Over the years we have received a lot of questions and also had to deal with a lot of poorly informed presumptions about who the original Aryans were. On one hand we have the racists with their usual nonsense. On the other hand we have the equally annoying antifa types who make fun of the word “Aryan” as if it were a term that only neo-Nazis use and which should not appear in serious discussion at all.
With the aim to restore both sensibility and gravity to this extremely serious racial term (hey, we managed to do this for political National Socialism, so why not for Aryan racial theory?), we finally decided to put together a series of pages to summarize Aryan diffusion worldwide, which we will be releasing one at a time. Here is the first page; our first stop is Japan:
http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-1/
JJ will answer questions anyone may have. I will also jump in as necessary. However, please try to limit discussion to Japan only. There will be a chance to discuss other regions later. It should be noted that these pages are not intended to cover the entire history of the various countries. We will only mention events considered to be key turning points from demographic or ideological perspectives.
If you are Japanese and have Yayoi blood memory, please consider joining our movement. Contact us:
http://aryanism.net/about/contact/
And everyone, please help us get our message out there. Serious racial study is the exact opposite of ethnic stereotyping: it is about looking within an ethnic group and seeing the prehistoric types which went into forming it, thus leading to non-prejudice towards individuals based on awareness that each individual could represent any superposition of those types. It’s only the ZC approach that encourages ethnic stereotyping (as is its intention), and that’s not what we do here. Aryanists are building a reputation: everyone who has talked to our team members in any depth knows that we in personality are the exact opposite of the racist far-right which we despise. We are living evidence that racial study does not cause racism. It is racists (by which of course we include Jews) who abuse racial study to add ballast to the ethnotribalism that they carry in their inferior genes. (This in itself is a racial conclusion, which egalitarians could never have reached.)
The point is, genetics are going to become more important, not less important, in future political debate; leftists need to focus their energy on preparing to win this debate instead of wasting their energy trying to delay its advent. And the way to win it is simple: learn Aryanism. The far-right won’t know what hit them. And then we can tell them what hit them: UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY.
By the way, don’t forget to watch My Neighbour Totoro if you haven’t already; here is Miecz’s old review:
https://swordofelysium.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/original-nobility-in-my-neighbor-totoro/
Entries (RSS)
AS, congratulations on completing the first installation of this large and well-researched project.
Thank you for your help with this project! (I’ll do Part 6 if you don’t want to.)
By the way, here is a picture showing the contrast between Jomon and Yayoi clothes:
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/23/34735643_83ce6f9f5a_z.jpg?zz=1
At first I considered including it on the page, but decided against it as the models’ faces don’t really fit the types they are supposed to be playing. But ignoring the faces, we see a consistent pattern between the dress aesthetics and the pottery aesthetics: Gentiles are addicted to complexity.
It’s quite obvious which blood memory was behind later-era cloth:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/MoriokaStudentinnen.JPG/743px-MoriokaStudentinnen.JPG
I’m glad to have contributed by coming up with the idea in the first place, and you have done exactly what I had in mind but to a much higher standard than I could have imagined.
This is a difficult subject and one I’ve personally struggled with. I’m pleased to read this latest addition and I’m happier still to think I belong to the Aryan archetype. Maybe in reality I don’t, I’m not presumptuous enough to believe I have enough blood memory, but I’d like to think so and I’ll defend such memory and traits until I expire.
When I was about 5 or 6 years old, at school we had library time once per week where we got to just pick whatever book we wanted and read for 30 minutes. One time I picked a picture book about prehistoric man. It had lots of pictures of everything from Austropalithecus, Habilis, Erectus, Neanderthals, Sapiens, pictures of the flint tools, cave paintings, deer being skinned, etc.. Then after going through all that, there was a picture of a man in a field, and a caption about the “Farm Age” beginning. Then I turned the page and it was the end of the book! I felt an anticlimax, as the “Farm Age” sounded much more appealing to me, yet that was the era that the book chose not to cover! I guess that could be described as my first conscious blood memory event.
Very well done! In regards to upcoming articles, will they center on specific nations/countries, general regions or both? I’m excited about what’s to follow.
It is refreshing to see how readily the Japanese accept biological and archaeological realities that the ‘enlightened West’ refuses to accept.
Compare the Jomon skull with the original Cro-Magnon skull found in south-western France:
http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/jomon-yayoi-skulls-2.jpg
http://www.dinosoria.com/hominides/cro-magnon-d-1.jpg
The orbits (eye sockets) are markedly rectangular, and the the top of the skull slopes to a ‘point’ of sorts (rather than being smooth, like the Yayoi skull), indicating physical robustness.
I can’t really add much to what has been said about Japan at the moment, but I have some images of people from Sakhalin Island and the surrounding continental area (that is, the ancient relatives of the Japanese Yayoi who continued migrating north on the continent), which show the startling physical contrast of the neolithic and paleolithic traits in the region like fleshless skulls never could. I know you say to limit discussion to Japan, so I’ll only post them if you think it wouldn’t be ‘derailing’ the subject.
@Decebal
“In regards to upcoming articles, will they center on specific nations/countries, general regions or both?”
Since mythology is a big part of it, we try to go with the major mythospheres, which usually corresponds to a main country but which relates to surrounding areas also. Actually, we find that the best correspondence with an Aryan mythosphere is usually a major river basin.
@JJ
“I know you say to limit discussion to Japan, so I’ll only post them if you think it wouldn’t be ‘derailing’ the subject.”
Please post them. People like yourself don’t derail subjects, only expand them.
By the way, since we are going to be hyping the “Aryan vs Turanian” paradigm throughout this series, I might as well throw in these two pictures right now:
http://www.satanicreds.org/satanicreds/faces-xtoid.jpg
http://www.satanicreds.org/satanicreds/faces-tur.jpg
What do you think?
You know the work of Peter Camper right?
He studied the facial angel and its correlation with intelligence etc.
1. http://bit.ly/141N7dT
2. http://bit.ly/16WzpDO
Paleolithic or Jomon traits in a Nivkh (Gilyak) man - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/NSRW_-_Asiatic_Types_-_Giljak_Man.jpg
Nivkh woman -http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/45/NSRW_-_Asiatic_Types_-_Giljak_Woman.jpg
Nivkh man - http://i781.photobucket.com/albums/yy91/nt_1488/asia%20central/mongoloid_race_raza_mongoloide.jpg
Nivkh man - http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSclJQTnaaMsXebKSzlykcR2fyNet5n3bHXXPbi4Ft-gtyWHlmHmXEqg9z9
Neolithic or Yayoi traits in a Nivkh man (bottom) - http://www.ahnenkult.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Image-3.jpg
Orochi people (I’ll let you guys see if you can find who out of the four has neolithic traits):
http://www.ahnenkult.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Image-6.jpg
http://www.ahnenkult.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Image-1.jpg
Neolithic traits in a Nanai (Golde/Hezhe) man - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/NSRW_-_Asiatic_Types_-_Golde.jpg
Notice how much smaller the father’s cheek-bones are compared to his family (although he still has a rather large jaw) - http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iWXi1nlqBK4/TQUN-8otSqI/AAAAAAAABy4/SmPfwJFALj8/s1600/Hezhe_%2528Nanai%2529_family.jpg
Both men certainly look different from the typical Nanai people who possess very wide cheek bones - http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iWXi1nlqBK4/TQUNn4DJlUI/AAAAAAAAByo/R9EKhZbdI9k/s1600/18.JPG
There are a few further examples here, where you can notice some ‘hybrid types’ who have relatively long skulls, but wide faces and large jaws: http://www.ahnenkult.com/tag/sakhalin/
Compare the paleolithic-looking examples above to the Ainu people of Japan and south Sakhalin Island:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Sakhalin_ainu_men_II.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/AinuSan.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-g-OtBZv-62M/TeH9KQgZwvI/AAAAAAAAHj8/Xkb_Uhpt77g/s1600/ainub.jpg
Here is an ethno-linguistic map showing the peoples I have mentioned: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IceW8OGqMwQ/TmLzMhc8cHI/AAAAAAAABX0/ZL-Z_U2EhVU/s1600/Northeast+Asia+Language+map.jpg
It seems that they traveled up the Songhua-Amur River system, although so far I haven’t done any research on the people living further downstream. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Amurrivermap.png
Frai, I think Camper was focused more on the artistic aspect of skull shape/type than the biological/racial implications of it. Most of the time pre-1945 anthropometrists/physical anthropologists did very accurate measurements of their subjects, but I don’t really know if such precise details ever yielded much practical results.
It’s not necessarily facial angle in itself which is related to intelligence, but brain shape and other factors that I am not well-versed in.
Notice how on these old Cro-Magnon (e.g. paleolithic/Gentile) skulls there is no prognathism (meaning, the profile angle is straight):
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/5310/borrebyskull8.jpg
Oberkassel skull, 14,000 years old - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/OBERK3.jpg
The top is a female skull, notice the extremely high sexual dimorphism - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e8/OBERCAS1.jpg
Where as many Jews have prognathism (whether or not it is because they have ‘archaic Neanderthal DNA’ or something else doesn’t detract from the fact that Jews are quite clever!)
Amy Winehouse (Jew) - http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/tattoo/images/celeb_winehouse/large/winehouse_amy_001.jpg
A straight forehead, non-extreme chin, no brow-ridges (neolithic traits) are more important than simply having a straight profile (i.e. one free of prognathism).
http://i34.tinypic.com/1z6xsnp.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img59/7277/5ulw.jpg
Now, again, contrast this with the sloped forehead found in Cro-Magnons:
Ancient Cro-Magnon skull - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/95/Cro-Magnon-male-skull.png/574px-Cro-Magnon-male-skull.png
Henry Morgentaler (Jew) - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/HenryMorgentaler.jpg
Jared Taylor (Gentile) (I bet he is pretty mad that the dark-skinned people posted above are racially superior to him)- http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/jared-taylor-gentile.jpg
—-
This ‘demonic Turanian’ look seems to have a combination of deep set eyes and wide cheek bones, but isn’t necessarily robust. They appear to be reduced/generalized Cro-Magnons. Looking at the images for a while, it seems to me that they are ‘demonic’ because of something to do with the face extending so much further horizontally around the eyes. (Maybe it is because the eyes appear to be rather wide-set, as well?)
For example, I’ve always thought male orangutans were very creepy and menacing:
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2302/2496775130_9324df49c6_z.jpg
http://photos.runawayjuno.com/Travel/Year-2012/i-qNq7m5r/0/L/oranutan-borneo-indonesia-7217-L.jpg
http://photos0.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Orangutan-Pictures.jpg
I don’t think any of the fellows above could pull off a picture like this: http://t.wallpaperweb.org/wallpaper/animals/t490/angelic-face-sumatran-orangutan_15101.jpg
I also think a certain Jewish CEO of Goldman Sachs would feel at home with his Turanian brothers!
http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Lloyd+Blankfein+Celebs+Celebrate+Marriage+OpV94u-mz7tl.jpg
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-IK082_weidne_DV_20100505154436.jpg
@AS, that’s sensible: cultures tend to spread along waterways, especially larger ones.
@John Johnson, from what I understand of classical phenotypal taxonomy, the Turanian type is a (mainly) Central Asian relative of the European Dinaric, and, if I remember correctly, they’re both Mesolithic types.
Dinarics:
http://i1.tinypic.com/ohmqv9.jpg
http://i.pixs.ru/storage/4/1/1/3jpg_2585746_1921411.jpg
More extreme example: http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/7533/64590670.jpg
I’ve noticed the same type of eyes amongst Dinaric types, though it’s more rare.
Then there are many Turanians with Altaic influence (Tungid, as it’s called). Perhaps this is what causes the odd eyes that are not as common in Dinarid types.
Tungids:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SoSJSGyj4QE/UKxX2fRCisI/AAAAAAAAEkI/RbMrDvpwW7U/s400/western-mongolian-man_12253_600x450.jpg
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSclJQTnaaMsXebKSzlykcR2fyNet5n3bHXXPbi4Ft-gtyWHlmHmXEqg9z9
I believe the “Turanid sub-race” wasn’t a very thoroughly researched classification and probably wasn’t the best use of the linguistic/cultural term ‘Turanian’. (Think about all the ways the name “Aryan” has been misappropriated by different terminology.) It seems AS is trying to hint at a much older and better known link with the nomadic herding Khazars, as well as a more general terminology of settled farming people vs. nomadic herder/hunters.
Round-faced chubby people like this have been classified as ‘Turanid’: http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/1058/41836023vx7.jpg
As well as people with a longer and more angular face (can you spot any Jewish cultural influence in these photos?): http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/7500/tur1.jpg ; http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/1192/tur2y.jpg
I believe your ‘extreme example’ is just an exemplary or ‘pure’ example of the non-Jewish ‘Dinarid’ type in Europe. Here are some examples of the process/selective pressure of ‘Dinaricization’ carried out to extreme ends (don’t let the geographic name fool you, this ‘type’ is found in many more places than Armenia):
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Armenoid_Armenian.jpg
(1st man): http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y227/Liquid_Len/gebirge1.jpg
http://s167.photobucket.com/user/blahface_03/media/armenian.jpg.html
Compare to a sexy Jew: http://img0110.popscreencdn.com/155938098_1969-singer-ukulele-player-tiny-tim-packs-belongings-.jpg
From my understanding of ‘Dinarids’, they generally correspond to mountainous herding peoples. They’ve underwent the same selective pressure that caused the traits of a stereotypical Jew, maybe they share a more substantial relation? I don’t know enough to speculate further on this.
And I still think there is something more sinister with the ‘demonic’ faces than simple admixture with groups from the far east.
“It seems AS is trying to hint at a much older and better known link with the nomadic herding Khazars”
You are correct as usual.
“Round-faced chubby people like this have been classified as ‘Turanid’”
These look to me more like what you have been calling “reduced Cro-Magnon” faces, and I prefer your classification. When I think of archetypical Turanian faces (according to the Phi-proportions definition given above), I think of this:
http://i2.listal.com/image/3688138/600full-madonna.jpg
or this:
http://fabulousbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Joaquin-Phoenix1.jpg
or even this:
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Politics/images-6/david-duke.jpg
which are not as primitive, but are more demonic.
I think a weakness of using ordinary people’s faces as examples of racial type (the standard practice of 19th century physical anthropology) is that most people simply have lots of facial flaws from junk mutations, which distort whatever type might actually be underneath. For this reason I think racial type is best shown using at least fairly good-looking people, with relatively few facial flaws.
To demonstrate what I mean (and in an attempt to return the topic to JAPAN), here is a good drawing I found which captures the essence of the Jomon-Yayoi contrast:
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3brd3uBnw1qa061zo1_500.jpg
However, if we look at plain-looking people, it’s hard to see such a clear distinction because we are basically looking at 2000+ years’ worth of junk mutations piled on top of the original mixing (this is something that most HBD foppery fans seem to have totally forgotten about):
http://www.tonywublog.com/assets/images/2007/01/Crowd.jpg
On the other hand, if we look at actors who are much better-looking than average, it is easy to pick the types right out.
Heavily Jomon-leaning:
http://kumpulanfoto.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Foto-Aya-Ueto-6.png
http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Takayuki+Yamada+13+Assassins+Zebraman+2+Photocall+Y-OHVUhMuFdx.jpg
Heavily Yayoi-leaning:
http://imgsrc.baidu.com/forum/w%3D580/sign=b75b16ac37d3d539c13d0fcb0a86e927/637f8c82b9014a9088b270efa8773912b21beeb8.jpg
http://image.tin247.com/kenh14/090713133755-829-627.jpg
With the men, notice the difference in beard shapes.
For those of you familiar with the Poltergeist Report series, even the greatest rivalry between Spirit Detectives finds visual representation in a Jomon-Yayoi physical contrast:
http://25.media.tumblr.com/a3020c4d0dd72d5ae08d9963a6bb7d18/tumblr_mjqgmfM3Pa1r0ps8ko1_500.jpg
@JJ,
I agree that Turanid is a very vague subrace; it also seems as if anything that came out of Hungary was labelled “Turanid”, even if the individual wouldn’t have been in different nations.
“They’ve underwent the same selective pressure that caused the traits of a stereotypical Jew, maybe they share a more substantial relation?”
Where I come from, pure Dinarids are extremely rare, most being mainly mixed with other type. This is what “Dinarids” look like in my country: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Mircea_Badea.jpg He’s hardly even close to archetypal Dinarid.
I’ve noticed that the closer you get to the Dinaric Alps, the more purely Dinarid Dinarids get. Interestingly enough, these Dinarids tend to have similar eyes to the Turanids. So you’re probably right. By the way, what do you think of Heydrich in terms of phenotype? There’s something about the eyes (though I’m not claiming Heydrich was “demonic”).
@AS
I think I see what you mean. I think Kidman also has a similar face to the examples you’ve posted? http://www.freewebs.com/nicole_kidman/nicole-kidman.jpg Thoughts? (I mention this because I want to make connections to better understand what you mean.)
I don’t always have the best eye for such things, and I’m still trying to separate certain individuals based on the Aryan vs non-Aryan phenotype discussed in the human beauty page (some of the more tricky ones, not the obvious ones).
What do you think of Abe Hiroshi? http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/7540/ssss.jpg I see him leaning more towards Yayoi. Also, certain family members believed him to be a European after I showed them this picture: http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BNzc4Mjg2NTUzNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjAzODYxOA@@._V1._SY314_CR125,0,214,314_.jpg
Perhaps this would be a point to stress from on pages where we compare Aryan and Gentile profiles - Aryan profiles being similar irrespective of where they come from, while Gentile profiles having more variance?
I think this might also be a good cartoon of the differences between Yayoi and Jomon (and mixed types): http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-A8zHNEaDwQA/T6U0pMnskWI/AAAAAAAAEak/Pu8-DfmJ6cA/s1600/
“I think Kidman also has a similar face to the examples you’ve posted?”
Kidman’s face is hard to categorize; it is fairly moderate. Also she has done extensive cosmetic surgery, which makes it even more confusing:
http://files.sharenator.com/Nicole_Kidman_young_old_Celebrities_How_they_looked_young_and_how_they_look_now_old-s560x365-101120-580.jpg
“What do you think of Abe Hiroshi? I see him leaning more towards Yayoi.”
I agree. His odd looks might be partly due to his height? The guy immediately left of him (the one wearing the necktie) is also Yayoi-leaning but not as odd.
“certain family members believed him to be a European”
This is an example of the Eurocentrism mentioned on the Human Beauty page. When most people think “European face”, the face that appears in their minds is NEVER one like Hagrid’s:
http://img.likecinema.net/images/movie/player/Robbie_Coltrane_1280057016.jpg
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20091228174934/harrypotter/images/7/7c/Robbie_Coltrane_(Rubeus_Hagrid)_CoS_screenshot.JPG
Abe obviously looks nothing like Coltrane, so if Abe looks “European”, does that mean Coltrane looks “non-European”? What’s actually going on is this: when Eurocentrists say “European-looking”, they subconsciously mean “Aryan-looking”, oblivious to the Aryan look being completely different from the European look in reality. This is all part of the Zionist brainwashing which it is our mission to undo.
By the way, this topic need not be just about physical appearance; cultural manifestations are also important. One thing that annoys me about Japanese cuisine is that the kind of food served in Japanese restaurants (especially outside of Japan) is overwhelmingly Jomon-influenced (ie. extremely fancy), whereas a lot of Japanese home cooking is actually quite Yayoi-influenced (ie. much more down-to-earth), but unfortunately when most people think of Japanese food they think of the former rather than the latter. I always thought it would be a good idea for the Aryanist movement to promote a new kind of Japanese diner which specializes in inexpensive, “home”-style dishes rarely on the menu in mainstream Japanese restaurants. Here are some examples (I hope Airin is taking notes):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochazuke
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onigiri
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanakusa-no-sekku
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiyayakko
This same idea could also be adapted to other national cuisines.
@AS, Right, right, I agree that the old anthropology photos may have some use for quantity-based population studies, but not for our quality-based aims; and dusty, old black-and-white photos don’t have the best propaganda value! However, my range of knowledge is relatively limited to them at the moment.
@Decebal, I think Heydrich has a strange, extreme and ‘unharmonious’ look for sure, but would it be possible to mistake him for a ‘normal’ or unremarkable person? Regardless of his strange eyes, there’s a very neolithic physical component to him (although it is combined with non-neolithic elements, such as the nose and whatnot).
His extremely long skull is strange, considering his father was chubby-faced and had curly hair (a trait associated with Cro-Magnons). Thousands of years of genetic mixing can certainly cause some strange results.
—-
I would agree that Abe Hiroshi tends toward Yayoi, but disagree as to the reason why he is “European-looking.” I agree with what you say about Zionist brainwashing, but think there’s something more at work. I believe it is because his jaw is more well-defined and larger/more robust than the ‘Western’ stereotype of the Japanese people (that is to say, something I believe is caused by Jomon influence and not completely due to his height).
http://www.azsiafilm.hu/images/stories/2008/abehiroshia.jpg
http://cinedramas.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/abe-hiroshi.png
http://i2.listal.com/image/352612/600full-hiroshi-abe.jpg
Furthermore, there are even crackpot theories on the web that the Ainu are ‘secretly’ part or completely “white,” and it’s certainly not because they look Aryan. This photo comes up often in those discussions:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_kreyFY35nVY/R0_3DZIXzsI/AAAAAAAAAGI/JmiBn2OKINw/s1600-R/ainu1.jpg
He has a thick beard, lighter eyes, a higher bridged nose, and epicanthic folds which are not as ‘extreme’ as the stereotypical ‘Western’ perception of the Japanese. One explanation I’ve seen that makes sense for their perceived “whiteness” is that the Ainu are relatively ‘unspecialized’ Cro-Magnons (meaning the European Gentiles’ blood memory was probably at work spotting their paleolithic cousin).
Hopefully you can sort of see a similarity between the Ainu man and Coltrane (not a perfect comparison, but still):
http://drop.ndtv.com/albums/ENTERTAINMENT/harrypottercharacters/robbiecoltrane.jpg
-
On a separate train of thought, my “culturally conditioned” ‘Western’ eye was surprised when I first saw that the Japanese portrayed themselves in art as having long skulls and other Aryan features.
http://gcbmixedmartialarts.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/samurai-sword-fight1.jpg
http://02varvara.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/01-unknown-artist-the-mother-of-god-japanese-painting-on-silk-circa-1900-05.jpg?w=800
It intrigued me that they certainly didn’t believe themselves to have a “European look”!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gasshukoku_suishi_teitoku_k%C5%8Dj%C5%8Dgaki_%28Oral_statement_by_the_American_Navy_admiral%29.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Matthewperry.jpg
I also have a question for this part:
When you examine Yayoi culture and physical appearance there seems to be very little or no Gentile influence. Were the Yayoi relatively unmixed Aryans when they came to Japan and if so, how would this be possible, considering that they arrived there thousands of years after the initial Aryan migrations?
It is possible that the expedition to Japan was an intentional community project by Yue who felt disillusioned with the mainstream civilization in China by that time, which would mean conscious selection for like-minded people - UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY. You could, for example, imagine the Yayoi as a version of the Agriculturalists (Xu Xing’s movement - see Part 2) who merely chose to practice their ideology in Japan. The Agriculturalists would have been more Aryan than the average Yue, so by this reasoning the Yayoi could have been more Aryan than the average Yue. It’s no different than AA’s group being more Aryan than the average American - they’d be doing something wrong if they weren’t!
This guy is definitely Yayoi-leaning!:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Katamori_Matsudaira.jpg
Contrast him with these Jomon-leaning guys:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Hamaguchi_Osachi_1-1.jpg/480px-Hamaguchi_Osachi_1-1.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Nobuyuki_Abe_formal.jpg
Degeneracy in Asia vs Western vanity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRp6seV9pYs