• Asked about Israeli influence on US foreign policy, an overwhelming 76% of Democrats, as compared to 20% of Republicans, said Israel has “too much influence.”
• Asked whether Israel is a racist country, 47% of Democrats agreed it is, as opposed to 13% of Republicans. Another 21% of Democrats didn’t know or were neutral (as opposed to 12% of Republicans), and only 32% of Democrats disagreed when asked if Israel is a racist country, as opposed to 76% of Republicans. (Overall 32% of those polled said Israel is a racist country.)
• Asked whether Israel wants peace with its neighbors, while an overwhelming 88% of Republicans said it does, a far lower 48% of Democrats agreed. Another 21% of Democrats didn’t know or were neutral (as compared to 7% of Republicans). And 31% of Democrats did not think Israel wants peace (as compared to 5% of Republicans).
• Asked whether they would be more likely to vote for a local politician who supported Israel and its right to defend itself, an overwhelming 76% of Republicans said yes, but only 18% of Democrats said yes. Meanwhile, only 7% of Republicans — but 32% of Democrats — said they would be less likely to support a local politician who backed Israel.
• Asked whether they would be more likely to vote for a local politician who criticized Israeli occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians, 45% of Democrats said yes, compared to just 6% of Republicans. Asked whether they would be less likely to vote for a local politician who criticized Israeli occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians, a whopping 75% of Republicans said yes, compared to just 23% of Democrats.
• Asked whether the US should support Israel or the Palestinians, a vast 90% of Republicans and a far lower 51% of Democrats said Israel. Another 8% of Republicans and 31% of Democrats were neutral. And 18% of Democrats said the Palestinians, compared to 2% of Republicans. Overall, 68% of those polled said the US should support Israel, and 10% said the US should support the Palestinians.
• Asked about which side they themselves support, 88% of Republicans and 46% of Democrats said they were “pro-Israeli” while 4% of Republicans and 27% of Democrats said they were “pro-Palestinian.”
• Asked if settlements are an impediment to peace, 75% of Democrats and 25% of Republicans agreed.
…
He also predicted that Israel is in for “a lot more trouble” from the BDS (Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions) campaign. Once they had been informed about the BDS campaign, 19% of respondents supported it — 31% of Democrats and 3% of Republicans. And, stressed Luntz, 60% of America’s opinion elites said they were not familiar with BDS. “Israel is already having trouble with BDS, and Americans don’t even know what it means. Can you imagine how bad it will get?”
He also foresaw a looming battle in the US over foreign aid to Israel. Some 33% of Democrats and 22% of Republicans, his poll found, were upset that “Israel gets billions and billions of dollars in funding from the US government that should be going to the American people.”
Luntz also asked whether respondents see anti-Semitism as a problem in the US. Overall, 58% agreed with the idea that anti-Semitism is a problem in America (57% of Republicans and 64% of Democrats), compared to 28% who disagreed. “Non-Jews recognize the problem, even if some Israelis want to minimize it,” he said.
Ironically, the poll also found, 50% of Democrats and 18% of Republicans (and 36% of all respondents) agreed with the proposition that “Jewish people are too hyper-sensitive and too often label legitimate criticisms of Israel as an anti-Semitic attack.”
What do you think, Donald? Do you have a strategy to rally all the percentages marked in bold? Anyway, please repost this data over at NCP for easy reference (add your own analysis if you wish), and most importantly to let everyone know that we were correct all along in our predictions about where the popular support for anti-Zionism would be coming from.
Speaking of Corrie, a tribute page to her at NCP would be a nice addition when you have time.
yes, you’re right. the democrats are less pro-zionist than right-wing republicans.
but make no mistake, when it comes to zionism, the democrat or republican LEADERS are the same!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-LAYJvY0BXDc/VOoKHzPqbtI/AAAAAAAAErQ/w3d7iAoTTLs/s1600/165423_10151340433476540_1392289487_n.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lONVHRLq4NU/VXQe8fsKGNI/AAAAAAAAGA8/LnWfXeWtkBI/s1600/jewish20obama2023jul8.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-fkQkwHbZKF4/VXQecD1HAzI/AAAAAAAAGAs/R-JCmoQm8jk/s1600/bill-clinton-skullcap.jpg
I’ve recently found a few articles in Australian newspapers online that expose the pro-Israel’s lobby group’s influence on Australian foreign policy. We probably need to work on something for this for the ARNM site too.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/09/bob-carr-gillard-foreign-policy-jewish-donors
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-09/bob-carr-lashes-out-at-melbourne-pro-israel-lobby/5379074
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/bob-carrs-texts-to-gillard-reveal-extraordinary-influence-proisrael-lobby-had-on-former-pm-20140409-36dys
I’m glad to see this come up for the NCP.
I think that the Rachel Corrie story being spread would be an excellent way to increase those percentages, as well as cement the opinions of those already critical of Israel. The Right will never change, and will side with Israel, with responding how “Irresponsible” the protesters were; funny how responsibility never occurred to them as they were trying to illegally bulldoze Palestinian houses. Nonetheless, this story should be in the forefront of the public mind, as to bring more people to a sense of Israel awareness, if not Jew awareness.
I will add the data to the site as soon as I can.
It is very good that America is slowly but surely turning against Israel. However, Zionism won’t just let go of their primary guard dog and financial base. Bernie Sanders (Jew) is polling high for the 2016 presidential election. He is a “radical” (as described by the press) and a socialist. Thus, he will likely attract large numbers of people that any Aryanist would hope to have as support.
Google search: https://www.google.com/#q=Bernie+Sanders+polls
“The Jew artfully enkindled that innate yearning for social justice which is a typical Aryan characteristic. Once that yearning became alive it was transformed into hatred against those in more fortunate circumstances of life. The next stage was to give a precise philosophical aspect to the struggle for the elimination of social wrongs. And thus the Marxist doctrine was invented. By presenting his doctrine as part and parcel of a just re-vindication of social rights, the Jew propagated the doctrine all the more effectively.” ~Hitler
why my comment isn’t published?
On the brighter side of things and in line with AS’s post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMzvgCLtCG8
More and more Americans are starting to doubt Israel’s massive PR campaign in light of events such as the USS Liberty attack. That news report is from a PC news site and it outright accuses Israel of a war crime, showing that Politically Correct is moving away from ZC, which is being ever more exposed as a lie.
@Thor
If you have more than two links in your post it gets put into the moderation queue for the site admin.
(Oh, didn’t understand the link rule either.)
I’ve recently found a few articles in Australian newspapers online that expose the pro-Israel’s lobby group’s influence on Australian foreign policy. We probably need to work on something for this for the ARNM site too. It seems a similar thing is happening here in Australia. I’ve also set up a page on FB: “Jewish Influence in Australia,” to begin to collate references that I find such as these articles as well as past history.
There is much written about Jews in America (media, politics, cultural, etc) but not so much about Australia, at least that’s not easy to find.
I like Rachel Corrie, she was a great activist against j*ish oppression in Palestine.
“Speaking of Corrie, a tribute page to her at NCP would be a nice addition when you have time.”
It would be indeed well to make a page about her, to let people remember how people like Corrie died protecting the right people.
@Miecz Elizejski
Something we should all get behind.
“Potential 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate:
Cynthia McKinney”
http://2016.presidential-candidates.org/McKinney/
Here is a graph I capped sometime back in 2014, can’t remember from where:
http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/israel-attitudes.png
We need to encourage positive relations between the US and its New World neighbours in such a way that the US gravitates towards the standard New World view towards Israel, so that the New World as a whole becomes a solid anti-Israel geopolitical bloc. This should also be an NCP objective. Of course, it’s going to be difficult now that the mainstream media is increasingly turning the ZC focus against Latin American countries in general and Mexico in particular, promoting first Ann Coulter and now Donald Trump in just the last few months.
(We used to have some South American contacts such as GBrazilK and InkaCondor, but we haven’t heard from them for some time. I wonder how they are doing? If you guys are reading this, please contact us!)
@NS
If McKinney runs, we should definitely support her. But at the moment, there are no reliable signs that she herself is interested in running again. If you want, you could try contacting her directly and persuading her to run!
@AS: My mistake, I must have heard a re-broadcast of the 2008 campaign, and then confused the two, the re-broadcast and the current website.
If you want, you could try contacting her directly and persuading her to run!
Indeed! Will do!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cynthia-Mckinney-for-President-2016/208736085917393
Interesting comment under the first post, there is intelligent life out there yet!
I suspect Ms. McKinney’s foreign policy would be much better than B. Sanders. I’d like to hear her take on Russia and the US policy of Full Spectrum Dominance.
Alex Jones’ LLC is also turning it up a notch in regards to ‘whites’ vs. others, demonizing the Pope, and immigration from South America as of late. Perfect timing.
Pope Says He Supports ‘State of Palestine’
http://mashable.com/2014/05/25/pope-francis-palestine-israel/
@AS: “We need to encourage positive relations between the US and its New World neighbours in such a way that the US gravitates towards the standard New World view towards Israel, so that the New World as a whole becomes a solid anti-Israel geopolitical bloc.”
Israel is considered to be part of European bloc by the West, and had it not been part of European (western) bloc, Russia would have been Israel’s main supporter today.
The US & the UK will never break from Israel!
We need to encourage positive relations between the US and its New World neighbours…
The US public are already positive toward their New World neighbours, but the US is not controlled by her people, so what exactly do you mean?
Finally something positive in the USA for change! However small!
Cynthia McKinney certainly knows the score as she was on that waylaid boat to break the Gaza blockade.
@Numinous Sun
“The US & the UK will never break from Israel!”
There are Aryanists, as well as non-affiliated anti-Zionists, in both countries working toward breaking away from Israel. Please have more faith in them. Otherwise why are we here?
“The US public are already positive toward their New World neighbours, but the US is not controlled by her people, so what exactly do you mean?”
Negative opinions against other New Worlders (especially those from Latin America) are widespread in the US (e.g. http://nbclatino.com/2012/09/12/poll-1-out-of-3-americans-think-most-hispanics-are-undocumented/). That those who control the country have something to do with this is another matter. The point is that just as we have promoted good relations between non-Muslims and Muslims for strategic reasons, we should be doing the same between Americans and other New Worlders (immigrants or not), as AS’s graph indicates. And, for ethical reasons, we should be promoting good relations between all people.
Furthermore, note that while many Americans, and Canadians too, travel to Latin America, they do so to go to nice beaches and for the weather, for the main part (which is why the Caribbean is such a big hit); but if they want to travel to “experience culture and history”, they usually go somewhere in Europe. This is because most of them see themselves as culturally European (and hence as Westerners). Creating closer ties between the different peoples of the New World will help us move away from Western Civilization and towards something different - the real New World Order (pun intended).
By the way, I don’t know what travel patterns are like for people from Latin American countries. If anybody has more information, please do post it.
@Hashtali
A lot of people don’t visit other Central or South American countries for culture because they consider it to be third world, however a lot of ‘non-Hispanic’ left-winged Americans I know liked going to countries like Peru, Chile, and Ecuador over old world countries to experience the culture or environment, perhaps going to Western European for identity culture this is a Right-winged attitude?
“By the way, I don’t know what travel patterns are like for people from Latin American countries. If anybody has more information, please do post it.”
For Immigration, or Tourism?
@Hashtali
Something like this?
http://worldjourney.net/phs/ppts/Ch03_Presentation_files/slide0009_image087.jpg
Do you mean what it is like to travel here per country?
-
Also take a look at this
http://sg.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-AQ274_REMIT_20080430185323.gif
@Alex Alexander
I think US tourism to Europe is more of a “posh” attitude. It seems to me that many Americans want to travel to Europe because they perceive the culture, scenery, and attractions to be more ‘high class’ than American or other New World attractions. (For example, one of the most popular New World tourist attractions are the Mayan ruins-not very glitzy or glamorous compared to 5-star Paris hotels with a view of the Eiffel Tower). They want to experience the ‘sophisticated’ cities they see in old movies and be able to travel all over the world just like movie stars and the characters they play. I think non-rich people in the US would rather save up for a “once in a lifetime” trip to Europe to experience what Hollywood has peddled to them, than take numerous smaller trips in the New World.
I’ve also heard of Americans going to South America for missionary work, although this is obviously limited to Catholics.
@JJ
>I’ve also heard of Americans going to South America for missionary work, although this is obviously limited to Catholics
I know it’s all semantic but when I was younger and going to church with my parents, our Assembly of God church - as well as another Four-Square church I went to - organized many missionary trips to South America. Of course, the countries in South America they visited were much more north than the main continent.
However, I feel the motivations behind any missionary trip to South America are fueled by the whole First World-Third World way of thinking, in order to westernize those countries more and expose them to Judeo-Chrsitianity - which is obviously ignoble.
I do agree with your perception on the American attitude on travel to Europe. Ethnocentrism has led to Americans holding onto their European roots, and wanting to explore them further. If I had a nickel for every time I heard “I’m part x, part x, and part x,” I’d be rich. Even more so is the number of European descended Americans that claim they have some abstract fraction of Native American blood, as if having part native blood somehow absolves them of “White Guilt.” Both of those concepts are hilariously ridiculous, and I find myself puzzled as to the reason they even exist.
I would love to see a united New World, as we have very fertile land pretty much every where. Unity of the New World founded by national socialist perspective would be the first big step to victory, as most arable land would be converted to Food Land, and I’d love to see that happen in my lifetime
@Donald
“Even more so is the number of European descended Americans that claim they have some abstract fraction of Native American blood”
I mention this phenomenon here:
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/to-the-people-of-atlantis/
though I myself am somewhat more sympathetic to it. I believe those who claim Native American blood without substantiation are basically well-meaning. wishing to emphasize their American-ness, but are merely going about it in a clumsy way. These people should be more likely to support our vision for the New World than average, so let us not make fun of them.
By the way, Donald, I suggest you add the NCP blog to the ‘Website’ row when you post comments, so that your name becomes a clickable link leading to NCP (just like Isaac’s name is a clickable link leading to ARNM). This will give your blog more visibility and let everyone know you are in charge of it.
@Donald
I think that we should encourage people who fill out applications or censuses that ask for your ‘race’ or ethnicity should simply put “other”, this should slowly remove the concept of ethnicity in America, and remove silly ethnocentric demographics, What do you think?
@AS
I can understand that. I’ll keep that in account whenever I come across this phenomenon.
I also added the website to my name. Thank you.
@Alex
That is the general consensus on the ethnicity choice with anything a person is to fill out. If the ethnicity is optional, I would much rather them leave the boxes blank, as to show that we are anti-ethnocentric.
If any census is to be had in a post-revolution country, however, we would of course not even think of having that question.
@AS
So my girlfriend brought up today the city of Arcosanti, which looking into it sounds like a National Socialist intentional community. Have you ever heard of it?
Not previously, but you could ask our intentional community expert AA to look into it. Ask Hashtali to put you in contact with AA if you are not already.
@AS If you wanted to look at it yourself, they have a website, http://www.arcosanti.org
@Donald
Well I can tell you I absolutely dislike urban sprawl, I think it is a waste of everything, in this country we have empty cities, and we keep building these hideous suburbs, Sometimes they are waste of construction because people don’t buy the homes, or they go under foreclosure quickly resulting in empty houses.
This being said, What are good solutions to urban sprawl? - I was thinking that cities with empty buildings should pave way to build new buildings or remodel, Also remodel the whole city infrastructure, then halt all urban sprawl. I think this is the best way to combat urban sprawl.
I would need to look more into the Arcosanti project, to form a proper conclusion about it.
THE BASIC LAYOUT FOR CITIES OUGHT TO BE CONSTITUTED BY THREE CONCENTRIC ZONES, INCREASING IN DENSITY, AND IN HEIGHT, THE CLOSER TO THE CENTRE/DECREASING IN DENSITY, AND IN HEIGHT, THE FURTHER FROM THE CENTRE:
THE FIRST INNERMOST ZONE WOULD BE THE URBAN NUCLEUS, MAINLY COMPRISED OF OVERLY TALL SKYSCRAPERS; IN THIS ZONE WOULD BE LOCATED THE FINANCIAL, CORPORATE, COMMERCIAL, AND PUBLIC, DISTRICTS.
THE SECOND MIDDLE ZONE WOULD BE THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE, COMPRISED OF SPACIOUS CAMPUSES, AND RELATIVELY LOW AND WIDE BUILDINGS.
THE THIRD OUTERMOST ZONE WOULD BE THE SUBURBAN ZONE, COMPRISED OF FARMS, AND HOUSES; THIS ZONE WOULD BE THE LESS DENSELY DEVELOPED/POPULATED, AND THE LOWEST ONE.
@RY
I see! This should distribute urban land quite evenly.
-
I was thinking that a well-spoken Spanish speaker here on Aryanism, Should write articles in Spanish, and Translate the website in Spanish as well, even handle Spanish contacts, this will hopefully attract Spanish new comers all over the word, I see this as a very tactical option because Spanish is the 2nd most spoken language in the world, However I do not speak Spanish, So we need someone that does.
@Alex Alexander
I KNOW SPANISH, AND I WOULD BE WILLING TO BE OF ASSISTANCE IN THAT ENDEAVOUR.
¿Cómo se escribe en español ? Estoy usando un traductor. ¿Puede dar un ejemplo de un párrafo traducido del aryanismo .
@Alex Alexander
EXEMPLUM GRATIA:
>”Physical appearance depends on how closely a person represents a racial archetype. Plain people are nowhere near any archetype; striking people approximate some archetype. Which archetype we aspire towards reflects our racial idealism. We can recognize nearness to an archetype, hence have our attention drawn to that person among a crowd of plainer people, but if we dislike the archetype itself, we will feel disgust rather than admiration. This is no different than when we read a well-written essay promoting ignoble ideas; the skillful language only adds to our revulsion towards the barbaric content. Only those whose type approximate an archetype that we like will be found beautiful by us. As Aryanists, we like Aryan archetypes and dislike Jewish and Gentile archetypes.”
>LA APARIENCIA FÍSICA DEPENDE EN QUE TAN CERCANAMENTE UNA PERSONA REPRESENTE UN ARQUETIPO RACIAL. LAS PERSONAS INDISTINGUIDAS ESTÁN MUY LEJOS DE CUALQUIER ARQUETIPO; LAS PERSONAS NOTABLES SE APROXIMAN A ALGÚN ARQUETIPO. HACIA QUÉ ARQUETIPO ASPIREMOS REFLEJA NUESTRO IDEALISMO RACIAL. NOSOTROS RECONOCEMOS LA CERCANÍA A UN ARQUETIPO, ASÍ NUESTRA ATENCIÓN ES DIRIGÍDA HACIA ESA PERSONA DE ENTRE UNA MULTITUD DE PERSONAS MENOS NOTABLES, PERO SI NOS DESAGRADA EL ARQUETIPO EN SÍ, SENTIREMOS AVERSIÓN EN VEZ DE ADMIRACIÓN. ÉSTO NO ES DIFERENTE DE CUANDO LEEMOS UN ENSAYO BIEN ESCRITO PROMOVIENDO IDEAS INNOBLES; EL LENGUAJE DIESTRO SÓLO AGREGA A NUESTRA REVULSIÓN HACIA EL CONTENIDO BARBÁRICO. SÓLO AQUELLOS LOS QUE SU TÍPO SE APROXIME A UN ARQUETIPO QUE NOS AGRADE SERÁN CONSIDERADOS BELLOS POR NOSOTROS. COMO ARYANISTAS, NOS AGRADAN LOS ARQUETIPOS ARYOS, Y NOS DESAGRADAN LOS ARQUETIPOS JUDÍOS, Y GENTILES.
OBVIOUSLY, IF IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS “TRANSLATION PROJECT” WILL BE REALIZED, AND I AM ELECTED TO AID IN THE TASK, I WOULD RESPECT THE SET LETTERCASE.
>”LA APARIENCIA FÍSICA DEPENDE EN QUE TAN…”
I MEAN: “LA APARIENCIA FÍSICA DEPENDE DE QUE TAN…”
APOLOGIES.
OBVIOUSLY, IF IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS “TRANSLATION PROJECT” WILL BE REALIZED, AND I AM ELECTED TO AID IN THE TASK, I WOULD RESPECT THE SET LETTERCASE.
Why do you write in all caps anyway?
I think a Spanish translation would be a very good idea. People have translated the site before, but using google translate and without even bothering to translate text in the various images on the site - a lame attempt. Moreover, there is a lot more potential in the Hispanophone world, which tends to be politically radical, than the Anglo world which has been the biggest supporter of Jewry and Capitalism over the last 300 years.
@AW
“Why do you write in all caps anyway?”
I write in all caps sometimes I’m having a “manic episode”.
Your screen-name is “Andalucian Warrior” Are you from Andalusia, If so do you speak Spanish?
@RY
Send a contact form to Hashtali so he can approve the project.
http://aryanism.net/about/contact/
@Andalucian Warrior
>”Why do you write in all caps anyway?”
FOR BOTH, AESTHETIC, AND MORAL, REASONS:
AESTHETIC REASONS: I LIKE HOW UPPERCASE LETTERING LOOKS, AND I DETEST LOWERCASE LETTERING.
MORAL REASON: UPPERCASE IS THE ORIGINAL LETTERFORM; THE LATIN ALPHABET, AND THE GREEK ALPHABET ALSO, FROM WHICH THE FORMER DERIVES, WERE CREATED IN UPPERCASE; IT WAS ONLY CENTURIES AFTER THEIR RESPECTIVE CREATIONS THAT LOWERCASE WAS PRODUCED AS A PARTIAL CONSEQUENCE OF INDOLENCE ENGENDERED BY GENERAL DECADENCE, THEREFORE, TECHNICALLY, LOWERCASE LETTERING IS A DEGENERATION.
@Alex Alexander
>”Send a contact form to Hashtali so he can approve the project.”
JUST LIKE THAT; I SUBMIT A FORM, AND THE “TRANSLATION PROJECT” IS APPROVED?
I AM A “STRANGER”; AM I NOT GOING TO BE JUDGED BEFORE I UNDERTAKE SUCH CRUCIAL MASSIVE TASK?
IF I AM INDEED SELECTED FOR THE TASK, WILL I BE WORKING WITH SOMEONE ELSE?
HOW WILL THE WORKING PROCESS FUNCTION?
IF I AM NOT SELECTED, WILL THE “PROJECT” BE CANCELLED, OR WILL SOMEONE ELSE BE CHOSEN?
@RY
Of course not; I don’t have too many details because I do not handle contact forms; but I do think he would discuss with you on the details and check if you are qualified, He will go over all of those questions in the contact form, I don’t coordinate projects on Aryanism, However I can give ideas and set up websites, I helped setup the websites for both ARNM and FZS, so if you want to ask me some questions send a contact form to ask Hashtali for my contact information, and we can go over the planned project a bit.
To be fair, RY, I am pretty young in Aryanism too. You just have to show you’re willing to learn, and you have the will to be noble. That’s all you need to do.
>Your screen-name is “Andalucian Warrior” Are you from Andalusia, If so do you speak Spanish?
No to both of those questions, actually. I call myself that only because I chose the screenname during an argument with an Islamophobe.
@AW
Ha! A lot of people here think you are from Andalusia because of your screen name, good that you clarified that.
-
This enrages me especially in my own home state.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/07/21/owner-declares-gun-store-muslim-free-costello-bts-nr.cnn
Well, my name doesn’t refer to the modern region of Andalucia. It refers to the historical Islamic state which covered much of Iberia.
“I am pretty young in Aryanism too. ”
Speaking of this, I corrected my ideological flaws in my discussions from November 2014 to February 2015, I will make those mistakes nevermore.