Yes, really:
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15448/france-jews-murder
Sarah Halimi, a 66-year-old Jewish woman, is thrown from her third-floor balcony or window. Her body lands in the building’s courtyard. Her murderer first had tortured her. Neighbors had heard screams and called the police. Nine officers came, but when they heard through the door a man shouting “Allahu Akbar”, they ran downstairs to wait for reinforcements. When Kobili Traoré finally surrendered, he said, “I killed the sheitan” (Arabic for “Satan”). While torturing his victim, he said, he had recited verses from the Qur’an, and the Qur’an had “ordered him to kill a Jew”.
Except he killed almost certainly a post-menopausal Jew (ie. zero reproductive potential remaining), in other words he achieved precisely nothing in terms of long-term demographic attrition. Fortunately, there is a considerable silver lining to the story with respect to legal precedent:
He said he had spent the previous day in a nearby mosque. He was placed in a mental institution, where he told the psychiatrist who examined him that he smoked marijuana.
…
That court, issuing its decision on December 19, declared that Kobili Traoré had “voluntarily killed” Sarah Halimi and had thereby committed a murder. The court also acknowledged the “aggravating circumstance of anti-Semitism,” but added that due to a “temporary abolition of discernment,” the murderer was “criminally irresponsible,” could not be tried, and therefore had to be released.
The president of the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions (CRIF), Francis Kalifat, remarked that “an anti-Semitic murder could become the only murder excused by the courts on the basis of the use of drugs, while in all other cases, drugs are an aggravating factor.”
…
Another lawyer for the victim’s family, Gilles-William Goldnadel, expressed his “disgust,” and said that “if the victim were not Jewish and if the murderer were not a Muslim, the decision could have been different.”
A member of parliament, Meyer Habib, commented that the court’s decision was a “judicial scandal never seen in France” and added that there is “an obvious desire on the part of the French judiciary system to exonerate an anti-Semitic Islamic murderer”. “Releasing an anti-Semitic murderer without trial sends a horrible signal to French Jews,” he said.
That’s the point.
A psychiatrist, Claude Bloch, noted that the ruling may “allow anyone with fierce hatred for Jews to murder them with impunity.”
That’s the point.
On January 5, French Jewish organizations organized a protest to demand that the judiciary reverse its decision. All the French political organizations remained silent; none joined the protest. The mainstream media observed virtually a total silence on the subject. Only Jews came to the demonstration.
We are winning in France, in no small part thanks to Operation Gaddafi:
http://trueleft.boards.net/thread/52/operation-gaddafi-eu
All we need to do is keep it going:
http://trueleft.boards.net/post/2017/
keep Le Pen out of power:
http://trueleft.boards.net/thread/302/rn
and victory will be ours.
In an open letter, the Chief Rabbi of France, Haim Korsia, asked the Minister of Justice, Nicole Belloubet, to intervene, in order not to “deprive citizens of one of the most precious rights in a democracy: the right of appealing to justice to shed light on an act of violence and hatred.” He said that he “usually compels himself not to comment on court decisions,” but he suggested in this case, “a serious breach of trust.” He added: “Should we deduce that any drugged individual would have a license to kill Jews?”
In a fairer world, drug use should not be a prerequisite to get an Ahimsa license.
Muslim anti-Semitism has long been ignored in France. The only book in French devoted to the subject — A Survey on Muslim Anti-Semitism: From Its Origins to the Present Day by Philippe Simonnot — actually justified Muslim anti-Semitism by claiming that the Jews living in the Muslim world had supported European colonizers, and adding that Jews support Israel, a “new colonial enterprise based on Muslim land theft.”
These claims are 100% true and easily verifiable.
(On the Aryan origins of hemp cultivation:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4253540?seq=1
http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-2/
Hemp was primarily a textile crop. Whether or not they also smoked it is unknown.)
A Jewish newspaper, Times of Israel, stated:
“France’s half-a-million-plus Jewish community has voiced increasing concern with a rise in anti-Semitic acts that have seen thousands of Jews leave for Israel.”
This man was so high on drugs that he was blind to how his actions will be used to further colonial violence against the poor Palestinians.
But what else could he do? Turn a blind eye? A citizen’s arrest?
If Jews really want these retaliations to stop, then they need to stop being racist, stop lying, and stop provoking, period.
“If Jews really want these retaliations to stop, then they need to stop being racist, stop lying, and stop provoking, period.”
Two-thousand plus years of this shit, way more if we count the Jewish roots as being Turanian. Humanity constantly attempts to tell Jews why the rest of humanity will eventually end up hating them too if they continue with their foolishness, yet they never listen, they never stop.
Yahweh and your Rabbis did not predict the internet, nor create it. That should be the biggest hint to Jews to stop, but I guess they are intent on learning the hard way….
Muslim anti-Semitism has long been ignored in France.
It’s origins have been ignored.
Muslim anti-Semitism …claiming that the Jews living in the Muslim world had supported European colonizers, and adding that Jews support Israel, a “new colonial enterprise based on Muslim land theft.”
French Jews were against the independence of Algeria. The OAS that tried to kill DeGaulle did so through Mossad assitance. Jews from the newly independent Algeria went to France, the imperial heartland, thereby continuing to show their sentiments as not really Algerian.
JFK also openly supported Algerian independence, as early as 1957, and Jews were uneasy with him. The excellent book Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper details all of this.
Ryan Dawson is a rightist I believe, but not of the BS Gentile type.
Good interview with Michal Collins Piper here though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-IWzHfpstg&list=PL03pOsugHihw7WfJ2tYMPzThQd1TQOiQe&index=107&t=157s
When I first got into Anti-Zionist activism I used to listen to Piper’s Podcast where he used to read from his book Final Judgement. It’s a shame he got tangled up with the likes of Mark Glenn, who ended up supporting Trump. Piper had died shortly before 2016 I think, and I don’t believe he would have supported Trump himself. I often wonder if Glenn would have supported Trump had Piper still been around….
It was a sad day for Anti-Zionism when Piper died.