Support Elin Ersson!

Hey, ProudIncelistani, just this one individual alone (who, yes, happens to be female, though we would have felt no need to draw particular attention to her gender if you hadn’t turned up) we hold in higher regard than every Incels member in the world combined (if you want to prove me wrong, then you go and do something similar for refugees and post the mainstream news link when you are done):

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/25/swedish-student-plane-protest-stops-mans-deportation-afghanistan

A lone student activist on board a plane at Gothenburg airport has prevented the deportation of an Afghan asylum seeker from Sweden by refusing to sit down until the man was removed from the flight.

Her successful protest, footage of which spread rapidly across the internet, shines a spotlight on domestic opposition to Sweden’s tough asylum regime, at a time when immigration and asylum are topping the agenda of a general election campaign in which the far right is polling strongly.

“I hope that people start questioning how their country treats refugees,” Elin Ersson, 21, told the Guardian in an interview. “We need to start seeing the people whose lives our immigration [policies] are destroying.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/25/swedish-plane-protester-elin-ersson-interview-afghanistan

Swedish plane protester Elin Ersson: ‘I knew I couldn’t back down – I had to do what I could’

This September, Sweden will hold a general election, and immigration has already dominated the debate. Polls have shown strong support for the anti-immigration party Sweden Democrats, which has links to white supremacists and neo-Nazi groups. Ersson is concerned the country is shifting to the populist far right.

The tragic postscript is that she believes the young man she was originally trying to stop getting deported was taken to Stockholm and put on a flight there. “This is how deportations in Sweden work. The people involved know nothing and they are not allowed to reach out to their lawyers or family,” she says in a text the next day. “My ultimate goal is to end deportations to Afghanistan.”

To Ersson, besides offering you our sincere praise for taking a stand, our advice is the same as always: what if the Sweden Democrats do come to power in a few months’ time, or at any point in the future? Or what if the other parties in Sweden adopt their enough of their policies (as they have already started doing as the election approaches) as to become indistinguishable from them in practice? What if, either way, Sweden one day becomes like Hungary, just as Italy (only a few years ago the most pro-refugee country in the EU) has sadly become in the blink of an eye? The state will then not care about your pacifistic protests against deporting refugees any more than the IDF cared about Rachel Corrie’s (oh shit, PI, another female!) pacifistic protest against demolishing homes. You, just like every other leftist, need to be as well armed as possible so you can physically put bullets through rightists when this becomes – as I predict it will – the only way to effectively protect refugees. Are you and your cohorts ready to do this? If not, how long until you become ready? Because the clock is ticking. (Again, look at Italy: the anti-refugee state is now violently turning away refugees at the coastline, but pro-refugee activists are not killing the coastguard Rehabs, therefore refugees are dying:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/11/pietro-bartolo-lampedusa-doctor-migrant-deaths-mediterranean-slaughter-innocents )

You say your ultimate goal is to end deportations to Afghanistan. Very well. You say you will not back down and have to do what you can. Very well. Then please believe me when I warn that the only realistic way to achieve your ultimate goal is ruthless, relentless Ahimsa against the far-right until every last one of them is permanently wiped out. If you do not believe me, then do not complain if you fail.

(And for PI’s record, I have zero interest in having sex with Ersson, nor did I write this blog post with the motive of improving my chances of having sex with her. FFS, even if sex with her were the only way to persuade her to buy firearms(!!!), I would send RP to get it done rather than go myself. And no, I do not want to watch them either. And yes, I am saying all this mainly to illustrate the level of discussion that PI wants to drag us down to.)

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to Support Elin Ersson!

  1. Hypnotix says:

    It’s ridiculous how bad this incel bullshit is, how diametrically opposed to nobility and how misdirecting and focused on irrelevant crap, and yet PI still thinks it has “common points” with Aryanism. He’s even using the alt-right’s go-to “insult” to refer to Aryanists now, yet not long ago, he refered to us as “gods” on the Discord server…

    By the way, AS, can you take a look at the contact-form email account? There’s something that needs your attention.

  2. These Incels are just proving Freud and the Jewish worldview correct by putting sexual intercourse in the forefront of human existence. Read some Jung or Serrano and FFS, do some interesting things with your life, you know, become an interesting person, and you might just get laid.

    Or better yet, you’ll realize it’s not that important. Direct your bodily energies toward higher goals.

  3. AS says:

    @Hypnotix & Miecz

    “PI still thinks it has “common points” with Aryanism”

    “These Incels are just proving Freud and the Jewish worldview correct”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eve

    In the Jewish book The Alphabet of Ben-Sira, Eve is Adam’s “second wife”, where Lilith is his first. In this alternate version, which entered Europe from the East in the 6th century, it suggests that Lilith was created at the same time, from the same earth (Sumerian Ki), as Adam’s equal, similar to the Babylonian Lilitu, Sumerian Ninlil wife of Enlil. Lilith refuses to sleep or serve under Adam. When Adam tried to force her into the “inferior” position, she flew away from Eden into the air where she copulated with demons, conceiving hundreds more each day (a derivation of the Arabic djinn). God sent three angels after her, who threatened to kill her brood if she refused to return to Adam. She refuses, leaving God to make a second wife for Adam, except this time from his rib.

    The creation of Eve, according to Rabbi Joshua, is that: “God deliberated from what member He would create woman, and He reasoned with Himself thus: I must not create her from Adam’s head, for she would be a proud person, and hold her head high. If I create her from the eye, then she will wish to pry into all things; if from the ear, she will wish to hear all things; if from the mouth, she will talk much; if from the heart, she will envy people; if from the hand, she will desire to take all things; if from the feet, she will be a gadabout. Therefore I will create her from the member which is hid, that is the rib, which is not even seen when man is naked.”

    the Apostle Paul promoted the silence and submission of women due to Eve’s deception by the serpent

    Eve’s being taken from his side implies not only her secondary role in the conjugal state (1 Corinthians 11:9), but also emphasizes the intimate union between husband and wife, and the dependence of her to him.

    Basically Incels are Adam types who want women to be subservient. By demanding a return to female subservience, they in effect worship Yahweh whether they are aware of it or not. The part in bold is the story that gets endlessly retold on Incels.me over and over again every day! Incels perpetually re-experience what Adam experienced when Lilith rejected him, and respond by demanding Eve. They will side with Yahweh if that is what it will take for them to get Eve.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Bible

    New Testament Professor Ben Witherington III says the Hebrew Bible is a predominantly patriarchal document from a patriarchal age. It “limited women’s roles and functions to the home, and severely restricted: (1) their rights of inheritance, (2) their choice of relationship, (3) their ability to pursue a religious education or fully participate in synagogue, (4) and limited their freedom of movement.”[12]

    New Testament scholar Ben Witherington III says “Jesus broke with both biblical and rabbinic traditions that restricted women’s roles in religious practices, and He rejected attempts to devalue the worth of a woman

    Scholars agree certain texts attributed to Paul and the Pauline epistles have provided much support for the view of the role of women as subservient.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_patriarchy

    the biblical patriarchy movement is “committed to preserving as much of the patriarchal structure of Old Testament law as possible.”[7]

    It is fairly obvious that Incels belong to the Tanakh-Paul a.k.a. anti-Jesus camp.

    I am known for never underestimating enemies. We should not underestimate patriarchists, who form a significant subdivision of the right-wing backlash. Just as with ethical arguments against racism, the ethical arguments against sexism (which are mostly the same arguments anyway e.g. treat people as individuals, imagine being on the receiving end, etc.) used to be so obvious that it had become unnecessary to repeat them, with the result that many people have never studied them and possibly don’t even know what the arguments are. Just as with WNs, the patriarchists now turn up and behave as though no such arguments exist, and become successful in recruiting. As much as it insults our intelligence to have to re-fight battles that earlier generations of leftists had already won , the cost of not doing so is too high.

  4. @AS @Miecz @Hypnotix

    “Hey, ProudIncelistani, just this one individual alone (who, yes, happens to be female, though we would have felt no need to draw particular attention to her gender if you hadn’t turned up) we hold in higher regard than every Incels member in the world combined”
    Watch the tables turn.

    http://aryanism.net/culture/aesthetics/food/

    Be prepared to eat your own words. Turn them into gruel, if you can. Your days of cucking to women are numbered.

    “if you want to prove me wrong, then you go and do something similar for refugees and post the mainstream news link when you are done”
    Hah! Better yet, I’m willing to go one step further! Why not an World Empire called “Incelistan”, where no such wars to produce refugees can happen in the first place be established? If you are sincere in your efforts to end this war and stop the crisis, then join in arms with me, lest I see your real intent…

    “And for PI’s record, I have zero interest in having sex with Ersson, nor did I write this blog post with the motive of improving my chances of having sex with her.”
    Where did I say you had that intent? Even you know it’s over, you’re just cucking to foids so that Aryanism can be more “palatable”. What’s next?! Condemning Hitler so we’re more “palatable”?! It is the task of all Incelistani Aryanists to save Aryanism! INCELISTAN ZINDABAD! UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY!

    “FFS, even if sex with her were the only way to persuade her to buy firearms(!!!), I would send RP to get it done rather than go myself”
    Watch as the next ER uses that fiREarm she won’t wield against hER. That man will be CHOosing to MAke a diffEReNCe for a bettER futuRE…

    “And no, I do not want to watch them either.”
    Sure. Don’t you know that I myself am Narendra Modi?

    Your points here are points that YOU would normally have a problem with! If a jew tried to argue against sterilizing/detaining jews by citing that Emil Maurice was a jew, you’d respond in a sober and logical manner. If a gypsy tried to use some influential gypsy to argue against their sterilization/detainment, you’d laugh! But when it comes to foids, your bhagwati, you toss Aryanism itself out the window! What makes this case so different?! Now you see why we Incelistani’s have to be here?!

    “and yet PI still thinks it has “common points” with Aryanism.”
    Not only are most of the points common, I now see the task is even more dire to save Aryanism. I cannot leave; Aryanism must be saved!

    “He’s even using the alt-right’s go-to “insult” to refer to Aryanists now”
    Aryanist: “I support Hitler!”
    Moron: “Both you and the Alt-Right support Hitler! You’re a tribalist!”

    See the oddity there?

    “refer to Aryanists now, yet not long ago, he refered to us as “gods” on the Discord server…”
    Bro, I had no idea the Gods were this cucked. If the Gods refuse to save Aryanism, then perhaps their subject must!

    “These Incels are just proving Freud and the Jewish worldview correct by putting sexual intercourse in the forefront of human existence.”
    Not quite. We already knew that foids use tribalism and sex as control methods; The jews are slaves to it.

    “Read some Jung or Serrano”
    I read both before even being an Incelistani kek

    “and you might just get laid.”
    If you are a sub8, no amount of self-improvement will let you escape the betabux realm. If you are a Chad, you don’t even NEED to self-improve!

    “Or better yet, you’ll realize it’s not that important. Direct your bodily energies toward higher goals.”
    I can multitask. In Incelistan, tribalists and women are both screwed. Why choose between jew or WN to sterilize? Why not both?

    “It is fairly obvious that Incels belong to the Tanakh-Paul a.k.a. anti-Jesus camp.”
    If a jew told me that 2 + 2 = 4, I’d agree. If a jew told me that tribalism is right, I’d disagree. Even Aryanists can agree on basic things with jews, like “1+2 = 3″, or “The sky is blue” or “Bananas are yellow”. You don’t need to disagree with LITERALLY EVERYTHING your opponent says.

  5. @ ProudIncelistein
    You remind me of the guys on that weird planet in Alien 3. Anyway, stay strong and just when you reach your lowest point, a glorious Valkyrie just might save you if SHE sees good in your heart and soul.

    In the mean time… @ Everyone
    I’ve come up with a revolutionary basic method of debating the likes of Richard “Big Dick” Spencer, Andy “Asian Fetish” Anglin (if he’s still kickin’), and Milo “Not Halal” Yiannopoulous.
    https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/debating-the-alt-right-cartoon.jpg

    Ok, off to teach my all-female student Tai Chi class, I go.

  6. Lucius Rhine says:

    Gender Bolshevism is for what Incelistan strives.

  7. AS says:

    @PI

    “If a jew tried to argue against sterilizing/detaining jews by citing that Emil Maurice was a jew, you’d respond in a sober and logical manner. If a gypsy tried to use some influential gypsy to argue against their sterilization/detainment, you’d laugh! But when it comes to foids, your bhagwati, you toss Aryanism itself out the window! What makes this case so different?!”

    Because women are not a tribe in the first place. In fact, you yourself carelessly admitted this:

    In Incelistan, tribalists and women are both screwed.

    which would seem to imply that many women are indeed not tribalists.

    We of course oppose matriarchists (e.g. men not allowed to vote/earn their own income/go outdoors unaccompanied/etc.):

    https://dogsharon.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/a-mans-place-is-in-the-kitchen/

    but matriarchists are just the mirror image of patriarchists. If you claim that we cannot effectively oppose matriarchists without opposing women as a whole, then by the same logic we cannot effectively oppose patriarchists without opposing men as a whole. Yet you do not ask us to oppose men as a whole. Why not?

    The nearest we come to general antagonism towards women is that we oppose femininity: we believe that more feminine women are worse than less feminine women. But at the same time we oppose masculinity: we believe that more masculine men are worse than less masculine men. Therefore at no point do we favour one side over the other. What we want is a society of minimal sexual dimorphism.

    http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/pix/sexual_dimorphism.gif

    https://i.warosu.org/data/tg/img/0356/71/1413927084027.jpg

    “Even Aryanists can agree on basic things with jews, like “1+2 = 3?, or “The sky is blue” or “Bananas are yellow”. You don’t need to disagree with LITERALLY EVERYTHING your opponent says.”

    Yes, but “1+2 = 3?, “The sky is blue” and “Bananas are yellow” are not VALUE statements, whereas patriarchy in the Tanakh is a policy recommendation consequential to implicit values. If the Tanakh says: “Men are on average more interested than women in inventing new machines”, I would agree. But I do not VALUE a world with more and more machines. Therefore I do not want patriarchy (which would likely lead to more funds being allocated towards machine research).

    More pertinently, the Tanakh recommends patriarchy precisely because women are on average less tribalist than men (which is even what we expect biologically, as women are on average more neotenous):

    https://brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/ (top row, middle vs right)

    https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/original-size/images/print-edition/20160611_EUC640.png

    and the Tanakh VALUES tribalism, hence prudently recommends patriarchy as a way to secure tribalism. Whereas Jesus opposed patriarchy, not because he thought women would be just as reliably tribalist as men, but because he was opposed to tribalism itself.

  8. @Miecz @AS @Lucius Rhine

    “Because women are not a tribe in the first place. In fact, you yourself carelessly admitted this:

    In Incelistan, tribalists and women are both screwed.

    which would seem to imply that many women are indeed not tribalists.”

    http://aryanism.net/about/glossary/

    If we look at the definitions of “Aryan” and “Arhat”, both of them imply Nobility and Morality. But “Arhat” is on a totally different scale from “Aryan”, hence the tip of “Use Sparingly!”. In the same way, both “Tribalist” and “Female” imply ignobility and evil, but “Female” is on a wholly different level of evil. A tribalist will fight the Aryan for the most part (excluding Jews in SOME, but NOT ALL cases) externally, rather than breaking it down from the inside, yet internal destruction is a specialty of femoids. They, being too weak, cowardly, and pathetic to destroy it from the outside for their greedy cause, will take to breaking from the inside. This r/Braincels post should help:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Braincels/comments/93gsnh/rbraincels_in_a_nutshell_xpost_rincelutopia/

    “We of course oppose matriarchists (e.g. men not allowed to vote/earn their own income/go outdoors unaccompanied/etc.):

    https://dogsharon.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/a-mans-place-is-in-the-kitchen/

    but matriarchists are just the mirror image of patriarchists. If you claim that we cannot effectively oppose matriarchists without opposing women as a whole, then by the same logic we cannot effectively oppose patriarchists without opposing men as a whole. Yet you do not ask us to oppose men as a whole. Why not?”

    Because Masculinity is good, whereas femininity is bad. Masculinity is the call to action and struggle, femininity is the parasitic cancer that kills the innocent.

    You may ask: “But what about Masculine tribalists like Conan the Barbarian?”

    The response is that their Masculinity is fine, their tribalism is not. You can look at Masculine anti-tribalists like Bhagat Singh, who’s Masculinity only helped push Hindustan to it’s independence. Femininity is the great evil, Masculinity is the savior. Death to all women.

    You also seem to think that femininity is simply a mindset, but in reality, those XX chromosomes (I’d like to see you fight for trannies kek) is the Seal of Satan himself.

    “The nearest we come to general antagonism towards women is that we oppose femininity: we believe that more feminine women are worse than less feminine women.”
    The problem is that they are women. Femininity is just a catalyst to their evil.

    “But at the same time we oppose masculinity: we believe that more masculine men are worse than less masculine men.”
    You have no case against Masculinity.

    “http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/pix/sexual_dimorphism.gif”
    We should go Parabolic, not Linear. There are countless cases in evolutionary history of species regaining lost traits, same thing here. (No, I’m not supporting Nature, I’m just stating a fact)

    “https://i.warosu.org/data/tg/img/0356/71/1413927084027.jpg”
    This one isn’t opening for me. Are there any alternative links for this?

    “Yes, but “1+2 = 3?, “The sky is blue” and “Bananas are yellow” are not VALUE statements,”
    Then take things you’d agree with the false left on. G. (Obviously you don’t agree with the false left, but there are many things that you even stated in your articles that you share common).

    “whereas patriarchy in the Tanakh is a policy recommendation consequential to implicit values.”
    See above.

    “precisely because women are on average less tribalist than men (which is even what we expect biologically, as women are on average more neotenous):”
    https://gfycat.com/gifs/detail/SoulfulDisgustingIslandwhistler

    Women are the biggest tribalists of all. They create tribes as a way of sucking up resources from thirsty betacucks and put them to war. Women should be given no “rights”, “freedom” or even “mercy”. Also, fun fact: All foids worship white cock. JBW, baby. If that ain’t tribalism, then nothing is…

    “https://brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/ (top row, middle vs right)”
    If a WN told you “Muh h’whites is higher IQ then them blackies!” then you’d respond correctly. If a jew told you “Muh (((chosen peepulz))) is higher IQ then all u goyim!”, then you’d respond correctly. But when your bhagwati are under attack, Aryanism is the last thing to defend in your mind. Foids didn’t vote for Clinton because they were more noble or any of that horseshit, they voted because of the “first femoid president” crap. Again, more in-group preference, what’s that called again? Not too Noble if you ask me…

    “Tanakh VALUES tribalism, hence prudently recommends patriarchy as a way to secure tribalism.”
    Patriarchy in reality destroys tribalist societies, because in no way is a society created by foids to leech off of betacucks anything to keep. I’ve argued this before, see it in my WN debate thread. It’s just that Patriarchy is a good model for keeping alive good Nations, femininity can only kill everything. Just because the Jews said something, doesn’t mean it’s correct.

    ” a glorious Valkyrie just might save you if SHE sees good in your heart and soul.”
    God’s a dude, he on my side. I don’t need no Valkyrie roastie whore…

    “Gender Bolshevism is for what Incelistan strives.”
    Incelistan is the only way to freedom.

    All of you KNOW that all women are evil, yet choose to spare them from the same treatment as Jews, knowing that in both cases the subjects are both rotten to the core, why? You acknowledge sexual selection, hypergamy, and the overall evil that is in every woman, yet want to save them, why? If we brought up the genetic evil of Jews, you’re all up in arms against them, but when the Femoid Question is brought up before you, you fight to defend the ignobles against the evil Aryanist-Incelistanis. Why?

  9. AS says:

    @PI

    “Foids didn’t vote for Clinton because they were more noble or any of that horseshit, they voted because of the “first femoid president” crap.”

    I already knew you would say that, which is why I also linked to the results of Hofer vs van der Bellen (both male candidates), which you have unsurprisingly ignored. If you were correct, there should be no female bias in favour of van der Bellen. But there is. Therefore you are wrong.

    But even if you insist on discussing US results only, here is Romney vs Obama (both male candidates again):

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/156848/obama-remains-women-presidential-pick-romney-men.aspx

    My assessment of present-day voting patterns is in fact very similar to that of right-wingers:

    http://images.comfortingquotes.com/2014/06/wpid-quote-by-ann-coulter-if-we-took1.jpg

    http://images.comfortingquotes.com/2014/06/wpid-saying-from-ann-coulter-it-would-be1.jpg

    The only difference is that they want to win elections whereas I want them to lose elections.

    “Patriarchy in reality destroys tribalist societies”

    Every colonial power was patriarchical. If you were correct, the colonial era would never have happened. The colonial era happened. Therefore you are wrong.

    (On the other hand, the success of the Suffragette movement coincided with anti-colonialism gaining momentum. Pure coincidence? I doubt it.)

    “You have no case against Masculinity.”

    Masculinity is adulteration of Original Nobility (just as femininity is). Masculinity is, among other things, the reason why (male) Incels exist in the first place. Most eventual Incels did not mind celibacy back when they were young children, yet find it increasingly unbearable as they mature, when all they are actually experiencing is a mere CONTINUATION of the same lifestyle that they should have already become used to since childhood. The only thing that has changed is that they have become more masculine, hence it is their own masculinity which is to blame for their own suffering.

    And don’t get me started on this:

    https://www.plantbasednews.org/post/why-arent-more-men-vegan

    In fact, within the vegan community I have long criticized this type of propaganda:

    https://www.arespectfullife.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Vegan-Men-Have-13-HIGHER-Testosterone-Levels.-1-1024×512.png

    https://veganbetterplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Vegan-men-are-more-manly.jpg

    https://static1.i4u.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/main_image_large/images/2016/01/peta-super-bowl-50-ad.jpg

    I argue that instead of the cowardly False Left approach of trying to sell veganism to people who value masculinity, we should go with the radical True Left approach of admitting that veganism IS INDEED unmasculine (which is of course biologically true), but then make it positive by devaluing masculinity itself.

  10. John Peter says:

    @AS

    About Childcare :

    “”Judaism views the creator as fundamentally good (“But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, “Why did you make me like this?”” – Saul Paul of Tarsus), hence aims not at salvation from the creator but instead at reconciliation with him through obedience.”"

    In Islam, young children are also forced by their parents to talk back to God (shalat) when they have entered puberty, even parents are allowed to beat their children if they are still defiant and must be grateful to be born in the world, even suicide is prohibited in Islam

    “Any action without the child’s consent, or which overrides the child’s refusal, or which otherwise involves force, is a violent action. Use of punishment – material or emotional – to elicit from the child the behaviour required by the adult is the very procedure of violent enslavement that Aryanism exists to oppose in all contexts.”

    In Islam it is obligatory to be obedient to parents, even if they do bad things for us, because in the Qur’an it is explained that both parents are the representative of god, and if we hate them, we will be punished in hell

    Why do you support Islam, whose teachings are almost the same as Jewish tribalist religion? Islam is against gnostic world view, even in the Qur’an also explains that Muslims must respect the Prophet Ibrahim, Moses, Ishaq, and Jacob, if they are not respected, then we are the same as betraying God and considered as misguided people

    I read several verses of the Qur’an, and it was explained that the Qur’an was revealed to correct the Torah/Tanakh, which had been forged by the Jews, for their sake

  11. AS says:

    @JP

    “In Islam”

    You are describing Koranism (a.k.a. Judeo-Islam), not Mohammedanism.

    “must be grateful to be born in the world”

    “This world is a prison for the faithful, but a paradise for unbelievers.” – Mohammed

    “Love of the world is the root of all evil.” – Mohammed

    “even suicide is prohibited in Islam”

    “Who seeks martyrdom with sincerity shall get its reward, though he may not achieve it.” – Mohammed

    “it is obligatory to be obedient to parents”

    Ali, only a child of ten years, was the first male to publicly announce his support for his cousin

    He put his hand on the back of Ali’s neck and said “This is my brother, my executor (Wasi), my successor (Caliph) among you, so listen to him and obey him.
    Some Banu Abd al-Muttalib rose up laughing and saying to Ali’s father, Abu Talib,
    He has commanded you to obey your son

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia_view_of_Ali#Muhammad's_era

    “even if they do bad things for us,”

    “God has cursed those parents who (by their behaviour) compel their children to disobey them.” – Mohammed

    “in the Qur’an it is explained that both parents are the representative of god”
    “even in the Qur’an also explains that Muslims must respect the Prophet Ibrahim, Moses, Ishaq, and Jacob,”

    This is evidence that the Koran was corrupted.

    “Why do you support Islam, whose teachings are almost the same as Jewish tribalist religion?”

    Because I would like to restore it to what it was before it was corrupted.

  12. Whatisgoingonwithyou says:

    https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-advice/travellers-stories/new-details-emerge-about-man-heroic-student-was-trying-to-defend/news-story/5d589fb3178eed9972ed24511b2edf35

    Hmmm…

    Maybe emotions caught you this time.

    ———-

    “(And for PI’s record, I have zero interest in having sex with Ersson, nor did I write this blog post with the motive of improving my chances of having sex with her. FFS, even if sex with her were the only way to persuade her to buy firearms(!!!), I would send RP to get it done rather than go myself. And no, I do not want to watch them either. And yes, I am saying all this mainly to illustrate the level of discussion that PI wants to drag us down to.)”

    Why even adress this? Emotions again?

    Keep them in check, you’re solidifying your opposition.

    Maybe thats even what you want.

    You say the gov should do its job, yet endorse activists that prevent them from doing so. You say you want to eradicate the alt-right, yet you are seemingly solidifying them (like PI). You say you want to exterminate all predatory lifeforms(I won’t even comment on that). You say you oppose tribalism, yet suggest for aryans to practically become a tribe. You single out the jew merely for being a jew, just as the jews themselves, to their favour…
    One must know the jew, but one must also never adopt his perspective of seeing the world in non-jew -vs- jew lest you sink to his level…
    Evidently.

    Even when faiths are broken in YOUR image; you do not strive to erect a new faith; you strive to infiltrate and distort things to correct them in your image…
    As with NS.

    Have you become your own enemy?

    Judaism is pure absolutism. Following your own logic you would reject absolutism, yet you have replaced it with your own.

  13. @AS

    “I already knew you would say that, which is why I also linked to the results of Hofer vs van der Bellen (both male candidates), which you have unsurprisingly ignored. If you were correct, there should be no female bias in favour of van der Bellen. But there is. Therefore you are wrong.”
    Not quite, van der Bellen was a feminist, hence the foids were all like “m-m-m! More “Rights”!”. My point remains.

    “But even if you insist on discussing US results only, here is Romney vs Obama (both male candidates again):

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/156848/obama-remains-women-presidential-pick-romney-men.aspx
    Obama was a feminist. Need I speak more?

    “My assessment of present-day voting patterns is in fact very similar to that of right-wingers:

    http://images.comfortingquotes.com/2014/06/wpid-quote-by-ann-coulter-if-we-took1.jpg

    http://images.comfortingquotes.com/2014/06/wpid-saying-from-ann-coulter-it-would-be1.jpg
    Don’t trust that Jew and Whore Ann Coulter. Get it in.

    “Every colonial power was patriarchical. If you were correct, the colonial era would never have happened. The colonial era happened. Therefore you are wrong.”
    To that, I say no. Just because someone commits a mistake, it doesn’t mean it never happened. People aren’t fool-proof. What you’re describing is this scenario:

    Child: “Ooh! A “stove”! I wonder what happens if I touch it!”
    Child: *gets burnt by stove*
    B: “Because the Child got burnt by the stove, the Child never even decided to touch it!”

    Also, there was a reason I brought up anti-tribalist Masculine folk like Bhagat Singh, their Masculinity helped to crush colonialism, combined with Patriarchy doing it’s best to kill colonialism off.

    “(On the other hand, the success of the Suffragette movement coincided with anti-colonialism gaining momentum. Pure coincidence? I doubt it.)”

    “Masculinity is adulteration of Original Nobility (just as femininity is). Masculinity is, among other things, the reason why (male) Incels exist in the first place. Most eventual Incels did not mind celibacy back when they were young children, yet find it increasingly unbearable as they mature, when all they are actually experiencing is a mere CONTINUATION of the same lifestyle that they should have already become used to since childhood. The only thing that has changed is that they have become more masculine, hence it is their own masculinity which is to blame for their own suffering.”
    Not quite. Yes it is true that we were celibate from the start, but we asked ourselves “Why so?”. The answer was painful, we were discriminated on the basis of Height, Ethnicity, and Face. Our Masculinity propelled us to action against such injustice. Masculinity is the True Rebirth of Nobility. It propelled us to fight tribalism. It propelled us to fight all unjust discrimination and evil. By your logic, we are right, and you are wrong. Your logic is like chastising a Palestinian who’s Masculinity accelerates his fight against tribalism merely because he was born into this conflict. Truly Shameless.

    “And don’t get me started on this:

    https://www.plantbasednews.org/post/why-arent-more-men-vegan
    Soyboys grow their beards to seem more “manly” only to have opposite effect. Doesn’t surprise me; people make mistakes. See the colonialism bit.

    “In fact, within the vegan community I have long criticized this type of propaganda:

    https://www.arespectfullife.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Vegan-Men-Have-13-HIGHER-Testosterone-Levels.-1-1024×512.png

    https://veganbetterplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Vegan-men-are-more-manly.jpg

    https://static1.i4u.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/main_image_large/images/2016/01/peta-super-bowl-50-ad.jpg

    The truth is the truth. You may not like it, but that’s it so.

    “veganism IS INDEED unmasculine (which is of course biologically true)”
    Nah bro. What’s so manly about eating meat? Nothing. Masculinity is compassion and care for all. Eating something you killed in a brutal manner is what foids do.

    Incelistan Zindabad, Unity Through Nobility.

    @Whatisgoingonwithyou

    “You say you want to eradicate the alt-right, yet you are seemingly solidifying them (like PI)”
    What the fuck did I do? I’m the one here campaigning for Female Genocide, the solution to many problems we have today, and here you are chastising me for it? Hmph.

  14. AS says:

    @What

    “Maybe emotions caught you this time.”

    I have stated before that criminality is not only no reason for deportation, but indeed is a reason AGAINST deportation. Deported criminals will continue to be criminals, but merely elsewhere. Deporting criminals is equivalent to throwing your trash into your neighbour’s garden, which is worse than leaving it in your own garden. Only tribalists (whose concern is to ensure that as many victims of crime as possible are out-group people rather than in-group people) will disagree with this.

    On an unrelated note, nothing in your linked article confirms that the assault was unjustified. I would have to know more about the case before I can draw any conclusions about whether the conviction even means that the convict is a bad person, or whether it is just another reflection of dishonourable Swedish law.

    “You say the gov should do its job, yet endorse activists that prevent them from doing so.”

    Deportation is not the government’s (or anyone’s) job.

    “You say you want to eradicate the alt-right, yet you are seemingly solidifying them”

    I am not trying to persuade inferior people to abandon their inferior ideology. I merely want the superior people to fully recognize how inferior the inferior people are, and thus become conviced of the necessity of defeating them (because the inferior people are sure as hell not going to give up by themselves!).

    “You say you oppose tribalism, yet suggest for aryans to practically become a tribe.”

    Please link to where on the main site I appear to suggest this and I would be happy to edit it if necessary, because this is as far from my intent as is possible.

    “Judaism is pure absolutism. Following your own logic you would reject absolutism, yet you have replaced it with your own.”

    My logic is that absolutism is preferable to relativism, because any publicized absolute presents itself to be challenged by a competing absolute, whereupon at least a chance exists for the correct absolute to eventually triumph at some point in time. Relativism, insofar as it suppresses one absolute from challenging another (by convincing people that absolutes do not exist in the first place but instead that all opinions are equally valid), is in effect precluding the chance for the correct absolute to triumph, which is why I oppose relativism.

    So no, following my logic I would not reject absolutism, but I certainly wish to replace the Judaic absolute.

    @PI

    “van der Bellen was a feminist”
    “Obama was a feminist.”

    I am not too familiar with van der Bellen’s feminism (would you care to describe it?), but Obama’s feminism was mainly something as obvious as “equal pay for equal work”. So voting for him for the sake of this policy is no evidence of tribalism.

    “anti-tribalist Masculine folk like Bhagat Singh, their Masculinity helped to crush colonialism, combined with Patriarchy doing it’s best to kill colonialism off”

    India hasn’t culturally decolonized yet, precisely because its masculinity is so attracted to Western civilization that it can’t bear to let go of it. India even has a space program FFS…..

    “Yes it is true that we were celibate from the start, but we asked ourselves “Why so?”.”

    Were you already asking this question when you were a young child? (Even Incel champion Elliot Rodger states explicitly that he never cared about this whole issue when he was a young child.)

    “Your logic is like chastising a Palestinian who’s Masculinity accelerates his fight against tribalism merely because he was born into this conflict.”

    This is the propaganda face of Palestine chosen by Palestinians themselves:

    https://orig00.deviantart.net/566a/f/2017/363/d/f/free_ahed_tamimi_by_party9999999-dby7zhz.png

    https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Iil6F_-2GHI/WkWO93Bl21I/AAAAAAAAHBk/dksUrPHa8QU3jULQttfUt5WWNovrK-STQCLcBGAs/s640/ahed%2Btamimi%2B-%2Bquote.jpg

    https://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/headlines/dy2cecfvoaewhar.png-large.jpg

    https://s19453.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ahed2-e1514568159827.png

    Note especially the last picture: Israel is represented by a male IDF troop whereas Palestine is represented by female Tamimi. The same pattern is evident when Tamimi is not used:

    https://img00.deviantart.net/0d53/i/2015/313/e/d/lone_wolf_terror_state_of_israel_vs_palestine_by_emadhajjaj-d9g2g1c.jpg

    http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/img/AI_Cartoons14.jpg

    https://www.palwatch.org/STORAGE/Cartoons/anti%20Balfour%20Cartoon.jpg

    https://www.ynetnews.com/PicServer5/2018/03/22/8423490/842348901000100640360no.jpg

    http://haimbresheeth.com/gaza/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/get-out.jpg

    “What’s so manly about eating meat? Nothing. Masculinity is compassion and care for all. Eating something you killed in a brutal manner is what foids do.”

    You know nothing. In the Paleolithic hunter-gatherer lifestyle, most of the hunting was done by men. (This is why men evolved to have on average better 3D spatial awareness than women: this trait tremendously increases hunting efficiency while having negligble effect on gathering efficiency.) A fraction of women were capable hunters also, but women were never socially ostracized due to lack of hunting skill like men were. Therefore hunting and masculinity were virtually synonymous for most of prehistory, especially in colder regions where a larger proportion of total food energy was supplied by hunting as compared with gathering (hence why patriarchy is stronger in colder regions).

    https://www.psyneuen-journal.com/article/S0306-4530%2803%2900089-1/abstract

    No wonder I hate 3D video games…..

  15. Beetle says:

    @AS

    Why do you think that this asylum seeker deserves to be accepted? Why should he be prioritized over others?

    European nations should accept refugee families, elders and children but why would they accept single adult men? Those single adult men left other families, elders and children on the battlefield and now they get accepted instead of those who deserve help much more. If they will not fight then who will? Those they abandoned certainly won’t since they hardly have a chance.

    I’m confused why do you and some others on this site so strongly support the idea that European nations should accept as many refugees as possible since Jews are the ones who push that idea more than anyone.

    http://archive.is/mP5Qb

    Migration crisis is a creation of Jewry and their goal is to flood Europe with foreign migrants while the Jews pretend they are great humanitarians who aid refugees even though they at the same time ensure that conflict escalates between refugees and Europeans while the Jewish media profits from it.

    It is good that Europe is accepting refugees but it is not good that Europe is doing that mindlessly. Some refugees deserve help more than others and I doubt that Elin Ersson deserve the praise. How do you know she isn’t just another do-gooder?

    By the way, are you familiar with Arno Breker’s statue Readiness(Bereitschaft)? According to Human Beauty article on this site, oval faces look Aryan while square ones do not. Does that statue not look Aryan?

  16. AS says:

    @Beetle

    “Why do you think that this asylum seeker deserves to be accepted?”

    No one chooses where they are born, therefore everyone deserves to choose where to live.

    “Why should he be prioritized over others?”

    I never said this.

    “European nations should accept refugee families, elders and children but why would they accept single adult men?

    Not this shit again…..

    “I’m confused why do you and some others on this site so strongly support the idea that European nations should accept as many refugees as possible since Jews are the ones who push that idea more than anyone.”

    Jews push economically senseless acceptance of refugees DELIBERATELY TO CAUSE FAR-RIGHT BACKLASH. THE BACKLASH, WHICH (UNLESS STOPPED IN TIME) WILL END WITH REFUGEES EXPELLED AND/OR MASSACRED, IS THE TRUE ZIONIST AGENDA. We know this because the backlash herders are ALSO JEWS:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/information/backlash-herders/

    Almost a decade and STILL SO FEW PEOPLE GET IT…..

    We, on the other hand, support economically sensible acceptance of refugees (ie. no welfare; food/shelter/eventual citizenship in exchange for state-supervised labour only) which would actually work fine. If implemented properly, it can even theoretically crush the backlash by organizing the refugees themselves (+ citizen volunteers of course) into an army to physically eliminate the far-right. With the far-right eliminated, the British and French nuclear arsenals will – to Jewish horror – eventually become ours through gradual demographic shift in favour of anti-Zionism.

    “Migration crisis is a creation of Jewry and their goal is to flood Europe with foreign migrants while the Jews pretend they are great humanitarians who aid refugees even though they at the same time ensure that conflict escalates between refugees and Europeans while the Jewish media profits from it.”

    No, the real goal is to – via the easily anticipated backlash – create more and more states (e.g. V4, Austria, (sadly) Italy, etc.) that basically COPY ISRAEL, so that Israel can no longer be singled out for criticism, ALL THE WHILE convincing Red-Pilled useful idiots that their goal is what you described above so that these useful idiots join(!) the backlash in the belief they are thereby outwitting(!!) Jewry when in fact they are following the Zionist script like well-trained sheep.

    “It is good that Europe is accepting refugees but it is not good that Europe is doing that mindlessly.”

    Exactly. Stop welfare for refugees immediately! Start military conscription of refugees today!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkssturm

    So, would you rather these conscripts be, in your words, “families, elders and children”, or “single adult men”?

  17. Beetle says:

    @AS

    Conscripts for what? To fight powerless far-right which is only capable of achieving short-term success and is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things? Europe can’t do anything significant against Jewry, Jewish power lies in America.

    Criticism of Israel is irrelevant since Jews couldn’t care less what others think. Israel has been criticized since the beginning yet it is still here and nothing has changed. Why would Jews have only Israel when they can have the world? They were always internationalists and Israel is the only state they respect.

    It seems that you see far-right parties as a serious threat. None of them are any good. Who would vote for them? Old people and some primitive brutes which you see as tribalists? They will most likely gain more support in the near future since the amount of foreigners in Europe is likely to increase but they will not gain enough support to win elections in any major country. Europe basically sees Trump as an extremist, his trip to UK says enough.

    Also, do you see anything wrong with Europeans mixing with Middle Easterners and Africans?

  18. Whatisgoingonwithyou says:

    @AS (& PI later on)

    I want to inform you that the soul of your response was more important to me than the response itself.

    Don’t slander your enemy if presenting a better alternative can already do that for you.

    For the sake of inquiry let us assume he was justly charged:

    What would you suggest to do with such cases?
    Jail?
    “It has now emerged that the 52-year-old man had served jail time for assault.”

    Guest status until taken back?
    “Separately to his prison sentence, had had also had his asylum appeal rejected.”

    “Deporting criminals is equivalent to throwing your trash into your neighbour’s garden, which is worse than leaving it in your own garden. Only tribalists (whose concern is to ensure that as many victims of crime as possible are out-group people rather than in-group people) will disagree with this.”

    So they will gladly take your trash for you?

    Execution of criminals?
    From tribalism vs universalism:
    “It is, however, possible for each to feign the outward behaviour of the other depending on social trends.”
    You’d be executing a lot of victims.(*)

    On a side note, what about enlisting all refugees in the military?

    Anyway, not all too relevant because she wanted to stop an entirely different guy she seemed fond of from being deported.
    But maybe you support her merely because she has a common enemy.
    To me it seemed more like a publicity stunt.
    She only filmed herself crying over it and never the man in question; like an appeal to emotion. She herself was the center of the action rather than the victim. Not something I would want a noble person or act to resemble.
    Especially not as an Ideal on a blog.
    And who got to benefit from this stunt; Elin or the man that will be/was still deported eitherway?

    Meanwhile people take in refugees in their homes without saying a word, because they tout not self-righteousness, but incarnate idealism.

    What she did was courageous and great… in principle.

    I don’t know why you seem so keen on fortifying the alt-right and neocons that zionists pray on happening for two main reasons;
    It will demonize muslims in order to justify war in the middle-east for israels expansion and dismiss it as a fight against “a terrorist people”.
    Also will it set western civilisation in stone because people will become increasingly sympathetic with israels methods (or even israel itself!).
    The consequences I’m sure you can flesh out yourself, may not be the antidote you hoped for… One need make damn sure this doesn’t happen any faster!
    The enemies enemies are just another outgroup with temporarily aligned self-interests and thus unlikely to be true allies. However, because this issue runs at the core, I think it wouldn’t be a complete ilk to unite under a special, separate project to aleviate the pressure on “survival” and intentional confusion by the zionists and purely focus on uniting against the above main issues of the current agenda.

    Don’t fight all your enemies at once, we’ve seen…

    Perhaps what truly bothers me is that your refugee stance seems rather oriented on provocation towards the right, than advocation of solutions/plans of the problem.

    Maybe this is slightly represented with your banner whos vibes scream,
    “open the borders and bring the families!” and a swastika, as if it was there just to piss off morons.
    I know this cannot be you, bringing families into the current welfare system would mean rampamt overpopulation within an astonishingly small timeframe.
    (Not implying that families should be denied asylum! Rather that the focus should be shifted away from the appeal to family.)

    ——–

    “Please link to where on the main site I appear to suggest this and I would be happy to edit it if necessary, because this is as far from my intent as is possible.”

    Right above it you wrote:

    “I am not trying to persuade inferior people to abandon their inferior ideology. I merely want the superior people to fully recognize how inferior the inferior people are, and thus become conviced of the necessity of defeating them (because the inferior people are sure as hell not going to give up by themselves!).”

    You also gave me a pretty abstracted paragraph on your reply to Judaism & absolutism when you could’ve merely stated that absolutism and Judaism are not mutually inclusive, thus it is judaism you reject and not absolutism.
    I’d also add a different take to that differentiation:
    Both absolutism and relativism imply conflict, however the formers success would aleviate, whereas the latters success would perpetuate confliction.
    Though I see tribalism as an implicit value of your site demanding the virulent slander of non-aryans as inferior, the state controlled reproduction of aryan traits (i.e. no intermarriage), and even the apartheid between aryans and non aryans.

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-2018/

    comments:

    “If Jews are being persecuted for being Jewish, they deserve to be persecuted, since it was they themselves who started calling themselves Jews.”

    “If non-Jews are being persecuted for being non-Jewish, they do not deserve to be persecuted, since it was Jews who started calling them non-Jews.”

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-starbucks-edition/comment-page-1/#comments

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-starbucks-edition/comment-page-2/#comments

    Discussing your quarantine zones.

    (*)and then follows:

    “as the decreasing fashionability of universalism must mean that only the most ideologically dedicated universalists will heed our message and join our movement”

    A lot of alt-righters were once dedicated leftists and never found what you call the true left, but suddenly these aren’t victims, they’re just too non-aryan?

    You are not for all tribes, you are against all tribes but your own kind.
    You even ignored the two most important parts of my post.

    “as the state will control the reproduction of non-humans as well as humans, and hence be able to terminate the bloodlines of predatory animals just as we would terminate the bloodlines of cruel humans.”
    http://aryanism.net/culture/veganism/

    Let’s rephrase that.

    “Only my kind is worthy of life.”


    Aryan

    1) As adjective: Heritably noble
    Genetic contexts only


    Tribalism (non-Aryan attitude)

    In-group altruism and out-group indifference; ethics based on this principle

    (The quarantine zones aren’t based on in-group out-group ethics?)


    Universalism (Aryan attitude)

    Compassion towards all; ethics based on this principle



    Non-Aryan

    Anyone who acquiesces any form of slavery (esp. anyone who prefers slavery – including being a slavemaster or an observer to slavery – over death).

    Not ethnicity-specific (but believed to have a genetic basis)
    Collective term for Jews and Gentiles
    Contrast with Aryan


    Aryanist

    Supporter of Aryanism (esp. an activist in our network); one who associates with others according to nobility rather than conventional categories

    Not to be confused with Aryan (though hopefully the two terms eventually converge)


    Jew

    Beneficiary of Judaism; tribalist who is dishonest about his tribalism

    Contrast with Gentile, Aryan


    Judaism

    Membership selection system (hence the term “Chosen People”) and culture with the objective of benefit to Jews, and ultimately Zionism; Jewish racism

    Increasingly imitated by Gentiles (to benefit their own tribes); see “Boromir Syndrome


    Boromir Syndrome (BS) (non-Aryan culture)

    Adopting the enemy’s values in order to compete against the enemy ie. conceding to play the enemy’s game

    Term inspired by LOTR character
    E.g. Gentiles’ so-called “defensive racism”

    Just because jewish racial idealism has already succeeded in becoming a tribe does not exempt aryans from the same through your ideology merely because they have not succeeded yet.

    “is the Aryan not, by the same argument, a slave to his own nobility, in that he is compelled by it to overcome slavery? No, because if he is successful, the compulsion ends.”

    I guess you can’t be tribal when you’re the only ones standing though.
    For the same reason I advocated absolutism because it aleviates the conflict between things in relativity.

    “The simplest way to understand racial idealism is to think of a race as a genetic folk. If a folk is a people that work towards a common purpose, then a race is a people with a biological – and therefore heritable – tendency to work towards a common purpose. Indeed any folk that reproduces with sufficiently strong selective pressure concordant with its purpose will, given enough time (which can be drastically shortened by appropriate state initiatives), become such a race. And the larger the starting gene pool, the higher the resulting racial quality is likely to be, simply because we have more possible genetic combinations from which to make our quality selection in the first place.

    “Races provide the original fundamentals of our essence and our expressions; it determines the physical and psychical collective expression of our people; but our Folk is a new biological unity whose members are joined together in the portentous bands of a community of blood in a common homeland. Within a Folk the profound biological laws of human evolution, heredity and selection, adaption and genetic drift, realize themselves. Race is therefore a result, Folk is a commencement in the biological evolution of human groups.” – Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt

    You might be anti-racist, but you’re still vehemently anti-outgroup.
    You’ve merely shifted the definitions of the groups.
    Perhaps this is what gives most people confusion here.

    Hereby I must conclude you are not rationally compassionate, but compassionately rational.
    I see the selective uncontainability of emotion in your various texts.

    Also, have you heard of HSP (high-sensetivity person)?

    This is my N.1 trait to look for before anything else.
    I would label it superior to all “aryan traits” you have named, as this is the biological basis for a brain with increased bloodflow in the areas of sensory awareness, emotion and empathy.
    ______________________

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/03/otto-weininger-on-the-jewish-question/

    These weirdos have actually put out something interesting, these are Otto Weinigers (jew) views practically expressed by PI.

    The only thing I could even imagine arguing in your favour, would be to say that the perpetrators of masculine acts of violence might be more easily held accountable for, as they tend to be more forthright, preluding themselves in honor of face to face battle, rather than cunning and obscurance of language that tend to be the method of choice by the feminine.

    For the Jews, the indirect feminine aproach was the most compatible with their archetype to manifest self-interests. For the majority of non-jews, the more direct masculine approach was the means by which they could most easily manifested self-interests.

    It’s the survivalists path of least resistence.

    An example of this and feminine iniquity not being unique only to Jews is because most non-jews channel the same iniquity when put in the corresponding position that propagates the given method of survivalism; Observe men of the false left, and women of the alt-right.

    In reality, the man who strangles his wife is no better than the woman who poisons her husband.

    What you (PI) do not recognise is that this site rightfully opposes both the feminine and the masculine and it is the solutions you (PI) expressed that are in fact just an empirically fueled rage out of sexual frustration that need saving.

    Only the noble person who seeks not to survive but establish ideals even at the cost of their own life, can transcend the gender dichotomy by never having been a part of it.
    It is hereby I believe heroism and honour have been falsely attributed to the masculine spirit and not the warrior spirit (which is void of a body).

    lastly @AS

    What is your end goal for planet earth and life?

    & by the way, why are quotes never sourced?

  19. Whatisgoingonwithyou says:

    @AS

    I didn’t see you had already touched some things in your reply to beetle due to my lack of internet.
    Good to see.

    @Beetle

    Do you think you are being flooded and demographically replaced?
    So why ask for families?

    You say europe can’t fight jewry?
    You’ve just been give a few million potential anti-zionist soldiers…
    So let’s train them!

    Make up your mind.

  20. Beetle says:

    @Whatisgoingonwithyou

    https://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

    “History and the study of the science of population show that there are three biological stages which inevitably lead to the destruction of the vitality of a people and with it the destruction of the foundations of the State and culture as such. These three stages are:
    -A decreasing population,
    -An increase of the hereditary unfit,
    -The promiscuous mingling of races.
    In these respects, Germany’s position in 1933 was alarming. ” -Walter Gross

    Europe’s position in 2018 is even more alarming.

    Fighting Jewry means fighting America along with Russia since both have succumbed to Jewry. What do you plan to do with those soldiers? What makes you think they even want to fight? They are fleeing from war and expecting them to fight for a foreign country is a bit ridiculous.

  21. John Johnson says:

    Here you go AS, it looks like the sentiment behind #FightICEwithFire is catching on:

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/19/occupy-wall-street-advocates-killing-ice-agents/

    I missed this in the news, but Occupy ICE began in June:

    http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/393790-occupy-ice-protests-emerge-across-the-country
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_ICE

    Our enemies are taking Occupy ICE so seriously that VDARE has redirected their front page to a pro-ICE message, along with begging for more donations.

    “”Abolish ICE” means Abolishing America”

    Abolishing ICE is the only way to manifest America, just as abolishing slavery and abolishing Jim Crow was necessary for this goal as well. America can not shine until WNs and Western Civilization are abolished for good.

    From The Hill article:

    “Though the protests are not led by any one group, the Democratic Socialists of America are involved in most states,

    Young up-and-coming Democrat Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez is a member of this organization. Although she is not True Left (yet), she injected some refreshing anti-Zionism into the Democrats (but she quickly backpeddled on her comments once she caught heat from the media–I think she just needs more encouragement from the True Left).

    http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/27/jewish-group-declines-ocasio-cortez/

    https://www.npr.org/2018/06/27/623752094/who-is-alexandria-ocasio-cortez

  22. Beetle says:

    This site says that National Socialists didn’t have anything against race-mixing which is completely wrong.

    “Because the findings in the field of racial science have determined that the German people are composed, next to the decisive element of the Nordic Race, also of a lower amount of more or less related racial elements, which are also building blocks of the European neighboring peoples, the term that has been chosen to express the entirety of all the racial elements that make up the German people is “Aryan” (which is different from the same term used in linguist studies!), which summarizes the German blood and all blood that is closely related to it under one common racial term. Exactly the same breath of definition has the term “German or German-related blood” in the Reichsbürgergesetz (law of Reich citizenship).

    Of Aryan ancestry (=“German-blooded”) is everyone who is free from any element of alien – from the perspective of the German people – blood. Alien is defined here primarily as the blood of the Jews and Gypsies who live in European lands, blood of the Asiatic and African races and of the natives of Australia and America (Indians), while for example an Englishman or a Swede, a Frenchman or a Czech, a Pole or an Italian, as long as he himself is free from such elements of alien blood, is to be considered as related, and therefore as Aryan.“ so such a person must count as Aryan, no matter if he lives in his homeland, in East Asia, or in America, may he be a citizen of the USA or of a South American state.” (Ahnenpaß)

    “A Reich citizen is a subject of the state who is of German or related blood, and proves by his conduct that he is willing and fit to faithfully serve the German people and Reich.” (Reich Citizenship Law)

    “Today we are once more following these old laws, using humane methods, for they follow a more hard and brutal course in nature according to God’s will. We are doing nothing more than reestablishing the laws of creation, and bowing to the heavenly order. We are thus showing piety and true humility — you are the heretics.

    This applies as well to the third and last principle of our racial thinking. This third and last principle is that the people on this world, in America, Africa or China, are different both in body and soul. They are not equal, as yesterday’s lie had it.

    People are different.

    They not only speak different languages and look different: no, they are different in the depths of their hearts and natures, and in their abilities for good and evil. In the past people believed that these differences were accidental, the result of climate or civilization, and that one could overcome these differences and create a unified man in a unified state in which all would be equally happy. We have learned that such ideas are false. We have learned that the differences between the major blood groups of the world, between the major races, are not the result of human action, but of the laws of Creation. We have learned that the lines between blood and blood, race and race, are also the lines between soul and soul and spirit and spirit. We have learned that the opposite of the old phrase “What God has brought together, let no man put asunder” is also true. We have learned:

    What God has separated, man should not bring together.

    Heaven thought it good not to have only one type of people on the earth, but different kinds, various racially-bound peoples. That is a part of Creation. We bow before this truth and respect the borders. That means that the foundation of our separation of the races is not a matter of politics or economics, but rather it rests on a higher level, to which we in the end are responsible.” -Walter Gross(Nationalsozialistische Rassenpolitik. Eine Rede an die deutschen Frauen)

    “However, the differences between races are not limited to the physical and external. They extend to the character, to intellectual and spiritual traits.

    That is clear to us if we compare a person from here in our German homeland with a Negro, or if we compare an Eskimo with a Mongol; their intellectual and spiritual differences are immediately obvious.

    Racial science teaches us that all the essential differences between peoples and races in this world are inherited. They cannot be changed by educational or training systems. Humanity cannot change them.

    The races are different because their blood is different, as the proverb says, not because civilization is further advanced in one place than it is in another. We have to accept that, just as we have to accept any natural law on this earth.” -Walter Gross(Rasse. Eine Rundfunkrede von Dr. Groß)

    People who weren’t of German or related blood weren’t eligible for Reich Citizenship except in special cases which were approved by The Fuhrer or Ministry of Interior.

    https://i.imgur.com/g5H4BAO.png

    German folk is a mixture of various races as the image shows. Those races were considered related while other races which aren’t shown in the image were considered foreign to the German folk.

    NSDAP recognized differences among the various races of the world and understood that mixing with foreign races would be ridiculous since that is a negation of Nature and in that case it would make no sense to bother opposing mixing between Germans and Jews.

    As Gross said, what God has separated man should not bring together. Some races are related while others are not, without acknowledging that it is impossible to establish mutual friendship with folks of different racial makeups.

  23. AS says:

    @Beetle

    “Conscripts for what? To fight powerless far-right which is only capable of achieving short-term success and is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things?”

    To fight these guys for a start:

    https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1401212729742.jpg

    And eventually this guy:

    https://s3.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20180801&t=2&i=1289075156&r=LYNXMPEE702RN&w=1280

    which means first getting through these guys:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Defence_Forces

    “Europe can’t do anything significant against Jewry”

    We need bases from which to launch our military invasion of Israel.

    “Jewish power lies in America.”

    We plan to take back America also. Please refer to JJ’s comment:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/support-elin-ersson/comment-page-1/#comment-179356

    “Criticism of Israel is irrelevant since Jews couldn’t care less what others think.”

    They will care when we start bombing. To get to the stage where military invasion is realistic, criticism of Israel needs to become a worldwide consensus.

    “It seems that you see far-right parties as a serious threat.”

    I see them as a threat to the same degree that Bannon sees them as an opportunity:

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-bannons-plan-to-hijack-europe-for-the-far-right

    Either both Bannon and I are (hopefully) mistaken or both of us are correct. If the latter, and yet our side did not prepare, then it would be our fault.

    “None of them are any good. Who would vote for them? Old people and some primitive brutes which you see as tribalists? They will most likely gain more support in the near future since the amount of foreigners in Europe is likely to increase but they will not gain enough support to win elections in any major country.”

    They have already won in V4, Austria and Italy. Next month we will see what happens in Sweden…..

    “Europe basically sees Trump as an extremist, his trip to UK says enough.”

    You do not live in reality.

    @What

    “What would you suggest to do with such cases?
    Jail?
    “It has now emerged that the 52-year-old man had served jail time for assault.”
    Guest status until taken back?
    “Separately to his prison sentence, had had also had his asylum appeal rejected.””

    In accurate English, jail is where accused are kept prior to trial, and prison is where convicts are kept after conviction. Whatever you are quoting does not appear to distinguish the two.

    But if he has already served his sentence which is assumed to be fair, the incident is over, and he should be treated like anyone else.

    “Not something I would want a noble person or act to resemble.
    Especially not as an Ideal on a blog.”

    No one is forcing you to read this blog. If this post praising Ersson could get you to leave, then the post would have been worth it.

    Right above it you wrote:
    ““I am not trying to persuade inferior people to abandon their inferior ideology. I merely want the superior people to fully recognize how inferior the inferior people are, and thus become conviced of the necessity of defeating them (because the inferior people are sure as hell not going to give up by themselves!).””

    Quality control is not tribalism.

    “Though I see tribalism as an implicit value of your site”

    That is because you are illiterate.

    “demanding the virulent slander of non-aryans as inferior,”

    Tribalism is in-group/out-group double standards. Quality control is one standard for all and no favours to those – regardless of origin – who fail to meet that one standard. Next you will tell me that Jesus was a “tribalist” because he promised the Last Judgement.

    ““If Jews are being persecuted for being Jewish, they deserve to be persecuted, since it was they themselves who started calling themselves Jews.”
    “If non-Jews are being persecuted for being non-Jewish, they do not deserve to be persecuted, since it was Jews who started calling them non-Jews.””

    I stand by these quotes, which teach pure anti-tribalism.

    “A lot of alt-righters were once dedicated leftists”

    What does that say about their “dedication”?

    “You are not for all tribes, you are against all tribes but your own kind.”

    My kind is not a tribe, it is all who hate the very idea of tribes.

    ““Only my kind is worthy of life.””

    Those who least wish to reproduce must, for practical purposes, unfortunately be the last to stop reproducing.

    SOMEONE has to carry the Ring long enough (and even use it on occasions!) to transport it to where it can be destroyed.

    “Just because jewish racial idealism has already succeeded in becoming a tribe does not exempt aryans from the same through your ideology merely because they have not succeeded yet.”

    Frodo =/= Boromir

    “You might be anti-racist, but you’re still vehemently anti-outgroup.
    You’ve merely shifted the definitions of the groups.”

    No, I am vehemently anti-[all who think in terms of ingroup/outgroup]. Your complaint is equivalent to the pacificist complaint that retaliatory violence is no different than initiated violence.

    (Those who understand honour will indeed see tribalism as merely a form of initiated violence, which demands retaliation under the principle of Ahimsa.)

    “What is your end goal for planet earth and life?”

    No more reproduction (which is yet another form of violence).

    @JJ

    “Here you go AS, it looks like the sentiment behind #FightICEwithFire is catching on:”

    Good, now let’s see how long it takes before we see an actual body count. Let this be clear: until Rehabs are being taken out FASTER THAN THEY CAN BE REPLENISHED, deportations will continue.

    “Our enemies are taking Occupy ICE so seriously that VDARE has redirected their front page to a pro-ICE message, along with begging for more donations.”

    The finances are on our side in this: it costs much less to kill a Rehab than to employ a new one.

    “Abolishing ICE is the only way to manifest America, just as abolishing slavery and abolishing Jim Crow was necessary for this goal as well. America can not shine until WNs and Western Civilization are abolished for good.”

    This kind of material is for your blog. You should aim to make your blog the first resource that all Occupy ICE/Abolish ICE supporters (and eventually all American leftists) turn to for guidance.

    “Young up-and-coming Democrat Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez is a member of this organization. Although she is not True Left (yet), she injected some refreshing anti-Zionism into the Democrats (but she quickly backpeddled on her comments once she caught heat from the media–I think she just needs more encouragement from the True Left).”

    I started hearing about her recently. Her anti-Zionism is feeble at best, as she supports the “two-state solution”. To get her from here to proposing the US cease to recognize Israel will take some work. But it is certainly worth a try. At present, even Ilhan Omar is stronger on the issue than her:

    https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/muslim-candidate-for-congress-calls-israel-apartheid-regime-1.6263263

    Omar also supports Abolish ICE:

    https://www.ilhanomar.com/

  24. What says:

    @AS

    I’m not your enemy yet.
    https://youtu.be/dMeZCPbM6bA

    You chose here not to absorb and inform, but instead insult me. So if you have any troubles in your soul, I’m offering at the recieving end, an open ear.

    Anyways…

    ___

    “Quality control is not tribalism.”
    “My kind is not a tribe, it is all who hate the very idea of tribes.”


    Judaism

    Membership selection system (hence the term “Chosen People”)

    “it is all who…”

    I’m puzzled.

    “Tribalism is in-group/out-group double standards. Quality control is one standard for all and no favours to those – regardless of origin –”

    Agreed…

    “If non-Jews are being persecuted for being non-Jewish, they do not deserve to be persecuted, since it was Jews who started calling them non-Jews.””


    Non-Aryan

    Anyone who acquiesces any form of slavery (esp. anyone who prefers slavery – including being a slavemaster or an observer to slavery – over death).

    Not ethnicity-specific (but believed to have a genetic basis)
    Collective term for Jews and Gentiles
    Contrast with Aryan

    “Good, now let’s see how long it takes before we see an actual body count. ”

    As far as I’m aware it is not the gentiles that have started to call themselves non-aryans, but you, who is trying to persecute all of them.

    “Frodo =/= Boromir”

    Right now,
    You ? Frodo
    You’re being a wholly different sauron all together with an entirely new ring.

    “No, I am vehemently anti-[all who think in terms of ingroup/outgroup]. Your complaint is equivalent to the pacificist complaint that retaliatory violence is no different than initiated violence.”

    Not at all. My complaint is that you have actually begun to initiate violence. Besides, then why is it  you are defining in- and outgroups in the first place?

    ____

    “No more reproduction (which is yet another form of violence).”

    You want to exterminate life itself?
    Because noone chose to be born?

    -“Your complaint is equivalent to the pacificist complaint that retaliatory violence is no different than initiated violence.”

    I’m not content to exist in this world, indeed that is true. Some are born a retaliatory existence, are they not? Or what are you if not at least in part that?
    Those who use retaliatory violence do so not because they enjoy it (exceptions granted) but because it is their duty. As it is our fate to be born into, and live that duty.
    I am however, content to have that duty.

    Parents usually don’t consciously try to choose the outcome of their reproduction, is having a child therefore masochism?
    You are the one consciously determining what should come to exist despite never having asked it to, through state controll on reproduction, even though you too can only speculate on its outcome. It is thus (here too) not rationally possible for you to be able to avoid initiatory violence this way.

    On the other hand, if you imagine experience as a cross-section of a dimensionally all-present cycle (acknowledging the rational impossibility of a “beginning” and “end” of the universe: At the end of finite possibility can only lie the infinite impossibility, which in turn has to create finite possibility in order to exist. (even all empirical theories of this hint to a cyclical phenomenon))
    [and to fully end reproduction you would have to destroy every cycle of known and unknown dimensions in order for existence to end] reproduction would be the realisation of time beyond our conscious.
    …You are men against time, no doubt.

    I don’t believe the ideas of “rebirth” or the saying “the child chooses its parents” are wholly wrong.

    Men in time, Men against time… both carry a negative synchronicity.
    I refuse this divide, and choose – life through time – to replenish a positive synchronicity for our cycles that themselves are trapped in time.

    _____

    “What does that say about their “dedication”?”

    Nothing. It is entirely possible for someone to have been dedicated in the past whilst having lost this dedication in the present.

    _____

    “In accurate English, jail is where accused are kept prior to trial, and prison is where convicts are kept after conviction. Whatever you are quoting does not appear to distinguish the two.

    But if he has already served his sentence which is assumed to be fair, the incident is over, and he should be treated like anyone else.”

    If you want to avoid my question about what you would do and divert to semantics I have to correct you…

    The most notable difference between jail and prison is the length of stay for inmates. Short prison sentences can also be served in jail.
    This man had already been convicted.

    “Swedish police have since confirmed that the man had been convicted and served time for assault, but said his denied asylum application was unrelated to his crimes.”
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6013237/Migrant-deportation-stopped-student-protest-jail-assault.html

    I asked you what your solution would be and simply provided what had already happened so that you have a context.

    _____

    “No one is forcing you to read this blog. ”

    Neither is anyone forcing you to read or reply to my comments.
    I do this not to assert myself, but because I feel obliged to test my own, and others truths.
    I hope this is valid of you too because so far it doesn’t seem to be.

  25. Beetle says:

    @AS

    If you wish to purge Jewry from Europe then you will have to purge Jewry from America first.

    “We need bases from which to launch our military invasion of Israel.”

    What about the Samson Option?

    If Kurz is far-right then what are Le Pen and Wilders? They’re on a different level.

    “You do not live in reality.”

    Seems like no one on this site does. You reject the National Socialist Racial Theory and refuse to accept the fundamental natural law.

    “Beside the Nordic type we find the East-European type, beside the
    Eastern there is the Dinaric, the Western type intermingling with both, and
    hybrids among them all. That is a grave drawback to us.

    Through it the Germans lack that strong herd instinct which arises from
    unity of blood and saves nations from ruin in dangerous and critical times,
    because on such occasions small differences disappear, and a united herd faces
    the enemy.” -Adolf Hitler(1925)

    “Race is a blood component, it’s the blood-based nucleus, but the people very often consist, not of one race, but of two, three, four or five different racial nuclei.

    When one regards the German people from this point of view, as purely biological, then we see a union of peoples with the same language, consolidated through the circuitous route of State-formation – that is perhaps the decisive thing here – but of various racial origins; a Nordic racial nucleus, but Alpine elements are present as well, Mediterranean racial nuclei, with a still-European base race in it all, a prehistoric race which we are no longer able to identify specifically, but which is there, it was already there among the Greeks; the Helots of the Spartans consisted of them. This racial nucleus lies concealed in our people as well.

    So we see a people that consists of various racial nuclei. These racial nuclei, in the individual, possess their special abilities; since the abilities lie, not primarily in the people, rather, they lie primarily in the race. That the German people now possesses many racial nuclei is shown, in the end, by the richness of its abilities, since all these racial nuclei carry certain inclinations in themselves: the Nordic racial nucleus a very coolly-inclined, mathematically proficient factor, the factor which until now generally organised countries on the earth, basically organizational. In addition, other racial nuclei with a strongly artistic gift, with a gift for the purely visual, the pictorial; then again, racial nuclei with a strongly musical gift, as well as racial nuclei with a strong commercial gift. The strongest of these racial nuclei which possessed such a commercial gift without creative activity in the German people long term, would be Jewry. Only with the difference that this Jewry did not arise as a racial nucleus among the German people, but rather that it would have gradually but completely disintegrated the German people.

    We have now united this racial nucleus in our people. But it is now decisive for me, since the abilities of the German people are so great, to bring forth the leading racial nucleus among the various abilities. That means I must see that in the case of artistic abilities, the racial nucleus that is most artistically gifted in the German people gradually come to take a leading role everywhere.

    This is decisive, because for the leadership of a people, only the Nordic racial component has any real value. In the overall selection, this will always result in a uniform picture. But one must not assume a uniform picture in nature, since nature shows us here, that in the crossing of two different parents, the talents or abilities of the son must not always come from the father, or, in the case of the daughter, from the mother; rather, on the contrary, cross-connections must appear here, so that, if a Nordic man marries an Alpine woman, the child of the same sex need not be Nordic; rather, it can be completely Alpine, so that it is also very easily possible in any racial crossing for the organisational talent to be completely pushed into the background in favor of any other.” -Adolf Hitler(1944)

    That is what you will NEVER achieve if you do not acknowledge racial differences. As Hitler said, it is decisive. Uniting your folk while completely disregarding the racial composition is impossible and in that case it is also impossible to establish mutual friendships with different folks of different racial compositions.

    “Race is a group of people with the same physical and mental hereditary traits. Race is invariable, enduring (constant). Every human being, like every other living creature, inherits its own traits of body, mind, and character. The folk varies precisely in accord with its racial composition. The character of a folk results from its racial composition.

    The German folk consists of several races: Nordic, Eastern (Alpine), Dinaric, East Baltic, Phalian, and Western (Mediterranean).

    The races of which the German folk consists are all related to each other; consequently they have more that is common than distinct. The German folk represents a unity; the particular races that comprise it produce the polymorphism and richness of the German essence, nonetheless without inhibiting the unity of our nation. A danger of the first rank to the German folk could therefore result only through mixture with alien races.

    Germany is the mighty wedge which the Nordic race forms on the European mainland. It must maintain itself in the face of all neighboring peoples, which are racially entirely differently constituted. All Europe is menaced by alien races. In France the Negro gains ever more acceptance. Every mixture with racial aliens (e.g. Jews, Negroes, Mongols, leads necessarily to the decline of the nation. In racial chaos all great states and cultures have perished (e.g. Greece, Rome, etc.).”(Politische Fibel,1940)

    Same thing is repeated in countless other official documents(which were also approved by the Office of the Racial Policy of NSDAP)

    “The racial principles of National Socialism are, therefore, the surest guarantee for respecting the integrity of other nations.

    The Europeans and the inhabitants of India, the Pacific Islands, etc., have instinctively held aloof from a mingling of the blood, and both sides genuinely regard any transgression as very bad form. Nevertheless, this natural attitude in no way detracts from the possibility of close co-operation and friendly intercourse. And, speaking on behalf of the new Germany, let me once more emphasise:

    We do not wish our people to intermarry with those of alien race since through such mingling of the blood the best and characteristic qualities of both races are lost. But we will always have a ready welcome for any guests who wish to visit us whether of kindred or foreign civilization, and our racial views only lead us to a fuller appreciation of their essential peculiarities in the same way as we would want our own peculiarities respected.” -Walter Gross

    NSDAP clearly defined who is of German or related blood(people of European descent) and who is of foreign blood(people of African and Asiatic descent). They have repeated that same thing in countless official documents. It was possible for someone of foreign blood to become a member of the German folk but only if that case was approved by the Fuhrer or Ministry of Interior(just like some Mischlinge were considered German and had full rights).

    This is probably my last post and the only reason I am posting it is because it is a shame that you have come so close yet so far. This site has completely ignored that fundamental aspect of National Socialism. If you continue ignoring it then you will remain racially blind. If that is what you wish then so be it, remain in the abyss. You can continue attempting to negate Nature but it will get you nowhere, no human is above Nature. You have set back your own movement and handicapped your own self. Acknowledging the natural law recognized by National Socialists would greatly aid your movement. Nordic race was very important to NSDAP not because of “Nordicism”(Nordic supremacy has little to do with NSDAP and you know it) but because it is the dominant race in the German folk and it is impossible to care for Germans without caring for the Nordic race. Caring about Aryans without caring about the Nordic race and other races is impossible since that makes caring for your own folk impossible. Aryan Nordic National Socialist Sweden will never be the same as Aryan Mediterranean National Socialist Portugal because Portuguese folk has a different racial composition from the Swedish folk(both are related). They can both be Aryan but one is Nordic while another is Mediterranean. Whether you accept that or not is irrelevant because that is what Nature determines, not you. National Socialists recognized and accepted that because doing that is a necessity, not an option.

  26. @Beetle
    You are confusing “race” with “ethnicity”. Multiethnic relationships were permitted and commonplace in the Reich. Race mixing was not.

  27. Beetle says:

    @Christian Bethel

    This site is confusing “race” with “ethnicity”. Race mixing was allowed between related races, Germans are a mixture of related races. People who belonged to foreign races weren’t eligible for Reich Citizenship according to official law. All people of European blood were considered racially related to Germans and were eligible for Reich Citizenship while people of African and Asian blood were considered racially alien and ineligible for Reich Citizenship except in special circumstances.

    NSDAP officially defined the meaning of the term “race”:

    “Before we speak of the significance of worldview, we must quickly review a few facts about scientific racial research and racial science. First, we must consider what is meant by the word “race.” As everyone has noticed in the last eighteen months, people often mean different things when using the word and therefore talk past each other.

    The word “race” still has two primary meanings today. In one sense, it means all the inherited physical and intellectual characteristics and abilities that a person has, in contrast to the abilities that he gains during his life. In this sense, “race” means something like inheritance or genetics. However, the word in its deepest and most important sense applies to whole groups of people who are separated from other groups of people by their common genetic inheritance.

    We were forced to reach these conclusions once we understood the word “race,” which essentially means inherited characteristics. Yet as I already said, this use of the word includes only part of its meaning. Beyond that, the word “race” in its true sense means something like the Nordic race or the Mongolian race or some other racial group of people. You know that people in this world are not equal. They differ outwardly; one is black, another red, the third yellow or white, and within these large groups science has determined that there are many other particular races.

    However, the differences between races are not limited to the physical and external. They extend to the character, to intellectual and spiritual traits.

    That is clear to us if we compare a person from here in our German homeland with a Negro, or if we compare an Eskimo with a Mongol; their intellectual and spiritual differences are immediately obvious.” -Walter Gross(Eine Rundfunkrede von Dr. Groß, Rassenpolitisches Amt der NSDAP)

    Here is the image of the races which form the German people https://i.imgur.com/g5H4BAO.png

    Germans are a mixture of six races which are related to each other, other races which do not appear on that image were considered racially alien. Various races exist all over the world and all European folks are a mixture of races. The key point is that some races are related while others are not.

  28. @Beetle

    I agree that ethnicities consist of several races (not vice versa) and that the harmony of these create the folkish character.
    I wouldn’t necessarily say this site disagrees with that either though.
    To me it seems to disagree with todays notion of the races that encompass ethnicities (i.e. caucasoid, africoid, australoid, mongloid and american) as being a useful classification because there are as many and severe ingroup as there are outgroup differences of these.

    Could the content of your posts in short be summed up as;

    The (malleable) nature of existence is the only true absolute. Any absolute forged by an individual is therefore both the spiritual and physical expression of his own nature relative to that of those around him. (?)

    I say malleable in parenthesis because it is not implied in what you wrote/quoted but still a truth about genetic heredity; (Even if you would pure breed and enhance traits to extremes) It is hard to argue for genetic “mutation” to be random (why would a niche even be sustainable then without constant occurrence of unwanted mutations? And what an energetic waste this would be for the parent and environment); 99% of our genetic code is believed to be useless in us. To think that the delicacy of nature would dump a load of trash into such an efficient system would be ridiculous. Life is highly adaptable and to say that all this “code” is anything else than stored packets of possible adaptations to external and internal stimulion that have been saved is insane to me (especially considering that all life on earth comes from practically the same ancient information carrying system). If the adaptation is present in both parents, the trait will slowly be fortified through generations as long as the trend continues (imo mistaken for only being “selective pressure” which I believe is the social synchronisation to this principle), unless it ceaces to be fortified through the double up of the next parents OR the next parents have not been exposed to said stimulation enough.

    That being said, it is an even more pressing reason to remove the jewish spirit from our cultures and worldviews.
    Though I have to agree with this site in the notion that current classifications of races are not to be taken as stricly anymore as the current genetic impurities and environmental impurities, resulting in many people whos body and spirit may not match eachother in the sense of the old classifications, and is thus better to determine all or most cases individually.

    “We do not wish our people to intermarry with those of alien race since through such mingling of the blood the best and characteristic qualities of both races are lost. But we will always have a ready welcome for any guests who wish to visit us whether of kindred or foreign civilization, and our racial views only lead us to a fuller appreciation of their essential peculiarities in the same way as we would want our own peculiarities respected.” -Walter Gross

    Yes, true multiculturalism = exchange between the neighbours’ authentic lives (not assimilation of them).

    “Europe’s position in 2018 is even more alarming.”

    You see there is an impending conflict… At last even these people won’t have much elsewhere to flee once it does, and when it does, they’ll have to choose a side.

    “What makes you think they even want to fight? They are fleeing from war and expecting them to fight for a foreign country is a bit ridiculous.”

    A considerable amount of refugees evade their drafts or come for welfare that they can then send back. To ask these to fight for foreign countries would be ridiculous indeed as they are mostly survivalists and usually don’t share as much spiritual commonality. Certain differences might provide an improvement if adapted, others might be a harm. (Though beliefs are quite fluid when the circumstances allow it)
    Scrapping welfare and/or enlisting them to military service would greatly prevent such.
    Though there are refugees that actually would like to live here because they like the west, and these probably would fight.
    I don’t entirely understand AS though as these are both out-groups for him that he claims to oppose…yet suddenly seems to support once they are refugees.

    I think I’ve seen enough and should stop rambling here, but I have to ask again:
    Why are quotes never sourced here?

    I am still offering you my ear AS (or anyone else), if your soul is troubled… or curious.

    My name is the link to PM

  29. AS says:

    @What

    “As far as I’m aware it is not the gentiles that have started to call themselves non-aryans, but you, who is trying to persecute all of them.”

    They started (e.g. from the colonial era onwards) calling themselves by the name of their in-group (e.g. “white”) and others by the name of the outgroup (e.g. “non-white”), whereupon our duty to retaliate begun.

    “You’re being a wholly different sauron all together with an entirely new ring.”

    Whatever Ring we am carrying, we wish to destroy it ASAP.

    “My complaint is that you have actually begun to initiate violence.”

    How?

    “Besides, then why is it you are defining in- and outgroups in the first place?”

    We are not.

    “Those who use retaliatory violence do so not because they enjoy it (exceptions granted) but because it is their duty. As it is our fate to be born into, and live that duty.
    I am however, content to have that duty.”

    Does that imply you would prefer violence to be endlessly initiated so that you can endlessly retaliate against it? If so, then you do indeed enjoy it and hence you are no longer acting out of duty.

    I am content to have the duty of retaliatory violence FOR AS LONG AS NECESSARY. But I would infinitely prefer that the necessity itself disappears (ie. no more initiated violence).

    “Parents usually don’t consciously try to choose the outcome of their reproduction”

    I almost wish I were jaded enough to laugh at this statement.

    “You are the one consciously determining what should come to exist despite never having asked it to, through state controll on reproduction, even though you too can only speculate on its outcome. It is thus (here too) not rationally possible for you to be able to avoid initiatory violence this way.”

    It is impossible to ask what does not yet exist whether or not it consents to exist. Therefore in all cases to bring it into existence is initiated violence. All I am trying to do is STOP such violence.

    If someone unconscious (and therefore unable to give consent) is about to be raped, should I stop the rapist, or should I (according to your argument) let the rape proceed because otherwise I would be the one consciously determining what should come to happen without the consent of the unconscious party that I do so, even though I too can only speculate on the outcome?

    “On the other hand, if you imagine experience as a cross-section of a dimensionally all-present cycle (acknowledging the rational impossibility of a “beginning” and “end” of the universe: At the end of finite possibility can only lie the infinite impossibility, which in turn has to create finite possibility in order to exist. (even all empirical theories of this hint to a cyclical phenomenon))
    [and to fully end reproduction you would have to destroy every cycle of known and unknown dimensions in order for existence to end]”

    I never claimed this was going to be easy.

    “You are men against time, no doubt.”

    Thank you.

    “It is entirely possible for someone to have been dedicated in the past whilst having lost this dedication in the present.”

    If that is your understanding of dedication….. suffice to say you are not worthy to swear any oath.

    What you call “dedication” is what I would describe as mere enthusiasm.

    “If you want to avoid my question”

    I already said: if he has already served his sentence which is assumed to be fair, the incident is over, and he should be treated like anyone else.

    “I asked you what your solution would be and simply provided what had already happened so that you have a context.”

    If you assume his sentence was fair, there is no problem requiring solution.

    @Beetle

    We have debunked the same claim dozens of times before over the years. In fact you debunk it yourself:

    “It was possible for someone of foreign blood to become a member of the German folk but only if that case was approved by the Fuhrer or Ministry of Interior”

    The SNP gets it:

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/refugees-in-scotland-to-be-given-right-to-vote-1-4744219

  30. Beetle says:

    @AS

    You have not debunked anything, you just admitted that someone of foreign blood was able to obtain citizenship ONLY if that person received special approval by the Fuhrer or Ministry of Interior.

    You completely ignored everything I posted that came straight from Hitler and Walter Gross. You do not acknowledge the existence of various races which form the various people that exist on this planet. You disregard racial science and overlook the fact that some races are related while others are not. You ignore countless warnings from National Socialists. Your racial policy has nothing to do with National Socialist Racial Policy. Your definition of race has nothing to do with official NSDAP definition of race. You couldn’t care less about the racial composition of any folk. You do not even understand what the word “exception” means nor do you care about official laws which were created by NSDAP.

    You even debate like a Jew.
    https://i.imgur.com/NtxZi8n.jpg

    “The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day
    before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, and
    if nothing had happened.

    Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday’s defeat, he
    pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the
    previous day he had proved that his statements were correct.” -Adolf Hitler(Mein Kampf)

    My reaction is exactly the same as Hitler’s – “Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more – their quickness in repartee or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them. Yet all this had its good side, because the better I came to know the real leaders, or at least the propagators of Social Democracy, the more did my love for my own people increase
    accordingly.”

    The only differences are that you are Aryanists, not Social Democrats and that I do not hate you, I am only repulsed because you reek of ignorance.

    “I shall have no peace of mind until I have succeeded in planting a seed of Nordic blood wherever the population stand in need of regeneration.” -Adolf Hitler, 12th May 1942

    Do not bother responding to this post because I will not be here to see the response. Thank you for your time and your replies, I will not waste any more time.

    @Volksgeist des Jenseits

    Ethnicity does not matter that much, it all comes down to folk and race.

    “German blood does not form its own race. The German people are made up of representatives of different races. But all these races are characterized by the fact that their blood is mutually compatible and the mixture of these bloods, unlike the blood that is unrelated to them, does not create obstacles and tensions.

    To the German blood, you can, without a doubt, equate the blood of those peoples whose racial makeup is similar to the German people. This applies to all peoples inhabiting the enclosed spaces of Europe. Blood, related to the German, is equally viewed in relation to all its’ properties. Therefore, minorities living in Germany, for example, Poles, Danes, etc. can become citizens of the Reich.” -Robert Ley, Organisationsbuch der NSDAP, 1943., Zentralverlag der NSDAP

    German folk did not consist only of ethnic Germans, people who belonged to other ethnic groups were able to become members of the German folk as long as they were of related blood(those who were of foreign blood needed special approval) and as long as they agreed that they will be loyal to the German folk.

    When it comes to heredity, you can find sections dedicated to that in various NSDAP publications ( such as the handbook for schooling the Hitler Youth – https://mk.christogenea.org/system/files/resources/NaziPrimer-TheHitlerYouthManual.pdf )

  31. @ Beetle

    “He [Alexander the Great] encouraged his pure-blooded Macedonians to marry Persian women — Aryans like themselves who merely spoke a different language and had different customs, — but, significantly enough, not women of other races. And both his own foreign wives were of Aryan blood. In other words, whether he acted in this connection in full, clear consciousness, or through some vague intuition — an intuition of genius, however vague it might have been, — he seems to have been, in our advanced Dark Age, one of the first great forerunners of true racialism as opposed to narrow State-patriotism.” ~Miguel Serrano, Adolf Hitler: The Ultimate Avatar

    Princess Diana did more or less the same when she paired with Dodi Fayed.

  32. @AS

    “They started (e.g. from the colonial era onwards) calling themselves by the name of their in-group (e.g. “white”) and others by the name of the outgroup (e.g. “non-white”), whereupon our duty to retaliate begun.”

    Just as you have, since the creation of your ideology, to call yourselves an in-group (aryan) and the rest an outgroup (non-aryan), whereupon someone’s duty to retaliate will begin.

    “Does that imply you would prefer violence to be endlessly initiated so that you can endlessly retaliate against it? If so, then you do indeed enjoy it and hence you are no longer acting out of duty.”

    Stop attempting to accuse me of what seems to be your own pathology.

    “We are not.” (defining in- and outgroups)

    http://aryanism.net/about/glossary/
    http://aryanism.net/culture/aryan-race/

    “How?” (You are initiating violence)

    You have just admitted it yourself in fact:

    ”It is impossible to ask what does not yet exist whether or not it consents to exist. Therefore in all cases to bring it into existence is initiated violence. All I am trying to do is STOP such violence.”

    “Therefore in all cases”

    Let’s take this further:
    By your own standard, and as non-humanist, every second you are alive would therefore be initiatory violence as your cells reproduce without consent. Agriculture would be initiatory violence too as you could not have possibly asked the plant if it wants to grow or be devoured by you. All life is one. Or are you shifting the definitions of groups (again) to be say, “Animalists”? By shifting the divide further down to plants you have, according to you own definition of the “herder archetype”, openly and directly exposed yourself as a jew if that is the case.

    “…herder archetype. It is expressed in dishonest tribalists who prefer to use mostly deception and manipulation – including pretending to be universalists when it suits their interests – to subdue their victims. We consider a significant and disproportionately influential minority of historical and modern humans to belong to this archetype, and call them Jews”

    “If someone unconscious (and therefore unable to give consent) is about to be raped, should I stop the rapist, or should I (according to your argument) let the rape proceed because otherwise I would be the one consciously determining what should come to happen without the consent of the unconscious party that I do so, even though I too can only speculate on the outcome?”

    That’s simply a false analogy. The consent of a sexual act can be determined before it happens because the phenomenons origin comes from the conscious world itself; if someone has to be put from a conscious to unconscious state for something to happen it should be obvious that there is something severely wrong.
    That cannot be the case with birth because birth is the emergence of the phenomenon of the conscious world out of the unconscious.
    Following your logic there are practically two options: To ask the child (once it is conscious) if it feels to have been violated by existing or not, and if yes (really though, most people change their mind about their content on existence depending on their level of conscious and/or emotional state) and then punish the parents for something that has been deemed a crime after it has been committed.
    Now that’s just silly.
    Or deem all births a crime in which turn again, you couldn’t eat or live at all without having to retaliate against yourself for producing new cells.
    And that’s even sillier.

    And here you are, proposing for all aryans to reproduce because you believe that when your kind reproduce (commit violence) the outcome will be positive whereas when non-aryans reproduce (commit violence) the outcome will be negative.
    Now if that is not the double standard of an in- and out-group you have described I do not know what it is. Neither did you call out the indifference when I spoke about retaliatory birth so that I can only assume you are using the argument in you favour when it suits you.

    (You yourself have stated that aryans themselves are an outcome of non-aryans when you said:

    “Aryan traits are not – contrary to what Hitler espoused – the work of Nature, but an evolutionary accident that Nature has since been trying to correct.”

    According to your perspective life itself would be an in- and out-group double standard; Nothing wants to be born yet nothing wants to die, nothing wants to be killed, yet nothing wants to starve.
    It does thereby not wonder me that you contradict yourself so often, because it is again your failure here to see all life as the only global absolute, so instead you assert your individual absolute as the global absolute, in turn making you pathologically related to zionists.
    The difference being that you seek world dominance not to enslave but to destroy entirely.

    Whew! What an improvement!

    “SOMEONE has to carry the Ring long enough (and even use it on occasions!) to transport it to where it can be destroyed.”

    You’ve just openly admitted to being Boromir in your own analogy. This isn’t LOTR where the weapon is a physical artefact that has to be geographically moved so it can be destroyed through force; it’s a metaphysical and natural principle that if one wishes to destroy, must be consciously avoided to begin with, not consciously carried and occasionally used when necessary.

    It’s not anyone’s fault but your own that you do not wish for existence to be, as this is a result of your own conscience. Why though must you initiate violence against everyone who does wish for existence to be?
    If you claim now that naturalism and idealism are diametrically opposed or even a dichotomy I must remind you that nature is an ideal you yourself partially advocate.
    http://aryanism.net/culture/
    on almost all links of that directory,
    And due to that, there is no reason naturalism itself cannot be a form of idealism.

    “Naturalists only care that it is their own camp which wins the game, regardless of what cause it ended up embracing along the way to victory. Idealists, in contrast, do not care whether it is our camp or another camp of idealists who win the game, so long as the winner (whoever it may be) supports the cause that we support.”

    That’s just linguistic deception. What you are describing there is survivalism vs idealism.
    A naturalist only cares that nature triumphs regardless of who or what comes out triumphant. When you define your camp as idealists opposed to natures will, you have merely created a false dichotomy, nothing more.

    “What you call “dedication” is what I would describe as mere enthusiasm.”

    That’s a fair point actually, in such cases it most likely was enthusiasm for the cause, but does not logically exlude dedication, rather only implies that the true dedication lies somewhere else.
    You yourself example this too however when you describe fascism as utilitarian tool to NS.
    So if there was suddenly a better alternative than fascism to realise NS, would you say you’ve been merely enthusiastic about fascism in the past or that you were dedicated in using it?

    “If that is your understanding of dedication….. suffice to say you are not worthy to swear any oath.”

    Don’t condition yourself to make ad hominems instead of adressing points as you tend to be so far, remember, it is you who advocates unity through nobility here.
    Or is it that you don’t feel the need convince the “inferiors”? But then again how would you know if they’re inferior by mocking them instead of engaging, that seems ridiculous. Unless you imply that truly noble people could never be deceived, which is in fact equally ridiculous.

    -““Parents usually don’t consciously try to choose the outcome of their reproduction””

    “While empirical knowledge has always existed, the empirical knowledge in ancient times was based on trivial observations that anyone could make.”
    “Thus, whereas empirical conclusions can only ever be demonstrated to be false (via contrary evidence…”

    So provide contrary evidence, you have no need to laugh. It is even logical, how could they consciously determine what the outcome of their fused genes are through natural attraction and copulation?
    https://www.dogsforgood.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Jason-Zeke-fullsize.jpg

    “If you assume his sentence was fair, there is no problem requiring solution.”

    Maybe you didn’t understand the question then because that was not even the main issue.
    The man had his asylum appeal rejected
    (which admittedly I assumed was related to the crime but apparently isn’t, as I had then quoted) but you also oppose all deportation.
    So I ask again: What would you do?
    Accept everyone? Reject such at the Border?
    But he was already here and then got rejected, so now what? Forget about it?

    “The SNP gets it:”

    Indeed they do.

    “Scotland is a welcoming country and our intention to extend the opportunity to vote to all those who are legally resident in Scotland, whatever their place of birth, should include refugees and asylum seekers.”

    “Legally resident”; which to me implies that it is those who were accepted for asylum, excluding those who are rejected.

    “I almost wish I were jaded enough to laugh at this statement.”

    I almost wish I was still in puberty so this site wouldn’t have to make sense and I too could just be angry at the world. You remind me of when the hormonal madness of puberty hit me and poisoned my worldview through all the mainstream/modern conditioning during that time:

    “As such, those who wish to deceive us can use a wholly factual presentation to do so, simply by reporting some facts and omitting others. Nothing they report need be false for the overall picture to be misleading. For example, by feeding us only stories of chaos and incompetence”

    You have been nothing but betraying your natural self since then and through this sites hypocrisy have shown that even dedicated efforts still cannot defy ones own nature.

    Now that is what I wish I were jaded enough to laugh at.

  33. AS says:

    @Beetle

    “You have not debunked anything, you just admitted that someone of foreign blood was able to obtain citizenship ONLY if that person received special approval by the Fuhrer or Ministry of Interior.”

    In other words, the decision of the state overrides ethnocentrist theories as necessary.

    ““I shall have no peace of mind until I have succeeded in planting a seed of Nordic blood wherever the population stand in need of regeneration.” -Adolf Hitler, 12th May 1942″

    In other words, Hitler has no problem with a multiethnic gene pool so long as it leads to regeneration. Just like Portugal today:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfKle0Lgoj8

    What we are currently doing is REGENERATING anti-Zionism in the EU via infusion of time-tested reliably anti-Zionist blood. It is working rather well, as you can read about in our latest post:

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/anti-zionist-harvest-uk/

    @VdJ

    “Just as you have, since the creation of your ideology, to call yourselves an in-group (aryan) and the rest an outgroup (non-aryan),”

    “Aryan” = [those who reject in-group/outgroup thinking]
    “non-Aryan” = [those who do not reject in-group/ougroup thinking]

    You are either very slow or altogether disingenuous.

    “By your own standard, and as non-humanist, every second you are alive would therefore be initiatory violence as your cells reproduce without consent.”

    As I keep saying, SOMEONE has to carry the Ring long enough to take it to where it can be destroyed.

    “Agriculture would be initiatory violence too as you could not have possibly asked the plant if it wants to grow or be devoured by you.”

    We cover this issue in the final section of this page:

    http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/agrarianism/

    “deem all births a crime”

    This.

    “in which turn again, you couldn’t eat or live at all without having to retaliate against yourself for producing new cells”

    Again, SOMEONE has to carry the Ring long enough to take it to where it can be destroyed.

    “And here you are, proposing for all aryans to reproduce because you believe that when your kind reproduce (commit violence) the outcome will be positive whereas when non-aryans reproduce (commit violence) the outcome will be negative.”

    If I and a similarly Aryan person of opposite gender were the only two people left in the world, we would not reproduce because we are innately opposed to initiating violence. If two non-Aryans of opposite gender were the only two people left in the world, they would almost certainly reproduce because they do not care.

    If both pairs described above were left in the world, what should the Aryan pair do to minimize violence? Should we personally refrain from reproducing and expect the non-Aryan pair to follow our example? That is Jainism (a.k.a. asking to fail).

    “According to your perspective life itself would be an in- and out-group double standard; Nothing wants to be born yet nothing wants to die, nothing wants to be killed, yet nothing wants to starve.”

    The solution is to end reproduction.

    “You’ve just openly admitted to being Boromir in your own analogy.”

    No, Boromir is opposed to destroying the Ring. I have been saying almost nothing EXCEPT that the Ring must be destroyed.

    “It’s not anyone’s fault but your own that you do not wish for existence to be, as this is a result of your own conscience. Why though must you initiate violence against everyone who does wish for existence to be?”

    I am not initiating violence; I am only preventing them from reproducing and hence initiating violence against yet more victims.

    “So if there was suddenly a better alternative than fascism to realise NS, would you say you’ve been merely enthusiastic about fascism in the past or that you were dedicated in using it?”

    I have never been enthusiastic about fascism, much less dedicated to it. Whenever I write positively about it, I do so with suppressed disgust.

    “So provide contrary evidence”

    Why is the word “cuck” an insult?

    “But he was already here and then got rejected, so now what?”

    Conscript him into the military and give him citizenship after he has completed his service (like what I have already been saying in earlier comments).

    ““Legally resident”; which to me implies that it is those who were accepted for asylum, excluding those who are rejected.”

    The state has no legal authority to reject. This is explained here:

    the only people obliged to abide by any given law of any country are those who receive protection from the same law in return. For example, we are obliged to not steal because in return the state will protect our property. We are obliged to not run red lights because in return we get to use the safer roads that result from traffic lights. And so on. This principle breaks down when it comes to immigration, because those who abide by a so-called “law” that prohibits them from entering are not in any way protected by this same so-called “law”. On the contrary, they are simply left outside where the state need not care about them at all (and can even bomb them)! Thus so-called “laws” prohibiting immigration are not really laws at all, but tyranny.

    http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/immigration/

    Meanwhile:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/08/07/trump-and-stephen-miller-are-now-targeting-legal-immigrants-and-it-will-get-uglier/

  34. @AS

    “Conscript him into the military and give him citizenship after he has completed his service (like what I have already been saying in earlier comments).”

    As have I, good we can agree.
    And adding; a civil service branch of the military should be even more important, for the older or those who might not be in top physical condition.
    And its expansion will be paramount.
    You cannot wage a physical war against jewry without beckoning your own death. Military must be purely disciplinary if it is to be at all.
    - Jewry IS material warfare. -
    We must fight peoples minds, until the jew stands alone with his weapons of destruction, and is forced, to shed off of himself, the jewry.

    “Thus so-called “laws” prohibiting immigration are not really laws at all, but tyranny.”
    “The state has no legal authority to reject.”

    Indeed there should only be a law on admission, which is for anyone who wishes to come to be enlisted in state services if nothing has been found in the private sector prior to arrival. Thus rejection is left to the individual himself who chooses to avoid his duty.

    And by the way, attempting to slander or insult someone you consider lower, is too, tyranny.
    “You are either very slow or altogether disingenuous.”
    Just stop. You do not know me and you are making your nobility very unbelievable to me, and very unattractive to anyone with it.
    It signifies an emotional instability, for which I am still offering an ear.

    ____


    “Aryan” = [those who reject in-group/outgroup thinking]
    “non-Aryan” = [those who do not reject in-group/ougroup thinking]

    “Those who, and those who do not”
    This is in itself an in-group outgroup thinking I must reject.
    We are all part of a greater essence, and there is only one group. The group of existence that is on the path to Arhat. We are merely in different stages.
    Thus It can NEVER be my mission to divide these stages against each other as that is the very defiance of any nobility. I can only ever wait for the seeds of thought and example to pry open the light of that which does not see with the eye, and for the seed of existence to mature.

    “That is Jainism (a.k.a. asking to fail).”

    No, you are just impatient because it is your ego that wants you to witness the change. You have not looked outside of yourself enough.
    Providence IS on our side, our side just isn’t the side of the individual.
    Hitlers “loss” has nothing to do with lack of lighting. In fact, to consider it a loss in the first place is entirely missing the bigger picture of the spiritou-mechanical universe.
    (As for the prohpets… should they have had more lightning too?) I doubt it. It would defy their whole purpose.

    “We cover this issue in the final section of this page:

    http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/agrarianism/

    “deem all births a crime”

    This.”

    “The solution is to end reproduction.”

    Too bad plants also reproduce cells. Or is cellular reproduction somehow something different?
    Even matter reproduces… look at the stars. In-fact it is matter that causes reproduction to be violent in the first place.
    So the only way to attain salvation from existential violence is to complete its full cyclical path until existence has evolved into a universe of non-violent immaterial existence.

    “I am not initiating violence; I am only preventing them from reproducing and hence initiating violence against yet more victims.”
    You are initiating violence against all which you, nor anyone fully understands, simply because your current understanding causes you to percieve it as a crime.
    ____

    “As I keep saying, SOMEONE has to carry the Ring long enough to take it to where it can be destroyed.”

    Frodo as a carrier was cast away, alone (well with a helper who was not much help and even a risk at times emphasizing that he should’ve been alone!) in order for the battle to be able to avoid the ring and thus cannot corrupt the fight.
    Boromir however was so attached to the material existence of this ring that he could see the only possibility of saurons defeat through the transference and use of the ring.
    Theres only the ring you try to keep around, under the false pretense that it need be in order for it’s effects to be destroyed.
    You have admitted to being boromir again.

    _____

    “I have never been enthusiastic about fascism, much less dedicated to it. Whenever I write positively about it, I do so with suppressed disgust.”

    “I do so with suppressed disgust.”

    Then as a self proclaimed noble, you should already know you are on the wrong path.
    It is begging the time for an entirely new idea.

    _____

    “Why is the word “cuck” an insult?”

    Perhaps because the current remnants of tribalism still infer an emotional connection to the partner rather than to the whole of being.
    That still has nothing to do with what I said.

  35. AS SOON AS YOU SINGLE SOMEONE OUT YOU ARE A TRIBE.
    THE FIRST MURDER!
    THE FIRST TRIBALIST!!!?!!
    No matter how you bend it with all your trickery and language, you are the JEW!!!!!!!!!!!
    YOU ARE THE JEEEEWWW.

    UNDERSTAND OTTO WEINIGER, BUT DO NOT KILL YOURSELF AS YOU ARE ALL LIFE.

    “Perhaps the great merit of Jewishness lies in continually leading Aryan man towards self-consciousness, in warning him to remain what he is. The Aryan should almost be grateful to the Jew. Through the Jew, he comes to know precisely what he must guard himself against: namely, Jewishness as a possibility within himself.”

    Now don’t make me angry by insulting me you fucking jew!!

  36. COME KILL ME AGAIN AHAHAHAHA

  37. THE MOMENT YOU UNDERSTAND IS THE MOMENT GOD IS IN YOU.

    GOD IS.

    Through the wave, to beginning but an end, beyond any sea of skies!!!!!!

  38. Jews worship the first murderer.

    Thats all it is brother. And all it needs is a change of mind. Why are you in a rush brother? Do you know how long it takes for the recommencimg to come? Do you even know how to achieve it???
    No one does…

    Only being does.

  39. We live in an age where we have managed to get communicational devices orbiting the Earth and with the corresponding device there’s the obvious chance to easily make every human being connected to one. Do you not understand what age we live in? what opportunity this is? Do you not truly understand?
    This is the never before chance for humanity to be ONE tribe WITH ALL OF NATURE! EVERYTHING IS TRUE!
    The entire problem has been eliminated!!!!??!???!?!!
    LOOK AT THE DEVICE YOU ARE STARING AT RIGHT NOW! LOOK AT IT!

    THE IDEA IS ALL THAT MATTERS!

    ALL INFORMATION WE HAVE EVER CREATED AND RECORDED! DOMESTICATE EVERY HUMAN BEING ON EARTH TO IT  AND THE GENES COME!

  40. IT IS WHAT NATURE WILLED US TO DO.

  41. AS says:

    @VdJ

    Do not spam.

    “We are all part of a greater essence, and there is only one group.”

    You are a monist. We are dualists.

    “Thus It can NEVER be my mission”

    Good. We do not want you.

    “So the only way to attain salvation from existential violence is to complete its full cyclical path until existence has evolved into a universe of non-violent immaterial existence.”

    That is communism:

    “The Jew, Mardochee Marx, like the good Jew that he was, was awaiting the coming of the Messiah. He has placed the Messiah conception in a setting of historic materialism by asserting that terrestrial happiness is a factor in an almost endless process of evolution. “Happiness is within your reach,” he says, “that I promise you. But you must let evolution take its course and not try to hurry matters.” Mankind always falls for a specious trick of that sort.” – Adolf Hitler

    http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-communism/

    We could never accept any such oxymoronic “evolved universe of non-violent immaterial existence” that was (for crying out loud) BUILT ON violence initiated in the past (ie. innocents were purposefully sacrificed in order to bring it into being)? We would reject it the same way we reject medicine whose development involved animal testing. Indeed it would be our duty to destroy it in order to avenge the sacrificial victims.

    That you could accept it, however, tells me all I need to know about you. You have just offered to me the same kind of ‘salvation’ that parents offer to children: “When you become an adult we won’t control you any more.” THE VIOLENCE HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE BY THEN! NOTHING CAN COMPENSATE FOR IT!

    “Theres only the ring you try to keep around, under the false pretense that it need be in order for it’s effects to be destroyed.”

    Frodo could not have reached Mount Doom without putting the Ring on at numerous points during the journey.

    “You have admitted to being boromir again.”

    You are being slow or disingenuous again. If I were Boromir, I would be saying that it is no problem for Aryans to reproduce indefinitely. I do not say this.

  42. Also… Americans! Support Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez! She very well could have taken the torch from Cynthia McKinney.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/08/10/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-and-the-khazarian-gangsters-square-off/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>