Usually it is a bad idea to work out internal disagrements in the middle of a blitz against another site, but I have to make an exception on this occasion.

Original Nobility is the concept that distinguishes Aryanism from traditionalism. It is the belief that nobility is our starting spiritual condition, from which we degrade by contact with the world. Our whole struggle is a struggle to revert to what we used to be. There exist people who appear to admire nobility, but who believe nobility is ACQUIRED from without (e.g. via education), rather than ARISING from within. They are traditionalists, not Aryanists. Aryanism is strongly opposed to ‘acquired nobility’ because it has the potential to mask inner ignobility and hence lead to confusion between Aryans and imitators and ultimately sabotage the selection process.

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2011/01/observations-around-society.html

Miecz said:

As the mature rank of society it is the duty of adults to determine what is best for kids and not letting the as of yet uneducated kids make their own decision.

That is a statement I’d expect to hear from traditionalists. As an Aryanist, I have the following concerns:

1) By not letting the kids make their own decisions, we are not allowing them to separate themselves by inner quality, from which we can select them.

2) The adults, being more corrupted by the very culture that Miecz is complaining about, are the last people I would trust to make any decisions on behalf of a less corrupted generation.

3) The kids, being as yet less educated by the very culture that Miecz is complaining about, are far more likely to make good decisions.

“When you offer a child the choice of a piece of meat, an apple or a cake, it’s never the meat that he chooses. There’s an ancestral instinct there. In the same way, the child would never begin to drink or smoke if it weren’t to imitate others.” – Adolf Hitler

Aryanism must be fundamentally optimistic towards children and their innate goodness, otherwise we do not really believe in Original Nobility.

If we let kids choose, soon many of them will not be able to comprehend the value of hard work and 30% will be obese

Even if this were true, as Aryanists we should allow this to happen. That 30% will be the 30% that won’t be permitted to reproduce. Whereas by short-circuiting this process through disallowing kids to choose, you pour that 30% back in, defeating the entire purpose of our distillation tower. You would also be endorsing slavery. (And this is why traditionalists do not really care about nobility, because they see no problem with using slavery to ‘achieve’ it.)

adults are not being tyrannical or despotic, they are being instructive

Your inclusion of this line suggests that you instinctively recognized the tyranny. That is a good sign, Miecz! From our other conversations, I truly believe you are an Aryanist, not a traditionalist, at heart. Hopefully I am getting through to that part of you with this post. Jews are not being ‘instructive’ when they try to fill our heads with their kosher education, they are being tyrannical. They are herding us. Similarly, adults who behave in such a way are herding children. We are not herders, we are farmers. Our crops are free to grow towards the sun or away from the sun. We then choose those which grow towards the sun for our field. It is no duty - it is abuse - to forcefully bend towards the sun those who are repelled by sunlight; our duty is to make sure we do not block the sunlight from those who seek it.

“Some children have so much vitality that they can’t sit still, and won’t and can’t concentrate their attention. It seems to me useless to try to force them. I understand, of course, that such an attitude annoys the teachers. But is it just to deprive a child of the possibilities that life offers him, simply because he’s unruly?” – Adolf Hitler

Older posts on related topics:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/education-issues/

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/preparing-us-for-the-slave-whip/

versus

http://thefallingobserver.blogspot.com

• Regular team members - AS, Miecz, Delendaestziobot, Andrew, Marduniya(?)
• Special guest - Severus (http://www.virtualseverussnape.org/)
• Others – all non-Jewish enemies of TOO welcome to join at any time!

Organization:

The only person formally delegating is Delendaestziobot. Everyone else should feel free to make suggestions, but he has final say. Each contributor can of course himself rebut whichever articles he wants (unless already covered by someone else), delegated or not, but we should try to complete delegations first. When you have a rebuttal ready, simply post it on your own blog and post a comment to let us know it is there for collection. I will then copy, proofread/edit and repost on the Falling Observer blog. Feel free to use the comments section over there to add extra discussion.

Suggestions:

Be concise. Stay on topic. Use plain language. Use lots of captioned pictures of Boromir. Use the screencap tool on your desktop. Be honourable at all times.

Elysium is missing. If anyone has heard from him since early December, please post a comment letting us know.

Because Elysium receives all the forms on the Contact, Submission, etc. pages on the main site, this means that if you have sent us anything via the forms this last month, it has probably not been read. Please refrain from sending anything via the forms until further notice. Instead, feel free to use the comments sections for now if you have anything else urgent to say. Better yet, start your own free blog and post a link to it, and then you can communicate with us or submit articles via your own publicly accessible posts.

Nonetheless, the propaganda war must continue. We are currently targeting Occidental Observer. Delendaestziobot, please take over the lead and delegate specific articles from that site for each of us to respond to, just to start things off. We’ll review after the first round.

And one last thing about vocabulary before we begin. It seems there is STILL confusion about what a Goy is, as evident in phrases in the comments like:

“Goy idiot” or “Goy in Ignorance.”

Goy behaviour

Goy

Member of any group viewed as an exploitable resource for another group

• E.g. non-Jewish humans, non-human animals
• Status descriptor, not character descriptor (esp. not a derogatory term)
• Not to be confused with Gentile

Being a Goy is not about how we behave, but about how the enemy views us. In Jewish eyes, Hitler was as much a Goy as George Bush. Everyone non-Jewish is a Goy in Jewish eyes, regardless of personal attributes. “Goy” does not mean stupid, or ignorant, or gullible, or passive, or any other character trait. It has nothing to do with character or behaviour whatsoever. All “Goy” means is they do not care about you. When we say Aryanism wants a world without Goys, all we mean is we want a world where nobody is exploited. 

I really hope this sinks in before we start the first blitz, or else I guarantee there will be another friendly fire incident very quickly.

Originally I was going to talk about the bombing in Egypt, but it’s so obvious that it hardly needs analysis. So I’ll just post a link to this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s2c-NqYH3g

http://aryanism.net/about/glossary

As promised, here is the improved Glossary for 2011. Please delete all outdated versions on your blogs and replace with this one. Thank you to all contributors for the suggestions during 2010 that went into this update.

And in case you missed his comment in the previous post, Andrew of NWFUSA is our newest team member:

http://nationalworkersfront.wordpress.com/

Anyone else? I know you are out there! Join us!

Now all we are waiting for is Elysium to come back so that we can kick off with a full team…..

“The future of a movement is determined by the devotion, and even intolerance, with which its members fight for their cause. They must feel convinced that their cause alone is just, and they must carry it through to success, as against other similar organizations in the same field.” – Adolf Hitler

I hope everyone had a good Christmas. (I originally thought I’d wait until New Year to post this, but I pressed the ‘Publish’ button by mistake while editing, so what the hell.) To the many of you still lurking, feel free to join us any time; better late than never, and we can always use more help. (Afzal, I like the precision with which you use language, and I think you would be a great asset to us if you became a regular. And Colin, you have been hanging around for ages and we’ve been waiting for you to join us all this time!) To those of you already on our list, here is the briefing to kick off 2011. To make sure there is absolutely no confusion, I have used Venn diagrams to illustrate the propaganda situation.

Hopefully this is mostly self-explanatory. While I have chosen to concentrate on the anti-Muslim aspect of 2, the same set also produces more general anti-”Third World” (Jewish terminology) propaganda, therefore this Venn diagram also applies to those cases.

Note 1n4. Yes (reminder to the newcomers), there are Jews producing anti-Jew propaganda! This does not make them anti-Zionists. As extensively discussed in the past, Zionist agendas can be served by anti-Jewish sentiments, as long as these sentiments are built on tribalist foundations. I repeat, the host can never threaten the parasite so long as the host loves itself more than it hates the parasite.

Our side is represented as follows:

All Aryanists are anti-Zionists, but not all anti-Zionists are Aryanists. Nonetheless, the green section represents the limit of the people we are prepared to ally with.

The enemy is represented as follows:

As is clear from the diagram, Jews are protecting themselves behind a solid barrier of Gentiles. Among these, the BS Gentiles are anti-Jewish, but this does not worry Jews in the least. Not only do the ZC Gentiles outnumber the BS Gentiles, but even the BS Gentiles are more concerned with watching out for the interests of their own group, which makes them fundamentally manipulable.

The next diagram shows what I see as the enemy strategy:

The blue arrow are the nationalist parties, ‘defence leagues’ and sites like Gates of Vienna, AmRen, etc.. Their effect is to get as many previously apolitical people as possible angry at the wrong targets.

The pink arrows are sites like – as Delendaestziobot mentioned – Occidental Observer. The upper arrow steals fence-sitters away from us, and tries to tempt or sow uncertainty among even our dedicated supporters. The lower arrow is even worse, as it tries to steer ideologically ungrounded anti-Zionists in completely the wrong direction in their search for ideology.

The yellow arrow are the Jews who claim to be on our side but could well be just trying to get Jewish voices back in among us to control the dissent by leading it:

http://www.youtube.com/user/frosthate

The next diagram shows how we must defend against this:

Elysium must call out those who try to get close to us for telltale signs of BS and be able to distinguish between misguided individuals and Jews/Gentiles. The former should be salvaged if salvageable; the latter must be rejected and identified as enemy.

Miecz must be a beacon of hope for people especially of our generation and younger, reassuring them that we are not about trashing the idealism presented in the good fraction of pop culture, but about taking idealism seriously rather than just as a feel-good orgy. If they are tired of being called “liberals” during arguments when they are in fact not liberal (moral relativist) at all, just tirelessly idealistic, then our flag is the flag they need to be gathering under, and the flag that Miecz needs to be waving at them as much as possible.

But ultimately, the best form of defence is offence, as illustrated in this last diagram:

Delendaestziobot has already started the attack on the BS Gentile camp with a great energy (and humour). Here is a blog where our blitz against Occidental Observer and its related network can be archived:

http://thefallingobserver.blogspot.com

I have included an example post.

Attack the leaders, and attack the foundations of their ideas. Do not bother to debate details with them – that is what they want us to do; even if we win, they have succeeded in wasting our time – but concentrate on taking the moral high ground. Expose how all their ideas can be reduced to the same few key attitudes every single time, and how these attitudes deserve no sympathy. When people see the ugly attitudes behind enemy ideas, the ideas lose their persuasiveness. Never forget to remind your readers that only in a society as dumbed-down as the current one do ideas as weak as theirs find reactionary appeal in the first place. From a cosmic perspective, their ideas are intellectually embarassing.

Marduniya I hope can lead a parallel attack on the ZC Gentile camp, and expose the Zionist nature of current reactionary politics. This is actually the most urgent mission of all, insofar as it is closest to the surface of what’s happening right now. Here is a blog where our blitz against Gates of Vienna and its related network can be archived:

http://theheldenplatz.blogspot.com

Like Delendaestziobot and BS Gentile leaders, Marduniya should also be on the lookout for other ZC Gentile leaders worth confronting. (One hint: Jews are mobilizing the South African racists to their cause, emphasizing Israeli support for apartheid era South Africa throughout the 1970s-1980s (including the nuclear weapons deal), South African Judeo-Christianity (heavily Old Testament-based) and of course encouraging hatred of black people. I suspect we will be crossing paths with them eventually.)

About these archive blogs, a new one will be created each time we identify a new network to confront. Feel free to suggest names for the blogs as we go along. Further discussion on the relevant enemy networks can occur over on the archive blogs so as not to clog up our own blogs.

As for the team division, none of it is set in stone. Everyone should feel free to jump in to help everyone else at any time, and everyone must feel comfortable about asking for help from anyone else at any time. The team division is just a rough guideline which may well evolve as we go along.

Note the word “Team”. Every current team member should try to recruit at least one new member who will contribute on your blog. This is in addition to anyone whom we might persuade to start their own blogs. Every one of your blogs should include a recruitment ad on a separate page, written in your own individual style, so that people unmoved by my rhetoric might be moved by yours. Every blog should aim to eventually have an entire team behind it. I do not ask anyone to sacrifice quality for quantity. On the other hand, we do need to grow in the number of active participants. It may be possible to pick up teammates by joining debates started by others and contacting those whom you see arguing from an implicitly Aryan perspective (though they may not use our vocabulary). All of us must become proficient at recognizing implicit Aryans. These are the people who, at the very least, while seeing that the status quo is awful, recognize that the ZC and BS alternatives are even worse. These are the people who have seen enough evil in every civilization in the world to refuse to join in the inane kettle-vs-pot discussions of “which civilization is better”. These are the people whom our enemies call “traitors”, but who in fact could become the most loyal soldiers of all – if they found a faction truly worth fighting for in the first place. We must be that faction.

But watch out for infiltrators. Anyone who joins in but then attempts to add ignobility to the ideology or start fights between team members needs to be dropped at once.

Finally, always emphasize that we are the faction trying to avert the war between non-Jews that our enemies claim is “inevitable”. We are here to continue the mission that Rudolf Hess began and had yet to complete. Hess failed to prevent WWII, but he has not yet failed to prevent WWIII. In the banal world of Jews and Gentiles, Hess was captured in 1941, sentenced in 1946, and murdered by Zionist agents in 1987, ending his life as “The Loneliest Man in the World”. In the sky that only Aryans can see, Hess is still alive as of 2011, flying towards his destination. And he is no longer alone.

—–

EDIT

1) Miecz requested clarification on how Muslims fit in. Here is another Venn diagram to illustrate this:

Most Muslims are just like most of any non-Jewish group – apolitical.

Then there are those who support Zionism, such as the Saudi elite which has already agreed to let the IDF fly through its airspace to reach Iran if it so wishes.

Then there are those who go around attacking everyone else, such as Anjem Choudary. He could be a Zionist agent, or he could be a useful idiot; who cares?

Then there are our allies over at Radio Islam (“the mother of all anti-Zionist sites”), one of the original leaders of the information war. Not as important in the propaganda war, but still great for reference:

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/english.htm

The “?” is another recruitment ad. Aryan Muslims (ie. Mohammedans, not Koranists), we want you on our team.

2) Welcome Andrew! I am glad to have you on board. Feel free to start your attack on Occidental Observer or other BS Gentile networks, either under Delendaestziobot’s lead or on your own, as you prefer.

Oh well, so much for taking a break from posting until New Year…

“By way of deception, thou shalt do war.” – old Mossad motto

Due to exposure of this motto by anti-Zionists worldwide, the motto has since been officially changed to:

“For lack of guidance a nation falls, but many advisors make victory sure.” – new Mossad motto

But the same meaning is actually still there if you look carefully. Nowhere in the new motto does it specify that the guidance or advisors occurs within their own country. In other words, it could refer to advisors in other countries guiding those countries towards ZC thinking, as is in fact the case, most obviously in the US but also in the many pro-Israel countries around the world. Old motto or new motto, herding of Goys is all it is.

Looks like another Zionist false flag, this time in Stockholm (OC was correct when he said Sweden would be a “test case”, though I don’t know if he meant it in this way). Here is the first test: can enough people in Sweden understand the idea of false flags (attacks perpetrated by one party so as to make another party appear responsible)?

Revolt of the Plebs covers the main points, and the rest of the site is a decent refresher on Zionist basics as well as recent news topics:

http://www.revoltoftheplebs.com/categories/breaking-news/one-dead-as-two-blasts-hit-stockholm/

http://www.revoltoftheplebs.com/categories/breaking-news/swedish-bombing-military-staffer-knew-about-attacks-report/

Aryanists in Sweden (and elsewhere too!), please make extra effort to explain to people – even completely apolitical people – about false flags, and speak out against people who are keen to blame the attack on Muslims as usual. We can already guess what the Laserman Parties (especially SD) and their supporters are going to do with this news: celebrate in private and then pretend to be outraged in public to whip up Islamophobia AGAIN. Don’t let them succeed!

In other news, Marduniya has joined us on the blogosphere, as promised:

http://www.iranica-chan.org/marduniya

Let’s all give him a warm welcome! I for one look forward to his contribution and hope he is ready to receive delegations as well as perhaps delegate to the rest of us in return. Anyone else want to join our growing propaganda team?

This is the month to take stock and formulate plans. Please feel free to add in comments your ideas for the upcoming year.

The Wake-Up Scam

I’m making it final: anyone who claims people are “waking up” is our enemy. “Waking up” means nothing more than trundling the next step along the neverending curve on which Jews are ahead of us, already laying the step after that. The best way to respond to anyone who claims people are “waking up” is to tell them that Jews sold them their alarm clock.

Gentiles refuse to understand the elementary concept of backlash politics, the idea that timed, pre-anticipated backlashes themselves form part of the process of control and the illusion of ‘people power’, and that policies promoted by those in power at any point in time are designed to generate such backlashes periodically, such as the current backlash that Gentiles love to boast about leading. Gentiles are too conceited to contemplate the possibility that they too are being manipulated. When I read Gentile blogs, all I see is Boromir with the Joker’s arm up his butthole. And Boromir thinks it feels good.

We do not need people to “wake up”. We need people ready to abandon this rotten civilization for a fresh start. The last thing we need are people “waking up” and rabidly defending the very thing that needs to be destroyed. The greatest survival strategy of the parasite is to convince its host to love itself more than it hates the parasite. Those who do not acknowledge this concept are our enemies. Do not confuse us with the Gentiles who merely fantasize about a structural collapse from which they plan to install their Gentile feudalisms. When I refer to this civilization, I do not mean just the forms and instruments, but the values on which the forms and instruments were built, namely all notions of endlessness: endless growth, endless progress, endless discovery, endless survival.

Vocabularywise, it is time to dump the rest of the information war era terminology as much as possible. One term I never really liked was “New World Order (NWO)”, as it implies that we are loyal to the existing order, which we are not. “Zion” is preferable to “NWO”, and should be used in as many dystopian contexts as possible. The worlds of “Nineteen-Eighty-Four” or “Brave New World” should be referred to as “political Zions”. Someone stuck in a bad job should be described as being in “career Zion”. Someone trapped in an unhappy marriage should be described as being in “relationship Zion”. The processes of endlessness in the paragraph above should be referred to as “hedonistic Zion”, “technological Zion”, “academic Zion”, etc.. Zion should carry the connotation of sustainable slavery. Any system which enslaves anyone but which in so doing does not bring about its own collapse is a Zion. These are the systems we must oppose, because our opposition alone can end them – they, being sustainable, will not end by themselves.

Blindsided

In our focus on Europe and West Asia, we have not paid sufficient attention to the unfolding Zionist agenda in East Asia, where Jews seem to be stacking their WWIII wild cards. We have Zionist South Korea trying to invade anti-Zionist North Korea, moronic fighting between Chinese Gentiles and Japanese Gentiles, and Zionist agents/useful idiots such as Liu Xiaobo trying to start civil war inside China. We need to be more alert to developments in this area of the world and understand how it fits into the bigger picture. We also need to attract more East Asian visitors and (eventually) Aryanist contributors.

Gentile behaviour really is the same everywhere. Japan and South Korea should be focusing before anything else on ending the military occupation of their territory by US troops, but instead Jews have got them thinking that their own neighbours are the enemy and the US troops are ‘protecting’ them. China should be using its influence to re-establish worldwide the normality of autocracy, but instead Jews are re-promoting dead Freemason Sun Yat-Sen and getting the Chinese to think that China is backward(!) for being ‘still’ undemocratic. We must refer to countries like China and North Korea as bastions of autocracy. Whether we agree with their policies is irrelevant;  at least their form of government is not completely screwed up.

North Korea must not fall. Were North Korea to fall, yet another nuclear stockpile would end up under Zionist control. (I would not put it past the Zionists to then immediately launch the nukes and claim they were launched while North Korea was still in control.) There needs to be an organized boycott of South Korea similar to the boycott of Israel, starting now. Americans in particular must stand staunchly against any US military involvement in support of South Korea and destroy the mainstream notion that South Korea is an any way an “ally”. The 1950s US involvement in the Korean War should be spoken of as a terrible mistake (orchestrated by the usual suspects) – similar to Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan – which must never be repeated.

Our message to South Korean and US troops is simple, and the same as that to troops of all Zionist colonies around the world. The politicians and bankers cannot force you to follow their orders, and they are sure as hell not going to do any fighting themselves. They have no real power over you. All it takes to avert war is your willingness to refuse to fight. There is no honour in killing and dying at the behest of so-called ‘leaders’ who are themselves unwilling to die for the same cause, so don’t do it. The future is not set. Do not waste your one chance to change it, if the chance should come.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfZke069f4g

Bringing Home the Flag

From the beginning, one of our aims was to take back the swastika, take back the terms “Aryan” and “National Socialist”, take back Hitler’s legacy from the racists. I believe conditions are ripe for success here. Hitler is declining as a popular icon for racists. (To the antifas, please stop calling racists “Nazis”. You are becoming almost as annoying as the racists themselves.) Now all that needs to happen is for more supporters of other causes to be convinced that Hitler was the greatest champion of their causes all along, and openly venerate him as such. Not just anti-Zionists, but anti-democrats in general, anti-consumerists in general, anti-secular-humanists in general, radicals on every issue – they all need to start considering Aryanism as the most rational unification of all their beliefs. We should aim to recruit in particular two types of activists:

1) those whose chief concerns are fringe issues that must be brought into a larger theoretical base in order to have any chance of impact

2) those starting to realize that the mainstream representation of their concerns is completely ineffectual

Emphasis should especially be placed on the fact that we are not a single-issue movement, but a panoramic ideology with implications for every issue under the sun (hence our flag). Emphasis must also be placed on the fact that we need them just as much as they need us. And this is the truth: we cannot do anything unless we unite enough people and keep them united.

We should focus our outreach towards younger people. National Socialism has always been young at heart, and has always found its most devoted followers among those who came to it while young. If older people want to join us, fine, but we must not waste effort persuading them when that effort is better spent on winning over younger people. This means we have to speak a youthful language, and use archetypes that young people brought up in pop culture can relate to. (This is why I think Miecz’s job is so important.) Above all, we must never make statements that could be interpreted as belittling or otherwise looking down upon young people and the attitudes they typify; rather we should speak positively of such attitudes. In Hitler’s words, “It is a mistake to say that youth is stupid; youth follows its instinct.” We should never criticize anything by describing it as “childish” or “immature”; to do so contradicts our own tenet of Original Nobility. (This does not mean we go soft on decadence among young people, but we call it for what it is, decadence from Original Nobility, not “arrested development” (Gentile rhetoric). They do not need to “grow up” (Gentile rhetoric), they need to revert to how they used to be.)

Delendaestziobot, you made a good point about not being escapist, but then immediately negated it by complaining about “infantility”. The etymological meaning of “infant” is “without speech”; the military infantry comes from the same root, and the connotation is wholly positive. Infantility, far from escapism, is the pure, raw consciousness of reality unprocessed by language and abstraction, which most of us lose after learning to speak, and which martial arts practitioners spend a lifetime of training trying to recover. Infantility is the most spontaneous form of immanence. As Joseph Goebbels noted, “A child laughs when it feels joy and cries when it feels pain. Both things, laughing and crying it does with its whole heart. We all became so tall and so clever. We know so much and we have read so much. But one thing we forgot: to laugh and cry like the children do.” You said:

It’s all this “Follow your dreams” meme, the Aryan should not follow his/her infantile dreams

I emphatically say the Aryan should follow their infantile (ie. PURE, UNCORRUPTED) dreams, because the dreams of an Aryan (by definition!) are bound to be noble in character. It is the non-Aryan who should not follow their SELFISH, DECADENT dreams, which is what the modern “follow your dreams” meme pertains to ie. “follow your dreams (of becoming rich and famous)”. I personally have dreamt since childhood of a world without exploitation (especially of animals), and if I had ceased to follow it, I wouldn’t be here right now. I am not going to stop following it any time soon, nor do I believe you would want me to stop following it. Right?

Foppery

“When men acquire the habit of a certain type of behaviour, and make the gestures corresponding to it, it ends by becoming second nature to them. Words lose their meaning, the best-established notions create new events. With them, pride becomes transformed into vanity, egotism becomes confused with idealism.” – Adolf Hitler

I understand that we deal with deep ideas and encourage thinking from many angles. This does not mean, however, that we are a book club. If that had been our intention, we would have got a message board instead. No, we are part of the anti-Zionist movement – albeit the theoretical/ideological wing – and that is what we will remain until Zionism is defeated. A movement is not a club. We are not here to enjoy ourselves, though if you enjoy this kind of activity (I don’t, in fact I long for the day when this is all over), good for you. Nor are we here to socialize, though if we become friends through our cooperation, excellent.

What this means is that we must exercise self-discipline over what we discuss here, including in comments. If it doesn’t contain:

a) a polemic argument, key fact, or new vocabulary with propaganda value

b) an observation of what our enemies are doing

c) positive advice that readers can actually take away and apply to their daily lives

d) a technical suggestion on how to improve the site itself

don’t post it. You are not impressing anyone with your undoubtedly vast knowledge of whatever subject you are spouting off about. All you are communicating is your ego. On the other hand, if it does contain one of these, then DON’T HESITATE TO POST IT, even if it doesn’t sound that impressive or groundbreaking! A one-or-two-sentence comment that contains one of these (even just pointing out a typo) is much better than several paragraphs of academic blathering. If we win, there will be time afterwards to discuss academics. If we don’t win, what difference does it make?

The same applies to private correspondence. A brief but prompt reply to an email is better than a slow, detailed reply. Understand that when you delay replies, you are slowing down not just the person you’re replying to, but potentially the entire queue of action for everyone in the team. Try to respond within 24 hours if possible. And let people know when you are away so they can get on with other projects that does not depend on your approval rather than sit there waiting for a green light. These little wastages add up, and lose us weeks or even months each year.

And keep your language plain. Whenever you can choose between two words with the same meaning, choose the simpler word. Those who use big, archaic or uncommon words for the sake of it reveal only their lack of empathy and their uninterest in sincere communication. Similarly, the people who might be impressed by verbal gymnastics are not the kind of people we want anyway. You can tell a lot about an ideology from the writing style of its advocates. Do not forget that our readers are all the time forming impressions of Aryanism based on our writing styles.

Force Multiplication

As I see it, Delendaestziobot has identified the BS Gentiles (Jew-aware but still counterproductive, mainly racist) as his main counterpropaganda target, which is good. Others who want to help the propaganda war on this level should either liase with him and coordinate coverage, or independently cover the targets he is missing in order to reinforce his efforts. His should also be the regarded as the primary blog for discussing BS Gentile barbarism, whereas discussions on this blog should be used to emphasize who WE are.

However, we also need – perhaps more urgently – people prepared to deal with the ZC Gentiles (non-Jew-aware and counterproductive, mainly Islamophobic) in a similar fashion. Admittedly this is a lower level of propaganda, but we are not here for intellectual stimulation, we are here to prevent needless violence between non-Jews. I have heard that Marduniya is preparing to join us, so perhaps he could consider taking charge of this front of the propaganda war.

Additionally, we are also looking to recruit news commentators, ideally one for each geographical area in the world. News commentators would not have to do a lot of original writing, you would merely need to link to relevant news articles and briefly demonstrate the Jewish/Gentile slant or otherwise provide ideological analysis. Therefore these positions should be easily filled; all it takes is your willingness to volunteer. If you are already taking daily time to follow the world news closely, why not help us?

A cartoonist who can draw newspaper style cartoons as commentary on world issues would also be a strong addition. If you would like to try it out, we would more than welcome you.

I am also looking for someone who wants to try writing fiction: specifically a vampire vs zombie vs werewolf story (I hope it is obvious by now who these three groups represent). I will talk you through the plot and themes; I just need someone wiling to fill in the details.

Even if you are unsure what your role might be, I suggest you sign up for a free blog first (and post the link in a comment below), even if you don’t post anything on it for the time being. It is often the case that, when you have the blog there, you will intuitively know what to do with it. Perhaps you might see a delegation just right for you, and can take it up! I repeat, have a blog ready for use, and let your role find you.

Lastly, on top of propagandists, we also need a squad of memetists – team members devoted to commenting on other sites using our arguments and our vocabulary. If your strength is forum/comments section debating, this could be the ideal role for you. Let us know you are ready to do this so we can give tactical orders on which sites to target at which times. For all these positions, it is not enough just for us on this blog to do all the recruiting, in which case we would at best achieve linear growth, which is far too slow to change anything. Instead, every team member we recruit must eventually also become a recruiter. Only in this way can we grow at anywhere near the necessary rate to make a difference.

What we lack in numbers, we must compensate for in superior quality. I genuinely believe that Aryanism by its very character is more likely to attract high quality people, but we must actually display this with our unity. All of us here are volunteers; there is no money or other transferable advantages involved; we also have minimal social communication with each other. This is the way we have tried to keep it, so that literally the only thing keeping us working together is our shared idealism. We are a folk. Yes, there are many sites more popular than this one. What we are counting on is our visitors being more willing to contribute than their visitors. Your action or inaction really will make a difference. True to the National Socialist economic principle, we’ve never asked for money; we ask and ask instead for you to allot a few hours of your time each week to the cause. Time, and the work which can be done during that time, is ultimately what money buys, and also what can be volunteered by a folk. Mayer Amschel Rothschild (Jew) famously said in 1790, “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” 220 years later we retort: donate to us your time and your effort, and we transcend whoever controls the money.

We need to know you are here beside us, ready to contribute your skills one way or another. I promise: the larger our team becomes, and the more united and disciplined it can keep itself, the more clearly all will see how strong our ideology really is. Our ideology can intellectually and morally SQUASH every rival ideology in existence. But it takes people like you to become living images of the swastika and take on challengers from all enemy camps.

Aims for 2011

1) Christian-Mohammedan Solidarity

Nothing solid is going to happen until we get this off the ground. Trust me.

Christians, stop attacking Mohammed. He was a far better Christian than almost all who call themselves Christians. Consider what Jesus himself would say about Mohammed (who simply continued Jesus’ own war against Zion on a larger scale), and either follow Jesus’ noble example or else stop calling yourselves Christians.

Muslims, stop insisting the Koran is infallible. Mohammed himself wouldn’t recognize the Koran if he saw it. You must decide whether you are Mohammedans or Koranists. If the former, then follow Mohammed’s noble example and re-establish the eternal truth once more using your own faith instead of defending a book written after Mohammed’s death. If the latter, you will one day lose our support as we become better Mohammedans than you.

Christians, concentrate on finding the Second Coming of Christ.

Muslims, concentrate on finding the Mahdi.

When you find them, listen to them, because they will tell you what we have been telling you all along: you are on the same side.

Also when you find them, tell them to contact us.

2) Dynamism

Lest anyone think I was singling out Muslim fundamentalists for criticism, the same applies to National Socialists. You have to decide whether you are Kampfers or Mein-Kampfers.

A Kampfer is one who has internalized the lifelong spiritual struggle that defines the inner dimension of National Socialism. Awareness of the noble destination to work towards, and always seeking out better paths towards this destination, without fatigue, without complacency, without limitation by tradition; this is the Kampf that Hitler embodied so well that it continues to inspire us. Academics, who criticize National Socialism as a system lacking in consistent form, receive the response from Kampfers that this is precisely why National Socialism is superior: only the destination is fixed and absolute for all time; the paths towards it are as variable as required to reach it as quickly as possible.

A Mein-Kampfer, on the other hand, is self-explanatory. This is the National Socialist equivalent of the Koranist.

Rudolf Hess is believed to have been the uncredited co-author of “Mein Kampf”. Certainly he knew its content inside out. But his greatest advice to us is: “Be true to Hitler’s spirit! Ask in all that you do: what would the Führer do?” We must consider how Hitler would react in today’s situation, rather than merely study endlessly what he did in his own era. Hitler never had to deal with a nuclear-armed Israel. Nor did he have to deal with people as dumbed-down and bloodthirsty as the people today. I believe 100% that he would have had the more than adequate ability to deal with these issues if he had been alive today, but I also believe 100% that he would not be dealing with them using a 1930s approach. Therefore we shouldn’t either.

3) Radical Third-Positionism

We must perfect our skill in classifying everything into Jewish, Gentile and Aryan. We must discredit all competing classifications, especially others who claim to be third-positionists. We can do so using the following formula:

i) If there appears to be only two opposed positions, both of which are ignoble, create a third which is opposed to both.

ii) If there are already three or more opposed positions, all of which are ignoble, reduce them to two opposed positions by finding deeper commonalities, and then apply i).

iii) Find a word that encapsulates both the ignoble positions under one concept.

Hitler was a grandmaster of this technique, which he used to classify all his anti-capitalist rivals as spiritual communists, and all his anti-communist rivals as spiritual capitalists. We have moved beyond economics alone, but the method remains the same. Practice it!

Do not introduce sub-classifications. Sub-classifications serve only to weaken the thrust of the main classification. Talking about Levantines, Khazarians, etc. weakens the category “Jewish”. Talking about Europeans, Asians, Africans, etc. weakens the category “Gentile”. In the same way, “Aryan” needs no further qualifier. We are what we are.

4) Asymmetric Propaganda Warfare

Again, we are a small team fighting against much more numerous enemies. We will not win a war of attrition. They will produce propaganda in greater volume than we can counter even if all of us worked 24/7 non-stop. We must focus all our attacks on the leaders. What I propose is the propaganda equivalent of blitz tactics:

i) Create a list of enemy leader sites.

ii) As a team, go down the list one at a time and spend several weeks doing nothing except tearing their ideas to pieces.

iii) Archive the blitz material on a separate blog.

iv) Thereafter, when we see anyone promoting that site again, post a link to the relevant archive.

5) Semantic Precision

No matter how disciplined an army is, if the soldiers can’t shoot straight, they will still lose. In propaganda warfare, words are our ammunition. We have been improving in our use of words, but we are still not at the level we should be at (and yes, this includes myself). Here are a few suggestions to aid further improvement:

i) Read through all your old posts once and edit them for language and concision, just to see how much can be trimmed and fine-tuned.

ii) Make a list of unnecessary terms (mainly categories) you have used in the past, and do not use them in future writing.

And do not worry, I will be updating the Glossary early next year.

Closing

We often write as though we still have plenty of time left before the final implosion. Perhaps we do, perhaps not, or perhaps some of us have more time than others. Nobody really knows how fast events will accelerate; your guess is as good as mine. But remember this much: Jews are guessing too. On no occasion can they be sure whether non-Jews will react in the way that they expect. Herein is the inextricable flaw of their system, onto which Aryanism has chosen to concentrate its attack. They can lie about the past, the present and the future, but ideology is timeless. As long as our objective is self-preservation, all they need to do to control us is portray others as threats to us. But the moment we decide that our enemy is not those who pose a threat to us (whoever they may be) but those who try to convince us that preservationism can justify dishonour, all their lies become inconsequential. Therefore do not even say that Jews are a threat to us, as that is rhetoric on the Jewish level. Say instead that Jews want us to define ourselves by what threatens us, instead of by what we oppose. This is even true of Jews who claim to be fighting on our side (Elysium knows whom I am referring to). 

Unity Through Nobility. These three words, if profoundly understood and put into practice by enough people, are sufficient to defeat the entire text of the Tanakh, Talmud, Protocols and every other book ever written by a Jewish author. Every reader of this blog: start with yourself, spread it from there, and perhaps we might see hope by this time a year from now.

See you all in 2011.

Miecz’s recently completed LOTR reivew is a must-read; go to his blog and check it out if you haven’t already. The amount of work he has put into it is clear from the detail of his study, and it is probably the best review of its kind anywhere on the blogosphere. He is tackling both the books and the movies simultaneously, which makes the review especially valuable.

I generally agree with his interpretation of LOTR. As usual, I am just here to pick over the words with which to communicate this interpretation, for propaganda purposes.

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2010/11/aryan-kampf-in-lord-of-rings-part-ii.html

I would not call Hobbits Gentiles. Bilbo’s description of his people, “Where our hearts truly lie is in peace and quiet and good-tilled earth” indicates a farmer archetype. While individual Hobbits do steal things sometimes, their community as a whole is supported by growing their own food, not by exploitation. Frodo in particular surely cannot be described as a Gentile; even from the beginning of the adventure he is characterized by a sense of duty towards the wider world that places him firmly in the Aryan category. His key line “I will take the Ring to Mordor, though I do not know the way” captures his Aryan spirit perfectly (more on this later), and this was before the Fellowship was even formed. So while I certainly agree Frodo reached a much higher level by the end of his journey, I think we should emphasize how he always had the seed within him, which Gentiles do not have.

Gentile is not a ‘neutral’ term. It is to be used with a negative connotation, to describe the negative qualities distinct from those of Jews. The Men of Rohan can be described as Gentiles (as you did), but that is probably why I never liked them that much. In fact they are the only group that was attacked in revenge for their past behaviour, namely by the Hillmen whom they used to oppress. Also note Theoden’s reluctance (even after expelling Grima) to risk his own people for the greater good; without Gandalf around, I highly doubt he would have made the right decision in the end. (In contrast, Haldir and his team show up at Helm’s Deep without even being asked. And Haldir had to die before Theoden finally ‘got it’.)

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2010/11/aryan-kampf-in-lord-of-rings-part-i.html

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2010/11/aryan-kampf-in-lord-of-rings-part-iv.html

http://swordofelysium.blogspot.com/2010/11/aryan-kampf-in-lord-of-rings-part-vi.html

Also, I am concerned with your use of the term “immanence”. We have been building up this term as a positive term to describe a key Aryan attitude, yet you have used it several times to describe Jewishness. How can Jews be immanent? They are schemers! All their processes, whether financial, political, psychological, etc. are based on manipulation of timeframes and apparent realities so that they can use one deception to cover another, over and over again. They establish the route to success before beginning to act. That is the exact opposite of immanence. Again, I repeat Frodo’s line: “I will take the Ring to Mordor, though I do not know the way.” THAT is immanence: willingness to act without calculating everything in advance, certainty in the destination without necessarily knowing the path. Or Aragorn’s speech before the final battle: “A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day. An hour of wolves and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down! But it is not this day! This day we fight!” THAT is immanence.

I know what you are trying to say and completely agree with it, I just recommend a different word, since this is an example of what I refer to as “friendly fire”. When half of us use a term positively and the other half use the same term negatively, we are not as effective a propaganda team as we could be.

Since the topic has come up in the comments, here is a new post where the discussion can continue, rather than go off topic in the other post.

An older post that is also relevant is this one from a year ago:

http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/swedish-anti-zionist-party-to-be-formed/

I am not sure how much progress has been made with this party, and would appreciate Afzal or anyone else in Sweden providing us with any news on the matter. I would emphasize that if the party is still unofficial, then now is actually the best time for Aryanists in Sweden to offer your services and idea input. As a pre-official contributor, you could potentially influence the party ideology to a much greater extent than you could if you merely joined as a generic member after it becomes official. Afzal, I would say your best bet is to contact Mohammed Omar and try to become someone whom he might listen to.

Alternatively, there is apparently another anti-Zionist party being prepared, though again I have found no details, so this is also something we would like Aryanists in Sweden to look into and report back about:

http://si-info.org/index.php?id=556

In any case, we have to have a two-tiered approach:

1) Who are the true revolutionaries?
2) Who do we vote for and support in the short-term to slow down the enemy, and hence buy time for the true revolutionaries to prepare?

In this case, the answer to 1) would seem to be these fledgling anti-Zionist parties. The answer to 2) requires a bit more care. We all agree that the SD must be prevented from power at all costs. As such, the ND and Svenskarnas are useful in that they could split the SD vote. HOWEVER, so long as the ideas they promote are bad (and I completely agree that they are bad), the spreading of these ideas themselves will give the true revolutionaries more problems to deal with later. Therefore, we must not make the mistake of promoting ND or Svenskarnas to anyone other than SD supporters. The tactically sound response should be:

a) The people who would otherwise definitely vote SD could be persuaded to consider ND or Svenskarnas. 
b) Everyone else should be dissuaded from sympathy towards any of these three.

Ideally, for the purposes of 2)b), Sweden needs the equivalent of something like the Respect Party in the UK, which can give (to the people who have lost faith in the old parties) an effective, albeit superficial, alternative to the BNP, UKIP, etc.. Afzal, could you tell us if such a party exists in Sweden?
 
The best way to judge a party is by the personality type of its main support base. I see one personality type across the SD, ND and Svenskarnas: people who were cheering for the new ‘Laserman’ serial shooter in Malmo. We could call the SD, ND and Svenskarnas the Laserman Parties. It is this Gentile personality type that makes it easy for Jews to start civil wars. For all we know, the real shooter(s) could be Zionist agents.

http://www.thelocal.se/29720/20101020/

For my promised November movie review, I’ve chosen to examine “The Dark Knight”, released 2008. I consider it easily one of the best-made movies of the decade, and a great surprise following the rubbish that was “Batman Begins”. Christian Bale’s portrayal of Batman is my favourite among all the actors who have played the character, and Heath Ledger puts on the performance of a lifetime as the Joker. The atmosphere of the movie captures very well the darkness inside which more and more of the world now feels it lives, and the story deals with numerous ideas relevant to the times, which I think deserve reflection from the perspective of revolutionary politics.

The significance of Batman is that he has no superpowers at all. What he has instead is a lot of money. Bruce Wayne exemplifies one of the few ways to spend money positively: not to try to fund change from within the system, which inevitably plays right back into the enemy’s hands (more on this later), but to acquire the means with which we can work outside the system – in his case advanced weaponry with which he becomes Batman to fight crime in person. An example of Batman’s effectiveness is provided early in the movie. Lau moved to China to use the defence of national boundaries against arrest by American police (similar to how Jews on more than 100 occasions have repeatedly found countries willing to take them in even as others were expelling them). Batman’s response is to sidestep national boundaries and capture Lau himself. In the Joker’s words: “Batman has no jurisdiction.”
 
The foil to Batman is Harvey Dent, who is trying to work within the system, and his devolution into Two-Face as the story progresses. The descent begins almost as soon as Wayne decides to promote Dent, and we were never really surprised that it would happen as the Joker’s side continues to win (even when the Joker himself at times appears to be captured or defeated) via his own agents who are also embedded within the system. The Joker’s speech to Dent in the hospital reveals the fundamental problem with the masses that prop up the entire system: “Nobody panics when things go according to plan, even when the plan is horrifying.”

The Joker himself is not so much an individual villain as the embodiment of the times. It is implied that we should not try analyzing him as a person early on when he tells multiple conflicting backstories about himself. The movie also deliberately leaves out explanations of how the Joker manages to coordinate his agents, thereby making it feel as though everything just fell into place naturally. This is further reinforced by the opening scene where each masked bank robber kills the one before him, leaving only one alive at the end, who then removes his mask and reveals himself to be the Joker. As such, we cannot dismiss the movie by thinking that none of it would have happened if the Joker hadn’t shown up; the point is, when the people as a whole have sunken low enough, the events of the movie become a matter of course. If you understand the Joker as a collective archetype, you will see his face behind the barbarism that has been spreading through the real world this decade, and about to spill over into the next. Zionists might have been responsible for the false-flag terror attacks, but Zionists cannot force people to condone the insane invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan in response; the Joker was the one who did that. Zionists might be funding the EDL and all the other so-called ’defence leagues’ and all the nationalist/anti-Islam parties, but Zionists cannot force people to join them or vote for them; the Joker is the one doing that. In his words: “Madness, as you know, is like gravity. All it takes is a little push.”

It all culminates in the “social experiment” scene, where the Joker gives the passengers on each boat the option of detonating the other boat to save themselves, or risk the other boat possibly doing the same to them. Even more poignantly, he has set it up so that one boat contains convicted prisoners while the other contains ordinary civilians. (This is a classic Zionist tactic, symbolized by the Freemasonic black-and-white chequered chessboard: when you want to start a war, divide people into White Pawns and Black Pawns such that White Pawns believe Black Pawns are intrinsically evil, and Black Pawns believe White Pawns will insist they are evil no matter how they behave. We and other anti-Zionists have been exposing this trick for years.) Then we see the foolishness of the military crew trying to let the passengers vote on the issue.

Simultaneously, we have the police SWAT team surrounding the Joker’s building and talking about: “taking out the clowns and saving the hostages”, while Batman, who is inside the building, realizes: “The SWATs are attacking the wrong people. The clowns are the hostages.” (Sounds familiar? You’ve probably read it here ten times before.) But it all happens too quickly, and Batman ends up having to fight both the Joker’s henchmen and the SWAT team at the same time just to save the hostages. This is what we are trying to avoid having to do, by the way.

Of course, because it is a movie, the passengers end up making the right choice and not pressing the button, but as I watch the news every day and read enemy blogs every day, I wonder if we can find enough people in reality willing to do the same.

Finally, let’s look at the Judaic brainwashing inside this movie. While this movie contains excellent social commentary and ethical positives, it also contains a mind poison that, if swallowed along with the rest of the package, is all that is required to negate it. That mind poison is the portrayal of Brian, the Batman copycat. He is portrayed as physically ugly, fat, incompetent and with a ridiculous costume that even Batman disses: “I’m not wearing hockey pads.” He is told by Batman: “Don’t let me find you out here again!” and “I don’t need help!” Wayne later repeats this assertion to Alfred: “That [ie. people like Brian] wasn’t exactly what I had in mind when I said I wanted to inspire people.” Brian is later captured by the Joker and tortured to death, and his corpse is hung from the side of a skyscraper. His death is the most gruesome in the whole movie. And why? Because he was actually trying to follow Batman’s example. So it would seem that the true subconscious message endorsed by Warner Bros. is: “Yes, Batman is cool, but don’t you try emulating him. Not only will your own hero diss you, but you will end up dead.”

The reason for this is simple: if enough people like Brian made the effort, Gotham City could be cleaned up. This, however, would contradict the Gotham City mythos, which insists that Batman fights crime but never ends it. This is why comic-book superheroes (a Jewish creation) are never fully satisfying to the Aryan mind, because the superheroes – despite all the villains they apparently defeat – never actually succeed in creating a better world. Even if superheroes existed in real life, it won’t be them who will create a better world here either, which is why Jews do not mind them being glorified. The people they cannot permit to be glorified are people like Brian, ordinary people who care, and who really can change the world if enough of us united and organized.