Recently Pope Francis made some controversial remarks in which he condoned child abuse:
“The Pope, smiling and miming the action of slapping a child on the bottom, said: “One time, I heard a father say, ‘At times I have to hit my children a bit, but never in the face so as not to humiliate them.’
“That’s great. He had a sense of dignity. He should punish, do the right thing, and then move on,” he told around 7,000 people gathered in the Pope Paul VI Hall on Wednesday.”
Hitting a child is only humiliating if the child is hit in the face? Perhaps the Pope would like to demonstrate his lack of humiliation while being hit on the bottom, and later reminisce with a smile how great it was? And the man had a sense of dignity because he hurts his children when they don’t listen? Seriously?
The point of this article, however, is not to show what type of person the Pope is, but to show the great hypocrisy of Islamophobes and racists, especially “Christian” ones who visit our site and spam us with accusations that we’re hypocrites when it comes to non-Aryan Muslims and non-Aryan “non-whites”. They find a few Muslims advocating ignoble behavior, and suddenly every Muslim is a criminal.
Well, here is the Pope - no, not a random priest from a random neighborhood in Buenos Aires, but the Pope, God’s representative on Earth, as well as an infallible human being, according to Catholic dogma - advocating barbaric treatment of children. Do I suddenly declare war on all Catholics? Do I claim that every Catholic is, by definition or in practice, a child abuser, or at least secretly supportive of it? Do I find statistics to demonstrate that child abuse is high in Catholic families or predominantly Catholic countries, and hence conclude that no Catholic could ever become an Aryanist (or even a somewhat decent human being)? (Never mind me doing same things about all Christians or people born in Argentina or people of Italian ancestry!)
NO! That would be ridiculous. One person (or even a large group of them) does not define every person in his group. Not every Catholic (or Christian or person born in Argentina or person of Italian ancestry) is Pope Francis, and Pope Francis is not every Catholic. But for some reason, whenever our enemies point to “Muslims” being ignoble - say, Hamid, a random “Muslim” somewhere in Sweden advocating rape of non-Muslim Swedish women - suddenly every Muslim is a criminal….and people actually believe them! If it weren’t for this, I wouldn’t have even bothered to post this: certainly we have more important matters to attend to than to freak out about every traditionalist and advocate of ignobility, regardless of where he comes from.
We value nobility, and nobility is found in individuals, not in herds. If you are a noble individual - an Aryan - whether Catholic, Christian, Argentinian, of Italian ancestry, Muslim or something else, contact us here: http://aryanism.net/about/contact/.
Entries (RSS)
Decebal, I’m glad you posted this. I said a while ago that we shouldn’t praise the Catholic Church. It may seem to be making progress on issues like gay marriage, but the only reason the Catholic Church ever makes progress is because it’s forced to. People care about gay marriage (actually quite a superficial issue), so it’s started to move towards accepting it because if it doesn’t then it will lose support and won’t be able to survive. It’s the same thing with their acceptance of evolution or that the Earth revolves around the Sun. They might change, but they’re always the last ones to change, doing so when they no longer have a choice. Most Catholics still don’t care about corporal punishment of children (or any other kind of punishment of children), so the church isn’t changing its views - because they don’t have to. All these ‘progressive’ issues the Catholic Church is discussing on are just trendy issues they’re using to improve their image. They are completely insincere and don’t really care about any of these things. I know that in a recent post AS complained about people idolising Dracula - well Pope Francis is an absolute vampire. He’s the head of an organisation that has a ritual that literally involves drinking (what they think is) blood.
I recommend that anyone whose views resonate with this website leaves the Catholic Church and searches for a better and truer interpretation of Jesus’ teachings, just as I would recommend a Muslim whose views are in accordance with this website to abandon mainstream Islam and join some Ghulat sect or Sufism or something else.
POPE FRANCIS WILL ABDICATE IN THE RELATIVELY NEAR FUTURE —WITHIN THE NEXT SIX YEARS.
@Anthony
“I said a while ago that we shouldn’t praise the Catholic Church. It may seem to be making progress on issues like gay marriage, but the only reason the Catholic Church ever makes progress is because it’s forced to. People care about gay marriage (actually quite a superficial issue), so it’s started to move towards accepting it because if it doesn’t then it will lose support and won’t be able to survive.”
I still agree with you on this issue, but what AS got right back then was that Orthodox Christianity is much more traditionalist than Catholicism - speaking from my own experiences in both communities - so it will be even harder for us to do our job in predominantly Orthodox countries (though we should still try, especially in strategically important places like Russia).
“Most Catholics still don’t care about corporal punishment of children (or any other kind of punishment of children), so the church isn’t changing its views – because they don’t have to.”
Right. Note how the Pope didn’t condone extremely brutal beating of children (which would be frowned on) but only hitting children “a bit” (which is OK for many people).
“They are completely insincere and don’t really care about any of these things.”
I wouldn’t say this for individual Catholics (especially in the laity) because many do care, whether out of empathy or simply because it’s the popular idea of what is good.
“I recommend that anyone whose views resonate with this website leaves the Catholic Church and searches for a better and truer interpretation of Jesus’ teachings, just as I would recommend a Muslim whose views are in accordance with this website to abandon mainstream Islam and join some Ghulat sect or Sufism or something else.”
Definitely. What I meant was that people born into Catholic families (like you and me) can become Aryanists, just like people born in Muslim families can become Aryanists. In both cases, though, I do recommend further study or introspection.
@RY,
“POPE FRANCIS WILL ABDICATE IN THE RELATIVELY NEAR FUTURE —WITHIN THE NEXT SIX YEARS.”
Where did you find this?
@Decebal
>Where did you find this?
NOWHERE; I INTUITED IT.
Pope Francis is just a False-Left (Liberalistic) replacement, that’s it and of course not all Catholics beat children, that is an outdated stereotype. I’ve personally seen cases where Non-Catholics have beaten children, I’ve seen cases where Muslim, Eastern Orthodox, Atheistic, and Protestant parents have beaten children.
Anyways, of course never judge someone based on their ancestry, On my Mom’s side My grandfather is Rajput, (also My grandmother is a Anglo-Indian), Alcoholism is quite popular in this caste (Rajput) my Grandparents were Alcoholics, but my On my fathers side Schizophrenia runs crazy, My Grandmother, 2 Uncles (one who has WNist tendencies), and Brother has it, But I will hopefully never be Schizophrenic or Alcoholic.
If I were to tell this to someone who judges people based on their ancestry They’d call me a Schizophrenic Alcoholic Indo-European.
@Alex Alexander
“Pope Francis is just a False-Left (Liberalistic) replacement”
Yes, that is true. He is falsely set in contrast to his predecessor (the so-called “Rottweiler of God”) who was (and is, I guess) on the Right. If RY is correct that Francis will step down, I hope they don’t keep switching it up like this.
“of course not all Catholics beat children, that is an outdated stereotype. I’ve personally seen cases where Non-Catholics have beaten children, I’ve seen cases where Muslim, Eastern Orthodox, Atheistic, and Protestant parents have beaten children.”
Yes, that was my point. But apparently, if WNs can find “Muslim” rapists (or child abusers or anything ignoble), then that’s a defining feature of Muslims.
Not that the WNs really care about rape: they’re really much more silent about it when it comes to “whites” raping “whites”, and some of them even blame the victim (usually women) for dressing indecently by their standards. (In practice, due to the inferiority of most people, I see how exposing more of one’s body increases the risk of rape, but I would never hold the victim as being in the moral wrong.)
“(In practice, due to the inferiority of most people, I see how exposing more of one’s body increases the risk of rape, but I would never hold the victim as being in the moral wrong.)”
Yeah, if you cross the street, your chances of getting hit by a car increase, but you wouldn’t hold the pedestrian guilty if they got hit, rather the driver of the car for not paying attention. But you wouldn’t ban driving or punish all driver in that city.
@Decebal
“Not that the WNs really care about rape: they’re really much more silent about it when it comes to “whites” raping “whites”, and some of them even blame the victim (usually women) for dressing indecently by their standards.”
I HATE it when people blame the victim, I’d rather blame the violent nature of the perpetrator
(I’d would love to see them to be executed, or put in prison for life), I also blame societies sexual deviancy, and most WNs are very sexually obsessed with “white” woman (specifically the ‘blonde n’ blue’ ones), they USE them in them in their propaganda just like children (specifically the ‘blonde n’ blue’ ones). I can see cases of them (WNs) being put in jail for rape, due to their “white” woman fetish.
“If RY is correct that Francis will step down, I hope they don’t keep switching it up like this.”
He could perhaps, but he will probably be replaced with another “false-left” or “right-winged” person.
I DO NOT THINK THAT POPE FRANCIS WILL BE SUCCEEDED BY ANYONE; HIS ABDICATION WILL BE BOTH, A CAUSE, AND A CONSEQUENCE, OF CHRISTIANITY’S DISSOLUTION AS AN INSTITUTION.
POPE FRANCIS’ ABDICATION WILL BE THE CULMINATION OF DIVERSE FACTORS IN COALITION THAT HAVE BEEN OCCURRING FOR DECADES, AND IT WILL ALSO BE THE OCCURRENCE THAT WILL RETROACTIVELY IMBUE THOSE FACTORS WITH THE LEGITIMACY NECESSARY FOR THEM TO BE REGARDED AS RELEVANT ENOUGH TO DAMAGE CHRISTIANITY ITSELF.
CHRISTIANITY AS AN INSTITUTION HAS LESS THAN A DECADE OF EXISTENCE LEFT.
I understand that this is totally unrelated but…
http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/news/dut-jewish-call-outrage-1.1816334#.VNxFcET03RZ
“Jewish students at the Durban University of Technology (DUT) who supported the State of Israel should be kicked out, the Students Representative Council (SRC) has demanded.
And this applies to students who are sponsored by the Israeli government. The demands, sent to the DUT management, have shocked and angered Jewish organisations.
The vice-chancellor of the university, Professor Ahmed Bawa, said the demand by the SRC and the Progressive Youth Alliance that the DUT deregister all Jewish students “is totally unacceptable”.
Fantastic! This demand by the Progressive Youth Alliance is “totally acceptable,” “totally rational” and “painfully necessary.” I hope that other student groups within and outside of South Africa follow their lead.
“I still agree with you on this issue, but what AS got right back then was that Orthodox Christianity is much more traditionalist than Catholicism – speaking from my own experiences in both communities – so it will be even harder for us to do our job in predominantly Orthodox countries (though we should still try, especially in strategically important places like Russia).”
I hold an opposite opinion. The Catholic Church was always an institution for maintaining culture. Anyone who goes against what they say and still claim to be Christian is a blasphemer, etc. They are right wing traditionalists.
Orthodoxy, on the other hand, allows for gnosticism: http://www.bogoslov.ru/en/text/print/1243139.html
@Pandorastop
Thanks for the good news!
“The Secretary of the SRC, Mqondisi Duma, said: “As the SRC, we had a meeting and analysed international politics. We took the decision that Jewish students, especially those who do not support the Palestinian struggle, should deregister.””
We have an entryism project right here. Nikolai, please find a way to meet Duma in person ASAP to express support and offer to help the DUT SRC and Progressive Youth Alliance in any way you can, and together to figure out how this initiative can be expanded to every educational institution in South Africa, or better yet in other countries also. Pandorastop, please supervise Nikolai (you can get Nikolai’s contact details from Decebal if you don’t already have them).
http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/entryism/
@Akhnat0n
If you get my email, make sure to spell the email address I gave you exactly as it is written, because when I made it, I made a typo.
Just to add some conclusion to some of the above discussions, I would like to state that I have contacted Duma and will see where it leads. Decebal, I hope you will forgive me for playing hardball in my initial email. As I told you, I will do my duty nevertheless. What needs to be said is that very, very few people understand the situation in this country (past and present). I haven’t met a single person who knew how close this country was to becoming Bolshevised. Even more alarming then that red China is in prime position for an economic, and subsequently political, takeover.
On an unrelated note, Anthony said:
“I recommend that anyone whose views resonate with this website leaves the Catholic Church”.
As Decebal knows, I’m keeping my finger on the pulse of world media… Perhaps Mr. Jason Baran (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbODvXvqRthwO8AAdm2curw) needs to be on one of the “lists”. Sure, his view count is pitiful, but it pains my heart to see the Swastika behind him. For a person to be Catholic and bear the Swastika might be permissible, but not when it is out of sheer ignorance. David Duke dropped his mask when he stated that the Indians are foolish and backward for not eating their cows. Such people must be denounced - out of principle.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - you guys are doing a fantastic job. I will most certainly be issuing your articles (i.e. the entire main site) to new members soon in book form. Such honesty will break through the clouds that have darkened the times we live in.
Niemals Kapitalieren
@Nikolai
“red China”
“Red China” has not existed since Deng took over from Mao. Currently, China is the only country in the world which practices (a very weak form, by National Socialist standards, of) state control over reproduction via its a One-Child Policy (which, incidentally, was implemented during Deng’s administration). We want every country in the world to adopt this policy as a soft start towards stronger implementations of state control over reproduction, hopefully culminating in Aryanization. Don’t you think it would be excellent if South Africa adopted a One-Child Policy ASAP? If so, a positive view of China by South Africans (and hence a positive attitude towards South Africa adopting a policy already practiced in China) is essential on the propaganda front.
What we should really be afraid of are the recent signs that China is starting to roll back its One-Child Policy due to self-doubt:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/17/us-china-onechild-idUSBREA0G0J220140117
A rising trend of other countries adopting the One-Child Policy (and crediting China for it) would increase China’s own confidence that its One-Child Policy was correct all along, and that rolling it back is the mistake. You need to think about how South Africa could lead such a trend.
“I will most certainly be issuing your articles (i.e. the entire main site) to new members soon in book form.”
Please do not. Providing URLs to the various pages of the main site will suffice. And please ask us first about such things.
@Akhnaton,
“The Catholic Church was always an institution for maintaining culture. Anyone who goes against what they say and still claim to be Christian is a blasphemer, etc. They are right wing traditionalists.”
The Catholic Church, yes. I don’t suggest any form of entryism into it. But Catholics, at least the ones I’ve met, are less traditionalistic than the Orthodox, and that’s what matters. (After all, “orthodox” usually means in accordance with tradition, which is a warning sign already.)
“Orthodoxy, on the other hand, allows for gnosticism: http://www.bogoslov.ru/en/text/print/1243139.html”
I’m assuming you’re referring mainly to the opening part. The sections on a trinitarian God as existing absolutely free and out of love are interesting, but what’s laid out there isn’t Gnosticism. Actually it’s pretty standard Judeo-Christianity. It talks about transcendence as if it meant the same thing as immortality (of whatever sort); I smell survivalism rather than militarism. It talks about a creator god (Yahweh?) who created us, made us not be absolutely free, but will then also play the role of saviour, which is a repugnant idea.
And then there’s this: ““Jesus Christ does not justify the title of Savior because he brings the world a beautiful revelation a sublime teaching about the person, but because He realizes in history the very reality of the person and makes it the basis and ‘hypostasis’ of the person for every man.” ”
In fact, the former interpretation is found in Gnostic texts, while the idea that Jesus enabled our salvation (and thus that our salvation is dependent on Jesus, which doesn’t make sense if we, as the writers of article did, mean absolute freedom by “salvation”) through his birth, death and resurrection, and our acceptance of him as savior originates, as far as I know, with Paul of Tarsus (Jew), and is the core doctrine of mainstream Judeo-Christianity (and not limited to Orthodoxy).
@Pandorastop, I’ll send you the email today. Did you get my other ones? (Don’t rush. Just curious.)
@Nikolai,
“Decebal, I hope you will forgive me for playing hardball in my initial email. As I told you, I will do my duty nevertheless. What needs to be said is that very, very few people understand the situation in this country (past and present).”
No, don’t worry. We still need to discuss a few things though, and I will get back to you once I have some more free time. What counts now is that you’ve contacted Duma. Hopefully you two will meet in person soon.
“Perhaps Mr. Jason Baran (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbODvXvqRthwO8AAdm2curw) needs to be on one of the “lists”.”
I’ve checked a few of his videos and I don’t think he’s significant enough to add. I mean, I can count on my fingers the number of views he’s got for most of his videos.
“…But for some reason, whenever our enemies point to “Muslims” being ignoble – say, Hamid, a random “Muslim” somewhere in Sweden advocating rape of non-Muslim Swedish women – suddenly every Muslim is a criminal…”
Big money in Islamaphobia, probably the main reason!
Tunisian activist quits Femen over ‘Islamophobia’
Tunisian activist Amina Sboui on Tuesday accused Femen of being “Islamophobic” and financed by “shady money,” and said she was leaving the European feminist group famous for its topless protests.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.542575
If I’m not mistaken the liberal Jewish billionaire George Soro’s funds Femen?
CAIR Report: Islamophobia Network Funded with $119 Million 2008 to 2011
http://www.cair.com/press-center/press-releases/12149-cair-report-islamophobia-network-funded-with-119-million-2008-to-2011.html
@AS: We want every country in the world to adopt this policy as a soft start towards stronger implementations of state control over reproduction, hopefully culminating in Aryanization.
If this was implemented before Aryanization it would result in genocide and disaster, as it has been doing in China. Although organization, government, is a necessary evil for humans, implementing a program of state controlled reproduction before you have mechanisms to keep those who seek political power as far away from the government as possible in place, state controlled reproduction will ultimately be nothing more than a money issue, as it is in China. Chinese abort females more-so than males , because males make more money, which in the end plays on traditionalism, feeds chauvinism, and degrades all life to being nothing more than a mere numerical value in an economic system designed to com-modify everything it possibly can…
@AS: Just to drive my point home a little further. State controlled reproduction before Aryanization of said state has been achieved, is synonymous with the the metaphor of ‘putting the horse before the cart’.
Under the current Capitalist system, a great philosopher would be sacrificed for a menial laborer, because the laborer rakes in more cash over his lifetime, hence bringing in more profit for his overlord. Yet, as a whole the said state would profit more from the great philosophizer…
In an economical system based upon achievement, rather than ‘time put in’, both the philosopher and the menial laborer are on a more equal plain, thus having equal value. What is your contribution to your state and its people, rather than how can you make profit for us, the corporate state?
Hence state controlled reproduction in China: Male = more money. Female = Less Money. Equals, abort the female, even though she might be a great Philosopher or Artist…
@Aryaism.net: If you don’t post my post about the big money behind ‘Isalmophophobia’ on this blog what can I say, why is this ‘post’ still awaiting moderation?
@Numinous Sun
“State controlled reproduction before Aryanization of said state has been achieved, is synonymous with the the metaphor of ‘putting the horse before the cart’.”
How do you propose we achieve Aryanization without using state control over reproduction to promote heritably noble traits and eliminate heritably ignoble traits?
“implementing a program of state controlled reproduction before you have mechanisms to keep those who seek political power as far away from the government as possible in place”
State control over reproduction is how we intend to address the concerns you bring up. For example, all Jews, all members of organized Gentile tribes and otherwise all members of secret societies (e.g. Freemasons) would be prohibited from reproducing.
“Chinese abort females more-so than males , because males make more money”
The reason why females are disproportionately aborted in China is the desire by families to produce an heir to the patrilineally inherited surname, which therefore must be a male heir. Even if females were making more money than males on average, this would not change the phenomenon that the females’ assets inherited by their offpsring would be inherited by people bearing the surname of the females’ husbands, and therefore perceived as a loss to the surname of the females’ maiden family. (To the credit of the Chinese government, they have offered the legal liberty for offspring to officially carry the surname of the mother or of both parents at the same time as alternatives to carrying the surname of the father, but few have employed this liberty in practice.)
In any case, abortion would be illegal in a National Socialist state (except in cases of babies so badly deformed that they would have no way to even express a wish to be euthanized after birth), so the point is moot.
@AS: I have to say, you come across as speaking ‘legalize’. Why so wordy?
State control over reproduction is how we intend to address the concerns you bring up. For example, all Jews, all members of organized Gentile tribes and otherwise all members of secret societies (e.g. Freemasons) would be prohibited from reproducing.
Umm, my entire point was based upon the fact that this is NOT what is happening in China at present, under an Authoritarian Capitalist system, but the exact opposite. Any MALE is chosen over a FEMALE simply because of CAPITAL! Did you even read my posts?
What are you talking about?
“We value nobility, and nobility is found in individuals, not in herds” YES! Because herds lead to this:
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/gallery/2015/apr/01/over-population-over-consumption-in-pictures?CMP=share_btn_fb
Those pictures would be well placed on any articles discussing population numbers, current technology and related politics.
http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/pope-francis-on-how-compassion-for-animals-can-help-the-environment/
@LOZ
Most of the non-vegans I speak to, upon finding out about my diet, would say pretty much the same things as Francis - something along the lines of: “I also respect/value/feel sorry for animals….” - and then proceed to make excuses as to why they won’t do anything to help those animals and why they’ll continue to contribute to their exploitation. If one isn’t vegan, or at the very least on the path to it, no statements of compassion mean anything; Pope Francis, to my knowledge, is neither of the two.
As for environmentalism, some of the images Miecz posted above are directly or indirectly related to meat-consumption, so I give the same verdict.
In Francis’ encyclical he rules out population control as a solution to environmental issues. It does more harm than good.