Comments on: Can Life Prevail?

By: Elysium

Elysium — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:30:36 +0000

This is why White Nationalism was doomed to fail from its inception. White Nationalists are afraid to do anything which has the possibility of further decreasing their perceived control over the country.

Anyhow, if WN theories are correct – that Mexicans and Muslims cannot maintain Western civilisation – than there will not be much of an environmental problem as the effects of an industrialised economy will be non-existent.

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:39:07 +0000

Determining racial growth “whereas families capable of providing a stimulating environment for children would be granted several licences” [sic] would never work. Leftist administrations–like our own and most of Europe’s–would deem it necessary to enforce affirmative action into that plan (i.e., anti-white racial quotas) when determining “stimulating environments”.

Real change would never be enacted by law in the near future anyway–with Muslims in Europe and Mexicans in America–when one sees how outnumbered (i.e., outvoted) we’ll become very shortly. Environmental destruction and rapid overpopulation, by these invaders, will get much much worse before it gets better–if at all.

By: Myrmecia

Myrmecia — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:03:42 +0000

Thank you for your reply. My reference to fascism was more of a response to the post from Julian. I have seen the term “ecofascist” used in relation to Linkola, but I think this is just sloganeering and a way of avoiding critical independent thought. “Fascism” is an emotive word and is used liberally and indiscriminately to criticise far more than is justified on the evidence. “Ecofascism” has frequently been applied by conservative populists to discredit deep ecology and even mainstream environmentalism. The term has thereby been smeared and rendered unavailable for Linkola’s position. Linkola certainly shares with fascists a contempt for democracy and a preference for strong authoritarian government – in his case to deal effectively with the emerging environmental crisis. I admire Linkola’s “will to act”. Like you I was puzzled by his apparently contradictory attitudes to nature and humanity. Sometimes he says man has priority over other animals, sometimes he condemns predatory animals – simply for being predators – acting as is their nature. Other times he writes about life as a system in which all species have emerging, active, developing roles and when he is writing along these lines Linkola looks at the biosphere through the eyes of a “deep ecologist”. I would like to hear more from you about “the will to act”.

By: Elysium

Elysium — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:20:31 +0000

I didn’t call him a Fascist. He is just known as an “Ecofascist”, probably only because of his “brutal” methods.

Regarding the Aryan qualities of Linkola, I would say that they lay in his methods: a will to act. He views the environment as a whole and not somewhat-linked issues (deforestation, species extinction, etc.) and reaches the only possible conclusion. However, his “philosophy” is not particularly Aryan as one easily notices with some comments he makes (about the drowning of cats) as well as his overt belief in the importance of man over beast.

By: Myrmecia

Myrmecia — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:54:16 +0000

I have read “Can Life Prevail?” and I don’t see in it anything Aryan and very little that could be described as fascist. The prime defining characteristic of fascism is nationalism and, although Linkola loves Finland, his affection is for Finland as a country, an ecological entity, rather than Finland as a nation, a political or cultural entity. Furthermore, Linkola does not meet other criteria for fascism: he has no place for national expansion by conquest or population growth, militarism, a mass militarized ruling party, admiration of manufacturing, technology or finance capitalism, anti-Semitism or racism. Nor does he focus criticism on feminism or communism. On the other hand he shares with fascists a organicist conception of community; yet, unlike the fascists, his view of community is not rooted in national ideology but in biophysical reality. Rather than communities being mobilised to further nationalistic goals, he sees communities operating autonomously: under broad national direction but not mobilised to contribute to national progress or aggrandisement.

By: Elysium

Elysium — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:44:37 +0000

Your question seems to be that of a troll. If you are sincere then the following is my response:

I never said that a requirement for Aryanism is to be a “pure” Caucasian.

By: julian

julian — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:59:22 +0000

hi agree with this site and about the jews now i want to ask a qestion i am white but i am not pure my father was maori/polnesian/ and my mother white is there still hope for me?