Multiethnic Society
“The importance of the individual states in the future will no longer lie in their political or statal power. I look to them rather as important ethnical and cultural centres. But even in this respect time will do its levelling work. Modern travelling facilities shuffle people among one another in such a way that tribal boundaries will fade out and even the cultural picture will gradually become more of a uniform pattern.” – Adolf Hitler
Can a liar already exposed as a liar continue to manipulate his victims? Yes, by advising the opposite of what he wants people to do, so that people fall into his trap by rejecting his advice. Anti-Zionists should consider the possibility that this tactic - commonly known as the reverse-bluff - is currently in operation.
Some people promote rejecting all mainstream media, and accepting alternative media in proportion to its ideological distance from the mainstream media. These people are behaving as if Zionists were unaware that alternative media exists. It makes more sense to consider that mainstream media and some alternative media may be collaborating, with the former (whose credibility has already been destroyed) reverse-bluffing to channel credibility to the latter, which can then easily manipulate their supposedly “awake” viewers.
Controlling both sides
To see the reverse-bluff in action, go to an online news article that allows reader comments. The article will say one thing, then a few detailed and highly rated comments will say the exact opposite. Is the real function of the article to deflect the reader towards agreeing with the dissenting comments, while deceiving him that he is a critical thinker for ‘rejecting’ the ideas of the article?
This is especially relevant to the issue of multiethnic society. Every mainstream article written in apparent celebration of ethnic diversity in society is making its readers more racist, and this is the exact intention of such media: not to encourage unity, but to sow discord. (The same is true of the implementation of affirmative action based on ethnicity: not to close income gaps, but to inculcate distrust towards the competence of ethnic minority colleagues and resentment towards their very presence.) The growing popularity of the racist far-right is a sign that all this is working.
How to Scam Gentiles
“These beasts, it is true, fall asleep again every time when they have drunk their fill of blood, and at such time can easily be riveted into their chains. But if they be not given blood they will not sleep and continue to struggle.” – Protocols of Zion
Marine Le Pen (Gentile), professional liar
Only a fraction of people (Aryans) genuinely have no racist tendencies, while the remainder (Gentiles) are dominated by primitive tribal instincts that prevent them from comfort with multiethnic interaction. The mainstream media promotes a multiethnic society, leading Gentiles – against their discomfort – to go along with it. These Gentiles one day discover via alternative media that other Gentiles exist who share their feelings! They suspect that the mainstream media has been manipulating them. As they investigate, they discover that Jews own the mainstream media, but that Israel – unlike their countries – is for Jews only. Thus the Gentiles jump to the conclusion that the objective of Zionists is to “mongrelize our race out of existence”, which their tribal instincts find alarming.
Now imagine the Gentiles encountering the Aryans, who unlike themselves never had to suppress any instincts in order to function without stress in a multiethnic society. The Gentiles would likely mistake the Aryans as either brainwashed or Zionist agents, because Gentiles just cannot imagine people whose minds work differently than their own. Hence Gentiles would dismiss the ideas of Aryans – who see that the true Zionist agenda is to start fights between non-Jews that allow Jews to gain more control over everyone – and pull the anti-Zionist movement off track without the slightest clue what they are doing.
Gentiles like to boast that they are dissidents. They ignore economists’ projections from the early 2000s that the next economic crisis would facilitate a far-right surge, in other words that they are in fact merely following the mass behavioural curve exactly as predicted. Gentiles like to boast that political correctness is losing its power. They do not consider the possibility that it was planned to lose power and produce conflict on Jewish demand. Gentiles like to boast that people are “awakening”, which they define as embracing racism. We respond that sleeping sheep cannot be herded. This technique of getting people angry or frightened so that they eventually throw themselves at a Zionist-prepared solution is what we call backlash politics or pressure valve politics (or even Ziongasm denial politics). They build up the pressure and then offer a means to release it, thereby maintaining control while providing the illusion of change.
Gentiles laugh at the Jewish media for giving publicity to far-right organizations and boosting their popularity. They do not realize that the media is trying to put the far-right into power.
Criticism? Or free advertizing masquerading as criticism?
What Is Tolerance?
“We have this folk of ours that is not to be defined as a race, and this is now clear to millions. However, when I began my career twenty-five years ago, this was not the case; then I was always told by bourgeois circles: “Yes, folk and race are one and the same.” No, folk and race are not the same! Race is a component of blood – a blood kernel, but a folk is very often composed not of one but of two, three, four or five different blood kernels.” – Adolf Hitler
How often does the Jewish media tell us that we are a “tolerant” multiethnic society? And how often do we see the Gentile who thinks he has broken through Zionist brainwashing by turning to racism? Are Gentiles really as stupid as described in the Talmud?
What does the word “tolerance” really mean? It means putting up with something you dislike. Therefore, when the Jewish media declares – over and over again - that we are “tolerant”, what are they really programming within you? Are they programming you to respect other groups? No! They are programming you to hate other groups, and then reminding you how much you have put up with from other groups. Tolerance presumes disgust, or else there would be nothing requiring toleration. The Jewish media is saying: “You know and we know that everything wrong with society is caused by those nasty Third Worlders, but let’s ignore this.” They are telling you to ignore an illusion that they themselves planted in your head.
If I tell you not to think of a penguin, you will think of a penguin. Calling for “tolerance” is just a subtler version of this elementary psychological trick.
Multiethnic society was set up by Jews, but never with the intention that it would actually work. It was set up on purpose to fail, in order to provide cover for the final Zionist takover when it collapses into chaos. Therefore the only way to upstage Zionism is to make it work, against all Jewish expectations.
Don’t think that the Penguin looks Jewish! (See what I just did?)
What Is Populism?
“Hitler did not need to do more than what he did: to unmask the mythic cosmic Enemy, the incarnation of evil on earth, for the first time in the history of the world: the International Jew.” – Miguel Serrano
It is now common for the Jewish media to describe far-right groups as “populist”. This is another word trick.
The correct definition of populism is support of the welfare of ordinary people - the opposite of elitism. For example, Occupy Wall Street is a genuine (albeit confused and ineffective) populist movement. Authentic National Socialism is also a genuine populist movement, and a much more realistic one by recognizing that populism can only result from absolute leadership by a noble individual.
On the other hand, the far-right groups described as “populist” by the Jewish media are anything but. The far-right has no concern for the welfare of non-Jewish ethnic minorities, who are as ordinary as anyone (certainly not elites in control of international banking, finance and big business and the media), therefore it clearly does not champion ordinary people as a whole. Rather, its agenda is to placate the ethnic majority by using non-Jewish ethnic minorities as scapegoats. The accurate description of the far-right is not “populist”, but race-baiting.
But by referring to the far-right as “populist”, the Jewish media subtly redefines ”ordinary” to mean ”ethnic majority”. This hypnotizes majority listeners into forgetting that non-Jewish ethnic minorities are ordinary people too, or even people at all, so that empathy ceases to be applied to them. Simultaneously, it sends a message to minority listeners that they will never be regarded as ordinary by the majority, so that they might as well not even bother trying. In this calculatedly asymmetric way, each side is poisoned with a different kind of negativity towards the other, which prevents the forging of trust between them. This is known as the Freemasonic Chessboard Trick.
The best way to mitigate the effect of this trick is to expose it and use this awareness as part of the basis for a true populism among its intended ordinary victims against the elite Jewish tricksters.
Demographics of Segregation
“In this war – as almost always – the unjust are known by their arrogance, their pride and their bullying nature. In this war – as almost always – the just are known by their honour, and by their noble behaviour.” – David Myatt
Our enemies cite examples of ethnic self-segregation even in settings where integration has been systematically imposed (e.g. schools) as evidence for the failure of multiethnic society. In response, we suggest examining their own examples in more detail.
Yes, there is self-segregation in schools. But looking within the student population will trivially reveal some groups less self-segregated than others. Which ones? Firstly, self-segregation increases with age (ie. with corruption). Furthermore, even among older students, non-delinquent students (except Jews) are less likely than delinquent students to socialize along ethnic lines. An even better observation comes out of examining student subcultures. The best ethnically integrated of all are usually the sci-fi/fantasy fans who intuitively resonate with mythical archetypes, and whose archetypical identity (also known as racial idealism) is stronger than their racial identity. They associate themselves with what they want to be, rather than what they are.
In the adult population we find the same patterns. Which sub-populations are by far the most self-segregating? The prison population and the street gang population. Which sub-populations are the least self-segregating? The ascetic religious population (note that Judaism is not ascetic), and the military population (note that we consider the IDF and armed forces of other pro-Zionist states not military, but mercenary terrorists). In other words, the less folkish the pursuit, the more likely there to find ethnic lines. Racial identity occurs in proportion to the extent to which people lack connection to purpose. Racial identity is a sign of collapsing civilization and descent into barbarism, which is exactly why we are presently seeing it on the increase.
“The German army does not exist for the purpose of being a school in which tribal particularisms are to be cultivated and preserved, but rather as a school for teaching all the Germans to understand and adapt their habits to one another. Whatever tends to have a separating influence in the life of the nation ought to be made a unifying influence in the army.” – Adolf Hitler
None of this is denial of biology. We are completely open to the possibility that traits such as archetype intuition and folkism themselves have a genetic influence, and should be demographically promoted (in fact we suspect they are Aryan racial traits).
Attempts to force ethnic integration among the prison population will fail, but simply because the prison population (with the exception of imprisoned revolutionaries and other enlightened iconoclasts) is largely a population of low-quality people. And likewise where ethnic integration fails in present society, it is simply because too many people in present society are too low-quality for it. The failure is of the people, not of the policy. We simply need a higher quality population.
Summary of Zionist trick:
1) Promote a policy that they know most people are too degraded to successfully execute.
2) Blame the policy instead of the people for the failure, allow their agents to reverse the policy and thus gain public trust.
Summary of Aryanist countermeasure:
1) Blame the people instead of the policy for the failure.
2) Make the policy work by gathering sufficiently high-quality people.
Can You Wield Lightning?
“So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community.” – Adolf Hitler
In National Socialist Germany, Wehrmacht soldiers were responsible for keeping their valuables safely locked so that they would not be stolen by other Wehrmacht soldiers. SS men, in contrast, were forbidden from using locks to protect their valuables, as it insulted the honour of other SS men to even consider them possible thieves. Which is the policy for nobler people?
Similarly, racists ethnically self-segregate as an effective defensive measure against other racists. Non-racists, in contrast, oppose this, as it insults the honour of other non-racists. Which is the policy for nobler people?
Obviously, applying SS policy to Wehrmacht-quality people would not work. Applying non-racist policy to racist-quality people would also not work. Aryanism emphatically does not propose that all people of all ethnicities can get along. We however propose that the high-quality people (Aryans) from all ethnicities can indeed get along, and it is these people who need to unite rather than follow the reactionary racism of the low-quality people (Gentiles). Hence our motto: UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY. The difference between us and the racists is that they bash the higher-quality people for behaving in a higher-quality way than themselves. Imagine if Wehrmacht soldiers bashed SS men as “naive” for not using locks for their valuables. This is what racists sound like when they talk to us.
The Tower of Babel
A popular mythological argument against multiethnic society proposes that Yahweh (the Jewish god, not the Christian-Mohammedan god) intended us to be separate races and accordingly divided us. Almost always omitted is what prompted Yahweh to make such a decision. The Tower of Babel is actually a myth about a united prehistoric humanity building a tower to transcend earth and reach heaven. Yahweh, fearing that we would succeed and consequently overthrow his rule, panicked and gave every race a different language, with the result that communication between builders broke down and construction failed. Thus the Tower of Babel, far from a ridiculous experiment doomed from the beginning, was a folk project so likely to succeed and so likely to thus threaten Jewish hegemony that it had to be sabotaged by deliberated division of its folk through giving them separate racial identities.
The myth warns against cultural relativism (the idea that different cultures need not aim to reach agreement), which we have never denied is promoted by Jews. But what anti-multiculturalists misunderstand is the reason behind such promotion. It is hardly because Zionism fears ethnically homogenous societies (which took turns expelling Jews more than 100 times only to soon let them back in), but because it fears all non-Jews resisting it in synchronicity. The truth is that multiculturalism (many directions in one society) and ethnic separatism (many directions in many societies) are both derived from cultural relativism and hence, while dressed as a mutually hostile dichotomy, work in a pincer movement to fragment what could otherwise become a multiethnic folk (one direction) easily able to defeat Zionism, and furthermore, if we believe the myth, complete our construction project and leave this material existence behind once and for all.
Be not misled by reverse-bluffing Zionist agents and frightened Gentiles who refer to ”Babel” or “Babylon” with pessimistic connotations. Look instead to the optimistic connotations which Hitler saw in the term when he said: “Berlin, as a world capital, can make one think only of ancient Egypt, it can be compared only to Babylon or Rome. In comparison with this capital, what will London stand for, or Paris?” Authentic National Socialism is about building independent nations, not closed nations, much less internally fragmented and divided nations. And the true social architecture of united humanity is neither melting pot nor salad bowl, but a distillation tower, at whose summit only the noblest will arrive. Will you meet us there?
Further Information
Related Information
