The problem of scapegoating is important to how we view ourselves and our enemy and is itself detrimental to Aryanism. Scapegoating Jews, or anyone other group, is the result of a partial or complete denial of the fallibility of Gentiles. Aryanists should easily be capable of discerning between what is the result of the Jews and what is the result of ourselves.
Many of us will have experiences to draw from where scapegoating has been the cause of some obscene claims. When anti-Jewish websites attempt to write articles on certain periods of history, or certain groups from history, nearly all blame the smallest of perceived discrepancies on nothing short of total Jewish control of the subject-matter. Examples I have come across are too numerous to fully list. The most notable are claims that “Jewish banksters” caused the Dark Ages through contraction of the money supply. This is simply, again, confusion between actual Jewish power and Gentile fallibility. Some find it almost inconceivable that the world would not be perfect if the Jew no longer had any power; and, subsequently, blames any part of history that is not of sufficient quality, in whatever form and by whatever subjective means, to be thoroughly Jewish. Others that are more well-known include: the purported Jewish ancestry of nearly every historical figure; the Jewish origins of many of the modern institutions (Vatican, Banks, etc.); and the long list of perceived Jewish ideas and concepts. This is nothing more than the result of burdening the fools of the anti-Jewish movement with too much knowledge and a shortage of wisdom.
The material relationship between Jews and Aryans is one of parasitism. However, the spiritual relationship; the relationship which is most evident throughout history, is a separate phenomenon. While the Jews themselves have been quite successful in their destruction of; first the Aryan, and then the Gentile spirit, the problem that is the essence of their success that has existed long before the two groups had any contact of note, is the Aryan himself. It has been said before, but without the necessary emphasis. While the Jews have cleverly exploited Gentile weaknesses, it is not unthinkable that even without the existence of the Jews, Gentiles would follow a similar path. For this reason, it should be evident that most of history is not the result of the plotting of some clever Jews, but in-group fallibility. Every Aryan civilisation has caused its own degradation. In this way, the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade should not be viewed any differently to the Slave trades of Rome, nor should any figure or period with negative connotations be blamed on the influence of the Jews.
The core of this scapegoating problem is, as stated above, a problem of the inclusion of the insufficiently intelligent within the intellectual ranks of this anti-Jewish movement. For the Aryanist movement, we should aim for action and not moribund, relentless; and worst of all, pointless, pseudo-inquiry and rejection of actual authority. This is required, for the reason the unintelligent are included amongst the intellectuals is primarily because there is nothing to do in the anti-Jewish movement but speculate on this or that historical or contemporary person, era or idea. This is opposed to any group which supports the concept of a victory by informing, that “we” will be victorious simply by “awakening the masses” through ceaseless flooding of pseudo-intellectual and historical information. While information is definitely important in swaying the masses, it is only information in small doses; and preferably with proportionately high emotional content, that is necessary. This way, the prevention of the unintelligent from contradicting the intellectuals; and because of their numbers, overwhelming them, becomes as simple as restricting our propaganda efforts to a generalised and condensed format.
However, there are also a number of causes which pollute the propaganda and beliefs of those intelligent enough to be involved with the intellectuals. I think the fundamental issue is a lack of respect and a lack of thought. The majority of the anti-Jewish movement is composed of Americans who were born after the 1970s. As is stereotypically the case, they lack both respect and thought and indulge in their opposites. None are too afraid to accuse a certain person of historical value of being a Jew after only an hour of research. Similarly, many are under the illusion that their opinions, based on typically immature insights, opinions and a lack of wisdom, are actually of substance. Perhaps one of the reasons the anti-Jewish movement is having so much trouble is precisely because of this. For those in the past lacked the degree of, and in some cases any, historical precedence - at least that they were aware of - that proved their beliefs. Even in the case of National Socialist Germany, many may notice that certain members of the Elite were comparatively un-educated on the “Jewish Problem”. Despite this, the National Socialists were completely capable of forming proper policy and establishing an “official line” on the subject. While we are far more informed, we lack any wisdom. Instead of thinking, we give our opinions. Instead of analysing, we wait for someone else to do so, in order to reproduce the same analysis with alterations fitting our own opinions. All in all, this is the result of the badly parented younger generations who have been nurtured to the point of a collective egotistical narcissism.
An enormous amount of collective dysfunction are part of this problem, but I believe the above are the most detrimental. While they do not yet effect Aryanism, they will with its expansion. For this reason, we must target the right groups with our propaganda and our members must be able to follow without fully understanding the situation. We must entice the Elite with Aryanist spirit and the masses with a party platform. All in all, if we are able to create loyalty, we will be able to successfully create a mainstream movement which does not suffer from the usual side-effects of division, factionalism and fragility.