You can almost see the engorged Gentile penis in front of his mouth as he speaks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG77qpLi4oc
Who is Paul Weston?
Oh, of course. We could never have guessed it, right?
Actually, we predicted it:
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/get-your-soapboxes/
Weston claims to identify with ordinary people, but compare Weston’s speech with this video by an actual ordinary young guy from London:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzO6AFVKU74
Who is the warmonger here? Who is appealing to base emotions, and who is appealing to higher emotions? Whoever tries to scare his audience into supporting him is always the bad guy. Always. Because whenever people are driven to act out of fear for their own safety they automatically switch off their empathy for others. Anyone who encourages fear is killing empathy, and anyone who kills empathy is sabotaging the only equipment we have for sincere communication.
I feel compelled to repost this quote from the Platforming page:
“He was not at all like the representatives of other parties. Where the latter appealed to the interests of their listeners, who all belonged to a certain definite group, by promising to press their interests before all others, Hitler invariably spoke for the absent ones. In other words, before an audience of Red workers he spoke about the need for a healthy farmers’ class, or he defended the German officers. Facing officers he criticised the attitude of the intelligentsia which had ignored the workingman and left him to his fate. The time for self-criticism had come, he would say, and the way from man to man had to be found despite all obstacles.” - Alfred Rosenberg
http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/platforming/
When a politician appears who is willing to encourage Christians to understand the concerns of Muslims, and Muslims to understand the concerns of Christians, and the same for all non-Jewish denominations, that is the one whom we should support and follow.
If you would like to become such a politician yourself, we can also help you. Contact us:
As usual the ‘nationalists’ and ‘patriots’ of the united kingdom cower before their handlers. The EDL are at least unashamedly pro-Jew, the BNP are a spent force and these buffoons are equally as lost.
A walking contradiction - a Zionist standing up for Englanders on the grounds of anti-immigration and anti-multiculturalism!
While I support immigration via attracting noble persons through noble policies, I sympathize with the present plight of many Westerners who feel alienated and fearful in their own country thanks to the Marxist policies in place, which are fomenting racism and creating divide just as ZC intended.
It’s my birth day by the way. Cheers comrades! This weekend I plan to hunt for an affordable laptop and get back into gear on the project a few of you know about. Stay tuned for updates.
“It’s my birth day by the way.”
Happy birthday!
Aryan Aim, happy birthday!
Happy birthday AA
I hate having to be in school, far away from my home country. I wish to return to my homeland one day, and I know school will make that possible, but I have to bite my tongue on a daily basis to do this. I’ve seen a rise in Islamophobia in my school - not that it didn’t exist before, but now it’s becoming more emphatic - and I can’t really even fight against it. It’s not even that my ideology - our ideology - is at odds with 99% of humans, but I can’t even point the finger at the enemy without hijacking future plans (all related to the movement).
Anybody else in a similar situation?
“I’ve seen a rise in Islamophobia in my school”
Can you elaborate? It should be possible to argue against it even if you cannot name the Jew. The main thing is to engage people’s empathy as often as possible: “How would you like it if…?” If people can be made to imagine themselves in the position of the scapegoat, then there might still be hope.
People who are school-age right now are the most susceptible to ZC propaganda, as they have little to no memory of how things were before 9/11 when people used to get along just fine. Back in the late 90s, the notion of Islamophobia would have been unthinkable, but teenagers today barely got to experience that. All their experience is of the post-9/11, post-Iraq/Afghanistan/etc. invasions atmosphere. We can DESCRIBE the earlier times, but it is likely that they would prefer to trust their own experiences, and thus believe narratives which reinforce their own experiences. This is the Jewish cunning, timing it so that by the time we have exposed their lies, they have already raised a generation of people who had grown up in an atmosphere shaped by the negativity caused by their lies.
It’s like how a relationship between two individuals can be poisoned by suspicion; even if in the end the suspicion is ultimately revealed to have been unfounded, the actual time lived in suspicion has already strained the emotional ties. But with two individuals at least they can sit down and work things out; with two large groups of people it would require that each group has a supreme leader able to inspire absolute loyalty from their respective group, and then the two leaders can work things out. Without such leaders, there is no way to be sure whether relations will improve by themselves…..
@ AS,
I know you’re probably not coming from a European perspective regarding Islamophobia (which is a term I can’t stand personally) but in Britain there’s always been friction between Muslim and Christian to a certain extent, certainly in the north west of the country pre-9/11.
Post, of course it was heightened. But there was always a section of radicalised Muslims and the counter of the extreme-right which I’m sure you know of such as the National Front, C18 etc etc.
Mandrake is right. I remember my classmates making racist jokes when I was only 7 or 8 years old! It was vile and I found myself having to constantly make an effort to ignore them.
Regarding the Paul Weston picture - I would like to point out that many people will say ‘That doesn’t prove anything. He’s just wearing the skullcap as a sign of respect’. That is another thing that Liberalism has done to our society and another example of how absurd and naive they are. You can try telling them that no other group of people is so sensitive that they would demand that you imitate them in order to ‘show respect’, but they feel that the Jews are justified in their hypersensitivity and paranoia because of the Holocaust and never stop to consider that these traits are dangerous. You can try telling them that it actually isn’t a mark of respect to imitate someone when you are not one of them because it is insincere and that if they really do think you must imitate them to show respect then this implies that they really do think that every group that does not imitate them or who believes differently to them is disrespectful to them, proving that they see all other groups as enemies. But they will never consider these basic things. That is why I don’t think we can use Liberals - because they are not capable of thinking rationally.
Liberalism is virtually impossible to ratify with our philosophy and ideal. The problem is Liberals themselves in the recent sense regard themselves as Bernard Shaw did as the ideological heavyweight who are 100% correct in all matters and are waiting for the rest of humanity to catch up to them. See the Fabian society and Frankfurt school for proof. They’re not truely liberal at all, but are totalitarians in the worst sense of the word, a mixture of extreme arrogance, egoism and humanism wrapped into one revolting ‘ism’.
Agreed, although if you look into the history of the Fabian society you’ll find that it started off extremely well.
“they really do think that every group that does not imitate them or who believes differently to them is disrespectful to them, proving that they see all other groups as enemies.”
Anthony, actually it doesn’t matter whether you imitate Jewish practices or not, Jews will still see you as a Goy. This is the real point about Judaism: it is about identity, not behaviour.
___
“waiting for the rest of humanity to catch up to them”
mandrake, this part is their main problem. Our most immediate aim is to get them to consider biology. What if a large fraction of people are genetically incapable of catching up? What if some people are simply genetically barbaric? What then?
My worry is that political discussion that takes heredity into account is currently dominated by rightists. We need to get leftists to transition en masse from downplaying the importance of heredity to society to acknowledging its importance and then rejoining the discussion representing leftist attitudes. Those who fail to make this transition (ie. liberals) will simply be ignored as time goes on, so we need not worry about them. The real danger is that many people currently in the process of transition to hereditarianism are unaware that it is possible to be both hereditarian and leftist, and thus end up discarding leftist attitudes at the same time as they discard egalitarianism.
From this page:
http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/platforming/
Today there are millions of caring people who defend egalitarianism out of a confused sense of duty because they know in their hearts that racism is wrong, but who are becoming increasingly demoralized in such defence because they know in their minds that egalitarianism is indefensible. We must deliver to them the simple and magical revelation which they have been subconsciously waiting for, namely that rejection of egalitarianism need not imply acceptance of racism, but on the contrary can – through racial idealism - genuinely serve the noble goal that egalitarianism claimed to serve but in fact never did.
Also this page:
http://aryanism.net/politics/foundations-of-the-true-left/
The day on which the False Left is discarded can be the day that Aryanism is mainstreamed, but only if enough people, in discarding the False Left, do not discard with it the emotions of leftism, which are idealistic, romantic and beautiful at heart. As Aryanists, our most important preparatory work as we wait for the collapse of the False Left is to keep alive these priceless emotions at all costs, for it is by these emotions alone that our ideology, and our bloodline that underlies our ideology, can be appreciated for what they are.
‘My worry is that political discussion that takes heredity into account is currently dominated by rightists. We need to get leftists to transition en masse from downplaying the importance of heredity to society to acknowledging its importance and then rejoining the discussion representing leftist attitudes’.
Exactly, AS. This is why I praised the Fabian Society in my last comment. Not as it is now, but as it was 100 years ago.
AS,
I’m not the type who interacts with everybody at school, so maybe my judgement is wrong and this has been the situation for a while. In any case, while certain people have been tending towards the right in the colloquial sense, only lately have they been less PC and more ZC, making comments about “Muslim invasions” and stuff like that. While I have been able to hinder their attempts at misinforming others, it’s a shame that I can’t switch their view - or those of others, anyway - away from the discussion “Is everything fine with Muslims?” to “Is everything fine with Jews?”
AS, SS: I expect that you’re both right and it varies in different populations. Mandrake and I come from a place whose population has an extremely high Gentile component. But AS is right that Islamophobia is increasing in the population as a whole.
Oh no, don’t make a mistake, this place is filled with Gentiles too. Only now are the Gentiles switching slowly to the next stage of Zion - the stage you see more of.
“I’ve seen a rise in Islamophobia in my school”
My school too - http://www.wesh.com/news/central-florida/florida-girl-attacked-after-wearing-hijab-to-school/24271022
Yes, Islamophobia is breeding well here in the U.S.A., but nobody outside the Muslim community in my area really cares like Europeans, or Australians do.