National Socialism and Nazism
“A great idea had been misused by small men. Himmler was the evil symbol of that.” – Alfred Rosenberg
National Socialism is the ideology which lifted Hitler to power in Germany. Nazism is a separate phenomenon which occurred primarily in Britain and America after WWII ended. Nazism is the result of Jewish-led Zionist Allied wartime propaganda to demonize National Socialist Germany and selective confessions elicited via deception and duress during the Nuremberg Trials, which subsequently became the ‘official’ portrait of National Socialism for the Zionist Allies in WWII, the backdrop to the endless stream of Holocaust fiction. This misrepresentation was then applied by some British and Americans who saw in Nazism the solution to the fears of their day (for Britain the loss of empire and the influx of immigrants, for America the 1960s civil rights movement). Thus, Nazism – a maliciously distorted form of National Socialism originating in Zionist Allied countries, and then ironically even spread back(!) into Germany (e.g. NPD) – has largely replaced authentic National Socialism in the world’s eyes and become the ideology of modern neo-Nazis. This is perhaps the result of what Hitler himself said: “National Socialism was not for export.”
While neo-Nazism has remained a fringe phenomenon, it has indirectly benefited opportunistic racist groups which have been able to perniciously set up non-racists as one extreme and neo-Nazis as the other extreme, thereby presenting their own ’common sense’ racism as a false middle ground towards which to lure the poorly informed, and thus generating inter-ethnic division in accordance with the Zionist agenda.
Awareness of National Socialism as a system wholly distinct from Nazism was initially restricted to a few apolitical historians, who lacked the philosophical perception to properly understand the ideology, and a few eccentric ideologists commonly known as ‘esoteric Hitlerists’, who disagreed even with each other on National Socialist theory. (It should be noted that within Hitler’s cabinet had been similarly dramatic ideological divergence, which led to a humourous claim of the time that there were as many versions of National Socialism as there were NSDAP members.)
But while some communication occurred between the esoteric Hitlerists and a few honest leaders of neo-Nazi groups, it quickly became apparent (to the considerable dismay of both parties) that bloc-conversion of neo-Nazis to authentic National Socialists was not feasible, for the very reason that the vast majority of those who had been initially attracted by Nazism had exactly the wrong type of personality for National Socialism.
“Dear Savitri, … You simply must try to understand the almost unbelievable difficulties I face in working here with Americans … they are just plain ignorant and often unbelievably dumb.” – George Lincoln Rockwell
Correspondingly, those among the general population with personalities most suitable for National Socialism were exactly those most likely to be put off by Nazism and hence unlikely to study the subject deeply enough to discover the misrepresentation. This simple Zionist trick of associating a noble ideology with an ignoble label has made gaining support for authentic National Socialism extraordinarily difficult. (This trick is hardly new. The same has been done with Gnostic Christianity - the true teachings of Jesus – being given the label ‘Luciferianism’, with similar effects.)
For example, National Socialists view Muslims as allies by default, both remembering the former support of Hitler from the international Islamic community and seeing the continuing sacrifices of Muslims in their struggle against Zionism. Neo-Nazis, on the other hand, typically hate Muslims out of plain xenophobia. David Myatt personally converted to Islam in a valiant attempt at diplomacy. The result? Muslims understood and accepted his gesture, while neo-Nazis called him a traitor.
The next significant mark in the revival of National Socialism is recent, beginning with anti-Zionists looking for positive political options and culminating in the short-lived OWNP (One World Nazi Party). Having the multiethnic John Alan Martinson Jr. as the face of the campaign (combined with the provocative party name) was unprecedentedly effective in breaking the monoethnic stereotype, but it turned out that the anti-Zionist community was another poor population from which to find National Socialists. The majority of anti-Zionists pride themselves in their skepticism and distrust, qualities which indeed enable them to unravel Jewish conspiracies in the first place, but which by the same token make it hard for them to take the idealistic leap of faith necessary for National Socialism.
“They are dividing us. And as you are divided, so shall you be conquered.” – John Alan Martinson Jr.
It is clear that little further progress will be made so long as the discussion continues to tolerate academics interested only in endless historical nitpicking, barbarians prepared to debase National Socialism to the lowest possible level in order to suit themselves, and cynics who join the conversation without actually believing that the ideology is viable. So how should we proceed? Rudolf Hess provides a solution that we recommend: “Do not seek Adolf Hitler with your mind. You will find him through the strength of your hearts!”
Why insist on reconstructing National Socialism from history alone when it is but a name for the political system that will inevitably be expressed by truly noble and selfless thinking? It is time to emphasize that what we saw in National Socialist Germany was hardly the completed system, but only the tiniest first steps towards it. It is time to discuss not what National Socialism was or is, but what it should be.
Further Information
Related Information
Archive
