http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2011/6/23/surprise-surprise-wilders-is-acquitted-of-inciting-hatred.html

Exactly as we predicted from the very beginning, this whole trial was nothing but a Zionist charade to give defendant Geert Wilders (Jew) even more publicity, to allow defence attorney Bram Moszkovicz (Jew) to show off Jewish domination of the legal system (I’m not even going to bother going over the witness list (Robert Spencer, Raphael Israeli, Sam Solomon … are people blind?) or the suspicious switch of judges halfway through), and finally – in an “Innocent” verdict broadcast live on Dutch TV – to affirm that attacking Muslims is now officially permitted. Jews themselves virtually admit that this was the plan all along:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/145144

Wilders said: “This is not so much a win for myself, but a victory for freedom of speech.” So will we now see him drop his call for the banning of the Koran, or call for the unbanning of Mein Kampf? I think we all know the answer.

The only thing left now to prevent the Ziongasm - carefully and calculatedly built up over the last decade by Jewish media and academia - is personal goodwill on the grassroots level. If you are a Muslim in the Netherlands, do not be intimidated, but simply concentrate on setting a positive example of true Mohammedan conduct in your daily lives. Aryan actions speak louder than Jewish lies or Gentile Ziongasmic groans. When ordinary people see your dignified behaviour compared to the arrogant behaviour of those who attack you, they will hopefully take your side. If you are a non-Muslim in the Netherlands, expect Islamophobia to become a frequent topic of ZC social conversation in gatherings of non-Muslims. This is, however, also where the most effective counterpropaganda can be spread, for if people see you steadfastly defending Muslims even when no Muslims are present, they will know you are sincere rather than merely being polite. The ZCs have gained the ground they have by flaunting the supposed ‘courage’ of their un-PCness, but this is only the brazen sadism of a bully unafraid to pick on a victim now that he knows there will be increasingly few legal consequences for doing so. True courage is to be un-ZC, to defend the innocent and to call out the Gentile bully for what he is:

“Indeed, it is clear from your own history, ancient and modern, that the kuffar of the West – you and your kind – are the most blood-thirsty people in human history.
…
The kuffar of the West – you and your kind – have been responsible for the worst massacres, the worst atrocities, in human history, such as the killing, by the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan, of nearly a quarter of a million people over only a few days.

Therefore, do not presume to lecture us about killing and atrocities.

In addition, the kuffar of the West – you and your kind – have, throughout your history, sought to invade and occupy other lands, and set out to dominate other peoples and to impose your own ways upon them. Thus, the kuffar of the West rampaged throughout Africa, Asia, and North and South America, where – for example – you set about stealing and occupying the lands of the Native American Indians, whom you and your kaffir kind massacred in great numbers. This invasion and occupation, by the kuffar of the West, occurred all over the world. In Australia and New Zealand, for instance, where the land of the indigenous peoples was stolen and appropriated, and where those indigenous peoples were relegated to the status of inferiors, with the kuffar of the West – you and your kind – regarding yourselves as “morally and culturally superior” to everyone else, and demanding the natives “become civilized” and adopt your Western way of life, something which we still hear today. For you regard yourselves and your values as superior to us, and demand we accept your values and become like you, and that we imitate your flawed “democratic system”, or you will use force to change us and make us comply.
…
Therefore, it is utter hypocrisy for the kuffar of the West, for you and your kind, to try and claim some sort of “moral high ground” and to claim that you are only “bringing peace”. Instead, you have brought – and are bringing – only death, injury, suffering, occupation, and military and political domination.
…
For well over a hundred years you and your kind have rampaged across our lands: invading here, occupying there; installing one puppet government after another; supporting one corrupt regime, one corrupt ruler, after another. For well over a hundred years you and your kind have used the threat of military force to get your own way; and, if such threats fail, you will impose economic sanctions, and starve people into submission.
…
In your heart you know us for the people of culture, the people of civilization, the noble warriors, that we are, and that because you know that our unique Way of Life, once established and revealed as a working, living, example for others, reveals your own values and your own way of life for the profane, decadent, ignoble things they are.
…
You are rightly fearful of us, and of the noble truth we represent, for this truth dooms you and your profane dishonourable world.” – David Myatt

http://aryanism.net/politics/anti-zionism-basics

Thank you to Miecz for the excellent graphic at the end of the article.

This page really goes back to where a lot of us started out, and I hope it helps puts things in perspective, especially now that Aryanism is drawing more people who were not involved in the earlier anti-Zionist activism. Note that on the Politics section, I have placed the link right at the top of the Zionist Era subsection, so really this is the page that should sequentially precede Uniting Anti-Zionists, Upgrading Anti-Zionism, etc..

A while ago, I also added a few paragraphs to the Boycott page, so check it out if you haven’t visited that page recently:

http://aryanism.net/about/boycott

Just to give you guys something to read in the meantime, here is a section that Elysium and I had been working on earlier. It is hoped that eventually each subheading will have its own subpage. I was previously planning only to make it public after the whole section was completed, but I guess it doesn’t matter.

If you have content ideas for the subpages, please feel free to submit them:

http://aryanism.net/about/article-submission/

I might not have time to update right now, but I will keep all ideas I receive and eventually do something with them.

This is a trend that I believe can strengthen if Scotland successfully secedes. As I have said in the past, it all comes down to personality type. I have never talked to a serious anti-Zionist who was not also anti-British. The emotion is similar: a simple hatred of bullying and a sense of duty to stand up for the oppressed. Therefore, considering the anti-British emotion in Scotland, there could be considerable untapped anti-Zionist emotion there as well. What we need are Aryanists in Scotland ready to tap into it. Are there any Aryanists in Scotland? We need to hear from you!

Scotland had a decent anti-Zionist representation during the last century. It was to Scotland that Rudolf Hess made his legendary flight for peace in the hope of reaching Douglas Hamilton, a Scottish aristocrat who had been on friendly terms with the NSDAP. Scotland produced author Archibald Maule Ramsay. And then we have this former SNP leader: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Donaldson

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article587207.ece

And Scotland has had for some years an active pro-Palestinian movement. All these can be rechannelled to revive anti-Zionism in the future. But first, and as soon as possible, Scotland must become independent. We should aim to encourage anti-British opinion and support for the SNP’s plan for Scottish independence as widely as possible. (I am not necessarily saying that the SNP itself is 100% trustworthy. What I am saying is that, at the moment, it doesn’t matter.)

Scotland has:

• 25% tidal power generation of EU
• 25% wind power generation of EU
• North Sea oil
• 45% of the British army
• fewer than 7000 Jews out of a population of over 5 million

Combined with a friendly predisposition towards Muslims arising from centuries of living under a common oppressor, an independent Scotland could one day become an anti-Zionist force to be reckoned with as long as it keeps itself free from ZC and BS poison. It is heartening to see that the SDL never gained momentum the way that the EDL did, and this is something in which Scotland should be encouraged to take pride and claim moral high ground over England:

http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/islamophobia-watch/2011/3/1/scottish-defence-league-protest-flops.html

While the rest of Europe continues to deteriorate towards far-right ZC barbarism, I place my hopes for a bastion of honour in Scotland. But again, we need Aryanists or at least anti-Zionists in Scotland on our team. Please step up if you can. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5N0NMzlkuE

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1105/S00323/greece-wave-of-racist-attacks-on-immigrants-in-athens.htm

I’m not even going to waste time ranting about Gentile stupidity. All I am interested in are countermeasures.

Vocabulary:

1) This is not “vigilantism”. Genuine vigilantism – going after organized crime networks that have bought themselves immunity from the police via bribery/blackmail – is noble and heroic. Contrarily, going after random people with dark skin based on a rumour that the initial muggers (who have still not been identified, and for all we know could have been Mossad agents) were “immigrants” is the behaviour of Ziongasm junkies jacking themselves off. Not only does it fail to deal with the original muggers, but it just gives the government an excuse to install more “security measures”.

2) The international Jewish elite is not “pro-immigrant”. They let in immigrants so that Gentiles can beat them up and achieve their Ziongasm, after which they will follow any Zionist puppet who promises to get rid of the immigrants. The evidence for indifference of the authorities towards the welfare of immigrants is seen in that the police, though in the vicinity, were not ordered to stop the attacks. If you are still not convinced, what do you think the Hollywood movie “300″ was if not hardcore Ziongasm porn to prime Gentiles with negative stereotypes towards anything and everything non-Western?

http://swordofelysium.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/persian-demonization-and-perversion-of-aryanism-in-300/

(And long before that we had “The Camp of the Saints” – translated into English by Norman Shapiro (Jew) – again for the purpose of instilling fear and prejudice in the Gentile mind towards immigrants. Can you figure out what is going on?)

If you are someone living in Greece whom local Gentiles might attack on account of how you look:

3) Do not organize a counterattack, but do not be intimidated into leaving either. If you counterattack, the conflict will just escalate. But if you leave, you embolden the Gentiles to launch more attacks, thereby also escalating the conflict. Think militarily. If you counterattack, you are taking the bait. If you leave, you are deserting. Both are beneficial to the enemy. What you should do instead is prepare to defend yourself on the spot should you come under attack. Make it as costly as possible for anyone who would attempt to attack you, and the attackers will be discouraged.

If you are anyone else living in Greece:

4) You too should prepare to defend yourself from attack. Consider that if the original mugging victim had defended himself effectively, he might still be alive (and indeed his attackers might have been either killed on the spot or at least sufficiently incapacitated to be arrested), and the Gentiles would not have had an excuse to go on their racist spree of violence against blameless people in the first place.

No matter who you are:

5) You have a duty to defend any innocent victim of violence that you may encounter, simply because that is what you would want a bystander to do for you if you were the one attacked. Gentile street gangs rely on their numbers, but they are easily outnumbered in any neighbourhood if even a fraction of the people living in that neighbourhood were willing to stand up as a folk to prevent attacks on anyone on their streets. This goes back to the scaled-down community spirit I was talking about earlier: people everywhere need to start thinking of their local neighbourhood as their homeland. If you allow an innocent person to be attacked on your homeland and do nothing about it, you share in the responsibility of the attack. This is the mentality we need. When a neighbourhood is closely knit in this way, it will better resist tribal division even under the stress of chaos. Greece began its civilization as city-states; it is time to get back to that ancient consciousness. If you live in Athens, you are an ATHENIAN (regardless of ancestry) with a duty to defend your fellow ATHENIAN (regardless of ancestry) from attack. Believe it or not, this is what citizenship used to imply when people still had some understanding of honour.

(Jews and Gentiles cannot be Athenians as they do not consider those outside their tribe to be their fellows.)

Protests like these

http://www.kyivpost.com/news/world/detail/104499

accomplish nothing. The government won’t care; their plan all along was to create hostility between groups! And the Gentiles won’t care; they are too dumb to realize they are useful idiots. The only realistic way to stop the attacks is to organize disciplined paramilitary units of local volunteers ready to physically protect the streets whenever any Gentile gang tries to come in and cause trouble. The only realistic way to get such volunteers is to give them at least the rudiments of an ideology that can unite them and motivate them. It takes Diomedes to defeat Ares. It takes Athena to drive Diomedes’ chariot. Aryanists in Greece (are there any?), this is what you should be working on right now.

http://startourstate.com/

As we pointed out previously, Jan Brewer (Jew), can be considered the American equivalent of Geert Wilders (Jew) and other far-right European leaders. She is a backlash surfer, herding people towards another pre-planned ZC revolt in order to siphon energy away from genuine revolution. In which case, this Pima County initiative to secede from Arizona and form a new state called Baja Arizona, in essence a rejection of her backlash surfing, might be something we can work from. I recommend our American Aryanists follow developments of this campaign and see what you can find out. Do we have any Aryanists or at least anti-Zionists in Arizona who can report on this first-hand?

First of all we need to find out if this Start Our State campaign is genuine, or another Jew-backed group. Any information would be appreciated. Why is Alex Jones (ultra disinfo agent) attacking it? If it is genuine, one or more of us should get involved in the discussion and try to encourage the folk idea within it. If it is not genuine, we need not lose hope, as it will still have drawn some well-meaning radicals, whom we could try to get on our side:

http://www.facebook.com/startourstate

Second of all, we need to study the possibilities of equivalent campaigns in other states. If so, ideally we should be trying to start at least one of these campaigns. Here is something that rockstar and Andrew should be working on. If/when the ZCs make their move to start interethnic tribal fights all over America, such campaigns could be invaluable in gathering together the people who reject such stupidity, and who can try to form and defend a network of safe havens (for ALL non-Jews) amid the chaos. If we still have any former New Vinlanders with us, this is what you should be exploring now. Start writing a new constitution on Aryanist principles tailored to local conditions (I will assist you if required); you never know when it might come in handy:

http://goldinthefurnace.blogspot.com/2011/04/platform-for-new-american-state.html

I emphasize that we are not talking about secession of states from the US federal government (except for Hawaii); our enemies already have that base covered. We are talking about secession of sub-states from states, which is much more unpredictable (since there are so many more possibilities) and therefore harder for them to control. It is the same thing with the EU: all the far-right parties calling for pulling member states out of the EU are Zionist front groups; our only hope is pulling a sub-state out of the separate states, such as Scotland from the UK (see previous post).

Aesthetically, the Tucson area seems to have an edge over the Phoenix area by Aryan standards, the former representing the authentic desert landscape, the latter representing an artificial green habitat sustained by ridiculous levels of water – and therefore also energy – consumption. (Don’t we know another place famous for its green lawns while the Palestinians next door don’t have enough water to drink?) Geographical factors are important; low-maintenance areas are more easily made independent than high-maintenance areas.

The big flaw in the current Save Our State rhetoric, of course, is that they are seceding with the intention of rejoining the federal government. But I suspect this will unravel by itself. Our main concern is that, once the undesirability of supporting the federal unit becomes apparent, people still have a third option besides going with the old state unit (which is likely to have become overtly ZC or BS by this time). In this way we at least have a chance to filter the Aryans (who will choose the third option) from the Gentiles (who will choose the ZC/BS option).

In absence of a great spiritual leader to unite us, the next best thing is a scaled-down community to which one can pledge service, and see others do the same, thereby generating at least some measure of rapport between ordinary people stuck in the same crisis. Leaderless resistance might be unrealistic, but leaderless unity is very much worth a try.

“Nobody set me over the people. Grown up among the people, I have ever remained one of the people, and to the people will I return.” – Adolf Hitler

—

(No foppery this time, please; just serious, down-to-earth input. And OC, please stop misrepresenting my views. Disagree with me all you want, but don’t try to warp what I said into what you want me to say or what you want others to think I said.)

Was it Aryanism itself and its mostly English-language content? Of course not, and anyone who thinks we have any level of direct mass influence in our pitiful current condition is utterly delusional. Our message is aimed at the few and high-quality, not at the many and low-quality. We might be able to influence more popularly in the future, but only after we have built a solid core of at least a hundred similar-thinking and actively participating ideologues. (If you want to help us reach this number sooner, please join us!)

http://aryanism.net/blog/information/

http://aryanism.net/blog/information/subsidiaries/

No, I believe that the difference can be attributed to a much simpler emotion beginning to rise in the British Isles (and mostly absent in other European countries) able to trump the ZC emotion of the far-right. The biggest election news of the recent elections is not that the BNP got wiped out, but that the SNP is now an overall majority government in Scotland for the first time. This occurred despite a voting system intended to make it difficult for a single party to dominate elections. What did the SNP offer to the voters that made it so appealing? Answer: a referendum for independence of Scotland from the UK.

Here is something that we as Aryanists can work from. In contrast to the the ZC-prescribed racism-and-Islamophobia reaction to economic failure, this will to secede as an inclusive proto-folk (united by the cause of secession) from the rotten entity of Britain (and hence, implicitly, distance oneself from Britain’s countless atrocities perpetrated all over the world for centuries) is a much healthier and more positive emotion. In the UK, disgust towards Zion is righteously manifested more proximately as disgust towards Britain, particularly towards the British Empire. It puts such people subconsciously on the side of the historical victims of British oppression, including Palestine (former British mandate currently under Zionist occupation), Iraq (former British mandate currently under Zionist occupation), and ultimately National Socialist Germany (we all know what happened here!). On a practical level, it is extremely beneficial to preventing WWIII. Firstly, an independent Scotland sharply reduces the likelihood of future British military campaigns in the Middle East (an effect that could be further strengthened if Wales and Northern Ireland also gained independence). Secondly, an independent Scotland with consequently a more scaled-down and thus more empathic community spirit can better resist Zionist attempts to set ethnic groups against each other, thereby also reducing the likelihood of internal violence. (I have noticed that Scots and Irish are more likely to be friendly towards Muslims in the first place, probably on account of common experience of British oppression. Again, here is something we can build on.) On these observations alone, and with the sleeper potential of a future folk seeking a new ideological direction (e.g. if/when they finally decide to deal with the Jewish infestation in Scotland) which we can then provide them, all Aryanists should support Scottish independence.

“The wealth of Great Britain is the result less of a perfect commercial organisation than of the capitalist exploitation of the three hundred and fifty million Indian slaves. … That’s the strength of the English: to allow the natives to live whilst they exploit them to the uttermost.” – Adolf Hitler

Indeed, to strike while the iron is hot, I recommend activists for Welsh and Northern Irish independence to redouble their efforts at this time, hopefully setting off a domino effect of secessions. In this way, the two-pronged ZC reactionary politics of BNP and UKIP could be defeated the easy way: by change of landscape.

(Don’t think we have outsmarted our enemies yet, however. As I keep reminding everyone, Jews are not stupid, and they have the craft of herding down to a science! Stop underestimating them! Our enemies anticipated this line long ago, and thus control the party known as the English Democrats which is gradually absorbing from the EDL, BNP and UKIP, so that if the secession wave takes off, they can pretend to support it using this group while STILL pushing ZC. So the EDP cannot be supported under any circumstances.)

Nonetheless, the broad idea of tossing out the last vestiges of British bullying as a historically logical (and politically undemanding) warm-up exercise to the final uprising against Israel and international Jewry should definitely be explored further, and in all directions. (This idea as a whole is reminiscent of the idea of a nameless activist who – working from an American perspective – advocated independence for Hawaii and other regions.) Countries such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand, should strengthen calls for ceasing to recognize a British royal as head of state (and, in the case of the latter two, get a new flag without the union symbol). At the same time, the various regions collectively known as the British Overseas Territories:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Overseas_Territories

could also organize initiatives for independence. More imaginatively, a revival of shared anti-British Raj sentiment from their shared history might even be able to ease the hostility between India and Pakistan, while the best way to popularize anti-Zionism in China may be via reminder of the opium trade by the Sassoon (Jew) family (“the Rothschilds of the East”) facilitated by Britain. All these may be symbolic gestures, but they could have a great propaganda effect if actually undertaken in concert. Right now, as evidenced by the attention drawn by last month’s royal wedding, many people worldwide still accord some kind of romantic status towards Britain that – on the intuitive level – prevents them from properly grasping the evils of its treatment of others. It is as if any violence is less reprehensible when Britain is the one committing it, as evidenced in the recent bombing of Libya. (The same is true of Israel, of course.) Therefore the process of de-romanticizing Britain is a propaganda objective whose importance was apparent even to National Socialist Germany, and an objective which remains uncompleted. Let us complete it now and see where it leads us.

“Their empire was built through war, oppression, concentration camps, starvation and blood. …  We have some friendly advice for London. Do not shout so loudly. You are not alone. The whole world is laughing itself to death at pious talk of morality coming from those who reek of blood.” – Joseph Goebbels

Anti-British propaganda of National Socialist Germany

In spite of my intention to expose the faults of Objectivism from first principles, in accordance with Aryanist emphasis on strong ideological foundations and reason as opposed to empirical knowledge and traditional platitudes, I will only deal with the ethical and political parts of Objectivism, and largely ignore its assertions on metaphysics and epistemology. Objectivism is not an isolated phenomenon – it is part of a wider trend of the shallowest kinds of materialism, denying both the existence and importance of the spiritual, which include the Zeitgeist Movement and English Atheism. If I were discussing these, the very fact that their metaphysics are separable from their ethics illuminates an easy path towards exposing them as a shambles. But whereas these other soulless ideologies suppose that what we call ‘Philosophy’ is really two areas of study, one about how we should live and the other about our world, and that the two have nothing to do with each other, Objectivism is unique in this cluster by recognising the intimate links between the two, and therefore must be dealt with differently.

Any ideology worth considering (independently of its possibly odious influence on the world) recognises that the idea of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ as a first principle is completely false. An intelligent, sincere person must believe that there is some personal reason to do good, otherwise ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ become empty notions that can be arbitrarily defined by the environment, hence by existing rulers and culture, degenerating into nothing but a powerful tool for brainwashing.

There is a distinction between selfishness, as practiced by non-Aryans, and a way morality can be derived from how it affects a person without this person being selfish, which I will come to later.

The Objectivists, unlike the Zeitgeist Movement and the Atheists, do have a basis for their morality. Each Objectivist believes that living in a society where others are ‘free’ (by which they mean having ‘freedom of speech’, ‘freedom of association’ and, most importantly to them, living in an unregulated, free-market economy) will benefit himself, because the lack of compulsion on individuals will allow him to feel relaxed and contribute to society according to his own abilities in return for his own reward. There is some truth in this – it is difficult to concentrate when a gun is pointed at you. But this idea should be restricted to just that – concentration. It is difficult to have good ideas if you are a slave, but slavery is a much more practical system for maximising physical labour. Think how many resources can be saved by denying a slave safe working conditions or good housing, or how much longer and harder he can be forced to work at the end of a whip! Here Objectivism begins to fall apart, because in a society where the people who care most about their wealth are the people who occupy the top of the social hierarchy, either they will enslave and dispossess the rest of humanity once they have developed the technology that allows this (Zion) while guaranteeing their own well-being, or they will do this as soon as they can and develop the technology needed to strengthen the system they have created during their own newly acquired leisure time.

The only way this could not happen is if some metaphysical idea were imposed on such people that led them to believe that treating others badly is not in their interests. Certain kinds of reincarnation, for example (and I make no claims here about whether it is real) creates the possibility of, in a future life, becoming the victim you abused. But Objectivism, Atheism and Judaism expound no such creed, and Objectivism, while tolerating religion, encourages Atheism. It makes no difference whether Objectivism makes the claim that such a state of affairs is morally wrong. Put into practice, Objectivism will lead to this state of affairs. Here is the Jewish hallmark we know so well: as with racism, they encourage via action the very thing that they pretend to condemn with words.

Ayn Rand (Alisa Rosenbaum (Jew)) supposedly created Objectivism out of disgust for Communism (itself created by Karl Marx (Jew)). In fairness, Rand did little to acquire wealth in her own lifetime, and it would seem the system was built to satisfy her emotional needs, to create an interpretation of the world after she had abandoned religion to avoid the meaninglessness that follows from this abandonment. However, those who set acquisition of wealth and power as their priority, and those who would be born into wealth under this system, would feel no such disgust (or would be sheltered from the suffering that leads to disgust throughout their lives), and hence would only find a system that is easy to exploit, not having to abide by the ethics it is based on as a result of the liberties it gives them. As we already see happening in our world, they will band together to protect and strengthen their power, disregarding all ethics (since there is no reason to assume morality is common to all or even most), although claiming to act within the boundaries of the law. An Objectivist society would make all of this acceptable to the public, making it incredibly easy to gradually impose Zion. Each new generation, not having the memory of life in the past, would accept the differences from the last generation as natural, necessary, perhaps without ever imagining the possibility of an alternative.

Now, are we seriously supposed to believe that Rand – hardly a fool – genuinely failed to predict this when she created her ideology? Or is it more likely that she knew perfectly well what it would ultimately lead to, yet created it nonetheless, and if so, for whose benefit? (Perhaps a better name for Objectivism would be Objective Zionism.)

The system of slavery that would eventually come about under Objectivism has been the rule, not the exception, in world history, and the application of new technology would only make it more robust than ever before. Beware that, in an Objectivist society, even political parties could not put a stop to this. If the free-market economy could be changed, it would not be an Objectivist society, since it would not be founded on Objectivist principles, so this is not worth considering in our discussion. We are concerned only with the faults of society while it persists along this course.

So much for the practical impossibility of Objectivism, and this is all we need to expose it as erroneous, since it is meant to be a practical system (fully accepting that suffering cannot be avoided), not an ideal. But let us now destroy it completely, and learn a thing or two in the process, by showing it also cannot be a political or ethical ideal. What is an Aryan trying to get out of morality, and how does this different desire make his morality different to an Objectivist’s? The answer is that the Aryan aspires towards perfection, never being happy with the compromises of the world. It is this desire to find ultimate beauty and ultimate sublimation that defines his nobility. He is an alien in his world and despises its limitations.

In contrast, non-Aryans (Gentiles as well as Jews) have accepted the world as it is, turning their back on the ideal and embracing the pragmatic. For them, the ideal is alien and their ‘perfect’ world is merely a world where they do the best they can given existing conditions, and the best person is the person best adapted to these conditions, who is most able to become powerful in this world. Anyone who strives towards true perfection is, from the non-Aryan perspective, wasting their time, because the perfect is unattainable, and pursuing the unattinable is to them a vice, not a virtue.

It is for this reason that Objectivism is odious to the Aryan – it accepts suffering as endemic in the world. The Aryan aspires towards a world where suffering is nonexistent and absurd, and this is why he has high ethical standards – because it is reminder of the ideal world in which he belongs. His action in spite of the compromises of our world shields him from them to a certain extent. When he becomes disgusted with worldly limitations, he does not hoard wealth to improve his own material comfort or try to ‘get on’ in life – this is only for lesser humans who were always (whether because of spiritual or biological limitations) out of touch with the ideal, and who certainly are not fit to be our rulers. (People out of touch with the ideal cannot have true ethics; their apparent ‘ethics’ are either a result of socialisation, rather than being spontaneous, or a lie!) The Aryan has only two options: he ignores the world, becoming an ascetic and contemplating the ideal to escape from material existence, or he wages holy war to purge the world of as much evil as possible.

If Aryans were in leadership, we would use this leadership to bring a transformation of the whole environment. But we who really deserve to wield wealth and power are the opposite of the Objectivist powerbrokers who are most naturally competent at acquiring them. We are also numerically rarer, a small minority compared to the larger class of businessmen in an Objectivist society. Therefore it is all the more imperative that we reject further division according to mundane categories, and instead unite and support each other in practical action.

On the other hand, every one of us must be on our guard against the error that things which approach the ideal are material things that can be bought. Nietzsche believed for a long time in the acquisition of slaves by those capable of constructing an aesthetic ideal so that they could implement power and resources to this end, thus even he accepted too strongly the limitations of our world, advocating cruelty against slaves in the belief that the inevitability of suffering in the world, and the inevitability also of conflict of interests and limited resources meant that it was a waste of time to do otherwise. And, in spite of his theoretical idea that immense power could allow the creation of something similarly great, he had difficulty in defining what it was. He held onto these ideas until he began to take ideals that are very much unattainable in this world seriously (including ignorance of and absurdity of suffering) and hence overcome fixation on the limitations of nature, saying “Kindness is the last victory of the hero over himself.” The man whose noble quest to take life and the arts to new heights was limited by worldly considerations, and who wrote the most callous philosophy of the 19th Century, had his sanity come to an end at the sight of a horse being whipped.

But if followers can participate by contributing to the leader’s vision, there would be no contradiction. There is a contradiction only when blind obedience (in either direction) is involved. The idea here is not blind obedience to power, but agreement of will in working towards a common goal – the folk principle of National Socialism. To even pose the question of whether individual interests should be subordinate to group interests or vice versa is already flawed, because it implies that the motive of each is to indulge itself. The true dichotomy is not individualism vs collectivism, but indulgence vs service. Every non-Aryan ideology is a theory about whose indulgence should be prioritised and what form the indulgence should take. Only after discarding indulgence altogether, in favour of service, does the Aryan discussion begin.

I also regret to inform our team members that Elysium has left us. He told me of his decision last week, and I asked if he wanted to announce his departure himself, but having not heard back from him so far, I thought I would let everyone know the news in brief first. If he wishes to elaborate, he is more than welcome to do so. As far as I could tell, he still believes in our ideas, but he wants to concentrate on life outside of online activism. Please leave your well wishes for him in the comments.

I will have to adjust to the sudden loss of a very good teammate indeed. Elysium was the one with whom, to date, I have worked longest and most closely in this propaganda war. He was invariably the first person I went to when I wanted an opinion. What I liked most about him was that he always kept Aryanism down-to-earth, which is the way it should be and must be in order to win the support of the kind of people we want: not fops, not academics, not dilettantes, but earnest souls whose attraction to Aryanism and National Socialism is based on serious concern towards serious problems in the world.

“National Socialism is not a cult-movement – a movement for worship; it is exclusively a folkist political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship…. We will not allow mystically-minded occultists with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement. Such are not National Socialists, but something else – in any case something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our programme there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief.” – Adolf Hitler

I should also mention that most of the activism of Aryanism is actually done behind the scenes, via private correspondences, and this is where Elyisum’s contribution was greatest. You may not have seen him much on the blog, but he was always working backstage. Now that I will have to take over this aspect as well, I am afraid main site updates may become much slower.

Right now I am just sorting stuff out. Elysium and I had compiled a long list of ideas for content that has yet to be produced. On top of this, I also have a bunch of leftover ideas from the nameless activist that have yet to be produced. Over time, I will probably release most of these as delegations (expect Gold In The Furnace to seriously fill up) and just hope for the best. More than ever we need more new people stepping up to the plate. We know you are out there, and we need your help.

If you are an Aryanist who does not like blogging but are good at admin and online networking, especially on YouTube, and you wish to help lighten my load, please let me know and I will give you plenty to do!

In case this post sounds too depressing, please look forward to new contributor Anthony’s refutation of Objectivism next post, coming soon!

Learn to spot reptilian faces! 

http://israel.thejview.com/religion/mazal-tov-prince-william-and-kate-middletons-jewish-wedding

As depressing as it is to see how more people are interested in a Zionist royal wedding than in the worst nuclear disaster in history and the Zionist bombing of Libya and aggravation of Syria, I might as well use the publicity to mention a related subject.

I have nothing to say about William Battenberg Windsor and Kate Goldsmith Middleton that you do not already know. Even the commenters in the linked article get it. By the way, as Aryanists, NEVER refer to non-Aryan dynasts by their titles. This is the image you should have in mind when you see them:

Which one is William?

But this is a good day to revisit the assassination of Princess Diana, which plenty of other anti-Zionists have suspected to be a Zionist hit.

The more popular conspiracy theories talk about the MI5/MI6 and speculate that either Charles or Elizabeth gave the order, with no mention of Jews, but of course that is the equivalent of blaming the CIA, Bush and Cheney for 9/11. It is obvious that the MI[insert number here] is subservient to the Mossad. So it doesn’t matter who executed it; the main suspicion is that Israel wanted it done. The only question is why, and the answer is simple:

“Diana intended to start a campaign in a Palestinian refugee camp in Gaza or the West Bank.” – Nicholas Davies

“This misery must come to an end, these children must no longer live under such conditions.” – Diana Spencer

Jews have a pattern of getting rid of all people of outstanding charisma who stand against them, from John F. Kennedy to Michael Jackson. Diana was another of these. The key was not her upcoming marriage to Dodi Fayed in itself, but her intentions to do charity work in Palestine following her marriage. She would have been a living symbol of the Christian-Mohammedan unity that we are now still trying to get off the ground! And with her worldwide popularity, she could have singlehandedly moved her fans all over the world behind Palestine and against Israel. All she would have had to do was appear on camera with a Palestinian child victim of IDF violence, and Israel could have been finished off the same way apartheid South Africa was finished off. Was this the threat they saw and tried to prevent?

Imagine if this were a Palestinian baby whose parents had been killed by the IDF. Do you think Israel would still exist today?

Eventually, it took Rachel Corrie (whom the Zionists also killed) to get the message out, but this was after 9/11, therefore much less effective than what Diana could have done in the late 1990s when Islamophobia did not even exist. Timing matters.

(Let us think about this last point for a minute. The 90s wasn’t that long ago. The ZCs make it sound as though Muslims have been incapable of integrating into society since forever, when the reality – trivially accessible from our own first-hand memories of less than 20 years ago – was that Muslims were fully integrated back in the 90s! I’ve had Muslim classmates, neighbours, coworkers, I shopped at their businesses, I did training with them; back in those days they were viewed as just ordinary people like the rest of us. There was no prejudice, no stereotyping, no negativity of any kind. It is mind-boggling to think that, for non-Aryans, ZC propaganda can override even first-hand memories. I recommend that we incorporate into our counterpropaganda elements that encourage people to remember society in the 90s; a simple recollection that we HAD BEEN getting along fine until recently would destroy the ZC lie that it is “impossible” for different groups to get along, and might help society try harder to get along again.)

In any case, the main point about the Diana assassination is that those historically killed by Jews have a tendency of becoming legends that inspire even more people against Jewish domination; this has been the case from Jesus (crucified) through Mohammed (poisoned) to Hitler (entire country bombed). Let us count Diana among our anti-Zionist martyrs, and she too might yet become another ghost to haunt our enemy.

There are rumours of a protest planned to occur on the day of the Jewish wedding. To the protestors, if they are genuine, I have a friendly suggestion. Do not make it about any other issue (which will just play into ZC spin), but make it about calling for the killers of Diana and Dodi to be brought to justice. Otherwise, don’t do a protest at all, as you will just make things worse.

Gentiles hate Diana and call her “race traitor”, “Muzzie-lover” and all the other usual vacuous insults. (Funnily enough, Gentiles also hate JFK, MJ, etc.. Is it coincidence that Jews and Gentiles hate so many of the same people?) Aryans should be thankful that Diana was one of the extremely few individuals from the old upper-class establishment whose heart at least was in broadly the right place. Diana might not have been as well-informed as many others who threatened Jewish domination enough to be assassinated, but she followed her basic feelings of empathy for the oppressed and belief in a better world for all, and that alone was enough to frighten the Zionists. Any other world-famous individual want to pick up this torch?

In the meantime, it is up to us ordinary people to keep the momentum going. Let us all welcome our newest team member, Progisby:

http://unipax.wordpress.com

Anyone else with a new Aryanist blog, please add your link in the comments! By the way, does anyone know what happened to Marduniya?