The antidote has started to take effect, but…

As we promised would happen:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/612270/Germany-Jews-living-in-fear-of-anti-semitic-Muslim-refugees

http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/322645/dutch-jews-concerned-about-refugee-center-in-amsterdam-suburb/

Now the only thing that can go wrong is if the parasite can trick the host body into rejecting the antidote before the antidote is fully absorbed. Unfortunately, it looks like the parasite is succeeding. When a FIREFIGHTER is committing arson on a refugee centre and the government is letting him walk, you know we are in serious trouble:

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/europes-border-crisis/firefighter-accused-arson-syrian-refugees-home-germany-n444236

http://www.trust.org/item/20151013132624-j6v37/

And then, literally while I was writing this post, this happened:

http://www.lbc.co.uk/german-mayoral-candidate-stabbed-in-neck-118124

More about the victim here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henriette_Reker

We need to hold out for DECADES in order for the antidote to have time to work. Far-right terror attacks like these will continue through these decades. Unless we have an organized paramilitary fighting back against the far-right terrorists (because we’d be naive to expect the Zionist police to deal with them), they are likely to win. If you live in any EU member state and are willing to organize such a paramilitary, please contact us at once:

http://aryanism.net/about/contact/

(By the way, where is Ossendowski? He was supposed to be the one in charge of recruitment drives.)

While we welcome volunteers for this project from any and all countries in danger of far-right backlash against refugees, I would be dishonest if I did not admit that, as National Socialists, Germany is and will always be sentimentally special to us, therefore at this particular time I especially hope that we hear from German volunteers. We owe it to Hitler to defend Germany from the 21st century Identitarians just as the SA once defended it a century ago from the 20th century Bolsheviks who attacked innocent people with much the same tactics (and almost identical motives) as the Identitarians attack innocent people today. Identitarianism is indeed the Bolshevism of the 21st century; this becomes clearer with each passing day, and understanding this equivalence is crucial for making sense of what is currently going on:

http://aryanism.net/politics/multiethnic-society/is-race-the-new-class/

The other thing to understand is that the supposedly “pro-refugee” establishment Zionist governments (Merkel etc.) are NOT on our side on this issue. If they were on our side, they would not be keeping refugees packed in publicized but unguarded asylum centres where they are sitting ducks for arson and other attacks. If they were on our side, all the arsonists and other attackers would have been arrested by now. You really think the police can’t solve such simple crimes? No, I am willing to bet that the police are deliberately letting almost all the criminals get away with it, thereby sending out the message to other rightists that it is OK to burn down asylum centres, and hence encouraging more rightists to become arsonists! (And if the police are reading this, please prove me wrong by launching a serious crackdown on the criminals soon. I would love to be proven wrong. It would be a relief for me to be proven wrong.) If they were on our side, they would have been dispatching their navies to ferry in refugees safely, instead of leaving them to cross the Mediterranean in overloaded dinghies. If they were on our side, Turkey would have been allowed to join the EU ages ago. If they were on our side, they’d deal with PEGIDA the way China dealt with the Tiananmen Square protestors.

No, the establishment Zionist governments are doing what the Jewish parasite wants them to do: encourage rejection of the antidote. One way to encourage rejection of the antidote is to deliberately administer it clumsily and unhygeinically, so that the body enters convulsion. This is what is going on right now. We have far-right useful idiots too stupid to realize that the establishment Zionist governments are deliberately trying to put the far-right into power via reverse-bluff, and a False Left too stupid to realize the exact same thing (and hence continue to merely trust the government to protect the refugees). We need people who understand that when it comes to crunch time,  the establishment Zionist governments are NOT going to protect the refugees. Either we protect the refugees ourselves, or no one will.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

50 Responses to The antidote has started to take effect, but…

  1. Slave says:

    So, the antidote for far right extremism, and an identarian Europe is to do what is being orchestrated? Funnel in , in huge numbers, refugees, making it impossible to assimilate with the host and undermining the far right??

    Well, I can tell you Jews thrive on goyim conflict and this is part of the tearing apart process, before a rebuilding occurs in the full Jewish image, to erect the Jewish utopia (or that’s the vision)
    Me, as neither a Hitlerian leftist or rightest, for they have both been infiltrated with covert Jews or agents, has to question why you are not addressing this intentional flooding. Are you with Barbara Spectre here? Europe must learn to be multi-cultural to survive?

    I tell people, nothing, to better society, can be done until, like Hitler did, we remove Jewish power in the strategic places that subvert us and which has been orchestrating 80% of this shit. Simply read the protocols and know it’s three times worse now than in 1895. The major difference for us is that we must recognize this as an international struggle. One nation can not stand against Jewish power.

    You do know that the identarians have been perverted by Jews to accentuate the crassness they are so well known for, right? Since at least WWII this has been the case.

    Even if you see the evil identarians before you, you should know that the leak is the Jew, the water that results are the identarians. Same principal holds true for identarians with their racial hatred. The leak is the Jew, not the Muslim flooding, the Mexican illegaling, or Nigger, niggering. They are water, bailing water slows down the sinking of the ship, but doesn’t solve the problems till the leak is addressed. (Carpentry 101)

    I tell all of you that our struggle rises above race. Those that will be fighting the true enemy will do so because they are aware of who that enemy is or they have hooked onto a leader who knows that the enemy of all gentiles is the Jew. Let’s accept the Jew at his word on that, ok?

    Therefore, it’s not about race because if and when the SHTF, anyone buying Jewish lies will consider us, the Hitlerian world view, resistance, the enemy. Many whites will be our enemy! On this fact, there is potential to convince, over Jewish subversion efforts to prevent, that it’s an awareness issue, and not a race issue!~

    The race obsession is Jewish misdirection and likewise, your obsession on identarians is Jew mis-direction. I’m just adding 2+2 and getting four guys. It’s not that hard

    So that means I’m anti-Jew and on that being the priority, the uncoopted parts of the left and right Hitlerian political scene, by all rights, should be able to unite.

    There’s Hitlerian thinking and masonic thinking. Masonic thinking never acknowledges the root cause of the problem. Hitlerian thinking always strives to uncover the root cause, Jew behind the curtain.

    The Masonic arena price of admission is accepting the lying premises upon which it is based otherwise you are locked out. The Hitlerian arena has an obligation to try and infiltrate, legally, the masonic and take it’s power away. If that is impossible, as Hitler said, you have a right to more drastic measures at that point.

    For this reason, Those leaning to the Hitlerian are tempted to compromise to get a seat at the table to vie for power except as soon as you compromise the truth principle, you become masonic.

    From what I can see, you, here, are engaged in masonic thinking in this post and world view, as well.

    By all rights, like democrats and republicans come together in crisises, the identarians and SJWs that are Jew wise must realize they are on the same side, for now at least, till the Jew is disempowered.

    NUTHING CAN HAPPEN TO IMPROVE THINGS UNTIL THE JEWISH ELITES ARE DISEMPOWERED.

    Face it goy, Jews thrive on goyim conflicts. Why would you help make his job easier, oh you SJWs that are Jew wise.

    “When two goyim fight, a Jew always wins.”- the Jewish Catechism-1958-Tele-Aviv

  2. Frater Pan says:

    You often perceive a problem which could be of interest to a genuine, racial national socialists and anti-semites but than apply cultural marxist, theologian or liberal remedies. Why? If this was 3 Reich you’d ended up in Dakhau tied to a chair and slowly beaten to death.

  3. LuciferOverZion says:

    You need to read this website. The word “cultural marxist” is also inappropriate:

    “(* By Marxism, we refer strictly to theories that include advocacy against private property/business, against the worth of the individual, and against religion. By communism, we refer strictly to policies of dispossession of the bourgeois class in favour of the proletariat class, of mandatory atheism, and of “unmasking” and “re-educating” perceived dissenters via gulag torture. We do not partake in the present-day far-right neurosis of smearing anything and everything outside of the far-right (e.g. universalist religions, non-racism, non-sexism, non-homophobia) as “Marxist” or “communist”, which is utter nonsense. As a matter of fact, Cold War era communist countries tended to be far more socially conservative than capitalist countries, so that it was common for people living in communist countries to fantasize about capitalist countries as socially liberal paradises. It is innacurate to refer to freedom of migration as “communist”, as Cold War era communist countries did not even allow their own citizens to leave, let alone foreigners to settle in large numbers. It is also inaccurate to refer to the welfare state as “communist”, as communism assigns everyone capable of working to full-time work of the government’s choosing. It is certainly inaccurate to refer to LGBT mainstreaming as “communist”, as communists considered homosexuality to be a symptom of bourgeois decadance, and threw homosexuals into gulags. And it is totally inaccurate to refer to positive opinions towards Islam as “communist”, for obvious reasons!)”

  4. Frater Pan says:

    “Racist” is a made up word by a Marxist Jew Leon Trotsky in 1927. That’s why you use that word so extensively.

    “Cultural Marxism” is an accurate reference to Jewish Frankfurt school “Aryanism” traces most of their ideological contents from, not to the economism-ideology of ex-Communist countries. “Racial Marxism” would be even more appropriate term.

  5. @FP

    You seriously need to do some reading. As far as the word “racist” is concerned, look here: http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/Richard-Henry-Pratt.jpg

    Marxism is against race as a concept and only class. Aryanism focuses on race and racial health. Only you swallowed, hook line and sinker, the Jewish twisting on one race as being identical to one skin color. Just look at the way those Jews in that Amsterdam suburb are living. Most WNs I come across want to live just like that but “whites only.” Because they hate Jews, but love their methods. For another example, look at Boromir in LOTR.

  6. @ Frater Pan

    You are laughable. “Racist” is a made up word by a Marxist Jew Leon Trotsky in 1927? Well, according to uneducated morons from stormfront – probably yes. But in reality:

    “The Oxford English Dictionary’s first recorded utterance of the word racism was by a man named Richard Henry Pratt in 1902. Pratt was railing against the evils of racial segregation.” http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/01/05/260006815/the-ugly-fascinating-history-of-the-word-racism

    So if the facts don’t fit the theory change the facts, istn’t it?

  7. Frater Pan says:

    How could someone as well read as you could have missed the earlyer French anarchist usage?

    “In Charles Malato’s Philosophie de l’Anarchie (1897) we find both raciste and racisme…Although Malato was not in favor of racistes or racisme as such, regarding them as constituting an intermediate stage on the path from the destruction of the existing empires to his ideal of global anarchy… Note also that Malato specifically refers to Pan-Slavism as a form of racism, thus anticipating Trotsky’s application of the word.”

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/06/on-the-origin-of-the-word-racist/

    The first ideological mass application of the word “racist” was conducted by the Marxist left. “Aryanism” continues that Jewish tradition. The German word for racism (Rassismus) was not even once mentioned in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ or Rosenberg’s ‘Mythus des XX. Jahrhunderts’.

  8. Frater Pan says:

    Can you state one single black member of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party? It shouldn’t be a dificult task if they were anti-racist as you say they were. Not the armed forces, not the waffen SS but the National Socialist party.

    No? How about an Arab? Or a Chinese?

    And where can I find some authentic national socialist literature about “Aryans” from Nubia and other non-White locations stated on your page?

    Hitler was not a WN yet he also used the term “white race”, ascribed superior quality to that race and described the bastardization of that race with negroes as lowering of racial level.

    “It was and it is Jews who bring the NEGROES into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated WHITE RACE by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master. For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone. And so he tries systematically TO LOWER THE RACIAL LEVEL by a continuous poisoning of individuals.”
    (MEIN KAMPF, CHAPTER 11)

  9. Frater Pan says:

    Let’s make it even easier. Can you point at least to a mulatto member of the NS party, SA or Allgemeine SS?

    Why can’t you find some brown mulatto with or without metrically Aryan features enlisted into these ideological national socialist organizations?

    What kind of an anti-racist organization with over 2 million members was that if it had not even one single non-white or racially mixed member??

  10. AS says:

    @FP

    “Can you state one single black member of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party? It shouldn’t be a dificult task if they were anti-racist as you say they were.”

    There were no dog members of the NSDAP. By your logic, I guess we have to conclude that all the stuff about Hitler being an animal lover was also invented by Trotsky, and therefore we should set fire to one homeless animal pound per day, and stab Keith Mann in the neck.

    It was and it is Jews who bring the NEGROES into the Rhineland, always with the same secret thought and clear aim of ruining the hated WHITE RACE by the necessarily resulting bastardization, throwing it down from its cultural and political height, and himself rising to be its master. For a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew. In this world he will forever be master over bastards and bastards alone. And so he tries systematically TO LOWER THE RACIAL LEVEL by a continuous poisoning of individuals.”

    You are illiterate. This entire paragraph describes what JEWS believe (see bold), not what National Socialism believes. I agree with this paragraph. Jews do indeed believe in such a notion as a “white race” (Japheth). Jews do indeed believe in “white” superiority over “black” (according to Judaic standards), and do indeed believe that interethnic reproduction with “black” people is negative (according to Judaic standards). Hitler is just confirming what we already knew from reading the Tanakh.

    The whole intention of National Socialism is to offer a fundamentally different worldview to the Judaic (and hence Western) worldview, which is what we are doing.

    “We see how enormous the differences are between the ethics, the philosophy of life, the attitude toward others between the Jews and the settled peoples … They really are two completely different races. In the same way, the concept of ‘keeping the race pure’ can never be transferred from the Jewish example to, for example, the Aryan. And what was right and possible there may and can be completely incorrect as well as impossible here.” – Adolf Hitler

  11. @ Frater Pan

    Lol, what an ignorant. Let me guess, you haven’t read any of Veronica Clark’s books?

    In “Black Nazis II!: Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners in Hitler’s Armed Forces: The Unbiased History” there are many expamples of black or mulatto members of Hitlerjugend, Wehrmaht and even Waffen SS.

    For example: Werner Egiomue, who was an Afro-German, was in Hitlerjugend and served in Wehrmacht. He admited, that as a young man growing during National Socialist period he saw himself as “little Führer”. He joined Hitlerjugend at the age of 10 and recalled “I was one of those who was waving my swastika during the Führer’s birthday parade through Berlin in 1936.”

    So there you have it. Here’s your “one single black member of NSDAP” (I think you are aware that HJ was the youth organisation of the NSDAP). What is more: “There was never any law that forbade African German children from joining the Hitler Youth. In fact, there are several documented Black children who were involved in the organization.” – Veronica Clark, Blacks in Nazi Germany

    Many black volunteers served eg. in the Legion Freies Arabien, which in the middle of 1944 was transformed into a Waffen SS division and all its soldiers by definition members of SS. There were also black SS officers in the Croatian mountain division of the Waffen SS Handschar. Hans Hauck, mulatto, served in the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front. And many, many others… Just do some god damn research and stop ridicule yourself.

    “How about an Arab? Or a Chinese?”

    And how many Arabs or Chinese were in Germany in 1930s, you genius?

    Few quotes for you:

    “Under close scrutiny, the division into races according to the colour of skin turns out to be quite the crudest and most obvious method, since there are noticeably inheritable characteristic racial differences among people of identically coloured skins.” – Alfred Rosenberg (National Socialist Ideological Development)

    “We have this folk of ours that is not to be defined as a race, and this is now clear to millions. However, when I began my career twenty-five years ago, this was not the case; then I was always told by bourgeois circles: “Yes, folk and race are one and the same.” No, folk and race are not the same! Race is a component of blood – a blood kernel, but a folk is very often composed not of one but of two, three, four or five different blood kernels.” – Adolf Hitler (final speech, May 26, 1944)

    “Some will argue that Hitler’s National Socialism can only apply to his time period and must be specific to Germany. This is in profound contradiction to the very symbol which the Leader chose; a symbol which is found all over the world; the swastika. In this present age, which is to say the 21st century and specifically the two-thousandth and ninth year of our common era, National Socialism is experiencing a resurgence across the globe. There are National Socialist organizations from Ireland to Russia and all the way to China and Japan. Admittedly some are stuck in a pre-Platterhof mode of thinking. Which means they are racially supremacist. Of course, even previous to Platterhof, Hitler was a Volkish cultural supremacist, not a racial supremacist, but that is an argument for another speech. Previous to the Leader’s speech at Platterhof, Hitler towed the party-line, as it were. On May 26, 1944, he asserted what he had clearly felt for many years of his life, and that is that all people, the supposedly pure German included, are an amalgamation of many racial kernels in the way of their racial heritage.” – John Alan Martinson, What is National Socialism

    So it looks like our Peter Pan just stuck in a pre-Platterhof mode of thinking.

  12. Frater Pan says:

    “There were no dog members of the NSDAP. By your logic, I guess we have to conclude that all the stuff about Hitler being an animal lover was also invented by Trotsky, and therefore we should set fire to one homeless animal pound every day”

    There were no dog members in NSDAP because they didn’t treated animals as equals. That doesn’t mean they hated animals. That same principle could be extended to blacks and Arabs too. It’s not un-National Socialist to OWN or use one but it is un-National Socialist to exate them with Whites.

    “and stab Keith Mann in the neck.”

    Hitler OWNED a dogs which is something completely incompatible with your or Animal Liberation Front/Keith Mann’s ideology. He OWNED dogs like American Whites OWNED blacks. He used animal products for food which means cows were his SLAVES.

    We could compare Mann and similar leftist radicals of our time with numerous leftist terrorists of Hitler’s time that ended up Dakhau. So it’s not un-National Socialist to want to stab Mann in the neck. That would be a display of nobility, a display of heroism over subhuman degeneracy and alien ideology.

    I don’t know was it Leni Riefenstahl or someone else eye-witness but Hitler at one point wanted to take out his pistol and kill Blondie for misbehaving, showing signs of agression toward some of his guests at Berghof. That doesn’t mean he hated Blondie. I don’t hate Arabs and negroes neither, I just want to kill them for the same reason Hitler reportedly wanted to kill Blondie.

    “This entire paragraph describes what JEWS believe (see bold), not what National Socialism believes.”

    And what happens if you bolden “he tries”? Notice that it’s HE (Jew) who “tries” (to lower the racial level), not “National Socialist who tries” (to lower the racial level). So why would you want to try something like that? Are you a Jew?

    “The whole intention of National Socialism is to offer a fundamentally different worldview to the Judaic (and hence Western) worldview, which is what we are doing.”

    A number of ideologies besides National Socialism tried to offer fundamentally different worldview to Judaic and Western and a disproportionately large number of them (Aryanism included) are Jewish, either by authorship or by the content or by the line of reasoning. I have yet to see the evidence that National Socialism was an anti-racist ideology and an anti-racist movement. We’re not talking about ancient history here so the evidences for your extraordinary claim should be overwhelming and undeniable. Where is the proof that anti-racism was mandatory in Third Reich? There always were racists in every period of human history and in every country, so where is your proof that Hitler persecuted racists in Germany? Or forced racial integration into German schools, or racial quotas in working places, or in social clubs? Where is the proof he did even a tinny portion of all anti-racist measures we are faced with today under the leftists? Why can’t we watch anti-racist contents in Third Reich cinema? If anti-racism was really a part of the authentic NS worldview wouldn’t Gobbels ordered filming some anti-racist movies to indoctrinate German population with anti-racist morals? Where can I watch the German version of “Guess Whose Coming to Dinner” or “Avatar” or “StarWarsVII”? Where can I see some Third Reich posters or commercials promoting interracial marriage? How many Germans were wed before the church or the state to non-Whites during Third Reich? Any further conversation is pointless if you can’t answer these questions.

  13. Frater Pan says:

    “haven’t read any of Veronica Clark’s books?”

    Veronica Clark was not an NSDAP member but an ADL member. Her worldview and agenda was not authorized by Hitler or any other National Socialist authority. Her word on it is just as good as yours, meaning no good at all. I only take into consideration direct National Socialist sources and materials.

    “Adolf Hitler (final speech, May 26, 1944)..”

    I can only find Veronica Clark’s kosher sources online for that alleged “Hitler’s speech”…and you expect me to take you seriously.

    “For example: Werner Egiomue, who was an Afro-German, was in Hitlerjugend”

    Everyone had to be in Hitlerjugend because such was the law. Similarily everyone had to by in Communist Pioneer organizations in Eastern Europe but not every Eastern European was a Communist or a Communist party member.

    “and served in Wehrmacht.”

    So did many Jews. But that was not my question. I am perfectly aware that a number of non-whites served in the armed forces. How does it prove that Hitler was an anti-racist? Or that the ideology of NSDAP was an anti-racist ideology? Or that anti-racism was even condoned?

    “And how many Arabs or Chinese were in Germany in 1930s, you genius?”

    That’s because Germany in 1930s was not inviting them into Germany like Jews and anti-racists do today. If Hitler was an anti-racist why didn’t he flooded Germany with thirdworlders? He had his chance. He had a more power over Germany under his dictatorship than contemporary anti-racists and Jews have under democracy, so why didn’t he used that power import Middle Easterners to piss and shit at his Nurnberg rallies or beat up some “privileged” German children and rape their mothers and sisters? By looking at thirs reich photos and even the official posters I notice that some National Socialist German women and mothers do not wear a headscarf. Why didn’t he imported some muslim monkeys to call them whores? Not even Eva Braun wore a headscarf. Was she a whore too? Your demands resonate contemporary left-liberal (Jewish) and islamic morals and practices, not National Socialist morals and practices.

    “Under close scrutiny, the division into races according to the color of skin…”

    Where have equated race with the color of skin? It is you who have failed to provide a non-European National Socialist with perfect Aryan features. Or a Reich-sanctioned marriage of a German man or woman with such.

    “…John Alan Martinson…”

    Just like Veronica Clark, a totally unrelated American with his own anti-racist agenda. Anti-semitism or the admiration for Hitler does not make one an authority on National Socialism or a National Socialist.

  14. Frater Pan says:

    Just to make one point clear. An absence of explicit hatred for nonwhites does not make one an anti-racist or even a non-racist. You can say that Hitler was not like an average KKK or Stormfronter but how can you claim that Hitler was an anti-racist without providing at least some evidence for his anti-racism in his own words and deeds? If he was an anti-racist why didn’t he made anti-racism mandatory for all Germans or at least for his own party members? Why didn’t he incorporated his anti-racism into the ideology and movement he created? I’m certain Veronica Clark, John Alan Martinson or some Arabs would do precisely that if they were in his place, but the fact remains that the actual Hitler did not and no amount of Hitler worship and anti-Semitism on their part can change that simple fact.

  15. Frater Pan says:

    What do anti-racist do? They accuse, persecute, mistreat and (when they can) kill people they call racists. Can you present a single case of a German in Third Reich who was accused persecuted, mistreated or killed because of racism?

  16. @ Frater Pan

    “Veronica Clark was not an NSDAP member but an ADL member. Her worldview and agenda was not authorized by Hitler or any other National Socialist authority. Her word on it is just as good as yours, meaning no good at all.”

    But you are aware that ad hominem attack is not an argument but merely shitty eristic without any substantive vaule? Adress V.K. Clark’s sources, disprove her arguments or gtfo.

    “I only take into consideration direct National Socialist sources and materials. ”

    (Afler a moment)

    “I can only find Veronica Clark’s kosher sources online for that alleged “Hitler’s speech”…and you expect me to take you seriously.”

    xD

    Serioulsy man, you are laughable. Before the moment you demanded “direct National Socialist sources and materials” and when someone quote to you excerpt from original Hitler’s speech, you call that speech “alleged”. If the facts don’t fit the theory change the facts, huh? Prove that this speech is fake or gtfo.

    “Everyone had to be in Hitlerjugend because such was the law. Similarily everyone had to by in Communist Pioneer organizations in Eastern Europe but not every Eastern European was a Communist or a Communist party member.”

    So now “moving the goalpost argument”? Earlier you demanded “one single black member of NSDAP” (even thought I could easily named at least few more) so I fulfilled your request. Instead of admitting that your argument was a failure you are now “moving the goalpost” and wading further into your nonsenses. No, not everyone had to be in Hitlerjugend. Jews weren’t in Hitlerjugend. And so do Gypsies. And among others Hans Massaquoi, an Afro-German,
    which was not allowed to join Hitlerjugend. Why? His mother sympathized with Liberals and Jews, so his experience is in stark contrast to African Germans (like Werner Egiomue) who saw themselves as part of the folk.

    “So did many Jews.”

    No, Jews didn’t serve in Wehrmacht. Jews were in ghettos or in concentration camps. There were people with jewish descent in Wehrmacht but they considered themselves as a part of folk community and thus they denounced their “jewishness”. They fought for swastika and National Socialism. Equating these people with Jews is imho an insult to them.

    “That’s because Germany in 1930s was not inviting them into Germany like Jews and anti-racists do today. (…)”

    Off-topic bullshit.

    “Just like Veronica Clark, a totally unrelated American with his own anti-racist agenda. Anti-semitism or the admiration for Hitler does not make one an authority on National Socialism or a National Socialist.”

    Just like before: shitty ad hominem eristic without any substantive vaule. Adress Matrinson’s arguments or gtfo.

  17. Ostmann says:

    Germany is going down.

  18. Ostmann says:

    ” I am insisting that the biblical name ‘Amalek’ is to be used exclusively for the ‘German Peoples’ and not for the Arabic Peoples. A king in israel has the duty (…) to erradicate the Amalekites without leaving any traces of them behind. (…) No pity is to be shown on any creatures from the peoples of the Amalekites- Man, woman, child or even cows.” – Rabbi Shmuel Derlich- from Jerusalem Post, may 6th 1986

  19. Alex Alexander says:

    Is there any positive news?

  20. Frater Pan says:

    >>>Some will argue that Hitler’s National Socialism can only apply to his time period and must be specific to Germany. This is in profound contradiction to the very symbol which the Leader chose; a symbol which is found all over the world; the swastika.

    Nobody used the National Socialist flag before Hitler. It is a distinctive symbol of the National Socialist GERMAN Worker’s party and ought to be observed as a holistic national and ideological symbol of which the swastika is just one element. Like the five-pointed star, another symbol used all over the world swastika is devoid of a specific meaning it represents in GERMAN NATIONAL TRICOLOR, the Third Reich and NSDAP regalia. What does the five-pointed star represents if deprived of context? Soviets, Iraquis, Americans, freemasons, marxists, baathists, satanists or none of the mentioned? Your guess is just as good as mine and nobody holds the exclusive rights on interpretation except the one who issued it. I will accept only the first hand statements of Hitler, the Reich and the Party as factual and all external, ex post facto interpretations as larping at best or alien ideological cargo at worst.

    >>>National Socialism is experiencing a resurgence across the globe. There are National Socialist organizations from Ireland to Russia and all the way to China and Japan.”

    That’s not what Hitler said it should be. “WE shall overcome this calamity, too, and this fight, too, will not be won by central Asia but BY EUROPE; and at its head will be THE NATION THAT HAS REPRESENTED EUROPE against the East for 1,500 years and SHALL REPRESENT IT FOR ALL TIMES: our Greater GERMAN Reich, the GERMAN nation.” (Hitler, Last Speech, Jan 30. 1945)

    If you trust JAM (or anyone else) more than Hitler than don’t call your selves National Socialists because these two individuals speak about two different, irreconcilable visions. Think closely about every Hitler’s word without attributing any external or your own desired meaning to it; “We” – what did he meant by “we” in this particular context? Did he meant some abstraction like “all humans” or did he meant Germans and Europeans? AN ORGANIC (RACIAL) IDENTITY. “Europe” – why did he said that particular word? Why did’nt he said “the World” like some Roman pope would? Or like some globalist politician would? Or like JAM and aryanism.net would? Why is he focused on Europe so much and not Africa, China or Japan? “THE NATION THAT HAS REPRESENTED EUROPE” – So Germany according to Hitler represented Europe, and not something else … like all continents of the globe or a collection of multi-racial individuals of some particular persuasion.

    If Hitler was an anti-racist or an afro-centric ‘nazi’ like JAM than why didn’t he killed Rosenberg who wrote:

    “Negroes and mulattos stroll about on arms of white women. An exclusively Jewish quarter has arisen with new synagogues. Arrogant and repulsive bastardlike creatures pollute the race of the still beautiful women who are drawn to Paris from the French provinces. It is a modern repetition of the tragedy which long overtook Persepolis, Athens, and Rome. This is why a close alliance with France, quite apart from the military and political aspects, would be racially so dangerous. On the contrary, what is needed is a clarion call for defence against African infiltration, for the closing of frontiers on the basis of anthropological considerations, and the establishment of a Nordic European coalition for the object of cleansing Mother Europe of the filth of Africa and the Levant. This would be in the true interests of the French themselves.”

  21. Pandorastop says:

    Did Hashtali not make himself clear? I believe that he did.

    http://aryanism.net/blog/hashtali/the-ko-rule/

  22. Alex Alexander says:

    @Pandorastop

    I know right, AS’ post is already a hard kick, do we really need this insane troll Frater Pan posting here, his posts are enough he doesn’t need to generate more.

  23. Hashtali says:

    @Pandorastop
    “Did Hashtali not make himself clear? I believe that he did.”

    I am not opposed to debate as a whole, just to useless debate. Most of the debates with Frater Pan so far have been useless, as he’s mainly challenged our attitudes. After a while it became clear we would get nowhere because he belongs to a different race, so that our worldviews are irrevocably opposed to each other. This time, though, he’s not challenging our attitudes so much as our historical claims, and some of his arguments are worth addressing.

    @Frater Pan
    “There were no dog members in NSDAP because they didn’t treated animals as equals. That doesn’t mean they hated animals.”

    Hitler would’ve, correctly, regarded most NSDAP members as not being equal with himself (why else would he be leader after all?), but he didn’t exclude them. So this has nothing to do with equality. Rather it has to do with the fact that there weren’t any dogs volunteering to join the NSDAP, and there was no practical need to recruit them. Given the ethnic demographics of Germany at the time, there was no practical need to attempt recruiting people of a variety of skin colros. As for any volunteering, beside the cases Aryan Militarism mentioned, I have no idea, and personally have better things to do than to look through every NSDAP member’s and every NSDAP applicant’s profile to find out.

    “That same principle could be extended to blacks and Arabs too. It’s not un-National Socialist to OWN or use one but it is un-National Socialist to exate them with Whites.”

    Frater Pan, enough of your bullshit! You ask us to provide historical, primary proof for our statements, and yet you have the nerve to pull such filth out of your ass and present it as National Socialist truth! No National Socialists owned any “blacks” or Arabs, and it was never something supported by National Socialist ideology.
    (By the way, “exate” is not a word, so I don’t know what you’re talking about there. Please correct me if I’m wrong.)

    “I don’t know was it Leni Riefenstahl or someone else eye-witness but Hitler at one point wanted to take out his pistol and kill Blondie for misbehaving, showing signs of agression toward some of his guests at Berghof. That doesn’t mean he hated Blondie. I don’t hate Arabs and negroes neither, I just want to kill them for the same reason Hitler reportedly wanted to kill Blondie.”

    And yet apparently our sources are sketchy….

    “And what happens if you bolden “he tries”? Notice that it’s HE (Jew) who “tries” (to lower the racial level), not “National Socialist who tries” (to lower the racial level). So why would you want to try something like that? Are you a Jew? “

    The communist Jews also tried to take power from the bourgeoisie and, apparently, give it to the proles. Was the National Socialist response to try to restore power to the bourgeoisie?

    “A number of ideologies besides National Socialism tried to offer fundamentally different worldview to Judaic and Western and a disproportionately large number of them (Aryanism included) are Jewish, either by authorship or by the content or by the line of reasoning.”

    Then they didn’t really try, because they would still be Judaic. As for your insult to us, it’s not worth taking seriously.
    “Where is the proof that anti-racism was mandatory in Third Reich? There always were racists in every period of human history and in every country, so where is your proof that Hitler persecuted racists in Germany? Or forced racial integration into German schools, or racial quotas in working places, or in social clubs? Where is the proof he did even a tinny portion of all anti-racist measures we are faced with today under the leftists?”
    At the time, Hitler had better things to do than give primary focus on domestic issues related to skin color given Germany’s demographics. Likewise, I wouldn’t expect a present-day NS leader of a largely monoethnic nation to give primary attention to issues of skin color or integration of a small number of immigrants. (On the other hand, should problems related to this come up, I would expect the leader to address them; for example, see the last two sentences under “Wasn’t Hitler racist?”: http://aryanism.net/about/faq/) I would expect a present-day NS leader to focus on such issues if his society can be considered multiethnic and if there are ethnicity-related issues.
    On the other hand, it is incorrect to equate the measures of the present-day False Left with that of (True Left) Hitler’s Germany or with a National Socialist regime in general. For example, a National Socialist values quality in the workplace, and so wouldn’t attempt to hire people unfit for a job just to fit a “racial” (really ethnic) quota (and there would be no such quotas in a National Socialist regime in the first place). At the same time, a National Socialist would admit social injustice, including injustice centered around ethnicity, and would try to end it, just as Hitler worked to end social injustice against the various “classes”. In contrast, communists would’ve simply called for the prole group’s interests over bourgeois group ones, just like you would call for the “white” group’s interests over “non-white” group interests.
    More significantly, a National Socialist regime stands apart form the False Left ones in so far as they offer an ideal for seemingly different people to rally around, thus defeating inter-group hostility though common goals, cooperation, and sacrifice. And, just as significantly, a National Socialist regime, unlike False Left ones, are not afraid to deal with the worst racists this world has ever known, the Jews.

    “Why can’t we watch anti-racist contents in Third Reich cinema? If anti-racism was really a part of the authentic NS worldview wouldn’t Gobbels ordered filming some anti-racist movies to indoctrinate German population with anti-racist morals? Where can I watch the German version of “Guess Whose Coming to Dinner” or “Avatar” or “StarWarsVII”?”

    I guess Miecz’s article is a timely one, then: https://swordofelysium.wordpress.com/2015/10/11/olympia-part-i-the-festival-of-folks/
    By the way, to be precise, it’s not indoctrination, but aesthetic Aryan reunification.

    “Where can I see some Third Reich posters or commercials promoting interracial marriage?”

    Hitler had better things to do than try to hook up people with very small German groups.

    “How many Germans were wed before the church or the state to non-Whites during Third Reich?”

    I have better things to do than try to count them all, but here’s one example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subhas_Chandra_Bose

    “Any further conversation is pointless if you can’t answer these questions.”

    I’ve been telling you for a long time that conversation between us is pointless, but that’s primarily your fault. Hopefully you get it soon and just leave. (I have a feeling, though, that you’re not serious about this and are just trying to be a smartass, so unfortunately this probably won’t be the last of you.)

    “Just to make one point clear. An absence of explicit hatred for nonwhites does not make one an anti-racist or even a non-racist. You can say that Hitler was not like an average KKK or Stormfronter but how can you claim that Hitler was an anti-racist without providing at least some evidence for his anti-racism in his own words and deeds? If he was an anti-racist why didn’t he made anti-racism mandatory for all Germans or at least for his own party members? Why didn’t he incorporated his anti-racism into the ideology and movement he created? I’m certain Veronica Clark, John Alan Martinson or some Arabs would do precisely that if they were in his place, but the fact remains that the actual Hitler did not and no amount of Hitler worship and anti-Semitism on their part can change that simple fact.”

    There was no practical need to focus Germany’s attention to integrating a very small group (which would’ve happened spontaneously anyway given National Socialist culture). Hitler’s anti-racism is made evident in his disdain for Jews, as well as the support he provided to national freedom movements in colonized nations at the expense of racist, “white” colonial interests.

    “What do anti-racist do? They accuse, persecute, mistreat and (when they can) kill people they call racists. Can you present a single case of a German in Third Reich who was accused persecuted, mistreated or killed because of racism?”

    Oh, I’m sorry, it seems you’re not acquainted with the fate of Jews in the Third Reich. Would you like me to introduce you to the mainstream Zionist version of the story or to the revisionist version? In any case, I assure you, that group of racists was no longer considered German and didn’t end up in a very good place.

    “Nobody used the National Socialist flag before Hitler. It is a distinctive symbol of the National Socialist GERMAN Worker’s party and ought to be observed as a holistic national and ideological symbol of which the swastika is just one element…. Your guess is just as good as mine and nobody holds the exclusive rights on interpretation except the one who issued it. I will accept only the first hand statements of Hitler, the Reich and the Party as factual and all external, ex post facto interpretations as larping at best or alien ideological cargo at worst.”

    Here is what Hitler had to say: “in the swastika, [we National Socialists see] the mission of the struggle for the victory of the Aryan man, and, by the same token, the victory of the idea of creative work.” Hitler’s use of the swastika has much greater implications than simply national ones, therefore.

    “That’s not what Hitler said it should be. “WE shall overcome this calamity, too, and this fight, too, will not be won by central Asia but BY EUROPE; and at its head will be THE NATION THAT HAS REPRESENTED EUROPE against the East for 1,500 years and SHALL REPRESENT IT FOR ALL TIMES: our Greater GERMAN Reich, the GERMAN nation.” (Hitler, Last Speech, Jan 30. 1945)”

    Read it more carefully. Why did he say central Asia instead of Asia? You would create a narrative of “white” Europeans versus “non-white” Asians, but that’s not what Hitler was going for. Rather, his narrative was similar to our own Asgard (Aryan) versus Vanaheim (Turanian, hence “central Asia”). In fact, he saw the Turanian element embodied in the Bolshevik Russians (who, by the way, are “white”), and that was what he was fighting against. Likewise, he supported the “non-white” Japanese in their fight against the same element from Russia, hoping that Japan would likewise stand behind an Aryan ideal against Turandom. (By the way, he also supported the Japanese in the Russo-Japanese War, for similar reasons, and this was back as a teenager when he had no practical need to do so.)

    “If Hitler was an anti-racist or an afro-centric ‘nazi’ like JAM than why didn’t he killed Rosenberg who wrote:”“Negroes and mulattos stroll about on arms of white women. An exclusively Jewish quarter has arisen with new synagogues. Arrogant and repulsive bastardlike creatures pollute the race of the still beautiful women who are drawn to Paris from the French provinces. It is a modern repetition of the tragedy which long overtook Persepolis, Athens, and Rome. This is why a close alliance with France, quite apart from the military and political aspects, would be racially so dangerous. On the contrary, what is needed is a clarion call for defence against African infiltration, for the closing of frontiers on the basis of anthropological considerations, and the establishment of a Nordic European coalition for the object of cleansing Mother Europe of the filth of Africa and the Levant. This would be in the true interests of the French themselves.”

    I disagree with Rosenberg, but let’s contextualize his view. Early twentieth-century Western historians were not very knowledgeable about Aryan diffusion in Africa, and usually proposed that anything like it would’ve come from some sort of “white” Mediterranean group. In fact, there were non-racist historians who, writing decades after Rosenberg wrote his book, would claim “blacks” had not yet produced any civilization. If this were true, it would mean France were bringing in a significant amount of heavily non-Aryan individuals, and Rosenberg’s concern would be understandable. The main problem is that this is not true, as discussed here: http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/aryan-diffusion-part-5/ (Also check out the Human Beauty page: http://aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/human-beauty/) Hitler did not endorse Rosenberg’s The Myth of the Twentieth Century. I believe he realized Rosenberg had the right attitude, but the incorrect (or limited) knowledge. He would’ve seen the need for more research into the topic before reaching such general conclusions. Hitler personally did not discriminate against “blacks”, and in fact asked one of his SS-Untersturmfuehrers to marry a Mauritanian princess, and I doubt you’d consider Mauritanians “white”.
    At the moment we have much more knowledge about Aryan diffusion in Africa, and there is ongoing research. We also know there are “black” Aryans, both going by theory, as well as through personal interactions. We have the choice to correct Rosernberg’s mistaken conclusion, and we intend to.

    To everybody else, I know I’m a bit late (for some that’s a huge understatement) in getting back to you. Sorry. I’m working on it.

  24. Ostmann says:

    Merkel has put in motion an old plan. Not long before the latest developements in S.E. Europe and Germany, Barbara Coudenhove-Kalergis said that this ‘transfere’ off populations cannot and will not be turned around. Her Oncle, R.N. Coudenhove- Kalergis, a EU- Idiologist, the founder of the Pan-European Union, Freemason, supported by influencial JWO financeres like rothschild and warburg, wrote already in 1925 in ‘Practical Idealismus’ that: ” The person of the future will be a ‘mongrel, halfbreed’ (Mischling). Today’s races and casts will fall victim to prejustice*. The Eurasic- Negroide race of the future will on the outside be similar in taint to that of the old Egyptians. The diversity of the different Volks / Nations will be replaced with the diversity of the personality. Those people will be perfidiously, unpiously, unstable, selfindulging, with a lack of character and a weak will.” Basically too ignorant to comprehend but still able to work. * Note that in freemason parlance prejustice only applies to ‘against jews’, so another hint who the enslavers are.
    Don’t forget types like Emanuel Levinas, some kind of jewish hero- philosoph, who constantly demanded the de-powering of the ‘Nations’ via population transfere and mixing but vehemently forbade any such for his own jewish race.
    Thomas Barnett, some Pentagon type wrote 2005 in ‘Blue print for action’: “To all those enemies who fear the loss of their identity within the urbaniziced and divided gray masses, in which everyone only stands for her / his personal interrests.. Yes I hear your arguments, but will they struggle against the NWO I demand: Kill them!”
    The will and, strength to defeat this monster-enslavement can only come from within the core of a strong Volk, forged together over the ages. To defeat this will and strenght, not only in Germany, which has no sovereignty whatsoever, but every where we getting wars and ‘population replacement’.
    Folks, there is no need to reinvent the wheel- we have the blueprint for the solution: The policies off NS Germany, financial, economic and the important cooperation with other peoples, based on mutual respect, as far-a-way as Japan.
    .

  25. Ostmann says:

    @ Frater Pan,
    Personally I am not a fan of some of A. Rosenberg’s writings. Gottfried Feder beeing one of my favorites since he clearly- Just like A.H. recocnized the world-enemy and the solutions to deconstruct his enslavement tactics. One need to remember that National Socialism only had a few precious years of creating a higher Ideal and to bring the divided and fractured Volk together. There were still different views prevailant- From allmost communists (like some of the Rohm faction) to out right racists and the bourgeois. G. Feder wrote of closing the borders to immigration, but in the context to eastern jewry. To fully implement N.S. would have taken the next generation. As far as photografic evidence, at nseuropa one can watch the German newsreels and films showing a.o. German and Japaneese submarine crews at play / sports during recipocal visits, the training of Indian, Arab, Turkistan and other ethnic groops in the German military. The anti-usury, anti-comintern ‘Axis’ alliance had different members- But still not enough. The point is this: It is imposible for a single nation / ethnicity to take on capitalbolshevism and succeed (even if all supposetly white nations, from the Americas over Europe and Russia would form such an alliance (unlikely at the present), the enemy would move China or another combination of nuke-powers against them. The same goes for any other possible ‘Rebel’ alliance. Why was kissinger & Co over there enableing them in the seventies. Sporadic resistance by one then, sometime later, another one is useless, they will simply be burned to the ground. This phenomenon next to financial control is the bases for the enemy’s success. The dictum ‘As outside so also on the inside’ applies. Endless division and splintering of a Volk on a national level and the division of the nations on the geo-political level (Multi-culti and multi-polar) makes COOPERATION key, that is resisting in syncronicity, this is what the world-enemy off all peoples is afraid off the most. It is stated so in their ‘scriptures’- Not to take on or provoke an alliance of all the nations (Tower off Babel). I would struggle shoulder-to-shoulder with anyone, just like Germany did, if that person understands who the only world-enemy is and understands his methods. Does it mean I am forced to merry this persons relative? -No.

  26. Abu Haydar says:

    @Frater Pan
    “What do anti-racist do? They accuse, persecute, mistreat and (when they can) kill people they call racists.”

    And they ought to be… accused, persecuted and mistreated, because they do those things first. No sane man would love anyone who hates him to live with him. Harmony doesn’t work that way.

  27. Frater Pan says:

    @Hashtali

    “After a while it became clear we would get nowhere because he belongs to a different race…”

    We know that for sure because race is not just the past and present but also the future. So whether we share the same common ancestor or not is irrelevant, since our offsprings will definitely form two separate, visually different and spiritually irreconcilable races. You can tell that your race is inferior to my race because it has failed for 2000 years to spiritually convert my race.

    “After few thousands years very few people are Christians. So, up to 2000 years of intense propaganda, threats, torture, bribes, kidnappings, rape and executions, total control of educational institutions and medias, and most of us STILL are NOT Christians. You see that the Christians argue that Europe is overrun by muslims because we’re no longer Christians, we’ve become liberals or atheists or whatever, but what they seem to forget is that nobody forced anybody to get rid of Christianity. Nobody put a gun to the Christian’s head and said ‘you drop that religion or we’ll shoot you. Nobody bribed them, nobody threatened them, nobody did anything to the Christians to make them drop Christianity. So all those who think that Christianity can offer us some sort of spirituality or spiritual strength to resist this muslim religion, they are wrong. Christianity lost her influence in Europe because Europeans willingly, wittingly cast it aside. And why did they cast Christianity aside is because it is a worthless foreign religion that has nothing to do with our spirit or our blood. It is foreign to our nature and it is destructive for us. So, starting in the Renaissance when we found back to our pagan spirit. Hence the name “Renaissance” which means revival, it was a revival of our pagan spirit and the beginning of the fall of Christianity because Europeans were “allowed” (The Christians failed to keep the truth from them anymore) to gain access to information about their own culture, and when they did they rejected Christianity. At the same time when Europeans cast out Christianity aside like the wet towel, they are desperately trying to find back to their roots. And the problem today is that most people know that Christianity is worthless and alien to us, but they don’t really know what to replace it with, and THAT’S the problem. That’s why we see today liberals and feminists and atheists, agnostics and all sorts of different, no better alternatives to Christianity. What we need is to show them back to their roots, to the religion of their blood. To the religion that was crafted in theory own nature that was the result of their own blood and spirit that is the cultural heritage of Europe, of our European peoples

    Any tree without its roots will for sure wither and die…and when you know that, you know why Christianity was created in the first place.

    Our nature can not be suppressed forever. THE ONLY THING THEY CAN DO TO REMOVE PAGANISM IS TO REMOVE US. And they seem to be trying their best to achieve just that, with mass-immigration. You see, all we need to show our fellow Europeans back to their roots is to show them “Wotan”, so to speak: “Show Wotan to the people, and Wotan will be lit in its soul” -C.G. Jung. Show the people their own heritage, and they will recognize it as their own and remember what they once were: proud, happy, healthy and prosperous Pagan Europeans.”

    About Christianity as a Wall against Islam, The New Renaissance:
    https://youtu.be/rZ87iWfJdpw
    https://youtu.be/eKWjylEA7mc

    “At the time, Hitler had better things to do than give primary focus on domestic issues related to skin color given Germany’s demographics.”

    I take this as your indirect admission that Hitler was not an anti-racist since anti-racist is by definition one who opposes racism, not the one who has better things to do than oppose racism.

    “Hitler would’ve, correctly, regarded most NSDAP members as not being equal with himself (why else would he be leader after all?), but he didn’t exclude them. So this has nothing to do with equality. Rather it has to do with the fact that there weren’t any dogs volunteering to join the NSDAP, and there was no practical need to recruit them.”

    Practical is not moral (which Aryanists hold to be absolute). If Hitler was moral in Aryanist (twisted) way he would have done everything to persuade if not the animals than at least ‘Rhineland Bastards’ (you cannot say he didn’t have them) to enlist NSDAP, give them leading positions and order his (real) German blood-comrades to worship them as gods, kneel before them like modern American Christians before negroes.

    Africa back than was as full of negroes as it is now and what’s the first thing you do when you have a Jewish problem? You invite some negroes and arabs to breed with. That will solve your Jewish problem. So why didn’t he?

    “Given the ethnic demographics of Germany at the time, there was no practical need to attempt recruiting people of a variety of skin colros.”

    A real anti-racist would have been “morally” concerned by the lack of Africans in his country, not by doing what is practical. The “moral” thing to do would be to send ships to Africa and Levant, promise them white women. The “moral” thing to do would be invade other European countries for not importing negroes and than force them to do the “moral” thing and genocide them if they resist or actively show enough enthusiasm.

    “I have no idea…have better things to do…”

    Is that the best Aryanist proof for Hitler’s anti-racism?

    “The communist Jews also tried to take power from the bourgeoisie and, apparently, give it to the proles. Was the National Socialist response to try to restore power to the bourgeoisie?”

    Race is organic, wealth status is not. The rich can become poor and the poor can become rich but a negro cannot ever become a non-negro on chromosomal level just like a man cannot become a woman on chromosomal level, but just a man without a penis. A negro can kill a white man but he cannot ever be a White man.

    You cannot provide the Third Reich source which states that NS policy on class within the nation is or ought to be extended to the race. That’s just your speculation.

    “I disagree with Rosenberg, but let’s contextualize his view. Early twentieth-century Western historians were not very knowledgeable about Aryan diffusion in Africa…At the moment we have much more knowledge about Aryan diffusion in Africa, and there is ongoing research. We also know there are “black” Aryans, both going by theory, as well as through personal interactions. ”

    By using that twisted logic I could say that Hitler did’nt knew about Pagan European spirituality as much as Burzum does today and that if he knew more he’d be a Pagan. You can disagree with Rosenberg, but Rosenberg was a National Socialist while you are not.

    “Hitler did not endorse Rosenberg’s The Myth of the Twentieth Century.”

    Nor did he burned it as an anti-racist would.

    “I believe he realized Rosenberg had the right attitude, but the incorrect (or limited) knowledge.”

    Where can we find Hitler correcting Rosenberg’s knowledge about race?

    “Hitler personally did not discriminate against “blacks”, and in fact asked one of his SS-Untersturmfuehrers to marry a Mauritanian princess…”

    Source?

  28. Frater Pan says:

    Either delete all my posts or none. This way you give the wrong impression I am unable to debunk and expose you.

  29. Hashtali says:

    @FP

    “We know that for sure because race is not just the past and present but also the future. So whether we share the same common ancestor or not is irrelevant, since our offsprings will definitely form two separate, visually different and spiritually irreconcilable races. You can tell that your race is inferior to my race because it has failed for 2000 years to spiritually convert my race.”

    Your race does has not spiritually converted mine either since the Neolithic first spread into Europe. Were this not true, there would be no Aryanists around. So the same argument would apply the other way, ending up with contradictory positions. The truth of the matter is the differences in race are genetic, and will not be wiped out except for genetically. Aryanists have no intention to convert you spiritually while leaving your genes behind; sooner or later, the Gentile genes will be wiped off the face of the Earth.

    “I take this as your indirect admission that Hitler was not an anti-racist since anti-racist is by definition one who opposes racism, not the one who has better things to do than oppose racism.”

    I told you how he addressed racism in a more pressing matter (colonialism), so fuck off.

    “A real anti-racist would have been “morally” concerned by the lack of Africans in his country, not by doing what is practical. The “moral” thing to do would be to send ships to Africa and Levant, promise them white women. The “moral” thing to do would be invade other European countries for not importing negroes and than force them to do the “moral” thing and genocide them if they resist or actively show enough enthusiasm.”

    Find one place on the main site where it’s stated that the absolute moral thing is to increase immigration of people from Africa and then I’ll address your argument.

    “Is that the best Aryanist proof for Hitler’s anti-racism?”

    You continue to ignore all the other arguments, so I’m not going to waste my time.

    “Race is organic, wealth status is not.”

    Were wealth organic, should we then declare war on people of a certain income level?

    “You cannot provide the Third Reich source which states that NS policy on class within the nation is or ought to be extended to the race. That’s just your speculation.”

    National unity was demanded on all levels. That extends to ethnicity.

    “It is all one to us what their origin was, as long as they can work to the benefit of our nation. That is the deciding factor. For we did not abolish class distinctions in order to set up new ones, we did away with them in order to be able to set the nation as a whole in their place. … Today there are simply citizens of the German state, men and women whose value is judged simply by their achievements.” – Adolf Hitler

    “By using that twisted logic I could say that Hitler did’nt knew about Pagan European spirituality as much as Burzum does today and that if he knew more he’d be a Pagan. You can disagree with Rosenberg, but Rosenberg was a National Socialist while you are not.”

    I could prove to you that Hitler’s spiritual attitude would’ve still kept him opposed to European paganism. Can you prove Rosenberg would be spiritually opposed to “black” Aryans? We can prove the opposite.

    “Where can we find Hitler correcting Rosenberg’s knowledge about race?”

    The point was that Hitler wouldn’t have had the evidence for “black” Aryan diffusion at the moment because nobody did. But in regards to a correction on the topic of race, here is one example from Hitler: “one could not from the race infer the capacity but one had to infer from the capacity the racial fitness for the task.”

    “Source?”

    http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=192708
    You can look more into it yourself now that you know the name.

    “Either delete all my posts or none. This way you give the wrong impression I am unable to debunk and expose you.”

    I only delete your useless ones. I haven’t deleted anything for this topic yet. If you want me to delete all your posts from now on, that’s fine by me, but please stop posting. It’s annoying to delete a post only to see it come back half an hour later.

  30. Hashtali says:

    @Ostmann

    Welcome back! How is the project we discussed a while back going?

  31. Ossendowski says:

    Call to arms for Germany issued:

    https://trueleftblog.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/wake-up-germany/

    Any German visitors here, report in droves!

  32. Frater Pan says:

    “Your race does has not spiritually converted mine either since the Neolithic first spread into Europe. Were this not true, there would be no Aryanists around. So the same argument would apply the other way, ending up with contradictory positions.”

    No. You are unconverted because you are unworthy and because our ancestral religion is for us alone, as Jewish religion is for the Jew. We have no obligation to convert aliens. In fact that would have been an insult to the gods and/or ancestral spirits. Your religion commands you to convert us but your mud ancestors were too incompetent to implemet it because they were inferior to our ancestors. Gentiles have dumped your religion and jews have turned it into their own instrument. So how pathetic can you get? Your ‘aryanism’ (islamism/niggerism) is just a feable attempt to walk around your defeat and approaching extinction.

    “The truth of the matter is the differences in race are genetic, and will not be wiped out except for genetically.”

    Genetic science can only tell us that you had a male ancestor from this or that haplogroup. But there can be any number of female ancestors from other haplogroups amongst your ancestors. In fact ALL of your foremothers can come from OTHER haplogroups, but you STILL have the same haplogroup as the males of that one line of males. If your supposedly Aryan immigrant (neolithic negro or a Christian Levantine) ancestor of haplogroup “X” had a bastard child with a white woman of haplogroup “Y”, that bastard is of haplogroup “X”, but racially speaking is only 50% like his negro father. Than if the bastard too has a quadroon child with a woman from haplogroup “Y” that quadroon will be of haplogroup “X”, but racially speaking he will be only 25% like his negro grandfather. If this process repeats itself, after 10 generations the sons in the line will still be of haplogroup “X”, but will racially speaking 0.1% like the original “Aryan” father.

    1 Generation: 50%
    2 Generation: 25%
    3 Generation: 12.5%
    4 Generation: 6.25%
    5 Generation: 3.13%
    6 Generation: 1.56%
    7 Generation: 0.78%
    8 Generation: 0.39%
    9 Generation: 0.2%
    19 Generation: 0.1%

    You will be of haplogroup “X”, but will racially speaking be 99.9% identical to individuals of haplogroup “Y”. In other words your haplogroup tells you almost nothing whatsoever about your racial makeup. If you want to know which race you belong to, you are better off just looking into a mirror.

    “Aryanists have no intention to convert you spiritually while leaving your genes behind”

    That’s only after they realized it can’t be done.

    “sooner or later, the Gentile genes will be wiped off the face of the Earth.”

    Only wealth and civilized domestication (state-enforced universalist religion and/or ideology) can do that, but the system is in crisis. That’s your problem. As you noticed yourself we have started to reject your “antidote” (islam) and become more and more barbaric and unrully. The citties migrants inhabit allong with Jewish and Aryan elites are like death traps for them, as they are for any of our men unfortunate to live there. The brown citty mob will have a lesser chance to survive in the long run that Whites in South Africa. To illustrate this on the American example with which you’re probably more familiar with:

    “The United States is in decline. While not all major shocks to the system will be devastating, when the right one comes along, the outcome may be dramatic. Not all explosives are the same. We all know you have to be careful with dynamite. Best to handle it gently and not smoke while you’re around it. Semtex is different. You can drop it. You can throw it. You can put it in the fire. Nothing will happen. Nothing until you put the right detonator in it, that is. To me, the US – and most of the supposedly free West – increasingly looks like a truck being systematically filled with Semtex. But it’s easy to counter cries of alarm with the fact that the truck is stable – because it’s true: you can hurl more boxes into the back without any real danger. Absent the right detonator, it is no more dangerous than a truckload of mayonnaise. But add the right detonator and you’re just one click away from complete devastation. We can see how fragile the U.S. is now by considering just four tendencies. We can see how fragile the U.S. is now by considering just four tendencies.

    1. Destruction of farms and reliable food source
    …The shops have nothing more than a few days’ stock. A simple break in that supply line would clear the shops out in days…
    2. Weak economic system
    …Fiat economies always collapse…
    3. Americans increasingly on mind-altering drugs
    …These are the type of FDA-approved narcotics lone gunmen are frequently associated with, and their psychoses often attributed to a forced or sudden withdrawal from such drugs…If the logistics system fails, there’s no more supply…
    4. Morals in decline
    …During the objective hardship of the 1930s, there was surprisingly little crime. People were brought up with a conception of morals and right and wrong. Frugality and prudence were prized virtues. Communities were generally fairly cohesive. Relative to then, society today is undisciplined, unrealistic and selfish…and many other countries organised after the same template – do not look explosive, doesn’t mean they won’t blow up. Whereas 80 years ago we could absorb major shocks, today we cannot…

    https://www.rt.com/op-edge/318986-america-bomb-society-crisis/

    I know that Aryanism strives to provide good remmedies for their bastard breed but since the Jews poison them so much and since we hate them so much, and since they’re so disunited the chances are that they (you) are the ones that will end up exterminated, not us.

  33. Frater Pan says:

    “I told you how he addressed racism in a more pressing matter (colonialism), so fuck off.”

    The colonialism and racism are not the same thing. Colonialism (and slavery) are not racist enough because the other race survives within the same state/empire with you, or – in the case of slavery even under the same roof with you and your family. Hitler’s rejection of collonialism and slavery was probably motivated by that particular concern.

    If you own a slave you never know if some of your less stern ofsprings will be persuaded or forced to liberate his slaves (and thus create a multi-racial society) or end up overpowerd by the rebelled slaves. The best slave is a dead slave. I’m a racist 100% and reject slavery (except perhaps within death camps where alien intruders or captured enemies are worked to death).

  34. LuciferOverZion says:

    @ Frater Pan

    You have already shown us your true colors. The only thing we need to do is fight the misinformation you bring.

    Y-Haplogroup is not the only trait we care about, there are many others. For example the closer one’s face is to the golden ratio the more Aryan it looks.

  35. @Frater – Last year, haplo-groups were mentioned, the question being could there be Aryan Haplo-group vs non-Aryan ones, and it was categorically stated…

    “Is it possible that some modern-day haplogroups were more common among the first Aryans? Sure, though I have no idea which they are. On the other hand, if my great-great-great-and-so-on grandfather on my father’s side were a non-Aryan with a “non-Aryan haplogroup” and every other single ancestor of mine were an Aryan, I would still end up with a non-Aryan Y-haplogroup even if I were the most Aryan individual in all other regards. In other words, haplogroups are useless for determining Aryans and for Aryanization.”

    So it was said that haplo-groups were useless for determining true race, but then we also say that skin colour alone gives no true indication of race. Two individuals could both be “white-skinned” (so to speak) but be quite different in their characteristics, both physically and intellectually/spiritually/morally. These characteristics are far weightier.

  36. John Johnson says:

    “You will be of haplogroup “X”, but will racially speaking be 99.9% identical to individuals of haplogroup “Y”. In other words your haplogroup tells you almost nothing whatsoever about your racial makeup.”

    Which is why an individual’s haplogroup is as irrelevant to us as their eye color. The only heritable traits we care about are those which have an effect on nobility.

    “If you want to know which race you belong to, you are better off just looking into a mirror.”

    We have an even better way:

    “We do not conclude from a man’s physical type his ability, but rather from his achievements his race.” – Adolf Hitler

  37. Ostmann says:

    Hello Isaac, I see the symbol of Your Aussi movement has some similarity to the that of the ‘Black Sun’. BTW, the Flag of the German territory of Neu-Schwabenland in Antarctica (actually a state or land like Bavaria or Silesia) also has the southern cross on it, in a corner the middle beeing a hakenkreuz.

  38. Ostmann says:

    Greetings Hashtali. The only project is to prepare for…And keeping an eye on the German situation from street-level reporting and the jewish inter-denominational cat-fight in Syria and the M.E.

  39. @Ostmann – Greetings… Nice to see your new site. Yes, I kind of modelled it after Black Sun, mostly wanting something solar and kind of swastika-like without being too obvious. It is interesting about the Antarctic flag with the Southern Cross.

  40. Ostmann says:

    @ Isaac, not mine- but fine, just promoting. Regards.

  41. Tom says:

    This is the most ridiculous website that I’ve ever come across.

    You can add as many swastikas as you wish, add as many Third Reich photos as you wish, and use as much NS terminology as you wish to include pseudo-edgy threats about Dakhau, but your Bolshevist ideology is clear to anyone with any education whatsoever.

    “We owe it to Hitler to defend Germany from the 21st century Identitarians…”

    Seriously, this is a truly hilarious website.

    It gets most entertaining when you attempt to explain the population of the refugee crisis. So, Merkel invites the “antidote” but at the same time wants to encourage the failure of the antidote? Europe must suffer the presence of Arabs for generations because that will work to expel Jewry? If the plan were true, it would be ill conceived and an ultimate failure. However, the truth is that it is your ridiculous bolshevik rationalization whose prime effect, were it true, would be to repress the German people to the end of having them be displaced with Muslim Arabs.

    If you add at least one more swastika to the website, though, I think that you might convince some Europeans to cuckold themselves.

  42. LuciferOverZion says:

    (* By Marxism, we refer strictly to theories that include advocacy against private property/business, against the worth of the individual, and against religion. By communism, we refer strictly to policies of dispossession of the bourgeois class in favour of the proletariat class, of mandatory atheism, and of “unmasking” and “re-educating” perceived dissenters via gulag torture. We do not partake in the present-day far-right neurosis of smearing anything and everything outside of the far-right (e.g. universalist religions, non-racism, non-sexism, non-homophobia) as “Marxist” or “communist”, which is utter nonsense. As a matter of fact, Cold War era communist countries tended to be far more socially conservative than capitalist countries, so that it was common for people living in communist countries to fantasize about capitalist countries as socially liberal paradises. It is innacurate to refer to freedom of migration as “communist”, as Cold War era communist countries did not even allow their own citizens to leave, let alone foreigners to settle in large numbers. It is also inaccurate to refer to the welfare state as “communist”, as communism assigns everyone capable of working to full-time work of the government’s choosing. It is certainly inaccurate to refer to LGBT mainstreaming as “communist”, as communists considered homosexuality to be a symptom of bourgeois decadance, and threw homosexuals into gulags. And it is totally inaccurate to refer to positive opinions towards Islam as “communist”, for obvious reasons!)

    http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-communism/

    You can thank Britain, the US and other white countries that practiced your beloved segregation for the Third Reich’s failure.

  43. AS says:

    http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Limit-the-number-of-migrants-allowed-to-enter-Germany-Jewish-leader-tells-Merkel-435130

    Josef Schuster, the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, said that quotas are necessary in light of the fact that many of the million refugees expected to arrive in Germany this year “come from cultures where the hatred of Jews and intolerance is an integral part.”

  44. LuciferOverZion says:

    If our countries of citizenship go to war against ISIS what shall we do?

  45. AS says:

    @LOZ

    Focus on defending your local Muslim communities from attacks by Islamophobes who would try to conflate them with ISIS (you will need to organize a paramilitary squad to do this – talk to Pandorastop), and promote the idea that if Israel had never existed, we would have none of these problems:

    http://aryanism.net/wp-content/uploads/ISIL.jpg

    Then point out that Israel only exists because Jewish identity exists, thus making identitarianism the true culprit.

  46. AS says:

    Over 200 arson attacks on refugee homes, only 4 convictions:

    https://www.rt.com/news/324854-222-attacks-uninvestigated-germany/

    A dutiful government would sentence every arsonist to death by burning, and televise the executions. All property of the arsonists would be confiscated by the state and go into the the funds for rebuilding the homes they destroyed, or (if appropriate) used directly for housing refugees. Merkel, of course, is too busy telling the refugees not to be “anti-Semitic” to care about their safety.

  47. Cat says:

    How come noone ever replied to the 1. Comment of “Slave”? I’d been interested much to hear what you all had to say to his Arguments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>