Let me clarify the use of the term “Gentile”. Firstly, it is not an alternative for the popular term “Sheeple”. Sheeple are the people who take no consequential action at all (and hence can be strategically disregarded, which is why I rarely even mention them). Gentiles are the people who take counterproductive action.
The term “Gentile” derives from the Latin “gentilis”, which means “belonging to a nation”. Gentile motives, interests and stakes are necessarily tribal, albeit without the extent of duplicity of Jews. Gentiles overlap with the group that David Myatt used to call ‘Homo Hubris’, characterized by what he called “arrogant aggression”, which I refer to as the hunter archetype.
“They [Homo Hubris] … have never been able to control, for very long, their primal instincts, their lack of respect for the numinous, and their innate bullying savagery, although they have managed, or rather connived, to convince themselves, and sometimes others, that they, and their ways, are somehow “civilized”.” - David Myatt
Many people use the terms “Gentile” and “Goy” interchangeably. This is sloppy, and I discourage it. “Goy” is a reminder of how Jews view us, namely as people outside of their circle of tribal altruism. It refers to the group’s status of selected victimization, not to the characteristics of the group. Nor is it limited to use only when Jews are the oppressor. As I often say, in the eyes of humanists, non-humans are Goys. The Aryanist ideal is a world without Goys ie. without oppression.
“Gentile” is the term that describes the characteristics of the group. Gentiles are prone to manipulation (as opposed to the Sheeple, who are prone to passivity). We call this a slave personality. For example, anyone who prefers slavery to death is a Gentile, because whenever Jews want them as a group to do something, they can simply convince such people that they are in existential danger as a group if they do not do as required, and they will - every single time - do as required. The process is no different than how the Jewish medical industry sells us ‘healthcare products’ by scaring us with advertizements showing people with health problems. (The Sheeple continue eating Jewish-produced junk food. The Gentiles start buying Jewish-produced nutrition supplements.)
Gentiles, even those who complacently describe themselves as “Jew-wise”, are not on our side. They are the people who complain that there is a bomb inside the room, and then do everything they can to detonate it(!). Even if they (correctly) identify Jews for building the bomb, they themselves are the ones who will ultimately cause the explosion, indeed the ones on whom Jews are relying to cause the explosion - and take the fall for it when history is subsequently written. Gentiles are no less than the EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL ITSELF, the fabric whose existence enabled a bomb to be built in the first place. We call them Gentiles to distinguish them from Aryans who - while just as much Goys in the eyes of Jews - do not share this overriding reflex of self-preservation and thus will reject such Zionist manipulation. (Jews have a special name reserved for Aryans in their own language, which I will come to in another post.)
Many of the “Jew-wise” Gentiles with whom I have debated have advised me to educate myself on the Jewish goal by reading The Camp of the Saints. They never question why the originally French novel was translated into English - and hence made accessible to a much larger readership - by Norman Shapiro (Jew). In a nutshell: “Jew-wise” Gentiles promote to me a book that Jews promoted to them, telling me that the book reveals the Jewish goal. You cannot make this stuff up.
The Lord of the Rings is a far better story than The Camp of the Saints. In the past I have referred to Boromir as a Gentile specimen. Boromir considers himself rather heroic for his commitment to ‘his people’, which is why he kept trying to steal the Ring. This is the problem with Gentiles: it is extraordinarily difficult to convince them that they are part of the problem, even though it is blindingly obvious to everyone else watching. Would we trust Boromir to tell us how the Ring works? If not, then why should we trust Gentiles to tell us what Jews are doing? (Fun exercise for fence-sitters: every time you read a racist blog, imagine Boromir was the author. Then attempt to take the writings seriously.)
Aragorn to Boromir: “I will not lead the Ring within a hundred leagues of your city!”
In light of this, I have a new propaganda term to recommend: the Boromir Syndrome (BS). This is what we should use as often as possible to describe the mental condition of “Jew-wise” Gentiles every time they open their mouths. We can also apply this idea to graphics and video edits. In the same way as we’ve been superposing the Israeli flag on Alex Jones videos, we could start superposing Boromir’s face on David Duke videos!
There are ZC Gentiles (racist/Islamophobic, pro-Jewish). Then there are BS Gentiles (self-proclaimed “Jew-wise” and anti-Jewish, but remain racist/Islamophobic). In some ways, the latter are worse.
“… anti-Semitic only in outward appearance. And this was worse than if it had made no pretences at all to anti-Semitism; for the pretence gave rise to a false sense of security among people who believed that the enemy had been taken by the ears; but, as a matter of fact, the people themselves were being led by the nose. The Jew readily adjusted himself to this form of anti-Semitism and found its continuance more profitable to him than its abolition would be.” - Adolf Hitler

Entries (RSS)
‘Gentiles’ interests and instincts are tribal, we can substitute - ‘belonging to a Nation’ with belonging to a clan, tribe, nation or race. Aryans are not a race, nation, tribe, clan. Being an Aryan is not dependent on being related by birth within a race, tribe, nation, clan. (GEN, Latin; to beget, produce. NATAL, Latin; belonging to ones birth)
Now important point! Nationalism is non-Aryan, so is racist, tribalist, clan like behaviour. National Socialism is not radical Nationalism, it is not an extreme form of Nationalism! National Socialism was and is Folkism, Aryans are a Folk. Aryans as the heirs of National Socialism will describe themselves collectively as ‘ A Folk’.
Maybe, for newcomers to the blog, explain what exactly “Folkism” is, or what a collective Folkism may entail (extensively, rather than a quick glossary reference). For we all know how misunderstood the term “Aryanism” is, why not explain its natural political extension in depth? At quick glance, it would seem that “folkism” is nothing more than another form of nationalism (prioritization of the folk over non folk, or for satires sake, white interest over non-white interest).
Greetings Colin,
I have just finished a post on my blog which will be of help to you, in it I explain our National Socialist heritage and compare some key differences it has with Nationalism. An organized Folk following Aryan principals don’t believe in survival for survivals sake, preservation of a folk or nation does not depend on the enslavement or extermination of other nations.
Go to the ‘information’ menu tab, then select ‘partners’ then ‘Siddharreich’, to read more.
“Aragorn knelt beside him. Boromir opened his eyes and strove to speak. at last slow words came. ‘I tried to take the ring from Frodo’ he said. ‘I am sorry. I have paid’…….’Farewell Aragorn! Go to Minas Tirith and save my people! I have failed.”
Listen to the words long written down, and believe!
Interesting distinctions. Very useful, in fact. The comparison to Boromir can be quite effective, and also, since were are making allusions to LotR, Isildur is an apt example of this too. In the prologue to the “Fellowship of the Ring” (as shown in the film version) Isildur chooses to take the Ring of Power for himself, believing he can do good by using his enemies weapon against him. Yet we all know how that turns out. Boromir suggests this too and for both it was the first step in their seduction and eventual destruction.
Greetings,
The definition of National Socialism is “folkism in which the nation exists to serve a genuine purpose”.
My question is: what purpose(s) would an Aryanist nation possess? What are the goals of an Aryanist nation? Perhaps this is too broad of a question as it can deal from anything from politics to economy and so forth, but an example or two would be beneficial.
Greetings Marduniya,
The quick answer would be to create man anew! An Aryans view is that all races of the planet are badly degraded and it is our mission to improve the general stock of mankind, physically, mentally and above all morally! Quality over quantity is the rule of thumb for Aryanists as we are quite aware of the population crisis facing the earth as well.