When history is written by leftists

Our long-held view of WWII breaks through to mainstream academia:


Outrage as controversial taxpayer-funded black studies professor claims ‘British Empire was worse than the Nazis‘ in debate

The British Empire was branded ‘far worse than the Nazis’ during a controversial debate about Sir Winston Churchill’s legacy last night.

The wartime prime minister was also described by an academic as a ‘white supremacist‘ who benefited from Britain’s ‘heavily skewed national story’.

The online discussion – held by Churchill College, Cambridge – on ‘The Racial Consequences of Mr Churchill’ looked at his ‘backward’ views on empire and race and was held as part of a year-long ‘inclusivity’ review.

‘There is no debate. His white supremacy is pretty much on record and the question here is why does Churchill still hold the level of popularity that he does? It’s almost like he’s been beatified – a saintly figure beyond reproach.’ Professor Andrews has previously accused Britain of being ‘built on racism’ and called RAF airmen who bombed Nazi Germany war criminals.

The real question should be: why did it take mainstream academia so long to arrive at such an obvious conclusion? The simple answer is that the British Empire was Jew-friendly whereas National Socialist Germany was hostile towards Jews. But this goes beyond mere Jewish personnel infiltration of academia and subsequent conscious promotion of a Zionist-protagonist version of history. It is my contention that even among non-Jewish Westerners, hostility towards Jews is judged more negatively simply on account of Jews being known for their disproportionate contribution to every field of Western civilization:


so that hostility towards Jews is viewed (accurately!) as action slowing Western progress:


In contrast, the British Empire’s colonialism is viewed with relatively mild revulsion because its colonies were territories originally belonging to non-Western civilizations, hence colonialism is subconsciously viewed (accurately!) by Westerners as action to weaken the rivals of Western civilization, which is comforting to Westerners’ sense of security. Ultimately, Westerners judge everything by whether it advances or retards Western progress:

Professor Priya Gopal, a fellow at the college, was chairman at yesterday’s meeting.

She accused Britain of a ‘national silence’, saying the debate was ‘precisely to bring a long-overdue balance to a heavily skewed national story that has preferred untrammelled glorification to a balanced assessment in the round’. She added: ‘Historians and scholars who don’t think history should be treated as a comfort blanket or a warm bath with candles have to constantly negotiate weaponised fragility and, quite frankly, a degree of cowardice.’

Remember me saying last year that Gopal will become our ally?

The next step for mainstream academia is to realize that not only was Hitler merely “far better” than Churchill, he was the actual good guy in WWII. To reach this step, it will be necessary for mainstream academics to become anti-democratic. Since Hitler was explicitly outspoken against democracy, it will then be trivial for anti-democratic academics to see Hitler as the good guy. The fastest way to get them to recognize that they must become anti-democratic is to remind them that so long as they remain pro-democratic, they will not be taken seriously when they argue against Western superiority in other contexts, since democracy is part of Western civilization. To help this process along, I recommend spreading the following simple challenge, which I previously posted here, to anyone who claims to disbelieve in Western superiority:


A) “Western civilization is not superior to all other civilizations.”
B) “Democracy is superior to autocracy.”

PICK ONE. Because if you believe B), you logically cannot believe A).

In other words, False Leftists must either become rightists (by picking B)) or True Leftists (by picking A)).

Posted in Other | Leave a comment

A Jew complains about us


Why do people never refer to the “Y-word” in place of the offensive “yid”?

“Yid” refers to Yiddish language, which was not imposed onto Jews by anyone else, but developed by Jews themselves despite them already being fluent in German:

Yiddish – Wikipedia

a main point of difference was the use of the Hebrew alphabet for the recording of the Germanic vernacular, which may have been adopted either because of the community’s familiarity with the alphabet or to prevent the non-Jewish population from understanding the correspondence.

If you feel a need to invent a completely new tribal language to hide ingroup intentions from the outgroup, it is not offensive for the outgroup to point out that you are doing it.


Why, when the BBC recently broadcast a reading of TS Eliot’s poetry, did it read out the famously and staggeringly racist lines from “Burbank with a Baedeker” when it is inconceivable that it would regurgitate similar abuse of any other minority, even in the name of art?

Because Jews are not any other minority. Jews are practitioners of Judaism, a racist religion. Criticism of Jews is therefore anti-racism.

Yes, Judaism is categorised as a religion but there is no anti-Semite in history who viewed atheism as grounds for exemption from persecution.

Because atheist Jews are merely Jews who do not believe Yahweh exists, but who still self-identify as Jewish and are identified as Jewish by other Jews (theists as well as atheists) for tribal purposes. Even if all Jews stop believing in Yahweh’s existence, they will continue to use the tribal behaviour of the Israelites (as described in the Tanakh) as models for their own behaviour. That is the true meaning of religion. Theology is peripheral.

How, with the Holocaust still a living memory, do so many on the left feel content to dismiss the fears of one of the most persecuted peoples in history, to regard anti-Semitism as something that matters less than other prejudice, a sort of second-degree offence?

Firstly, thank you for acknowledging that the True Left is rising.

Secondly, no one has actual memories of any “Holocaust” ever occurring. That is precisely why people are imprisoned for investigating the official story:

Legality of Holocaust denial – Wikipedia

Sixteen European countries and Israel have laws against Holocaust denial,

Thirdly, Jews were historically persecuted because they were historically racist. Leftists are anti-racists. Why should leftists care that racists are persecuted? We only care that racists are not persecuted enough! I suspect you know this. Why otherwise do you call our anti-Jewishness “anti-Semitism” if not because you are worried that “anti-Jewishness” would sound too self-evidently reasonable and justified? For how is it not an anti-racist duty for all non-Jews (those who have been placed in the outgroup) to be hostile towards Jews (those who have placed themselves in the ingroup)?


Anti-Semitism is on the rise and yet political progressives, the people who ought to be allies and who normally stress the need to listen to the experience of other minorities, seem to suspend those rules when those voices are Jewish. Why is it, as writer and comedian David Baddiel asks in his short polemic, that Jews Don’t Count?

Firstly, we are True Leftists, not progressives (who are False Leftists):


Secondly, “whites” have always been a numerical minority in South Africa. Should we therefore listen to them? Should we take them seriously if they complain that Whites Don’t Count? No! Because we know the history of Apartheid. It was “whites” (Jews included) who decided to call themselves “white” and everyone else “non-white”. Thus every last one of their bloodlines must be eliminated. (Preferably starting with Elon Musk’s bloodline, though that is a separate discussion.) Similarly, we know the history of Zionism. It was Jews who decided to call themselves Jews and everyone else non-Jews. Thus every last one of their bloodlines must be eliminated. It is about history, not numbers.

Speaking of Apartheid and Zionism:

Israel–South Africa relations – Wikipedia

South Africa was among the 33 states that voted in favour of the 1947 UN Partition Plan,[1] recommending the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, and was one of only four Commonwealth nations to do so. On 24 May 1948,[2] nine days after Israel’s declaration of independence, the South African government of Jan Smuts, a long-time supporter of Zionism, granted de facto recognition to the State of Israel, just two days before his United Party was voted out of office and replaced by the pro-apartheid National Party. South Africa was the seventh nation to recognise the new Jewish state. On 14 May 1949, South Africa granted de jure recognition to the State of Israel.[3]:109–111[4] The Israeli interest in South Africa sprang in part from the presence of about 110,000 Jews in South Africa, a figure which included more than 15,000 Israeli citizens.[5]

Israel’s victory in the 1967 Six-Day War and subsequent occupation of the Sinai and West Bank alienated it diplomatically from much of the Third World and African states. Black nationalist movements then began to see it as a colonial state.[21] At the same time, in South Africa, Israel became the object of widespread admiration, particularly among the country’s political and military leadership. The editorial of Die Burger, then the mouthpiece of the South African Nationalist Party, declared: “Israel and South Africa are engaged in a struggle for existence… The anti-Western powers have driven Israel and South Africa into a community of interests which had better be utilized than denied.”[15]

Within less than a decade, South Africa would be one of Israel’s closest military and economic allies, whilst Israel would occupy the position of South Africa’s closest military ally, and Israel had become the most important foreign arms supplier to the South African Defence Force[3]:117–19

By 1973, an economic and military alliance between Israel and South Africa was in the ascendancy. The military leadership of both countries was convinced that both nations faced a fundamentally similar predicament, fighting for their survival against the common enemy of the PLO and the ANC.[31]

Israeli and South African intelligence chiefs held regular conferences with each other to share information on enemy weapons and training.[34] The co-ordination between the Israel Defense Forces and the South African Defense Force was unprecedented, with Israeli and South African generals giving each other unfettered access to each other’s battlefields and military tactics, and Israel sharing with South Africa highly classified information about its missions, such as Operation Opera, which had previously only been reserved for the United States.[35]

The South African government’s yearbook of 1978 wrote: “Israel and South Africa have one thing above all else in common: they are both situated in a predominantly hostile world inhabited by dark peoples.”[36]

Israel was one of the most important allies in South Africa’s weapons procurement during the years of PW Botha’s regime.[41]

By 1980, a sizeable contingent of South African military and government officials were living permanently in Israel, to oversee the numerous joint projects between the countries, while their children attended local Israeli schools.[42] Scientific collaboration also continued to increase, with many scientists working in each other’s countries. Perhaps most sensitive was the large group of Israeli scientists working at South Africa’s Pelindaba nuclear facility.[42]

During Operation Protea in 1981, the South African Defence Force made military history, as arguably the first user of modern drone technology, when it operated the Israeli IAI Scout drones in combat in Angola. They would only be used in combat by the Israel Defense Forces a year later during the 1982 Lebanon War and Operation Mole Cricket 19.[43]

South Africa provided much of the yellowcake uranium that Israel required to develop its nuclear weapons. South Africa built its own nuclear bombs, possibly with Israeli assistance.[57] Some Resolutions of the UN General Assembly in the early 1980s which condemned the cooperation between Israel and Apartheid South Africa, also mentioned nuclear collaboration.[58] U.S. Intelligence believed that Israel participated in South African nuclear research projects and supplied advanced non-nuclear weapons technology to South Africa during the 1970s, while South Africa was developing its own atomic bombs.[59][60] According to David Albright, “Faced with sanctions, South Africa began to organize clandestine procurement networks in Europe and the United States, and it began a long, secret collaboration with Israel.” He goes on to say “A common question is whether Israel provided South Africa with weapons design assistance, although available evidence argues against significant cooperation.”[61]

Chris McGreal has written that “Israel provided expertise and technology that was central to South Africa’s development of its nuclear bombs”.[25] In 2000, Dieter Gerhardt, Soviet spy and former commander in the South African Navy, stated that Israel agreed in 1974 to arm eight Jericho II missiles with “special warheads” for South Africa.[62]

According to journalist Seymour Hersh, the 1979 Vela incident, was the third joint Israeli-South African nuclear weapons test in the Indian Ocean, and the Israelis had sent two IDF ships and “a contingent of Israeli military men and nuclear experts” for the test.[63]


The author’s question is less about why anti-Semitism exists than why good people care less about it.

That’s what makes us good people. Good people hate racists. Jews are racists by definition. Therefore good people hate Jews.

The key is that Jews are not seen as underprivileged or marginalised. They are caricatured as rich capitalists. They are also “too white” for campaigners. This means they are beyond the interest of social justice activists who see racism as a class construct, one in which you need to be economically or socially disadvantaged.

It is true that Jews are “white” (not just by Apartheid South African standards either; look at their role as colonialists worldwide in colonial-era history!) and rich. It is untrue that social justice activists only care about racism against economically or socially disadvantaged groups. If we did, we would ignore racism against, for example, Chinese (with China well on the way to becoming – if not already – the leading economic power in the world). We do not. Because we know the history of China’s colonization by the Western colonial powers. We know the history of the Opium Wars. Speaking of which:

David Sassoon – Wikipedia

When the Treaty of Nanking opened up China to British traders, Sassoon developed his textile operations into a profitable triangular trade: Indian yarn and opium were carried to China, where he bought goods which were sold in Britain, from where he obtained Lancashirecotton products. He sent his son Elias David Sassoon to Canton, where he was the first Jewish trader (with 24 Parsi rivals). In 1845, David Sassoon & Co. opened an office in what would soon become Shanghai’s British concession, and it became the firm’s second hub of operations.

In 1844, he set up a branch in Hong Kong, and a year later, he set up his Shanghai branch on The Bund to cash in on the opium trade.

David Sassoon, as an Orthodox Jew, continued his Jewish religious observances, observing the Jewish Sabbath throughout his busy life.


Wrapped into this, of course, is anger at Israel, a poster cause for the left. But on this Baddiel, no supporter of Israel, has a simple riposte. The issue of Palestine offers no justification for anti-Semitism in Britain

Absolutely it does! Without British Jews, there would have been no Balfour Delcaration:

Balfour Declaration – Wikipedia

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government in 1917 during the First World War announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.

In other words, greater hostility towards British Jews a century ago could have prevented the existence of Israel. That ship has unfortunately sailed, but perhaps greater hostility towards British Jews from now on can contribute to ending the existence of Israel.


The one worry is that this will be read mainly by Jews and not by those who need to read it. It should be essential reading for progressives, self-proclaimed anti-racists, and those offering diversity and awareness courses. If it is, then Baddiel will have done a sterling service.

This self-proclaimed anti-racist has read it and rebutted it. Baddiel’s service is to offer yet another demonstration of Jewish intellectual dishonesty.

(P.S. Please contrast the above easily explained moral reasoning based on readily verifiable historical information, the approach that characterizes True Left anti-Zionism, with the approach of such clowns as Marjorie Taylor Greene that characterizes rightist anti-Semitism (which really is hostile to non-Jewish Semites (e.g. Rashida Tlaib) also). Under no circumstances should newcomers be tempted by False Left propaganda to assume that Greene’s batshit lunacy discredits all forms of hostility towards Jews.)

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

Kristallnacht tribute

On the old forum I had posted a set of pictures of synagogue architecture. Originally I planned to simply repost them in this topic:


but I then thought they would be better off posted here. By noting the similarities with what Westerners in general (see above link) considered beautiful during the height of the colonial era, there should be no dispute that Jews (who by no coincidence were among the most notable colonialists) are aesthetically Westerners, and hence, in aesthetics no less than in ethics:


because it goes without saying that we find this style of architecture utterly vampiric, and collectively a perfectly accurate portrayal of the personality of Yahweh (a.k.a. the Devil/Demiurge, creator of the material world) whom these synagogues were built to worship:

After looking at all that, hopefully you can now better appreciate how aesthetically cathartic Kristallnacht actually was:

Kristallnacht – Wikipedia

The rioters destroyed 267 synagogues throughout Germany, Austria, and the Sudetenland.[6] Over 1,400 synagogues and prayer rooms,[39] many Jewish cemeteries, more than 7,000 Jewish shops, and 29 department stores were damaged, and in many cases destroyed.

It did not take long before the first heavy grey stones came tumbling down, and the children of the village amused themselves as they flung stones into the many colored windows. When the first rays of a cold and pale November sun penetrated the heavy dark clouds, the little synagogue was but a heap of stone, broken glass and smashed-up woodwork.[41]

After this, the Jewish community was fined 1 billion Reichsmarks (equivalent to 4 billion 2017 € or 7 billion in 2020 USD).

Notice how peaceful and relaxed the rubble feels compared to the synagogues:

In an article released for publication on the evening of 11 November, Goebbels ascribed the events of Kristallnacht to the “healthy instincts” of the German people.

Of course, Western colonialists disagreed:

Former German Kaiser Wilhelm II commented “For the first time, I am ashamed to be German.”[46]

What do you think?

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

Thank you for remembering us, Duginists


Investigation after ‘Nazi monkey’ appears in Russian circus

The show also featured goats wrapped in Nazi flags with swastikas, according to the Russian news website Znak.

The performance was part of a show at the Udmurtia Circus in the city of Izhevsk on 8 January.

It was commissioned by the Russian Orthodox Church, which said the show symbolised the “spurning” of Nazism.

Russian law forbids public displays of Nazi symbols.

The Orthodox Church, meanwhile, has defended the performance. It said the show was intended to be “a symbol of not just the victory over fascism, but also of the spurning and the global condemnation of the ideals of Nazi Germany”.

The Church insists it is covered by an exemption signed by President Vladimir Putin in March 2020. The exemption allows the display of Nazi symbols providing they “create a negative attitude to Nazi ideology”.

The monkey and the goats were commanded by trainers wearing Soviet uniforms during the show, Church officials said.

Religious believers were persecuted in the former USSR, but now Orthodoxy and the veneration of the Soviet victory against Nazi Germany form two of the most important pillars of Russian state ideology.

Circus shows involving animals are still legal in Russia.

And this is why the Orthodox Church must be destroyed.

For the record, authentic National Socialists do not find the above show in any way insulting, as we do not consider monkeys and goats to be inferior (quite the contrary). In putting on such a show, the Orthodox expose firstly their own anthropocentrism and humanism (both of which come straight from the Tanakh), and hence confirm their own inferiority by Aryan standards.

Secondly they expose that they still – accurately – consider us a threat to them. As they rally Turandom, they remain aware of the uncompromising anti-Turanist force that we have always represented.

While Operation Barbarossa was ultimately a failure in terms of territorial acquisition, in terms of personnel attrition it was a considerable success. Imagine how much more Turanian blood there might be in the world today if Operation Barbarossa had not occurred and hence all those who had died were instead left alive to reproduce!

Hunger Plan – Wikipedia

The plan as a means of mass murder was outlined in several documents, including one that became known as Göring’s Green Folder, which quoted a number of “20 to 30 million” expected Russian deaths from “military actions and crises of food supply”.

The Hunger Plan caused the deaths of millions of citizens in the German-occupied territories of the Soviet Union.[10] The historian Timothy Snyder estimates that “4.2 million Soviet citizens (largely Russians, Belarusians, and Ukrainians) [were] starved by the German occupiers in 1941–1944″.[11] Among the victims were many Jews, whom the Nazis forced into ghettos and Soviet prisoners of war, whose movement was most easily controlled by the Germans and thus easily cut off from food supplies.[1] Jews were prohibited from purchasing eggs, butter, milk, meat or fruit.[12]

The most reliable figures for the death rate among Soviet prisoners of war in German captivity reveal that 3.3 million died from a total of 5.7 million captured between June 1941 and February 1945, most directly or indirectly as a result of starvation.[14] Of these 3.3 million, 2 million had already died by the beginning of February 1942.[15] The enormous number of deaths was the result of a deliberate policy of starvation directed against Soviet POWs.

Effect of siege on Leningrad – Wikipedia

1.2 million civilians perished in Leningrad but around 1.4 million people were rescued by military evacuation between September 1941 and November 1943. After the war, the Soviet government reported about 670,000 registered deaths from 1941 to January 1944, explained as resulting mostly from starvation, stress and exposure.[citation needed]

Some independent studies suggest a much higher death toll of between 700,000 and 1.5 million, with most estimates putting civilian losses at around 1.1 to 1.3 million.

The total number of human losses during the 29 months of the siege of Leningrad is estimated as 1.5 million, both civilian and military.[14] Only 700,000 people were left alive of a 3.5 million pre-war population.

Hitler’s directive No. 1601 ordered that “St. Petersburg must be erased from the face of the Earth” and “we have no interest in saving lives of the civilian population.”[7]

By demographic measures, WWII was a victory for anti-Turanism. And the Orthodox Church knows it.

If you are an anti-Duginist, please join us here:


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

Anti-Zionist harvest: beauty pageant edition


The runner-up in this year’s Miss France beauty contest said it was disheartening to see that “we are still here in 2020” in response to a barrage of anti-Semitic abuse she received online after mentioning that her father was Israeli.

Paris prosecutors on Monday said they had opened an inquiry into “racist insults and provoking racial hatred” against April Benayoum, 21, who is reigning Miss Provence and came second in the national pageant on Saturday night.

The offence of publishing anti-Semitic remarks carries a maximum penalty of one year in prison and a €45,000 (£41,000) fine.

Among the 40,000 tweets citing Miss Provence and Israel on Saturday night, one read “Hitler forgot about this one” and another “Don’t vote for a Jew”. The slurs marred an event watched by more than eight million people on TF1, France’s biggest TV channel.

Our message continues to spread:


Also, since this is a beauty pageant, let’s note how ugly Benayoum is:

During the contest, she told judges that her mother was Serbo-Croat and her father was Israeli-Italian, leading to a barrage of abuse on Twitter.

We should encourage insults towards her maternal bloodline also:


Anti-Zionism can and should be integrated into broader anti-Turanism.

Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 1 Comment

Our enemies compare Soros to Hitler now

In the old days, it was only rightists who were compared to Hitler by leftists. Now leftists are compared to Hitler by rightists. This is how much we have changed the perception of Hitler:


“Europe is George Soros’ gas chamber,” Szilard Demeter, ministerial commissioner and head of the Petofi Literary Museum in Budapest, wrote in an opinion Saturday in the pro-government Origo media outlet. “Poison gas flows from the capsule of a multicultural open society, which is deadly to the European way of life.”

And no, I have never received any money from Soros, contrary to unfounded allegations by some rightists.

In the article, Demeter, who was appointed by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to oversee cultural production, compared Soros to Hitler, writing he was “the liberal Führer, and his liber-Aryan army deifies him more than did Hitler’s own.”

Here we also have a rare mainstream occasion when “Aryan” is used as a slur against leftists! This would have been considered almost unthinkable a decade ago, but it has arrived as I promised it would. Now all we need to do is embrace it, and the term will be reclaimed as has been our objective from the outset.

The article also noted the conflict over the European Union’s next budget, which Hungary and Poland are holding up over provisions that could block payments to countries that do not uphold democratic standards. Demeter referred to the two countries, both of which are under EU investigation for undermining judicial independence and media freedom, as “the new Jews.”

Truer words have never been spoken!

See also:


By the way, the content on the main site is under reconstruction for greater relevance to the 2020s (and beyond). Until reconstruction is complete, please join us here:


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 7 Comments


The True Left sets the pace of leftist politics, the mainstream follows, and the False Left is left in the dust. This month we have reached a new milestone:


We are writing to ask you to reconsider the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a partner in social justice work.

Many organizations in our communities find themselves in spaces with the ADL, using its anti-bias education materials, or counting on the ADL to support our political goals. In light of a growing understanding of the ADL’s harmful practices, many progressive groups are rethinking those relationships.

Even though the ADL is integrated into community work on a range of issues, it has a history and ongoing pattern of attacking social justice movements led by communities of color, queer people, immigrants, Muslims, Arabs, and other marginalized groups, while aligning itself with police, right-wing leaders, and perpetrators of state violence. More disturbing, it has often conducted those attacks under the banner of “civil rights.” This largely unpublicized history has come increasingly to light as activists work to make sense of the ADL’s role in condemning the Movement for Black Lives, Palestinian rights organizing, and Congressional Representative Ilhan Omar, among others.

We are deeply concerned that the ADL’s credibility in some social justice movements and communities is precisely what allows it to undermine the rights of marginalized communities, shielding it from criticism and accountability while boosting its legitimacy and resources. Even when it may seem that our work is benefiting from access to some resources or participation from the ADL, given the destructive role that it too often plays in undermining struggles for justice, we believe that we cannot collaborate with the ADL without betraying our movements.


To our beloved community:
The ADL is not an ally.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has branded itself as a civil rights organization in ways that conceal and legitimize its right-wing activities undermining the rights of Black, immigrant, queer, Muslim, Arab, and other marginalized communities.

Many progressive individuals and organizations partner with the ADL not knowing its ongoing legacy of supporting racist policing, surveillance, colonialism, and the silencing of social justice activism. Misinformation about the ADL’s work, and its credibility in progressive circles, are what allow the ADL to continue harming social justice movements.

The following primer was compiled by organizations across the US working in coalition for freedom, justice, and equality. We hope it can be helpful in strengthening all of our social justice movements in resisting repression and advancing a vision of liberation for all. Many conflicts between the ADL and our movements are not covered in this primer. Community efforts to resist the ADL are also not covered here. For additional information and updates, visit DropTheADL.org.

I especially like this section:

The ADL blacklists organizations criticizing Israel’s separate and unequal system, particularly those linking oppression in the US and Palestine. It targets Black, Muslim, and Arab organizers as anti-Semites, suggesting that their links to anti-racist, anti-colonial movements (which have long challenged Israel) are links to “hate.” It also specifically smears Jewish organizers who contest the ADL’s claim to represent Jewish interests and safety.  In smearing activists, the ADL calls “anti-Semitic” any discussion of the influence of Zionist institutions in US politics; of links between US political donors and Israel’s lucrative military and tech sectors; and of the well-documented sympathies between US and Israeli racial supremacist forces.

The ADL is correct about one thing, however: anti-racism is hate, and proudly so. How can you be anti-racist without hating racism?

On the other hand, while it goes without saying that we support excluding the ADL, we should also beware of who has already infiltrated the #DropTheADL movement:

The ADL’s abuse of the term anti-Semitism not only muzzles legitimate criticism of injustices perpetrated by Israel, but it communicates a dangerous message that all Jews share the same views — a central tenet of traditional anti-Semitism — and implies that there is something Jewish about military occupation (and by extension, that boycotting occupation is boycotting Jews). Furthermore, it detracts from naming and fighting the very real and present acts of anti-Semitism.

The moment I read this paragraph, I knew that Jews have infiltrated and are doing controlled dissent. They know that calling criticism of Israel “anti-Semitism” doesn’t work anymore, so they are trying to salvage “anti-Semitism” for other applications in Jewish interests by themselves joining in the dissent (which we started) and then shamelessly claiming that there does exist, separate from criticism of Israel, some form of ‘real’ “anti-Semitism” which non-Jews are supposed to defend Jews against. (There does not. The moment Jews decided that they were Jews and the rest of us were non-Jews, non-Jews ceased to have any moral duty to defend Jews from anything; on the contrary, we acquired a moral duty to attack them until all their bloodlines have ceased to exist. This is true anti-racism.)

And here is what I found at the bottom of the page ( no surprises!):

This primer was put together by the Drop The ADL Working Group with contributions from the following organizations:

American Friends Service Committee, American Muslims for Palestine, Arab Resource and Organizing Center, #DropTheADL, Friends of Sabeel – North America, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network, Jewish Voice for Peace Deadly Exchange Campaign, Jews Against Anti-Muslim Racism, Network Against Islamophobia, Palestine Legal, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid, St. Louis Jewish Voice for Peace, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, US Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.

Therefore support the movement to exclude the ADL, but do not trust the DropTheADL site. And next we must go after the groups marked in bold. There is no such thing as a “Jewish Anti-Zionist Network” (such a network would first stop being Jewish), a “Jewish Voice for Peace” (such a voice would first stop being Jewish), or “Jews Against Anti-Muslim Racism” (such individuals would first stop being Jews, and also would not misleadingly describe racism as anti-outgroup, but would have no problem with accurately describing racism as being pro-ingroup (and hence admit all Jews* are racists)).

(* An individual born to Jewish parents, who renounces Judaism and voluntarily refrains from reproducing, is not a Jew.)

What we really need is #DropJewishness. But I understand the need to do things in a sensible sequence. So first let’s #DropNukesOnIsrael.


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 17 Comments

Anti-Zionist harvest: Ivy League edition


In 2010, Penn was just under 20 percent Jewish, according to data collected by the Steinhardt Social Research Institute. By 2016, only 13 percent of the campus identified as Jewish by religion, a decrease of over 600 Jewish students. (When including students who claimed only ethnic or cultural affiliation, those numbers jump three percentage points.) And Penn is far from the only Ivy League campus to note a decline. To take another example, throughout the 2000s, about 20 percent of incoming freshmen at Yale University identified as Jewish, according to data collected by the Yale University Chaplain’s Office. In the 2010s, that number was closer to 16 percent. For the past three years, The Harvard Crimson has reported that about 10 percent of incoming first-year students identified as Jewish, according to their own survey. For the incoming Harvard class of 2020, that number has dropped to 6 percent.

Attention to declining Jewish numbers is not new: In 1999, The New York Times noted that the Jewish presence at Princeton University had fallen to 10 percent in the past decade, from a high of over 18 percent in the early 1980s, and warned that these “figures closely track a nationwide pattern; the percentage of college students who identify themselves as Jews has declined steadily over the last two decades.”

while 13% of campus identified as Jewish when asked about religion, the same criteria used for the 2010 numbers, an additional 3% identified as having no religion but indicated they were Jewish “aside from religion,”

In other words, Jews admit that Jewishness is not just about religion. But non-Jews who point out the same thing are “anti-Semites” (even those who themselves are Semites).

Then there is plain demography. The applicant pool at elite schools has broadened and become more diverse, including not just more Americans but international students, too. It may not be that fewer Jews apply to Ivy League schools, or are less likely to identify as Jewish, or are even less-worthy candidates, but simply that, as Penn’s Uram puts it, “It’s really hard to get into college today.”

In the same years that Penn went from being 20 percent Jewish to 13 percent Jewish, the overall population of white students—a category that would include most, though certainly not all, Jews—at Penn declined from 64 percent to 44 percent. That’s pretty huge.

Asian-Americans, the new subjects of admission controversies, have sued Harvard, explicitly fighting what they see as unofficial quotas that artificially limit their numbers. If they win their current court case, the number of Jewish students could decrease further.

In other words, the increased competition for spots at Ivies has resulted in fewer Jewish students, but has also opened these institutions up for other groups. There is no reason to think that Jewish students feel any less pressure to get accepted to top schools than their parents—but these schools are harder to get into than they were for their parents.

And as Orthodox students know, if the community falls below a certain threshold, it can be hard to build up again.

And that is how mindblowingly simple our strategy of demographic replacement is.


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 7 Comments

Jewish racism vs anti-Jewish anti-racism


Like anti-Black racism, anti-Jewish racism cannot have a place in any legitimate anti-racist liberation movement, yet unfortunately, like with anti-Black racism, those who spout anti-Jewish ideas refuse to acknowledge their prejudice, instead qualifying their hateful words with claims to good intentions.

There is no such thing as “anti-black racism”. Racism is always pro-ingroup, never anti-outgroup. I have never encountered a racist who is genuinely “anti-black”. Even William Pierce, who in The Turner Diaries advocates killing all “black” people in the world:


is not “anti-black”, because he advocates such killing as a way to benefit “whites”. Ask Pierce if he is willing for all “whites” to die as the price for all “blacks” dying simultaneously, and he is certain to refuse such a deal. Pierce measures everything according to its benefit to “whites”. He is thus pro-”white”, not “anti-black”. This – being pro-ingroup – is what it means to be racist.

However, Jews want us to believe there is such an oxymoronic thing as “anti-black racism” in order to cloud the meaning of racism. Because Jews themselves measure everything according to its benefit to Jews. Jews are thus racist: they are pro-Jewish. But they do not want us to notice this, hence are trying to disorient anti-racists into thinking instead about being pro-”black” (note their use of the deliberately long-winded term “anti-racist liberation movement”, which, in conjunction with the other deliberately long-winded term “anti-black racism”, subtly conditions the reader to erroneously presume anti-racism is about “liberation”, implicitly of “blacks”).

Genuine anti-racism, however, must be the structural opposite of racism. Given that racism (as defined above) is about being pro-ingroup, anti-racism must be about being anti-ingroup. Therefore it is not “black” “liberation” that anti-racists care about. Anti-racists only care about exterminating racists. There is no “anti-racist liberation movement”. There is simply an anti-racist movement – a movement against racists.

And those racists include Jews. So there is certainly no “anti-Jewish racism”. There is only anti-Jewish anti-racism. (Similarly there is no “anti-white racism” either, but only “anti-white anti-racism”.)

When Black celebrities claim that their anti-Semitism is actually a “pro-Black” stance, they assert that the only possible form of liberation for Black people is through creating our own “Other.”

Whichever celebrities made such a claim, we disavow them. If their anti-Jewishness has a pro-”black” motive, I guarantee that they will also be willing to become pro-Jewish as soon as they are shown that being pro-Jewish can be a more efficient way to be pro-”black”. (Indeed, some already have so turned within a matter of weeks since their initial outbursts against Jewry.) The only celebrities (or ordinary people too) who will be able to remain steadfastly anti-Jewish are those whose anti-Jewishness was never motivated by pro-”black” intentions, but only ever by authentic hatred towards racists, including Jews.

There is a huge difference between critiquing whiteness—a racist fabrication with undeniable social consequences—and denigrating Jewishness.

Not really. Jewishness is also a racist fabrication (a tribe marking its own ingroup), and with a much longer history of undeniable social consequences.

Anti-Black racism (as well as anti-Arab racism) as practiced by Jewish institutions and individuals ought to be critiqued where observed, but on the basis of white assimilation and imperialism, not on the basis of Jewish identity.

But Jewish institutions do not in fact practice “anti-black racism” or “anti-Arab racism”. They practice pro-Jewish racism (which includes favouritism for Jewish “whites” over non-Jewish “whites”, disproving that racism by Jews is merely ordinary “white” racism). Why, then, should they not be critiqued on the basis of Jewish identity?

Which is not to say, on the other hand, that Eurocentrism is not a significant aspect of Jewish identity. Pro-Jewish racism will certainly prefer Jews over non-Jews when both are perceived as similarly “white”, but at the same time is likely to prefer “white” non-Jews over even  Jews (or those who claim Jewishness) if the latter are perceived as “non-white”:


the Igbo Jewish community is not recognized by the Israel’s Supreme Court or by any other Jewish religious group. Indeed, while they identify themselves as part of the worldwide Jewish community, they are still struggling to be recognized by other Jews.[17] Indeed, Igbo Jews asserts that they are connected to Judaism via their Jewish blood as they claim to be descendants of the ancient Israelites.[16] In S. Afsai article, an affiliate of the Gihon Hebrews’ Synagogue declares:[17] “We say we are Jews from blood. We are now excluded; we cannot go and participate as Jews in any place. I make an appeal that we be recognized, not excluded and isolated from other Jews.”


Some Jewish Israelis of European descent, known also as Ashkenazi Jews, have been described as viewing themselves as superior to non-Ashkenazi Jews. They are accused of maintaining an elite position in Israeli society,[150][151] with some describing the attitudes of Ashkenazim as racist or of being a manifestation of racism.[152]

Israeli society in general – and Ashkenazi Jews in particular – have been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent, known as Mizrahi Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Oriental Jews.[162] A variety of Mizrahi critics of Israeli policy have cited “past ill-treatment, including the maabarot, the squalid tent cities into which Mizrahim were placed upon arrival in Israel; the humiliation of Moroccan and other Mizrahi Jews when Israeli immigration authorities shaved their heads and sprayed their bodies with the pesticide DDT

In the 1950s, 1,033[179] children of Yemenite immigrant families disappeared. In most instances, the parents claim that they were told their children were ill and required hospitalization. Upon later visiting the hospital, it is claimed that the parents were told that their children had died though no bodies were presented or graves which have later proven to be empty in many cases were shown to the parents. Those who believe the theory contend that the Israeli government as well as other organizations in Israel kidnapped the children and gave them for adoption. Secular Israeli Jews of European descent were accused of collaborating in the disappearance of babies of Yemeni Jews and anti-religious motives and anti-religious coercion were alleged.[180][181][182][183][184][185][186] Some went further to accuse the Israeli authorities of conspiring to kidnap the Yemeni children due to “racist” motives.[187]

there have been a series of reports in the Israeli press about alleged acts of police brutality against Ethiopian Israelis, with many in the community saying they are unfairly targeted and treated more harshly than other citizens

This is especially the case in the sphere of reproduction, when Jews frequently reproduce with “white” non-Jews with the offspring accepted as Jews and without systematic worry about polluting the Jewish gene pool, yet when it comes to “non-whites” (even if Jewish), all hell breaks loose:

In 1962, authorities in Israel were accused by articles in the Indian press of racism in relation to Jews of Indian ancestry (called Bene Israel).[188][189] In the case that caused the controversy, the Chief Rabbi of Israel ruled that before registering a marriage between Indian Jews and Jews not belonging to that community, the registering rabbi should investigate the lineage of the Indian applicant for possible non-Jewish descent

In 2010, Israel was accused of a “sterilization policy” aimed towards Ethiopian Jews, for allowing the prescription of contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera to the community.[202][203] They stated that the Israeli government deliberately gives female Ethiopian Jews long-lasting contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera.[202]

Israel initially denied the claim of imposing a sterilization policy on the Ethiopian women,[202] but later admitted to it … 35 Ethiopian women who had immigrated to Israel said they had been told they would not be allowed into Israel unless they agreed to the shots.

So basically in Jewish eyes: “white” Jews > “white” non-Jews >> “non-white” Jews > “non-white” non-Jews.

To be truly anti-Jewish must include rejecting Eurocentrism. This is why only leftists can be truly anti-Jewish, though admittedly even among leftists many have yet to clear the poison inside their own minds. If you need help with this, or want to help others with this, please join us here:


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 22 Comments

Anti-Zionist harvest: Holland

Operation Gaddafi continues to yield steady results. Our enemies report:


Anti-Semitism on Dutch websites is beginning to spill out, reports the anti-Semitism watchdog CIDI today with the release of a new report on Internet anti-Semitism. The websites with the most anti-Semitic utterances are Dutchturks.nl and Morokko.nl, as the group discovered in collaboration with the investigative bureau, Kantar.

On as many as 286 Dutch websites anti-Semitic utterances are found, which vary from remarks that the September 11 attacks were allegedly carried out by Zionists, to Frans Timmerman being a puppet of the Jews, to the “Jewish lobby”, which is allegedly behind all kinds of sinister developments. Anti-Semitism is also rampant on Twitter and CIDI, and Kantar found some 750 tweets in which Jews were attacked because of their origin.

Remarkably enough, the websites that stand out as to the extent of anti-Semitism are often aimed at Dutch people with a migration background. On the Internet pages that have a lot of “incidental anti-Semitism”, Dutchturks.nl tops the list. Aside from some consumer websites, Hababam.nl can also be found in the top ten— this site calls itself the “virtual house of Turkey”.

On the other hand, “structural anti-Semitism” is practiced on web pages of Moroccan-Dutch origin. Maroc.nl (“the oldest online forum for Moroccans in the Netherlands and Flanders”) contained no fewer than 85 anti-Semitic utterances, followed by forums.marokko (“‘the largest Moroccan web community in the world”) where Jew hatred showed up 53 times.

See also:


Posted in Aryan Sanctuary | 2 Comments