The last word on Marxism

I recently added a link to this page on the main site:

http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-communism/

but I feel it is important enough to also post here for extra emphasis, the reason being that over the years I have been (as regular readers will have surely witnessed) slandered as a “Marxist”/”communist” more times than I can count, both by sundry uneducable useful idiots and by occasional deliberately trolling Zionist agents, whereas I myself have been insisting the entire time that the racist far-right are the true Bolsheviks of the 21st century, also on this page:

http://aryanism.net/politics/multiethnic-society/is-race-the-new-class/

and in many blog comments (not to mention at times having to resort to pointing at pop culture Soviet caricatures such as Ivan Drago(!) and Zangief(!!) to get my point across…..)

Finally, a renowned Marxist scholar has taken the trouble to write an article which, in effect, declares me to have been correct all along and those who call today’s leftists “Marxists”/”communists” to have never had the slightest clue what they are talking about. He himself is significantly sympathetic to the Alt-Right, which just further rests my case as to where 21st century Bolshevism is to be found:

https://storia.me/en/@dubya/marx-would-line-today-3zz8b5

Marx Would Line Today’s Leftists Up Against the Wall and Shoot Them

Slavoj Zizek, the world’s most famous living Marxist theorist, wrote an interesting column in the Independent the other day. He defended the alt-right and populist right-wing figures like Steve Bannon by saying that they represent a genuine form of class consciousness, in other words they understand that their primary enemies are the bourgeois globalist elite who currently control the establishment of both parties.

In Marxist thought, the lumpenproletariat are proletarians (that is: workers) who lack class consciousness … Black Lives Matter activists are often deployed against the alt-right and other working class whites to instill violence and shut down their pro-worker rallies — does this not make Black Lives matter the very definition of lumpenproles?

As for the LGBT movement, … they focus exclusively on homosexuality, transsexuality, and other non-hetero sexualities that were illegal in most Marxist countries because they were considered a form of bourgeois sexual deviancy. And judging by today’s society, it seems the Marxists were right about that. …

Immigrant rights groups, which represent a powerful faction within today’s left, don’t give a damn about worker’s issues. …

Lastly, we have violent far-left groups like Antifa and By Any Means Necessary (BAMN). Who are they made up of? Go into any working class community and try to find a chapter of either of these groups — good luck.

This, overall, holds true for the rest of the left: none of them have a class consciousness, they are all either rich boujee kids from the suburbs or lumpenproletariat who have been fooled into believing that hating whitey or straight people is more important than class struggle. If anything, if a modern Marxist revolution actually happened in the West, all of these groups would be lined up against the wall and shot as traitors to class struggle. So how could any truly class-conscious movement like the alt-right or the populist right take the modern left seriously?

You may recall that I made virtually the same assertion long ago when I invited readers to imagine what Stalin or Mao would think of today’s leftists. Frankly, it’s not a difficult thought experiment.

The most important thing to remember is that Hitler, who should indeed be remembered  for his fight against Marxism, was fighting against the real Marxism as is accurately depicted by the above article, not what Red Pill junkies erroneously call “Marxism” today. It is precisely those useful idiots who imagine that Hitler was fighting against Red-Pill-hallucinatory ”Marxism” who necessarily presume that Hitler’s ideology was the same as neo-Nazism. On the other hand, it is those who understand that Hitler was fighting against the real Marxism who have an easier time beginning to understand authentic National Socialism.

In short, I wholly agree with the title of the linked article: yes, Marx would line today’s leftists up against a wall and shoot them. I only add: fortunately, Hitler would shoot Marx before Marx could shoot today’s leftists.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

101 Responses to The last word on Marxism

  1. It’s amazing how this site is getting proven right as times and events go by.

  2. Steven says:

    Nice, I always appreciated the link to Marxism that you gave to the ethno-Bolshevikism. I recently mentioned again a thought I had a while back to do a parody of the Communist Manifesto as the WN Manifesto that would finish, “Whites of the World, Unite!” and basically show how parallel WN really is to Marxism, and somehow also could make clear how National Socialism really is anti-WN just as it was anti-Marxist back in the day…

    By the way, hopefully Pandorastop will get about writing to you, AS, and to JJ too, as I would really like to hear back from JJ especially about the Pacific Pivot. Seeing as we really want to actually move forward and see something happen, and I am the leader of our Party in Australia whether you emotionally like that or not, I really hope that his efforts for reconciliation can produce fruit. Maybe we don’t have to continue our futile war? Maybe Hess this time can achieve the aims of his Fuhrer, and we can stand once again united on the same side? Anyway, whatever God in heaven wants to come about, we’ll see…

  3. @Fatih Dion says:

    So people like Lauren Cohen, eh sorry Southern, and Star of….. David Duke is just Commie dumbass need to get shot on their head

  4. Pandorastop says:

    @Steven

    “By the way, hopefully Pandorastop will get about writing to you, AS, and to JJ too, as I would really like to hear back from JJ especially about the Pacific Pivot. Seeing as we really want to actually move forward and see something happen, and I am the leader of our Party in Australia whether you emotionally like that or not.”

    Yes, I did write to AS. About many things.

  5. anon says:

    I am not going to defend Zizek because he seems to believe in rather naive accelerationism “the worse, the better”, but I am going to defend marxism.

    It’s silly that in order to disgust marxism you had to cite an article written not only by someone who probably is alt-right, but who also have very poor understanding on what marxism is.
    Because if he had read Marx himself, he’d found that Marx would certainly stand with BLM and immigrants (just like today’s marxists do). It’s not, as author suggests, that class-related issues are The Only True problems, while identity issues are only divisive (let’s put aside the fact that identity is also constituted by socioeconomic relations). They are both results of capitalism. Marx once wrote about the racism of English workers towards the Irish, where he said that it is the English’s job to overcome artifical antagonism kept alive by the ruling classes in order to make a united working class movement. Therefore, it is plausible that Marx would say the same about BLM, immigrants etc.: it is the white’s job (as they occupy a relatively higher position) to overcome artifical antagonisms, and not underprivileged groups to submit to whites, risking marginalization in the process.

    If he had read Marx himself, he’d found that while Marx was privately not very fond of homosexuals (the “he was a man of it’s time” argument), there is nothing in the theoretical core of marxism to support a position of oppression towards them. On the contrary, Marx wanted to abolish “burgeois family”, which could mean that in it’s abscence a various new forms of non-patriarchal, non-hetero, non-cis etc. families would emerge. Besides, there is a political evidence: it was the bolsheviks who first in the world decriminalised homosexuality (and abolished age of consent), in 2nd Lenin’s cabinet there was a first (?) outed homosexual minister, and Alexandra Kollontai wrote a lot about feminist stuff. The fact that under Stalin it had all gone away means that it was a departue of marxism, rather it’s true realization.
    And so on, and so on…
    In short – the author doesn’t know shit about marxism and shouldn’t be used as an authority as to what marxists believe.

    “The most important thing to remember is that Hitler, who should indeed be remembered for his fight against Marxism, he was fighting against the real Marxism”

    And yet he sincerely allied with these “real marxist” Soviet state, and no one in Third Reich said anything against it…

  6. Steven says:

    @Pandorastop – Thanks brother… Much appreciated. May the Force be with you :)

  7. Fatih Dion says:

    @anon

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_under_communism

    1. Marx was homo-phobic

    2. Gay men were sometimes denied membership or expelled from communist parties[13] across the globe during the 20th Century, as most communist parties followed the social precedents set by the USSR. However, this was not the case in the West.

    3. Association of fascism with homosexuality by communists

    In the early 1920s western communist party leaders propagated the view that the increase in homosexuality and the open discussion of homosexuality were caused by capitalism “in its death throes”. In their view, homosexuality would vanish.[6]

    After Hitler’s seizure of power (the Machtergreifung), Marxist intellectuals correlated fascism with homosexuality.[6] Soviet writer Maxim Gorky remarked, “Exterminate all homosexuals and fascism will vanish.”[23] (!!!!!!!)

    4. Connections between gay rights groups and radical leftists were not merely a figment of the imaginations of demagogues. The Mattachine Society, one of the earliest gay rights groups in the United States, was founded by Harry Hay, a former member of the Communist Party USA, who was kicked out of the gay rights group he’d founded for his ties to the party.[30]

    5. Famous ex-communist former Soviet agent Whittaker Chambers notably spent his time in the left-wing underground pursuing both homosexual and heterosexual affairs, but he kept his liaisons quiet since his communist associates despised homosexuality.[31][32] Chambers later monogamously married the pacifist painter Esther Shemitz, working as a journalist and editor.

    6. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its Leader Gennady Zyuganov supported a ban on the “promotion of non-traditional sexual relations to minors”,[40][41] mostly named a ban on “homosexual propaganda to minors” in Western media.[42]

    7. Most countries that against homosexuality is former Communist country (Eastern Europe)

    8. And learn actual and authentic Communist in Eastern Europe where it began to power, not Western Europe and others, the Communist people use homosexuality to attack Western European people for making Communist into popularity

  8. Gerulf says:

    @anon

    >The fact that under Stalin it had all gone away means that it was a departure of marxism, rather it’s true realization.

    I don’t speak for this site, but I hear this excuse all the time. “It’s not the system that’s flawed, but the people.” That’s the same excuse Catholics use to defend the actions of the Church: the inquisitions, burning of witches, jesuitism, and wars.

    Stalin did not make such a radical departure from what Lenin laid down. By usurping Trotsky, he put himself in a position to steer the Bolshevik revolution on a slightly more realistic course. Under Trotsky, the movement would have probably ended up worse. I’d actually prefer Stalin over Churchill or Roosevelt. He was a man of character who even Hitler acknowledged.

  9. anon says:

    @Gerulf
    I am not a defender of a Soviet system, be it Leninst or Stalinist variation, and I was talking specifically about homosexuality, so I insist on a departure on that issue because as I argued:
    - Marx didn’t support traditional family
    - Marx didn’t write anything about sexuality in capitalism, and saying that homosexuality is supposedly modern, bourgeois decadence even when it’s the bourgeois who criminalized homosexuality everywhere in the world is complete rubbish
    - early communist parties and early Soviet state weren’t against homosexuality

    So one must conclude that unfortunate treatment of LGBT people in XXth century communist regimes was a result of various historical and sociopolitical forces and factors (leftovers of the previous system), and not an inevitable outcome of Marx’ thought. After all, who wasn’t homophobic at that time? Today, at least in Europe and Americas, almost every marxist or communist movement is pro-LGBT. Even Fidel Castro apologized for persecution in Cuba.

  10. John Johnson says:

    @Steven
    “I really hope that his efforts for reconciliation can produce fruit.”

    If you sincerely desire reconciliation, the burden of action rests squarely upon your shoulders Steven, not mine.

    You’ve been given multiple opportunities to reconcile with our movement yet rebuffed us every time. I’m not going to try to lasso you back into this movement when you yourself do not seem to want to commit yourself to being a team member and make the necessary concessions of ego which membership in any organized movement requires.

  11. AS says:

    @Daniel

    “It’s amazing how this site is getting proven right as times and events go by.”

    Meanwhile on the archaeology front:

    http://www.newsweek.com/ancient-china-colossal-waterway-system-built-5000-year-old-liangzhu-730351

    @Steven

    “I am the leader of our Party in Australia”

    If you lead it, it is by definition not our party.

    “Maybe we don’t have to continue our futile war?”

    Declare that Hypnotix was correct and you were incorrect about everything here:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/summer-cleaning/comment-page-1/#comment-176149

    apologize to NS for this:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175500

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175502

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-5/#comment-175523

    and apologize to our entire team for this:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/tribute-to-lavin-eskandar/comment-page-4/#comment-175459

    I am not the one begging you to come back; you are the one begging to be let back in.

    @anon

    “Marx once wrote about the racism of English workers towards the Irish, where he said that it is the English’s job to overcome artifical antagonism kept alive by the ruling classes in order to make a united working class movement. Therefore, it is plausible that Marx would say the same about BLM, immigrants etc.: it is the white’s job (as they occupy a relatively higher position) to overcome artifical antagonisms, and not underprivileged groups to submit to whites, risking marginalization in the process.”

    But this is not what today’s leftists promote. Today’s leftists argue that “liberal whites” are only creating confusion by apparently speaking up for BLM etc.. This is equivalent to our position regarding so-called “anti-Zionist Jews” who apparently speak up for Palestinians etc.. In fact, in an encouraging development (as a direct consequence of our activism), today’s leftists increasingly refuse to let Jews speak up for BLM etc. either. So today’s leftists would still not be Marxists even according to what you claim Marx might say.

    “non-patriarchal”

    “Favorite quality: in man – Strength; in woman – Weakness.” – Karl Marx (replying to his own daughters)

    If this is not patriarchy, I don’t know what is.

    “in 2nd Lenin’s cabinet there was a first (?) outed homosexual minister, and Alexandra Kollontai wrote a lot about feminist stuff. The fact that under Stalin it had all gone away means that it was a departue of marxism, rather it’s true realization.”

    But the USSR that Hitler conisidered necessary to invade was Stalin’s USSR.

    “And yet he sincerely allied with these “real marxist” Soviet state, and no one in Third Reich said anything against it…”

    The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was a neutrality pact, not an alliance. And if it was sincere, Hitler wouldn’t have invaded shortly after.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

  12. Steven says:

    Numinous Sun and I have no issues between each other… Many people in our team actually understand where I am coming from, as you would come to know for yourself if you came to the Discord one in a while… Anyway, I am not begging to come back. I am just wishing you would stop being such an idiot… You talk about wanting to do something positive, yet you continue to be an idiot… If that’s what you want, then so be it. See you in the Kingdom…

  13. anon says:

    @AS
    “Today’s leftists argue that “liberal whites” are only creating confusion by apparently speaking up for BLM etc..”

    Yes, “liberal whites” are creating confusion. “Leftist whites” probably not. So what’s your point? Also I don’t think it’s true that the left is refusing Jews or anyone else to speak againt Israeli racism.

    “If this is not patriarchy, I don’t know what is.”

    Marx could have had also beat his wife and it wouldn’t matter to marxism – which is a theoretical corpus of thought separated from the private person of Karl Marx. He, as a public figure, should be judge first and foremost by his public writings. Also I am surpised you didn’t cite this:
    [i]“Your favourite dish – Fish”[/i]

    “But the USSR that Hitler conisidered necessary to invade was Stalin’s USSR.”

    So was Stalin’s USSR marxist or non-marxist?

    “The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was a neutrality pact, not an alliance.”

    Yes, neutrality pact where they agreed to partition of Poland and other territorial changes of Europe…

    “And if it was sincere, Hitler wouldn’t have invaded shortly after.”

    Hitler invaded because he found out that Stalin was going to invade him.

  14. Fatih Dion says:

    @anon

    “So was Stalin’s USSR marxist or non-marxist?”

    Marxism is the theory and Communism is the practical implementation of Marxism, while Marxism is a political ideology based on Karl Marx’s ideas, communism can be called as a political system, which is based on Marxist ideology.

    Eastern European (Stalinist) and Chinese Communist (Maoist), once again, is actual Communist

    Read more: Difference Between Communism and Marxism | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/miscellaneous/difference-between-communism-and-marxism/#ixzz50QbMTzvr

    “Yes, “liberal whites” are creating confusion. “Leftist whites” probably not. So what’s your point?

    The most important point is that the liberal white (Left-wing) is still care with other ethnic that still persecuted or discriminated, which is contrary to Marxist thought, which is more concerned with the indigenous ethnic proletariat inside the country

    They are potential to be Authentic National Socialist group

    “Also I don’t think it’s true that the left is refusing Jews or anyone else to speak againt Israeli racism.”

    And by the way, Jews also infiltrate right wing groups, so both wing is already poisoned, we need to infiltrate and correct the Left into true way

  15. Amaleq says:

    Let’s also not forget that Marx was funded by the Rothschild international banking family….

    Marxists should really ask themselves why a communist revolutionary was being funded by a capitalistic banking family?

  16. @Fatih Dion says:

    @anon

    “Marx could have had also beat his wife and it wouldn’t matter to marxism – which is a theoretical corpus of thought separated from the private person of Karl Marx. He, as a public figure, should be judge first and foremost by his public writings. ”

    Look Eastern Europe and China, that formerly Communist countries, they are strongly oppose homosexuality, anti-foreigners and preserve tradition

    For example, this is how homosexuality was banned in China

    For most of the 20th century, homosexual sex was banned in the People’s Republic of China until it was legalized in 1997. In 2001, homosexuality was removed from the official list of mental illnesses in China.[7]

    Homosexuality in China is banned during Communist regime

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_China

    Homo-phobic = Judaic

  17. RP says:

    @anon
    “Also I don’t think it’s true that the left is refusing Jews or anyone else to speak againt Israeli racism.”

    I beg to differ: https://youtube.com/watch?v=IDguUZEG8ZA
    @8:32
    “The Jewish community has kept alive the myth that they have solidarity with the black community”

  18. AS says:

    @anon

    ““liberal whites” are creating confusion. “Leftist whites” probably not.”

    Now you are creating confusion! True Leftists do not self-identify as “white”. “Leftist whites” are therefore False Leftists a.k.a. liberals.

    In the same way that sincere anti-Zionists will not excuse Jewish identity, sincere anti-racists will not excuse “white” identity.

    “Also I am surpised you didn’t cite this:
    [i]“Your favourite dish – Fish”[/i]”

    If you had tried to argue that Marxism is universalist rather than merely humanist, I would have done so. I am glad that you did not.

    “Western Free Thought … has never preached or even conceived a love more comprehensive than that of humanity. And every one of its aspects, from Descartes to Karl Marx, is as man-centered as any philosophy can be.” – Savitri Devi

    “Hitler invaded because he found out that Stalin was going to invade him.”

    Hitler’s plan to conquer Soviet territory was formulated long before the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed:

    3 February 1933, at his initial meeting with the generals and admirals of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler said that the conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe, and its “ruthless Germanisation”, were the ultimate geopolitical objectives of Reich foreign policy.[42] That the USSR was the country to provide sufficient Lebensraum for the Germans, because it possessed much agricultural land, and was inhabited by Slavic Untermenschen (sub-humans) ruled by Jewish Bolshevism.[43]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum#Foreign-policy_prime_directive

  19. anon says:

    @AS
    “Now you are creating confusion! True Leftists do not self-identify as “white”. “Leftist whites” are therefore False Leftists a.k.a. liberals.”

    I thought it should be obvious I was referring to common-sense definition of “white” – as a skin color.

    “If you had tried to argue that Marxism is universalist rather than merely humanist, I would have done so. I am glad that you did not.”

    I believe it was Lenin who, when asked about what part of marxism should we be critical of, replied: “everything!”

    “Hitler’s plan to conquer Soviet territory was formulated long before the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed:”

    Aren’t we supposed to look behind curtains of propaganda and mere words and see not what leaders says, but what they do? And the “do” part in this case consist of:
    - a real military and economic alliance between Third Reich and USSR
    - armament aimed at UK (construction of monstrous fleet under “Plan Z”) and not Soviets (lack of proper equipment was crucial in Germany’s defeat in Operation Barbarossa)
    - the actual military plan to attack USSR was not made until 1940
    - even Hitler himself in Mein Kampf says that the most dangerous thing for Germany is to wage war on two fronts. Yet he exactly did that, because he realized Stalin tricked him.

    Of course I am sure Hitler wanted to see the fall of USSR. But that would have been a long-term goal, perhaps during turmoil after Stalin’s death?

  20. @Fatih Dion says:

    @anon

    “armament aimed at UK (construction of monstrous fleet under “Plan Z”) and not Soviets (lack of proper equipment was crucial in Germany’s defeat in Operation Barbarossa)”

    Hitler have mixed opinion on British people, he hate most of them but also have some admiration to them, so the later conclusion he just want to force British people to surrender trough disarm their military power so he can make peace deal with them and together destroying Communist

    “the actual military plan to attack USSR was not made until 1940″

    Hitler’s primary enemy is Communist, even Stalin did not desire to attack Western Europe, Hitler still will invade Eastern Europe for terminate Communist ideology

    “even Hitler himself in Mein Kampf says that the most dangerous thing for Germany is to wage war on two fronts. Yet he exactly did that, because he realized Stalin tricked him.”

    Actually, French and British that make Hitler’s hope fail

  21. AS says:

    @anon

    “I thought it should be obvious I was referring to common-sense definition of “white” – as a skin color.”

    These skin colours (compare them with the shirts, which are actually white) are referred to as “white” in mainstream parlance:

    http://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/314557/kevin-carroll.jpg

    https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.BZt6CF3aoBaQRiUlgYflPwD6D6

    https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAe8AAAAJDY3NDllMTkyLTNiNWQtNDY3Ni05NjgyLWRjY2YyZjM5ZDI5Mw.jpg

    And lest we forget (compare with the background):

    http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2864b737c9fc6e5f09499cfd9bb1f193

    For that matter, even one of our favourite people (compare with the shirt again) can be respectfully used as an example:

    https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.MgEn7-m9N4Mzc3yQgJxuPwC0D5

    Meanwhile, this skin colour (compare with the shirt collar) is referred to as “non-white” by the same people who think of the above skin colours as “white”:

    https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2451/3619372267_c112fcc1ab.jpg

    “Common-sense definition”??????? Or Eurocentric definition? (For the record, I am emphatically NOT suggesting re-defining the skin colour in the last picture as “white” either, because that would still be optically inaccurate (even if somewhat less so).)

    “To be “white” in the first place requires a suspension of objective reality; you have to willingly deceive yourself to accept the membership card for the “White Club.” You have to look in the mirror and see a complexion that is nowhere near white and say, “I’m white,” and it is at that point that you’re ready to believe anything else no matter how absurd.” – JAM

    One last picture:

    https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/L1UiVxasDNZL8DWMSJeXzH8cau0=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/assets/4240707/158574127.jpg

    To believe that the skin is nearer in colour to the shirt than to the necktie is no less insane than to believe that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel or indeed that Israel should be allowed to exist at all, or that North Korea/Muslims/refugees/etc. are the bad guys, or that Western civilization does not need to die ASAP.

  22. Jesse Starfall says:

    I believe it is definitely worth noting the difference between Classical Marxism and Cultural Marxism here. People simply call it “Marxism” rather than what they actually mean: “Cultural Marxism”. The “Critical Theory” coming out of the Frankfurt School took the foundations of class struggle that Karl Marx had laid out and applied it in a different fashion. Modern day Cultural Marxism simply puts the (perceived) oppressed up against the (perceived) oppressors. It puts the minority against the majority. It will take group identities, whether it be based on religion, culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., and use those identities to pit groups against one another. It’s identity politics turned up to 11.

  23. Amaleq says:

    @Jesse Starfall:

    “It puts the minority against the majority.”

    So does Aryanism.net. Veganism is also a minority movement in all countries?

    “Modern day Cultural Marxism simply puts the (perceived) oppressed up against the (perceived) oppressors.”

    What would be wrong with that?

    “It puts the minority against the majority. It will take group identities, whether it be based on religion, culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., and use those identities to pit groups against one another. It’s identity politics turned up to 11.”

    Jewish democracy in general?

  24. Jesse Starfall says:

    @Amaleq

    The Vegan movement is noble, so is the cause of destroying oppressors. What is being done through Cultural Marxism however, is pointless bickering (although it often escalates beyond mere “bickering”) over non-issues, designed to pit people against one another as a distraction. This keeps people’s eyes on each other rather than on taking down Zionism. People wage wars about things like gender, or sexual orientation, as if those things will make a difference.

  25. Fatih Dion says:

    Sad, most of people now dont have many Aryan blood memory, they more care about themselves (Tribalist Gentilism), only 1 from 5 people in each society that have Aryan blood memory

  26. AS says:

    @Jesse

    “Modern day Cultural Marxism simply puts the (perceived) oppressed up against the (perceived) oppressors.”

    Yes, but how is this even remotely comparable to class struggle, which is based on wealth-makers against wealth-beneficiaries? If anything, is not the rightist narrative which stereotypes “non-whites” as “lazy welfare recipients/cushy public sector quota hire fillers” and “whites” (especially “white” males) as “Promethean innovators and Faustian problem-solvers without whom civilization would collapse within 24h” more comparable to the bourgeois vs prole dichotomy as Marx envisioned it?

    I understand what Critical Theory is; I am just saying it is superlatively ridiculous to call it “Cultural Marxism”. A vision of the oppressed rising against the oppressors is more similar to Christianity:

    “Woe unto the hunters for they shall become the hunted.” – Jesus

    whereas Marx wanted to abolish Christianity. So if rightists want to be more accurate, they should rename Critical Theory as Cultural Christianity. (Of course they don’t, because they think Christianity is on their side, when what is actually on their side is JUDEO-Christianity.)

    “It puts the minority against the majority.”

    Which is not what Marx envisioned at all. Marx was perfectly aware that proles outnumber bourgeois, so his vision was always of the majority acting against the minority.

    “It will take group identities, whether it be based on religion, culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., and use those identities to pit groups against one another.”

    But does it? Does Critical Theory encourage conflict between Muslims and LGBTs, for example? Or between women and ethnic minorities? No, it does not. On the contrary, it encourages all these groups to stand together against the oppressor category.

    Our True Left criticism of (False Left) Critical Theory is that it attempts to promote unification among the oppressed without calling for de-emphasizing these denominations, which ensures that they will FAIL to stand together against the oppressor category (and we believe it was designed by Zionists to fail, in order that the right-wing backlash can then succeed).

    Another True Left criticism is that (False Left) Critical Theory categorizes Jews as an oppressed group rather than as an oppressor group, which is absurd. I am proud to say that we are already being listened to on this point, and leftists today are increasingly re-classifying Jews into the oppressor category.

    _____

    NOTICE

    The purpose of our uniform system is to let visitors know which commenters are authorized to represent our movement and which are not. Any commenter wearing a fake uniform will have their comments put into the spam folder. E.g.:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/fake-uniform.jpg

  27. Nexion 352 says:

    @everyone

    What do you guys think about the recent down fall of ISIS? Since they have been declared practically removed from Syria. Should all the refugees go back to Syria? Although most are not from Syria but still quite a few are. If they do return what would be the next best route to the destruction of western civilization/

  28. Amaleq says:

    @Nexion 352:

    “What do you guys think about the recent down fall of ISIS? Since they have been declared practically removed from Syria. Should all the refugees go back to Syria? Although most are not from Syria but still quite a few are. If they do return what would be the next best route to the destruction of western civilization?

    How will the world feed itself in 40 years’ time?
    https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/oct/11/how-will-the-world-feed-itself

    “The world is going to get hungrier this century, and on a scale that will make the famines of the 1980s look paltry. The math’s are simple and devastating: in 40 years’ time the global population will be 9.2 billion people – a third larger than it is now. But to feed us all, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization says, we will need to produce twice as much food….”

    “…If the world develops as economists predict, it is hard to see how we can possibly meet these demands: environmentalists like to say that the 2050 population would require the resources of two earths to sustain it. No wonder the British government’s chief scientific adviser John Beddington says: ‘Food security represents a greater threat to mankind than climate change itself….’”.

    The prognosis isn’t good if you ask me, and we’re running out of time….

    “Anyone who believes in infinite economic growth on a finite planet is either a madman, or an economist.” — David Attenborough

    It’s not hard for me to imagine what Judeo-Greco-Christian civilization is going to do if climate change, food, and water, crisis predictions prove to be accurate, or worse prove to have been conservative….

    We can thank Jews too for the fact that we now have nukes on board this sinking boat….

  29. Amaleq says:

    Speak of the devil:

    “He protec #trump #america”
    https://www.minds.com/media/787257190195924992

    LOL!

  30. Amaleq says:

    #protectrump

    :)

    When I lived in England ‘trump’ used to mean the same thing as ‘toot’ does in America, I know that much….

    America: You Can’t Have A President Called Donald Fart
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/beckybarnicoat/america-you-know-a-trump-is-a-fart-in-britain-right?utm_term=.nqGKl7pOA#.psWOZrodk

    Yes you can apparently.
    Now that’s irony! lol!

  31. Nexion 352 says:

    @Amaleq

    “How will the world feed itself in 40 years’ time?”

    They have been claiming over population will kill us for some time. First it was 3 billion then 6 billion. Both of these populations were supposedly unsustainable at some point. I personally do not believe the pop is 7.5 billion, but 10 billion is not unsustainable in my opinion if you consider what china has done. Oh I see you mean the over population will cause a less western civilization. If it was the jewish plan to over populate then what is the point of chem trails?

  32. AS says:

    @Nexion 352

    “Should all the refugees go back to Syria?”

    Refugees who wish to go to Syria should be allowed to do so. Refugees who do not wish to go to Syria should not be forced to do so. It is that simple. No one chooses where they are born, so everyone should be allowed to choose where to live. People left alone will migrate at their own pace to wherever opportunities exist that they are looking for. All initiated violence, be it blocking them from leaving or entering any country, or forcing them to leave or enter any country, just gets in the way of the folkish sorting process.

    “If they do return what would be the next best route to the destruction of western civilization/”

    If they are deported by force despite preferring to stay, then we simply need to make it clear they are welcome to return and will not be subject to violence again (e.g. demolish walls and fences, execute Rehabs and Identitarian terrorists in public, build a bridge between Morocco and Spain), and they will eventually return.

    If on the other hand they leave voluntarily, then we need to consider what kind of state policies will attract the kind of people we want, while at the same time keeping away the kind of people we don’t want.

    Demographics aside, the culture war needs to continue also. We need to ferociously defend the ethical gains made by the late 20th century counterculture that are under attack from resurgent traditionalism. This is why I regularly bring up pop culture stuff from that period. Young people (born after 9/11) unacquainted with pre-9/11 pop culture literally have no high-quality cultural rooting to hold them steady against the pull of traditionalism today, no rolemodels to look up to that effortlessly reveal the inferiority of traditionalist rolemodels by comparison, even though excellent anti-traditionalist rolemodels exist aplenty in retro pop culture just waiting to be picked up and re-introduced to a new generation.

    Rightists like to boast that today’s youth is turning away from TV culture in favour of social media culture. In our perspective, this is plebianization of culture, which as a general rule will sooner or later lead back to traditionalism (as is already happening in present reality). Whereas if we rally young people according to retro pop culture, we will be gathering the fraction who dislike social media, and hence who tend to possess intuitive distate towards plebianism and by extension traditionalism, but at the same time avoiding the (deliberately) low quality of today’s TV culture (intended by Zionists to herd people towards social media and hence plebianism and hence traditionalism as per the backlash agenda).

    More subtly, promoting late 20th century pop culture is in fact also implicitly anti-Dugnist, as Turandom had minimal contribution to the cultural consciousness of that era, thus to psychologically re-establish that milieu is to put Turandom back its place on the subconscious level.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9We2XsVZfc

  33. Amaleq says:

    @Nexion 352:

    Do capitalists create artificial scarcity to raise prices? Sure. This does not take away from the fact that at some point resources will become truly scarce, as we do live on a finite planet, however, does it?

    “They have been claiming over population will kill us for some time. First it was 3 billion then 6 billion. Both of these populations were supposedly unsustainable at some point. I personally do not believe the pop is 7.5 billion, but 10 billion is not unsustainable in my opinion if you consider what china has done. Oh I see you mean the over population will cause a less western civilization. If it was the jewish plan to over populate then what is the point of chem trails?”

    I think you’re giving Jews way to much credit. I don’t believe it was a “Jewish plan” to overpopulate, they, like many other Judeo-Western elites simply do not care about the population problem, because the more people there are on the planet the more money can be made via capitalism and other various financial instruments such as derivatives for example; the Rothschild family pioneering those after-all…

    I think left to their own devices in a vacuum Jews would eventually destroy themselves. Their identity is unsustainable by itself.

    Why the chemtrails? Good question, they’re either to try and cool the planet, or they have another more nefarious purpose. I suspect they are in an attempt to try and cool the planet, personally. I don’t think it benefits a capitalist system to kill-off large swathes of people…

    “I personally do not believe the pop is 7.5 billion, but 10 billion is not unsustainable in my opinion if you consider what china has done.”

    80% of the rest of the world lives on less than $10.00 a day. That is how the West became wealthy under capitalism. That is the only reason the West is as wealthy as it is. Cheap labor and resources from the global south. Now add another 3 billion people to that. Lastly, it is not ‘space’ itself that is the root of the population problem, it is resource consumption, and the rate of consumption. How are we going to water the crops on the arable land when the aquifers run dry, for example? Then you’re going to have to import water, and all of a sudden that labor that was so cheap before starts to sky-rocket in price. Why do you think there are billionaires right now, like Boon Pickens, who are buying up the water supply?

    If You Think the Water Crisis Can’t Get Worse, Wait Until the Aquifers Are Drained: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/08/140819-groundwater-california-drought-aquifers-hidden-crisis/

    “Some 795 million people in the world do not have enough food to lead a healthy active life.” – World Health Statistics

    That is with population not being a ‘problem’, apparently. Now add 3 billion people to that, in a scenario where resources are being drained at an even faster rate….

    I think it’s also safe to say that as long as ideas like;

    “And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.” — Genesis 9:2 (Old Testament) are the corner-stones of someones civilization, (i.e. Western civilization) especially on a finite planet, things aren’t going to end well, even more-so when you add neoliberal capitalism to the mix.

    Western lifestyle promotes living beyond ones means on a finite planet, at the expense of 80% of the rest of the world. And that is the West’s dirty little secret, that being that its wealth would not have been possible without the plunder of other peoples nations.

    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21 – (Old Testament)

    And all of that, and we haven’t even began to mention the massive amounts of animals that have to be slaughtered everyday in order to sustain this madness. And now we’re going to add another 3 billion people to that equation…

    “Let me say it openly: we are surrounded by an enterprise of degradation, cruelty, and killing which rivals anything that the Third Reich was capable of, indeed dwarfs it, in that ours is an enterprise without end, self-regenerating, bringing rabbits, rats, poultry, livestock ceaselessly into the world for the purpose of killing them.” — John Maxwell Coetzee

    That’s what Judeo-Western civilization is all about. Terrible model for the rest of the world to follow!

  34. Amaleq says:

    @Nexion 352:

    “…but 10 billion is not unsustainable in my opinion if you consider what china has done.”

    Even China has had to go into Africa to try and “sustain” itself, albeit with better intentions than Westerners did.

    I don’t believe the models you are interpreting as “sustainable” are really all that “sustainable” at the end of the day….

  35. Amaleq says:

    Amendment:

    I think left to their own devices in a vacuum Jews would eventually destroy themselves trying to SURVIVE, which maybe coincidentally is what now appears to be the only goal of Western civilization at this point, and increasingly the rest of the world as ‘developing nations’ (viewed through Western eyes usually) attempt to mimic the Western way of life. Jewish identity couldn’t exist without the exploitation of others, neither could the idea of Judeo-Greco-Christian civilization. I don’t understand why more people don’t realize this?

    I think this is also why AS is right to call out the Alt-Right in particular, because they are the seedling in which the idea will grow that Western civilization should close itself completely off to the rest of the world, which it has savagely exploited mind you, whilst increasingly exploiting the rest of the world in order to SURVIVE itself, for no other reason than survival alone. Now add nuclear weapons and robots into that equation; backed up by a Western population that is increasingly lazy brained, dishonorable, demoralized, and probably getting ready to become cyborgs themselves (at-least those who can afford it) via Jewish transhumanism, to list a few horrors, and you can see why I see the lack of support for AS as horrible in itself…

  36. RP says:

    @Everyone
    I am sure many of you are aware of the “National Bolshevik” movement? Dugin himself was involved with the movement, and WNs like Heimbach (Gentile) and David Duke (Gentile) are also part of this movement.
    http://www.davidduke.com/images/duke-dugin.jpg

    Since WNs are ethno socialists, they are appreciative of the fact that former Eastern Bloc countries have been able to retain their tradition as well as their ethnic homogeneity.

    National Bolsheviks are also ve active only on image boards such as 8chan and 4chan. They call themselves “Nazbol” and use language that is extremely similar to the far right to bash leftists, calling them “bourgeois neoliberal cucks”. They also are extremely critical of ” idpol” (identity politics) and argue that class consciousness is the most important issue.

    Here is a meme that they have created:
    https://i.imgur.com/7Vn5nWG_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

    Notice how they mock the proletarian for “cucking” himself by defending the bourgeoisie, in the same way WNs accuse “white” leftists of “cucking” themselves by allowing “white” women to marry “black” men.

    With this we can see that the people far rightists call “communists” are not communists at all. While some leftists do indeed call themselves as such, the would no doubt, as Zizek says, be lined up against the wall and shot. While it is true that some leftists do call themselves as such and have philo Marxist leanings, this is not too dissimilar from BS Gentiles calling themselves “National Socialists”.

  37. Thunder Boier says:

    Truth is despite many, true facts and benevolent ideas which are told here, you still being misguided by the ones in power. You did not live when hitler was in power, so you do not know how things were back then. Documentaries like hellstorm are insofar correct as that its never been told how damaged german civilians were through the allies. Their cities were burned to ashes and yes you could call it a holocaust.
    But if you do some Research on who did this film you will find white supremacist (zionist agenda) behind it.
    HOWEVER you did not live back then and you do NOT know about the Repression and Opression done to innocent people by the NS-Regime.
    Doubt is not inferior to truth its above it, because if you actually do NOT know something for sure its good to doubt.
    I know People who are now no longer, who lived back then and i know what they told me, they were ordinary german people and some were from eastern europe and some from italy. One thing is def. not true, NS was not the good Guys as you paint them. (individuals allways exluded, i mean the Regime itself). It was a opressive State which which took away inborn human rights from simple, peacufull People who did not fully, or not fully subscribed to their Ideology, example People who did not see the fuehrer as a messiah…..(of course he was NOT! there is only one real God which is the one who created all life! and his Commandments of ye shall NOT kill and Love your Human Brother (ANY!) as you love yourself and DO to NOONE what you would NOT wanna be done to YOU, should be our Leader! We need no other Leader….!
    Here is a Poem by a Lady who lived back then:
    AND:
    U might not still believe me but, any thing that is created as religion or belief [islam, judaism, roman catholism, atheism etc.] or political idealogy such as Marxism, Zionism, Liberalism, Socialism, Kommunism, National Socialism, Leftism to dominate Earth as one kind of people [not from race but for example atheism/luciferianism], and kill others or slavery to rest is part of Lucifer’s secret idealogy army, to kill Christians, refugees are used as killing Christians because we are forced to bomb their families to death in Middle East by zionists, only ones who are always untouched are zionists, they want us Christians and muslims to kill each other while those Satan worship cults laught at human stupidity of ignorance , I am sorry if u r muslim because this might not be nice to hear, when Lucifer tried to take control of Heaven he was 11000 years ago sent to Hell for 1000 years and so was released 10000 years ago, then he met Adam and Eva, made them bite the bad fruit because Lucifer in disguise as a snake, snuk into Garden and God didn’t see it was Lucifer because of snake so they bit it and then were sent to Earth roaming freely, same as Lucifer and 300 other fallen angels, then Lucifer filled them with dark demonic energy and infected their soul and spirit of human body, then they [humans] and fallen angels had children of demonic bloodline, it makes us bad humans, Lucifer’s blood is what makes us make violence and other things upon other human beings and animals think what has happened in 10000 years of Lucifer roaming freely infecting our spirits and soul, then Lucifer created world’s first Satanic Cult : Brotherhood of [the] Snake [Satan] and then Illuminati was born too then Judaism, Catholism and Islam etc. were born, all Satan’s religions disguised as normal, only religion is Christianity : Not Protestant/Evangelic, Orthodox is Roman Catholism’s brother, trust me Lucifer is real, and he has made over 7 billion people Satanic, Illuminati Satanic Cult’s leading members are all most close to Lucifer’s Satanic Bloodline relatives, we are too but they are much more worse and demonic and psychopathic than us, mental illnesses are created by demons spiritually.?

    https://youtu.be/0fxbLwAzoYw

  38. Thunder Boier says:

    Weh über die Führer der Nationen

    Weh über die Führer der Nationen,
    Die Henker im Frack, die Mörder auf Thronen!
    Sie machen Geschichte, sie spinnen Netze,
    Mit Hilfe der Presse, der feilen Metze.

    Wenn faul Republiken und Monarchien,
    Nach Freiheit und Aufklärung wird geschrien,
    Dann heißt einen schneidigen Krieg erzeugen,
    Der Revolution noch schnell vorzubeugen.

    Dann treiben die Hirten die Herden zur Weide,
    Zum Kampffeld hinaus, rum tollt euch im Streite!
    Kühlt euer Mütchen, ein Volk am andern,
    Uns aber laßt den Herrenpfad wandern!

    Das tötet und würgt uns und wird getötet,
    Die ganze Welt ist von Blut schon gerötet,
    Sie kämpfen verzweifelt, Mann gegen Mann,
    Hat keiner was dem andern getan.

    Was hat euch, ihr Völker, mit Blindheit geschlagen,
    Wann wird es in euren Gehirnen tagen,
    Wann dringt in eure Seelen das Licht
    Der echten Freiheit, die liebt, nicht ficht?

  39. Thunder Boier says:

    Die Menschenbestie ist nun nie zu zähmen

    Die Menschenbestie ist nun nie zu zähmen,
    Ob sie im Frack, ob sie im Drillich steckt,
    Doch weiß sie schöne Mäntel umzunehmen,
    Wenn etwas ihre Lüsternheit erweckt.
    Daß Frommeln nicht, noch Aufklärung sie hemmen,
    Daß weder Hölle sie noch Himmel schreckt.
    Das ist noch lange nicht zur Mär geworden,
    Man weiß, die Menschenbestie liebt zu morden.

    Der Rasende im Kampf, der seinen Degen
    Bohrt in des Gegners Brust, wird hart bestraft.
    Mit Recht noch härter, wer auf Mörderwegen
    Des Nächsten Habe oder Weib errafft.
    Den Tod verdienet, wer der Menschheit »Segen«,
    Die »Allerhöchsten« ihr vom Halse schafft,
    - Tyrannen oder nicht -, trotz allem Schaden,
    Von Gottesgnaden ist von Gottesgnaden.

    Doch hinterm grünen Tische die Seigneure,
    So hoch gebildet, so durchaus verfeint,
    Vom Lackschuh bis zur Glatze eitel Ehre,
    Den Frack voll Orden, doch das Herz versteint,
    Leicht tänzelnd unter des Berufes Schwere,
    Der sonst ja nichts an Eigenglück verneint,
    Nach diesen Bestien laßt uns einmal spüren!
    Die schlimmsten nämlich sind, die kalkulieren.

    Spielt um den Globus ein beringter Finger,
    Dröhnt’s vor dem Stuhle aus besternter Brust.
    Die Presse säuselt, saust, wird zum Bezwinger
    »Ermanne Adel dich! Du Pöbel, mußt!«
    Der Hellste selbst wird da zum Fahnenschwinger,
    Zu Orgien schwillt der Patrioten Lust
    Dem blut’gen Kalbe opfern die Nationen,
    Und auf dem Schlachtfeld sterben Millionen.

    Ja, schön ist es fürs Vaterland zu sterben,
    Ob gut – kein Toter ward bis jetzt befragt.
    Gut aber ist es für des Krieges Erben,
    Wenn nicht für allzuviel Pension man klagt.
    Die große Masse mag noch lang verderben,
    Der letzte Heller wird ihr abgezwackt,
    Doch darf sie jubelnd an des Thrones Stufen,
    Am Sieggedenktag »Hoch« und »Vivat« rufen.

    Emerenz Meier

  40. Thunder Boier says:

    4 ALL who thirst for Righteousness:
    https://youtu.be/HBIspg9m87o, Here is the Best Speech since Jesus Christ! because HE speaks exactly what is wrong and shows the Solution for Humanitys Problems which is: WE MUST ALL BELIEVE in Equal Rights for all Humanity! /Earth! and NOT subscribe to ANY Facist/Zionist Ideology, or Belief who teach the Supremacy of some!! ——-> P.s: believe and live and ACT by Equal Rights for ALL Humanity/Earth, and YES Freedom is a Inborn Godgiven Right, no matter what ANYONE says, The only Law is Just harm noone!!

  41. Amaleq says:

    @Thunder Boier:

    “It was a opressive State which which took away inborn human rights from simple, peacufull People who did not fully, or not fully subscribed to their Ideology, example People who did not see the fuehrer as a messiah…..”

    Adolf Hitler preferred to simply be called “boss” by his closest comrades and confidants, not “messiah”, according to Hitler’s closest man servant Karl Wilhelm Krause. It may be true that Hitler saw himself as a “prophet”, but a prophet is nothing more than a messenger from the divine, not a “messiah” in the Judeo-Christian sense.

    Certainly the NSDAP did oppress enemies of the state and German folk. We need only look to Hitler’s campaign promise around 1923 to understand who the NSDAP believed to be the enemies of the German folk:

    “Who is Adolf Hitler? The man from the people, for the people! The German front soldier who risked his life in 48 battles for Germany! What does Adolf Hitler want? Freedom and food for every decent working German! The gallows for profiteers, black marketeers and exploiters, regardless of religious faith or race! Why is Adolf Hitler not allowed to speak? Because he is ruthless in uncovering the rulers of the German economy, the international bank Jews and their lackeys, the Democrats, Marxists, Jesuits, and Free Masons! Because he wants to free the workers from the domination of big money! Working Germans! Demand the lifting of the illegal ban on his speaking!

    By your use of the word messiah I know that you view the world through Jewish eyes, and most likely do not even realize it yourself, like most Westerners. You are a “spiritual Jew” (oxymoron), in that sense.

    “there is only one real God which is the one who created all life! and his Commandments of ye shall NOT kill and Love your Human Brother (ANY!)”

    So, you believe in the anthropocentric world view set forth by Judaism, no surprise there. You believe this makes you a “good” and “peaceful” person?

    You are clearly a follower of the Jewish god Yahweh, not Jesus the Nazarene, why else would you site the ten commandments here? Have you not realized that the Nazarean, the sect that Jesus would have been born into, were clearly anti-Moses:

    “The Nazarean – they were Jews by nationality – originally from Gileaditis, Bashanitis and the Transjordan… They acknowledged Moses and believed that he had received laws – not this law, however, but some other. And so, they were Jews who kept all the Jewish observances, but they would not offer sacrifice or eat meat. They considered it unlawful to eat meat or make sacrifices with it. They claim that these Books are fictions, and that none of these customs were instituted by the fathers. This was the difference between the Nazarean and the others…

    After this Nazarean sect in turn comes another closely connected with them, called the Ossaeans. These are Jews like the former… originally came from Nabataea, Ituraea, Moabitis, and Arielis, the lands beyond the basin of what sacred scripture called the Salt Sea… Though it is different from the other six of these seven sects, it causes schism only by forbidding the books of Moses like the Nazarean. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essenes

    “But if you do some Research on who did this film you will find white supremacist (zionist agenda) behind it.”

    Where do we promote the film Hellstorm, pr any other Third Reich revisionist films for that matter? What are you on about? This is NOT a revisionist website.

    “WE MUST ALL BELIEVE in Equal Rights for all Humanity!”

    You’re clearly in lala land:

    “My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world.” — Jesus

    “Why hunt ye these creatures of God, which are more noble than you? By the cruelties of many generations they were made the enemies of man who should have been his friends.” — Jesus

    Sounds like Jesus did NOT care much for “human rights and equality” to me? Jesus cared about all life, only Jews elevate “human” life above all other, hence the anthropocentric worldview of Jews, which you yourself have clearly fallen victim to. You are poisoned by Jewish thought, and don’t even know it.

    “Truth is despite many, true facts and benevolent ideas which are told here, you still being misguided by the ones in power.”

    So, I ask you, how sure about that are you? Are you 100% sure that it is not actually you that is deceived?

    “Lucifer roaming freely infecting our spirits and soul, then Lucifer created world’s first Satanic Cult…”

    You do realize that many early Christian sects and mystery schools referred to the Jewish god Yahweh, your god, as Satan himself, right? So, if Yahweh is Satan, then who is Lucifer? Lucifer cannot have kicked himself out of “heaven”, could he?

    “The idea of two Gods or principles, one being good and the other evil, was central to Cathar beliefs. The good God was the God of the New Testament and the creator of the spiritual realm, contrasted with the evil Old Testament God—the creator of the physical world whom many Cathars, and particularly their persecutors, identified as Satan. All visible matter, including the human body, was created by this evil god; matter was therefore tainted with sin. This was the antithetical to the monotheistic Catholic Church, whose fundamental principle was that there was only one God, who created all things visible and invisible. Cathars thought human spirits were the genderless spirits of angels trapped within the physical creation of the evil god, destined to be reincarnated until they achieved salvation through the consolamentum.

    From the beginning of his reign, Pope Innocent III attempted to end Catharism by sending missionaries and by persuading the local authorities to act against them. In 1208 Innocent’s papal legate Pierre de Castelnau was murdered while returning to Rome after excommunicating Count Raymond VI of Toulouse, who, in his view, was too lenient with the Cathars. Pope Innocent III then abandoned the option of sending Catholic missionaries and jurists, declared Pierre de Castelnau a martyr and launched the Albigensian Crusade which all but ended Catharism.”

    “The term demiurge derives from the Latinized form of the Greek term d?miourgos, ??????????, literally “public or skilled worker”. This figure is also called “Ialdabaoth”, Samael (Aramaic: sæm?a-?el, “blind god”), or “Saklas” (Syriac: sækla, “the foolish one”), who is sometimes ignorant of the superior god, and sometimes opposed to it; thus in the latter case he is correspondingly malevolent. Other names or identifications are Ahriman, El, Satan, and Yahweh.

  42. Amaleq says:

    @Thunder Boier:

    Furthermore, if we apply the logic that we find in the book of Deuteronomy:
    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21, to the ten commandments, we are left with this:

    1. You shall have no other gods before Me, YAHWEH
    2. You shall not make idols.
    3. You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.
    4. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
    5. Honor your father and your mother.
    6. You shall not murder, another Jew, thy brother
    7. You shall not commit adultery, against another Jew, thy brother
    8. You shall not steal, from another Jew, thy brother
    9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor, a Jew, thy brother
    10. You shall not covet, another Jew’s shit, thy brother

  43. Amaleq says:

    …or we could write it like this:

    1. You shall have no other gods before Me, YAHWEH, “the foolish one”
    2. You shall not make idols, unless they’re foolish
    3. You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, the “foolish one”
    4. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
    5. Honor your father and your mother, even if they’re abusive?
    6. You shall not murder, another Jew, thy brother; but a foreigner you may murder
    7. You shall not commit adultery, against another Jew, thy brother; but may commit adultery against a foreigner
    8. You shall not steal, from another Jew, thy brother; but from a foreigner you may steal
    9. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor, a Jew, thy brother; but you may bear false witness against a foreigner ADL, B’nai B’rith?
    10. You shall not covet, another Jew’s shit, thy brother; but a foreigner’s shit you may covet

    So Holy! LOL!

  44. Thundra Boier says:

    No Amount of you calling me a Jew or putting Words in my Mouth which i never said, will stop me from speaking the Truth!
    I will NOT defend myself bc i and all who know me, KNOW that i indeed speak and follow ONLY the Command of Jesus Christus the ONE who you hated and murdered, bc he indeed Condemned ANYONE who teaches Supremacy.
    By telling me i live in lala Land just bc i dared to state the ULTIMATE; UNIVERSAL Truth in your FACE, that ALL HUMANS were born wth. Equal Rights to be FREE and that satanic/facist/racist/zionist are those who preach supremacy YOU shown your true Face which has been suspected anyhow for a while.
    Palestine and ALL Earth will be free, no matter how much HASBARA the Enemy will bring on and who works for them.
    They might have the Time, Money and Man Power. But we have someone on our Side whom you can never ever conquer. Nuff said….!
    4 ALL who thirst for Righteousness:
    https://youtu.be/HBIspg9m87o, Here is the Best Speech since Jesus Christ! because HE speaks exactly what is wrong and shows the Solution for Humanitys Problems which is: WE MUST ALL BELIEVE in Equal Rights for all Humanity! /Earth! and NOT subscribe to ANY Facist/Zionist Ideology, or Belief who teach the Supremacy of some!! ——-> P.s: believe and live and ACT by Equal Rights for ALL Humanity/Earth, and YES Freedom is a Inborn Godgiven Right, no matter what ANYONE says, The only Law is Just harm noone!!

  45. Thundra Boier says:

    and research the Havara Agreement!!
    Its Equality for ALL versus Supremacy of some!! Its your Choice on which Side your stand.

  46. Meimou says:

    AS

    But does it? Does Critical Theory encourage conflict between Muslims and LGBTs, for example? Or between women and ethnic minorities? No, it does not. On the contrary, it encourages all these groups to stand together against the oppressor category.

    Students of CT see the “oppressor category” as white males(permanently) so I think calling them Marxist is resonable.

  47. John Johnson says:

    Speaking of National Bolsheviks:
    https://flagspot.net/flags/il%7D.html#inbp

    As it becomes more obvious that these National Bolsheviks share the same psychology as the original Bolsheviks, hopefully they’ll tidy up their “ideology” and continue moving away from NS. I guess their members realizing they are ‘Strasserists’ rather than actual National Socialists is a start:
    https://img00.deviantart.net/ad80/i/2016/327/a/0/national_bolshevik___strasserist_prop__poster_by_americansfr-dapcq6f.png

    ——–

    On the subject of Soviets as macho men in pop culture, here are some more examples that I’ve found.

    The character called Heavy in the video game Team Fortress 2 was born in the USSR and fans of the game frequently like to imagine him as a Soviet:

    http://teamfortress.wikia.com/wiki/Heavy
    http://th02.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/i/2010/356/d/a/tf2_heavy_weapons_officer_ii_by_birdofyore-d34o6rs.png
    http://orig02.deviantart.net/462f/f/2013/001/f/9/soviet_heavy_is_angry_by_privatedumpy-d5q4dyl.jpg

    From Uncharted 2, here is a Serbian character who committed warcrimes in Yugoslavia while employed as a Soviet intelligence officer:
    http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100309205328/uncharted/images/thumb/d/db/Zoran_Lazarevic_Uncharted_2_render.jpg/500px-Zoran_Lazarevic_Uncharted_2_render.jpg

    Basically, his only goal in the game is to acquire a magical artifact that will grant him infinite power. According to his wiki bio he’s a big fan of Nietzsche…
    http://uncharted.wikia.com/wiki/Zoran_Lazarevi%C4%87

    I’ve only seen the first Rambo movie, but it appears brawny Soviets were a recurring character type in the rest of the series:

    “Yushin is the first “big Russian” of the Rambo movies, next to Kourov in Rambo III. Both Yushin and Kourov have no dialogue and appear to be used more for their strength than their intelligence.”

    http://rambo.wikia.com/wiki/Sgt._Yushin
    http://rambo.wikia.com/wiki/Kourov

    And maybe this doesn’t count since nearly all comic book villains are macho killing machines:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGBeast

  48. Hypnotix says:

    @JJ

    “On the subject of Soviets as macho men in pop culture, here are some more examples that I’ve found. ”

    Here is another one to add:

    Viktor Marchenko, the antagonist of the last Deus Ex game, born in eastern Ukraine in 1991. He is a sleeper agent in the ARC, and is responsible for numerous false-flag terrorist attacks in the game.

    http://deusex.wikia.com/wiki/Viktor_Marchenko
    http://deusex.wikia.com/wiki/Viktor_Marchenko?file=Marchenko_confronts_Jensen_in_The_Throat.jpg

  49. Amaleq says:

    @Thundra Boier:

    This is what I think of the Havara Agreement:

    https://www.minds.com/media/787077849679925248

    “The only Law is Just harm noone!!”

    Did your god create ‘nature’, out of curiosity?

  50. Therra Boier says:

    Anyone with Brain will do their own Research about the Havara Agreement.
    Conclusivelly i stand by the Essence that we must choose either Equal Rights for All Human Beings or Supremacy of some. I choose Equal Rights for ALL Human Beings. And everyone is Free the only Law is to harm noone (includes Animals!)
    @Ameleq: Regarding your Question about why God created Nature i will say this:
    Animals kill out of Need (Hunger), Humans kill out of Greed! This has Earth has more then enough to feed all Need, however not Greed!
    This Law of harming noone, is bc Freedom stops when you take away another Mans Land (his Livelihood), or when you harm him Body or Soul.
    Which is why even People with Jewish Ancestry are NOT inherently evil from Birth(as some Supremacists would want to lie to us and want us to be lie ve so we are pinned 4ever against each other ), they are not evil, as long as they are not brainwashed and raised into Zionist Ideology/Oppressive and Triblist Jewry Re LIE gion….Many wake up and become Human and renounce their Upbringing. Kudos to them who do. Because its very hard to do so, imagine you raised in a kkk Family. In the End its their Leaders who are the most evil/to be held the most responsible. Grown ups somewhat yes! But def. NOT their Kids.
    I am not excusing anoyne but i see it from a human Perspective….can you?
    May the real Jesus Christ the one whom they murdered when he was here on Earth guide you to noble and rightous Deeds which work 4 Liberation of ALL Life on Earth.
    This is all i will say, all which is needed to be said, imho. Finally you are JUST my Human Brother not less, but def. not above me. Lets unite through noble Deeds, can you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>