One of my dense Polish-American kin, Alex Storozynski, wrote this article on his Huffington Post blog. I used to respect Storozynski as he is passionate promoter of Polish culture in the New York area. He usually tries to get Polish-Americans to reconnect with their native land and culture without too much in your face nationalist pandering. However, with this little number, he has proven himself to be a hopeless goy, doomed to delusion.

The media’s slander of Poland: Ignorance, lazy editing, or malicious libel?
By Alex Storozynski

The New York-born Chief Rabbi of Poland, Michael Schudrich, says, “Accusing Poles of participation in the Holocaust is a sin.” Yet on a regular basis, American journalists do just that by calling Auschwitz a “Polish concentration camp.” This is Holocaust revisionism.

SoE: The correct term here would be “incorrect” or “inaccurate Holocaust revisionism.” The reasons for this are, of course, way above Storozynski’s head which is packed with gas chamber myths and other assorted nightmares. Also it is worth noting that Storozynski automatically assumes revisionism is a bad thing.

The Nazi concentration camps were built by Germans, run by Germans, and guarded by Germans. The victims of those camps were Polish. Newspaper editors justify use of the term “Polish concentration camp” as geographical shorthand for “a German concentration camp in occupied Poland.” But this shorthand is Orwellian doublespeak that turns victim into perpetrator and distorts history. It perpetuates ignorance about the Holocaust and gives impressionable readers the idea that Poles built the camps. The Auschwitz killing factory was a product of German engineering, and both Polish Jews and Catholics were murdered there.

SoE: Actually they were built by prisoners of the Germans, which included Poles and Jews. Victims (of the typhus epidemic) were everyone, though the Polish Jews with their fear of showering and general lack of cleanliness succumbed to disease more than others in the supposed “killing factory” that they helped build.

Ironically, Storozynski is the victim and perpetuator of Orwellian doublespeak as he holds myth as reality and fails to see it. Goy.

On Sept. 1, 1939, the German blitzkrieg stormed into Poland to burn down cities, enslave the populace, build gas chambers to murder Jews and execute Christian Poles that helped them. Two weeks later, Soviet Russia sent tanks into eastern Poland to execute the leadership and destroy its capitalist system. Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country and the Germans used Auschwitz to kill Polish soldiers and political prisoners, before constructing gas chambers to murder Jews.

SoE: So now the Germans invaded Poland just so they could build gas chambers? Despite the fact that they had their own, ones they NEVER used for murder. Read up on the German company Degesch or on American industrial gas chambers from that era and see that those small stone rooms in Auschwitz and other camps look nothing like them.

At least, Storozynski is right in saying that the USSR invaded Poland, it’s true, but he fails to see why the great Western Allies didn’t declare war on the Soviet invader like they did on the German.

And actually, the USSR fought Germany longer than Poland, as did the Western Allies, but maybe Storozynski just used shorthand for “Poland fought Nazi Germany longer than any other country at the start of war” despite the fact that he admitted to not approving of shorthand due to the inaccuracies it causes.

Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “in the big lie there is a certain force of credibility, because the broad masses of a nation are easily corrupted … and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie.”

SoE: Yes, Hitler did write that, but maybe you’d care for context and accuracy? That part of the quote DOES NOT end with a period, there is a comma and the quote continues:

“…since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick-a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of.

The foremost connoisseurs of this truth regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews; for after all, their whole existence is based on one single great lie, to wit, that they are a religious community.”

Der Fuhrer was talking about the Jew’s method of lying and not about his own Noble Kampf. Goys never learn.

Hitler vowed to get rid of “Jews, Polacks and riff-raff.” He would be pleased that today American newspapers blame Poles for his Nazi death camps rather than the Germans. The Nazis themselves gave the camp a German name, “Auschwitz” and then hung a sign over the entrance in German, “Arbeit Macht Frei.” Calling it Polish is either lazy or malicious.

This past week, on Oct. 20, The New York Times ran an obituary of Dr. George Mathe, which said that he had been sent to “a Polish concentration camp in a cattle car.” The shifting blame is getting so bad that in June, The Los Angeles Times even ran a piece in which its “Culture Monster” reviewer F. Kathleen Foley used the phrase “Nazi Poland.” This is libelous. The Los Angeles Times corrected the mistake on its web site. In May, The Wall Street Journal used the phrase “Polish concentration camp.” Polish-Americans protested outside the newspaper’s offices, however The Wall Street Journal refuses to remove the defamatory phrase from its web site. The Polish Consul General in New York, Ewa Junczyk-Ziomecka wrote a letter to the editor saying that the Journal is “indicating that Poland was a participant in the Nazi crime. In reality, my country was Hitler’s most brutalized victim with more than six million Polish citizens losing their lives during the war.”

Of the six million Poles killed during World War II, about half were Jewish while the rest were Christian. German soldiers also transported Jews from 27 other countries into Nazi occupied-Poland to be murdered in deaths camps like Auschwitz. Because Poland resisted Germany, Hitler ordered his army to bomb and burn Warsaw to the ground.

SoE: More “death camp” nonsense. Also, it’s a tough pill to swallow, but Poland could have saved herself by not ignoring Hitler and actually negotiating with him on his demands. Love him or hate him, Hitler was your neighboring leader and instead of making shady deals with Churchill and DeGaulle, my dear and beloved, but sometimes painfully naive Homeland, you should have not ignored your neighbor. One who proved to be very capable and who could have helped you fend off Soviet aggression.

This issue of historic accuracy was taken up by the United Nations, and in 2007, UNESCO officially changed the name of the Auschwitz to “The Auschwitz-Birkenau German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945).”

SoE: Well that’s an unpleasant mouthful that the Jews force fed us.

Jewish leaders have also spoken out on this issue. In Jan. 2005, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, David A. Harris, issued a statement which said in part, “We would also like to remind those who are either unaware of the facts or careless in their choice of words, as has been the case with some media outlets, that Auschwitz-Birkenau and the other death camps, including Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka, were conceived, built and operated by Nazi Germany and its allies. The camps were located in German-occupied Poland, the European country with by far the largest Jewish population, but they were most emphatically not ‘Polish camps’. This is not a mere semantic matter. Historical integrity and accuracy hang in the balance.”

SoE: LOL! A nightmare perpetuating Zionist Jew talking about “historical accuracy.” This may very well have just made my day.

In April 2006, Executive Director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham H. Foxman, wrote: “As an agency which prioritizes remembrance of the Holocaust, we share Poland’s concerns over the frequent description of the camp as a “Polish” camp. Such a description implies that the camp was built in the name of the Polish people. As you know, this is manifestly not the truth. Auschwitz stands as a monument to the barbarity of Nazi Germany. We therefore respectfully request that the camp be officially referred to as the ‘Former Nazi German Extermination Camp, Auschwitz-Birkenau.’ ”

While there were Poles who committed atrocities against Jews during and after World War II, the Polish government convicted and executed those who killed Jews. The Polish underground established the Council to Aid Jews, Zegota, which rescued thousands of Jews. Irena Sendler saved 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto. Jan Karski sneaked through enemy lines to beg Churchill & Roosevelt to stop the Holocaust. They did nothing. Polish Army Captain Witold Pilecki volunteered to be arrested by the Germans and sent to Auschwitz to try to organize a prison break. The Germans executed thousands of Poles who tried to save Jews. The phrase “Polish concentration camp” desecrates their memory.

SoE: Goy Storozynski has been effectively conditioned to believe that disgust with Jews is completely unfounded and irrational. He also thinks that ethnic Russians (albeit Soviets) were responsible for the massacre at Katyn, which decapitated the leadership of Poland. It was, in fact, atheistic Jews that were the majority of Soviet Commissars. He also fails to see that Germans could have easily done the same kind of mass-killing in their half of newly conquered Poland, but didn’t.

The Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita has published editorials calling for legal action against newspapers that use these defamatory phrases. But it doesn’t have to end this way. Newspaper publishers and the Associated Press can easily rectify this situation by changing their stylebooks to banish the phrase “Polish concentration camps.”

Some editors justify the use of this phrase as a geographic location of the camps. But while editors can find lots of reasons to avoid doing the right thing and banning these phrases from news stories, there are six million reasons why they should.

SoE: The only reason these phrases are “defamatory” is because your perception of WW2 is hopelessly misguided. The phrases should be corrected, yes, but not to stop defamation, but to make them accurate. This also involves getting rid of death camp lore. Six million lies is enough.

———————————————————
Article originally published on October 24th, 2010 in the blog section of The Huffington Post.
———————————————————

I refer to this article (new link OO link broken) by Kevin MacDonald posted on Occidental Observer. Kevin MacDonald refers to two other research papers for the basis of his research and hypothesis.

“Research on Individualism/Collectivism has become a rather large economic industry” – Kevin MacDonald.

Kevin immediately admits to the biased nature of this so-called ‘research’ by naming it ‘economic industry’, what is being manufactured here? I know what ‘economic industry’ means in this world, it means; manufacture and trade for profit, and profit is defined in this present world economic paradigm as IMF$’s, as that is the “world’s reserve currency.” Currently everything on the planet is measured in IMF$’s, Kevin’s ‘research’ is measured in IMF$’s. And Kevin’s research is based upon economic research manufactured by Gerard Roland & Yuriy Gorodnichenko, who both as it so happens staff for the same University as Kevin; the University of California, in economics, or the ‘economic industry’. But Gerard Roland’s main JOB is with the IMF, in the same manner as Kevin MacDonald offers sycophant advice on reform to Zionist cultural programs, Gerard Roland and his assistant Yuriy offer sycophant advice on reform to Zionist banking programs. The publisher is the Center for Economic Policy Research who are a think tank for the IMF, the World Bank, WTO, BIS, EU Central Bank, UN, etc. They all work for the Zionist Central Banking system…

As one would expect, this article and by Kevin MacDonald and the IMF research papers he refers to are complete hogwash! What are they trying to do is dress up the swine, it’s Zionist Banking propaganda, what we see is a basic counterfeiting operation being run for private gain through theft and deception, and the ‘perps’ would like to give it a public face – that’s what a university ‘reasearch scholar’ does and recieves his IMF$’s to do it, doesn’t matter what old bullshit they can spin, it does not matter what they think up to dress up the pig, or which hat they put on the strawman. So they name it in a typical double speak fashion – “Culture, Institutions, and the Wealth of Nations”, No, its plain old Central Banking fraud is what it is, and Central Banking is the first pillar of Marxism i.e. Communism!

“Marxism, whose final objective was and is and will continue to be the destruction of all non-Jewish national States.” - Adolf Hitler

Most of these scholars, who all work Jobs for the Zionist Central Banks, manufacture fairly poor, ill-conceived propaganda, they are desperate to please Master, so they just come up with all types of disinformation in the hope that Master will be pleased with one, and the Master Rabbi knows that if the ‘economic industry’ researchers are always coming up with new ideas no matter how wrong they are, the point is that they always change the ‘dress up’, window dressing for passer-by Goyim, but the more confusing and irrelevant the better, as long as it is something different, anything but call it as it really is!

“The purpose of this doctrine was not understood because nothing was said about that side of the question in our Jew-ridden universities and because supercilious bureaucratic officials did not think it worth while to read up a subject which had not been prescribed to them in their university course. This might revolutionary trend was going on beside them; but those ‘intellectuals’ would not deign to give it their attention.” - Adolf Hitler

When the sycophant servile parasite offers criticism and advise in a hopeful attempt to add reform to the concepts, doctrines, decrees and establishments of his/her Master, it is not designed to overcome the will of the Master but to strengthen Master’s resolve to implement his will, the doctrine or decree is first tempered to increase its resistance powers, give it some immunity, and also to disguise it, mask its true intent and confuse the target population.

“That is why in this case, as with all other growths, the doctrine can be exterminated in its earliest stages. As time goes on its powers of resistance increase, until at the approach of age it gives way to younger elements, but under another form and from other motives.” - Adolf Hitler

Because of Marxism’s inherent decay, the Marxist doctrines begin to decay immediately once they are implemented, they cause very high entropy, because of this rapid aging process and the destructive outcomes that result, the Marxist doctrines need an army, an entire ‘economic industry’ working on their reform and disguise, or just simply make a lot of noise, to distract attention away from the real outcomes and root causes, the idea is to prevent any real acknowledgement of the problem of the Marxist Zionist doctrine, in this case Central Banking counterfeiting operations; just don’t expose it, that is their motto, i.e. talk about something else. The controlled opposition like Kevin MacDonald and the University of California and other ‘economic industry’ workers are employed to offer ineffectual opposition – they’re sycophant servile employees! They can propose reforms aimed at strengthening the original doctrine and disguising it, or thay can make a false strawman to cause a distraction or direct any opposition to a false outcome, or they can just speak a lot of Babel and make alot of noise, to cause confusion and distraction, that is their JOB, for the most part.

“When sheer force is used to combat the spread of a doctrine, then that force must be employed systematically and persistently. This means that the chances of success in the suppression of a doctrine lie only in the persistent and uniform application of the methods chosen. The moment hesitation is shown, and periods of tolerance alternate with the application of force, the doctrine against which these measures are directed will not only recover strength but every successive persecution will bring to its support new adherents who have been shocked by the oppressive methods employed. The old adherents will become more embittered and their allegiance will thereby strengthen. Therefore when force is employed success is dependents on the consistent manner in which it is used. This persistence, however, is nothing less than the product of definite spiritual convictions. Every form of force that is not supported by a spiritual backing will always be indecisive and uncertain.” - Adolf Hitler

“The best way to control an opposition is to lead it” - Vladimir Lenin

Lets look at some ineffectual misinformation from sycophant Kevin MacDonald;

“In support they (fellow IMF employees Gerard Roland & assist. Yuriy) note several anecdotal examples where technological innovations in the Western societies led to products that were produced more efficiently in Japan. As another example, they note that General Motors was unable to introduce Toyota culture based on teamwork and consensus into the United States.” – Kevin MacDonald

What is this? HOGWASH!!!!! Here we have a Zionist Social sycophant quoting a Zionist Banking sycophant amounting to total disinformation! Kevin even admits to it; ‘anecdotal example’, is the opposite to scientific evidence, it is based on individual experience or stories – here say, and statements by employers showing bias! Misleading and suggestive! It was in reality an American – Henry Ford who developed the entire process of assembly line mass production of automobiles – the doctrine is called “Fordism”, initially the concept was Optimization, an Aryan concept that was adopted and distorted by Communists and Zionist after Henry Ford died. The Ford Motor Company was incorporated in 1903 long before any Japanese person had even driven in an automobile let alone make one! The methods used by Henry Ford became known around the world, and were adopted around the world, in countries like Japan, especially after they were colonized by America after their WWII defeat. The Toyota Motor Company is owned by the US Government, it has been so ever since Japan became a working colony of the U.S. Government and the Federal Reserve and the IMF and the BIS. Kevin MacDonald is suggesting that the Japanese folks are more genetically predisposed to ‘team-work’ and ‘concensus’ and are more effecient than an American???? This is not observable phenomena, and there is no evidence to prove this is the case! Complete rubbish!

Japan in no way can be compared to America in this regard, as a country it is no more or less efficient than America, the demographics and the racial characteristics and the environments are entirely different, both States are however controlled by the same system and the same Zionists. The people of each State are no more or less ‘collective’ or ‘individualized’ then each other, all people have the ability to work collectively or work individually and independently, there is no one group of people more or less inclined towards this ability.

It was not ‘Toyota culture’ that was transported to America by Japan, that’s disinformation, it was American mass production assembly line culture – Fordism that was forced onto the Japanese people, their own Japanese family owned and run automobile factories were simply taken over, with what was the “Flexible System of Production” of America, this became the “Japanese Management System”! Are folks in Japan any more inclined to a Henry Ford designed system than folks in America, no, of course not…Toyota is no different now to General Motors, both are owned by the U.S. Government wich is owned by the U.S. Federal Reserve, which is a privately owned and operated counterfeiting factory. The Japanese are no better or worse than any other people in being the unfortunate victims of an international swindle and fraud, being ‘collectivized’ or ‘individualized’ is HOGWASH! Its mindless Babel! In the case of Kevin MacDonald, I wouldn’t even rate it as artful propaganda, he is just hired opposition “greased” to say as many stupid things as possible to discredit any meaningful opposition, just drown it out with babel, so as to confuse them! Think – Alex Jones = ‘MacDonald’s Culture’

“My argument that European tendency toward individualism is the result of lessened importance of group-based competition during the Ice Ages for the ancestors of Europeans because large kinship-based groups would not have been supported because of ecological constraints imposed by a cold climate.” - Kevin MacDonald

What??? That’s Kevin’s argument, that is his hypothesis based on his ‘anecdotal evidence’ and some special lab results, where ‘Europeaness’ is ‘measured’ in a test tube at California University! With historical view compiled by the Disney Corporation in Hollywood! What utter and complete moronic garbage!

Kevin MacDonald’s European Ice Age.

“Jews are particularly important because of their elite status in terms of wealth as well as their influence on the media and on the political process. As non-Europeans become the majority in traditional European societies, there is no reason to suppose that they will retain individualist political and cultural institutions. As they say, demography is destiny.” - Kevin MacDonald

Altruism, that is non-Aryan see Glossary. Secular Humanism – Kevin MacDonald quotes Augustus Comte – Utopian Socialism, Masonic Republican, Jacobite Zionist Freemason, an influence on Karl Marx. Augustus Comte another mad French Freemason who did everyone a favour when he threw himself off a bridge in a suicide attempt, unfortunately he survived, and is now a revered High Priest of Marxism and Zionist Masonic Social engineering, the same Masters that Kevin MacDonald serves, not suprising that MacDonald would quote Comte.

What is Humanism? – it is Tribalism with the tribe defined as humanity. That is a central tenet of Marxism and Judaic tribalism.

Jews do not have an elite status due to their wealth, human wealth is purely the product of human work! The Zionist Jews do not have wealth, they have no wealth and that is why they steal it through counterfeiting operations! They steal human wealth! And who says non-Europeans will become the majority in Europe and therefore change European traditions? - The Zionists that’s who, that is their aim, will they be successful, NO! Just shear demographic numbers makes no difference, Henry Ford just proved that exact point, one man’s idea become the very culture of an entire country on the other side of the Pacific Ocean! Optimization – Aryan – planning concept based on ensuring no more resources are used than is requires to fulfill the purpose. Henry Ford developed and Aryan concept that was later hijacked and turned into a Zionist abomination in a desperate attempt to overcome the inherent failures of Marxism! But nothing can help them in the long run, nothing!

Here is an example of faulty Masonic reasoning; if there is more of something, that must mean it is better, the more people than the more successful they are as a people – that’s a Jewish idea! The Aryan thinking is completely different, the opposite – Optimization, quality, – it is better to have a small group of Noble beings than a billion ignoble Peoples.

The mass abundance that was produced due to the doctrine of Henry Ford was due to optimization of resources and labour, the fact that is was adopted and used for the purpose of exploitation of Goyim is not the fault of Henry Ford, it is the fault of the exploiters!

Like I said I wouldn’t even give Kevin MacDonald the credit of calling him an able propagandist, I think he is used as hired opposition because he his a narrow-minded, obedient, indoctrinated gentile with sycophant tendencies! He makes the perfect strawman opposition, Kevin reminds me of giant pinata, something a child could hit at a party blindfolded, it’s so easy, surely you cannot miss it.

I recently had an unexpected chance to go to the Zionist Propaganda Museum in Majdanek, just outside of Lublin, Poland. I took the opportunity and the visit was interesting, to say the least. By today, the city of Lublin has grown much and practically reaches vast open field that is the former internment camp from the Second World War, though this area was never really as far removed from urban areas as the other camps of its kind. The official information at the camp even makes note of this “exception.” On the way to the museum one can read the official name that has been given to this place, “Majdanek Museum of Martyrdom.” If you are coming from center city Lublin as I was, you have to drive along the field for a while before coming to the main visitors’ entrance. Along this stretch there is a great stone monument that will aptly sum up the rest of your visit: impact.

Not information, but impact. Be it visual or from the mouth of a tour guide, impression making tools await to mold your perceptions so that they are as guided as the tour itself.

The Majdanek camp was turned into a museum in August of 1944, well before the war even ended, and less than a month after the Soviets captured the area. This was done under the direct supervision of the Soviet Propaganda Machine, which would go on to serve as a main provider of “evidence” against the Schutzstaffel in 1945. Immediately local, regional and national publications churned out Soviet approved stories of what went on in the camp and all this information was promptly used to demonize the Nazis. This may also explain why Stalin was so intent on keeping Eastern Europe under his control, it gave him exclusive control over the so-called “death camps” and what evidence was extracted from them and then used against the Germans.

Interestingly, Majdanek is one of those infamous “death camps” that supposedly had a homicidal chamber and massive crematorium going on overtime to exterminate any and every person that the Nazis disapproved of. Let’s take a look at the official camp tally.

Numbers Speak

78,000 dead. Given poor and dirty wartime conditions, which included a typhus epidemic and the Jews’ own lack of cleanliness, this number can begin to make sense. Odd is the fact that the Polish word by this figure is “zgine?o” meaning “died” (there is no “killing” implied), yet the English version, and the one most international tourists invariably read, implies murder. The other translated pairs match up accurately, says this native Polish speaker.

45,000 transferred to other camps. Wait, transferred? I thought this was a Nazi Murder Machine death camp? Hmm… maybe I was wrong.

500 escaped. Ah, yes, a few rogues are always to be found. Also, it seems security wasn’t that intense: escaping from a guarded labor camp that’s next to a militarily occupied city in the middle of an occupied country and remaining officially declared as escaped seems like the Germans were not so intent on killing everyone in this camp. In additon, nothing was mentioned about what these escapees said… did they testify at Nuremberg? To the Soviets? If so what did they say and what was done with that information? Did it just not align with the propaganda so it was swept under the rug and the escapees then sent by Stalin to Siberia so as to remain forever quiet? Questions, questions; ones that demand answers.

18,000 released. Ok, seriously. They actually release people from “death camps” now? Why would those fiendishly evil, mass-murdering Nazis hell-bent on genocide ever do that? Well, if they were not “hell-bent on genocide” than this board of numbers is starting to make sense.

1,500 liberated. The Soviets “saved” less people than the Nazis. How amusing. Though this was, in all probability, just the amount people who were there when the Soviets showed up and after the Nazis retreated. Many more were likely to have left the first chance they got, meaning right after the SS cleared out. There was a big city nearby to go to… why wait inside a prison then if the door’s open?

One should also note the numbers, all nicely rounded, thus making them estimates at best. Odd, that a world famous museum has a mistranslation and estimates as main parts of its information and message, especially since it exhibits a topic that countless scholars were said to have accurately studied and reported.

Also, back to that mistranslation, this was not the first time I had seen a suspicious mistranslation related to WW2 labor camps. I say suspicious since it effectively makes the information presented not objective. In the movie Shutter Island from 2010 there is some back story involving the Dachau Massacre and in the dialog the main character first says “death camp” in English and then in German as “Konzentrationlager.” Strange, since the German translates to simply “Concentration Camp” (the direct literal translation), but the term “Internment Camp” can also be used. Ever wonder why the Allied forces have “Concentration Camps” but the Germans have “Death Camps?” It’s WW2 Allied propaganda still in play and it has become firmly rooted into peoples’ psyche. Even if one looks at the fact that the German camps did have more death, especially towards the end of the war, it’s because German resources were stretched very thin and often down right destroyed from the air courtesy of the Allies and their aerial assaults even on civilian areas. Dresden would be the most infamous example from the latter category here: people flooded to the Saxon city as refugees as it remained the one major supply hub for civilians in the area, and then the city was bombed despite having no military or strategic importance. If civilians fared this well from the efforts of the “heroic” Allied forces, then how might you think prisoners had it?

Mistranslation here, misunderstanding there, white washing here, exaggeration there… WW2 history is plagued by these things and all those little mistakes play against the reputation of the Germans and those who were at arms with them. This cannot be a grand coincidence. It’s deliberate LIES.

The gate to the main compound in Majdanek has a sign that says, among other things, that no one under 14 years of age will be admitted. Given the horror stories visitors hear inside, this may very well be some good sense, but something else made me think different.

There was an Israeli student tour group at the camp and all the kids looked junior high school age more or less, 14 or just a bit older. Interesting fact of psychology is that kids learn quickest and are most impressionable when they are under 12. The brain is still developing and many childhood lessons go on to define the shape of the adult to come. Israel is insanely particular about controlling the flow of information pertaining to it or information that it has interest in. Just look at any one of the countless “controversial incidents” involving the IDF, the smell of a cover-up or lies seems to be practically synonymous with such things. Jack Bernstein, an American Jew (and a man who is clearly leaning more towards rationalism than Zionist Propaganda), was disgusted by Israeli power hungriness and lies, noted in his book that when he went to the supposed “haven” for Jews of the World, that tourism was strictly monitored, what people could see was tightly controlled, where they could go was very directed and under constant police supervision. Are we to believe that the Israeli educational system is all that different? Those kids when they are still under 12 must be drilled to the core with Holocaust lore and completely shaken up by all the gruesome Zionist hyperboles. Then when they finally come to these “museums” to “learn” the indoctrination doesn’t stop. Not at all.

There was a tour group of slightly older Polish students at Majdanek that day too and I linked up with them during one exhibit, the one containing the overview of the entire camp. The tour guide was being intensely emotional and his speech was punctuated with key words that go along with the museum’s design of teaching by shock and instilling a desire for a passionate reaction of hate or some sort of defense from fear. This “tour guide” with his sorrowful voice amounting to cheesy dramatic acting said that the camp commandant would take his young daughter to see mass executions of Jews (of course Jews, always Jews) and would even strategically cross the camp with her so they’d go through as much ground as possible so that maybe she’d get a glimpse of a “random lynching that the SS often carried out” on one of the numerous gallows that were “all over the camp.” So apparently, the men of Schutzstaffel weren’t just mass-murdering psychopaths, they were also the World’s worst parents.

In the moment, when I heard the last word of that anecdote uttered, I was convinced that Zionist Propaganda lost some of its usual bad taste and picked up a whole lot of idiocy to compensate.

There is one section of the camp that has been kept standing and the normal tour path goes through it, however, there were renovations being done there, so I just happened to come across it on a day when it was closed. The workers were making a new stone walkway through the camp grounds. I did notice, however, that there were none of the aforementioned gallows to be seen. The area was being renovated, but only a walkway down the center was being placed, the buildings by which the “numerous gallows” were said to have been were not being worked on. Another flub in Zionist Propaganda, in all likelihood.

The last site to visit here is the flagship of the tour and of Holocaust lore: the crematorium, where the industrially efficient mass-murder was said to have taken place. First off, the standard for “death camp” is incredibly shaky… if Auschwitz is a “death camp” with 1,000,000 dead, then how does Majdanek even begin to compare with 78,000? Majdanek is a lot smaller, so that could explain some discrepancy and it does have one of those supposed “gas chambers,” thus it doesn’t matter how many people died, but how they died. Ok, fair enough. Let’s look at a gas chamber from the era of when this camp was in operation.

This article, from the Commitee for Open Debate On the Holocaust, is lengthy and gets into serious details, but in the beginning there is a nice explanation of 1920s and 1930s era gas chambers, including ones that used Zyklon-B. Also is worth noting that they were made by Degesch, a German company. Thus Adolf Hitler, being the Fuhrer, effectively had unlimited access to this technology if he so desired. As did Heinrich Himmler, the SS Reichsfuhrer who oversaw the entire peniteniary system of the Third Reich.

I can tell you, dear reader, that there is nothing in Majdanek that even begins to resemble such a large and complex machine. There are some ovens, standard mortuary ovens, that were used for cremation. It was a very necessary process to contain disease and likely ALL dead were cremated, SS Man and prisoner (the city morgue in Lublin had also been likely ordered to burn bodies), since corpses can harbor massive amounts of germs and disease, especially when people died from typhus or any other deadly disease and each body in the ground was basically a lethal germ warehouse. The Germans went so far as to be thorough that they dug up previously buried dead and started to cremate them… hence the pictures of mounds of dead and crematory ovens going overtime. It was a massive and frantic effort of sanitation that, for all intents and purposes, was meant to save lives of all those in the area - German soldier, Polish citizen, and all prisoners be they POWs, political detainees or Jews.

One major reason that the gas chamber horror story remains official history is due to Soviet propaganda, which had enormous Jewish contributions. Soviet Commissars were greeted by Jews when Stalin invaded Poland, because many of them were Jews themselves. In fact, why didn’t the West declare war on the USSR which invaded Poland like Germany? Well, the fact is that Jews were riding high in the Soviet Union. However, Hitler had freed German society and culture from the highly disproportionate and destructive influence of the Jews and was promptly branded as the Devil. The International Jew’s War was with the Germans and their Fuhrer, the USSR merely provided one of the front lines of attack. Fortunately, some rationalism remained in the West and after the war on that side of the Iron Curtain the so called “death camps” were forensically examined to reveal no homicidal gas chambers, but ones for standard fumigation purposes meant to prevent the spread of disease. The USSR leadership, to help keep the focus away from monstrous Soviet crimes, did not permit Western forensic investigators to inspect the “death camps” in Poland, nor did they carry out such an investigation by themselves. They just rebuilt (often clumsily) the destroyed parts of many of the camps to accentuate their own anti-German propaganda, which then played a key role in the Nuremberg Show Trials.

Today, it is being used as indoctrination information and that Israeli student tour group are in effect, its latest victims. They’re kids, they don’t know better and out of all the students on this planet who “learn” about the “Holocaust” it is those Israelis that probably get drilled like no other. First when they are impressionable young children under 12 at home, then they go on these school trips so that they can evoke their first passionate internal reactions. Then they will return home, finish high school, and go on to carry out their required military service, but by then they’ll be packed with as much Jewish fanaticism, persecution myth and blind devotion to the blue hexagram as is possible. They are victims because they are being deliberately misinformed so that they can perpetuate the Zionist crimes and related madness. They are being primed to be hate-filled IDF criminals and then life-long Zionist fanatics.

The intensity of “education” can be seen even right during the tour. One girl started to cry, others sang a requiem of some sort by the crematorium ovens. There was also a little bit of vandalism I spotted: there were these signs in a side room, shaped like gravestones, and each one had the name of one of the nationalities of “Holocaust” victims. The sign for The Germans was scratched and some of the letters had been scraped off. Some apt pupil had already learned what his masters want him to do.

Questioning the official mythos of this propaganda is a punishable crime in virtually every Western nation, except the United States where rational investigators are merely shunned, stigmatized, and passively secluded from their job, their peers, and the decent life the may have had before they asked a “wrong” question or two. Or reached an “improper” conclusion, however logical it may be. In Poland, an example of academic fortitude, Professor Dariusz Ratajczak, who published a booklet called “Tematy Niebezpieczne” (Eng. - “Dangerous Topics”) in March of 1999, which raised questions about the official Zionist Approved Story, saw his life disintegrate professionally and personally for just over 10 years until his murder, which was officially declared a suicide. The Israeli Mossad was known to be operating in Poland, a supposed ally to Israel, but the Zionists spy and perpetrate crimes against everyone, so are we really all that surprised?

There are still rationalist investigators for the truth working out there, like David Irving and Fredrick Toben. Both did time in prison and both push on in their mission of enlightening the World. They are also more known worldwide than Ratajczak was, so their prospective lethal subversion by the Mossad would not be as covert as the Zionist fanatics normally like their crimes to be.

Truth doesn’t fear investigation, yet “the Holocaust” does. What does that tell you? Even if you don’t see the folly of it all.

Posted by Miecz Elizejski.

We are in a War of Words. There are many frontlines in this highly amorphous conflict. The Political Front may be the most obvious, but I believe that storytelling is also vital for this.

“An important prerequisite of a movement is a common vocabulary. The ability to form a unified front against Zionism, as well as the pursuit of Aryanism, requires clean and accurate expression of our positions. Emphasis must be placed on the use of common vocabulary by all supporters and allies of our movement.” ~Aryan Glossary

Thus vocabulary is absolutely indispensable to the Aryan Movement, but words are a means of accomplishing something. Much like the National Socialist view on money, as a tool to serve a purpose and the lifeblood of an economy, words are also a means of accomplishing something. The Movement may be small now, but as it grows, there will be ideas and goals keeping it standing and driving it forward. These ideas will have started as mere words and it is how we apply those words that will make the ideas and goals uniquely Aryan.

In this article the reader can find an overview of the Campaign we find ourselves in. These ideas, however, will apply a little differently depending on role an Aryanist within the movement. A medic, a rifleman, and a radio operator may all be on the same general front line and may all have learned many of the same skills in basic training, but when the going gets real, each has a critically different duty to carry out so that the campaign proceeds forward.

Historically, storytelling has been a vital part of culture. Ancient Greece may be long gone, but Homer’s Odyssey is still being read and discussed. Der Fuhrer Adolf Hitler may have passed from this Earth, but Mein Kampf still lives strong. It can be said that this book was a key element in National Socialist mobilization in 1920s Germany. Ideas amount to nothing unless they are communicated, and so Der Fuhrer did just that. He effectively spoke to an entire nation - no scratch that - to the entire World with his book. The work contains many forms of written word: story/recollection, philosophy and political rhetoric. When it was being written, the NS movement was small and had just been overpowered and repressed, so this vital cornerstone that would prop it back up had to arch over many aspects in order to contain the full founding philosophy of a movement - “first there was the Word.”

Mein Kampf was a major step in Adolf Hitler’s will to “recreate mankind anew.” The recreating of so many things anew needs to get more and more specific and storytelling is one of the next steps. I have looked at some films and media on this blog, in which I have identified both Aryan themes and ZC Propaganda. This is by no means an exhaustive examination of each story presented, but should serve as a springboard into the reader’s examination of their own favorite films. Note that Aryan themes are often subtle and in today’s mass-media they can usually be found in bits and pieces, here and there. Very few works are brimming with Aryanism, though there are exceptions like Cutthroat Island or ThunderCats.

Once a good sense of Aryanism is developped, identifying it in other streams of information should be easier. Today there is an immense amount of information flow, thus Aryanism has many potential routes, but also can be fairly easily drowned out in irrelevance. The mass-media is expert at creating programs that amount to Aldous Huxley’s imagined drug of Soma, thus it is easy to get lost and disoriented. On the other hand, this means that Aryanism, once spotted, is likely to be very obvious. Skepticism is always good for investigation, so take nothing at face value, but with a careful sense and dedication little shining embers of Arya will likely surprise you from very many different vantage points. Go to them!

Also important - Start to speak Aryan rhetoric so that when you are confronted by a Zionist or one of their lapdog goyim (i.e. an American neo-conservative) their words will be powerless. Kamerad Delendaestziobot wrote a good piece about rhetoric. Take careful note of how this applies to your chosen specialization within the Aryan Movement as well as generally. Again - medic, rifleman, radioman; all different, but part of the same unit.

Aryanism will only live if we live it. Or, the words of Ghandi, “You must be the change that you wish to see in the World.”

Tower of Babel

This is the Jew paradigm for goy management. It applies to politics (capitalism vs. communism, right vs. left, etc…) as well as culture (social strife, religious conflict, etc…). To put it in brief, it is an idea to keep the goyim perpetually busy and yet achieve no progress. As the story goes, the people wanted to build a great tower to reach the heavens, but YHWH the Jew idol, confused their speech and the tower was never finished. YHWH attacked their way with words to make unity impossible. Jew run politics today is much the same thing - we have so much technology and capacity and labor power as well as people needing the work and wages, yet what gets done? A recent and iconic example would be left-wingers arguing with conservatives over a Mosque in downtown Manhattan. This conflict also played out along religious lines. The Jew can’t eliminate the Gentiles’ word, so he strives to make it useless and impotent by degrading it down to bickering. He does this all while ever refining his own words. Thus, today’s Tower can be seen as one of language and words, those that are needed to form a unity against the Jews, or the Aryan term, Unity through Nobility.

Work, work, work… and never get anything done.

ZC Propaganda Inc. routinely demonizes and vilifies everything the Jew disagrees with and it is a near perfect transposition of Kosher Slaughter into the form of word and story. Just take a look at some of the films glorifying violence, and especially the Quentin Tarantino trashterpiece Inglorious Basterds. Tarantino showed the film in Israel and the Jews cheered during the final mass slaughter of a shootout, since, in a bit of childish revisionism, Tarantino has Hitler shot to pieces in a Paris movie theatre to conclude the movie. Jews hate Hitler and despite that he has been dead for so long they still want to kill him brutally. Or see him die. The Jewish pleasure with slaughter never ceases to disgust. They literally feed themselves off of it. I direct the reader to my post on The Carnegie Deli to see just that I mean with that last sentence.

The Aryan Counter-Paradigm

Unity through Nobility, as I have said, is the motto behind the Aryan Movement, but our goal is NOT another (and better, stronger, etc…) Tower of Babel. That would be pointless. Our Aryan Counter-Paradigm is a Distillation Tower; only the noblest make it to the top and pass on to the infinity of Arya. Jews would think we’re playing with and stacking blocks… how wrong they are! We are recreating mankind anew with a complex new order that once in place for a solid amount of time, it will be impossible to imagine a different one. Our new system, and the words and stories that we’ll create within it, our new Noble Culture, will be increasingly impossible for the Jews to degrade. They have gotten used to same old thing, for one, but also, not enough people have actually attacked the Jew where it hurts him most - his tools for creating lies, namely his use of words. Render his production facilities useless and he’ll have to give up, and knowing the immanent and self-preserving nature of the Jew, he will.

Will you meet us at the top?

One example of this is that the popular term “anti-Semitism” (which is absurd to begin with, but hey, the Jews created it) went from meaning “envy of Jewish success” to “disgust towards Jewish racism” and the new catch phrase “an anti-Semite is not one who hates Jews, but one whom Jews hate” quickly started to make headway. One step in distillation has been made, a little lie reversed and the new meaning pure, but the process continues.

Another important aspect is that the Zionists’ (both Jews and Gentiles) main strategy has been effectively compromised.

Summary of Zionist trick:
1) Promote a policy that they know most people are too degraded to successfully execute.
2) Blame the policy instead of the people for the failure, allow their agents to reverse the policy and thus gain public trust.

Summary of Aryanist countermeasure:
1) Blame the people instead of the policy for the failure.
2) Make the policy work by gathering sufficiently capable people.

This reverse bluff paradigm applies to virtually the whole field of anti-Zionism. An Aryanist should see how it applies in their specialized field.

On the storytelling front, Hollywood plays a major role and all the Jew owned studios routinely release films that echo what’s coming out of Washington DC. Just note the portrayal of Arabs throughout Hollywood’s history or for a specific example, just look at the film 300. I have a feeling that the recent film Prince of Persia: Sands of Time was a sort of apology from Hollywood about 300 and they finally showed Persia in a more pleasant light, however, they didn’t have any of the major roles played by Arabic actors and the main role went to Jew Jake Gyllenhaal and the film was produced by the Jew Jerry Bruckheimer. Oh, Hollywood.

There are films that do contain genuine Aryan themes, some of which I have looked at here. An Aryanist’s examination of some their favorite films might reveal a deeper reason why they like them. Or maybe show that a film is actually un-Aryan. My opinion of many films that I used to greatly enjoy has changed much since I became an Aryanist. Right around the time that I started to read beyond the mainstream about the Third Reich, Tarantino’s Jewish fantasy from 2009 hit screens, and while I still viewed National Socialism as wrong at the time, I was approaching it from a rationalist view point (unlike the being spoon fed propaganda view point I had before) and the gleeful violence ending the film literally made me sick. I was only once before so furious at the stupidity of a movie before and that was when I saw Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2 (another offering from Jew Bruckheimer) and it was also a spectacular disaster of gratuitous excess that all the goyim in the theatre cheered at. Perhaps, it’s odd that it took me this long to see past the goy illusion, literally it took all of college. Complex steps however, take time. As do campaigns. Aryanism is not an assembly line creation, it is expert craftsmanship and we are still all learning our trade. It took Adolf Hitler over ten years of hard work, which included prison time and the murder of Horst Wessel, among many other things, before his Kampf had a full scale mobilization. To create something genuine in a land of superficiality is hard work, especially when superficiality works day-to-day with illusion to create semblences of authenticity. And so it is, we must work hard and not lose our honorable standards. Never!

Prophet Mohammed, the Muslim’s first teacher, lived by a much higher standard than he demanded of his followers. He was at the top of his movement, but not from pulling favors, he was fit to lead by his own honorable actions.

Archetypes

The historical archetype for the Jew is the Herder, the sly manipulator and profiteer from slaughter. Today this has been transposed into things like the corporate overlord and sleazy politician. The process remains the same, however, profiting from lies.

The Gentiles are historical Hunters, and the ever scheming Herder has invited them onto his game preserve to chase after his own animals keeping the consumer goyim ever busy trying to sustain themselves all while paying the Herder.

Aryans, the historical Farmers, never cared for quantity so much as for quality. Thus, the Herder’s monopolization has pushed the Aryans into small pockets here and there. Chances are that if someone, somehow, discovers Aryanism, they’ll be alone in their immediate area.

What binds us is our writing, our words. Be they stories, philosophy, political rhetoric, or even a short humorous anecdote. Though, stories remain unique and ever important, since they do not merely communicate the possibility of an idea, they show the idea in action via the art of fiction. This is a powerful tool that can be used without the compromising of one’s own honor. Use it.

Posted by delendaestziobot.

I would like to submit a word: dissimulation. Dissimilar, dissimilitude, dissimilarity. Look at the picture, look at the word; dissimulation - 1. the act of dissimulating; feigning; hypocrisy. 2. Psychiatry. the ability or the tendency to appear mentally normal when actually suffering from a disorder, a characteristic of the paranoid. To dissimulate is to disguise or conceal under false semblance; dissemble. This is an important understanding for our present evil age – the depths of dissimulation. When the dissimulation is purposeful than it is ‘double think’; skillfully designed disguise presenting two contradictory beliefs as equally true at the same time with the aim of manufacturing cognitive dissonance. But Dissimulation is more likely to be the result a plain old paranoia – madness.

It’s neither Satire or Irony , it’s Dissimulation. This is Satire; “What an impressive wall, indeed worthy of the Holy Land, truly God is at work, those tilt-up concrete panels must have taken a crane operator at least 15 minutes to put each one in place. The Razor-wire cornices are a delightful detail, and the look-out tower; so high, I bet one could see all the way to Mount Sinai from up there! Truly the Chaldees could never knock these walls down, David would be impressed, and it only cost a Trillion $’s and a million lives to construct. And ‘Israel Ministry of Tourism’, sounds so inviting, just makes you want to drop everything and go on pilgrimage, just awesome, Shalom and peace be with you, holy, holy, holy is the Lord of Israel!”

No, what we have here is a system suffering from a severe disorder, the patient – the state of Israel is trying to feign normality, that is trying to pretend that it is perfectly normal, ordered and functional, it’s dissimulation however – paranoia is the diagnosis. It is actually the original definition of pure madness – Paranoia; the irrational or delusional belief that there is an immediate threat to oneself, a thought process heavily influenced by fear and anxiety – delusional. Paranoia from Greek, actually means – madness. In this type of illness, there is no apparent deterioration in intellectual abilities, unlike Depression or Schizophrenia. A simple characteristic of paranoia is where a delusional belief is the sole and most prominent feature presented and that the sufferer conclusively believes that this is normal. The condition may not always present itself as being purely persecuted, although that is often the case. The sufferer of the condition may think he/she is an important religious figure or a great artist when no such ability is present, it may be all of these delusions with unwarranted fears of persecution, this is madness – paranoia.

The dissimulation is the product of the paranoid mind, it’s not irony or satire, its pure madness that is presented in an act. This is what we see when we look at the walls that have been built-in the militarized State of Israel. The picture on our left of a Cubist sculpture is another example, titled – “Women’s Head”, the artist shows the signs of a mad paranoid, his act is one of dissimulation, he attempts to present an object that is dissimilar to the title, in a form that implies art, he has actually come to believe it is a woman’s head that he has created, and presenting, this is delusional, it’s not satire, and it’s not ironic, it is paranoia. In the same way the Israeli State has created concrete walls with razor wire and sniper towers to lock people both out and in and intimidate them in a show of aggressive militarized action. The presented action is a wall built for military purposes, however the Title, the communication is dissimilar – bright colours, friendly greeting, well wishing, presenting a place that is welcoming, a place of joy and happiness, offering pleasurable experience and safety. This is delusional, just like the Cubist sculpture is the result of a paranoid mind, so is the walls of Jerusalem the result of an anxiety and fear dominated paranoid mind. Another label for the Sculpture is “Anxiety”, the Label for the walls of Jerusalem will be more appropriate if it was “Anxiety Be With You”…

“Even to understand the word ‘double think’ involved the use of double think.” – George Orwell 1984

Dissimulation and paranoia is not exactly ‘double think’, it is not purposeful deceit, the actions are not one of a carefully constructed lie, no, the madness lies in the condition that the sufferer actually believes that both contradictory beliefs are equally true, it’s not a deliberate lie, it’s not propaganda, it’s just plain old common paranoia, madness. Now if one believes that instead of the paranoid sufferer being just mad but to the contrary that the sufferer is actually brilliant, sophisticated, genius, astute, intelligent, superior,etc, then that one would also be mad and delusional, as they actually believe in the paranoia of another and elevate it to being above their own. The truth is that the military State of Israel suffers from a bad case of Paranoia and presents acute signs of dissimulation that confirms this diagnosis. And it’s not just the State of Israel, it’s in fact much of the world unfortunately to different degrees, and that is why we should understand the meaning of the word – Dissimulation.

Posted by Delendaestziobot.

Propagandists should first consider the environment in which they operate, some propaganda methods become outdated and stale or are particular to certain times and environments, other methods are classic and are always applicable to all situations. We must do all we can to understand and use appropriately all propaganda methods available in their optimal time and place.

I will discuss some classic rhetoric methods and propaganda techniques that the Foe employs in propaganda war either knowingly or not, and that Aryans should be aware of lest he/she falls into the same trap. The amount of fallacy arguments a Foe can conceive is endless, so I cannot list them all, but I can outline some of the ones that are most relevant to us today. I use the term “Foe” generally as it could apply to any Zionist Gentile, Jew or Goyim.

Subject Switching:

This is the favourite technique of the modern Zionist controlled Media to maintain control in debate or interview – change the subject, i.e. talk about something else. This technique will be applied by a Foe when information or debate is not flowing in the direction that the Foe would like. Remember as soon as you give up the right to ask the questions you give someone else the right to ask them, you put yourself in the weakest position, you submit. An interviewer can control the direction of information if they have the sole right to ask the questions, the modern Media instantly assume this right and then naturally assume the position of power.

Subject Switching can be used to disrupt the flow of information or constructive dialogue between Aryans in an uninvited manner. Where there is unity, and planning, and progressive discussion and collaboration, the Foe will attempt to disrupt the pattern, disrupt the flow, simply by changing the subject matter. An artful propagandist Foe will use a ‘contiguous comment’ first so as not to appear crude, a contiguous comment is offered to shift focus in a different direction by asking a seemingly innocent question, that will invite a response that will change the subject. By answering you are seen to be the one who is introducing the new subject matter. The matter may be related to Aryanism for example, and may be of importance, but the aim of the foe was simply to disrupt the original flow of dialogue. Once subject matter has been changed successfully by the Foe, then it is a Hijack.

Hijacking:

A Hijacker may prevent final agreement or resolution on a subject, after successfully changing or switching the subject matter he/she will defend the motive for changing the subject with platitudes; “moving on”, “we have already discussed this”, blocking attempts to return to the original subject matter, humour may be used or inflammatory remarks, the aim of the Hijacker is always to prevent final agreement and/or resolution between Aryans.

Babel:

Babel is the confusion of terminology and language, once Aryans have agreed upon certain terms and definitions of language the Foe will try to confuse them or render them redundant, by not applying them, for example: “we need to preserve what is left of the White Aryan Race or it will vanish” – Foe. This is a total confusion of our Glossary, our Terms and definitions that we have already agreed to. Whether the statement is accidental due to ignorance or designed as purposeful propaganda Babel by a Foe, is not as relevent as the need to prevent it from damaging or confusing any terms, definitions, glossary, language already agreed to, this must not be changed or confused by anyone!

Dead Weight:

The Foe will display interest in Aryanism, even seem willing to participate and be active, however the aim of the Dead Weight is simply to be just that – a dead weight! contiguous comments may first be employed or seemingly innocent questions, however the Foe is only concerned with wasting time, taking everything and returning nothing, this type of Foe is the hardest to identify of all propaganda artists, they may offer artful praise and seem knowledgeable on the subjects relating to Aryanism but their contribution is always circular, never progressive or constructive. The Aryan should watch for this type of behaviour, the Dead Weight may want to add foreign material to Aryanism as further baggage and weight, again the aim will always be to keep the direction circular and slow.

Strawman:

This will be the most common method of propaganda used against Aryanism, the Strawman is fallacy based upon misrepresentation of an opponent’s position. Example of a Strawman;

A. Statement. – “Aryans seek to re-create the ideals of the Aryan Race through unity and nobility” – Aryan
B. Reply. – “Aryans like Hitler want to breed a ‘Master Race’ based upon racial ideology” - Foe.

Again the Aryan should not commit to the fallacy, to the illusion of the Strawman whether it is intentional or due to misunderstanding. The Strawman misrepresents the statement of the Aryan. Another example of this method would be when Alfred Rosenberg referred to Russian Communists as “Untermensch” - “under-man”, quoting Lothrop Stoddard; “The Under-Man – the man who measures under the standards of capacity and adaptability imposed by the social order in which he lives.” The propaganda Foe misrepresents this as “The Nazi’s sought to eliminate sub-humans!”. This is a Strawman, it’s simply not true at all, “Untermensch” is not defined in racial terms but in social order, neither is it defined as being less than human or not human as ‘sub-human’ implies.

The Strawman is the invention of a fiction that is then applied to a person or persons as if it was their own creation. This can be in the form of words or actions that are falsely attributed to the Aryan. This is the most effective of propaganda methods in employment by the enemy presently! Aryans therefore must be aware of this method and how to counter it. The counter is related to all other previous methods I have mentioned i.e. strict adherence to correct terminology, good grasp of Aryan philosophy and the language of Aryanism used within our movement. The Propagandist, indeed any Aryan must be able to define his/her position, aim, philosophy and stick to it, and not be swayed by illusion and fallacy.

Non-sequitor argumentum:

Non-sequitor is Latin for it does not follow, the conclusion does not follow the premise in Non-sequitor argument it is a logical fallacy or a jump in logic. The world is awash with this type of illogical thinking, but the defense of Israel’s Navy military attack on the civilian Freedom Flotilla give an excellent example;

A. Statement. - “It’s not acceptable for Israeli armed commandos to commit murder of unarmed civilian aid workers and peace activists in international waters.” – Aryan
B. Reply. – ”The Israeli’s had paint-ball guns and only a side-arm for their own protection, they were soldiers protecting their country, getting beat to death with pipes and boards, and thrown overboard by a bunch of so-called “peace-niks”. The “Peace-niks” were obviously attacking and the Israelis defended themselves! Anyway the ships were carrying missiles to Gaza for Hamas to use.” – Foe.

So this is a reply argument that does not follow in logic to the premise of the first statement, the reply is a total non-sequitor from start to finish, you cannot respond to this argument because it is completely illogical, all one can do is point out that the argument used against the first statement is a non-sequitor and illogical. There is no point in addressing all the fallacies, once the Foe has displayed this kind our contempt for the first Statement and not followed the reason and logic but answered with a barrage of illogical unrelated babel, it’s pointless to respond any further, the Foe is already in error, there is nothing further to do, the Foe loses any right to further debate based upon his/her use of Non-sequitor argumentum.

By understanding and following these rhetorical arguments the Aryan Propagandist will clearly be more successful in the future not only against enemy propaganda but also any ‘friendly fire’ so to speak, or not make the same mistake accidentally themselves, Aryans themselves should not use these methods against anyone on purpose, they are the Foe’s methods and should be refuted, one can only refute the methods employed by the Foe if they understand those methods correctly.

“This is my hand. I can turn it. The blood is still running in it. The sun is still in the sky and the wind is blowing. And I…I, Antonius Block, play chess with Death.” - The Seventh Seal

New York City, a sprawling metropolis, there are so many places and things to see here that it would take probably a lifetime. There is one particular little locale, however, that I would like to bring to my fellow Aryanists’ attention. It is some ten blocks up 7th Avenue from Times Square, right by the southwestern corner of the intersection with 55th Street. A new visitor is likely to spot the huge sign to the Wellington Hotel just across the street from this place, but there is a red awning that extends out onto the sidewalk with the sign: Carnegie Deli. There is even another small sign just above it reading: World’s Best. Seeing how it’s in the middle of New York City, some blunt capitalist jargon is not really all that out of place.

Inside is where the place starts to actually get interesting. There is a delicatessen where a customer can by something like they do in a market, but most people proceed to the restaurant that makes up most of the locale’s interior. I’ve been inside three times at various hours from early afternoon to evening and the place has always been packed. The first thing that can be seen here are the pictures on the wall, they’re everywhere, virtually every bit of wall space had a framed photo of a celebrity who was here at some point. Certainly a unique interior design choice, not many places that I’ve been to have it, but it also hit me that this is perfect appeal to the vanity and attention obsessed Facebook generation, which was made possible by digital photography; copious amounts of pictures can be taken and loaded up online for display and delusions of fame. Popular media also is keen on covering celebrity stories and what movie stars do with their personal lives, what they wear, and where they go out. So this business, keen on trends, made sure to tap into that and maximize profit.

However, the real meat of the matter is just that, meat. Lots of it. A sickening amount of it. Not only is nearly every dish meat based, the portions are, to put it lightly, absolutely absurd. Ironically, “carne” is a root meaning “meat.” Now, I used to eat meat, I used to like meat, but even during the times when I found great enjoyment in a steak dinner or any well-made meat dish, I still found the portions here insane.

Just take a look at one of their sandwiches:

Kosher, meaning “Gluttonous Indulgence from Slaughter”

To any Aryanist, it should be no surprise that this Den of Indulgence is Jew-themed. The whole menu is kosher and one of the house specialty dishes is called “The Woody Allen” referring to one of New York’s most famous Jewish residents. The free appetizer given to each table is a set of pickles, which are very common in Eastern European Slavic culture, but did you actually expect the Jews to not plagiarize or manipulate something?

I usually talk about films here, but I found this restaurant relevant, since the place overall does convey a message, a most un-Aryan message, and one that can be summed up as: “Consume you goyim!” The monstrous portions, appeal to superficiality, mounds of kosherized flesh all amount to ZC approved culture. This isn’t the only place to do so, but from this example, an Aryanist should easily be able to see others like it, even if they do not contain all of the elements that this place does. The trend of large portions is especially popular in American restaurants and people are actually asking questions like “Why is there so much obesity?” This is when Aryanists usually facepalm.

Also, I have sort of confessed to eating at this kosher lair a few times, two times was before I became an Aryanist. The last time, however, was not too long ago and that’s when I got the idea for this article. I wanted to show a friend of mine something “exclusively New York” but soon realized it was a mistake. I ordered the Central Park Garden Salad, one of few dishes without meat and the only one I remember having no goy-products, though for an extra $8 they’ll serve it to you with grilled chicken! Another facepalm.

This may be a weird suggestion to my fellow Aryanists, but you should check this place out. If you eat, it’ll probably be that salad I had, but the point is to see everything our movement disapproves of and seeks to correct with human civilization. This may help you see your own position better, a “know thy enemy” sort of thing. I, for one, wrote this little essay due to my last (and it will remain my last) visit there. Though, there is no shortage of locales like this one, so if you do not wish to feed the ZC Beast, which is probably a smarter move, then may I suggest, going on an investigative trip to any other restaurant of your choosing. It may seem obvious or even pointless, but a closer inspection at the very apparent lack of Aryan Frugality in our civilization just may tell you something that was too obvious to take note of in the first place. This goes for many of the issues we face. But noting such a thing, often results in something useful, even if just on a personal level. Aryanism is not just a spiritual or political movement, as Der Fuhrer spoke many many years ago, it is the will to recreate mankind anew! Thus, there is nowhere we shouldn’t look for possibility improvement.

Posted by delendaestziobot.

Kevin MacDonald writes a great deal on Jewish activities, Jewish racialism, Jewish psychology, Jewish history, Jewish Zionism, Israel, Jews in America, Jewish customs, laws, Jewish humour, etc, etc, if it’s of Jewish concern and interest than Kevin Macdonald has probably written or spoken about it at one time or another, he talks a great deal about Jews and Zionism, and because he is non-Jewish himself, this has attracted some criticism from Jewish sources who are very sensitive when it comes to matters like this; a non-Jew for example discussing Jews and offering criticism. So it is that Kevin MacDonald has attracted some criticism in return from certain sensitive Jewish sources, but at the same time he has received praise from other Jewish sources, who welcomed such timely criticism, they themselves as Jews, saw the need for reform at various times and did not mind that a Gentile was reiterating their own convictions. In fact all Jews seem to find something in Macdonald’s work that they cannot help but agree with, even Jews who of course yell and shriek ‘anti-Semite’, ‘neo-nazi’, ‘racist’, when they hear any Gentile even dare mention anything at all other than praise, even these Jews on reflection usually find themselves agreeing with Macdonald’s academic arguments, sometimes cheering him on, sometimes even considering him a guilty pleasure, yes, many Jews, especially the hawkish Zionist, the cynical Zionist would and does find Macdonald’s writings very appealing, even though he is a Gentile.

What is the basis of Macdonald’s academic arguments and critique? He is an advocate of “evolutionary psychology” and he has sought to explain the Jewish mind and behaviour in purely biological Darwinian evolutionary terms. And he basically comes to the conclusion that Jews behave as they do because they are hard-wired to do so, just another biological group competing with other biological groups for food, resources and mating partners. And from this Darwinian perspective Macdonald than argues that the reason why Jews have experienced anti-Semitism in the past is that they as a group, a racial group have out-competed other racial groups for resources and mating partners, and the main reason that Macdonald proposes for this is that the Jewish racial biological group has practiced a type of racial intelligence eugenics, so they have evolved over time to be more intelligent than other groups. And that groups of Gentiles have reacted like any other group of animals would when they are confronted with a superior group of animals who are more likely to out-compete them for limited resources that are available. Macdonald sees this anti-Semitism as a perfectly natural instinctive result of one group losing out to another, his view of the German National Socialists was that they just tried to do the same thing as the Jews were doing! A “mirror image” of Judaism! Indeed Macdonald actually endorses this type of Darwinian competition and views it as inevitable. Now of course being a Zionist correct professor from the Zionist halls of Academic Americana, Macdonald makes sure that he does not deny the holocaust, and suggests that it did occur and happened merely and as the end result of an impersonal biological chain reaction. I suppose that Kevin Macdonald has no problem with being deceitful about this, because he sees deceptive behaviour as being purely advantageous in the competition for the ‘survival of the fittest’ game, just like competitors on the American ‘Televitz’ game show ‘Survivor’, lying and being deceitful is all “part of the game”! So Macdonald has no problem with lying, he is willing to claim that the Holocaust actually happened, when in reality it never took place, for the same reason as the Jews; lying and cheating and deceiving is all part of the great evolutionary game of life or so they think. And he goes on further in his theorizing to suggest that perhaps seeing that the Jews have been in his eyes ‘successful’ then perhaps his own group of Gentiles should do the same, becoming more like the Jews and learn from their tried and tested environmental strategies.

So it is apparent that Kevin Macdonald, even amongst the obligatory accusations of ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘neo-nazi’, is actually, at least in his eyes, seeing the Jews in a favourable light, their success should be emulated, its perfected naturally, desirable in fact now, he extends this to the hawkish Zionist Jews, the extreme right so to speak of Judaism;

“But the bottom line is that the Zionists were successful. Israel would not have become a state without a great many deeply ethnocentric Jews willing to engage in any means necessary to bring about their dream: a state that would be a vehicle for their ethnic interests. It would not have come about without the most radical among them people like Jabotinsky, Begin, Shamir, Sharon, and their supporters – a group that now includes the entire organized American Jewish community. The impending dispossession of Europeans will only be avoided if people of their ilk can be found among the political class of Europeans.” – Kevin Macdonald ‘Understanding Jewish Influence II’

Well Macdonald has already answered my title question, he is not a mild dove reformer of Judaism but a cynical Zionist in the order of a Jabotinsky or a Ariel Sharon, to the “Which Way Western Man?” question Macdonald would answer ‘to Zion by any means necessary’! The end justifies the means, any act of depravity and criminal savagery or deceit is good as long you are acting in the interests of your ethnicity, as long as your ‘ethnocentric’, that is the most important evolutionary trait for worldly success! Macdonald thinks that this is perhaps the best way, after all it worked for the Jews….But no, that is not success! Firstly I do not consider the Jews a ‘success’, no true Aryan would consider the Jews a success, but only as a terrible failure, a ghastly unmitigated disaster, like a cluster bomb going off in a fine china shop! With the folly of the Gentiles only adding more fuel to the explosion.

Kevin Macdonald concludes that the Jews, because of their ‘history’, which he believes is written in the OT scriptures, is primarily concerned with an ideology stressing racial purity that the Jews on their sojourns, after the Diaspora, ruthlessly maintained their superior genetic traits through strict reproductive controls that ensured they kept their competitive edge amongst their Gentile host population, this practiced eugenics ensured their genetics remained segregated and untainted!
“From an evolutionary perspective, the purpose of this ideology is to ensure the continuity of the kinship group, even within the diaspora context in which there are enormous pressures for assimilation and gradual loss of contact with other group members. The results have been extraordinarily effective: as indicated in Chapter 2, Jews have maintained a significant genetic distance between themselves and their host societies for centuries. Indeed they are the only group that has successfully maintained genetic and cultural segregation while living in the midst of other peoples over an extremely long period of time. Johnson calls them “the most tenacious people in history.” – Kevin Macdonald. ’A people that shall dwell alone’

This is just false, no basis in reality whatsoever! We can measure Macdonald’s theorizing against real history, for an example I will use the historical data of Jews in Denmark which we can compare against Macdonald’s false theorizing. I use Denmark as a microcosm, it serves us well because it is small and the Jewish history within Denmark is concise and easily accessible.

Christian IV (reigned 1588-1648) was the first Danish king to establish connections with Jews. King Christian IV appointed Albert Dionis to the post of mintmaster at Gluckstadt on the Elbe in 1619. Dionis was a Sephardic Jew originally from Portugal who had settled in Hamburg and established an import-export business which had links to Denmark. Thus Dionis became the first Jew to be issued a royal Danish letter of protection as he accepted the employment position in Denmark.
Firstly this Jew was offered a position of employment by the Danish King and thus he received a passport that allowed him into the Kingdom of Denmark. No Jew was allowed to step foot inside Denmark without the King’s permission. Now Macdonald cannot explain this as one biological evolutionary group aggressively outcompeting another for finite resources, resulting in the genetically superior Jewish racial group overwhelming the Danes with sheer intellectual and genetic mastery! NO, that is ridiculous, the reality is one lone businessman who was known to be Jew from Portugal was recruited by the King of Denmark to work for him, Dionis was offered a position of employment, and being a position more profitable than his present situation he accepted. Otherwise he simply would never been able to step foot inside Denmark.

After consulting with Dionis in 1622. King Christian IV invited “Portuguese” Jews from Amsterdam and Hamburg to settle in Gluckstadt in the hope that this newly established town would equal the business acumen of Hamburg. To attract business away from Hamburg the King offered considerable incentives – including start-up capital, trading privileges, low taxes, freedom of religion. These incentives attractive as they were did indeed entice many traders and business men to Gluckstadt to set up and establish shop, trade and various industry, amongst the new arrivals were Jews.

Again the only reason that any more Jews were allowed in Denmark is because The Danes invited them along with other traders and business people, an invitation with attractive incentives and protective travel arrangements is hardly an aggressive premeditated Darwinian takeover of one group over another! No the only reason Jews arrived in Denmark was that they were made an attractive offer to go there, a better situation than what they already had, it was the Danish King’s design, his foresight, his idea, and his city which he and the Danes built that some fortunate Jews moved into.

In return the Danish King for all he offered expected that these traders and business people furnish the Royal Court and the rest of Denmark with quality goods. Later some “German” (Ashkenazi) Jews traded in Denmark, but they had to be able to provide a letter of safe-conduct, since the right to trade and live in Denmark only applied to “portuguese” Jews. This eventually changed and German Jews were allowed to travel and trade in Denmark freely. This was only after they had proven that they could be enterprising merchants with disposable capital. This is the historical account of the first Jews in Denmark…

I think I have made my point, but I will add this; The Danish Decree of 1814 had in effect given equal rights to Jews along with the rest of the population, which meant that Jews could play a larger role in public life. A great many social relationships developed between Christian and Jewish families and, when these resulted in marriage, the Jewish partner was usually baptized. In this way the leading Jewish families became Christian because the wealthiest Jewish families actively sought to attract Danish Christians as marriage partners for their sons and daughters, and willingly gave up their Jewish religion to achieve this social goal. This often created division in the Jewish community of Denmark who felt betrayed as their leading families rejected them to become Christians. On the other hand the willing defection and the admiration of the Jews towards their Danish hosts won for them greater Christian favour and understanding, this understanding on the part of the Danes allowed converted Jews to still feel proud of the Jewish heritage and they were encouraged to be proud of who they were. and this settled tensions in the rest of the Jewish community.

Right, so the reality here is very different to that theorized by the professor of psychology for the University of California; Kevin Macdonald. Kevin Macdonald seems to understand very little of history, the example I have given could be applied over and over again and extended to many, many different nations and kingdoms throughout history.

All Kevin Macdonald wants to achieve is some plausible justification for racist Zionist behaviour and any racist behaviour for that matter, so he falsifies history and uses spurious science to achieve this, he is a Cynical Zionist from a Zionist Correct American Academic Institution. Kevin Macdonald serves nobody’s interest except himself and other hawkish racist, deluded, irrational Zionists. His extreme views and biased theories may have found some audience with Jewish Zionist racists and White Nationalist Gentiles (BS Gentiles), which Macdonald calls ‘ethnocentric’, but the last thing our movement wants is more cynical Zionist hawks and their Boromir Syndrome Gentile hangers-on.

Sieg Heil!

Posted by Miecz Elizejski.

The Zionist machine’s most active set of gears would have to be the one that spouts information. It is active everyday all day all the time. The information that this massive contraption produces is its own special brand of information we call “Zioninst Correctness” (ZC) and it completely engulfs the more known type of information known as “Political Correctness” (PC), which is meant to be spread by servile Gentiles. The corporate-owned news networks, cable channels, popular newspapers, and major entertainment producers are all subject to ZC. Entertainment most often manages to break PC for the simple reason of it being the easiest to excuse (“it’s just a movie”), but despite this, even most hard edge and darkly humored satire (eg. Fight Club) is still bound by the shackles of ZC.

The “correctness” in ZC is only “correct” in that it is subservient to the Zionist agenda and in agreement with their view of history. Political Correctness is just about not offending anyone. However, the truth behind the curtain is: not offending anyone whom ZC doesn’t want to offend. That is the hidden string.

Upon examining war films from the late 40s to the late 60s we can see whom the ZC puppeteers were ok with offending. Aside from rare, semi-honest portrayals, the soldiers of the Wehrmacht were mindless killing machines that were deservedly gunned down by heroic Americans. This increased dramatically with the birth of the action film genre that was basically an offshoot from war films. In order to make things just a bit more exciting, the filmmakers took creative license and effectively departed from reality. This was the start of all the action film cliches we know so well: guns that don’t run empty, badguys who can’t aim, exaggerated explosions and physics, and so on.

After the Germans become too much of a retread, it was by the 1970s that some new groups started to also appear as “the bad guys.” These included Soviet and Vietnamese Communists as well as Arab Terrorists. The first two groups were just convenient propaganda for the American side of the Cold War. Notice that after the Cold War ended, so did the action films exploiting it for the most part. However, the portrayal of Arabs was part of a scheme already in place long before, but now there was fresh wood for the fire, so to speak.

The following documentary goes into detail about the portrayal of Arabs and Muslims in US cinema. It was first a book by the narrator, Dr. Jack Shaheen, before being made into this short documentary film that was only released online as far as I know. Note the section on the production company called Cannon starting at the 23 min mark and the part on the film Rules of Engagement.

DOCUMENTARY: REEL BAD ARABS

The documentary makes many good points, even some against Zionist crime, but seeing that it was so far from the mainstream and does its little mandatory share of comparing National Socialists to evil, it was most definitely under the reins of ZC. But still, only truly intuitive viewers managed to find it and see it when it first came out, while most just ate up the daily cable news bulletins.

This brings me to the main point here, the ZC weapons of Vilification and Demonization. These are essentially increments along the ZC-hate-meter. Vilification is the first stage; it is achieved by repeated negative and/or antagonistic portrayals of a group. Once the association of a group with villainy becomes automatic and second nature from an audience, the conditioning has worked. Demonization works the same way, but the demonized subject is only shown as an antagonist (villains may be shown as protagnist anti-heroes such as MacBeth or Scarface) and they are almost always responsible for premeditating some awful crime that their villainous henchmen go on and carry out.

Can the reader guess to whom I might be referring?

Of course… who else, but Adolf Hitler. The man has repeatedly been portrayed in a way best summed up as “the incarnation of absolute evil” - a phrase that appeared in this TIME magazine article by Elie Wiesel. A very similar phrase describing Hitler was used in the game Wolfenstein 3D where the player destroys a very cartoon looking version of Hitler at the end of Episode 3. More on this highly influential game coming up in a later post. The first time Hitler was shown in a German film played by an actual actor (as opposed to stock footage or implied prescence) was in the 2004 film Der Untergang. However, even this dramatic and very detailed reenactment of Hitler’s last days succumbs to common myth and ZC: the Soviet war crimes in Berlin were ignored and the “six million figure” is reiterated at the end despite not having anything to do with the film’s story. Interestingly, the only numbers given at the end are 50 million (as “total dead during WW2″) and 6 million (as “exterminated Jews”), yet the other groups who suffered don’t seem to be worth mentioning. Seeing that the film is about Germany’s defeat from the German point of view, why not mention how many Germans died? Because that would be a “heresy.” Demonization carries the “heresy virus.” Meaning, any positive notion that someone gives about a “demon” makes them a “heretic” and a more-than-likely victim of character assassination, or as they used to do in the medieval times, burning the stake, or as the story of Christ goes, public crucifixion. In fact, “public crucifixion” is a phrase sometimes used to mean “character assassination.”

Now, why do the Jews unleash the ZC Hounds whenever their worldview is perceived by them to be threatened? Simply because “the myth of persecution is the adhesive and cement of Judaism” as the narrator states in the documentary Who Brought the Slaves to America?

Here are slight elaborations from two famous minds:

“In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.” ~Adolf Hitler

“While all other religions endeavor to explain to the people by symbols the metaphysical significance of life, the religion of the Jews is entirely immanent and furnishes nothing but a mere war-cry in the struggle with other nations.” ~Arthur Schopenhauer

The Jewish mind is completely empirical and that is why they fabricate demons in this world from the likeness of their opponents and sanctify their fallen kin and make demi-gods of their martyrs before arrogantly projecting these delusions unto all. Like all inhabitants of this Earth, they also have this need for the metaphysical, but cannot (or choose not to) break out from their Talmudic prison; like a pitiful child too afraid or too stubborn to be independent in the world beyond home. Gentiles are their prisoners, their herd, either bought out or successfully connived into being goys.

We Aryans know that the human mind cannot live healthily as such and thus we explore the Greater and the Metaphysical with eagerness, but without forcing our subjective viewpoints onto others.

“Belief is a matter for each one to resolve in the light of his own conscience.” ~Rudolf Hess