A few months ago I entered into conversation with Abu Haydar al Ashraf, the leader of Die Faziste Wehrmacht, a movement based in the Philippines. He set up the movement a few years ago, but due to a few traitors, it broke apart. Since then, he has worked hard to reorganize Die Faziste Wehrmach and bring it back to life, and, though still small and still growing, he has been successful. Abu Haydar is an humble, honest and honourable individual, and worthy of being the future Aryan leader of the Philippines. I ask every Filipino Aryanist to help him in this struggle by pledging allegiance to him. He has sent us a brief description of his movement.

—

Upon our introduction we wish to state that we are of a nation in Southeast Asia that is plagued by major degeneracy (the likes of Liberalism, Communism and Zionism) and thus it be of intent that we cleanse our nation of these filth. what pains us are the sprouting liberal cultures growing like weeds on the wall, slowly eating it from the inside till the wall is no more but a stony tooth pick. And that our generation in the land have developed the habit of cursing mothers and fathers, elders and that respect is no more than a stony tooth pick we call a culture, the nature of praising degeneracy and showing support to inferiority (i.e. popular Jewry) and this excessive love and admiration to foreign folk and their culture leaving the sight of their own kinsmen in humility to their view.

We all know what happened on 18 September in Scotland, and there is no reason to continue to analyze the situation. Disappointing as the results are, the possibility of Scottish independence has pushed pro-independence fervour in Catalonia.

This Sunday a referendum will be held regarding Catalan independence, which the Spanish parliament opposes (as “illegal”). The best response is to push ahead with it, and to continue to build on the pro-independence sentiment (which has already been growing in the past few years), which will show that Catalonia can and does operate separately from Spain, further building on the pro-independence sentiment. And if Sunday’s referendum is not successful, mass demoralization need not follow because the referendum is more of an opinion poll for future action than a decisive referendum in Catalonia’s independence.

If the pro-independence movement is to go ahead, I suggest the following:

1) Breaking cultural ties with Western Civilization. Instead, Catalonia could focus on its Cathar past. (This does not mean, and should not mean, any animosity towards Muslims or any other religious group. In fact, the rebirth of Catharism should also result in the reinvigoration of its Mohammedan parallel, Sufism, and other parallel groups in other religions.)

2) Following Sunday’s referendum, moving attention away from Artur Mas and Oriol Junqueras (and their respective parties). Mas can only push post-independence Catalonia to the right, which may eventually even lead to an increase in ethnocentrism in Catalonia. Junqueras will make post-independence Catalonia a republic. They are perfect for each other, but not for us. This means you should either form your own secessionist party or becoming an entryist into one of the other parties (preferable Junqueras’ as it is at least on the Left). Note that if you choose to form a new party, your will have to be extremely more enthusiastic, more charismatic, more active and more effective in organization and propaganda because secession is already a commonplace topic and is most closely associated with the other parties; in other words, you need to become better known and more popular than them, and quickly.

3) Friendly relationships with neighbouring states. This will give Catalonia a better reputation on an international scale, initially help to set the economy rolling, and perhaps create a gateway into the western Mediterranean and beyond. (As a bonus, Catalonia could lead the way in building relationships with North African states, countering both the rise of the far-right and establishing control of the Mediterranean.) Also, there is no reason whatsoever to not have friendly relationships with the people of other states, especially as poor relationships create tension between different peoples: the only dichotomies we really need right now is Aryan vs non-Aryan and non-Jew vs Jew.

4. Rejoining the EU upon secession (without adopting the Euro), thereby leading the way in forming an anti-Zionist block in the EU and pushing other member states in the same direction.

If you have any other ideas, mention them below. More importantly, if you are an Aryanist living in Spain (preferably in Catalonia) and would like to see an Aryanist post-independence Catalonia, get in contact with us!

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

In an attempt to spread knowledge about Jewish crimes more quickly, many of the early post-9/11 truthers attempted to get in contact with the far-right. Both sides believed they could win out of this connection - popularity for the truthers and young members for the old far-rightists. To create this connection, the truthers began to feature far-right ideas in anti-Zionist work, thus bringing the two so closely together that today virtually anybody who wishes to learn more about Jewish domination will also read far-right material sooner or later. This means Gentiles find a group in which they belong more easily, leading not only to the popularization of the far-right, but also to strengthening the misconception that the far-right and anti-Zionism go hand in hand. This is also problematic for Aryans who are not yet familiar with anti-Zionism because either they cannot find the far-right appealing and so they drop anti-Zionism along with it, or because they may repress their instinctive contempt for rightist ideas in order to become more informed, often losing confidence in their own instincts and fooling themselves into joining the far-right, thus giving it members that are unusually loyal and idealistic. (There is also the possibility of pursuing anti-Zionism while standing aloof of rightist hubris, but this will become more difficult as the far-right increasingly dominates the scene with each passing day. As if that weren’t enough, Jews are also beginning to portray themselves as “anti-Zionists” - usually doing nothing more than jumping on the anti-Israel bandwagon - without joining either the far-right or leaving the tribe. For those who don’t get what’s going on, a brief study of the relationship between Israel and Apartheid South Africa may be helpful.)

The Solution

Obviously the problem won’t be solved unless meaningful action and organization is carried out in the real world. (http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/) The propaganda war must also be fought constantly in order to find new members, and the Internet is a perfect place to do this. It has been used so far by our BS opponents, but also by genuine anti-Zionists (and Jews trying to enter this scene also!). While those who are genuinely anti-Zionists have their heart in the right place - and so we would easily accept them in our ranks - they tend to dabble in the ideas of the False Left, promoting democracy, human rights and countless other ideas - or if not they find sympathy for anarchy - alongside with anti-Zionism. This only complicates matters, wasting our time with debates as to whether or not Israel is a democracy (who cares?) or about the human rights of Jews in Israel (again, who cares?). (Gentiles have also picked up on the Zionist rhetoric when it comes to these matters, using it for their own tribe instead.)

As for our movement, while we are ethically upright and intellectually sound, we are easily mistaken for neo-Nazis especially by those who don’t bother to read our articles and the soundest ideas are hard to accept simply because of the baggage associated with the Third Reich. We’ve debated the matter in the past and we are sticking with our style, simply because the National Socialism was a real ideology which merits to be discussed if we are to get to the truth of the matter, especially as it is closely associated with anti-Zionism in the popular mind.

On the other hand, we cannot afford to be too inflexible either. If our ideas are to be shared, we cannot afford to have them be unapproachable because of historical lies. We need a web site for the True Left without the National Socialist theme. In this fashion, people may find some of our ideas a bit odd at first, but will have an easier time accepting them if they didn’t think of them first and foremost as “Nazi ideas”. The website will link to this one in a place that is easy to spot. It will act as a liaison for Aryans between whatever their actual misconceptions are and our movement.

The Team

In order to create this web site, a team of at least three dedicated people is needed. As the web site expands, more sections can be added to the site, and, when appropriate, more people to the administrative team, but the essentials for now are:

Ideology - The purpose of this section is to discuss matters of ideology. It will be essentially the same as our three sections on culture, philosophy and politics, and, if possible, religion. This section is extremely important as it’s meant to familiarize Aryans with the True Left - i.e., it’s the essential purpose of the site. Newcomers, even if trying to keep an open mind, will probably have ideas from any shade of the political spectrum which may contradict our own. Seeing why their ideas are wrong (if they are) is just as important as seeing why ours are right if we want a true conversion. Some examples of potential topics are ‘Universalism without Egalitarianism’, ‘Anti-Traditional Absolutism’, ‘Identity vs Personality’.

In the negative aspect of the work, you will be countering two positions. Firstly, you will have to counter the right. Admittedly, we cannot do much about those who are instinctually drawn to the right; again, our purpose is not to draw Gentiles to the True Left, but Aryans. What we are seeing today is a shift in popularity from the left towards the right. What is needed to counter this is to counter right-wing ideas and arguments methodically so that those who are not rightists (i.e. Aryans), but are seeing the right as an alternative to the disappointing False Left, will not be drawn into the sphere of the right. One example is ‘Anti-Traditional Absolutism’: many are disappointed with relativism of the False Left, and in the hope of finding something more meaningful they’ll accept traditional (right-wing) absolutes as alternatives, so what we need to do is to show that the real alternative is not the traditional absolute, but the absolutes of the True Left and especially immanence.

Secondly, for those who have stuck with the False Left, it is crucial for them to change their position - not from left to right, but from False Left to True Left. If they aren’t going along with the flow from left to right, this is a sign that their heart is in the correct place, though their ideas may not be, which not only weakens their position (and confidence), but also strengthens the right. We need to show them what the left is through topics such as ‘Universalism without Egalitarianism’. Also important is to remove behavioural patterns the False Left has been fixing into its followers’ minds for years, such as the unwillingness to engage in physical combat - we cannot expect victory against the increasingly militarized right if we don’t become militants as well. This doesn’t mean turning the leftists into barbarians, but reawakening the warrior spirit. Consequently, we need to make sure we get rid of the focus on rights, not only because the intellectual premise from which they emerge is incorrect, but also because the hope for some sort of gratification is always present; we need a sense of duty arising from moral superiority and a willingness for complete sacrifice in carrying out one’s duties.

If this task is overwhelming, feel free to work with others on it and get others involved in individual work.

Politics - This section is not primarily meant as a place to debate political ideology - that is reserved for the “Ideology” section - but to be on top of news, to rise above false dichotomies and to present them from our angle. This task will not be easy not only because one must be thoroughly familiar with ideology, but also because deception in the news is a constant. If you are certain you are up for the task, you are welcome to take it. Also, there are about 200 states in the world, so obviously not everything can be covered; however, if regional experts can be found, get them involved.

History - Where do we cut off the “past” from the “present” in order to separate this section from the previous one? As a rule of thumb, anything post-9/11 will fall into “Politics”, and anything pre-9/11 into “History”. If the historical roots of a political matter are important, by all means include them in an article under “Politics”, and if the present-day results of historical events are mentioned, simply keep it in this section. In any case, this section is not to be used to solely discuss the Third Reich, but ought to be for history in general. It is especially important to discuss historical trends, such as the fall of monarchies, and not focus on “isolated” events or individuals who, though inspiring, haven’t really impacted the world; however, if you ever feel particularly inspired by an exemplary Aryan, you’re free to do an article about the character, but don’t let this form the bulk of the work. Articles on topics such as the extinction of dinosaurs or the battle between Cro-Magnon man and Neanderthals, while potentially interesting, are not extremely relevant, so do not spend too much time on them. Mythology or articles like our own “Aryan Diffusion” series are also welcome. There is a wide span of time to discuss, so feel free to gather experts, especially as the site expands.

The history section is not as important as the other two, but it still has a value. Beyond merely presenting history in accordance with our worldview, we need to make sure that we correct some potential mistakes and give a general nudge in the right direction. In Aryan Diffusion Part 3 and Part 4, we corrected the mistaken beliefs that the Vedics and other Indo-European nomads (and Indo-Europeans in general) were/are Aryans, meaning that we can assess other matters such as the lifestyle of the original Aryans or their religious beliefs without contradicting ourselves. On the topic of the fall of monarchies and aristocracies, while we do not respect degenerate monarchs, and so we encourage their downfall, we need to show that what followed historically - republics and democracies - and those responsible for popularizing these ideas - Freemasons - were far inferior to what could have followed - absolute Aryan dictatorships - led by Aryans.

—

It is crucial to work together. This doesn’t mean that all articles have to be team projects, but that you should let each other know what you are working on and how you can help each other out.

Of these three sections, the “Ideology” and “Politics” ones are the most important. If at least two people can be found for these sections, then you may start before a historian joins the team, but if one of the two is missing, it is better to wait until somebody joins the team to work on the missing section.

Questions, Answers & Discussions

Newcomers will have questions, and answering them is just as important as creating them. A contact address like our own will be needed to do this, and the administrators will have to keep up to date and answer e-mails.

Answering questions and discussing various issues means that numerous e-mails on the same topic will be coming in because conversations by e-mail are usually one-on-one. One solution to this would be to have a public area for discussion such as a blog. This can function in the same way as our own. Another solution would be to have a forum, but this would be more helpful only if the site attracts many visitors. Also, people like to be reassured others are also interested in what they are, and it is best that the site does not show itself as empty in its early stages. The blog is better suited for this purpose because the blog will look new, not empty, while a forum will probably have many largely empty subsections (which one is tempted to create for future discussions) and will not generate as much discussion. It is best to stick with a blog for now.

So who’s in?

If you think you are fit for the job, or would like to discuss matters pertaining to the web site, send in a contact form detailing which section you’d like to cover.

We will have to check your ability to communicate your ideas on matters dealing with your section and your understanding on them. To do this, you’ll need to send us at least one article about a relevant topic. On the bright side, think of it as a head start because you will already have at least one article for each section before you even open the site.