I look at Geert Wilders’ recent publicity round and see a missed opportunity for the anti-Zionist community worldwide. Had we been coordinated, we could have all spent this week – when online searches on Wilders would spike – concertedly flooding as much of the online media as possible with information about Wilders’ Jewish ancestry (it has been confirmed that his maternal grandmother Johanna Ording-Meijer is an Indonesian Jew, which makes him fully Jewish by Jewish geneaological standards) and social connections with Israel as well as other Zionists and crypto-Zionists masquerading as far-right reactionaries. In this way, we could have turned the enemy-generated publicity back against the enemy by making their audience ours also.
But instead, we will have a few of us mentioning Wilders, a few of us talking about swine flu ‘vaccines’, a few of us talking about the economy, a few of us talking about Iran, a few of us talking about self-defense preparations, a few of us still talking about 9/11 or the ‘Holocaust’, a few of us complaining about other anti-Zionists just because they ask for donations, etc.. In short, the same as any other week.
Similar opportunities occur, and are wasted, on a regular basis. Every time the mainstream media builds something up – be it the assassination of Michael Jackson or the Lisbon Treaty – is our chance to converge upon it under one banner, a chance which we almost always miss.
It’s not that we lack the numbers. It’s that when everyone follows their own schedule and their own pace, it is not an anti-Zionist movement, it is an anti-Zionist diffusion. Marching in step does not mean we would somehow cover less information in total, as long as we spend the same amount of time doing the same amount of work. What it does mean is that our presence will be felt. Instead of tiny, disorganized pellets bouncing randomly off targets in all directions, we could be releasing a shotgun blast of counterpropaganda into public awareness focused on a different target every week or every month.
As mentioned before, it is not just about information any more. It is about holding people’s attention and emotions on the correct issues. Right now, it is about preventing our enemies from agitating aggression and encouraging hostility against scapegoats (in Wilders’ case, turning non-Muslims against Muslims). Trying to get us fighting each other over race and religion, and in the process giving power to their agents who offer to lead us in this capacity, has always been part of their plan: