It is a very popular assumption amongst “truthers”, anti-Zionists, White Nationalists and their associated groups that the right to bear arms was and remains one of the protections against tyranny. In this article I would like to point out that this assumption is not necessarily correct. It should be noted that it is up to your own judgment as to whether or not you will entertain this belief further.
The main theme of this article will be the false sense of security that the right to bear arms gives to Americans. This belief that guns are a line, or the final line, of protection against tyrannical governments is not as absolute as it may seem. For the mundane materialist, the gun may seem as his best defence against his enemy. One question; however, destroys this absolute. Why is it that Americans do not act, while those with less rights and freedoms continue their struggles year after year? Why do Americans, with their stockpile of guns and concrete bunkers, prove ineffective against their governments and enemies, while the Palestinians and Iraqi resistance prove so effective? Of course, it goes without saying that a material weapon is needed to continue struggle. However, as we can see, it is not the right to bear arms that has ever provided protection from internal enemies. What truly guarantees this is ?the will?.
While the American sits on his couch, with his Kool-Aid, watching the Superbowl, resistance is the last thing on his mind. No matter what arsenal the American has, it has proven ineffective. This is entirely because of will. Even those who are not the average ignorant American; those who claim to be part of the “resistance”, continue to beat their drums and chant, “from my cold dead hands”. We know where this ends. The man who still has fragments of his rights and freedoms, particularly the American, waits for his enemy to strike while confident of his victory. Always, this results in massacres of these “resistance fighters”. Many miles away; however, the Palestinian who barely has the funds and means to feed himself, carries his flag against the enemy. And, as we know, it is not Americans with guns, the many millions of useless, demoralised and weak-minded gun owners, who are feared by our enemies. It is the young man, grasping a stone, who is the true fighter - a man of struggle. No matter what the man of struggle must face, he continues his advance.
It should be evident to the audience that the right to bear arms means nothing. As has been demonstrated in New Orleans, the gun owner without will is not a man of struggle at all. And perhaps if Americans never had the right to bear arms they would depend more on their will than grotesque and petit-bourgeois manifestations of material intimidation and power.
The Americans, that have more weapons then People, are defeated. They do not have the spiritual or the will to fight back. While the Palestinians that lack the weapons, have the spiritual and will to fight back, and in fact their most effective weapons are their Will. “Suicide Bombers” that commit martyrdom and kill 10-12 possibly hundreds of enemy soldiers are more effective then any lazy American, that uses most of his time in front of his television and is armed with rifles and guns. The Men of America that fought against the British for Freedom are a thing of the past, Their Descends have been defeated by their enemy within their nation.
Yeah, I agree unfortunately. Americans are lazy, passive, non-offensive bums. Why would they revolt when they don’t even have the courage to offend someone verbally? They’re even more afraid of the truth. You tell them, and they say “calm down”. Which is … “calm down, i’m fine the way things are for me and my family”. Cowards!
What do you propose for Americans to do to not to be called cowards?