… but you can’t stop him from pissing in it. That was my first reaction to reading the lengthy discussion that has arisen in the comments section of the previous post. Delendaestziobot, thank you for your contributions. The main site is far from complete, and there are further pages to be added that will address more topics, but perhaps it is worth clarifying our positions here.
Response to questions:
What’s the difference between your “Aryanism” and communist-hippies?
1) Communism believes that people can and should be moulded to conform through behavioural coercion. We believe that coercion is oppressive, and oppose a society permanently composed of people forced to behave differently than is spontaneous for them. Thus we support state-controlled reproduction.
2) Communism is entirely materialistic, hence opposes religion. We view material means only as a tool for spiritual ends, hence support religion.
3) Communism promotes humanism. We promote universalism.
4) Hippies promote hedonism. We promote asceticism.
5) Hippies despise all violence. We despise only initiatory violence.
ZC meaning what
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/new-vocabulary-zionist-correctness/
Response to claims:
1. Nations as they exist today, for the most part, at least in the host people, are cultural, traditionally and biologically similar.
Biologically, blood type, anthropometric and haplogroup studies show much genetic diversity within any nation. This leads to similarly great divergence in character despite common tradition, hence the creation of subcultures (e.g. religions). The people who created these subcultures find themselves having most in common with people from different nations who created similar subcultures. We encourage those who belong to noble subcultures to unite as a folk (which may well turn out to be the best way to gather Aryan genetics).
2. Open borders and destruction of separate sovereign nations destroys culture, tradition, blood and is sin against natures design.
Only by abandoning the paradigm of ethnicity-based racial identity can we pursue trait-based racial idealism. Only the latter can lead to a better society than those observed in history, including a society capable of resisting Jewish and Judaic corruption (a feat in which none so far have succeeded). We do not support “open borders”; we support closing the borders after they have been redrawn according to parameters which actually matter (e.g. nobility).
3. In the protocols, and many other places the Jews have shown the agenda of promoting internationalism and one world rule.
Which is planned to be preceded by civil and international wars. Our countermeasure is to promote unity, thereby hopefully averting such wars and replacing it with a joint uprising against Zionism.
4. Hitler was a Nationalist; in the sense of he wouldn’t allow Jews, Africans, Arabs, Slavs, Asians, southern European, Eastern European to reside in Germany and breed with German women.
Hitler was a National Socialist ie. a folkist. The Nuremberg Laws affected only Jews, and the only other segregated group was the Gypsies. The common factor between Jews and Gypsies is their tribalist tradition which excluded them from folk eligibility. Find the old OWNP/Voice of Venom audio interviews featuring Emma Peters for refutations to claims of discrimination towards other groups.
And may I remind our fellow anti-Zionists not to waste too much time debating people who obviously have no intention of joining us. Consider the possibility that they are trying to waste our time on purpose. Only debate them if you believe the audience might benefit from observing the debate more than from receiving whatever other counterpropaganda you might be producing in the same amount of time. Time is short. Use yours optimally.
Entries (RSS)
Thankyou ‘Aryan Sanctuary’ for the clarification on these points, makes sense to me.
When uniform idealism based on racial traits spontaneously arise in nations which are seperate from each other, they must have a common ground of truth i.e. Aryanism.
Later these idealistic traits form institutions recognized as universal to all Aryans, vernacular expressions become invaluable witnesses to the arising of universal institutions that provide the ground for Natural Law which transends traditional divides whether language or geography or custom or genetics, etc.
ZC, Zionist Correctness is what I have called in the past ‘Kosher Konservativism’, which in the West includes promotion of Judeo-Christianity, status-quo economics (Jewish controlled banking), parochial tribalism (Nationalism), materialism (Consumerism) and specialization, Capitalsim (misnomer; devotion to Jewish usuary) At the same time the schism of ‘individual enterprise’ and the myth of the ‘self made man’ is held as the only means of creativity and energy within a Zionist Correct society, which serves to further fracture and mislead and divide the society.
The ‘Left’ shares similar values as the ‘Right’ with a few pre-planned theatrichal differences, their conclusion being their eventual synthesis with Zionism, which controlls both sides as per Hegallian Dialectics.
Is the American Pacific Northwest the most viable land to establish borders based on nobility?
Does anyone have the Emma Peters interview? I would be interested to hear what she’s got to say. Oh and Delendaestziobot, good break down of Capatalism, couldn’t agree more.
Yes, America’s so called Capitalism is a carefully manufactured myth focused on the heroic ‘entrepreneur’, a myth not unlike the the heroic ‘proletariat’ created by Moses Levy Mordecai (Karl Marx). The heroic entrepreneur character created by Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) another wealthy non-productive Jew, who immigrated from Communist Russia to America to work as a Hollywood screen writer, later she was paid to write romantic novels about immoral low-lifes who are supposed to somehow represent daring, individualistic, bold, industrial ‘Capitalists’, like a 20th Century version of the mythological Hollywood, lone gun-slinger cowboy.
All the complete fairy tale throwaway fiction that Jews have written about ‘Communism’ and ‘Capitalism’ is not because they are good myth makers, or can write entertaining fiction its because they have failed to understand reality and they have been funded above others by their Central Bank to write and speak endlessly about things they do not understand, so that anyone unfortunate enough to read or listen to the endless garbage will not understand either.
It’s really quite simple, the labels ‘Communism’ and ‘Capitalism’ are literary devices used to make Jewish contolled Centralized Banking look attactive and desireable, but when one sees the reality of this, its like looking at a fat old pig wearing lipstick and a wig.
Centralized Banking is described like this;
“The bank hath the benefit on the interest on all monies which it creates out of nothing” - Bank of England Charter 1694.
Logic renders this statement as absurd, its ridiculous, clearly fails the first law of thermodynamics and evrything else. What it really says is;
‘We individuals who are collectively known as ‘Bank of England’ print digits on rectangular pieces of paper, we alone have this right, which we have bestowed upon ourselves and no one else, we decree that everybody else must only use our printed pieces of rectangular paper notes if they wish to buy or sell or trade anything in the entire world. Whatever amount of printed paper notes we alone produce everybody else must first borrow from us before they can use them as well, the notes always remain out property, and everybody else must return all of them to us ‘Bank of England’, at such a time as we decree, when the pieces of printed rectangular paper are returned to us, there must also be more of them than we originally loaned out, seeming that this is an impossibility under our first decree, which is only we can produce the printed rectangular paper notes, therefore everybody else shall be in debt to us, who are collectively known as ‘Bank of England’.