There are numerous confusions in the use of the term “Aryan”, particularly what an Aryan appearance is. Defining this with confidence will remove any confusions with interpretation of the Aryan phenotype as the same as a “White phenotype”.

In my opinion, there is not much improvement that must be made upon the theories of National Socialist Germany and other, unaffiliated, groups and individuals. Aryanist demographic policy, most importantly the policies which deal with selective breeding, should prefer those of “Nordid” phenotype. It is also my opinion that, at least initially, a wider range of “Aryans” should be included as acceptable for reproduction. However, the Nordid phenotype is, at the moment, the bearer of the most Aryan traits.

Any racial studies will have obvious negative drawbacks from difference in opinion to difference in interpretation. Identifying the phenotype that is most likely to coincide with higher prevalence of Aryan traits as well as the phenotype of the original Aryans is the main aim of any racial study on an Aryanist basis. To avoid the likely bickering over the technicalities of classification and trivialities that will not matter for the Aryanist movement but will be a concern for an Aryanist state, a range of Nordids should be considered acceptable.

For an emerging Aryanist movement, phenotype should play a role. We should understand the basics of what the desired phenotype is and analyse applicants generally with little regard to excluding periphery types. This way, contradictions which will inevitably occur from even professional classifications will not occur. A lenient classifications, with non-Nordid admixtures should be allowed as long as there are no compounding factors in either phenotype, ancestry or personal record (e.g. Jewish ancestry or criminal record).

For an Aryanist state, it would be best to prioritise research on phenotype as well as a genotype for correlations between Aryan traits and any manifestations mentally and physically. Until then, relying on internet research and the small number of studies done each year, is pointless. We do not have the resources, nor do we really require the needs, to research either Aryan phenotype or genotype.

The main traits that should be preferred are:

• Dolichocephalism
• Ectomorphism
• Defined jaw, chin and nose
• Bridged and long nose
• Relatively straight profile

Below are some of the better examples of the “Nordid” phenotype by the artist Wolfgang Willrich.

N.B. Many have interpreted this post in a way I had no intended. Phenotype should not dictate anything at all in an Aryanist society. Phenotype is merely a means to identify the groups of people with the greatest occurrence of Aryan traits. Furthermore, the Nordid phenotype is just one of many proposed phenotypes which is claimed to express the greatest degree of Aryan heritage.

Many seem to be focussing on the BNP for the upcoming elections in Britain and the party’s faults with their platform, ideology and leadership. This will be an article regarding what I believe is the unsurprising result of British culture, history and its people.

When one looks at Britain, one sees many similarities with America. Both are “exceptionalist”, in that, they believe that they are exceptions to the rules governing everything else. They both consider themselves to be great powers, as nations which will be remembered, and will continue to be great, until the end of time due to their endless contributions to humanity. And both were formed upon abstract and undefined concepts in a manner which constantly reaffirms their own morality and just-cause. After making these observations, one should note that they are all characteristics of a thoroughly Tribalist spirit.

Britain’s history should prove sufficiently that:

• Britons are an amalgamation of several racial groups, resulting in a non-Aryan populous that has been suppressed by Anglo-Saxon rulers
• Britain is spiritually deprived due to its confused soul
• Britain has only ever used its power to damage the rest of Europe

These points should force the conclusion that Britain, like it has from its inception, is a barrier to Aryandom and Aryanism itself. It will always oppose Aryanism because, to exist, it must. It has proven this time and time again. Most importantly, for Aryanists, we should not let our idealism cause us to misplace our faith and altruism in Britain’s friendship.

The British National Party, and the White Nationalism upon which it is based, is the political descendent of this bastardised country. I doubt that the BNP will be successful in anything more than increasing their votes marginally. However, the BNP is the closest Britain will ever get to Aryanism. This is no reason to support the BNP. It is the reason to ignore Britain in our political motives – Britain is lost, in fact, Aryanism never even had a hold on that “green and pleasant land”.

Regarding the BNP’s mainstream aspirations, all that needs to be said is that they wish to replace the immigrants with themselves as the sole subjects of their Jewish masters. The BNP is a “Revolt”, as defined on the glossary page. The BNP, and indeed the British people, do not care about the direction of their country, only the means of accomplishing it; for they know, their country does not have any direction beyond its self-fulfilling promises of “freedom”, “justice”, etc..

Put bluntly, Britain should not be the focus of our attentions. When the time comes, and indeed it will, Britain must simply be crushed without any illusions of possible friendship.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f8lprxiOFc&fmt=18&w=505&h=310&rel=0

Election Results

The results are as I had suspected. The British National Party took 2 seats with 6.5% in the European Elections. Interestingly, only 14 million people of a 40 million electorate voted – a sign of British fatalism regarding their power and influence over politics. This is also perhaps the main reason for the increase in the BNP’s popularity. The growing discontent and helplessness amongst the British electorate, as well as the latest scandal involing the expenses of MPs has been capitalised upon by the BNP. This boost is thus rather small and will, I suspect, be temporary. Unless the BNP receives even larger – and thus blatantly obvious – support it will not increase its popularity in the next elections.

The results can be viewed on the BBC’s website.

The results for all the countries in the 2004 and 2009 European elections can also be viewed on the BBC’s website.

The problem of scapegoating is important to how we view ourselves and our enemy and is itself detrimental to Aryanism. Scapegoating Jews, or anyone other group, is the result of a partial or complete denial of the fallibility of Gentiles. Aryanists should easily be capable of discerning between what is the result of the Jews and what is the result of ourselves.

Many of us will have experiences to draw from where scapegoating has been the cause of some obscene claims. When anti-Jewish websites attempt to write articles on certain periods of history, or certain groups from history, nearly all blame the smallest of perceived discrepancies on nothing short of total Jewish control of the subject-matter. Examples I have come across are too numerous to fully list. The most notable are claims that “Jewish banksters” caused the Dark Ages through contraction of the money supply. This is simply, again, confusion between actual Jewish power and Gentile fallibility. Some find it almost inconceivable that the world would not be perfect if the Jew no longer had any power; and, subsequently, blames any part of history that is not of sufficient quality, in whatever form and by whatever subjective means, to be thoroughly Jewish. Others that are more well-known include: the purported Jewish ancestry of nearly every historical figure; the Jewish origins of many of the modern institutions (Vatican, Banks, etc.); and the long list of perceived Jewish ideas and concepts. This is nothing more than the result of burdening the fools of the anti-Jewish movement with too much knowledge and a shortage of wisdom.

The material relationship between Jews and Aryans is one of parasitism. However, the spiritual relationship; the relationship which is most evident throughout history, is a separate phenomenon. While the Jews themselves have been quite successful in their destruction of; first the Aryan, and then the Gentile spirit, the problem that is the essence of their success that has existed long before the two groups had any contact of note, is the Aryan himself. It has been said before, but without the necessary emphasis. While the Jews have cleverly exploited Gentile weaknesses, it is not unthinkable that even without the existence of the Jews, Gentiles would follow a similar path. For this reason, it should be evident that most of history is not the result of the plotting of some clever Jews, but in-group fallibility. Every Aryan civilisation has caused its own degradation. In this way, the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade should not be viewed any differently to the Slave trades of Rome, nor should any figure or period with negative connotations be blamed on the influence of the Jews.

The core of this scapegoating problem is, as stated above, a problem of the inclusion of the insufficiently intelligent within the intellectual ranks of this anti-Jewish movement. For the Aryanist movement, we should aim for action and not moribund, relentless; and worst of all, pointless, pseudo-inquiry and rejection of actual authority. This is required, for the reason the unintelligent are included amongst the intellectuals is primarily because there is nothing to do in the anti-Jewish movement but speculate on this or that historical or contemporary person, era or idea. This is opposed to any group which supports the concept of a victory by informing, that “we” will be victorious simply by “awakening the masses” through ceaseless flooding of pseudo-intellectual and historical information. While information is definitely important in swaying the masses, it is only information in small doses; and preferably with proportionately high emotional content, that is necessary. This way, the prevention of the unintelligent from contradicting the intellectuals; and because of their numbers, overwhelming them, becomes as simple as restricting our propaganda efforts to a generalised and condensed format.

However, there are also a number of causes which pollute the propaganda and beliefs of those intelligent enough to be involved with the intellectuals. I think the fundamental issue is a lack of respect and a lack of thought. The majority of the anti-Jewish movement is composed of Americans who were born after the 1970s. As is stereotypically the case, they lack both respect and thought and indulge in their opposites. None are too afraid to accuse a certain person of historical value of being a Jew after only an hour of research. Similarly, many are under the illusion that their opinions, based on typically immature insights, opinions and a lack of wisdom, are actually of substance. Perhaps one of the reasons the anti-Jewish movement is having so much trouble is precisely because of this. For those in the past lacked the degree of, and in some cases any, historical precedence – at least that they were aware of – that proved their beliefs. Even in the case of National Socialist Germany, many may notice that certain members of the Elite were comparatively un-educated on the “Jewish Problem”. Despite this, the National Socialists were completely capable of forming proper policy and establishing an “official line” on the subject. While we are far more informed, we lack any wisdom. Instead of thinking, we give our opinions. Instead of analysing, we wait for someone else to do so, in order to reproduce the same analysis with alterations fitting our own opinions. All in all, this is the result of the badly parented younger generations who have been nurtured to the point of a collective egotistical narcissism.

An enormous amount of collective dysfunction are part of this problem, but I believe the above are the most detrimental. While they do not yet effect Aryanism, they will with its expansion. For this reason, we must target the right groups with our propaganda and our members must be able to follow without fully understanding the situation. We must entice the Elite with Aryanist spirit and the masses with a party platform. All in all, if we are able to create loyalty, we will be able to successfully create a mainstream movement which does not suffer from the usual side-effects of division, factionalism and fragility.

There is a distinct difference between modern environmentalism and Aryan environmentalism. The difference stems from the differing attitudes between non-Aryan and Aryan in regards to problems of such magnitude. This difference is fundamentally a difference between revolt and revolution.

The modern and popular conception of environmentalism takes the form of a revolt due to the decisions made, perhaps unintentionally, during its inception as a movement. Modern environmentalism opted for a populist, rather than an elitist structure. This ensured quick success and growing sympathy and support; towards which the widespread, at least partial, understanding of environmentalism is to be credited. However, to achieve this popularity, modern environmentalism sacrificed dedication and a degree of activism (the current activists are perpetually becoming proportionately smaller relative to sympathisers) as well as its originally “Radicalist” basis. Again, I am using the definition of “Radicalism”, which is listed on the glossary page. The sacrifice of its originally Aryan aspects (create mankind anew instead of developing more efficient energy solutions which only feed the problem) for popular support has resulted in its adoption of a form of activism categorised as “revolt”.

Environmentalism which is solely materialist can only be categorised as a “revolt”, populist and ultimately non-Aryan. A fine example of this is the popular term: “sustainability”. In other words, the most efficient exploitation of natural resources; with the least consequences, for the sole purpose of satisfying man’s narcissistic pleasures. This is only a revision of the current attitude towards the environment, typified by American society. It is only a revision due to the pragmatic need to increase efficiency and not to reduce consumption; but to satisfy the compounding desires of the rapidly expanding masses. Therefore, it can be seen that; as the term revolt is defined, so is modern environmentalism, “dissatisfaction with the consequences of presently popular thought”. Ultimately, non-Aryan environmentalism only exists in order to satisfy human desires as much as possible, for the longest period of time. Side-effects of this ideology are the half-measures, such as fluorescent light-bulbs and hybrid cars which only lessen the negative impact on the environment for fear of disrupting the masses in their march to oblivion via excessive consumption.

Aryan environmentalism is a total approach to our current environmental problems. The “totality” of Aryan environmentalism must be stressed. Aryan environmentalism is one aspect of an Aryan society which relies on all the others to function in a distinctly Aryan manner. While Aryan environmentalists will continue with the current research into alternative energies and other material solutions to many of the current problems (at a faster rate), an Aryan environmental policy will be free to solve the prime cause of our current problems and prevent the same from reoccurring. Without the Demographic, scientific and foreign policies of Aryanism, the environment can never be restored to its proper functionality. For this reason, unlike modern environmentalists, we must be able to pursue our ends through the acquisition of government powers.

Key to Aryan environmentalism is solving consumption. While non-Aryan environmentalists, like their economic cousins, never seek to solve the problem of consumption and the economic problem respectively, Aryanism must solve both. Instead of quenching the appetite of both (exponential growth in consumption), an Aryanist society will restrict consumption through proper education and a cut in the supply of excessive and undesirable goods and services. Of course, population reduction will also play an important part in reducing consumption.

An Aryanist government would also have the powers and means to convince the public of its large spending on conservation, creating national reserves, habitat restoration, resettlement of human population, etc., and any discontent it may cause.

Therefore, Aryanism should actively engage in the green, environmentalist and other such movements and their discussions. The current environmentalists, those of pure heart and genuine sincerity, will be easily assimilated into our movement.

Each movement, organisation and political party that relies on discipline and unity to achieves its goals must have a Code of Conduct. Codes that are lenient are used to create an image for this organisation. Codes that are strict and well-defined are used to deter potential members who do not have the desired character, as well as to establish a bond between members. Lenient Codes may simply be what to say and what not to say in public, while disciplined Codes may be as authoritarian as establishing diets, fasting periods, phenotype and physical health, formal education, combined with a general assessment of “spirit”. For Aryanism, the Code of any movement, organisation, group or order should lean towards the disciplined latter.

This is intended to be an open debate and should be interpreted as the foundations for any Aryanist organisation. An open debate will ensure that key requirements are not missed and useless requirements not included. It should also be noted that for an increase in quantity, increased leniency and decreased quality will result. The Code stipulated herein will be that of the “Elite” referred to in previous articles.

Note: 9th May, 2010 – Debate and further deliberation has precipitated some changes.

Body

• Vegetarian (and preferably vegan)
• No addictive consumption of any substance
• No tattoos

Character

• Idealistic
• Educated on Aryanism
• Self-Disciplined
• Initiative and creativity
• Potential to lead and follow
• No sexual promiscuity, perversion or degeneracy

Record

• Good financial history and absence of large debts
• Good employment and criminal record
• No members of any enemy organisations

There are some requirements that I have left out since I am not sure whether they will be too strict. I thought that perhaps a point system may work better, where each requirement has a set point value. Each requirement fulfilled forms a final score and the applicant is graded on that.

I hope that others can contribute to this concept and list.

An important aspect of a civilisation’s culture is its creativity and art from which its architecture originates. Architecture is a display of a civilisation’s moral superiority or inferiority and is often one of the first signs following cultural degeneracy. In part because of this, most political movements have an associated or preferred architectural style.

It has been often noted that authoritarian regimes adopt a classical architectural style. Even opposing regimes, as in recent history the decidedly classical architecture of Stalinist USSR and National Socialist Germany, have recognised classical architecture as the ideal form for promoting their own ideology. It should be established whether or not classical architecture is an Aryan form of architecture and whether its history is one of non-Aryan incursion, or a fundamental non-Aryan element. On top of this, it must be established whether classical architecture is the only fundamentally Aryan architectural style.

From its inception, classical architecture has been fundamentally Aryan. However, over time; following culture degeneration, classical civilisations adopted non-Aryan elements into their architecture. A widespread example of this is the gigantic scale of “classical” architecture which is often adopted by authoritarian regimes, often due to non-Aryan and plebeian input, or for a psychological effect on the masses. This has been the case with Stalinist architecture, in particular the enormous Palace of the Soviets. Arguably, the planned Welthauptstadt Germania, which was to replace Berlin, was an example of non-Aryan elements influencing something fundamental Aryan due to its ridiculous nature, scale and its overall absence of purpose.

More ancient examples of the influence of non-Aryan elements into the architecture of fundamentally or originally Aryan civilisations, can be found in the architecture from Augustus Caesar onwards. While Augustus himself was perhaps one of the Caesars most aware of the social and spiritual aspect of Romanism, the architecture of his period seems to be primarily for popular support; which, subsequently, formed the foundations of the Colosseum. It could even be said that the Acropolis of Athens was directed by non-Aryans who forced non-Aryan elements into classical architecture. I am also tempted to include the Palace of Versailles due to its pointless scale and its overtly pompous nature. It should be obvious that non-Aryan elements have gone into its construction when one sees the Gardens of Versailles.

Aryan architecture must have purpose beyond pure pragmatism. Housing may be exempt from these requirements, as they require a different, yet still Aryan, spirit in their creation. However, for cities the architecture must contain philosophical and religious input. The Aryan characteristics of modesty and elitism (domination of the superior) are always the first to be extirpated by rulers seeking popular support by the construction of enormous buildings, with little reason for their size, which are often home to some form of cultural degeneracy (as was the case with the Colosseum which promoted the non-Aryan degenerate entertainment of the plebs ).

Fundamentally non-Aryan architecture generally only occurs when cultural degeneration has reached an irredeemable stage. Examples are easy to identify as they are often only designed and built by civilisations dominated by economic concerns (e.g. the USSR’s uniform building of apartments with no character). These buildings often contain nothing beyond the pragmatic, or any beauty they do have has no significance beyond superficial historical importance (e.g. the White House). Despite the USA’s early adoption of neoclassical architecture, its attention was a fundamentally a non-Aryan one (conservative, libertarian, etc.). In this case, quite a lot of its “great” architecture was devoted to buildings lacking any Aryan principles or significance. This gradually developed into the rather stereotypical American trait of “bigger is better” and the chase for the biggest, and thus the best, of everything. This mentality has its roots in; originally, an Aryan architectural style which was quickly influenced by non-Aryan elements (perhaps a result of American exceptionalism as well as geographic and cultural isolation), and shortly thereafter, forming a new, fundamentally non-Aryan, architectural style, which is far more in line with American values.

Aryan architecture is noticeably of small or medium scale, possesses reason for its construction and has religious and philosophical themes as the foundations of its design. Aryan architecture, I do not think, is limited to classical form. A good example of this would be the Forbidden City. Despite being large, its scale is not of a pointless nature and its design is centred around numerology, astrology and mythology. Examples of Aryan architecture in Europe are too numerous to fully list, so I will only include those which come to mind: Ludwig II of Bavaria’s various castles; Buckingham Palace; St. Peter’s Basilica; etc.. Interestingly enough, one notices that nearly all examples of Aryan architecture were built solely for nobility.

As Architecture is an art, I will eventually find some suitable examples of Aryan and non-Aryan architecture, as well as both of these with their opposites playing an influential role. While this has touched on Aryan architecture, it has been primarily written in order to identify distinctly non-Aryan architecture. I will also expand upon Aryan architecture when I write an article with examples of what has been written above.

An Aryanist state’s demographic policies will remain as the most fundamental to the success of the state and Aryanism itself. Aryanists assume the following when discussing demographics:

• The earth and all continents are overpopulated
• The majority of the world’s population is of inferior stock
• Only the state can solve this “demographic crisis”

An Aryanist demographic policy must address overall population control and reduction as well as quality improvement gradually, particularly in its early stages. An enormous campaign of birth and quality control could only result in a compromise of economic and state security, particularly from external predators. As happened in National Socialist Germany, externalities caused the destruction of the state, ideal and an overall reduction in population quality. Thus, there should be a distinction between short-term and long-term demographic policies.

Short-term demographic policies should consist of the destruction of the most inferior stock and the increase in births of the most superior stock. For the first generation, the demographic policies will not be applicable to the mixed masses. Demographic policies should aim to increase superior births enough in order to replace the loss of births from the most inferior stock who are no longer reproducing. This short-term policy will probably only last for one generation. The switch to a long-term policy should commence after the external threats are neutralised or removed and the constant foreign hostility, which will necessarily occur due to the existence of an Aryanist state,  are pacified. The Nuremberg Race Laws of 1935 is a good example of this. It further distanced Germany from its neighbours, particularly France and Britain, and increased hostility which could only be resolved from a victory in the subsequent World War. After this, an implementation of the desired demographic laws would have taken place.

Long-term demographics should be adopted immediately after the demands of foreign policy have been met. The major difference between short and long-term policies will be the inclusion of the masses, who are mostly mixed between inferior and superior stock in most cases, into the demographic policies and laws. The aim should be to reduce inferior births substantially each generation and increase superior births enough to off-set this loss of population. The superior births will no longer have to equal the inferior births now that the threats to the economy and security do not remain due to hostile neighbours and overwhelming international pressure. Each generation, the policies should be made harsher for both the inferior stock and superior stock in order to further increase quality. I am of the opinion that the population cannot increase its quality without sufficient quantity. For this reason, superior births must remain high so that the policies can be made stricter without fears of underpopulation, or an increase in inferior births in relation to superior births.

Since a large section of the population will eventually be removed, social and Youth programs similar to the Hitlerjugend and Reichsarbeitsdienst will need to be established in order to disperse the superior stock amongst occupations which have suffered heavy losses as a result of the demographic policies. These are crucial in forming an Aryanist state without its original inferior stock and the negation of any superior/inferior rivalry in terms of occupations, which can only result in the encouragement of inferior births for the pleasure and exploitation of the part of the population which is of superior stock.

The state should, each generation, update the demographic policies in order to define a new inferior and superior stock (relative to each other). In this way, a constant improvement of the population quality will result, with sections of the population previously considered of superior stock now considered inferior. This process should continue indefinitely since even the superior stock will have slight inferior admixtures. High birth rates amongst the most superior will ensure that this process is not discontinued for pragmatic purposes.

While high birth rates should be maintained, they will still result in a reduction of the population due to the large amounts of inferior stock who have not reproduced. Thus, it can be said, that high births are not maintained in order to increase the population for real or imagined economic benefits, but in order to ensure a constant improvement of the quality of the population in future generations.

Over the past year or so the concept that the races, broadly defined as “White”, “Black”, “Asian”, “Arabic”, and sometimes “Native American”, should unite as a common front against Jewish domination has been influential amongst the otherwise aware theorists and commentators on Jewish control. The concept has caused the opposite of its aim; a passionate disunity, fueled by raw emotion and an embarrassing display of the primitive nature of men. This stalemate and bitter rivalry must be concluded either through a continuation of the unification concept or its rejection.

I think it is first important to withdraw from the clinging to this notion of unification for a proper analysis. To analyse and evaluate this concept, the reasons for and against its adoption should first be established. Subsequently, a decision must be made regarding what constitutes unification across racial lines. Is it a multiracial melting pot or more of a separatist alliance of nations and races? The desired conduct between nations and races should be established and the short and long-term goals of this unification concept should be developed. Overall, the current attempt at racial unification and cooperation is a weak and ill-thought out attempt which could have only been destined for failure.

The role Afrocentrism has played in this unification has been perhaps one of the main causes of its failure. Another attempt, lacking in logic, to create an equal footing, particularly between “Whites” and “Blacks”, turned into what is inevitably going to be the case: another form of supremacism. In an attempt to reduce or remove any notions of racial supremacy held by “Whites”; “Blacks”, who are involved in this racial unification against Jewish control of all goyim, have resorted to Afrocentric rhetoric. In doing so, they are promoting one supremacism for another. It has been started previously that the Jews create circular relationships, beliefs, structures and concepts in order to divide and paralyse the goyim. Furthermore, we can see the role of Jews play a more direct role in Afrocentrism. Afrocentrists, particularly those involved in the movement against Jewish control, are quick to point out that the author of two anti-Afrocentric books, one addressing Afrocentrism in general and one addressing “Black Athena”, Mary Lefkowitz, is a Jew.

Just as many are quick to point out the funding of Hitler by not only American bankers, but also Jews, as a reason to discard Hitler as “another puppet”. However, when one has properly studied Jewish behaviour throughout history, a short analysis of these two cases will prove interesting. Just as the Jews enjoy constant division, they also thrive with never-ending and circular debate. An example of this is the constant battles between Capitalism and Socialism, both being instigated and promoted by Jews or those of Jewish spirit. It should go without saying that Mary Lefkowitz is only one point of this circular debate. Her book, “Black Athena Revisited”, is addressed as a rebuttal to the book, “Black Athena”, by Martin Bernal, who is also a Jew. It is now obvious that Afrocentrism is simply a ploy in order for the goyim to react primitively and naturally to perceived threats against the nation or race they associate with.

Once racial unification and cooperation has been properly analysed and assessed, it should either be fully adopted as a fundamental part of the movement?s philosophy or totally discarded. Half attempts like has already occurred can only result in a repeat of the current disunity and fragmentation. However, it is also important to note that unity does not exclusively mean the integration of all similar beliefs. It is far more beneficial to have proper unity amongst a smaller group than less unity amongst an all-inclusive group.

If racial unification and cooperation is adopted as a legitimate tenant, then neither the constant inclusion nor the total exclusion of race from all other topics should be desired. Total exclusion leaves the movement easy prey to infiltrators who can easily create disunity and an over accentuation of race can cause what has already happened, a replacement of one supremacism over another.

A fundamental component of any revolutionary movement is an overall Weltanschauung. For a movement, this is derived from its outlook on history. This should not be confused with an improvised or impromptu refutation of sections of history which are only incomplete applications of the historical component of Aryanism. This historical outlook must stem from the movement’s Weltanschauung and must not be empirical. In due course, the completed historical outlook will be applied to history itself and the movement’s views of the eras and periods will be formulated using its Weltanschauung and historical outlook.

The Aryanist movement already has the foundations of a Weltanschauung. All that is remaining is the removal of contradictions and confusing concepts and its general improvement in quantity. The historical outlook should be a general, overall and firm view through which history can be interpreted. This will ensure that we form more accurate views of the past and thus the present and future.

The most obvious need for this is shown with the abundance of focus directed at “Jewish crimes” such as the attack on the USS Liberty. It should be stressed that these should only be employed for propaganda purposes. Focus on these events is only beneficial for causing emotional reactions as they are evidently insignificant on a historical scale. And this is what the Aryanist movement is lacking, insofar as it views particular events through a vague Weltanschauung and does not apply this Weltanschauung – and thus a historical outlook – to history in general for meaning and understanding.

A symptom of this lack of historical outlook is shown in the “truther” crowds. I do not use the word ‘movement’ for movement requires a direction, which the “truthers”, particularly those of Alex Jones, lack because of the absence of any paradigm shift in worldview upon awakening. Quite often the truthers will place Adolf Hitler alongside George Bush, Mao Zedong or a Rothschild. This is solely due to a lack of historical understanding. They claim that the Reichstag fire and the various American financiers of the NSDAP are evidence enough to view Adolf Hitler (and others) as another tyrannical puppet under the direct control of the Financial Elite. They make similar assumptions with numerous historical figures simply because they view each person as an individual, while ignoring their actions in the context of history.

However, if someone you already disliked stole a loaf of bread from you and then another person, whose identity you did not know, also stole a loaf of bread, your first reaction is to assume that their motives are similar or identical. Sometimes, you may even assume that they are working together. Without knowing the second person, you merge the person into the first because of the evident similarities. However, the inaccuracies become apparent when you consider that a rich man stealing a loaf of bread is completely different from an impoverished man stealing a loaf of bread. This can, and must be, applied to history. In the case of the Reichstag fire, it would have been impossible for anyone of that period to gain enough power to remove the Financial Elite, which is apparently so dreaded by the truthers, without the fire and the subsequent Enabling Act. Thus, a two-part conclusion is reached: firstly, that the truthers and their leaders are indeed not a movement, instead they are a chaotic crowd of motion without direction; and secondly, a historical outlook must be developed for a better understanding of past, present and future.

Another symptom of the lack of historical outlook is the overly pessimistic group of “truthers” and their affiliates. These types generally feel that the Financial Elite is far too powerful for them to defeat. The fatalistic of these are generally inclined towards Apocalyptic and Doomsday beliefs. Nevertheless, this also stems from a lack of historical understanding and scale. Without much difficulty, one can see when and where there existed no Financial Elite which had the same traits as its modern counterpart. However, the focus on particular events in history gives the impression that this Financial Elite has dominated all the civilisations of the world from time immemorial. In turn, this can either lead to a surrender to this power or a naive and dangerous fight against this Elite and all that ever existed, driving these types towards believing in absurdly radical forms of “progress”.

However, while this historical outlook can and should be applied to the larger groups from which we will eventually gain a support base, it is far more important to focus on the historical outlook of the Aryanist movement. While we do not suffer from the same degree of naivety and ignorance as the truthers, we nevertheless lack a vital organ of any revolutionary movement. Particular instances of this lacking are few amongst Aryanists. However, this is only due to a historical outlook of each individual instead of a more central, and perhaps more general, historical outlook and Weltanschauung. The aim is to complete the Aryanist Weltanschauung and develop a historical outlook. From here, a more cohesive and precise movement will emerge.

Adolf Hitler said:

The man who has no sense of history, is like a man who has no ears or eyes

As the engineered economic crisis morphs into a recession the anti-Government elements will now receive an increasing amount of popular support. The masses will be more likely to believe the theories of what were considered in the economic-boom “extreme” groups. As we know, dissent is controlled where necessary. This economic crisis should not be considered a re-run of the Great Depression. This time, they wield far more influence and power over the structures of the governments of the world, but unlike before they also have a firm grasp on the hearts and minds of the masses. They expect this to change with the material losses of the middle and lower classes. Machiavelli said:

People are quicker to forgive the death of a loved one than the confiscation of their property.

Therefore, they have set up numerous diversions and saviours ready for such an occasion. Popular interpretations of these diversions and saviours include Alex Jones and Barack Obama respectively. This is the ideal time to build a movement which will quickly gain a measure of popular support.

As the masses have not been dealt unbearable economic hardship we will not receive any increase in popular appeal. This is the period we should use in order to form the Elite of the movement that will become a party in a single country. The main countries on which to focus should be the nations of Western Europe as it is quite evident that their power is too deeply entrenched in the structure of the United States government as well as its remarkably docile inhabitants. In the USA we will not be able to build a movement that is precise and bears an accurate message. The best we can do is to disrupt the foothold the Jewish bankers have in the USA. It is highly doubtful that the USA will soon have a regime or administration that will deal a decisive blow to overall Jewish power from the bankers to congressmen and bureaucrats. This not to say that the USA should be abandoned. A determined effort should be made, but not for power in the USA but for certain political aims and reforms.

In the early stages of a movement it must be able to form a cohesive and unified Elite. Their beliefs may differ in opinion on minor matters, but differences of opinion mustn’t approach the possibility of disunity and factions in the movement. This Elite must include primarily men who are university-educated and who have the necessary qualifications for their positions. In the beginning this is not a realistic aim, therefore the Elite will be made up of primarily “intellectuals” and will later incorporate the educated men through whom the beliefs of the intellectuals will be carried out. Nevertheless, this Elite must be disciplined and must all have the same core beliefs. Most importantly, very few exceptions and compromises must be made to include people who do not fit this criteria. Once this movement structure is formed a gradual expansion, particularly in positions associated with Propaganda, should occur in a hierarchical fashion. I may post an article in the future with all the positions that are required for the initial phase of this movement.

This Elite must decide on the ends and means of the movement. It must create short and long term goals. A platform must be devised and perhaps a manifesto written, if only for reference amongst the members of the Elite. Positions according to merit must be assigned to members of the Elite and communication between the various sections of the Elite must be developed. Many people of like mind insist that we should all take our signs and “protest” in front of Synagogues or confront congressmen despite the impracticality of it. It is stupidity alone that would dictate a man with a degree in history who is of the same mindset as is compatible with this movement is encouraged to use his time and effort performing unimportant tasks. Such tasks should be the responsibility of those most adept with Propaganda and their staff.

Once this Elite is formed it should expand by targeting those already involved in the affiliated groups, parties and movements. Again, nothing short of a fundamental agreement should be reached before assimilation of these figures or groups into this movement. From here, previously exposed groups such as “truthers”, anti-NWO groups, Tribalists and the like should be targeted for suitable individuals to incorporate into the movement. It must be stressed again that major compromises only result in disunity and that the initial benefits of such an incorporation will be outweighed by the inevitable creation of factions that will occur. It is much better to keep this Elite small and unified than vice versa. For this reason, groups led by the likes of Alex Jones will be easy targets because of their lack of unity.

Without the formation of this Elite any efforts at Propaganda are pointless as they do not bring the frustrations of the masses, nor the skills of intellectuals and the educated, into the movement.