“One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew ‘The Great Master of Lies’. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.” – Adolf Hitler
It is useless to be aware that Jews lie without understanding how they lie. A common mistake is to believe, having learned about Jewish dishonesty (e.g. ‘Holocaust’ hoax), that every single statement made by a Jew is a lie. Actually, a liar who lies all the time would not be very successful at deceiving anyone, since he would be extremely easy to spot. A skilled liar tells a mixture of truth and lies in order to confuse his victim. For example, when Jewish schoolteachers teach pupils about the cruelties of historical racism by Western civilization against non-Jewish ethnic minorities, they are telling the truth. The only lie they add into the mix is to present Jews also as victims of historical racism, the exact inversion of what they really were. Skillful dismantling of the Jewish lie is as much about accepting the truthful parts (even if they are unflattering) as about rejecting the false parts. Boasting about ”taking the Red Pill”, as many useful idiots do, is counterproductive in this regard, since the Red Pill analogy suggests that everything we used to believe in the pre-Red-Pill old days is false (which is of course not the case, as explained above), thereby setting us up for a new round of being deceived as we recklessly throw out the old truths along with the old lies. The fundamental flaw of the Red Pill analogy is that is suggests the deception consists of only one layer, when it actually consists of many.
The power of the Jewish lie is its ability to deceive you even when you know it is trying to deceive you, so long as you do not see where the deception enters the picture. This is comparable to a magician’s illusion: just because you know the magician is performing a trick does not guarantee (nor even improve the chances) that you will catch the key instants when the elements of trickery are executed, so that the illusion will still succeed. (It is no coincidence that so many famous performance magicians are Jewish. All performance magic is basically herding of the spectators’ attention and senses, at which Jews excel due to their blood memory.)
Those familiar with performance magic will be aware that skilled magicians often try to finish executing their trick before you realize they had even started, and therefore before you thought it was necessary to begin paying attention. Much the same is structurally true of the skilled liar. The Jewish lie tends to deceive not in its statements, but in its use of the words that constitute its statements. Those who attempt to seek the lie in the statements are already thoroughly fooled. Even if they find factual falsehoods within the statements, they have not found the real lie, which functions on the level of controlling what words are used to debate over truth and falsehood in the first place.
Useful idiots who do not understand the Jewish lie like to boast that the Jewish lie is like a house of cards that comes crashing down once pushed. Actually, the house of cards was built so that the gullible will push it down and think he has destroyed the lie. It would be more accurate to say that the Jewish lie is like the deck of cards itself, that can be used to build house after house for the gullible to spend his entire life pushing down. This illusion of achievement for the gullible, playing on his hubris, is perhaps the most potent ingredient in the Jewish lie, which knows that the best method of slavery is to make the slave unaware of his own enslavement, or indeed to create simulations of the slave’s escape from slavery. This is precisely the case with the current shift from PC to ZC or even BS; the useful idiots think they are ”waking up” or have “taken the Red Pill”, when in fact they are merely following on schedule the backlash scene in the Zionist script without knowing it – the same as every Zionist-predesigned reactionary group throughout history. We should start calling such useful idiots Red Pill junkies in order to make our point absolutely clear.
“You cannot imagine to what extent the wisest of the GOYIM can be brought to a state of unconscious naivete in the presence of this condition of high conceit of themselves, and at the same time how easy it is to take the heart out of them by the slightest ill-success, though it be nothing more than the stoppage of the applause they had, and to reduce them to a slavish submission for the sake of winning a renewal of success.” – Protocols of Zion
In particular, most people are selfish on either an individual or a collective level, hence tend to be most suspicious of lies whose negative consequences affect oneself or one’s own group, and least suspicious of lies whose negative consequences affect other individuals or groups. Hence it is always easier for the Jewish lie to encourage us to fight one another than to encourage us to harm ourselves, which is exactly what is currently happening. To this end, the Jewish lie is also never the same to two different victims whenever these victims are also likely to communicate with each other and thus compare notes. Instead, different lies are told to these different victims in such a way that when they do compare notes and find that their notes do not match, the mismatch is designed to make each victim suspect the other of being deceptive rather than suspect they have both been deceived by the same outside agent.
We recommend that the theory of magic be added to the studies of serious anti-Zionists.
Anatomy of a False Classification
“What for us is an attempt to get to the bottom of things and express the inexpressible, becomes for the Jew a pretext for verbal juggleries.” – Adolf Hitler
The purpose of a false classification is to train subconscious notions that would otherwise make no sense. To see this, it is necessary to understand that whenever Jews describe people in subsets, they are actually drawing lines of opposition between those subsets and then herding their victims along those lines until they crash into each other.
The method of the false classification is to mix subset dimensions such that certain pairs of subsets appear mutually exclusive when in fact they are not. Imagine someone who constantly compares between “women” and “drivers”. This is a false classification: it mixes the subset dimensions of gender and car use. It is informational garbage, but its purpose is to instill a subconscious notion that driving is somehow alien to women, with the effect of leading women to believe that they can neither be drivers themselves nor even have empathy for or shared concerns with drivers.
This is exactly what is going on when ZC propaganda chooses to constantly compare between “Europeans” and “Muslims” – it is mixing the subset dimensions of ethnicity and religion. The effect, of course, is to train its targets in the subconscious false notion that Muslims are foreign to Europe, thus weaving Islamophobia and ethnocentrism into one ZC thread. (They reinforce this same notion each time they refer to ”Muslims in Europe” rather than “Muslims of Europe”. On the other hand, Jews are always referred to as “Jews of Europe”.)
Anatomy of a False Dichotomy
“Like the Indian idol Vishnu they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion.” – Protocols of Zion
The purpose of a false dichotomy is to pretend to cover the entire spectrum of opinion of a given topic, so that people pick their position from within the confines rather than outside of it. It is crucial to understand that the Jewish lie never tries to convince people to choose one position or the other within the false dichotomy; all it tries to do is keep the debate as a whole inside the false dichotomy.
One easy way to construct a false dichotomy is by verbal obfuscation. This consists of constructing a dichotomy out of two apparent poles so as to lead people to assume all possible positions lie somewhere between these poles, thereby discouraging them from considering the options outside.
“Gun control” vs “Gun liberty”
Wiener Savage (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between firearm-loving conservatives who believe that firearm ownership is a fundamental liberty, and firearm-hating liberals who believe that all civilian firearm ownership should be banned. This leads either to conservatives being better-armed than liberals, or police and criminals being better-armed than civilians, neither of which threatens Jewish power. It, however, hides the truth that truly threatens Jewish power: that the people who hate firearms most are the ones who most deserve to be armed, because firearm ownership is not a liberty but a duty.
“Debt currency” vs “Gold currency”
David de Rothschild (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between creditbugs who support creating money as debt, and goldbugs who support backing money by gold (or other precious metals). This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that money should be backed by the labour of a citizen of the country inside which alone the money has purchasing power.
“One has to grant that extraordinarily clever tactics are being used, and that it takes some intelligence or sound instincts to see behind the Jewish facade. … They are virtuosos at the art of transformation. They can appear in a thousand forms, yet are always the same. If one has caught them, they claim injured innocence and send their guard of pity on ahead to beg for mercy. But if one extends them even a finger of pity, they chop the whole hand off.” – Joseph Goebbels
Another easy way to construct a false dichotomy is by verbal misassociation. This consists of putting two irrelevant or even contradictory terms together as though they are two facets of the same idea, and then presenting this fake idea as one pole of the dichotomy. Whether the gullible agrees or disagrees with this pole, he has been deceived. The only way to not be deceived is to destroy the pole by pulling the terms back apart.
“Science & Reason” vs “Religion”
Sam Harris (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between anti-religionists who believe that religion is intrinsically unscientific and unreasonable, and religionists who try to prove that religion supports the findings of empirical science in order to prove that religion is reasonable. This leads to empiricism – hence materialism – becoming the standard by which the value of various religions are measured, thereby hiding the truth that threatens Jewish power: that Aryan religion was originally designed as a way to transcend the material.
“Freedom & Democracy” vs “Tyranny”
Tzipi Livni (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between proto-libertarians who believe they have to defend democracy in order to support freedom, and proto-fascists who believe they have to disparage the concept of freedom in order to destroy democracy. This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that democracy is a form of tyranny (of majority opinion over minority opinion), and thus the quest for freedom begins by rising against democracy along with all other forms of tyranny.
“Racism & Anti-Semitism” vs “Anti-Racism”
Abraham Foxman (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between racists who believe that opposition to Jewish domination is merely part of their glorified allergy towards anything and everything not of one’s own ethnotribe, and well-meaning anti-racists who correctly condemn racism but who incorrectly insist on using Jews as the primary example of victims of racism. This hides the position that truly threatens Jewish power: that Jews should be opposed precisely because they themselves are among the most committed racists in the world, and that the anti-Zionist movement must therefore associate itself not with racism but with honest anti-racism.
(If ever accused of racism against Jews during your anti-Zionist activism, never forget to point out that it was not we but Jews themselves who introduced the racial identity of ”Jewishness” into the discussion to begin with. In other words, it was never we who intended to keep us separate from them, but they who ever insist on keeping themselves separate from us. Therefore it is not we but they who are the racists. In all cases, the racist side is the side which drew the line of ethnic apartheid in the first place. Jewish use of the term “anti-Semite” rather than ”anti-Jewish” is an attempt to camouflage this. Our best way to intercept is by enthusiasm on our part to accept non-Jewish Semitic-speaking peoples into our folk.)
“Judeo-Christianity” vs “Islam”
Geert Wilders (Jew), professional liar
This has produced a wrongheaded debate between four(!) sides:
i) ZC Judeo-Christians who believe Muslims are the enemy and that Jews are on their side
ii) BS Muslims who believe that both Jews and Christians are enemies
iii) BS Judeo-Christians who believe that both Jews and Muslims are enemies
iv) well-meaning nonreligious anti-Zionists who believe that Christianity and Mohammedanism must first be completely abandoned in order to effectively oppose Jewish domination
thereby hiding the true position that threatens Jewish power: that Jesus and Mohammed – both of whom were murdered for fighting against Jewry - would have been best friends and perfect teammates had they lived in the same era, and that a genuinely united Christian-Mohammedan force today (hopefully under the prophesized joint leadership of the Second Christ and the Mahdi) could defeat Zionism with ease.
“In the long run they all swallow the same hash, even though it be dished up with different spices. In both cases the cook is one and the same – the Jew.” – Adolf Hitler
However, the deeper false dichotomies rely not on the relatively crude technique of verbal misassociation, but on a more advanced technique of verbal misdirection. This consists of choosing terms which together encourage movement within the topic inside the wrong dimension altogether.
“Individualism vs Collectivism”
Alisa Rosenbaum Ayn Rand (Jew), professional liar
By setting individualism and collectivism in apparent opposition, we are led to forget that both individualism and collectivism are manifestations of indulgence, and hence to fail to see that it is upon indulgence that Zionism thrives. An individual who desires survival or power or glory or any other indulgence for himself is structurally no different than an entire civilization that desires the same for itself, and a society composed of individually non-indulgent people can be indulgent as a whole – and be similarly manipulated. The true dichotomy is not Individualism vs Collectivism, but Indulgence vs Service. Only those persons or civilizations whose mindset is based on serving a non-self-referential purpose (ie. Aryan individuals and Aryan folkdom) are able to leave the Goy Wheel. In presenting us a choice between two types of indulgence, our enemies hope that we may forget the idea of service altogether, and thus stay on the Goy Wheel forever.
This is the Zionist pre-emptive defence against critical thinking, which is solely capable of scrutinizing the validity or invalidity of what has already been presented. (Critical thinkers thus become the most effective useful idiots, as they make the discussion sound intelligent while actually keeping it where the Zionists want it.) This technique is only overcome by lateral thinking that is willing to consider what has not been brought up.
But don’t worry about the words used to formulate those assumptions, arguments and conclusions. Otherwise you might see the Jewish lie, and we don’t want that to happen, do we?
For instance, consider a Zionist agent saying: “X is better than Y because of Reasons 1, 2 and 3.” (They do this all the time with various Xs and Ys, such as “black” people and “white” people, “homosexuals” and “heterosexuals”, big government and small government, etc.) There are three possible types of response.
The uncritical thinker’s response is to accept that X is better than Y. Thus he is being herded, as it is perfectly possible for Jews to anticipate and prepare for this outcome.
The critical thinker’s response is to examine the validity of Reasons 1, 2 and 3. If he finds that Reasons 1, 2 and 3 are invalid, he will reject that X is better than Y, and may even start believing that Y is actually better than X. Thus he is still being herded, albeit by reverse-bluff, because it is also perfectly possible for Jews to anticipate and prepare for this outcome.
The lateral thinker’s response, on the other hand, is to ask: “Why are we even comparing X and Y? Why don’t we compare _____ and _____ instead?” The lateral thinker rejects the entire X-Y paradigm, and it is impossible for Jews to anticipate (let alone prepare for) what _____ and _____ might be. Thus only lateral thinking is anti-Zionist thinking.
Now you have a chance to break free.
The Poison Needle
“I fear for this world I have found – for fields such as this with their sights and sounds brought by their smallness bounded only by hedge and tree. For there is noise, around, encroaching; human-made, machine, noise; there is development, around, encroaching, destroying the life that is this life, this being, this living and this peace. And there is thus even more sadness, within me, because of such things.” – David Myatt
To get people to see that they are being herded, they have to be taught how herding works. But once they know how herding works, they can now use this knowledge to herd others. This is the contagion that lies at the bottom of the Jewish lie: those who unravel it are now eminently equipped to become the new liars. Already we see this among the more cunning organized Gentile leaders who have learned to lie like Jews, with the added advantage that they can sell themselves as enemies of Jews in order to gain the credibility that Jews are currently losing.
David Duke (Gentile) and Kevin MacDonald (Gentile), professional liars whom Zionists deliberately make to appear credible by pretending to try to censor them. Either that or they delete their own videos to falsely claim that they were censored by Zionists, and then put the videos back up later and claim victory against Zionist censorship…..
The Gentile lie that has done by far the most damage to anti-Zionism is the assertion that all ethnic groups behave tribally, in order to persuade its intended audience to behave tribally also. For example, one of the most common – and unfortunately most widely believed - forms of this lie claims that people from wealthy non-Western countries are wholly unmoved by poverty in “Third World” countries and would never set up charity organizations solely devoted to helping ethnic outsiders, which is of course untrue.
External link: Amitofo Care Centre
This lie is, however, easily believed by Boromir Syndrome (BS) infectees: recall that the more Boromir wanted the Ring for himself, the more vividly it appeared to him that everyone else wanted the Ring for themselves. It damages anti-Zionism because it negates disgust towards Jewish tribal behaviour by claiming that such behaviour is actually ordinary, in its place encouraging disgust towards those who refuse to behave in this way by calling them “race traitors”. (Here we see a crude Gentile attempt to manipulate words, for how can one be a “traitor” to an identity that one never chose in the first place?) The end result is total replacement of the heroic motivation to oppose Jewish tribal interests with the cowardly motivation to look after one’s own tribal interests.
If you let it get on you, you will then start smearing it on others. So don’t.
At the heart of the Aryanist movement has always been the struggle to ensure that the fall of one evil is not replaced by the rise of another: that capitalism is not replaced by communism, that debt-based currency is not replaced by metal-based currency, that corrupted religion is not replaced by nonreligion, and that Jewish power is not replaced by Gentile power. It is possible that our victory will not come until Gentiles have become so adept at lying that it no longer makes sense to distinguish – semantically or even intuitively - between Aryans, Gentiles and Jews, but only between Aryans and non-Aryans. In that event, the struggle will at last be fully revealed on our terms, thereby heralding the time for the ultimate return of the Age of Truth.