European reactionary politics has become a runaway competition to see who can be the most pro-Zionist. The dynamic goes as follows:
1) Far-rightists constantly show off how much they love Jews and Israel in order to demonstrate they are not ‘Nazis’ in order to ‘legitimize’ their racism against anti-Zionist minorities.
2) Antifas constantly accuse the far-rightists of still being ‘Nazis’ underneath the surface. Antifas express their love for Jews and Israel even more than the far-rightists in order to ‘prove’ the above accusation.
3) Far-rightists repond by further escalating their pro-Zionism, and more strongly attacking the anti-Zionist minorities.
4) Antifas respond by further raising the bar for the ‘minimum acceptable level’ of pro-Zionism in order to keep the far-rightists below the bar.
5) Repeat from 3).
I had been predicting this development ever since far-rightists began to use Israel as a positive example of nationalist politics, which indeed it is (and which is why I will never be a nationalist), and ever since it became an unspoken requirement for every criticism of Islam to be closely accompanied by praise for Judaism or at least Judeo-Christianity. Indeed I had begun to worry ever since I saw “Western civilization” used as the rallying banner by both far-rightists and antifas, two groups which disagree sharply on what Western civilization is supposed to be - other than the point of unity for Jews and white Gentiles. But only recently have I managed to pin it down in a single term of vocabulary: Zionist Correctness (ZC), the replacement for Political Correctness (PC).
While many see that racism is on the rise, fewer see that there is emerging a consciousness that distinguishes between “good (ZC) racism” (against ‘Third World peoples’ ie. non-Jewish minorities) and “bad (un-ZC) racism” (against Jews). Whereas under Political Correctness people were socially pressured to avoid overt racism towards any minorities, now under Zionist Correctness people are gradually being given the social liberty to be as overtly racist as they wish to any non-Jewish minorities, on condition that they balance this out with fawning over Jewish interests. Furthermore, that non-Jewish minorities are admirably speaking out against the Jewish crime network is being used as evidence of their ‘backwardness’, which then makes racism against them even more ‘justified’ under Zionist Correctness.
The doctrine of Zionist Correctness, built upon the twin foundations of Holocaustian superstition and Western vanity, can be summed up thus: “It is good to be racist towards any ethnicity that doesn’t like Jews.” It is not difficult to figure out who benefits, and who suffers, from such a doctrine.
“Our authority will be the crown of order, and in that is included the whole happiness of man. The aureole of this authority will inspire a mystical bowing of the knee before it and a reverent fear before it of all the peoples.” - Protocols of Zion
Our enemies like to say that Political Correctness is killing Europe, but my response is that Zionist Correctness is turning Europeans into the worst kind of slaves - the kind that happily torments other slaves to gain petty favour from the slavemaster. And that is our enemies’ eternal strategy: to threaten us with supposed looming death and then offer us slavery as a way out. To such a strategy there can only be one response, the eternal, unchanging Aryan response to all threats: we do not fear death.
I believe that Zionist Correctness can be easily countered by using this very term to label it whenever we see it. Furthermore, we must explain that Political Correctness was merely a preamble to cover the switch to Zionist Correctness, and not inherently negative. (I would expect an Aryan who values honour and empathy to choose words fairly similarly to a PC-devotee who values politeness and inoffensiveness, except that the latter is acting while the former is sincere.) Time is short. We need to inject the terms “Zionist Correctness”, “Zionistically Correct”, and “ZC” into as many discussions as possible.
Alas, many amongst “anti-Zionist minorities” are motivated to fight Zionism only on their own turf. In Europe they prefer to use every advantage leftists and Jews offer against the native population. I was at first glad to meat a foreign Muslim student in my university, hoping for a natural ally. It has also crossed my mind a friendship with a non-European could provide an alibi against “racist” accusations. It turned out however he was ‘more Catholic than the Pope’; Anti-religious but only when it applies to Christianity; Supportive for recent Italian decision to ban crosses from public institutions but opposed to the Swiss decision concerning mosques. He even parroted liberal ideas about female rights but not when it comes to the issue of Burqua ban. I’s a natural response even amongst the most ardent anti-Zionist amongst Europeans to feel a bit like Vlad Tepes felt in a simmilar situation.