Posted by delendaestziobot.
Kevin MacDonald writes a great deal on Jewish activities, Jewish racialism, Jewish psychology, Jewish history, Jewish Zionism, Israel, Jews in America, Jewish customs, laws, Jewish humour, etc, etc, if it’s of Jewish concern and interest than Kevin Macdonald has probably written or spoken about it at one time or another, he talks a great deal about Jews and Zionism, and because he is non-Jewish himself, this has attracted some criticism from Jewish sources who are very sensitive when it comes to matters like this; a non-Jew for example discussing Jews and offering criticism. So it is that Kevin MacDonald has attracted some criticism in return from certain sensitive Jewish sources, but at the same time he has received praise from other Jewish sources, who welcomed such timely criticism, they themselves as Jews, saw the need for reform at various times and did not mind that a Gentile was reiterating their own convictions. In fact all Jews seem to find something in Macdonald’s work that they cannot help but agree with, even Jews who of course yell and shriek ‘anti-Semite’, ‘neo-nazi’, ‘racist’, when they hear any Gentile even dare mention anything at all other than praise, even these Jews on reflection usually find themselves agreeing with Macdonald’s academic arguments, sometimes cheering him on, sometimes even considering him a guilty pleasure, yes, many Jews, especially the hawkish Zionist, the cynical Zionist would and does find Macdonald’s writings very appealing, even though he is a Gentile.
What is the basis of Macdonald’s academic arguments and critique? He is an advocate of “evolutionary psychology” and he has sought to explain the Jewish mind and behaviour in purely biological Darwinian evolutionary terms. And he basically comes to the conclusion that Jews behave as they do because they are hard-wired to do so, just another biological group competing with other biological groups for food, resources and mating partners. And from this Darwinian perspective Macdonald than argues that the reason why Jews have experienced anti-Semitism in the past is that they as a group, a racial group have out-competed other racial groups for resources and mating partners, and the main reason that Macdonald proposes for this is that the Jewish racial biological group has practiced a type of racial intelligence eugenics, so they have evolved over time to be more intelligent than other groups. And that groups of Gentiles have reacted like any other group of animals would when they are confronted with a superior group of animals who are more likely to out-compete them for limited resources that are available. Macdonald sees this anti-Semitism as a perfectly natural instinctive result of one group losing out to another, his view of the German National Socialists was that they just tried to do the same thing as the Jews were doing! A “mirror image” of Judaism! Indeed Macdonald actually endorses this type of Darwinian competition and views it as inevitable. Now of course being a Zionist correct professor from the Zionist halls of Academic Americana, Macdonald makes sure that he does not deny the holocaust, and suggests that it did occur and happened merely and as the end result of an impersonal biological chain reaction. I suppose that Kevin Macdonald has no problem with being deceitful about this, because he sees deceptive behaviour as being purely advantageous in the competition for the ‘survival of the fittest’ game, just like competitors on the American ‘Televitz’ game show ‘Survivor’, lying and being deceitful is all “part of the game”! So Macdonald has no problem with lying, he is willing to claim that the Holocaust actually happened, when in reality it never took place, for the same reason as the Jews; lying and cheating and deceiving is all part of the great evolutionary game of life or so they think. And he goes on further in his theorizing to suggest that perhaps seeing that the Jews have been in his eyes ‘successful’ then perhaps his own group of Gentiles should do the same, becoming more like the Jews and learn from their tried and tested environmental strategies.
So it is apparent that Kevin Macdonald, even amongst the obligatory accusations of ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘neo-nazi’, is actually, at least in his eyes, seeing the Jews in a favourable light, their success should be emulated, its perfected naturally, desirable in fact now, he extends this to the hawkish Zionist Jews, the extreme right so to speak of Judaism;
“But the bottom line is that the Zionists were successful. Israel would not have become a state without a great many deeply ethnocentric Jews willing to engage in any means necessary to bring about their dream: a state that would be a vehicle for their ethnic interests. It would not have come about without the most radical among them people like Jabotinsky, Begin, Shamir, Sharon, and their supporters – a group that now includes the entire organized American Jewish community. The impending dispossession of Europeans will only be avoided if people of their ilk can be found among the political class of Europeans.” – Kevin Macdonald ‘Understanding Jewish Influence II’
Well Macdonald has already answered my title question, he is not a mild dove reformer of Judaism but a cynical Zionist in the order of a Jabotinsky or a Ariel Sharon, to the “Which Way Western Man?” question Macdonald would answer ‘to Zion by any means necessary’! The end justifies the means, any act of depravity and criminal savagery or deceit is good as long you are acting in the interests of your ethnicity, as long as your ‘ethnocentric’, that is the most important evolutionary trait for worldly success! Macdonald thinks that this is perhaps the best way, after all it worked for the Jews….But no, that is not success! Firstly I do not consider the Jews a ‘success’, no true Aryan would consider the Jews a success, but only as a terrible failure, a ghastly unmitigated disaster, like a cluster bomb going off in a fine china shop! With the folly of the Gentiles only adding more fuel to the explosion.
Kevin Macdonald concludes that the Jews, because of their ‘history’, which he believes is written in the OT scriptures, is primarily concerned with an ideology stressing racial purity that the Jews on their sojourns, after the Diaspora, ruthlessly maintained their superior genetic traits through strict reproductive controls that ensured they kept their competitive edge amongst their Gentile host population, this practiced eugenics ensured their genetics remained segregated and untainted!
“From an evolutionary perspective, the purpose of this ideology is to ensure the continuity of the kinship group, even within the diaspora context in which there are enormous pressures for assimilation and gradual loss of contact with other group members. The results have been extraordinarily effective: as indicated in Chapter 2, Jews have maintained a significant genetic distance between themselves and their host societies for centuries. Indeed they are the only group that has successfully maintained genetic and cultural segregation while living in the midst of other peoples over an extremely long period of time. Johnson calls them “the most tenacious people in history.” – Kevin Macdonald. ’A people that shall dwell alone’
This is just false, no basis in reality whatsoever! We can measure Macdonald’s theorizing against real history, for an example I will use the historical data of Jews in Denmark which we can compare against Macdonald’s false theorizing. I use Denmark as a microcosm, it serves us well because it is small and the Jewish history within Denmark is concise and easily accessible.
Christian IV (reigned 1588-1648) was the first Danish king to establish connections with Jews. King Christian IV appointed Albert Dionis to the post of mintmaster at Gluckstadt on the Elbe in 1619. Dionis was a Sephardic Jew originally from Portugal who had settled in Hamburg and established an import-export business which had links to Denmark. Thus Dionis became the first Jew to be issued a royal Danish letter of protection as he accepted the employment position in Denmark.
Firstly this Jew was offered a position of employment by the Danish King and thus he received a passport that allowed him into the Kingdom of Denmark. No Jew was allowed to step foot inside Denmark without the King’s permission. Now Macdonald cannot explain this as one biological evolutionary group aggressively outcompeting another for finite resources, resulting in the genetically superior Jewish racial group overwhelming the Danes with sheer intellectual and genetic mastery! NO, that is ridiculous, the reality is one lone businessman who was known to be Jew from Portugal was recruited by the King of Denmark to work for him, Dionis was offered a position of employment, and being a position more profitable than his present situation he accepted. Otherwise he simply would never been able to step foot inside Denmark.
After consulting with Dionis in 1622. King Christian IV invited “Portuguese” Jews from Amsterdam and Hamburg to settle in Gluckstadt in the hope that this newly established town would equal the business acumen of Hamburg. To attract business away from Hamburg the King offered considerable incentives – including start-up capital, trading privileges, low taxes, freedom of religion. These incentives attractive as they were did indeed entice many traders and business men to Gluckstadt to set up and establish shop, trade and various industry, amongst the new arrivals were Jews.
Again the only reason that any more Jews were allowed in Denmark is because The Danes invited them along with other traders and business people, an invitation with attractive incentives and protective travel arrangements is hardly an aggressive premeditated Darwinian takeover of one group over another! No the only reason Jews arrived in Denmark was that they were made an attractive offer to go there, a better situation than what they already had, it was the Danish King’s design, his foresight, his idea, and his city which he and the Danes built that some fortunate Jews moved into.
In return the Danish King for all he offered expected that these traders and business people furnish the Royal Court and the rest of Denmark with quality goods. Later some “German” (Ashkenazi) Jews traded in Denmark, but they had to be able to provide a letter of safe-conduct, since the right to trade and live in Denmark only applied to “portuguese” Jews. This eventually changed and German Jews were allowed to travel and trade in Denmark freely. This was only after they had proven that they could be enterprising merchants with disposable capital. This is the historical account of the first Jews in Denmark…
I think I have made my point, but I will add this; The Danish Decree of 1814 had in effect given equal rights to Jews along with the rest of the population, which meant that Jews could play a larger role in public life. A great many social relationships developed between Christian and Jewish families and, when these resulted in marriage, the Jewish partner was usually baptized. In this way the leading Jewish families became Christian because the wealthiest Jewish families actively sought to attract Danish Christians as marriage partners for their sons and daughters, and willingly gave up their Jewish religion to achieve this social goal. This often created division in the Jewish community of Denmark who felt betrayed as their leading families rejected them to become Christians. On the other hand the willing defection and the admiration of the Jews towards their Danish hosts won for them greater Christian favour and understanding, this understanding on the part of the Danes allowed converted Jews to still feel proud of the Jewish heritage and they were encouraged to be proud of who they were. and this settled tensions in the rest of the Jewish community.
Right, so the reality here is very different to that theorized by the professor of psychology for the University of California; Kevin Macdonald. Kevin Macdonald seems to understand very little of history, the example I have given could be applied over and over again and extended to many, many different nations and kingdoms throughout history.
All Kevin Macdonald wants to achieve is some plausible justification for racist Zionist behaviour and any racist behaviour for that matter, so he falsifies history and uses spurious science to achieve this, he is a Cynical Zionist from a Zionist Correct American Academic Institution. Kevin Macdonald serves nobody’s interest except himself and other hawkish racist, deluded, irrational Zionists. His extreme views and biased theories may have found some audience with Jewish Zionist racists and White Nationalist Gentiles (BS Gentiles), which Macdonald calls ‘ethnocentric’, but the last thing our movement wants is more cynical Zionist hawks and their Boromir Syndrome Gentile hangers-on.
Sieg Heil!
Entries (RSS)