I must have read through more than 10000 comments all over the web this week on the topic of Israeli piracy. The most significant observation is the change in tone of the pro-Israeli crowd, who as we must remember are a mix of: a) paid Israeli cyber-soldiers; b) international Jewish sayanim; c) ZC Gentiles (nationalists, neocons, sundry Islamophobes, etc.). Of course we still find the usual moral inversions (e.g. trying to give Israel positive credit for not killing anyone in its second hijacking, as if killing victims was Israel’s Yahweh-given privilege (according to the Tanakh and Talmud, it is!), and never mind the crime of the hijacking itself), but we also find a lot more aggression, such as boasts about Israeli military/political potency, threats of annihilating Muslims and even prophecies of divine intercession in Israel’s favour due to their ‘Chosenness’. This mirrors the insolent attitude of the Israeli government itself over this entire incident.

Two psychological processes are at work here. Gentiles who praise Israel for “having balls” are vicariously living out their own fantasies via Jewish actions, no different than fans of snuff porn. Jews who posture Zionist power, on the other hand, are behaving like a cornered reptilian that puffs itself up to intimidate its opponent because it knows it cannot win an actual fight. One of the most prominent memes spawned over the past few days, repeated by both Jews and Gentiles, is “Don’t bring a pipe to a gunfight.” The underlying sentiment is clear: overt celebration of force, without regard for justification.

The Aryan response is simple: don’t pull a gun on a pipe-wielder and then complain that you can’t parry. In other words, now that Jews show signs of dropping their age-old victim act, we must NEVER allow them to pick it back up.

Some years ago, Robert Faurisson speculated: “So the wandering Jew is about to hit the road again. In nearly every place he has sojourned, his conduct has aroused the revolt of the host population, which has finally ordered him to choose between the suitcase and the coffin. In today’s Israel, he will soon have need to pack his suitcase. He will make his way back to the rich lands that have been brainwashed by his holocaustic propaganda. Bewailing a second “Holocaust” and a third Destruction of the Temple will suffice: then he’ll demand new reparations, new privileges.”

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n6p52_Faurisson.html

It is our duty to lay the groundwork in collective consciousness so as to prevent such a scenario from coming to pass. When Israel falls, there must be no amnesty for the former Israeli settlers, nor refuge for their enablers from the Jewish diaspora. They will have to face those whom they once oppressed, and be judged by them.

A litmus test of whether the popular condemnation of Israeli piracy in Europe is just an unfocused feel-good protest or whether it has genuine power are the upcoming elections in the Netherlands, where previous polls have predicted that Geert Wilders (Jew) will enter government. Unless the results show a sudden decrease in support for Wilders, I will have to conclude that the effort to refine anti-Israel feelings into Christian-Mohammedan unity has not yet shown success.

Here is a concise video primer on Wilders for beginners (veterans please ignore the photos of ‘anti-Zionist Jews’ “For that part of Jewry which was styled Liberal did not disown the Zionists as if they were not members of their race but rather as brother Jews who publicly professed their faith in an unpractical way, so as to create a danger for Jewry itself. Thus there was no real rift in their internal solidarity.” - Adolf Hitler):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy2LTd7S-fY

And here is a repost of an old favourite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0LcchcbXSM

Some of our enemies are actually bringing up the Armenian massacre in an attempt to promote hostility towards Turkey. As the video above reminds us, do not forget to expose the Armenian massacre as a Jewish operation.

“One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew “The Great Master of Lies”. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.” - Adolf Hitler

Some further advice to the counterpropaganda effort: do not just attack the STATEMENTS of Jews, attack their WORDS. Until all of us are doing this all the time, our efforts are achieving only a fraction of their potential impact.

As I have explained in depth previously, Jewish lies are embedded in the vocabulary which they use and which they want us to use even when arguing against them. This vocabulary is designed so as to implant assumptions that make their statements appear more valid and themselves appear more powerful.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100602/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians

Consider the following quote:

Israel dropped plans Wednesday to prosecute dozens of pro-Palestinian activists, opting instead to deport them all immediately.

Almost every operative term in this sentence is being used in this way.

‘Prosecute’ implies that a crime was committed by the flotilla team (FALSE!) ie. a crime is committed whenever Jews say a crime is committed ie. you are a Goy, Jews are your slavemasters.

‘Deport’ implies that the flotilla team were trying to enter Israeli territory (FALSE!) ie. Jews own wherever they say they own ie. you are a Goy, Jews are your slavemasters.

‘Dropped plans’ and ‘opted’ imply that Israel could have done otherwise if they so wished without fear (FALSE!) ie. Jews can do whatever they want to do ie. you are a Goy, Jews are your slavemasters.

‘Pro-Palestinian activists’ implies that the flotilla team have a particular tribal bias in favour of Palestinians (FALSE!) ie. nobody could possibly oppose Jews on moral grounds because Jewish actions define morality ie. you are a Goy, Jews are your slavemasters.

What the statement should have said:

Israel realized Wednesday that they could not contrive convincing criminal charges against the flotilla team even if they wanted to, resigning instead to release them from forced captivity immediately.

Their weakness and the ease with which they can be overthrown once we stop fighting each other is what they don’t want us to realize. SamiZataari has a good elaboration on this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPJENdfd62s

Attacking false statements will not stop Jews from making endlessly more false statements with which to keep us endlessly busy, because false statements can be made about every event. But they must use the same words to make their false statements every time. Therefore attack their words, and they will soon run out of words they can use for their lies. This is the propaganda victory that we are aiming for. Attack their words until every one of their words is made as worthless we have already made the word ‘anti-Semite’. Attack their words until every word they speak only increases the world’s disgust towards them. Words are what Jews use to simulate the existence of a soul. Attack their words, expose their soullessness, throw the vampires into the sun.

I just want to post a few very quick notes to the large number of anti-Zionists currently engaged in propaganda warfare over the IDF attack on the aid ship to Gaza. Yes, now is a good time to build momentum, but this time let us please try to streamline our efforts so as to maximize effectiveness.

1) Under no circumstances compare Israel to ‘the Nazis’. This is a mistake made by some newcomers to the subject, as well as a common deliberate tactic of Zionist agents posing as anti-Zionists. Instead we should ask: as we listen to Israel’s shameless inversion of truth about the attack on the aid ship and the conditions in Gaza, can anyone seriously believe they were being honest about the so-called ’Holocaust’?

2) Relentlessly point out the Jewish identity (where applicable) of non-Israeli, pro-Israel propagandists (Pamela Geller, David Horowitz, Melanie Philips, Lawrence Auster, Debbie Schlussel, etc.). As for the apparently anti-Israel Jews, ask them: why have they not declared apostasy from their Jewish heritage as a whole, since it is the Jewish identity that led to demand for a Jewish State of Israel in the first place?

3) Avoid getting stuck in a debate over ‘rights’. Instead, observe how the pro-Israel propagandists constantly resort to claims about Israel’s ‘right to exist’ that supposedly justifies its attacks on anyone it doesn’t like, thereby discrediting the concept of ‘rights’ altogether. Israel does not have a ‘right’ to exist, nor does Palestine. The only question we should be asking is the Aryanist question: which people, by their nobility of spirit, are more deserving of support?

4) Compare the policies proposed by the ZC ethnonationalist parties to the policies of Israel and note their unflattering similarities (e.g. Nick Griffin’s idea of sinking all ships carrying African immigrants). Thus link anti-Israel sentiment to anti-nationalist sentiment. Ask the ethnonationalists: how can they defend the ethnostate and then expect to be effective in calling for an end to the Jewish ethnostate?

5) Explicitly promote solidarity between Christianity and Islam on account of their common opposition to Judaism. In order to achieve this, do not hesitate to slam Christians who insult Muslims and Muslims who insult Christians. (If you get this far, mention that both Jesus and Mohammed were anti-Zionists murdered by Jews, and that the Second Christ and the Mahdi are expected to fight side by side against the Antichrist/Dajjal (ie. Jewish Messiah).)

Let’s see how it develops. Keep up the effort!

Just in case anyone has missed the memo: Jan Brewer (Governor of Arizona) is Jewish. I was pretty much ignoring what was going on in Arizona until I read Gentile comments praising her as the American version of Geert Wilders (Jew), so I checked, and indeed it was no surprise:

Brewer was born in Hollywood, California to Perry and Edna Drinkwine, and raised in a conservative Jewish Ashkenazi home (surname originally Dernkwein).

(Thanks to ZionistPower for saving the information originally posted on (Jewish-controlled) Wikipedia; it has since been deleted.)

It seems that everywhere we look, someone is trying to get someone else annoyed. We have Belgium and France banning the veil (my advice to the victims: wear a hygeine mask instead); we have Gentile pustule Lars Vilks (who would have been classified as a degenerate artist in National Socialist Germany) and his material making the rounds in Sweden; we have South Africans in the UK trying to use the attention towards the upcoming World Cup to promote a race war; we have the ridiculous ’Everybody Draw Mohammed Day’ claiming to be a free speech demonstration (when will we see these cowards do an ‘Everybody Question the Holocaust Day’?) but in fact is just aimed at insulting Muslims; and on top of all this we have Zionist South Korea trying to start WWIII with what seems to have been yet another false flag attack (in the wake of this news story is a good time to tell people about the attack on the USS Liberty).

Osher Litzman (right)

Until we have reason to believe otherwise, we assume North Korea is on our side. It is believed to have no resident Jews, does not recognize Israel, and supports other countries which do not recognize Israel such as Iran, Syria and Pakistan. With regard to the alleged torpedo, what could possibly be its motive for sinking an arbitrary ship?

All friction benefits our enemies. Every group has well-meaning people trying to talk their more stupid members out of escalating the friction, but I believe this will become less and less effective if they keep using the old rhetoric of criticizing ‘extremism’. The problem is not ‘extremism’, but tribalism. Not ‘hatred’, but selfishness. Not ‘fanaticism’, but preservationism. Not ‘supremacism’, but nepotism. As long as people place their own group above the other in importance simply because it is their own, pointless violence will continue. If the anti-war activists are unwilling to upgrade their vocabulary to highlight this issue, they might as well not bother with their activism at all. Those who sincerely want peace must first acknowledge the causes of unnecessary war.

Whatever happens ahead, remember the Aryanists. We - perhaps we alone - were the ones who truly wanted peace.

“The German nation wishes to live in peace with the rest of the world. But it is for this very reason that the Government of the Reich will employ every means to obtain the final removal of the division of the nations of the world into two categories.” - Adolf Hitler

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp-K163VhP4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fSvyv0urTE

We can also learn a few things:

1) Jews cannot answer our questions about Zionist propaganda. They cannot even lie effectively any more. They can only do the most cowardly thing of all: try to divert attention by asking their own questions. But if we can point out this technique as soon as we see it, it loses its effectiveness also.

2) Zionist propaganda relies on pretending that certain positions (e.g. that Hamas is a ‘terrorist’ group) are self-evident, hence removing the need to argue their case. This trick is only possible when the speaker is in a position of perceived authority. It follows that a key element of counterpropaganda is to remove the image of authority from our enemies. Our material, therefore, should minimize use of government statistics or university references. (Again we see how the ZC right-wingers - who constantly quote government data about crime rates of different ethnic groups or cite university papers about IQ gaps - are working against us by reinforcing the authority of these very sources.) The mere fact that the universities failed to lead the 9/11 investigation thoroughly discredited them long ago.

3) “Are you asking me to put myself on a cross?” It seems only a few people caught the significance of this line. Albahri is reminding us how Jews trapped Jesus. Jesus prior to his crucifixion was well aware of what was planned for him, but he went ahead nonetheless. Albahri was also aware of what Horowitz was playing at, but she openly stated her position at the end of the clip regardless. This is what is meant by “taking up your own cross”.

“My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. … How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison.” - Adolf Hitler

(Contrast with Yahweh-worshipper and false anti-Zionist James Wickstrom who calls himself a Christian, but who is spiritually Jewish.)

Since Albahri is in the USA, and it is unlikely that all Jews will gather in Israel, I encourage her to support this group if she wants to get something done:

http://www.subvertednation.net/

So-called “conservative Jews” have begun to come out in large numbers to blame problems of society on “liberal Jews”. We can be sure to see more and more of them as the economy continues to fall apart. And the right-wing ZC Gentile idiots (especially the race preservationists) are falling for it.

As usual, we must reject Jewish terminology. Historically, Jews have been neither conservative nor liberal with consistent loyalty. What they have always been is ahead of the curve. They anticipate every swing of the Gentile collective consciousness years and decades before the Gentiles themselves do so, and a group of them race to the cusp of the swing to help it into motion. The late-arriving Gentiles then assume the Jews who express these views (often more eloquently than their Gentile counterparts) are assets to their movement. Jews are no more conservative or liberal than cattle herders are eaters of grass or eaters of corn. Herders give the cattle what the cattle are in the mood to eat. Herders then eat the cattle. Not all the cattle at the same time, though, as they need a sustainable cattle population. This is why a world under Jewish control will never treat one group badly all the time, nor everyone badly at the same time. Therefore those whose concern is merely how their own group is treated will always eagerly accept the false victory that Jews give them when it is their turn to be treated well again, and nothing will ever be solved.

The way to break free of control by those who are always ahead of the curve is simple: leave the curve.

“Through ignorance, passion and hatred, decisions are taken which, in their injustice and lack of logic, contain the seeds of fresh conflicts.” - Adolf Hitler

Conservatism is injustice; liberalism is illogic. Both are unacceptable. Nature must be neither accepted (as by conservatives), nor denied (as by liberals), but acknowledged and then overcome.

While it is a sign of our progress in the propaganda war that Jews trying to lead the dissent this time are at least forced to blame other Jews, it is also - as I repeat over and over again - increasingly the case that simply acknowledging disproportionate Jewish influence is not enough, even redundant. Anyone by now can point out Israeli and international Jewish power. The question is: what is their plan? Knowing who the enemy is while being completely misled over their plan is hardly an improvement.

This is why I have (despite criticism by some who downplay the importance of verbal precision) insisted on retaining the term ‘Zionism’ in my vocabulary. Judaism is the membership; Zionism is the agenda. Many people spreading anti-Jewish propaganda either do not have a clue about Zionism or are Zionists themselves. Either way, they are confusing the hell out of newcomers because there is no agreement among this propaganda on what Jews are trying to do to us! There has been a vague idea that the more people speaking out against Jewish power (for whatever reason) the better, and that inaccuracies in their description of Zionism should thus be overlooked. I suggest now is the time for a stricter attitude. Anyone who blames Jews but misrepresents Zionism should be treated as a liability to the movement, whether out of ignorance or malice. Because if our picture of Zionism is inaccurate, our countermeasures will also miss the mark.

For example, we can no longer tolerate anyone who claims that Jews are allied with one or more non-Jewish ethnicities/religions in a genocidal plot against another ethnicity/religion. Amazingly, it seems that every group has people who claim their group - and their group alone - is targeted for extermination by a mysterious alliance between Jews and everyone else. This is nothing but a simple inversion trick of projecting the Jews’ own age-old fear (that all non-Jews will one day join forces to overthrow THEM) onto us. As each group reacts to this projection by becoming suspicious of other groups, the projection looks more realistic to other groups who then react in the same way, and so on until civil war results (the true Zionist agenda). Here is a good example of how to deal with such people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7R4wg4YrY

(This clip featured a black Gentile, but of course some white Gentiles have similar beliefs that require demolishing. (“Anyone with the least bit of tactical sense knows that you never purposefully destroy your own cover. If not for the existence of the people known as ‘whites’, Jews would be unable to pass themselves off as ‘white’.” - John Alan Martinson Jr., responding to moronic assertions that white extinction is on the Zionist agenda.))

The best thing to do in this regard is to adopt our Aryanist vocabulary (see the Glossary page). Dump the old group identities. There are no black, white, brown, yellow races, only Aryans, Gentiles and Jews (each of which come in all ethnicities). There are no Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, etc., only Aryans who consider Jesus, Mohammed, Siddhartha, etc. as their teacher, Gentiles who vainly want to associate themselves with the power of these names, and Jews who have deliberately infiltrated the institutions inspired by these names. There are no conservatives or liberals, nor capitalists or communists, only unradicalized Aryans choosing the lesser of two evils, Gentiles who believe one will serve themselves better than the other, and Jews manipulating both for Zionism. There is no Eastern civilization or Western civilization, only Aryan voices drowned beneath Gentile voices led by Jewish voices. There are not even male and female, only Aryans (uncorrupt youth), Gentiles (corruption by masculinity) and Jews (corruption by femininity). (By the way, Henry Makow is a Zionist agent.)

All group classifications can be deconstructed in this way; you will always find Aryans, Gentiles and Jews underneath. These are the only dividing lines that should be drawn right now. There are only Aryans trying to draw these lines before time runs out, Gentiles who do not understand these lines, and Jews who know the threat posed to them by these lines. Get drawing!

In these last few months I have been concentrating on leaving comments on other sites. For those who are on board with our basic ideas, there isn’t much to discuss with each other at the moment. Rather, now is a good time to post as many anti-Zionist comments as possible on right-wing sites (many of which are linked to and promoted from openly Jewish sites) which try to distract people away from Zionism with false dangers. Their growing audiences - people being led into believing that Jews are on their side against ‘Islamic extremists’ and ‘Third-Worlders’ - are the ones who need most to hear the anti-Zionist message.

We who constantly slam Geert Wilders, Nick Griffin, etc. are doing exactly the same as the genuine American anti-Zionists who were constantly slamming Ron Paul back in 2008. In order for real revolution, it is essential that we keep people away from false revolutionaries.

If done effectively, with our information provided in stages, I have found that we can actually discourage our enemies from posting so frequently, because each time they post, we can respond by releasing to their readers a bit more of what they don’t want people to read. Either that or they have to enable comment censorship on their blogs, which greatly reduces their credibility.

I have, however, been experiencing what seems to be low-level harassment. On several occasions following a commenting spree, my internet connection gets cut off, forcing me to change IP address, contact tech support, etc. to reconnect. Which is why I’m back here, to hopefully get more people doing this since so I don’t get cut off all the time.

I do have a few propaganda vocabulary observations to share, however:

1) Recently, the enemy term ‘Judeo-Christian culture’ is slowly being replaced with ‘Christian-Judeo culture’. Whereas the former term sounded like a mere acknowledgement that Christian literature includes the Old Testament (which, incidentally, it should not), the latter term is suggestive that Judaism itself (and thus Jews) have been historically accepted (and that we should somehow forget the 100+ expulsions they received in the past).

2) With regard to ‘Islamic extremists’, I quote David Myatt’s classic line: “An Islamic extremist is a Muslim who does not conform to what the kuffar believe a Muslim should be.” This sums it all up, really. (Aryans can be characterized similarly using this format: An Aryan is a non-Jew who does not conform to what Jews expect a Gentile to be.)

3) The term ‘Third-Worlder’ has now become a coward’s racial slur. A good way to counter this is to simply demand that people define the term; few can do so, and those who do reveal their semantic dishonesty. (Actually, ‘Third World’ originally referred to economic Third Positionism ie. any country that supported neither capitalism nor communism. National Socialist Germany, for example, would have been a Third World country.)

I do want to get back to deeper topics at some stage, but this will have to wait.

The reason I haven’t been posting much is because it has become so obvious by now that if you still need an explanation, you are probably not the kind of person we are looking for.

Even after all this time, I still underestimate how low Jewish behaviour is willing to sink. Basically Jews killed a Palestinian child’s brother, took a photo of the child crying, edited the photo and used it for an ad asking for donations to Israel:

http://rainbowwarrior2005.wordpress.com/2010/01/14/us-charity-uses-little-palestinian-childs-photo-to-raise-money-for-israels-hungry

On the subject of donations, let me get in a quick word on the issue of donations to Haiti following the (possibly engineered) earthquake. In principle, I totally believe in charity, and - despite Zionist historians attempting to depict National Socialism as an uncaring ideology - Hitler not only promoted charity but considered only National Socialists capable of sincere compassion (as opposed to mere patronizing gestures of the same):

“If positive Christianity means love of one’s neighbour, i.e. the tending of the sick, the clothing of the poor, the feeding of the hungry, the giving of drink to those who are thirsty, then it is we who are the more positive Christians.” - Adolf Hitler

The current problem is that we can no longer trust the mainstream ’aid’ organizations, many of which have been actively involved in Zionist agendas such as forced vaccinations and forced water fluoridation. We cannot be sure whether any money we send will reach Haiti in the first place, nor can we be sure whether it will be used to actually help the Haitians:

http://voiceofvenom.com/blog/articles/jews-harvest-organs-in-haiti/

Therefore I suggest that, unless you personally know someone who lives around there and who can get things done directly with the money, do not donate. Instead, donate to the activists devoted to breaking the Jewish criminal power structure, only after which will genuine charity efforts have a chance to flourish.

From the Aryanist perspective, genuine charity should be about ending problems, not merely fixing them until they rise again. Therefore any charity that does not deal with reducing population and improving demographics is no charity at all. All poverty is created by population increase in a finite habitat. Everything else (industry, commerce, migration, etc.) does not create poverty, but merely changes how it is distributed in space and time. Genuine charity, therefore, must not be (as it currently is) just another of many influences on the distribution of poverty, but should focus its power on preventing its creation.

As I have said before (and as Hitler predicted), world population will decrease drastically very soon. If we do not decrease it ourselves, nature will decrease it for us. The difference is that natural selection is guaranteed to get rid of the kind, conscientious and honourable people (of all ethnicities), whereas National Socialism will at least attempt the opposite. Natural selection is guaranteed to leave behind a population of prolific, amoral survivalists which will not hesitate to explode its numbers all over the planet again in the future once conditions permit, whereas National Socialism aims to leave behind a population which will know better. This is what real charity should be about.

I am currently reading this book by Subverted Nation (Adam Austin) that was banned by Lulu just yesterday. It can be downloaded here:

http://www.subvertednation.net/documents/basic-training-for-revolutionaries.pdf

It is an annotated collection of quotations from both Jews and other historical figures, organized in such a way as to paint a full background to the struggle against Jewish domination. The main power of the book is that it allows the quoted to speak for themselves, leaving little room for accusations of defamation. The author’s own words, though few, also deserve praise for being motivational without becoming politically partisan (unlike my work). In addition, the book conveniently includes the full text of the Protocols of Zion, so I recommend that all anti-Zionists wishing to introduce more people to the Protocols from now on direct them to this book instead.

I found this quote (which was previously unknown to me) particularly resonant with the Aryanist perspective:

“Finally, there seem to be but three Ways for a Nation to acquire Wealth. The first is by War as the Romans did in plundering their conquered Neighbours. This is Robbery. The second by Commerce which is generally Cheating. The third by Agriculture the only honest Way; wherein Man receives a real Increase of the Seed thrown into the Ground, in a kind of continual Miracle wrought by the Hand of God in his favour, as a Reward for his innocent Life, and virtuous Industry.” – Benjamin Franklin

It is almost a total parallel to the hunter, herder and farmer archetypes to which I have referred on numerous occasions as a model to explain Gentile, Jewish and Aryan behaviour respectively. Perhaps in the post-Zionist future, these words of Franklin can help to inspire in Americans a return to a simpler, more ethical lifestyle. And to help reach this future as soon as possible, I recommend everyone living in the US to check out this group:

http://www.realoathkeepers.org/