Over the past year or so the concept that the races, broadly defined as “White”, “Black”, “Asian”, “Arabic”, and sometimes “Native American”, should unite as a common front against Jewish domination has been influential amongst the otherwise aware theorists and commentators on Jewish control. The concept has caused the opposite of its aim; a passionate disunity, fueled by raw emotion and an embarrassing display of the primitive nature of men. This stalemate and bitter rivalry must be concluded either through a continuation of the unification concept or its rejection.
I think it is first important to withdraw from the clinging to this notion of unification for a proper analysis. To analyse and evaluate this concept, the reasons for and against its adoption should first be established. Subsequently, a decision must be made regarding what constitutes unification across racial lines. Is it a multiracial melting pot or more of a separatist alliance of nations and races? The desired conduct between nations and races should be established and the short and long-term goals of this unification concept should be developed. Overall, the current attempt at racial unification and cooperation is a weak and ill-thought out attempt which could have only been destined for failure.
The role Afrocentrism has played in this unification has been perhaps one of the main causes of its failure. Another attempt, lacking in logic, to create an equal footing, particularly between “Whites” and “Blacks”, turned into what is inevitably going to be the case: another form of supremacism. In an attempt to reduce or remove any notions of racial supremacy held by “Whites”; “Blacks”, who are involved in this racial unification against Jewish control of all goyim, have resorted to Afrocentric rhetoric. In doing so, they are promoting one supremacism for another. It has been started previously that the Jews create circular relationships, beliefs, structures and concepts in order to divide and paralyse the goyim. Furthermore, we can see the role of Jews play a more direct role in Afrocentrism. Afrocentrists, particularly those involved in the movement against Jewish control, are quick to point out that the author of two anti-Afrocentric books, one addressing Afrocentrism in general and one addressing “Black Athena”, Mary Lefkowitz, is a Jew.
Just as many are quick to point out the funding of Hitler by not only American bankers, but also Jews, as a reason to discard Hitler as “another puppet”. However, when one has properly studied Jewish behaviour throughout history, a short analysis of these two cases will prove interesting. Just as the Jews enjoy constant division, they also thrive with never-ending and circular debate. An example of this is the constant battles between Capitalism and Socialism, both being instigated and promoted by Jews or those of Jewish spirit. It should go without saying that Mary Lefkowitz is only one point of this circular debate. Her book, “Black Athena Revisited”, is addressed as a rebuttal to the book, “Black Athena”, by Martin Bernal, who is also a Jew. It is now obvious that Afrocentrism is simply a ploy in order for the goyim to react primitively and naturally to perceived threats against the nation or race they associate with.
Once racial unification and cooperation has been properly analysed and assessed, it should either be fully adopted as a fundamental part of the movement?s philosophy or totally discarded. Half attempts like has already occurred can only result in a repeat of the current disunity and fragmentation. However, it is also important to note that unity does not exclusively mean the integration of all similar beliefs. It is far more beneficial to have proper unity amongst a smaller group than less unity amongst an all-inclusive group.
If racial unification and cooperation is adopted as a legitimate tenant, then neither the constant inclusion nor the total exclusion of race from all other topics should be desired. Total exclusion leaves the movement easy prey to infiltrators who can easily create disunity and an over accentuation of race can cause what has already happened, a replacement of one supremacism over another.
Entries (RSS)