How often do we read or hear the Jewish media telling us that we are a “tolerant” multiethnic society? And how often do we see the stupid, arrogant Gentile who thinks he has broken through Zionist brainwashing by turning to tribalism? The more I watch the situation unfold, the more I agree that Gentiles really are as idiotic as described in the Talmud.
What does the word “tolerance” really mean? It means putting up with something you dislike. Therefore, when the Jewish media declares - over and over again - that we are “tolerant”, what are they really programming within you? Are they programming you to respect other groups? No! They are programming you to hate other groups, and then reminding you how much you have put up with from other groups. Tolerance presumes disgust, or else there would be nothing requiring toleration. The Jewish media is saying: “You know and we know that everything wrong with society is caused by those anti-Semitic, anti-Western Third World immigrants, but let’s ignore this.” They are telling you to ignore an illusion that they themselves planted in your head!
If I tell you to ignore (Zionist) Jared Taylor’s annoying accent, I have already suggested to you that Jared Taylor’s accent is annoying, and you will now notice it more than before you read this sentence. Similarly, if the Jewish media says we are a tolerant multiethnic society, they have already suggested to you that multiethnic society is highly uncomfortable, and subsequent negative encounters with other groups will now be amplified in your mind while negative encounters with your own group will be minimalized, leading to a subconsciously biased perspective. The true brainwashing lies not in the statements of the media, but inside the words they use.
It is common knowledge that all tolerance is temporary. Therefore when the Jewish media promotes tolerance, they are doing nothing more than setting up a backlash whose eventual emergence was part of their plan all along. Therefore the Gentile who gives up suppressing his hatred is playing right along the Zionist script. I have said this many times before: they want non-Jewish groups to fight each other, the more the better, because every group then becomes their weapon against every other group.
“A UNIVERSAL ECONOMIC CRISIS WHEREBY WE SHALL THROW UPON THE STREETS WHOLE MOBS OF WORKERS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN ALL THE COUNTRIES OF EUROPE. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles … “OURS” THEY WILL NOT TOUCH, BECAUSE THE MOMENT OF ATTACK WILL BE KNOWN TO US AND WE SHALL TAKE MEASURES TO PROTECT OUR OWN.” - Protocols of Zion
Do Aryanists promote tolerance? No, we do not. We promote unity: genuine honour, genuine empathy, genuine fellowship across the lines of ethnicity and religion against the common enemy. Compagnons-at-arms do not tolerate each other, they are positively honoured by each other’s presence on the same side of the battlefield, regardless of origins. This is what we must aim for.
“Final solution can be effected only by means of a warm-hearted resolve on the part of those who once faced each other as opponents, but whose mutual esteem, based on a recognition of each other’s bravery, could become a bridge leading to the future - a future which must never see any repetition of past sufferings.” - Adolf Hitler
I’m confused. It seems that you define ‘Aryanism’ as a multicultural and multi-ethnic spirit of nobility. In essence, Aryanism transcends all race. That means there are Chinese Aryans, African Aryans, Arab Aryans, etc That’s stretching things a bit far. Of course there are many criminal and low whites, and of course there are ‘noble’ Africans, Asians etc. And of course we should cooperate with the best of all races to advance a better world. But that doesn’t mean that race is not one of the primary identifications of Aryanism. Aryanism is the European folk spirit at its best.
@wolfgang: I see more of a Aryan spirit in the Middle-East and in the Far East at this period of time than I see in the West. The European folk spirit needs a resurrection, since as of today that spirit has degenerated into a slave-mentality; the people have become the willing sheeple of their masters and their lies.
Race is a primary identification of Aryanism, of course, but you’re wrong in the way that you identify race. The Aryan race has no skin colour, only its’ Noble spirit. The seeds of Nobility are planted a little here and a little there, and to say that the Europeans have gathered most of the seeds might be true, but we’re also the ones who’ve squandered those gifts the most by trading it all away for a Ikea lifestyle in serfdom.
There is the race of the flesh and race of the spirit. In the ideal case these are categories are identical. Noble or Aryan values such as courage, loyalty and compassion are spiritual in nature and universal and independent of culture - unless the given culture is ignoble in it self like in the case of Jewish and “Western” materialist.
Few days ago I drove in an overcrowded bus and thought about how overpopulated our cities have become and how unpleasant and stressful our lives have become. Than the two blacks entered the bus and one of them was wearing dreadlocks. Since there are no many blacks where I was shocked at first, but than I started to recollect my previous thoughts about overpopulation and started to suspect that alien elements might be a good circumstance. Anything that can obstruct the democratic-capitalist system which supports our present state of slavery may be useful…perhaps even a virus.
@Longinus
Europe and the west is heavily overpopulated, and due to our “foreign aid” and our “gracious lending”, this trend(along with other degenerate traits) has spread to most parts of the world.
Overpopulation, and the destructive impact it has on the environment, is one of the most serious symptons of rampant degeneracy that is plaguing the world. I doubt it can be overcome simply by reform. Who, in this day and age where everyone is obsessing over their illusory rights, wants to give up the so called “right to have children”.
What they are doing in China is at best a beginning.
Hmm… Don’t know if my comments are appearing or not?
I wrote a couple of times… Did those comments get lost?
@Isaac
I’m not sure why, but this is happening a lot more often recently. I’ve had problems too. I’m looking through the blog settings to see if there’s anything preventing messages from getting through (and there was nothing in spam). Sorry about that.
—-
@Ostmann
If you’re around, please check your email. There might be some problems.
Mostly just found this article interesting, as it gave a bit more understanding to what AS was saying about the false left’s use of “tolerance,” and how we need to come against that. Wrote an article on my site, “Tolerance is NOT a Virtue,” based on what was written above. Thought maybe this title could even become a slogan?
https://austnatrevolution.wordpress.com/tolerance-is-not-a-virtue/
@Isaac
Many False Leftists, when asked to explain the benefits of their country becoming more multiethnic, are unable to give a coherent response, and just vaguely mention something about restaurants. This is pathetic. The fact that False Left leaders didn’t even bother to supply their own followers with a better answer is evidence of what I have been pointing out all along: THE FALSE LEFT WAS DELIBERATELY DESIGNED TO LOSE TO THE FAR-RIGHT, IN ORDER FOR THE BACKLASH SCENE IN THE ZIONIST SCRIPT TO PLAY OUT EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE.
So it’s now down to us, whose mission is to stop the backlash and thereby leave the Zionist script, to supply intuitive leftists with a strong True Left response to this question that rightists are going to be asking us more and more, a response that will make rightists appear stupid for even asking the question.
“Thought maybe this title could even become a slogan?”
Simply stating “Tolerance is NOT a Virtue” without explanation could lead most new readers to mistakenly confuse us with the far-right. For a slogan, we need at least some reference to what attitude we support instead of tolerance e.g. “_____, Not Tolerance”.
Also, probably no one else except Aryanists will notice this, but actually we don’t promote “virtue” either:
http://aryanism.net/philosophy/original-nobility/
Something like “Tolerance is NOT Admirable” would have been a better title.
Thanks for the clarity on virtue. I will work on altering my post. I can imagine there are many things that like that need to get sharpened up on my site. I am still pretty fresh to this, but hope to have the right heart at least.