Whites Must Develop, like the Jews, An Ethno-Religious Nationalist Movement
…
The Jewish people are a tribal people that believe that god chose them; and the Jewish people accepted their god and made a covenant with him.
The stories of the Torah — the first five books of the Bible document the stories of the Jews in the ancient near east and their interactions with other peoples and god himself. From the stories of their interaction with god they were able to extract the rules and regulations of how Jews are to live. The rules and regulations are categorised and explained in the Talmud and deeply shape how Jews think about the world. To be a Jew is to follow the Mosaic law — which means to follow the “game plan” so to speak set forward by the elders of their religion.
We see the strength of their philosophy and religion particularly after the war with the Roman Empire. The Jews fought a war with the Roman Empire that is meticulously documented by the Jewish-Roman historian Josephus. The main theme is that the Jews wanted an independent Palestine, which before the revolt was the property of the Roman Empire. The Jews lost the revolt and were cast out of the region and became a diaspora people.
That’s 2000 years ago that they became a diaspora people and less than a hundred years ago that they were awarded their own homeland. If they were able to survive for almost two-thousand years as a diaspora people and not only stay united as a people but come to predominance in nations built by other peoples, it must be said that Jews have sound survival strategies.
Yes, they do. So the noble response is for everyone else to work ever harder and join forces ever more broadly to ensure that Jews’ sound but ignoble survival strategies are unsuccessful. That is our response. But that is not your response.
Jews believe that their race, their tribal group, their religious community is about themselves in their totality are a nation. Their Jewish national identity supersedes any other national identity. That is to say, they are Jewish before German. Jewish before Italian.
That is a tribal identity.
This means that they are loyal to themselves rather than loyal to the geographical boundaries in which they live. To them they are the Jewish nation and since Jews are scattered all around the world, their “nation” is a transnational, borderless, invisible Jewish network that spans the globe.
A “transnational nation” is an oxymoron. What you are talking about is a transnational tribe, what earlier generations of writers accurately referred to as international Jewry.
What if we became white nationalists - meaning what happens if all white gentiles begin to see themselves as “white” and create a “nation” around their race - in the same way that jews have created a “nation” out of their tribal group.
Then the world will have another tribe (“international whiteness”?) doing to everyone else what Jews are already doing to everyone else. Except this tribe will be several orders of magnitude larger in number. Imagine Zionism multiplied hundredfold.
This is why every anti-Zionist has a duty to also be anti-”white”.
We should do exactly what they are doing and we shouldn’t feel bad about it.
That means that we should take from Judaism that which has given them strength as a people and the ability to persist in the diaspora for thousands of years.
We need to see ourselves as a race, religion, and nation.
That means we need to identify with our race (easy), but we also need a religion that unites us, a national (racial) identity, and the institutions of a traditional nation state that we can use to secure the existence of our people.
…
That’s why we need to take our moral compass from something outside of the mass culture. For Jews that is the Mosaic law. For us it would be our own religious law that has rules and regulations that are designed for us to get stronger as a group. It would differ entirely from the universalist morality of Christianity. An example of a religious rule: do not give charity to outgroups.
I am glad at least to see you admit that authentic Christianity indeed teaches moral universalism, and that hence you as a WN are not and can never be Christian, any more than a Jew can be Christian.
The holy book would be a book of stories that would become our history. It would include parables that would become the basis of our group strategy. It would also include commands from god on how we should behave.
An example would be: we talk about how in the “old time” we were convinced by an outgroup to bring foreigners into our midst and they exploited our humanitarian spirit and in the end we got attacked, abused, and displaced. The moral would be that we do not take our moral ideals from outgroups because that is a prime way to get manipulated. We must have our own religious moral code that we do not deviate from and it is entirely focused on the strength, wealth, prosperity, and fecundity of ourselves. We would say that it is not our place to care about other groups and uplift them. We want to uplift ourselves because that is the only way to abide by the one true law of nature: all organisms must first and foremost ensure their own existence and the existence of their species.
In short, you worship Yahweh exactly as Jews do.
What I’m saying is that we need to become like Jews because their strategy has not only allowed them to thrive but has brought them to prominence as a people.
I understand perfectly well what you are saying. In fact, I predicted more than a decade ago that you would be saying it.
My response is: you need to be treated like Jews.
How can you compare this to gangs ? Gangs live through their own rules and not the state laws
Hitler supported white minority rule in South Africa, that’s why he met with Oswald Pirow.
Diversity of what? And which native europeans exactly?
“Hitler supported white minority rule in South Africa, that’s why he met with Oswald Pirow.”
Adolf Hitler had no major interest in Oswald Pirow. It was Pirow which had interest in Hitler and met with the Führer in order to convince Germany to be less antijewish. After the II ww Pirow declared himself closer to Salazar than Hitler and made clear not to be antijewish.
This alone should demonstrate how much Pirow was not a National Socialist.
@KronosSS
The native Europeans who are ethnically European who have been resident on the European continent for thousands of years? You’re just another leftist who loves to hate on Europeans, exactly like the Jews do.
The Afrikaners who later implemented apartheid also supported Germany in the war against the British.
White means somebody of European descent, it’s not that hard to understand.
It’s no coincidence that having a mass coloured population in European cities that more crime and rape rates have skyrocketed.
Multiracial societies do not work, having different peoples who originate from different continents and environments mixed into one society brings nothing but trouble, look at the state of London, Berlin, Paris, Harlem and especially in Stockholm.
@MN
“look at the state of”
I do this often.
“London”
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-london-edition/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-islington-edition/
“Berlin”
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-germany/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-germany-contd/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-berlin-edition/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-logic-harvest/
“Paris”
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-france/
“Harlem”
Not Harlem but close enough:
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-brooklyn-edition/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-queens-edition/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-brooklyn-ii/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-brooklyn-review/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-brooklyn-iii/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/persistence-pays/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-new-york-medley/
“Stockholm”
Not Stockholm but close enough:
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-sweden/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-helsingborg-edition/
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-malmoe-edition/
“hate on Europeans, exactly like the Jews do.”
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/battle-lines-drawn/
http://aryanism.net/blog/information/backlash-herders/
@Manuel Nigao
>Hitler supported white minority rule in South Africa, that’s why he met with Oswald Pirow.
Certainly he was worried about Europe’s hegemony being superseded by Asia (if Goebbels is any indication), but it’s a stretch to say that he was even remotely sympathetic to Oswald Pirow.
The article “Fascist or opportunist?” by F.A. Mouton plainly indicates that “Pirow also left Hitler unimpressed after meeting him on 24 November 2023 at Berchtesgaden.”
And no wonder! He turned his back on Mosley the moment he ceased being influential and even dared to side with A. F. X. Baron’s group, which was opposed to Mosley’s Europeanism. Certainly Mosley lived in a world of unrealizable dreams, but it must not be overlooked that this is the case for most political planners. Not to defend Mosley or fascism in any way.
Pirow is a perfect match for the following description from Mein Kampf:
“All that is needed is that one man should strike out on a new road and then a crowd of poltroons will prick up their ears and begin to hope that some trifling gain may lie at the end of that road.
The moment they think they have discovered where the reward is to be reaped they hasten to find another route by which to reach the goal more quickly.
As soon as a new movement is founded and has formulated a definite programme, people of that kind come forward and proclaim that they are fighting for the same cause.”
Pirow only managed to curry favour with the theoretician Rosenberg.
@KronoSS
>Adolf Hitler had no major interest in Oswald Pirow. It was Pirow which had interest in Hitler and met with the Führer in order to convince Germany to be less antijewish.
Savitri, citing his report “Was the Second World War unavoidable?” (Hans Grimm has highlighted the obscurity of this report), adds that this was on the behalf of General Jan Smuts. So it was not even carried out on Pirow’s own initiative.
>After the II ww Pirow declared himself closer to Salazar than Hitler and made clear not to be antijewish. This alone should demonstrate how much Pirow was not a National Socialist.
Well said.
As for Salazar, it is indicated in Churchill’s memoirs that he had made his intentions known to flee to the Azores in the event of German aggression upon Portugal and that he was dependent on Britain for protection.
Both Goebbels and Ribbentrop note that both Portugal and Spain wavered indecisively between England and Germany, they were strictly concerned about being invaded and occupied by foreign nations. In the Table Talk, Hitler clearly draws a distinction between fascism and Franco’s regime.
“The native Europeans who are ethnically European who have been resident on the European continent for thousands of years? You’re just another leftist who loves to hate on Europeans, exactly like the Jews do.”
Speaking under a genetic point of view: “native Europeans” are made up by at least 3 ancestral components, or root races as you prefer to call. At least. And of these 3 components (but actually the thing is quite more complex) at least 2 are not native Europeans. So as you see it is not as simple.
About being leftist or rightist: these two categories were created after the “french” revolution, which actually was a jewish revolution. I am not interested in being herded in the “left” or “right” even because National Socialism is beyond these façades.
However: I do not “hate” Europeans, as I don’t “love” them just for the sake to be. How about all those degenerated Europeans that supports jews and their servants? Do you “love” or “hate” them?
“The Afrikaners who later implemented apartheid also supported Germany in the war against the British.
White means somebody of European descent, it’s not that hard to understand.”
About the first sentence: it’s not that simple. Actually some Afrikaners, including Pirow, tried to be “in the middle” and prevent a war between Germany and England.
When it was clear that England (or better: the zionist rulers of England) actually did want war at any cost, Afrikaners disappeared, without taking a precise position.
After the war, some right-wing parties emerged and the apartheid state was established. Just to make things clear: jews during apartheid literally flourished, and they were considered as “white”. This point alone should speaknclear about the distance between National Socialism and afrikaner right wing movements.
Yes, I know the basic classifications of white, black excetera which actually are very broad, generic, and don’t say anything specific about quality and spirituality.
For example, how do you consider baltic and alpine? As European sub-races or not? But it should be clear that baltics and alpines are clearly turanized types. So what?
“It’s no coincidence that having a mass coloured population in European cities that more crime and rape rates have skyrocketed.”
The whites or how you prefer to call that support jews and zionism? How fo you consider them?
“Multiracial societies do not work, having different peoples who originate from different continents and environments mixed into one society brings nothing but trouble, look at the state of London, Berlin, Paris, Harlem and especially in Stockholm.”
Yes but this is about quality, which in turn is surely racial, but not in the sense that you mean.
So I ask you: what about the thousands of alpine, cromagnoid and baltid that live in Stockholm? By your considerations those are whites, but metrically and racially they are turanized and giant racial types which live in Europe since millennia, yet they are quite different from Aryans according to an Aryanist racial doctrine. Do you want to preserve them too? Just because “blonde” hair and “blue” eyes which actually don’t say anything about a truly racial point of view? And the thousands of brachycephalic “whites” of Stockholm, clearly derived from turanians? How do you consider them?
“Both Goebbels and Ribbentrop note that both Portugal and Spain wavered indecisively between England and Germany, they were strictly concerned about being invaded and occupied by foreign nations. In the Table Talk, Hitler clearly draws a distinction between fascism and Franco’s regime.”
The authentic Italian fascism (not the Badoglio one but the true Fascism of the Social Republic) was anti-jewish and very close to National Socialism. I speak it knowing it since I am Italiam and I know personally Italian fascist veterans and one veteran of Italian Division of SS too.
So yes what you have said it is right. Plus Salazar offered many passports to jews to hide them from Axis.
About Franco: I don’t know if he really was a jew as this site says, so I ask to some of this Aryanist movement if they have more information about it.
Actually I know that Franco helped many SS and National Socialists to hide in Spain after the war. That being said, Franco also helped a lot of jews to hide from Germany during the war.
So actually I don’t think Franco was a jew. With this being said, it is clear that Franco wasn’t even a National Socialist. I have the impression he didn’t care for anything but having a sort of “authoritarian” State in Spain and nothing else. Neither a jew nor a NS.
Franco was not a Jew and he hated Jews like any good European should. This stupid site says he was a Jew is not true, he hated the Freesmasons too.
The Nordic, Alpine, East Baltic and Mediterranean races are sub-races of the white Aryan race. The Nordic race is the greatest race in history because it is the creator of the greatest civilization. Why do you think the National Socialists were obsessed with the race and it was constantly referenced to in literature. The NSDAP Race Office was there to promote Nordic racial interests.
“Franco was not a Jew and he hated Jews like any good European should. This stupid site says he was a Jew is not true, he hated the Freesmasons too.”
He didn’t care about jews. He was not antijewish.
“The Nordic, Alpine, East Baltic and Mediterranean races are sub-races of the white Aryan race”
You have mentioned two races very similar in craniometrical measures as well as body proportions (Nordic and Medirerranean) and two very similar between themselves (Baltic and Alpine). Yet, baltic and alpine are not two races of Aryan descent, like it or not. They are turanian/cromagnoid in origin
“The Nordic race is the greatest race in history because it is the creator of the greatest civilization.”
Surely it is a great race, as the Mediterranean race is as great as the Nordic one since they are two branches of the same Aryan race. Or would you deny the Roman Empire? Persia? Hittites?
“Why do you think the National Socialists were obsessed with the race and it was constantly referenced to in literature.”
They were interested in Aryanism, which is not the same as nordicism. See the allies of Germany: Japan, Italy, Romania, Norway, Croatia, India. This should be clear that Aryanism is quite different as Nordicism.
“The NSDAP Race Office was there to promote Nordic racial interests.”
Too simplistic. They promoted Aryanism; of course Germany promoted the Nordic branch of the Aryan race, while Italy promoted the Mediterranean branch of the Aryan race, which by some was called “Aryan-Roman, which basically has its origins in Troy
And in Iran, among other Aryan centres.
While neither Germany nor Italy promoted Alpine and Baltics. The judgment on baltic race was not so good, and the reason is that baltic race is basically turanian.
Anyway race is not only biology but also soul and spirituality, so metaphysical. It was a restoration of various Aryan elements in order to re-aryanize Europe again. I suggest you to read the Hitlerjugend manual (version of 1938) to have a clearer view.
Just a question for you: as a physical Aryan ideal, would you prefer the Iranian actress Mahtab Keramati or the russian Olga Kurylenko?
*Russian
I would like to contact some prominent members of this movement in order to speak them in private about some things regarding ancient civilizations and aryan, turanian, giant, excetera…
Who are the most experts in this ancient civilizations domains? Who has written the Aryan diffusion pages? I would like to exchange some things, I prefer in private.
Thank you.
@KronosSS:
“I would like to contact some prominent members of this movement in order to speak them in private about some things regarding ancient civilizations and aryan, turanian, giant, excetera…
Who are the most experts in this ancient civilizations domains? Who has written the Aryan diffusion pages? I would like to exchange some things, I prefer in private.”
Probably AS or JJ. Contacting them via the TTL forums is the best way:
https://trueleft.boards.net/board/12/activism
I would prefer an email contact actually, but thank you for having sent me a link.