This is a post in response to rockstar’s request for a new post about Egypt. The last post we had about Egypt was this one by Elysium back in February, just as the Mubarak departure was happening:
http://aryanism.net/blog/elysium/on-egypt/
In June, we were contacted by the Young Egypt Party. I can’t say exactly what we discussed, but I would say that the Young Egypt Party is where all Egyptian Aryanists and anti-Zionists should gather if they want to make a difference. Unfortunately, we have not heard from them after June, therefore have no idea what they have been up to during the second half of 2011. (If Hady Elemary is reading this and would care to update us on your activism either in the comments or in private, it would be immensely appreciated.)
One possibility that has not so far been mentioned is Egypt’s geographical positioning between Israel and Libya. Libya (and its oil) has basically fallen under Zionist control, so would it not make sense for Israel to aim at eventually strengthening control over Egypt also? Consider also the timing coincidental with the attempt to start war with Syria and Iran; if this goes ahead (which would surely also draw in Hezbollah), the Zionists could easily come up with some excuse about hunting down “guerillas” hiding in Egypt and send in either NATO troops or even the IDF itself in “response”.
In such an event, a country whose own military does not get along with its own civilians would be to the invading forces’ considerable advantage. Everything currently going on in Egypt is dividing these two groups that could be working together. No matter what the outcome of the present protests, the division is succeeding.
I maintain that this will continue to be an intractable problem, both in Egypt and elsewhere, so long as protestors protest under the banner of democracy. This is because the very nature of democracy requires some administration to organize elections after the original state is overthrown, yet whatever interim administration is given enough power to organize elections is – almost by definition – given enough power to tamper with election results, and therefore open to be accused of doing so by whomever is dissatisfied with the results, whether or not any tampering has actually occurred. Looking at it this way, it should be obvious why the very desire for democracy is sufficient to cripple a country to a condition of perpetual suspicion and malcontent. (This is why the West supports democracy in Egypt. You think they really care about Egypt? All they care about is keeping it weak.)
The idea itself that democracy should have a part to play in determining the new state is the problem, and we have been saying this again and again and again. Protestors should either accept the current military government, or else they should raise their own army and take over. Anything else is systematically non-transparent and hence will eventually breed further complaints no matter how many times it is repeated.
A huge part of National Socialism is anti-democracy, yet for some reason I rarely see this aspect being emphasized by those who consider themselves National Socialists. I hope this can change. We need to be constantly bashing pro-democracy propaganda the same way we bash pro-Israel propaganda (which is hardly difficult, since often the same people (ZCs) produce both). There is no “second revolution” in Egypt; there hasn’t even been a “first revolution”. I will only start acknowledging a revolution when the revolutionaries at least openly name democracy as the system that the whole world needs to abandon.


Entries (RSS)