The USA has been for the past half century and remains the primary vehicle of Zionist power. A significant proportion of Zionist power – particularly its direct military, economic and political power – is tied up in the USA. Thus, any attempt to extradite a state from Zionism must necessarily include an extradition American power and influence. However, this depends on an awareness and the will to extricate the state from Zionist power – a characteristic almost solely of an Aryanist State.
While following the collapse of the USSR, the world became unipolar overnight; since then, Russia has re-emerged, alongside China (amongst others) as counterweights to American power. Russia, perhaps due to its history, is at the moment far more prepared – although less able – to oppose American hegemony. China, on the other hand, possesses an enormous stock of political, economic and military power with which it could undoubtedly remove the US from all of East-Asia.
Thus, it seems that any state which seeks to oppose Zionism, has two options. Either it stands on its own or it seeks an alliance with the most appropriate of America’s emerging competitors. The former is reserved for states of considerable power – particularly in their region – such as Iran. However, for the majority of states, an alliance with a powerful neighbour is the only option. The difficulty of this can be seen in the former Soviet bloc, with some states resolutely pulled into the American sphere of influence and others remaining (or reverting) to the Russians.
The Middle East and Asia are far more complex. Due to the intensity of American intervention, Iran remains in a poor strategic position for either offence or defence. Although it has built ties with other states and organisations – most famously Syria and Hamas and Hezbollah – it requires the support of at least one other major power to even maintain the status-quo (that is, America not invading Iran). Arguably, it is most important that the situation in the Middle-East is reversed, as it has direct access to Israel – which, alongside the Anglosphere, remains the base of Zionist power. Thus, Hitler’s words remain applicable:
“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”
Asia, while concentrated with states opposed to America in varying degrees (Russia, China, North Korea, Myanmar, etc.) also remains complex. The not-so-dormant nationalisms of each people will no doubt erupt over any attempt to change the status-quo, as is seen with the recurring troubles over Taiwan and the recent dispute over the Senkaku Islands. While the issue should be whether each state wishes to serve Zion or not, the arising conflict (whether political, economic and military) will be confused for a dualistic battle of nationalities. Asia, and East-Asia in particular, is the perfect case-in-point for the effectiveness of divisive tactics in preserving the domination of Zion.
Readers may have noticed earlier that I used the word ‘competitor’ when referring to the emerging major powers. This implies that it is possible that these emerging powers will merely eclipse and replace the USA as the centre of Zion – something which will be decisive in determining the course of the next century. China has all the means to replace America and maintain hegemony for epochs longer than the USA has. And there are only two paths: either China becomes the new Zion to achieve this power; or it achieves it and uses it against Zion. Seemingly, which path is chosen depends on my introductory statement; namely, whether the state possesses ‘an awareness and the will to extricate the state from Zionist power’. China is the key, as it is surprisingly unwilling to assert itself as a Zionist proxy (as opposed to India, which is much more willing at the moment). Nevertheless, the same dilemma applies to each major power.
As much of the readership is European, the case for Europe is both complex and simple. The simple fact is that Europe is happy to remain alongside Zion. The complex component of the strategic situation is the means by which this is achieved and the reasons for it. While some states are directly attached to the US (Britain and, increasingly, France), others are attached to the EU (Germany most notably). Both serve Zion nonetheless. Many more options remain open to European nations. It remains possible that even minor states could stand-alone (as direct overthrow against first-world nations is difficult politically). However, it would be more ideal if either the EU is transformed into a pan-European anti-Zionist superpower, or Russia reasserts itself in Eastern and Central Europe.
However, economically, the case for strategic revolution against Zionism favours the approach of using the major powers even more. Due to the intensity of increased integration between economies (globalisation), a state of interdependence has been created. It follows naturally that in the current status-quo that any state which is opposed or at least removed from Zionism will become a political pariah. Trade sanctions or not, political exclusion will create economic exclusion. All states know that their longevity and existence depends on the state of the economy (e.g. a large motivator of domestic Chinese support is derived from sustained and rapid growth).
Furthermore, even the major powers may prove unwilling to become economic pariahs. This is particularly the case with China, which depends on the USA (although less than vice-versa) for fuelling its export-oriented growth. Without the US spending as much as it does (caused by a loss of hegemony), Chinese growth will suffer tremendously (with all the consequences as unemployment leads into social division). Thankfully, China has recognised this – particularly since 2008 – and has diversified its export-growth to include much more of the developing world (most of whom only serve Zion in minor ways and for considerable economic benefit). An alliance of Russia and China along anti-Zionist lines would undoubtedly solve the bulk of the concerns of economic exclusion from the US sphere of influence (essentially the rest of the world).
This article focuses on the short and medium term potentialities and forms of, as well as the issues associated with, an anti-Zionist alliance. In the long-term, it is important – as with all things – that this anti-Zionism transforms into Aryanism. It remains very possible that a Zionist defeat will coincide with the rise of any or all of these powers as petty Gentile rivals. This challenge; however, remains distantly in the future and must be faced pre-emptively if this century is to be an Aryanist rather than Gentile victory.
>>>It remains very possible that a Zionist defeat will coincide with the rise of any or all of these powers as petty Gentile rivals.
China was always a distinct entity. We are taking here about the people that erected one of world’s wonders only to protect the independent development of their civilization. If they ever break free what makes you think they would be eager to replace Zionist one-worlders with some other one-worlders? Gentiles never replace ancestral traditions for bloodless Jacobine abstractions unless you force them into. So what can you do if they succeed? Nuke China? Send another Lenin to Russia? Or perhaps launch another invasion Invasion of Normandy?
>>>This challenge; however, remains distantly in the future and must be faced pre-emptively if this century is to be an Aryanist rather than Gentile victory.
Aryans shall flog the Hellespont once again.
http://getasword.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Battle-of-Thermopylae-in-300-Movie-Leonidas-and-Xerxes.gif
“China is the key, as it is surprisingly unwilling to assert itself as a Zionist proxy (as opposed to India, which is much more willing at the moment). Nevertheless, the same dilemma applies to each major power.”
Good point. Let us not forget that the Chinese refused to place sanctions upon Iran until they were forced by the West to do so (and even then they managed to water down the sanctions), whereas India was more than willing to launch several spy satellites to be used against Iran. In addition, Indo-Israel relations remain close due to India’s “Muslim Question” as anti-Muslim Hindu nationalists regard themselves as natural allies to anti-Muslim Jews. Hindutva applauds Zionism.
What I believe we must focus on is the removal of US troops from the Middle East. The retreat of the US military from the Persian Gulf, Iraq and Afghanistan will significantly increase Iranian hegemony in the region and pose an even greater threat upon Israel.
I would not place much faith in Russia.