I have not been able to get into any kind of Christmas mood this year. The far-right terrorist attacks on refugees and the wider right-wing rhetoric regarding the refugee crisis looms over all social atmosphere. In the self-proclaimed “Christian” countries that have shut their doors to refugees (which some rightists - starting with Victor Orban - have had the gall to claim is a defence of “Christianity”!), all the Christmas decorations, music, etc. now visible on their streets are a sick lie, for they pretend to celebrate the birth of one whose teachings they do not even try to follow:
“Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me. … Whatever you did not do for one of the least of these [my brothers], you did not do for me.” - Jesus
Meanwhile, the only people who understand the Christmas spirit are far too busy to have time to celebrate it in the usual way. I am referring, of course, to the many admirable volunteers who have been spending all the time they can spare to helping out at asylum centres. Here is just one such individual out of many:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/13/athens-lawyer-guardian-to-refugee-camp-children
But these are only individuals. At most they are leaders of small towns (such as the mayor of Riace and others mentioned with praise in comments of previous posts). Without national-scale state support, there is only so much that they can do even with the best of intentions. And only a few states so far have responded dutifully to the refugee crisis. Besides SNP Scotland, which I have been praising all year:
I know of only Canada which has recently been demonstrating a positive attitude (and managed to work a Christmas party into the aid, see first video):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsre7RN9uzY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1assPzIYIo
Germany has taken in a large number of refugees, but has utterly failed in its duty to protect them from far-right terrorism, as well as in arresting and punishing the far-right terrorists. And while many Germans have also (to their credit) welcomed refugees and volunteered at asylum centres, their welcoming attitude and even their volunteering do not by themselves prevent the far-right attacks. And this is the crux of the matter, which we have discussed to death in private through past years: most present-day people with the Sun qualities lack the Lightning qualities, and thus are useless in the fight against the enemy that possesses the Lightning qualities in abundance (though of course absolutely no Sun qualities). Of those who are willing to volunteer at an asylum centre, how many are also willing and indeed eager to kill with their own hands the arsonists whom they see throwing Molotov cocktails through the windows of dormitories in the middle of the night, endangering the lives of heaven knows how many people sleeping inside? This is why we are losing. The far-right, by their terrorist violence, are making the refugees afraid. The good guys, meanwhile, are not making the far-right afraid. This is our problem. Of course it’s supposed to be the government in charge of retaliatory violence, but when the government idles instead of retaliate, and citizens do nothing except wait for the government to cease idling (which it will not, because the backlash against refugees is part of the Zionist agenda), then nothing stands in the way of the far-right from continuing and indeed expanding their operations, resulting in more and more innocent victims and more and more damage.
If they are not stopped, eventually it won’t just be refugees that the far-right attacks using these same methods; they will turn their arson and baseball bats and knives and the rest of their terror arsenal against anyone and everyone whom they perceive as a threat to their (here comes their magic word again!) identity:
http://news.yahoo.com/austrian-wing-activists-stage-mock-beheading-migrant-advocates-105151471.html
(Those among ethnic minority natives who think that by siding against refugees they are winning the favour of rightists are not only cowards but also fools; they will be the ones who will get targeted next. It goes without saying that those who sided against refugees totally deserve whatever happens to them, but not the others who have stood with the refugees.)
And this applies also to the states that have refused to take in refugees in the first place. Here is the problem:
http://news.yahoo.com/un-rights-groups-urge-hungary-end-anti-migrant-214427556.html
“Urge”? Just how do these PC groups think they can “urge” Hungary to welcome refugees? If Hungarians had it in their hearts to welcome refugees, they would have done so already. They haven’t because they don’t. There is no “urging” them, any more than there is “urging” Israel to vacate the territory it currently holds. This is what exasperates me about how embarassingly delusional many PC leftists are. Hungary itself does not “urge” refugees not to turn up; it builds a wall (using Israeli border security equipment, by the way). The only correct responses to this are economic siege and, if that fails, military invasion. For those who have not noticed, Hungary has been added to our Boycott page on the main site:
http://aryanism.net/about/boycott
(By the way, siege means more than boycott. When I say siege, I mean states using their militaries to physically stop all resources from outside of the target territory from reaching the target territory.)
Some rightist idiots talk about invading Iraq AGAIN(!!!!!) to create a “safe zone” for refugees; I say, if a “safe zone” is indeed needed, it would be a better idea to create it from part of the territory of Hungary. This reminds me of a discussion when another rightist idiot was going on about how, if people are swimming towards a full lifeboat after a shipwreck, the best thing the captain could do is hand out firearms for the passengers to shoot the swimmers with in order to prevent the swimmers from overloading and hence sinking the lifeboat. I retorted that if I were the captain, I would ask which passengers were willing to shoot the swimmers, then I myself would shoot those passengers (who would have been willing to shoot the swimmers), dump their bodies overboard and take in an equal weight of swimmers in the lifeboat space I just freshly created. In both cases some people would die, but my way of doing it is likely to leave my lifeboat with a higher-quality population than the rightist lifeboat. This is National Socialism in action.
The Third Reich could have done this (created a “safe zone” for refugees in Hungary) with ease. The Roman Empire could have done this with ease. The present-day EU, with no army of its own? Forget it! Hungary ignores the EU’s “demands” and “warnings” and “ultimata” because it knows the EU is not a military entity, and therefore has no real leverage. The only way the EU can get itself taken seriously is if it militarizes. I don’t see any sign of this happening even now, just as I have seen no sign that it would happen throughout the EU’s existence. So we have to conclude that the EU was planned from its inception to eventually fail; in other words, the breakup of the EU is part of the Zionist agenda. Which is what we have been saying anyway: the instructions to the masses are never the real plan, the predictable backlash from the masses is the real plan - EVERY TIME.
Until we organize paramilitarily, we are just as powerless as the EU. We can win every debate we engage in; winning these debates does not, on its own, stop asylum centres from getting set on fire, or refugees from getting beaten up on the street, or refugee dinghies from getting rammed by far-right speedboats. The only purpose of winning these debates is to demonstrate our superiority over our enemies in the eyes of spectators, but we must convert this belief in our superiority into organization for advancing our ideas in order for it to be meaningful. This is what I don’t see enough of our members trying to do. Of those who produce propaganda, it is not good enough to merely get people saying they agree with your message; you need to get people ASKING what they can do to help, before you can consider your propaganda successful. Aryanism.net is a successful propaganda operation by this standard, as we receive a steady stream of contact forms with offers to help us (which occupies most of Hashtali’s time just to deal with). What is letting us down is, when Hashtali replies to these contact forms and gets these volunteers started off on narrower projects, these projects (with a few exceptions) don’t attract volunteers of their own, and the project leaders aren’t concerned enough about this to review their approach or simply to spend more time and effort on their activism. Thus we fail to achieve the domino effect. We successfully knock over the first row of dominoes, but the first row of dominoes aren’t successfully knocking over the next row, which makes even our first success inconsequential.
Is it because of lack of morale? Do you think that, just because we started small and unknown, we are fated to remain so? The NSDAP started small and unknown too:
“Consider that only six or seven poor devils who were entirely unknown came together to found a movement which should succeed in doing what the great mass-parties had failed to do: namely, to reconstruct the German Reich, even in greater power and glory than before. We should have been very pleased if we were attacked or even ridiculed. But the most depressing fact was that nobody paid any attention to us whatever. This utter lack of interest in us caused me great mental pain at that time. When I entered the circle of those men there was not yet any question of a party or a movement. I have already described the impression which was made on me when I first came into contact with that small organization. Subsequently I had time, and also the occasion, to study the form of this so-called party which at first had made such a woeful impression. The picture was indeed quite depressing and discouraging. There was nothing, absolutely nothing at all. There was only the name of a party. And the committee consisted of all the party members. Somehow or other it seemed just the kind of thing we were about to fight against - a miniature parliament. The voting system was employed. When the great parliament cried until they were hoarse - at least they shouted over problems of importance - here this small circle engaged in interminable discussions as to the form in which they might answer the letters which they were delighted to have received.” - Adolf Hitler
Every movement that eventually became large started small. On the other hand, not every small movement eventually becomes large, in fact most do not. What keeps a movement small is not its initial numbers, but the attitudes of its initial members, few as they are bound to be. We have attitude problems, which Hashtali has already expounded on:
http://aryanism.net/blog/hashtali/the-ko-rule/
Until attitude improves, nothing effectual will get done.
It is ironic that one of the most heartening news articles I recently read was this one:
Despite my disagreement with almost everything the US military has done in recent times, I am able to sense a sincerity of concern and a conviction to duty from these individual soldiers and veterans who have expressed their solidarity with Muslims that is lacking among many of the people who casually laim to support our movement (but who, unsurprisingly, have not actually done anything to further it). JAM once expressed similar observations in a private discussion. Until we see more of this kind of soldierly attitude around here, it appears we will just have to hope these individual soldiers/veterans will do what they say they will do when the situation calls for it. The far-right will not go down without a fight, that is for sure. And this is what it comes down to:
“Whoever can conquer the street will one day conquer the state, for every form of power politics and any dictatorship-run state has its roots in the street.” - Joseph Goebbels
Years ago, before any of this had started, we were already recommending organizing paramilitary neighbourhood patrol groups. Back then everyone else thought we were being paranoid. Now it is clear that if everyone had promptly followed our recommendations then, we could have conceivably saved most of the hundreds of asylum centres from being burned down by the far-right arsonists this year. How many more times do we have to prove that we can see the game many moves ahead before everyone will start listening? In 2016 things are going to get even worse. We need those paramilitary groups. If you are reading this and would like to start one, or if you have already started one and are waiting for guidance on how to deploy it, please contact us:
http://aryanism.net/about/contact/
With just one paramilitary group in the correct location, we could be making news headlines within a matter of months with stories of superheroes stopping the arsonists and other attackers in their tracks. But in order to get that one paramilitary group in the correct location, we need dozens of paramilitary groups in total so as to cover enough locations as to have decent chances to coincide with locations that come under attack. (And don’t think the groups in other locations will be useless; eventually we will be involving them all.)
We need all the help we can get. If you think you can help, don’t hesitate to send in a contact form.
http://www.quiz2d.com/essays/plan/challenges/index.php
For anyone living in a two-party system (which is the case, more than often), I found this guide for those interested. While he may push for more of a libertarian-viewed party, I believe the Authentic National Socialist movement can definitely capitalize (for lack of a better term) off of this power vacuum.
For those that read this, the section that suggests the move away from extremism is, in no way, pushing for a drift away from radicalism. However, keep your radicalism compartmentalized to your noble actions, while your words spill only love. Love for your country, your people, your country’s values.
I found this article quite interesting. It talks about how the real Jesus was a Palestinian, not a Khazar Jew. It also emphasizes the common respect for Jesus by both Christians and Muslims:
https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/jesus-was-palestinian-and-why-it-matters/
@Isaac
Good to hear from you. Could you provide a status update (either here or in private, as you prefer) regarding ARNM progress? You currently have 114 Facebook supporters. Of these 114, how many are actively helping the ARNM, and how many more can be persuaded to actively help? If possible, please consider adding a Staff List page to your blog so that we can see who the active team are and what each person is in charge of.
Remember, the ARNM - being our first country-specific platforming project - functions as a template for similar projects in other countries. The more active and better organized the ARNM is, the more motivational and easier it becomes for others elsewhere to follow your example. So what you are doing is not only important for Australia, but also important for our wider advance.
___
Christmas positivity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mWJeSQezvY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jVO_G1_uyE
@AS - I’ve found a few people through FB, and will continue to run the ARNM site, but I’m actually starting to work on a new site: Australian Freedom Party (australianfreedomparty.org). Probably material from the original wordpress site will be adopted to this other site.
We’ve got myself as Party Leader, New Dawn as my right-hand man (Goebbels-type). I’m got Sam Royle from the Gold Coast who is quite keen to aid in our Neighbourhood Patrol or personal guard, whatever form this takes. Jaochim Schmidt has submitted some artwork by way of propaganda, which has been appreciated.
I want to start building our policies page - thinking a focus on economic/banking reform and also agriculture/foreign ownership, as important. Want to work towards solidifying our national economy, in a similar vein to how the NSDAP was working. Also our whole immigration/positive asylum page will do well, I think.
Kind of feeling my way through FB and other sources to what issues mean the most to people.
I’d be happy to hear any input you might have on working on this.
“Australian Freedom Party (australianfreedomparty.org)”
Nice! Would you like us to start linking to this site right now, or would you prefer to get more content up first?
“Sam Royle from the Gold Coast who is quite keen to aid in our Neighbourhood Patrol or personal guard, whatever form this takes”
What I suggest you aim for initially is a uniformed, visually impressive (ARNM logo flags, marching discipline, etc.) presence at counterdemonstrations to Islamophobe (UPF, etc.) rallies, a regular street community service event (litter picking, free food, or similar friendly gesture), and a regular paramilitary private training session for members only, along with video footage of the above which can be uploaded to YouTube.
“I want to start building our policies page – thinking a focus on economic/banking reform and also agriculture/foreign ownership, as important. Want to work towards solidifying our national economy, in a similar vein to how the NSDAP was working. Also our whole immigration/positive asylum page will do well, I think.”
Sounds good. Of course another important area is foreign policy reform, specifically not recognizing Israel/Israeli passports, throwing out the Israeli embassy in Australia and pulling out the Australian embassy in Israel), closer ties with anti-Zionist neighbour countries (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia), with a vision of eventually getting every country in Oceania to cease recognizing Israel. Switching support to (anti-Zionist) North Korea instead of (Zionist) South Korea is also relevant, as is consolidating relations with (anti-Zionist) Somalia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Iran. This needs to be ended and apologized for ASAP:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/australia-toughening-iran-sanctions-20130110-2cicy.html
Also, as you yourself have previously covered, this is an important objective:
https://austnatrevolution.wordpress.com/2015/05/13/removal-of-us-bases-from-australia-and-ultimately-all-of-oceania/
On the topic of refugees in Canada, I would say there have been mixed feelings, but the overall response is positive (definitely much more so than in most of Europe). There have been some complaints, from the Right, however:
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/kelly-mcparland-for-a-taste-of-trudeaus-2016-see-rachel-notleys-2015
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/letters-canadians-proud-to-set-an-example
The anti-refugee arguments so far have mainly had to do with the costs to taxpayers and how government should seek to first look after the interests of those born here who are facing difficulties. Of course, the situation isn’t that easy for refugees either:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/only-canada-charges-refugees-interest-on-travel-loans-advocates
The response which focuses on economics is selfish and has a narrow vision, but it is no where near as bad and vitriolic as what we’re seeing in Europe right now. I have not found too many people or news sources complaining about refugees being more likely to rape and commit other crimes, or about refugees being covert ISIS agents, for example. ZC Jew Ezra Levant is an exception to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp54tcZR6aA
Interestingly, there also seems to have been an email going around falsely claiming refugees receive more benefits than pensioners. I never got one.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/helpcentre/answer.asp?q=105&t=11
From the left, most people are excited that Canada is helping out. The main complaint from that side is that the Liberals, in their election campaign, promised 25,000 refugees by the end of the year, then changed it to 10,000 by the end of the year (with the other 15,000 by the end of February), and it seems they’re not going to achieve that either given only about 2,000 have made it so far (I might be wrong on the latest numbers). We’ll have to wait to see how this situation develops.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/12/26/syrian-refugees-canada-good-news_n_8878092.html
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/social-media-used-to-organize-aid-for-syrian-refugees-in-canada-1.2707930
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/exclusive-poll-finds-huge-support-for-syrian-refugees-1.2712799
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mccallum-syrian-refugees-update-year-end-1.3378261
I think it’s worth looking at why Canada has not developed a far-right in any way comparable to that of Europe. Indeed, the discussions that the far-right has made popular elsewhere about immigration, ethnicity, and religion (specifically) are nowhere near mainstream here, at least where I live. Canada takes in a large number of immigrants from all over the world, so it’s not an issue of it being impossible to create interethnic tension. The media certainly wastes no time in reporting endlessly on “Islamic” terrorist incidents, but each time the overwhelming response from Canadians has been solidarity with Muslims.
In my opinion, the reason for this is that multiculturalism and tolerance are a central part of the Canadian psyche and Canadian national culture. Prior to the 1950s, Canadians, or at least the anglophone ones, saw themselves as part of a wider British society and culture, to which they were quite loyal (which explains why despite Britain snubbing us in the early 20th century, anglophone Canadians were still enthusiastic to help Britain in war and colonial enterprise). Following the Second World War, attempts were made to define Canadian culture as something separate from Britain (not out of an anti-British feeling necessarily, except in Quebec). This culminated in the 1960s with Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau (the father of the current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Trudeau#Bilingualism_and_multiculturalism
The main reason for this policy was to solve the French-English divide, but that’s a topic for another time. Since the 1960s, Canadians have perceived themselves as being on the high ground when it came to multiculturalism, tolerance, human rights, and so on, and more generally a fair treatment of others.
In the early 21st century, the Right has wanted to change this and emphasize Canada as a Western nation. Prime Minister Stephen Harper, having been in office for almost a decade prior to the last election, was the main force behind this. His push for a more rightist Canada has been relatively mild (well, compared to what we see in Europe and the US anyway), though he’s occasionally touched on some “issues” like women wearing a niqab. (Coincidentally (not), the main inspiration for Harper’s reinterpretation is Jewish historian Jack Granatstein: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Granatstein)
The commitment of Canadians to multiculturalism and tolerance has been astounding considering developments in other countries for the last fifteen years, as well as the fact the Right has been in power here for the last decade. This is a testament to how central multiculturalism and tolerance are to Canada, and also explains why the far-right doesn’t yet have a foothold here. In order for the far-right to make its arguments appealing to Canadians as they are now, it would have to argue that limiting immigration, and other far-right policies, are supportive of multiculturalism, tolerance, and so on, which of course would make them look ridiculous. While other countries have a pre-PC identity which rightists want to bring back and are fairly successful in doing so, Canadian culture is defined by the PC culture, meaning rightists can only appeal to the British past, which Canadians are actually quite indifferent to.
So the PC False Left has been temporarily effective in holding the far-right back in Canada (though of course not PC is not ideal). This is why I’m worried about Justin Trudeau being elected Prime Minister. If his policies while in power discredit the False Left (something which couldn’t have as easily happened under rightist Harper), it will create a vacuum that makes it easy for the far-right to take central stage. Actually, the Canadian Right has done very well in the past decade in portraying its enemies as incompetent and impractical, while portraying itself as the source and enactors of all wisdom, though this is not really true. They could do this again while Trudeau is in power despite any future positive achievements. In other words, we had better be ready by the next elections in 2019.
@Hashtali
“the costs to taxpayers”
“falsely claiming refugees receive more benefits than pensioners”
If we were in government, what we could do is give each refugee a charge card first thing when they arrive, and all their expenses would be paid for by the state via this card which would record the total amount they have spent while their asylum claims are being processed, and then this total would be the amount they owe the state and would have to pay back, and they would not be allowed to leave until they have cleared their debt (interest-free, of course) with labour.
“From the left, most people are excited that Canada is helping out.”
This is where you should try to recruit from.
“the main inspiration for Harper’s reinterpretation is Jewish historian Jack Granatstein”
Thanks for the information!
“each time the overwhelming response from Canadians has been solidarity with Muslims.”
But does solidarity with Muslims translate into disgust towards Jews (especially ones like Levant) and Israel? Or does “Canadian tolerance” tolerate Jews and Muslims equally? Similarly, does solidarity with Muslims translate into disgust towards the far-right in Europe and the US?
“So the PC False Left has been temporarily effective in holding the far-right back in Canada (though of course not PC is not ideal). This is why I’m worried about Justin Trudeau being elected Prime Minister. If his policies while in power discredit the False Left (something which couldn’t have as easily happened under rightist Harper), it will create a vacuum that makes it easy for the far-right to take central stage.”
I agree.
This is also why multiculturalism is such a weak position. I have seen rightist rhetoric aimed at moderates claiming that the benefits of multiculturalism (which in the rightist narrative is limited to restaurants serving exotic cuisine, and other multicultural consumer products) can be retained with a monoethnic population simply by people from the monoethnic population learning the skills required to produce multicultural consumer products. This is not a false claim. A sound defence of multiethnic society must, therefore, not be based on the value of multicultural consumer products, but on the value of the multiethnic blood itself. PC, which denies the importance of race, has shut itself off from this route. This leaves only National Socialists able to pursue this route. Canada must be viewed as a country which attracts high-quality blood to it from around the world, and the chief application of this high-quality blood is not to produce multicultural consumer products, but to produce superior Canadians and eventually a superior unified Canadian (mono)culture.
(This is a re-post, my previous post did not show up. If it’s in the cache please post the original).
@Issac
Here is an example of the Lion’s shield uniform. What is missing from the photo is the white shoes (NB synthetic) and the white band above the left knee. The gloves are also synthetics.
http://tinyurl.com/na9ss9q
Also, since you are in a commonwealth nation, as I am, I would be careful with the word ‘paramilitary.’ I consulted council and learned that where I am it is technically illegal. If you cannot hire a lawyer, you should consult legal-aid. We ‘title’ ourselves as a ‘neighborhood watch’ because of that very reason. I urge you to find the status of the word ‘paramilitary’ where you live.
@AS
“The Roman Empire could have done this with ease. The present-day EU, with no army of its own? Forget it!”
You would be surprised at how difficult it is, at least here, to inculcate the ideas of militarism. Working with the homeless and welcoming newcomers, I have met many who are examples of superior race, and yet, they seem to not be able to understand the simple fact that words in the political area of life must be backed with force!
@Everyone
Happy New Year &
Remember the computer is a tool, nothing more. Real life and victory is out there amongst your friends, comrades and enemies.
@AS
“If we were in government, what we could do is give each refugee a charge card first thing when they arrive, and all their expenses would be paid for by the state via this card which would record the total amount they have spent while their asylum claims are being processed, and then this total would be the amount they owe the state and would have to pay back, and they would not be allowed to leave until they have cleared their debt (interest-free, of course) with labour.”
Good idea.
“But does solidarity with Muslims translate into disgust towards Jews (especially ones like Levant) and Israel? Or does “Canadian tolerance” tolerate Jews and Muslims equally? Similarly, does solidarity with Muslims translate into disgust towards the far-right in Europe and the US?”
Solidarity with Muslims can translate with disgust towards individual Jews like Levant, but does not translate towards Jews as a whole because there is no over-arching perspective on the matter. Holistic anti-Zionism is not very strong in Canada, so it’s not even a matter of being afraid to be called an “anti-Semite” yet. As for Israel, plenty of people who express solidarity with Muslims are also disgusted by Israel, but many of them see them as separate issues. (More precisely it could be said that they don’t see them as one issue, since those same people are not usually supporters of Israel (except for some two-faced right-wingers) but are merely largely indifferent towards it. Politics, especially international politics, don’t get as much attention as they should.)
In other words, “Canadian tolerance” generally tolerates both Jews and Muslims. This is something we’ll have to fix.
Solidarity with Muslims often does translate into disgust towards the far-right in Europe and the US. Those who express the most concern about these issues seem to be those who are also disgusted by Israel, but so far much of the population is not passionate enough to fight the far-right. Despite the warnings from other countries, the far-right still seems like something remote in Canada.
http://you.leadnow.ca/petitions/i-support-a-lifetime-ban-for-donald-trump-from-entering-canada
“Canada must be viewed as a country which attracts high-quality blood to it from around the world, and the chief application of this high-quality blood is not to produce multicultural consumer products, but to produce superior Canadians and eventually a superior unified Canadian (mono)culture.”
This is a good argument. I’ll consider it some more and get back to you later on it.
@Pandorastop
“(This is a re-post, my previous post did not show up. If it’s in the cache please post the original).”
I haven’t been able to find it. Sometimes they simply don’t go through. Usually when that happens, I press the back button and the post is still there, after which I copy it and paste it into the same page in a new tab.
“You would be surprised at how difficult it is, at least here, to inculcate the ideas of militarism. Working with the homeless and welcoming newcomers, I have met many who are examples of superior race, and yet, they seem to not be able to understand the simple fact that words in the political area of life must be backed with force!”
It’s different with the EU than in your situation, though. Europeans should quite spontaneously gather to fight the far-right given how suddenly it rose to prominence and how immediate their potential triumph is. In Canada, the far-right is still seemingly remote, and the other injustices present here are things that have been gradually implemented (which makes people used to them) or have not received too much media attention (e.g. TPP).
Also, the EU should have the political ability to raise an army in the same way the Canadian government can. A government doing it is different than a neighborhood patrol group.
Happy New Year to you too!
@Hashtali
“Usually when that happens, I press the back button and the post is still there, after which I copy it and paste it into the same page in a new tab.”
“Also, the EU should have the political ability to raise an army in the same way the Canadian government can. A government doing it is different than a neighborhood patrol group.”
No shit?
“TPP”
All around bad. Jewish all around.
“Europeans should quite spontaneously gather to fight the far-right given how suddenly it rose to prominence and how immediate their potential triumph is.”
A rabble is useless on it’s own. The people crave direction, obviously, or politics would not work. Waiting for a critical mass of some sort … is never going to happen. Right now in Europe the far-right is creating the direction… Because they are OUTSIDE, ON THE STREETS. Which is where everyone who wants to alter the direction of life should be.
http://www.thetrueleft.com
Hello fellow Aryanists
Recently I have translated “Naturalism vs Idealism” from the main site. I would like to ask you about the last paragraph from this article:
“It must be this attitude and no other that we aim to restore among all people capable of expressing it. Perhaps it is precisely this attitude, this sense of detached duty which naturalists do not and cannot understand (what David Myatt called the “Silence of the Warrior”), that will – when the time comes - give us the victory we have seen in our dreams.”
Could someone explain to me in a few simple words what is this “Silence of the Warrior”? Although I have red quite a lot of works of David Myatt I find this expression only in one text - an interview with Myatt titled “Islam, National-Socialism, and Honour “. http://david.myatt.tripod.com/islam-ns-honor.html
In this interview we can find a passage:
“However, the unfortunate truth is that many if not most of those who now call themselves ‘National Socialists’ do not understand honour and certainly do not live by honour. If they did, they would not spout forth the anti-Muslim rhetoric that they do, and they would certainly not rant on and on about how ’superior’ they are and how ’superior’ they regard their own nation, their own culture, their own people - or whatever - to be.
The reality is that the majority of those who now call themselves ‘National Socialists’ are not warriors and never have been, so they lack that balance, that awe of the Divine, that nearness of death - that the death of comrades - brings. Hence they have no reverence, no genuine respect, no silence of the warrior.”
So - correct me if I’m wrong - I understand this term (“silence of the warrior”) as combination of honour, humility and rejection of hubris (terms that Myatt emphasized in his Pathei-Mathos/The Numinous Way philosophy).
Happy New Year to all Aryanists!
@AM
“Could someone explain to me in a few simple words what is this “Silence of the Warrior”?”
It’s basically what was described on the page itself:
What the naturalists do not understand is that we are incapable of being deterred by their pessimism – not necessarily because we disbelieve it, but because it makes no difference to us. … We pursue the ideal not because we estimate it likely that we will succeed; we pursue the ideal because there is nothing else worth pursuing.
It is “silence” because in practice it involves neither intimidating others nor being affected by the intimidation attempts made by others against oneself. (This is why I keep telling Hashtali not to delete intimidating comments left here by far-rightists; we want as complete as possible a record of their behaviour for public display in contrast to ours.)
By the way, would you consider writing a political platform for Poland at some stage (preferably soon, considering the urgency of the situation)?
http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/platforming/
More than general ideas, your readers need to see how our ideology would be applied comprehensively to the specific case of Poland.
@AS
Thank you for your explanation. I was looking for some deeper meaning in that expression, but as it turned out - unnecessarily.
“By the way, would you consider writing a political platform for Poland at some stage (preferably soon, considering the urgency of the situation)?”
I’m afraid that at this point it is not possible. Currently I spend almost every moment of my spare time on traslations articles from main site or writing other texts for our blog. Especially translations are very time-consuming. And they are absolutely indispensable if the Polish reader has to get to know the whole philosophy and aims of Aryanism. We already have translated almost all articles from “Philosophy” section and most articles from “About”, “Culture” and “Religion” sections. Now I am focusing on translating imortant articles from “Politics” section - “Foundations of the True Left”, “National Socialism and Nazism”, “Immigration”, “Multiethnic society”, “Why Race Matters and Why ‘the Races’ Don’t” etc. I’m afraid that the creation of such a political platform is beyond my capabilities. For the moment, at least.
What do you think of this http://www.taoism.net/theway/sage.htm
@AM
While I sincerely admire your approach of wanting to establish fundamentals first, we are in such an emergency right now that I fear that by the time the fundamentals have been established, it will be too late, unless at the same time you are showing Polish readers that what we are saying has direct relevance to what is going on in the present time in Poland.
If you believe that translation is your personal forte and that you might not do a good job with writing the political platform for Poland, that is fine, but in that case could you find someone else who could write the political platform? Someone - even if not yourself - needs to be working on this ASAP.
@fred
Annoying but not dangerous.
Can some things in Taoism and Zen become apart of a True Left Movement?
@fred
I assume you mean “a part” rather than “apart”.
We consider Zen the most authentic form of Buddhism (and of course Buddhism as the most authentic form of Sramanism) since the fall of Maurya, as implied in these pages:
http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-1/
http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-2/
http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-3/
and we cite Zen as one of the bearers of the True Left during medieval times on this page:
http://aryanism.net/politics/foundations-of-the-true-left/
As previously mentioned, we will side with Taoism in any conflict between Taoism and Confucianism, but that’s about it. Consider what Jung was saying about Schopenhauer in the same paragraph: “He was the first to speak of the suffering of the world, which visibly and glaringly surrounds us, and of confusion, passion, evil — all those things which the [other philosophers] hardly seemed to notice and always tried to resolve into all-embracing harmony and comprehensiblility. Here at last was a philosopher who had the courage to see that all was not for the best in the fundaments of the universe.” I would count Taoism among those which try to resolve evil into all-embracing harmony and comprehensibility.
_____
Speaking of evil:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/12080851/German-police-hunt-gunman-who-opened-fire-on-refugee-shelter.html
Remember what I said about how far-right terrorism starts with Molotov cocktails and baseball bats, but eventually it will escalate to bullets and bombs? This marks entry to the bullet level. Didn’t take long, did it?
If the German government were dutiful, it would turn asylum centre territory into uniformed zones, where all refugees and all staff/volunteers must wear state-issued uniforms at all times, and anyone not in a uniform who enters the area would be shot on sight, and anyone caught impersonating a refugee/staffer/volunteer by wearing an unauthorized/imitation uniform would be executed in public. This is how it would have been organized in the Third Reich. This is why uniforms are an important part of statism (and no, I don’t have time to finish the Dress page, although I might if we had more people not only sending in contact forms but also actually following through with the projects we assign them). Once we are dealing with firearm attacks, this is what it takes to keep an area safe.
As for the Merkel regime, we’d be lucky if it even manages to arrest the shooter. Certainly the shooter even if convicted would not be executed, but merely imprisoned. And here’s the other thing we have to understand about far-right psychology: far-right criminals are not afraid of prison, because they believe their side will come to political power later, at which point they will be released from prison. Only execution begins to have a deterrent effect on far-right criminals, and even then not if the criminals have already reproduced, for in their traditionalist worldview they achieve immortality through their descendants. So the only significantly effective and ethical deterrent to far-right criminality is execution for the individual and prohibition of reproduction for all their identifiable descendants. Fat chance Merkel implements any of these measures, yet these measures are the measures needed to defeat the far-right - only Lightning can defeat Lightning. Therefore Merkel does not want to defeat the far-right, and is lying when she claims that she does. Just look at Merkel’s eyes when she pretends to criticize the far-right; do you see any fury in those eyes? Do you honestly think she in her free time imagines burning the arsonists at the stake and smashing the skulls of the baseball bat attackers and riddling the shooters’ bodies with bullet holes? She doesn’t even have the correct emotions (indeed if she did she would not have spent her entire career supporting Israel), so of course she would not have the correct policies!
Anyone reading this who has the correct emotions, send in a contact form:
http://aryanism.net/about/contact/
We don’t care about experience or skills (all that can be acquired), all we ask of you for now is the correct emotions, and we can use you somehow.
I would gladly do something for these poor souls but will I have basic necessities such as food, bed, clothing etc. covered? I would do anything but I also need to be able to support myself.
Do you support anarcho-syndicalists?
@LOZ
That all depends on you. The point about volunteering is that it doesn’t guarantee personal benefit (and often means foregoing it). But what exactly are you thinking of doing to help? How much time you’ll be able to devote to both helping others out and surviving yourself depends on the kind of work you plan to do.
@fred
http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-anarchism/
http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-communism/
—
As an addendum to AS’s last statement, we don’t care about current skills and experience. When you guys contact me, I ask for them because it’s better to give you something that fits your current abilities. But if your current abilities aren’t that great, no problem, I’ll still find something for you. Don’t hesitate to let me know you’re inexperienced; it’s better to work on something, experience or no experience, than to not answer and not work at all.
Back in the original post I was talking about the lifeboat, and here we see something along the same lines on a plane:
http://news.yahoo.com/palestinians-call-greek-action-israel-plane-apartheid-202143432.html
If the Jews were uncomfortable with the non-Jews on the plane, the Jews should get off the plane (and the airline need not refund their tickets, since it is not the airline unable to deliver its service but the passengers changing their minds), not demand the non-Jews get off. But the airline, seeing that the Jews outnumbered the non-Jews, tried to please the majority instead of doing what was ethical - they chose democracy over honour.
@fred
Anarchosyndicalists would side with the Jewish passengers in this situation, since they support direct democracy. In contrast, we as autocrats believe that the captain’s duty is to do what is ethical regardless of popularity.
http://aryanism.net/politics/government/
So long as present-day governments cling to democracy at the same time as they accept refugees, they cannot win the debate against the far-right, because it is indeed undemocratic to accept refugees when the majority does not want them. Only by ditching democracy can the governments tell those who dislike refugees that they are entitled to choose to live elsewhere, just as refugees are.
Found this very cool site from local people in Balmain who want to stand with Asylum seekers. I particularly like their satirical videos, which have drawn from negative attention, but attention nonetheless. They are quite witty and really carry the point quite well in a very “Aussie” way. True Aussie nationalism.
http://www.ourstralia.org/
http://www.ourstralia.org/#videos
@Isaac
Excellent! I especially like their slogan: “It’s un-Australian not to help.” This is the kind of rhetorical approach we want.
Their facts page is good too:
http://www.ourstralia.org/facts/
As soon as you get into contact with them, remember to emphasize to them the importance of a paramilitary wing. Propaganda alone will not be enough.
@Pandorastop & Hashtali
It looks like the hysteria has spread to Canada:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv0kXtExe5E
http://news.yahoo.com/canada-pm-condemns-pepper-spray-attack-syrian-refugees-004811792.html
Of course, there is also positivity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qlL_b7igbg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkRKJ6LrHQo
but woollen hats do not stop pepper spray, that’s the problem. Neither does Justin Trudeau “condemning” the terror attack. “Condemning” a far-right terror attack does about as much good as “urging” Hungary to re-open its borders. Only Lion’s Shield will make a difference. Give them hell!
@AS
“It looks like the hysteria has spread to Canada:”
Yes. To be completely accurate, this kind of stuff didn’t start happening just now. There seems to have been some escalation since the Paris attacks two months back. (People also seem to be more aware of far-right growth in the USA than in Europe, from personal interaction, so maybe that’s also a factor.) However, it doesn’t seem to be a general trajectory yet; we’re still in the phase where isolate attacks/threats are the norm. Here’s another one from a while back:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-police-arrest-man-mask-joker-muslims-1.3324089
“Give them hell!”
Gladly!
Following the escalation to bullets shortly after New Year as noted in my comment above, now not even one month into 2016 and, exactly as I predicted, it has escalated to bombs:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hand-grenade-thrown-at-refugee-shelter-in-germany-in-latest-attack-on-asylum-seekers-in-wake-of-a6842221.html
I have nothing more to prove. Everything has turned out as I warned long ago that it would. If more people had listened earlier, we could have prevented this. Let’s make up for lost time now:
http://aryanism.net/about/contact/
Stockholm pogrom: Crowd of masked men hunt and beat up non-Swedes
https://www.rt.com/news/330697-sweden-immigrant-pogrom-stockholm/
@CR
The Swedish Resistance Movement, a neo-Nazi group, claimed the attack.
If we were as organized as we should be, at this point we could simply declare the SRM a valid Ahimsa target and our Swedish paramilitary would do the rest. The problem is we are not even half as organized as we should be.
It is especially poignant that it is the SRM which did this, as Swede (the commenter whom we debated back in November) was an SRM (part of NRM) member - in all likelihood he was one of the attackers in this recent attack. He is probably laughing at us now. Winning debates against him and people like him won’t stop them from beating up ethnic minorities (yes, ethnic minorities, do you honestly think the Joetnar care whether they are immigrants or natives?):
They were beating up anyone who didn’t look like ethnic Swede.
only Ahimsa will. All of our activism that does not lead to recruiting volunteers for anti-far-right paramilitary groups is UTTERLY USELESS. If you live in a part of the world where there is no threat of far-right terrorism, then fair enough, keep doing what you are currently doing, but if you live in a part of the world where far-right terrorism is currently occurring or where it may soon begin to occur, please review your activism portfolio and adjust it to incline as heavily as possible towards organizing anti-far-right paramilitary groups.