http://www.scotsman.com/news/environment/scots_families_should_stop_at_two_children_1_1940527

Let us hope as Scotland moves towards its bid for independence, it can become increasingly assertive in ideas for society. If it is ever to become a pace-setter in Europe, it must start acting like one. Therefore while I applaud bringing up population control at all, Scots need to gradually adopt a much more confident tone with regard to such initiatives.

At present, everyone who brings up state control of reproduction is using China as the limit and timidly discussing where the middle ground should be between China’s one-child policy and the rest of the world’s lack of any policy at all. I suggest, however, that we will see no breakthrough until one country is prepared to be the first to say that the Chinese policy is not good enough, and that it can do much better. While I would be happy for any country anywhere in the world to take this long-awaited step (or even if China decides to upgrade all by itself!), I would be particularly happy if a post-independence Scotland could be the first, as it would highlight (as National Socialist Germany once highlighted) state control over population and demographics as a inextricable component of true economic and political self-determination. A state with control over every other aspect of its society except reproduction is like a driver with control over every switch inside his car except the brakes.

For now, Aryanists in Scotland must at least vigorously defend the idea that a population policy is a good thing, and that Scotland should take this great chance to lead such a development rather than merely follow it later. Scotland has only limited farmland, therefore if it wishes to not be dependent on imported food (and yes, the day may well come when food is worth more than oil or metals), it seriously needs to get its population down to less than what its own land can support.

http://aryanism.net/blog/information/zc-list/

This began as a list that I started compiling some time ago for my own reference. But since a number of you had been sending me emails or contact forms to the effect of “Hey! Do you know about this guy pushing ZC?”, I thought it would be best to have a master list available in public so that we can compare notes and pool awareness more efficiently.

For now I’ve added Jews only, but I will be adding Gentiles soon, so please check back. I will also over time be adding short notes on the individuals, such as the names of the sites/groups they are associated with, and even examples of their propaganda. Everyone is more than welcome to suggest additions to this page at any time.

Later on I will also be putting up a BS List, so any suggestions relating to that would be welcome too.

Apparently it is not enough for Jews that Gaddafi has been killed; even the dignified image of him must be defiled. By now I think we are all sick of watching the Jewish-owned media play over and over again footage of Gaddafi being beaten to death and of useful idiots taking pictures of his naked corpse. These cynical images are the images Jews want us to recall every time we think of Gaddafi. They want to emphasize his mortality and humiliation, thereby stripping him of the aura that accompanies all true (ie. non-democratic) leaders. They push the modern view that all such leaders are merely ordinary humans who became too powerful for their own good, rather than the view of antiquity that true leaders are something more than human, outstanding individuals in touch with and guided by higher powers inaccessible to the masses. In their media treatment of Gaddafi and in the rest of their pro-democracy propaganda, Jews betray their own age-old fear of the Caesarian archetype, which is second only to their fear of the Christic archetype. In our comparison of Jews to vampires, Caesar is the stake, and Christ is the sunlight. These – a leader that motivationally trumps Jewish control (Caesar) and an ideology that morally trumps Judaism (Christ) – are the only two weapons a vampire fears.

Hitler had the foresight to commit suicide and be cremated, leaving no remains for his enemies to find and thereby keeping his image safe from Jewish defilement. Gaddafi failed in this respect, but this does not mean we have to remember Gaddafi how Jews would like us to. We can choose to remember him any way we want. Here is how I will be remembering him, and how I hope all Aryanists and anti-Zionists can remember him also:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv1uoXFId4g

It is said that when Caesar and Christ appear in the same person, Zionism will be defeated. I assure you we are working on this behind the scenes. In the meantime, an international boycott of Swiss products as a statement against the Zionist SVP remains as applicable today as when Gaddafi called for it back in 2010. The SVP has already found itself weakened in the recent Swiss elections, so a further boycott at this timing could really hammer them:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/24/switzerland-right-wing-anti-immigration-svp

And if this boycott could be rallied as a Gaddafi Memorial Boycott, that would be the strongest statement of contempt we can send to our enemies regarding  their latest propaganda. Start spreading the meme now!

OK, EruptingLight is still missing, so I’ll have to keep covering the secession front myself. Fortunately, Scotland is one of the topics which is almost pleasant to blog about. At a time when we hear almost nothing but bad news from everywhere else, Scotland manages to come up with positive after positive. 

Independence:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-LeBobQIhA

Wind power:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBKcWPvS2K8

World Porridge Day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6JW5A1lY7w 

Social services:

Scotland vs England: subsidies and benefits

Old people

• Scotland: Free personal care for all residents of nursing homes.
• England: Proposal that anyone with assets worth £35,000 should pay all the costs of their care.  

University tuition fees

• Scotland: Free – to Scottish students. Holyrood abolished £1,000-per-year tuition fees.
• England: Students pay tuition and top-up fees of up to £9,000 a year – and English students at Scottish universities are charged £1,800 for tuition.  

Education maintenance allowances

• Scotland: Up to £30 a week
• England: £0

Prescription charges

• Scotland: Prescription drugs free for the chronically ill from next April. Expected to be free for everyone within four years.
• England: £6.85 per item

Health checks

• Scotland: Free dental checks and free eye tests for all.
• England: Standard charge of £17 for dental check-ups; eye tests cost £18.85.  

Transport

• Scotland: Over-60s travel free on buses; 16- to 18-year-olds get a third off.
• England: Off-peak journeys free for over-60s and schoolchildren.  

Heating for elderly

• Scotland: Central heating installed for all pensioners
•  England: Grants available for those on pension credits.  

School dinners

• Scotland: Free in the first three years of primary school.
• England: Poorer children qualify for free meals – but this applies to only 16 per cent of pupils.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/westminster-has-no-answer-to-the-alex-salmond-effect-2371370.html

And this is right now, when Scotland is still chained to Britain (so that a huge chunk of Scottish taxes actually funds English social services). Imagine what awaits if Scotland actually becomes independent. I truly believe that Scotland has a chance – if we can infuse it with the will - to be an anti-ZC leader to rally the better people to its side and counterbalance the growing ZC tumours in the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Austria.

Besides the obvious allies of Wales and Ireland, the recent election results in Denmark hearteningly indicate that the ZC grip (leveraged by the Zionist DPP)  is far from irreversible. An independent Scotland should seek political alliance with Denmark, a fellow oil exporter. To pave the way for this, all Aryanists and other anti-Zionists in Denmark must try to come up with imaginative cultural propositions that have the effect of reducing Danish dependence on foreign trade (ending the ridiculous annual handout to the Faroe Islands would be a decent start), and also keep hammering the DPP, as well as constantly pointing to Scotland as one of the few positive examples we need more of.

Again, we are all the time in need of new contacts in order to expand our influence, so if you have been following us for a while and yet have still not volunteered for activism, please do so soon!

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

First of all, please try to stay on topic in the comments. The last post was about Kashmir, so please discuss Kashmir (or at least other secessionist possibilities) there. Including a request about another topic is fine, but please do not ignore the supposed main topic of the post in order to do so.

If you want to talk about Occupy Wall Street, please do so underneath THIS post.

Also, Miecz suggested a new delegation:

http://goldinthefurnace.blogspot.com/2011/10/report-on-occupy-protests.html

We all already know that leaderless protests of this kind are not only chaotic, but become a venue for the enemy to further spread the ideas (and even controlled opposition leaders) they want the protestors to follow. We should be paying attention to which public figures are trying to appear sympathetic to the protestors, and considering their motives.

The most frustrating thing about these protests is that the protestors, with their “We the 99%” rhetoric, are implicitly drawing the lines of opposition as Capitalism vs Democracy, and asking for the government to come to their support against Wall Street, which of course is nonsense. If we want to at least get the protestors roughly on track, our priority should be pointing out that democracy places power in the hands of the rich, who (by funding campaigns, lobbies and owning media) influences the outcome of virtually all democratic politics. Never mind the old slogan: “Fighting communism with democracy is like trying to stab a villain who is shooting at you.” We need to promote a new slogan: “Fighting capitalism with democracy is like asking the villain to sell you the bullet you need to shoot him with.” It’s just not going to happen. The only way to change anything is by making bullets yourself.

And this goes back to something we’ve been promoting for a long time, namely switching over to an alternative economy. If all the thousands of Occupy Wall Street protestors were willing to become a folk and barter with each other for basic products and services, they could begin to drop out of the system instead of just complaining about it. So what should be happening is Miecz, rockstar, etc. getting down there and putting on a mailing list anyone who would support a citywide barter network. It shouldn’t be Occupy Wall Street, it should be Cut Out Wall Street! This is how National Socialism begins.

If all the unemployed people in New York could eventually start something like this, and trade exclusively with each other, then we’re all set:

http://www.technologyforthepoor.com/UrbanAgriculture/Garden.htm

“A solid stock of small and medium farmers has at all times been the best protection which a nation could have against the social diseases that are prevalent to-day. Moreover, that is the only solution which guarantees the daily bread of a nation within the framework of its domestic national economy. With this condition once guaranteed, industry and commerce would retire from the unhealthy position of foremost importance which they hold to-day and would take their due place within the general scheme of national economy, adjusting the balance between demand and supply. Thus industry and commerce would no longer constitute the basis of the national subsistence, but would be auxiliary institutions.” – Adolf Hitler

At the very least the Occupy Wall Street protests need to be turned at once into a mass movement to boycott all big businesses and doing as much of their shopping from small businesses only, and then figuring it out from there:

http://aryanism.net/about/boycott/

(One last thing: there are other groups advocating a parallel economy, but their idea is based on going back to the gold standard. Expose them as the Zionist agents they are.)

OK, now we start getting into the really messy ones. I’m currently very busy with other stuff, so this time I’ll let you guys discuss it yourselves. EruptingLight, if you are around, please lead the discussion since this is your field now. If you would like to take the discussion over to your blog, that is fine too. Also, EruptingLight, please add the previous case of Hawaiian independence to your Secessionist Initiatives page when you can. Thank you.

First everyone study this presentation:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/south_asia/03/kashmir_future/html/7.stm

Using the given information, the principles of the primer:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/strategic-secession-primer/

 and anti-Zionist general knowledge, explain in the comments section your take on:

i) which of the hypothetical scenarios(s) Jews would like to see, and why.

ii) which of the hypothetical scenario(s) we would prefer, and why.

I hardly have to explain the wedge being driven by Zionists between India and Pakistan. Back in an older post by Elysium, Marduniya made a relevant observation on this topic on which everyone might like to refresh yourselves:

http://aryanism.net/blog/elysium/strategic-anti-zionism/

This is, in effect, a call to any Aryanists or other anti-Zionists in India or Pakistan who may be reading this. Please contact us if you are interested in helping out.

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

(The guy called noblesoul88 on Aryan Front who is in India may be useful for this project. Can someone over there (Makela?) please ask him to contact us and see if he can get something set up?)

The English translation of Miguel Serrano’s book Adolf Hitler: the Ultimate Avatar is complete! Let us all congratulate OC on accomplishing what he set out to accomplish, and in such a short time! This much-awaited work can now be bought here in either paperback or PDF format:

This was a massive project that I have followed from its outset. Every few months OC would email me an updated version, along with his commentary on how his quest was going. Translation is lonely work that requires dedication to see through, and OC sets an example to us all as to what we could achieve together if each of us simply focused on our strengths and did the work which we know needs to be done for the progression of our movement.

The most updated preview of the book is available here:

http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/UltAvatarEnglishTranslationPDF10.pdf

OC warned me that Serrano, writing for a primarily South American readership, included in his book a lot of material that would probably mean little to readers in other parts of the world. Thus OC decided in the English translation to omit such sections where possible. The more general point regarding Serrano’s writing style is the heavy use of metaphor, which can be misleading if taken at face value. I think OC did very well in preserving Serrano’s style and keeping the overall tone as serious as it was meant to be.

Let us all welcome new team member EruptingLight:

http://eruptinglight.wordpress.com/

Most of you are already familiar with him either over here or at Aryan Front. From now on he will be our main consultant for secession issues. Please send all relevant secession news/information to him.

We welcome new members to join our network at any time. Earthlings.com and Jason, I’ve spoken to both of you earlier. Please get set up soon, as we look forward to having you on our team. Anyone else who wants to to help out is welcome too:

http://aryanism.net/about/activism/

http://aryanism.net/blog/information/

I mentioned Hawaii previously, but here is a slight elaboration on why Aryanists and anti-Zionists should support Hawaiian independence. I will also use it as an example to illustrate application of the primer:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/strategic-secession-primer/

1) Does it reduce likelihood of war?

Yes. Replacing the current US troops in Hawaii with an independent Hawaiian military – which would have no reason to participate in any aggressive operations, and which nobody else could easily justify attacking – will drastically reduce likelihood of war across the Pacific. (I’m not even going to talk about the Zionist victory known as Pearl Harbor.)

2) Does it create internal unity?

Yes. Independence is the best way for the residents of Hawaii to either form into a Hawaiian folk, or move to the US if they prefer to be American. (Again I repeat we are firmly against deporting anyone from anywhere for reasons of ethnic background, and will not support secessionist initiatives that are likely to implement deportation schemes, since these can easily ignite civil war, which in turn would provide pretexts for external “peacekeeping” invasion. However, we fully support any measures taken by a future Hawaiian state to prohibit Jews resident in Hawaii from reproducing.)

3) Does it favour non-democratic government?

Yes. There is a high likelihood that the Hawaiian monarchy will be reinstated upon independence. This also means we should in particular support Hawaiian independence groups that favour such restoration. We should furthermore take the chance to influence it to be an absolute rather than constitutional monarchy.

4) Does it facilitate promotion of Aryan ideals and National Socialist policies?

Perhaps. First we need some Aryanists in Hawaii to contact us. Anyone there?

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

Three out of four is not bad. Therefore we support Hawaiian independence. EruptingLight, please add Hawaii to the list and keep us updated on developments!

rockstar, feel free to apply the primer to your suggestions in this way.

Finally, may I remind everyone that isn’t just a theoretical study. This is about us proactively contacting people involved in each secessionist movement and discussing our ideas WITH THEM. If you see a person who has a blog or has made a YouTube video on secession, or you see someone in a message board debate over the issue, email them in support and offer to help them. EruptingLight, I hope you can take over the management of this. For example, if you come across a Hawaii secessionist, you should think “Hey, this could be someone we can work with! Who should we send? How about rockstar?” then email rockstar telling him to contact the guy. And so on. This is what Elysium used to do all the time, and we need to get back to it.

Before we start figuring out more specific cases, let us make sure we all understand what this project is about in terms of general principles. Our aims with strategic secession are as follows:

1) To reduce the likelihood of WWIII by removing excuses for war (e.g. disputed territory) and by decentralizing military power

2) To create unity within the seceding society by giving people a common goal – independence – and thus starting the process of turning them into a folk, thereby minimizing hostility based on differences in ethnicity, religion, etc..

3) To create countries better served by non-democratic governments than by democratic governments, thereby hastening the fall of democracy (and hence control by Zionist banks and corporations) worldwide.

4) To create countries suitable to be infused with an Aryan myth (Anthony may wish to provide elaboration on this), thereby planting the seeds of Aryan culture and National Socialist government.

Therefore only secessions that advance these aims should be supported. It is obvious from inspection that some secessions would directly contradict these aims, such as by PROVIDING an excuse for war, which we therefore must be careful NOT to support. By the same token, we should generally not support secession from any state that is already non-democratic, as that would in all likelihood just hand over more territory back to the bankers.

We go with the belief that a smaller, more close-knit society is more empathic and less vulnerable to prejudice, hence more easily united. Not that larger societies cannot unite, but unity in large societies will depend heavily on the emergence of leaders of outstanding charisma (we are working on this too!). Since it is statistically unlikely that such leaders will emerge simultaneously in every country, this downsizing, localizing strategy should be considered wherever such a leader has not appeared. 

Let us develop these ideas further. EruptingLight, did you receive an email from me on this topic a few days ago? If so, I look forward to your response. If not, please let me know and I will send it again.