Even after all this time, I still underestimate how low Jewish behaviour is willing to sink. Basically Jews killed a Palestinian child’s brother, took a photo of the child crying, edited the photo and used it for an ad asking for donations to Israel:
On the subject of donations, let me get in a quick word on the issue of donations to Haiti following the (possibly engineered) earthquake. In principle, I totally believe in charity, and - despite Zionist historians attempting to depict National Socialism as an uncaring ideology - Hitler not only promoted charity but considered only National Socialists capable of sincere compassion (as opposed to mere patronizing gestures of the same):
“If positive Christianity means love of one’s neighbour, i.e. the tending of the sick, the clothing of the poor, the feeding of the hungry, the giving of drink to those who are thirsty, then it is we who are the more positive Christians.” - Adolf Hitler
The current problem is that we can no longer trust the mainstream ’aid’ organizations, many of which have been actively involved in Zionist agendas such as forced vaccinations and forced water fluoridation. We cannot be sure whether any money we send will reach Haiti in the first place, nor can we be sure whether it will be used to actually help the Haitians:
http://voiceofvenom.com/blog/articles/jews-harvest-organs-in-haiti/
Therefore I suggest that, unless you personally know someone who lives around there and who can get things done directly with the money, do not donate. Instead, donate to the activists devoted to breaking the Jewish criminal power structure, only after which will genuine charity efforts have a chance to flourish.
From the Aryanist perspective, genuine charity should be about ending problems, not merely fixing them until they rise again. Therefore any charity that does not deal with reducing population and improving demographics is no charity at all. All poverty is created by population increase in a finite habitat. Everything else (industry, commerce, migration, etc.) does not create poverty, but merely changes how it is distributed in space and time. Genuine charity, therefore, must not be (as it currently is) just another of many influences on the distribution of poverty, but should focus its power on preventing its creation.
As I have said before (and as Hitler predicted), world population will decrease drastically very soon. If we do not decrease it ourselves, nature will decrease it for us. The difference is that natural selection is guaranteed to get rid of the kind, conscientious and honourable people (of all ethnicities), whereas National Socialism will at least attempt the opposite. Natural selection is guaranteed to leave behind a population of prolific, amoral survivalists which will not hesitate to explode its numbers all over the planet again in the future once conditions permit, whereas National Socialism aims to leave behind a population which will know better. This is what real charity should be about.
Entries (RSS)