So-called “conservative Jews” have begun to come out in large numbers to blame problems of society on “liberal Jews”. We can be sure to see more and more of them as the economy continues to fall apart. And the right-wing ZC Gentile idiots (especially the race preservationists) are falling for it.
As usual, we must reject Jewish terminology. Historically, Jews have been neither conservative nor liberal with consistent loyalty. What they have always been is ahead of the curve. They anticipate every swing of the Gentile collective consciousness years and decades before the Gentiles themselves do so, and a group of them race to the cusp of the swing to help it into motion. The late-arriving Gentiles then assume the Jews who express these views (often more eloquently than their Gentile counterparts) are assets to their movement. Jews are no more conservative or liberal than cattle herders are eaters of grass or eaters of corn. Herders give the cattle what the cattle are in the mood to eat. Herders then eat the cattle. Not all the cattle at the same time, though, as they need a sustainable cattle population. This is why a world under Jewish control will never treat one group badly all the time, nor everyone badly at the same time. Therefore those whose concern is merely how their own group is treated will always eagerly accept the false victory that Jews give them when it is their turn to be treated well again, and nothing will ever be solved.
The way to break free of control by those who are always ahead of the curve is simple: leave the curve.
“Through ignorance, passion and hatred, decisions are taken which, in their injustice and lack of logic, contain the seeds of fresh conflicts.” - Adolf Hitler
Conservatism is injustice; liberalism is illogic. Both are unacceptable. Nature must be neither accepted (as by conservatives), nor denied (as by liberals), but acknowledged and then overcome.
While it is a sign of our progress in the propaganda war that Jews trying to lead the dissent this time are at least forced to blame other Jews, it is also - as I repeat over and over again - increasingly the case that simply acknowledging disproportionate Jewish influence is not enough, even redundant. Anyone by now can point out Israeli and international Jewish power. The question is: what is their plan? Knowing who the enemy is while being completely misled over their plan is hardly an improvement.
This is why I have (despite criticism by some who downplay the importance of verbal precision) insisted on retaining the term ‘Zionism’ in my vocabulary. Judaism is the membership; Zionism is the agenda. Many people spreading anti-Jewish propaganda either do not have a clue about Zionism or are Zionists themselves. Either way, they are confusing the hell out of newcomers because there is no agreement among this propaganda on what Jews are trying to do to us! There has been a vague idea that the more people speaking out against Jewish power (for whatever reason) the better, and that inaccuracies in their description of Zionism should thus be overlooked. I suggest now is the time for a stricter attitude. Anyone who blames Jews but misrepresents Zionism should be treated as a liability to the movement, whether out of ignorance or malice. Because if our picture of Zionism is inaccurate, our countermeasures will also miss the mark.
For example, we can no longer tolerate anyone who claims that Jews are allied with one or more non-Jewish ethnicities/religions in a genocidal plot against another ethnicity/religion. Amazingly, it seems that every group has people who claim their group - and their group alone - is targeted for extermination by a mysterious alliance between Jews and everyone else. This is nothing but a simple inversion trick of projecting the Jews’ own age-old fear (that all non-Jews will one day join forces to overthrow THEM) onto us. As each group reacts to this projection by becoming suspicious of other groups, the projection looks more realistic to other groups who then react in the same way, and so on until civil war results (the true Zionist agenda). Here is a good example of how to deal with such people:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7R4wg4YrY
(This clip featured a black Gentile, but of course some white Gentiles have similar beliefs that require demolishing. (“Anyone with the least bit of tactical sense knows that you never purposefully destroy your own cover. If not for the existence of the people known as ‘whites’, Jews would be unable to pass themselves off as ‘white’.” - John Alan Martinson Jr., responding to moronic assertions that white extinction is on the Zionist agenda.))
The best thing to do in this regard is to adopt our Aryanist vocabulary (see the Glossary page). Dump the old group identities. There are no black, white, brown, yellow races, only Aryans, Gentiles and Jews (each of which come in all ethnicities). There are no Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, etc., only Aryans who consider Jesus, Mohammed, Siddhartha, etc. as their teacher, Gentiles who vainly want to associate themselves with the power of these names, and Jews who have deliberately infiltrated the institutions inspired by these names. There are no conservatives or liberals, nor capitalists or communists, only unradicalized Aryans choosing the lesser of two evils, Gentiles who believe one will serve themselves better than the other, and Jews manipulating both for Zionism. There is no Eastern civilization or Western civilization, only Aryan voices drowned beneath Gentile voices led by Jewish voices. There are not even male and female, only Aryans (uncorrupt youth), Gentiles (corruption by masculinity) and Jews (corruption by femininity). (By the way, Henry Makow is a Zionist agent.)
All group classifications can be deconstructed in this way; you will always find Aryans, Gentiles and Jews underneath. These are the only dividing lines that should be drawn right now. There are only Aryans trying to draw these lines before time runs out, Gentiles who do not understand these lines, and Jews who know the threat posed to them by these lines. Get drawing!
Entries (RSS)
Douay-Rheims Bible:
There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28.
Our Aryan New Testament does not mince its words! “Bond nor free” meant, in those days, “Rich nor poor.” Of course St. Paul knew all are literally “free” in Our Lord Lucifer. A more accurate translation would therefore read:
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, there is neither Rich nor Poor, there is neither male nor female, for you are ALL rightfully Universal Aryan Citizens together in Our Lord Lucifer Christ Jesus.
All should enjoy the blessings of Aryan (in those days, “Roman”) Citizenship! Then our “free will” would be much more genuine and the endless empty talk of freedom would be something more than an anti-Aryan judaic self-righteous self-satisfaction.
Veganism is a non-Aryan degeneracy. I argue that only the fair treatment of subjected animals and is the Aryan way, not abstinence and oversensitiveness. Hitler was not a vegan but vegetarian, he drank milk. And the SS and Gestapo were famous for their use of leather boots and leather jackets.
There is a great difference between these terms because vegetarians consume animal products such as milk and eggs. Vegetarianism originated in antiquity and likely was of Aryan origin (first recorded in 6th century BCE Greece and India). But “Veganism” was made popular after ww2. by (pacifist goy) Donald Watson in Britain and by (jew) Rubin Abramowitz in US. The purpose - inflicting guilt and weakness upon goys.
Those impressive and muscular Aryan types from National Socialist sculptures cannot be developed only by having genetic predisposition. They require consumption of proteins.
Why should it be considered immoral to take milk from a cow ass long the owner provides an animal with decent living and care? It is also not immoral for the ruling class to subject commoners to their will provided that they offer them in return all the state services. Egalitarianism, slave abolitionism, communism, feminism and liberalism are not Aryan ways but the tradition based on hierarchy. Those Aryan charioteers mentioned in Homeric myths or in Vedas had the right to “exploit” their horses for war. Agricultural Aryans were right to use cattle to plough their field and the man has the right to subject his woman to his will.
Liberal politicians concern themselves primarily with spending and expanding Jewish derived Credit, Concervative politicians concern themselves with then reducing and ‘paying off’ Jewish derived Debt. Regardless, whichever ‘side’ of politics ‘wins’ the staged election, they will borrow and spend more from Jewish Central Banks than the previous politicians.
I agree with the above two responses except that there should not even be any commoners. The “ruling class” would then have to subject itself to its own warrior discipline with only FUNCTIONAL distinctions among themselves. Castes determined by mere natural biological birth are unjust and ignoble. Inevitably the nobles will then jealously guard their privileges while despising their responsibilities and always soon manipulate their monarch or kill him if he should resist. Feudalism was reasonably good when Europe was younger and more innocent but now we must demand much more of ourselves. This could be described as a mature feudalism in which a Fuhrer-Prinzip guides an entire population of freeman with equal justice but different legal codes for different professions.
A similar idea applies to the difference between men and women. Aryan woman is also a “man,” which is why historically they were included within the category of “man.” In standard English there are men, women and the category to which they both belong, man or human. Literally “woman” means “the wife-man” or the man responsible for feminine duties. Of course genetics will influence who does which functions best and this is most evident within domestic life and within marriage. BUT within marriage there should also not be any female creature to be subjected to a male will. Aryan women are quite literally simply a different type of men, and not any less truly “men” than the males. Their feminine FUNCTIONS are inferior to masculine functions and the two sexes are by their functions unequal sexually, but women are entirely equal to males as human beings. Basically in the Aryan Golden Age a spiritual reincarnation will gradually replace gross material reproduction (aka sex) and sexual inequality will become irrelevant. Aristocratic pleasure will be achieved by a lack of ejaculation, in ways well known to Cathars and other such magickal noble spirits.
“Castes determined by mere natural biological birth are unjust and ignoble”
Yes it appears that justice and nobility in Aryan nature are not determined by mere biological birth or hereditarianism. Even Aryan blood itself is not passed on from mother to son, no blood passes from the mother to the developing embryo in the womb, neither from the father, the Aryan child is manifest with its own unique blood, it appears but we know not where from, the origin of our blood and our virtues and nature is unknown to us. This fact alone dismisses any notion of hereditary title or priviledge, caste, class, etc.
[...] http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/drawing-the-lines-of-opposition/ [...]