“When human hearts break and human souls despair, then from the twilight of the past, the great conquerors of distress and care, of shame and misery, of spiritual slavery and physical compulsion, look down and hold out their eternal hands to the despairing mortals. Woe to the people ashamed to grasp them!” – Adolf Hitler
At the heart of the Aryanist worldview is the axiom that all the gene pools not only in the present day but indeed throughout recorded history are heavily degraded, and that it is the natural tendency for such degradation to further increase over time, due to natural selection consistently eliminating the noble in favour of the ignoble. It follows that, tracing backwards in time, the noble traits that historically have appeared only rarely in individual cases might well have been the norm of at least one prehistoric root race, which we call the Aryan race. Biologically, the arising of such a race could be accounted to an accident of genetic mutations occurring in a window of favourable environmental conditions which did not last (but which authentic National Socialism aims to re-create). Teleologically, what other purpose could there be for a race whose nobility leads them to have no attachment to the material world in which they have arisen, if not to help the rest of living creation transcend it also? In Hitler’s words: “There have been human beings, in the baboon category, for at least three hundred thousand years. There is less distance between the man-ape and the ordinary modern man than there is between the ordinary modern man and a man like Schopenhauer.”
Green – Neolithic farms; Blue – early civilizations
Archetypes of Prehistoric Man
“Our ancestors were all peasants. There were no hunters amongst them — hunters are only degenerate peasants.” – Adolf Hitler
Prior to complex economic civilization that permits a multitude of superimposable survival strategies within a single society, humans lived for perhaps hundreds of millenia in small groups in the wild, where natural selection (including sexual selection) eliminated people mainly according to their failure to obtain food and failure to defend themselves against attackers. Consequently, the prehistoric root races and their archetypes - whose influences continue to be perceptible even in the present day - were created according to the distinct lifestyles of that epoch.
The oldest human lifestyles are gathering and hunting, a direct continuation from the lifestyles of pre-human apes. However, whereas human gathering techniques were not significantly different than ape (e.g. gorilla) gathering techniques, human hunting techniques were much more advanced than ape (e.g. chimpanzee) hunting techniques, such as involving use of sharpened weapons and even ranged weapons. Thus the hunter archetype dominated throughout the Paleolithic era, especially in the colder climates outside of Africa where gathering alone was generally inadequate to supply enough food. It is expressed in honest tribalists who prefer to use overt violence to subdue their victims. We consider this the most common archetype among historical and modern humans, and call them Gentiles (root “gentilis” meaning “of a tribe”), or more casually barbarians, heathens and other similar terms connoting primitivity. As Savitri Devi notes: “It shows at the very origin of society a tremendous gregarious selfishness, connected with sex, and soon expanded from the family to the tribe and to the species, but never beyond.”
Later, during the Epipaleolithic or Mesolithic era, some populations developed a lifestyle of herding, which was much more energy-efficient than hunting. Accompanying changes in selective pressure created a herder archetype. It is expressed in dishonest tribalists who prefer to use mostly deception and manipulation - including pretending to be universalists when it suits their interests - to subdue their victims. We consider a significant and disproportionately influential minority of historical and modern humans to belong to this archetype, and call them Jews (root “Yah-udeh” meaning “praise Yahweh”), although the term ”Israelite” is more accurate when referring to the tribe predating Moses, and the term “Turanian” when referring to the tribe predating Jacob. As Alfred Rosenberg notes: “Jewish legends begin with stories about cattle raising.”
Mutations for nobility might have occurred many times in individuals among hunter or herder populations. However, they would have been quickly terminated by natural selection each time they occurred, being maladaptive to the lifestyle of the population. Only when a new lifestyle of farming was first developed by some populations at the beginning of the Neolithic era were conditions anomalously suitable for such traits to thrive and form a new farmer archetype. It is expressed in honest universalists unwilling to victimize others for their own benefit. These were the original Aryans (root “ar-ya” meaning “soil tiller”), the first bearers of the swastika. Jews refer to Aryans as “Amalek”, meaning “valley dweller”, consistent with early farm settlements being based around river basins and with Hitler’s own appraisal: “Wherever good-quality land is to be found, there one also finds the best type of peasant.”
However, in the ensuing spread of farming technology to non-Aryans (and with the transformation of originally non-arable land into arable land via increasingly advanced methods of irrigation and fertilization), their naturally prolific races rapidly multiplied in number as carrying capacity rose with food supply (also increased by the spread of herding in many cases), and mixed with the Aryans who had originally brought them farming. Very soon, the Aryan bloodlines became absorbed into the large populations and ceased to exist as a race.
Aryan Strands in History
“If one wished to describe the history of the Aryans, he would have to admit that today the Aryan has vanished except for a few very small traces.” – Alfred Rosenberg
In order for a root race to form, the entire society must be engaged in the same lifestyle so that the entire gene pool is being selected for the same heritable traits. This has not been the case since the beginning of recorded history, due to the wide variety of occupations available in complex economic society (especially after the appearance of cities and money), such that newly mutated heritable traits maladaptive to one occupation could easily be adaptive to another, leading to many concurrent, overlapping survival strategies in the same society. And because people generally do not reproduce strictly within their occupation (not even in societies with caste systems), the traits mix often, so that instead of evolutionary drift in a single direction, we have had evolutionary sprawl in no particular direction. Thus no new root race has been able to form throughout history; instead historical cultures have been formed mostly by struggle between the conflicting traits of the old root races and their respective influences on society. Hence we speak of historical (and present-day) individuals as having predominantly Gentile, Jewish or Aryan blood memory, or no blood memory at all, whereupon we call them raceless – people who go along with whatever mode of behaviour is considered “normal” at any given time, as Hitler describes: “The broad masses, which constitute what I have called the middle section, come forward and make their influence felt only when the … extreme sections are engaged in mutual strife. In case one of the extreme sections comes out victorious the middle section will readily submit to its domination.” The question, therefore, is where we might try to find Aryan blood memory and its influences.
Some theories (favoured by Alfred Rosenberg) posit that degraded but discernible Aryan genetics continued for a time in the hereditary ruling classes of early historical dynasties, which would account for them being on the whole better than the masses they ruled (hence the term “aristocracy”), though still far from the Golden Age ideal with the exception of a few individuals. Ruling classes were generally more conscious of breeding than the masses when it came to mate selection, but this does not imply that they chose according to Aryan standards, and even if they did, this does not imply that ideal choices were always available.
Other theories (favoured by Joseph Goebbels) posit that Aryan genetic continuities in the ancient world might have persisted among the most rural and isolated peasant farming communities, where – in contrast to metropolitan environments - daily life and hence selective pressure were least affected by the increasingly complexifying economy. But records are lacking that refer to especially noble peasant cultures, partly because records rarely focus on rural life in the first place, and partly because the vast majority of rural communities would still have been non-Aryan even if such theories were true.
Geographically, it has been speculated that populations living near river valleys may have marginally more Aryan blood than those living deeper inland, on the grounds that inland migration was driven by population expansion in excess of the carrying capacity of the original riverside settlements. Hitler had this to say: “I changed my ideas on how to interpret our mythology the day I went for a walk in the forests where tradition invites us to lay the scene for it. In these forests one meets only idiots, whilst all around, on the plain of the Rhine, one meets the finest specimens of humanity.”
Aryan individuals might also have been more likely than average to be drawn towards esoteric monastic orders of antiquity which both actively selected for aspects of nobility among its membership and offered an alternative environment to the degenerate mainstream civilization. (Serious NSDAP research into such orders around the world has, however, been distorted by Zionist historians to portray it as a party fascinated with occultism.) Such orders tended to promote celibacy, and therefore would have functioned as focused exit points of Aryan genetics, even as they produced cultural influence. This does not imply that absence of such orders would have significantly increased the Aryan demographic, however, as it is not religion but innate nobility that causes Aryans to be far less prolific than non-Aryans.
“The Jew offers the most striking contrast to the Aryan. There is probably no other people in the world who have so developed the instinct of self-preservation as the so-called ‘chosen’ people. The best proof of this statement is found in the simple fact that this race still exists.” – Adolf Hitler
“Slim and slender, fast as a greyhound, tough as leather and hard as Krupp steel.” – Adolf Hitler
The Aryan lifestyle was settled (as opposed to nomadic), with similar stamina-based physical labour for both men and women, cereal-based diet and long-term food storage. Physical attributes maladaptive to more primitive lifestyles but adaptive to this lifestyle include high metabolism, slow maturation and low sexual dimorphism. Particular heritable traits statistically correlate with these attributes and with each other (as well as being anecdotally associated with high spiritual quality by ancient historians and physiognomists), and hence are theoretically plausible Aryan traits, many of which were also tentatively proposed in National Socialist Germany. Examples include high facial angle, high digit ratio, leptoprosopy, skeletal gracility, ectomorphy, lactose intolerance, blood type A1. Note that none of these traits are ethnicity-specific, but arise in groups of all colours and locations.
In myth, the Aryan race was supposed to possess great physical beauty reflecting their noble character. This is easy to understand once we consider that more idealistic people are less likely to accept sexual partners who fall short of their aesthetic ideals, but that such idealism only works when an entire population practices it.
“You will display to the world what has long been obvious to you, and what you have expressed in past years, often unconsciously.” – Rudolf Hess
The Aryan race is associated with the introduction of asceticism to civilization. While religion existed among both Jews and Gentiles, both types used it solely to derive worldly benefits. Only the arrival of Aryan thinking changed the focus of religion to pursuit of transcendent spiritual ideals. This is reflected in many prehistoric customs even before formalization into religious systems, alongside a general aesthetic tendency towards simplicity and austerity rather than complexity and opulence.
Instead of burying or attempting to preserve their dead and enshrining their tombs, Aryans often burned our dead and scattered the ashes. Instead of the otherwise ubiquitous fertility goddess, Aryans conceived of a virgin goddess, and honoured chastity (both male and female) not merely prior to marriage but as an admirable path in its own right. Instead of viewing humanity as distinct from the rest of the living world, Aryans saw fundamental unity of all creatures under the sun, a sentiment implicit in the symbolism of the swastika, and developed a personal bond with cows in particular as our longtime ploughing companions.
It is notable that Aryan culture has since been consistently misinterpreted by non-Aryans as ‘unwholesome’. Preference for cremation was frequently considered by its critics as a desire to desecrate the dead. (Meanwhile, Jews readily burn their Goy sacrifices, yet forbid the burning of Jewish corpses.) Practice of chastity has long led to suspicion of sexual perversion. Veneration of cattle has long been derided as superstitious, and wider concern for animal welfare as oversensitive. And to this day the swastika is still believed by the ignorant to be a symbol of racism.
“Whatever it was, I felt and acted quite differently from all the other young men of my age that I knew, some of whom, no doubt, considered me elitist and somewhat condescending.” – David Myatt
“They work. They wait. They live. They are, in this darkening Dark Age, the irreducible element ‘against Time’. … Its members are dispersed all over the earth. But this young faith ‘against Time’, the Hitler faith … is the link between them, wherever they be.” – Savitri Devi
In all historical civilizations there have been outlying individuals - so-called “self-haters” – who morally despised the traditional cultures into which we were born. Nor do we see prospects of these cultures improving over time, but are convinced that they were fallen from the outset, and that the further they ‘advance’ along this fallen path, the worse they will become. Such individuals often turn romantically to the distant past, convinced that the only salvation lies in abandoning the present order, returning to the beginning and choosing a different, more noble path. In the words of Miguel Serrano: “By saying ‘Aryan race’, we say it all. Because this term is esoteric, referring to an initiation that permits men to be born anew, for the second time.”
Such individuals, who may differ in ethnicity, language, religion and other aspects of background, and who may or may not display the physical attributes mentioned above, are yet bound together by a common collective memory. We ask these individuals from all over the world to take this chance to reunite and realize our shared vision. We ask you – if you are one of us – to accept your inheritance and join our movement of UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY in the struggle for a better world.
Do you have Aryan blood memory? If so, contact us and join our movement!
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 1)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 2)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 3)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 4)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 5)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 6)
- Aryan Diffusion (Part 7)
- Aryan Diffusion (Roundup)