms and ammunition, and train in paramilitary discipline. “Hands up, don’t shoot!” will not protect you. Don’t believe me? Ask the Palestinians.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 42 Comments

Rio Olympics 2016

The Olympics are back, and fellow anti-Zionist Sarra Besbes was competing again in fencing just earlier, and of course I was cheering for her to win. Unfortunately she did not medal. I would have loved to see her win gold considering her past career sacrifices for the sake of BDS. We have covered Besbes on the blog in the past, but here is her story again for those who are unaware:

At the 2011 World Championships in Catania, Besbes noticed she would fight an Israeli athlete during the qualifications phase. She asked the Tunisian Fencing Federation for instructions; the Ministry of Youth and Sports ordered her to drop the bout as part of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign.[2] Instead of refusing the fight, which would have resulted in sanctions, Besbes remained completely passive during her bout against Noam Mills, allowing the latter to strike without offering any resistance.[3] This 5–0 defeat affected her seeding: in her first direct elimination bout she met eventual gold medallist Li Na of China and was largely overcome. Besbes commented afterwards: “I did my duty.”[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarra_Besbes

Besides wanting Israel banned from the Olympics in the same way that Apartheid South Africa was banned from the Olympics:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid-era_South_Africa_and_the_Olympics

another thing we want removed are the equestrian events (this also means updating the pentathlon), as previously discussed. (Aside, the IOC decision to include golf creates an unsightly clash with Rio 2016′s well-meaning environmentalist theme…..) More generally, I would like to see a more balanced roster of Olympic sports with origins from around the world. Feel free to discuss which particular sports currently not part of the roster you would like to see included in future Olympics.

The Olympics are also one of the best opportunities for understanding racial idealism. While the racial tunnel-visioners will no doubt obsess over ethnicity-based observations (e.g. “Look at how black the 100m sprint finalists are!”), the observations we as National Socialists should be making are the far more meaningful quality-based observations, such as how the athletes (of all ethnic backgrounds) competing in one sport share common heritable traits which differ from those of the athletes (again of all ethnic backgrounds) competing in another sport with different executional demands. Look at the body shape of all the sprinters, for example, and how they look nothing like the body shape of all the weightlifters. Sure, the 100m sprint finals may be overwhelmingly “black”, but if we put a random ”black” Olympic weightlifter against a random “white” Olympic sprinter, who would you bet on winning a 100m sprint, or – more to the point – whose bloodline would you select for breeding towards a Sprinter racial ideal? The reverse also applies. This is why thinking about about race in terms of ethnicity is IDIOTIC. (This used to be so obvious that it required no explanation. That today I feel the need to write a full paragraph elucidating such an obvious point for the benefit of people who might have been fooled by racial tunnel vision propaganda is depressing in itself.)

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 4 Comments

Support Joy Karega!

http://nypost.com/2016/08/03/professor-who-blamed-jews-for-911loses-her-job/

Karega has made a string of weird claims on her social media, such as:

  • Last year, she posted a video of Louis Farrakhan explaining how Israeli forces rigged the Twin Towers with explosives which really brought down buildings. Karega wrote: “Farrakhan is truth-telling in this video.”
  • ISIS is a CIA and Mossad creation so “Israeli and Zionists Jews” could carry out new 9/11-style attacks.
  • Following the Charlie Hebdo attacks, Karega said the killings were secretly planned by Jews as punishment against France for being too supportive of Palestinians. “This ain’t even hard. They unleashed Mossad in France and it’s clear why.”

It’s always refreshing to see serious anti-Zionists (as opposed to Red-Pilled useful idiots) speaking up. For those new to the scene, it is vital that you do not confuse the two groups. Serious anti-Zionists are concerned with subjects such as the inherently racist teachings of Judaism (also carried over into Judeo-Christianity), the existence of Israel and the plans for Greater Israel, Jewish and crypto-Jewish overrepresentation in banking, politics, industry, commerce, law, medicine, academia, etc. and otherwise sayanim infiltration around the world that facilitate Israeli political and technological espionage, false flag terror, slow chemical warfare, falsification of history (e.g. ‘Holocaust’) and other operations to the ultimate benefit of Israel and the Jewish diaspora, and other serious issues, as well as practical countermeasures. Red-Pilled useful idiots are concerned mostly about their own petty peeves such as Islam, “Third World” immigration, feminism, LGBT, post-1960s counterculture in general and “black” men having sex with “white” women in particular, but merely blame these phenomena on “Jewish conspiracy” as an excuse to avoid having to debate these topics on ethical grounds because they know they would lose such debates – instead they can now simply accuse anyone who defends the leftist positions on these issues as a collaborator(!) in the “Jewish conspiracy”.

If Karega happens to be reading this, please consider joining our movement, as we have been saying the same things on these subjects that you have been saying, and for much longer. You are welcome to contact us any time:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 15 Comments

The Zionist masterstroke: alibi prevention

We have watched false flag after false flag – Nice truck attack, Wuerzburg axe attack, etc. – happening this month (again, note that in every such case the scapegoats suspects are killed on the spot), and conspiracy blogs/channels have been working overtime pointing out suspicious elements in the official stories non-stop, and even some mainstream journalists are noticing these elements:

[Translated from French] Panic and incomprehension in the office of mayor of Nice. On Wednesday at 11am the Anti-Terrorism Sub-Directorate (SDAT) sent agents who manage video surveillance of the city a requisition citing Articles 53 and L706-24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article R642-1 of the Penal Code, asking them for a “complete” erasure of 24 hours of images from six cameras named and numbered, but also of all the scenes from the beginning of the attack that took place on the Promenade des Anglais, on the night of July 14.

“This is the first time we have been asked to destroy evidence.”

The state agents of the urban supervision center of Nice are stunned. “This is the first time we have been asked to destroy evidence,” says a source close to the investigation. “The CCTV center and the city of Nice could be prosecuted for this, and also the officers in charge of the device don’t have jurisdiction to engage in such operations.”

The request is all the more astonishing given that since last Friday the SDAT sent its servers to recover the 30,000 hours of CCTV related to the events. A backup operation that will extend over several days. “We do not know that giving a destruction order while we are in full backup is not going to affect the whole system,” the investigators say with concern.

“This was done in this particular case to prevent the uncontrolled spread of these images.” — The Paris prosecutor.

Contacted by Le Figaro, the Paris prosecutor’s office confirmed the information and said: “This was done in this case to prevent the uncontrolled and unchecked dissemination of these images.” The national police remind that “out of the thousand cameras in Nice, 140 had elements relevant to the investigation. The police recovered 100% of them. The Judicial Police and prosecutors have asked for the pictures from these 140 cameras to be deleted

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2016/07/21/01016-20160721ARTFIG00225-attentat-de-nice-quand-la-justice-demande-a-la-mairie-de-detruire-24-heures-d-images.php

(This is on a par with sending the metal from the collapsed WTC buildings to be melted down immediately after 9/11 so that they could not be examined to expose a controlled demolition. Anyone with a working mind can guess that in the truck attack they need to hide the switching out of the probable Mossad agent who actually drove the truck and the switching in of the shot-dead scapegoat suspect. Similarly in the axe attack, the probable Mossad agent who actually did the attack was allowed to flee a distance of 1/2 km from the train (allowing ample time to switch him out) before police finally shot the scapegoat ‘him’.)

Nevertheless, none of this effort to expose the false flags is succeeding in turning around popular opinion, which continues to become more Islamophobic and hostile to refugees. Why? Because, once again, Jews understand (Gentile) majority psychology better than we do. In particular, they understand that the majority really do not believe that people are innocent until proven guilty, as already exemplified in the Colohoax (which, incidentally, most of the media continue to report as though a mere one-sided accusation of an attack means an attack actually happened e.g. 1200 people filing police reports alleging attack are unbelievably referred to as “1200 victims”):

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-colocaust/

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/colohoax-confirmed/

It counts for virtually nothing how much work the clear-thinking minority put in to point out how the official stories simply do not add up: the prejudiced majority do not care about this. The inferior majority, once already incited into belief that a “Muslim refugee” did it (as they believe was the case in the axe attack as well as most of the Colohoax allegations), will cling to their prejudice despite all the holes in the official story being highlighted. 

What the majority really believe is that people whom they regard as part of their out-group are guilty until proven innocent. As such, the only way to get the majority to even reconsider their position is hard evidence of innocence. And it is here that Zionists played their move well in advance, namely by preventing (via complicated international “human rights” laws) the states taking in refugees from putting the refugees to work, which is what states should be doing on ethical grounds anyway, as explained previously:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/empathy-not-human-rights/

If the refugees were on state-organized labour shifts under rigorous 24-hour state supervision, they would have an incontrovertible alibi to protect them against subsequent Zionist scapegoating. It would be impossible to falsely accuse them of committing a crime since they would be able to prove that they were at a well-defined other location (namely their workplace) at the time when the crime occurred. By ensuring they are idle, the Zionist scheme is to preclude them from having a solid alibi, since it is now becomes hard for them to prove they were elsewhere at the time of the attack. This makes it easy to scapegoat them whether by false accusation (as in the Colohoax) or by false flag (as in recent attacks). If the refugees resort to testimony by other refugees whom they hang out with to prove they were elsewhere, this only further aids the Zionist agenda by now being able to accuse refugees for covering up for each other (and be believed by the prejudiced majority), thus fueling hostility towards refugees as a whole!

Which goes back to what we have been saying all along: it will take a supremely ethical ideology to truly defeat Zionism. Jews always start with structural unethicality in the system which they then manipulate to create mass hostility towards the wrong targets, and in such a way that no amount of subsequent exposure of the manipulation will suffice to dispel the hostility, because majority prejudice has already been set in place by the initial manipulation – as we saw after 9/11, as we see again recently, and as we will continue to see in more false flags and false accusations yet to come – all for the Zionist backlash agenda of increasing Islamophobia and thereby increasing support for the Israel-emulating far-right:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/leading-republicans-plumb-the-depths-of-racist-islamophobia_us_578fb296e4b004b4c9a3cf6a

……………………………… OK, and now I have just read that another attack has happened in Munich literally while I was writing this post. Again, initial reports of at least three shooters have rapidly turned into an official story of yet another “lone gunman” who then conveniently ”killed himself” immediately after the attack. Can you figure out what is going on? More importantly, can you figure out what the inferior majority will surely continue to insist is going on despite our best attempts to explain otherwise? And most importantly of all, can you figure out who benefits?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KtzdP7mR-4

_____

UPDATE

BREAKING! Same Israeli photo-propagandist pre-positioned in Nice AND NOW MUNICH

What are the odds that a guy with the background of Richard Gutjahr – married to a leading Israeli black operator – would “just happen to be there” to film the very beginning of the Nice truck attack AND today’s shooting at the Olympia Mall in Munich, Germany? Coincidence theorists will have a field day with this!

As I wrote in my latest article on the Nice attack:

The cameraman apparently pre-placed on the balcony to film the beginning of the truck attack is German journalist and blogger named Richard Gutjahr…who just happens to be married to Israeli potentate Einat Wilf, a former Israeli Intelligence Officer in Unit 8200 who served as foreign policy advisor to Shimon Peres, strategic consultant to MacKenzie and Co. in New York, and a general partner in Core Venture Capital in Israel. In 2007 she ran for the presidency of the World Jewish Congress. (The presence of highly-placed Israelis and friends in strategic positions to film terror events is getting out of hand…we saw the same thing with the Charlie Hebdo and Brussels Airport events.)

And now he’s right in the middle of the shooting in Munich. Jim Dean is right, you can’t make this stuff up.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/07/22/nice-munich/

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 28 Comments