http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-roundup

Thank you again to everyone who contributed to this project. I honestly believe that if we hadn’t taken the trouble to tackle the topic of Aryan racial theory from scratch, nobody else would have. Those who were around longer than us certainly never bothered, but instead were content to repeat and add bombastic decoration to fundamentally unworkable notions that neither accounted for elementary archaeological discoveries nor even possessed internal consistency, and most importantly, proposed no evolutionary model for the development of Aryan traits. How did Aryans evolve to be noble while everyone else did not? That’s the question nobody cared about answering prior to us. Then again, nobody other than us even bothered to provide an exact definition of nobility, so what should we expect?

As I have been saying a lot, and more often the longer I’ve hung around in this scene, being non-PC is no indication of intelligence. The main reason PC is in rapid decline is not because people are rapidly becoming more intelligent, but merely because people are rapidly finding certain non-PC narratives more flattering to themselves. The biggest mistake a newcomer to the Jew-aware blogosphere can make is to assume they have found a community with a higher level of intelligence. Nothing could be further from the truth. The present-day Jew-aware blogosphere is, for the most part, nothing but a place where crude minds that enjoy being flattered gather to flatter one another about being more intelligent and “awakened” than everyone else. (As I have been saying almost as much, the communities where the truly intelligent discussions take place are the sci-fi/fantasy communities. I’ll say it again: a single randomly chosen apolitical Dungeons & Dragons fan probably has more to offer intellectually than every far-right so-called ‘philosopher’ (LOL) in the world put together.) So, if you are a newly Jew-aware person who happened to have surfed by here, please heed this warning. You are, for the most part, not among intellectuals. Most Jew-aware people today are utter buffoons through and through, but who furthermore lack the ability to perceive their own buffonery because they think their Jew-awareness automatically makes them geniuses. That’s where the term “useful idiot” comes from. And no, it wasn’t always like this. In the first few years following 9/11, the Jew-aware blogosphere really was intelligent (or at least somewhat sensible), and even idealistic to an extent. But it had degraded to its current condition ever since the far-right demographically inundated it.

And so the story of the post-9/11 anti-Zionism in some way parallels the story of Aryan diffusion. We shared our findings with barbarians who took the results of our work without also adopting our attitudes, and soon enough the entire scene became an unrecognizable mess in which we have been pushed to the fringes and the spirit of the movement has been turned around 180 degrees, from the heroic rally, “Jews are a tribe, therefore they must be destroyed!” to the despicable call, ”We must form our own tribes!”

But for this very reason I hope that, by telling the story of Aryan diffusion, we lay the foundations for also restoring anti-Zionism to what it originally promised to be. Only henceforth, we will have to be in opposition to all tribes, Gentile as well as Jewish.

By the way, just because we have a quality-based racial perspective does not mean our critics are going to stop harassing us using ethnicity-based issues. We need to know how - and how not - to decisively counter their arguments, beyond merely dismissing them as products of tunnel vision (even though they are!). Unlike the False Left, whose entire rhetorical arsenal consists of making lame and unconvincing excuses for so-called “underachieving” ethnic groups (thereby implicitly acknowledging not only the ethnic categories but also the Western standard of “achievement”), the True Left must directly attack the Western standard of “achievement” (thereby automatically discrediting all accusations of “underachievement” based on such a standard). Moreover, we must offer our own alternative standard of “achievement”, obviously based on our nobility-centred values.

Our work continues. If you want to help us, contact us:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

11 Responses to “It’s a wrap!”
  1. Akhnat0n says:

    I’m thrilled with this wrap up. Aside from a technical point of view, (because I would rather read a less finished version now to see technical improvements added in the future, than to have to wait even longer for parts to the series) the quality of thought put into this writing is outstanding. It is incredibly inspirational and I envy not being part of the team that put it all together.

  2. Anthony says:

    AS - Congratulations on this excellent series.

  3. A great end to a great series.

    “Neo-Nazi useful idiots and Zionist historians alike who claim that Hitler was a Eurocentrist have no answer as to why, given no shortage of exclusively European symbols that he could have easily chosen for his flag, Hitler instead chose the swastika, a symbol famous for being found all over the globe.”

    Brilliantly put.

    Will this series be put on PDF?

  4. LuciferOverZion says:

    Nice job!

    I would like to see a page with all the phenotypes of the different Aryan and Gentile types compared. :)

  5. AS says:

    @Anthony

    Thanks for your help with it.

    @Miecz

    “Will this series be put on PDF?”

    Not for now. None of the pages are final versions; we are still waiting for additional pictures (*coughJJcough*) and other material to add to the various pages.

    @LOZ

    “I would like to see a page with all the phenotypes of the different Aryan and Gentile types compared.”

    This is one of the things we discussed potentially adding later (*coughJJcough*).

  6. Abu Haydar says:

    I learned some stuff from the series. From the part where you talked about neolithic presence in southeast Asia, my economics teacher confirmed neolithics were here by telling me an obvious fact.

  7. Decebal says:

    Great job AS!

    On the page you said:
    “The term “Nordic” in physical anthropology is a misnomer, as the physical traits popularly associated with the Trojan “Nordic” type such as long limbs, slender torso, etc. are traits adaptive to Troy a.k.a. Asgard warm climate (absent from the latitudes of the far north) by maximizing the body’s surface-area-to-volume ratio.”
    This corresponds with genetic evidence of the similarity of the early Neolithic farmers in Scandinavia and modern Mediterranean (presumably Eastern) populations: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/224856039_Origins_and_genetic_legacy_of_Neolithic_farmers_and_hunter-gatherers_in_Europe. That modern Mediterranean population are more similar to Neolithic farmers in Scandinavia does not mean that the former are necessarily more Aryan. Unless Aryans in the East Mediterranean first sprang out of the ground or fell from the sky, they would have been related to surrounding non-Aryan populations (after all, Cronus is a son of Uranus) or/and that the populations arriving in Scandinavia would have already been mixed.

    You also said: “The common literary motif of sky and earth as a pair - man existing between the two - derives from the steppe panorama of Turanian blood memory. A rival literary motif, and the correct pairing according to Aryan blood memory, is sky and ocean as a pair, respectively the source and sink of the water cycle linked by rivers and driven by sunlight.”
    Can you point me to some examples for both?

    For those who are a bit busy and cannot read the whole series at the moment, Miecz has made a condensed version. Hope you enjoy! https://swordofelysium.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/humor-nazis-8/

  8. John Johnson says:

    “That modern Mediterranean population are more similar to Neolithic farmers in Scandinavia does not mean that the former are necessarily more Aryan.”

    A lot [all?] of the modern research on this uses genetic markers. The Neolithic farmers had more time to leave a genetic impact in the Mediterranean, and when they reached Scandinavia there was already a large Paleolithic population. Scandinavia has a significant Paleolithic element to this day, and my guess is that the researchers look at the modern population as a whole, and this large Paleolithic element (which is not as mixed as modern Paleolithic Mediterranean groups would likely be) brings the average down.

    Pre-1945 anthropologists used bones and physical attributes to compare populations, so they were able to quite easily distinguish between Scandinavians with predominately Paleolithic or Neolithic heritage. They found that Scandinavians of predominately Neolithic heritage were essentially the exact same, skeletally, as Mediterraneans of predominately Neolithic heritage.

    Also, I don’t think you’re disputing this, but I’d like to say that what AS says about surface-area-to-volume ratio is correct.

    “Unless Aryans in the East Mediterranean first sprang out of the ground or fell from the sky, they would have been related to surrounding non-Aryan populations.”

    Good point.

    -

    If I may make a suggestion for the page: I suggest that you write out ‘Proto-Indo-European’ a few times before using the abbreviation PIE.

    By the way, ‘popular science’ has recently begun taking interest in the Paleolithic/Neolithic/Turanian view that we present:
    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29213892

    I finally have a bunch of free time over the coming month, so I will do my best to find images and additional material.

  9. Decebal says:

    @JJ,

    “A lot [all?] of the modern research on this uses genetic markers. The Neolithic farmers had more time to leave a genetic impact in the Mediterranean, and when they reached Scandinavia there was already a large Paleolithic population. Scandinavia has a significant Paleolithic element to this day, and my guess is that the researchers look at the modern population as a whole, and this large Paleolithic element (which is not as mixed as modern Paleolithic Mediterranean groups would likely be) brings the average down.”

    That makes sense. Do you think that there are isolated pockets in Scandinavia with strong Neolithic influences?

    “Also, I don’t think you’re disputing this, but I’d like to say that what AS says about surface-area-to-volume ratio is correct.”

    You’re right. I was backing it up.

  10. AS says:

    @Decebal

    “Can you point me to some examples for both?”

    You yourself mentioned Uranus, who is usually paired with Gaia, as per the Turanian outlook.

    However, Uranus can also be paired with Neptune, which should feel more intuitively comfortable to us:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D5y5llQq9I

  11. John Johnson says:

    To be honest, it’s not like they are isolated anymore today since most people live in cities and move around quite frequently. From what I understand, they are indeed a ‘pocket’ in Norway, but in Sweden the Neolithic element is larger, and may even be predominate.

  12.  
Leave a Reply