In so doing, they prove that they never sincerely cared about anti-racism as an ethical principle (or else they would continue to support anti-racism even though it logically implies anti-Jewishness):
Last weekend, I watched a film about those times, with its focal point the famous Rock Against Racism concert that took place in Hackney’s Victoria Park in 1978. It was called ‘White Riot’, in honour of my favourite band The Clash’s seminal song.
One thing struck me though.
While the film correctly showed the rising hatred towards the Black and Asian communities that the far-right sought to exploit as Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government came to power in 1979, the issue of anti-Jewish hate was much less focused on.
The concert was Rock Against Racism, not Rock Against Anti-Racism (anti-racism being what anti-Jewishness is, since Jewishness was invented by Jews themselves, not imposed upon them by someone else, in contrast to such categories as “black” and “Asian” which were imposed by “whites” (including Jews!) on people who had until then never thought of themselves as such).
Take Labour’s antisemitism crisis under Jeremy Corbyn.
You would be hard-pushed to find any self-declared anti-racists who actually accept that Labour antisemitism is real.
Because it is not real. Corbyn was not hostile to speakers of Semitic languages. In fact, weren’t Jews the ones complaining that Corbyn was too friendly with Hezbollah? Is the name “Hezbollah” not a name from a Semitic language? Then how could Corbyn possibly have been anti-Semitic?
And why were Jews complaining that Corbyn was too friendly with Hezbollah? Perhaps Jews are the ones who actually dislike speakers of Semitic languages (with the exception of Hebrew-speakers)?
Rather than standing alongside Jewish brothers and sisters who have complained bitterly for the past five years about their treatment by Labour, today’s self-proclaimed anti-racists have turned on an ethnic minority and accused them of making it all up.
No, you are not our “brothers and sisters”. (If you were, how come you are Jews and we are non-Jews?) This in itself is an example of you making it all up and expecting us to swallow it!
As for being an “ethnic minority”, how come colonial-era laws applied to “non-whites” were never applied to Jews? Answer: because many of the most efficient colonialists (a.k.a. “whites”) were Jews!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Disraeli#Foreign_policy
Disraeli had passed near Suez in his tour of the Middle East in his youth, and on taking office, recognising the British interest in the canal as a gateway to India, he sent the Liberal MP Nathan Rothschild to Paris to enquire about buying de Lesseps’s shares.[188] On 14 November 1875, the editor of the Pall Mall Gazette, Frederick Greenwood, learned from London banker Henry Oppenheim that the Khedive was seeking to sell his shares in the Suez Canal Company to a French firm. Greenwood quickly told Lord Derby, the Foreign Secretary, who notified Disraeli. The Prime Minister moved immediately to secure the shares. On 23 November, the Khedive offered to sell the shares for 100,000,000 francs.[191] Rather than seek the aid of the Bank of England, Disraeli asked Lionel de Rothschild to loan funds. Rothschild did so and controversially took a commission on the deal. The banker’s capital was at risk as Parliament could have refused to ratify the transaction.[192] The contract for purchase was signed at Cairo on 25 November and the shares deposited at the British consulate the following day.[191]
Disraeli told the Queen, “it is settled; you have it, madam!”[193] The public saw the venture as a daring British statement of its dominance of the seas.[193]
(By the way, this is the “ethnic minority” enemy author: https://www.thejc.com/image/policy:1.148818:1480962149/.jpg )
Returning to our “ethnic minority” (LOL) enemy author’s article:
Even worse, some of them have accused Jewish people of engaging in racism themselves when they have criticised Labour MPs, some of whom happen to be black.
Are Jews supposed to be allowed to get away with racism?
These same self-defined anti-racists were the ones unable to speak out when Sajid Javid, a British Muslim, was labelled a ‘coconut’ – a racist slur to someone deemed to be brown on the outside and white on the inside – because he was a senior minister with the Conservative Party.
We have Javid’s Zionism documented here:
https://trueleft.boards.net/post/188/
“Coconut” is an anti-racist slur, and one which Javid wholly deserves.
Or similarly, they were silent when former Labour MP Chuka Umunna was attacked with very same slur – mainly because he spoke out about Labour’s antisemitism problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuka_Umunna
Umunna was a member of the Labour Friends of Israel; along with Liam Byrne, he made an official visit to Israel in October 2012 as part of the LFI’s UK-Israel Economic Dialogue group.[22][23][24]
Thus Umunna too deserves to be called a “coconut”.
Returning to the enemy article:
Then there’s those REALLY outspoken anti-racists - people like Salma Yaqoob, a former parliamentary candidate for George Galloway’s Respect Party, who launched such a vicious campaign against British Muslim MP Naz Shah it left the Labour frontbencher feeling suicidal.
Or Jackie Walker – the former Labour Momentum member expelled from Labour over allegations involving antisemitism – who last week saw fit to share a social media post that read: ‘Dear BoD, Kier (sic) Starmer, Jewish Community Groups – if you want race conflict you are going the right way. Stop it now.’
Which left me thinking: If these people are seriously amongst the leaders of today’s ‘anti-racism’ movement, then that’s it - I’m out.
Indeed we are, and we will try our best to hit you with the door on your way out, hopefully in such a way that you are no longer capable of reproducing.
For more on Yaqoob:
“The concert was Rock Against Racism, not Rock Against Anti-Racism (anti-racism being what anti-Jewishness is, since Jewishness was invented by Jews themselves, not imposed upon them by someone else, in contrast to such categories as “black” and “Asian” which were imposed by “whites” (including Jews!) on people who had until then never thought of themselves as such).”
I feel the part of the sentence in bold to be correct, which would make British historian Arnold H. Toynbee an apologist for Jewry if the following passage is indeed from his book Reconsideration would it not?:
“Judaism is a development of the Pre-Exilic religion of Judah that was created in and by the Babylonian diaspora and was imposed by it on the Jewish population in Judaea. … There has also been the aim of converting the gentile world to the worship of Yahweh under the aegis of a world-empire centred on Eretz Israel and ruled by ‘the Lord’s Anointed’: a coming human king of Davidic lineage.” — Arnold J. Toynbee, Reconsiderations, p.486.
According to Toynbee there were Jews in the world before Judaism? I always found that an interesting quote because of precisely that statement. No one ever really seems to catch it though. Then we have a supposed quote from a Rothschild stating that Jews imposed Judeo-Christianity on non-Jews:
“But I can tell you, you are self-deceivers. You lack either the self-knowledge
or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the
Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we
gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity
but that we have imposed it upon you!
Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of
our proved historic offense. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow.
Suppose we admit the charge. What of it? Compared with what Paul the Jew of
Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheaval is a mere street brawl.
You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters
and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what
is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools,
your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day??” — Marcus Eli Ravage, was a Jewish writer who was the Rothschilds’ approved biographer. The following article appeared in THE CENTURY MAGAZINE, JANUARY 1928, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 346-350.