Uniting Anti-Zionists

“The Aryan Collective Unconscious unites, seeks to complete, to conceive the unus mundus, the totality of the human being, deifying him. … The Jewish Collective Unconscious is always exclusive, takes the part against the whole, fanatic, intolerant, proselytizing, dividing men, tending to produce chaos.” – Miguel Serrano

The psychopolitical war being fought today can be considered a direct continuation of WWII. While Zionist Britian, Zionist America and Zionist Russia succeeded in terminating the regime of National Socialist Germany, they did not succeed in destroying an idea inherent within even the most elementary application of National Socialism that Jewish domination over non-Jews can easily be overthrown by any society willing to sincerely unite across all other lines towards this objective. Therefore it was strategically necessary for Zionists to continue the war through media and academia not only to defile the name of Hitler and obscure the ideals of National Socialism, but also to condition non-Jews to be uninterested in authentic revolution (though not necessarily uninterested in Zionist-backed revolts against designated scapegoats), in conjunction with economic war to ever tighten Jewish control over resources to obstruct non-Jews from physically implementing revolution.

Large-scale retaliation began with internet communication that brought formerly disparate intellectual holdouts together internationally through the sharing of information and analysis that both confirmed the extent of Jewish control already in place and exposed ongoing Zionist operations to acquire still more Jewish control, especially regarding the brutal occupation of Palestine by Israeli invaders and the systematic weakening of all non-compliant countries in Israel’s vicinity (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc.). We consider the information war already won, as Jews have no way to recover their secrecy or conduct any new operation without risking further exposure. The first line of Zionist defence has been easily defeated.

We are now in the phase of propaganda war. The second line of Zionist defence is to prevent us from reaching agreement on a solution, and thus fail to translate awareness of the problem into necessary action to remove it. The best way to achieve this would be for Zionist agents and useful idiots to agitate discord between different groups of non-Jews, which appears to be exactly what is occurring. Revelation of Jewish domination over all non-Jews, instead of forming a solid rapport between affected groups, suspiciously ran in almost perfect concurrence with increasing hostility between non-Jews of different ethnicities and religions. More suspiciously still, ethnic and religious tension is greater among self-proclaimed opponents to Jewish domination than among the general population, the opposite of what we would expect were the tension not deliberately engineered. Of particular note is the residual negative prejudice towards Muslims by people who should frankly know better, having seen Muslims – the presently most actively anti-Zionist religion, and suffering the most as a result of their activism – being set by the Jewish media to take the blame as a group for everything from 9/11 to minor street crime.

“A rootless international clique sets the peoples against each other. They are the people who are at home everywhere and nowhere.” – Adolf Hitler

The astute among us see this clearly: we are being divided, and as we are divided, so shall we be conquered.

Three-Way Conflict

“Jews are practical people … They do not object to people being anti-Jewish; they merely object to their being dangerous.” – Savitri Devi

The first step in all warfare is to understand the sides involved. We see not two sides in this conflict – Jews and non-Jews - as commonly visualized, but three sides. Specifically, we see two distinct opponents to Jewish domination with fundamentally irreconciliable characters. We consider it crucial that all who wish to join the conflict first learn to tell them apart.

Gentiles do not wish members of their own tribe to be Goys, but have no problem with everyone else staying as Goys. Their opposition to Jewish domination is primarily selfish (or envious) in motivation. They are not morally repulsed by the phenomenon of slavery, they merely dislike the role of slave. Their aim is to displace Jews from dominance so that their own tribe can take that position. They may be anti-Jewish, but they are not anti-Zionists.

Aryans believe that nobody should be viewed as a Goy. Our opposition to Jewish domination is primarily righteous (and furious) in motivation, and hence only we qualify as genuine anti-Zionists. We are equally morally repulsed by slavery whether Jews or any other group are behind it, and whether we or any other group are the slaves. Our aim is to use Jewish domination over non-Jews as an example to generate antipathy to the entire phenomenon of tribalist behaviour.

Elrond: "Drop the Ring!" Isildur: "No."

Elrond: “Destroy the Ring!” Isildur: “No.”

From the Aryan perspective, the moral difference between the Jew and the Gentile is cursory: both are guiltless oppressors at heart; one merely prefers to oppress through subtle deception (in the tradition of his herder archetype), the other through undisguised force (in the tradition of his hunter archetype). It makes no tactical sense for Aryans to team up with Gentiles with the idea of overthrowing Jewish tribalism first and worrying about Gentile tribalism later. This is because, as tribalists, Gentiles love themselves more than they hate their enemies, hence would never sacrifice themselves in order to destroy their enemies. But if the primary motive of each faction in the alliance is self-preservation, then no faction would be willing to make sacrifices for other factions, which means it would be in truth no alliance at all. Thus we must concede that Gentiles are intrinsically incapable of uniting across ethnic and religious lines.

“I believe in the brotherhood of man, all men, but I don’t believe in brotherhood with anybody who doesn’t want brotherhood with me.” – Malcolm X

Knowing this, the best Zionist tactic would be to promote Gentile leadership among anti-Zionists, thereby keeping the movement divided and ineffective. As a countermeasure, we must constantly point out similarities between Gentile tribalism and Jewish tribalism, the logical conclusion of which is expansion of the anti-Zionist movement into a wider anti-tribalist movement (which should be close to the hearts of all Aryans in any case).

A general anti-tribalist movement actually has the advantage of immunity to the common accusation that we are singling out Jews for criticism, and thus would be excellent for our progress. But it requires that support for Gentile opponents of Jewish domination (those who hypocritically refuse to relinquish their own tribalist attitudes even as they condemn such attitudes among Jews) be abandoned in favour of exclusive support for Aryan anti-Zionists (those who espouse no tribalist attitudes and therefore are alone truly entitled to condemn such attitudes). Genuine unity will only occur if we distance ourselves from those who by their nature are incapable of uniting, hence be left only with those who are capable of uniting. Genuine unity among anti-Zionists must be founded on shared nobility.

“We stand as revolutionaries in the world of today and are branded as such. But our thoughts and actions must in no way be determined by the approval or disapproval of our time, but by the binding obligation to a truth which we have recognized.” – Adolf Hitler

For anti-Zionists seeking unity, we recommend several simple lines of action:

1) Criticize other tribalists (Gentiles) as well as Jews

Without taking the focus off Jewish crimes, we must recognize that this behaviour of in-group/out-group double standards is disgusting regardless of who practices it. Those who turn a blind eye to Gentile tribalism are connivers.

2) Criticize those who present anti-Zionism as the means to achieving petty nationalist objectives (e.g. “We have to deal with the Jews first if we want to kick the Muslims out!”)

Those willing to fight an enemy merely for tribal self-interest would be equally willing to sell out to the same enemy in exchange for tribal self-interest. They are traitors.

3) Raise more awareness of Jewish crimes against victims not of your own ethnic or religious denomination

We are all in this together. Whoever seeks salvation only for one’s own group is no different than a soldier who flees the battle to save himself and leave his fellows in danger. They are deserters.

Anti-Zionism cannot tolerate connivers, traitors or deserters. Remove these, and we guarantee that unity will follow.

Break

Related Information