“Selfishness is manifested in many different ways. It can find expression in that mere lust for personal enjoyment, which characterises the shameless voluptuary; or in the miser’s insatiable greed for gold; or in the individual ambition of the seeker of honours and position; or in the family ambition of the man who is ready to sacrifice every interest in the world to the welfare and happiness of his wife and children. But it can also be brought out in the exaltation of a man’s tribe or country above all others … just because it happens to be the tribe or country of that particular man. … Men “in Time” only know what is “their own” and what is not.” – Savitri Devi

Few individuals live up to the ideal of universal compassion, but at least the ideal itself used to be largely admirable. A clear sign of collapsing civilization and descent to barbarism is when tribalism is not only practiced (as it has always been by the vast majority), but actually promoted by reactionary movements as more admirable than universalism.

Judaism has always preached tribalism against non-Jews, leaving us no honest option but to consider Jews as barbarians. And all humanist (ie. Jewish and Gentile) philosophies have preached tribalism against non-humans, so that humans in general too can only be considered as barbarians. But whereas Jews tried in the past to prevent non-Jews from reading the Talmud, fearing non-Jews would find the content abhorrent, today more and more Gentiles are reading the Talmud and thinking: “Clever! We need something like this for our own people!” Whereas past humanists admitted their callousness compared to universalists, the present trend is for universalists (or even anti-racist humanists) to be ridiculed as oversensitive “bleeding hearts”.

Jews for their part are all too happy to encourage the rise of Gentile tribes. The more non-Jews openly and shamelessly behave as Jews themselves behave, the more difficult it becomes for us to criticize Jewish tribalism as a specifically Jewish phenomenon.

Thus it is crucial that tribalism, including but not limited to racism, be put back in its place as the attitude of barbarians (ie. Jews and Gentiles) if revolution is to be positive. This is the foremost spiritual challenge of our time, and of our movement in particular: to defend and promote universalism more strongly than ever even as our barbaric enemies attempt to remove it from social consciousness.

Jewish tribal manual

Gentile tribal manuals

Ignoble Altruism

“Through ignorance, passion and hatred, decisions are taken which, in their injustice and lack of logic, contain the seeds of fresh conflicts.” – Adolf Hitler

The argument in favour of tribalism proposes that the practical function of altruism (and hence the reason it naturally evolved) is to enable cooperation, which results in a cooperating in-group gaining survival advantages over a non-cooperating out-group. It follows that any altruism involving no out-group at all is unnatural, and betrays the very gainfulness of altruism. In order to upkeep this gainfulness, the tribalists tell us, some group must fill the role of Goy.

The unhesitating Aryan reaction to such a thesis is that we refuse to be slaves to Nature, therefore merely knowing that tribalism is a product of natural selection does not give it moral validity in our eyes, but only stresses the need for National Socialism to replace natural selection as the primary evolutionary mechanism. We are not Jews or Gentiles; we will never accept ignoble fitness.

Tribalism, when it occurs among a smaller in-group, is known and despised as nepotism. It does not become less despicable when practiced by a larger in-group, regardless of Jews and Gentiles who describe it as “assertion of group interests” as if that makes it sound better. (We encourage use of the term ethnonepotism when concise clarification on the meaning of racism is demanded, usually by ZC or BS types.)

Tribalists living among universalists in a society will indeed end up in all the positions of control, as they will ensure that every such position acquired by a member of their own tribe never leaves the hands of the tribe thereafter. Of course such a situation cannot and should not be tolerated. But does this mean that therefore everyone else should also form tribes and see who is best at being tribal? No, it means that the universalists need to identify the tribalists and get rid of them. This is the true message of National Socialism: that tribalism is an inferior mode of behaviour, and its adherents inferior people, not to be imitated but to be thoroughly removed from society by all countries who wish to cultivate nobility of blood.

“German history is not rich in great statesmen. But where one has appeared, he mostly had something to say and give not only to his own people, but to the world.” – Joseph Goebbels

Imagine how ridiculous it would be if Jesus instructed his disciples to become money-changers in order to compete with the Jewish money-changers at usury and hopefully outperform them. He did not do so. He stormed the temple with a whip and drove the money-changers out.

Aryans need no manual for universalism; it is in our blood.

The Big Lie

“They should have recognized and followed the profound truth that the lack of the necessities of life has always been a source of conflict between peoples.” – Adolf Hitler

A key lie concering tribalism told by present-day ethnonationalists, who are just tribalists seeking respectability (note that National Socialists are not ethnonationalists, but folkists), is: “We can be for our own people without being against other people.” In a world of finite resources, it should be obvious why this is absolutely impossible.

The present-day ethnonationalists would have us believe that geographical separatism is the answer. Yet their stance on foreign policy after separation is to make decisions based on ”what is good for our own people”. So what happens when resources become insufficient? Proceeding logically from their stance, they will plunder what they need from whomever they can overpower, because they have already defined their own people as automatically more important than their Goy victims. To see ethnonationalist foreign policy in action, we need look no further than Israeli treatment of Palestinians, or the words of Yaacov Perrin (Jew): “One million Arabs are not worth one Jewish fingernail.”

“We’re doing what’s good for Israel! What’s the problem?”

External link: Raid Gaza

It would be delusional to believe that only Jews are capable of such attitudes, as history is replete with non-Jews behaving in exactly the same way. The oppression of Native American, African and Australasian societies by Anglo and other colonial settlers was no less brutal than that of the Palestinians by Israeli settlers, while the worst massacres committed by Jews against the Ukrainians and the Armenians or the worst tortures masterminded by Jews in communist gulags cannot begin to compare in scale or cruelty with the daily routines of abbatoirs, dairy/egg/fur/silk factories and vivisection labs worldwide, all economically supported by ordinary humans.

The only reliable way to prevent one group from oppressing another in a world of finite resources is if every group agrees to decrease its own population so as to reduce its demand for resources faster than the rate at which resources are running out. All groups which refuse to enter into such an agreement are implicit tribes, and must be treated as such. Mere absence of a deliberate plan to oppress others in the process of collective self-preservation is not good enough. As long as collective self-preservation is valued as an end in itself – which is the essence of tribalism - rather than purely as the means to a noble purpose, a group will end up oppressing others sooner or later, whether it planned to do so or not. So now when a Jew or Gentile asks ”What is so bad about just wanting to survive?” in response to their disgusting behaviour, you know how to answer them.

Opposition to tribalism is not apathetic pacifism. We understand that conflict is likely in the near future; our concern is that the conflict involves morally meaningful sides rather than a bunch of tribes all fighting for the same thing and for the same reason, namely for their own tribe because it is their own tribe. We recommend that the universalists (Aryans) of every ethnicity, religion and location oppose the tribalists – all tribalists, Gentiles as well as Jews – within all our denominations. While universalists may be outnumbered by tribalists in each separate denomination, we can unite as a folk across denominations in a way that tribalists (by definition) cannot, and as such are not nearly as powerless as we may seem.

Noble Compassion

“Final solution can be effected only by means of a warm-hearted resolve on the part of those who once faced each other as opponents, but whose mutual esteem, based on a recognition of each other’s bravery, could become a bridge leading to the future – a future which must never see any repetition of past sufferings.” – Adolf Hitler

We promote not universal altruism, but universal compassion.

Fundamentally, altruism views others as assets from which additional gain can be derived, be it increasing one’s own gain at their expense (the zero-sum game, played with Goys) or increasing collective gain even at individual expense (the non-zero sum game, played with collaborators). Thus underneath all altruism - including supposedly universal altruism - is nothing more than greed. Compassion, on the other hand, views everyone as slaves to the game itself, regardless of whether they are gaining or losing. Compassion does not, therefore, attempt to help anyone increase their gain (which ultimately further increases their thrall by the game), but instead attempts to provide an alternative to the game in its entirety.

When Jesus threw out the money-changers, he was not trying to give everyone else a better chance to become wealthy. Those who do not fully understand this cannot possibly be ready to face our enemies.