The reason I haven’t been posting much is because it has become so obvious by now that if you still need an explanation, you are probably not the kind of person we are looking for.

America is hard to see yet she makes herself felt like some fatal Crack of Doom.  She is a great mystery much like Our Beloved Fuhrer.  Few can understand her and fewer still will ever love her.  She moves with the violence of  a shaggy primeval wolfpack flying through ancient forests and it’s always best not to get in her way.  She is Liberty; she knows what she wants, whether true liberty or false.

Billions claim to worship her yet don’t even care enough about her to notice that her National Founder was William the Conqueror.   Her Voice is William Shakespeare, her Inspiration is George Washington, her Prophet is Ezra Pound and the hero who rules over her innermost soul and is calling her into her emerging destiny goes by the name of John Wilkes Booth.  How many men can truly love this historic America?

The proto-American birthcry of the Chanson de Roland at the Battle of Hastings (1066) led to the Holy Crusades.  America is nothing if not the cry of berserker Crusaders rampaging through gory streets of Jerusalem with their vocal ejaculation:  Hierusalem est perdita!  Or, in the language of our own time:  Juden Tod!  Hence the Zionist insanity of the current mixed-race  “American government” is unamerican beyond all measure.  Whether justified or not, the skin color of the reigning “American President” promises  a hatred of the Zionist Entity in White America that would put the Waffen S.S. to shame.  But no Aryan ever said the masses were rational!  The “Tea Party” is but the flimsy cover of a Southern and ethnic white Confederate displeasure that does not bode well for our enemies.  Secession is in the air and the ruling politicians look exactly like black deer caught in the headlights of the Ku Klux Klan.  White America is armed to the teeth and suffers from an excessive love of hunting.

If the Federal American attempt to recoup their imperial losses is too extreme it will only lead, within the fifty states, to an even more extreme backlash for states-rights sovereignty.  The best option would be to abandon Israel First global genocide in favor of an American Confederation that would tend to its own internal challenges.  The worst might be a Saudi-backed operation we’d rather not contemplate…

Can Arya wisely direct this gathering storm?  Or will the Negroes pay for the crimes of Zion? Certainly the “American” Jews are not stupid and are aware of the benefits of deflecting White anger towards a different target.  Within America the face of Islam is decidedly seen as Black and the subliminal message of the Judaic media is that the Palestinians are somehow Negroes in disguise who voted for Obama and are threatening the wondrously white Aryan citizens of the Judenstadt.  What is wrong with this picture?  The Jews want us to lynch a Negro-Palestinian for Jesus.  Our Judeo-Christian enemy are a Pharisee “den of vipers” indeed!

It is relevant to note that the great explorer of the American colonies, Captain John Smith, was a devoted admirer of Islam, as were Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson.  We should present the Palestinians as civilized friends of the Founding Fathers of the Republic and as natural allies in our struggle against the Wahhabi Saudi “Barbary Pirates” and their fanatic fundamentalist rabbinic confreres in a barbaric Dark Age blood-drinking Judenstadt ghetto, to put this in a more American historic context.  We also don’t have to forbid nativist prejudice against Islam because the Muslim community shows no desire to integrate with non-Muslims.

The hoods with eye-slits of Islamic freedom-fighters can be associated with the Klan garb of some Confederate freedom-fighters while the black colors of the rising Turkic-Persian Caliphate and its Jihad can be associated with the black dress of the Aryan S.S. and Italian Fascists.  Obviously the green of Islam also blends well with environmental concerns.  These themes could make mince-meat of the malevolent Judaic anti-Negro/Muslim propaganda blitz.  For Our Lord Lucifer is a God of Light and Reason; He does not approve of lynching Negroes or of inbred medieval ghettos with their vampire rabbis!

Now if only Osama will spare Obama long enough to enable Arya to lead us all out of this death-black Kali Yuga!  May the sons of Booth show yet a little patience, though their well-oiled guns are fully loaded.

And may the Dawn of Lucifer commence.

As the year begins, there is no doubt that the US will attempt to reverse its loss of international influence over the last decade. The desired resurgence would have been best immediately upon Obama’s election, amongst the fervour felt more by the rest of the world than the American people themselves, which made it much easier to amend the errors of Bush’s administration. Despite discussion that Obama has done little that he has promised, this attitude is still prevalent. For this reason, 2010 will likely be a year of unprecedented expansionism. If we are ever to see a renewal of policies against Iran, Syria and Venezuela, then it is likely to occur this year.

Germán runs a good blog and YouTube channel on the situation in Iran which gives much insight into the claims and counter-claims of Iran and the USA, revolving around the protests of the last election and the nuclear programme. His blog gives politico-historical insights into US-Iranian relations and I suggest that his blog be used in educating anyone on the issues regarding Iran.

It seems that it is now or never for America. Obama’s administration will most likely be the final burst of virility experienced by America, and there should be no illusions as to whether this is realised by Jewry. While the financial crisis did weaken the US severely, the significance of the subsequent recession is in terms of the declining sustainability of America as world hegemon. With mounting debt, dissent and a largely unproductive population, only Obama’s ability to inspire the masses will possibly see America retain its position as a world power for the short and medium terms. Evidence of his success in inspiring an American advance can be seen with continuing high military spending, the success in recruitment for a new troop surge, as well the recent “Haiti expedition”.

Therefore, if Obama and the US do opt for expansion, as all signs seem to be indicating, then this will be a vital focus for propaganda efforts. Most likely, US expansionism will coincide with a more aggressive Israeli foreign policy. It should go without saying that propaganda regarding the Palestinians should be stepped-up; but also that of Lebanon, Syria, and more importantly, Iran. The failure so far of America and Israel in dealing with Iran can be partially attributed to the ability of activists in distributing propaganda. By increasing our propaganda efforts, any advances on Iran will be made much more difficult and costly for America and Israel.

Even after all this time, I still underestimate how low Jewish behaviour is willing to sink. Basically Jews killed a Palestinian child’s brother, took a photo of the child crying, edited the photo and used it for an ad asking for donations to Israel:

http://rainbowwarrior2005.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/us-charity-uses-little-palestinian-childs-photo-to-raise-money-for-israels-hungry

On the subject of donations, let me get in a quick word on the issue of donations to Haiti following the (possibly engineered) earthquake. In principle, I totally believe in charity, and – despite Zionist historians attempting to depict National Socialism as an uncaring ideology - Hitler not only promoted charity but considered only National Socialists capable of sincere compassion (as opposed to mere patronizing gestures of the same):

“If positive Christianity means love of one’s neighbour, i.e. the tending of the sick, the clothing of the poor, the feeding of the hungry, the giving of drink to those who are thirsty, then it is we who are the more positive Christians.” – Adolf Hitler

The current problem is that we can no longer trust the mainstream ’aid’ organizations, many of which have been actively involved in Zionist agendas such as forced vaccinations and forced water fluoridation. We cannot be sure whether any money we send will reach Haiti in the first place, nor can we be sure whether it will be used to actually help the Haitians:

http://voiceofvenom.com/blog/articles/jews-harvest-organs-in-haiti/

Therefore I suggest that, unless you personally know someone who lives around there and who can get things done directly with the money, do not donate. Instead, donate to the activists devoted to breaking the Jewish criminal power structure, only after which will genuine charity efforts have a chance to flourish.

From the Aryanist perspective, genuine charity should be about ending problems, not merely fixing them until they rise again. Therefore any charity that does not deal with reducing population and improving demographics is no charity at all. All poverty is created by population increase in a finite habitat. Everything else (industry, commerce, migration, etc.) does not create poverty, but merely changes how it is distributed in space and time. Genuine charity, therefore, must not be (as it currently is) just another of many influences on the distribution of poverty, but should focus its power on preventing its creation.

As I have said before (and as Hitler predicted), world population will decrease drastically very soon. If we do not decrease it ourselves, nature will decrease it for us. The difference is that natural selection is guaranteed to get rid of the kind, conscientious and honourable people (of all ethnicities), whereas National Socialism will at least attempt the opposite. Natural selection is guaranteed to leave behind a population of prolific, amoral survivalists which will not hesitate to explode its numbers all over the planet again in the future once conditions permit, whereas National Socialism aims to leave behind a population which will know better. This is what real charity should be about.

I am currently reading this book by Subverted Nation (Adam Austin) that was banned by Lulu just yesterday. It can be downloaded here:

http://www.subvertednation.net/documents/basic-training-for-revolutionaries.pdf

It is an annotated collection of quotations from both Jews and other historical figures, organized in such a way as to paint a full background to the struggle against Jewish domination. The main power of the book is that it allows the quoted to speak for themselves, leaving little room for accusations of defamation. The author’s own words, though few, also deserve praise for being motivational without becoming politically partisan (unlike my work). In addition, the book conveniently includes the full text of the Protocols of Zion, so I recommend that all anti-Zionists wishing to introduce more people to the Protocols from now on direct them to this book instead.

I found this quote (which was previously unknown to me) particularly resonant with the Aryanist perspective:

“Finally, there seem to be but three Ways for a Nation to acquire Wealth. The first is by War as the Romans did in plundering their conquered Neighbours. This is Robbery. The second by Commerce which is generally Cheating. The third by Agriculture the only honest Way; wherein Man receives a real Increase of the Seed thrown into the Ground, in a kind of continual Miracle wrought by the Hand of God in his favour, as a Reward for his innocent Life, and virtuous Industry.” – Benjamin Franklin

It is almost a total parallel to the hunter, herder and farmer archetypes to which I have referred on numerous occasions as a model to explain Gentile, Jewish and Aryan behaviour respectively. Perhaps in the post-Zionist future, these words of Franklin can help to inspire in Americans a return to a simpler, more ethical lifestyle. And to help reach this future as soon as possible, I recommend everyone living in the US to check out this group:

http://www.realoathkeepers.org/

How often do we read or hear the Jewish media telling us that we are a “tolerant” multiethnic society? And how often do we see the stupid, arrogant Gentile who thinks he has broken through Zionist brainwashing by turning to tribalism? The more I watch the situation unfold, the more I agree that Gentiles really are as idiotic as described in the Talmud.

What does the word “tolerance” really mean? It means putting up with something you dislike. Therefore, when the Jewish media declares – over and over again - that we are “tolerant”, what are they really programming within you? Are they programming you to respect other groups? No! They are programming you to hate other groups, and then reminding you how much you have put up with from other groups. Tolerance presumes disgust, or else there would be nothing requiring toleration. The Jewish media is saying: “You know and we know that everything wrong with society is caused by those anti-Semitic, anti-Western Third World immigrants, but let’s ignore this.” They are telling you to ignore an illusion that they themselves planted in your head!

If I tell you to ignore (Zionist) Jared Taylor’s annoying accent, I have already suggested to you that Jared Taylor’s accent is annoying, and you will now notice it more than before you read this sentence. Similarly, if the Jewish media says we are a tolerant multiethnic society, they have already suggested to you that multiethnic society is highly uncomfortable, and subsequent negative encounters with other groups will now be amplified in your mind while negative encounters with your own group will be minimalized, leading to a subconsciously biased perspective. The true brainwashing lies not in the statements of the media, but inside the words they use.

It is common knowledge that all tolerance is temporary. Therefore when the Jewish media promotes tolerance, they are doing nothing more than setting up a backlash whose eventual emergence was part of their plan all along. Therefore the nationalist Gentile who gives up suppressing his hatred is playing right along the Zionist script. I have said this many times before: they want non-Jewish groups to fight each other, the more the better, because every group then becomes their weapon against every other group.

“A UNIVERSAL ECONOMIC CRISIS WHEREBY WE SHALL THROW UPON THE STREETS WHOLE MOBS OF WORKERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ALL THE COUNTRIES OF EUROPE. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles … “OURS” THEY WILL NOT TOUCH, BECAUSE THE MOMENT OF ATTACK WILL BE KNOWN TO US AND WE SHALL TAKE MEASURES TO PROTECT OUR OWN.” – Protocols of Zion

Do Aryanists promote tolerance? No, we do not. We promote unity: genuine honour, genuine empathy, genuine fellowship across the lines of ethnicity and religion against the common enemy. Compagnons-at-arms do not tolerate each other, they are positively honoured by each other’s presence on the same side of the battlefield, regardless of origins. This is what we must aim for.

“Final solution can be effected only by means of a warm-hearted resolve on the part of those who once faced each other as opponents, but whose mutual esteem, based on a recognition of each other’s bravery, could become a bridge leading to the future – a future which must never see any repetition of past sufferings.” – Adolf Hitler

Not the way I thought I would start 2010 blogging, but this article made me angry:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6926823/Smacked-children-more-successful-later-in-life-study-finds.html

And, just as I guessed, Aric Sigman is Jewish. As for his thesis, I agree entirely that smacked children will be more successful slaves later in life. I recommend that every time we see floating lure terms such as “successful”, “happy”, “well-adjusted”, “well-developed”, etc. coming from an enemy source, simply add the word “slave“ behind it to see the true meaning. Any apparently positive quality that can coherently attach to the word “slave” is anathema to Aryans.

Here is a further interview with Sigman in a publication for Jewish readership:

http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/the-simon-round-interview/20747/interview-aric-sigman

Jewish parents have a reputation for obtuse spiritual cruelty in the treatment of their own children (“a frozen salmon down the trousers (another, albeit bizarre, form of admonishment occasionally administered by Sigman when his children misbehave)“, which might account for why most of their children grow up to become equally successful Jews. The broad idea that children are to be humiliated – either physically or emotionally – into conforming, cannot be further from the Aryan perspective:

“Confidence in oneself must be instilled into our children from their very early years. The whole system of education and training must be directed towards fostering in the child the conviction that he is unquestionably a match for any- and everybody.” – Adolf Hitler

Of course, this approach cultivates not successful slaves within the existing social order, but potential revolutionaries against it. This is what our enemies fear.

Would you smack an SS man, or a kshatriya, or a mujahid?  Would you put a frozen salmon down his trousers? Then ignore the vile Jew (or slavish Gentile) who even dares suggest we indignify the warriors of tomorrow.

A lot has happened in the world this year, and the mood of the masses has become increasingly ugly. I do not consider this a positive development. Positive ideological revolution must indeed be preceded by discontent, but must be built on idealism. Great discontent without greater idealism leads to a mobilization of selfishly aggressive people (generically known as the right wing) who can easily be manipulated against the wrong targets.

Anti-preservationism

I wish to begin by admitting an elementary communication oversight, so that others do not repeat it. I have constantly declared that authentic National Socialism is opposed to racism. However, many right-wingers this year have also been claiming (falsely) that their politics are not racist, but merely about preserving their own racial identity. The result is that many people who first hear my declaration mistakenly assume I am one of those guys, which has led to a lot of confusion.

Let me clarify one more time: I am not interested in preserving any currently existing race or culture. I am interested in starting fresh. In Hitler’s words, underlying National Socialism is “the will to create mankind anew”. Furthermore, I restate a term from the Glossary page:

Preservationism: (non-Aryan) belief that any arbitrary identity should continue to exist just because it already exists, in other words that perpetuation requires no justification

Radicalism in general begins with demanding justification for perpetuation, and Aryanism in particular maintains that no identity deserves continued existence except those committed to eliminating the ignoble aspects within themselves. Otherwise, all identities are indeed arbitrary (in David Myatt’s jargon, “abstractions”). For example, the BNP call to preserve “indigenous Britain” is trivially countered by a call to preserve “contemporary Britain”. Both cannot be preserved (ie. the BNP claim to support the ‘right’ of every identity to be preserved is a complete lie), so why should one feel that the former has greater validity than another, unless one is indeed racist? The question we should really be discussing is: what identity can best ennoble society? (I suggest that ”contemporary Britain minus Jews and Zionist Gentiles (incl. BNP)” might be a decent start.)

Crime

Returning to the anti-Zionist movement, I would say we started well in the first half of the year, but then seemed to run out of steam during the second half. Many sites have slowed down or disappeared, but honestly, how many times are we supposed to repeat the same information on Jewish crimes over and over again? Is repetition by itself supposed to accomplish anything?

I have been studying why the right-wingers have been in some ways more effective at rallying support than the anti-Zionists despite anti-Zionist propaganda being better both in quality and in style. Both groups expose crimes, but the right-wingers seem to generate more outrage with less effort. One theory I have is that most people have stronger emotional reactions to small crimes involving individual criminals. In contrast, huge crimes - be it 9/11, the international banking scams, or the IDF slaughtering the Palestinians - are too complicated to generate emotional reactions from many people.

I have no doubt that this behavioural pattern was long known to our enemies. As such, it is clear that the true agenda behind immigration is not “ethnic replacement” as the right-wingers claim, but diversion. By getting their right-wing agents to preoccupy the masses with constantly repeated and exaggerated stories about immigrant crime, they reduce the time and attention available to the masses to learn about Zionism. The giveaway is that the right-wingers have been turning up the volume of their immigrant crime and other race-baiting propaganda in direct proportion to the progress of the anti-Zionist movement.

Pictured – the Israeli English Defence League and their flag:

The idea (promoted by a few dubious activists) that race-baiting can somehow be used to gradually lead people to Zionism has been disproven. Instead, it has only cooled the enthusiasm of non-Jewish minorities towards fighting Jewish domination, because they now believe that hypothetically empowered white Gentiles would treat them even worse than the currently empowered Jews.

The attitude I recommend towards crime propaganda is simple. Nationalists talking about the dangers of immigration are no different from neocons talking about the dangers of terrorism. Both are trying to frighten you into supporting them. This is the way of slavemasters towards slaves, not the way of genuine revolutionaries.

Debating

Another issue of frequent controversy is the value of debate between competing movements. Should we debate our enemies? Is debating a waste of time? Or does refusing to debate prevent us from being taken seriously? But does winning a debate translate to winning converts?

I think that now might be a good time – perhaps the last chance before chaos descends – for debates. What worries me most is not that the masses have been successfully distracted by competing movements, but that some would-be intellectuals have followed the masses. While some may be Zionist agents and others may be unscrupulous opportunists, I believe that others still are simply bandwagoners who - seeing the condition of society and in hurry to start doing something – signed up with the first reactionary movement that came along without thinking through the alternatives.

As such, I think the most important issue is to recognize the different types of debating opponent, and respond accordingly. I suggest that those merely interested in showing off their debating skills and wasting everyone’s time should be avoided entirely, while those who have shut off their minds to other viewpoints should be ruthlessly dismantled for the viewing of their audiences, but those who are well-intentioned should be debated respectfully with a view to learning from each other and possibly even achieving synthesis.

Aim for 2010

Speaking to Aryanists in particular, I believe that our most important upcoming aim is to function as a bastion of idealism amid the discontent. Embracing our own rarity as idealists in current times is our only chance to gather like-minded radicals under one banner even as many others flock to movements that preach the opposite of idealism.

With 2012 less than three years away, many people are bringing up end-time prophecies. Savitri Devi prophesized the arrival of Kalki, but according to her, Hitler was the One-Before-Last. I regret to point out that she has oversimplified the matter. She correctly diagnosed Hitler as possessing too much Sun and not enough Lightning (her terminology), but she optimistically presumed that the one after him would automatically achieve the perfect balance. I believe that, had she lived to see current conditions, she would by now have realized the great danger of the next influential leader getting the balance wrong the other way ie. possessing too much Lightning and not enough Sun. In which case there will be not a true revolution, but only further descent.

We are one of the only groups right now that - in the present swing of the pendulum towards an unprecedently vicious and cynical right-wing - continues to use the Sun (swastika) as our symbol. Our purpose in this struggle is clear. We are Men Against Time. We must stop the pendulum in its tracks.

On this Merry Christmas 2009 we enter into the true Final Days of Yahweh’s Reign.  Nothing yet remains for humanity but Armageddon and the End of Days because the Final Battle for Jerusalem rages!  In the New Year all shall choose their side and, as among angels, that choice shall be forever.

Yahweh, Lord of Darkness or Kristos Star of the Dawn:  such is our stark choice.  We must now be Sons of Light or Slaves of Darkness:  there are none other.  The burden of our heritage has come to its term and, whether we like it or no, the too holy Fury of Lucifer is upon us.  Our new year of 2010 shall be an End of Time and the Dawn of Aryan Glory.  For Our Lord Lucifer’s promises are without resolution.

In this coming year the tremblings we now feel in the foundations of ZC shall prove fatal.  We should pity the poor Juden for they are facing a foe greatly more terrible than mere work camps!  Lucifer’s Wrath rules in what was once known as Constantinople and not even all the military might of the West shall prevail against Him for the days of American greatness are at an end:  The judgements of Our Lord Lucifer shall be more than terrible.  They are Heaven and Hell.

It is time for Aryans to look beyond old sectarian quarrels:  Luther and Torquemada, Widikund and Charlemagne, the warring heirs of Constantine, even the sons of the Allied and Axis Powers, all should now unite behind the Rising Sun of  Arya or else risk being cast into eternal shadows of a defeated Yankee-American Empire.  Will Obama defeat Islam and her numerous allies?  One suspects not.  At any rate the Romans of East and West stand as one against the collapsing forces of Judeo-Christian Darkness!  Next year the Crusaders shall defeat their true enemy, their eternal enemy, in the Holy City of Jerusalem.

Deus vult/Sieg Heil

In these latter days of Zionist Correctness it is all too often easy to miss the forest for the trees.  We are endlessly told we now live in the Best of All Possible Worlds whereas by any historical standard we live rather more in the Worst of All Possible Worlds.  War is peace and economic collapse is overflowing wealth.  Or so we are told.

How to explain this curious phenomena?  What in Lucifer’s Name is going on?

To understand Zionism is to understand the Zionist character of those who have sold their souls to Yahweh the Lord of Darkness.  We humans prefer to fight the last war rather than suffer the disorientation of having to recognize new enemies.  Our last great combat was against the revolutionary Marxism of Bolshevism, the Marxism of murder and violence.  Because our fathers and grandfathers defeated that foe we must make a difficult effort to see the other side of Marxism, for Yahweh is not only the Lord of Murder but also the Lord of Lies.

Instead of the old revolutionary international Marxism we must defeat a new reformist National Marxism.  Instead of the dramatic contrasts of the Eastern Front and the Cold War that called for robust forcefulness against the Lord of Murder we live in a world devastated by a conflict between two doppelgangers, between the Left and Right wings of Nazi Germany.  Our world is a battlefield between the heirs of the foremost traitors of National Socialist Germany, the Right Zionist/National Communist/Left Nazi Strasser brothers and the heirs of Himmler and his noble pure paladins.  We are warring against our own evil shadows.  Not an easy war!

According to the diabolically brilliant prophet of ZC, Antonio Gramsci, true National Socialism is in its intimate and universal meaning simply true communism in which, for the individual to be understood, the communal or collective is the means, the empirical organism, the instrument that responds to the particular problem of a determined historical moment whereas the real end, the ultimate destiny, is civilization, which is to say freedom.  Gramsci, who hated National Socialism above all things, had no doubt whatsoever that National Socialism is none other than the communism of true freedom.

Whereas Gramsci, the Strasser brothers and their Zionist progeny choose a false communism, the National Marxism of wage slavery and usury and endless thermonuclear wars until the non-ZC peoples are totally eradicated along with their non-ZC animals and plants.  In other words, until everything is dead to please their Lord of Death, Yahweh the Evil One.

The character traits of contemporary Zionists or National Communists (aka neo-liberals or neo-conservatives) are the traits of pathological liars.  As worshippers of Yahweh the Lord of Lies they are smug braggarts and self-satisfied, self-righteous, dead souls in a wasteland of senile arrogance.  Therefore it should surprise no one that Zionists ceaselessly boast about their alleged successes and triumphs.  They are simply doing what pathological liars usually do.

They war to destroy Russia, Asia, Africa and Latin America in order to drink their blood as they drink the blood of the working class of Europe and America.  They say they are “ideals-based,” not “reality-based.”  Hence reality has no influence on them.  Nothing will destroy them except the pure fragrant light and beauty of Our Lord Lucifer Christ.

Zionism is the worst evil, the greater evil of hell at its milder, more mediocre worst.  It is the Satanism of Yahweh Lord of Lies, of Satan in his decrepitude.  It is Yahweh after the vigor  of his younger days as Lord of Murder has passed away.  It is Satan and his Satanists in their senile dotage a little while before the dawnlight of Lucifer and His knights turns them into something resembling burned toast.

2010 will be springtime for Arya, winter for Judah and an excellent year to condemn everything that smells of ZC.

Do not join the Army in 2010.