Our enemies argue that hostility towards Jews is incoherent with rightism:
Given that Jews tend to prosper mightily in Western civilization, it is not clear why they should want to destroy it
This is what we said first more than a decade ago. There has in fact never been another civilization in history in which Jews prospered anywhere near as much as they prospered in post-Renaissance Western civilization. Therefore those for whom it makes sense to destroy Western civilization are not Jews, but rather those who hate Jews, such as ourselves!
The bitterness, I noted, resemble the hostility of many blacks toward whites. Blacks, at the bottom of society, apparently need someone to blame. Similarly the commenters appeared to resent the Jews for being much more successful that house-and-garden-variety whites (Hagvacas). Might the causes be the same: a resentment of a superior people accompanied by an unwillingness to admit the superiority? The infuriated seemed willing, indeed eager, to point to the inferiority of blacks to themselves but, mysteriously, not their own inferiority to Jews. An oversight, no doubt.
Either one believes that Western civilization is a fair rewarder (the coherent rightist position), in which case one must believe that both Jews and (non-Jewish) “whites” deserve their greater success, or one believes that Western civilization is an unfair rewarder (the coherent leftist position), in which case one must believe that neither Jews nor (non-Jewish) “whites” deserve their greater success. BS adherents, however, want to believe that (non-Jewish) “whites” deserve their success but that Jews do not. This is no different than Trump calling a poll ‘fake’ when he polls poorly but not when someone whom he dislikes polls poorly.
Among IQists, it is doctrine that blacks have a mean IQ of 85, fifteen points below the Hagvaca average of 100, and this is held to account for the lack of success of blacks. Searching the literature reveals authorities asserting that Ashkenazi Jews have a mean IQ of 115, as far above ordinary or Hagvaca whites as whites are above blacks. Eureka, and all. Equal differences of input produce equal differences of outcome. N’est-ce pas?
Exactly. The only meaningful debate should be whether a civilization that rewards people with higher IQ test scores is a civilization that should be allowed to exist. On this, rightists believe it should* whereas True Leftists believe it should not.
(* So do most False Leftists, who hence pathetically try to find ways to eliminate the gaps in IQ test scores…..)
Ashkenazim skills in verbal reasoning, comprehension, working memory, and mathematics are simply astounding — the group averages 125 on an IQ test of verbal reasoning. Since 1950, 29 percent of Nobel Prizes have been awarded to Ashkenazi Jews, who represent a mere 0.25 percent of the global population.
But continuing with the enemy article:
This engenders assertions that the IQ tests are biased, that Jewish success arises from collusion, that it’s culture, that it’s dishonesty and lack of principle — all of which closely parallel the assertions of blacks against whites.
No. “Blacks” who complain about IQ tests at least do not claim the tests are unbiased when it shows themselves having higher scores.
The “black” complaint, if any, is structurally the True Left complaint: that high IQ test scores do not imply high quality – which should have been beyond self-evident as soon as we look at the IQ test scores of those responsible for any of the following:
If high IQ test scores really did imply high quality, people with high IQ test scores would still have the same IQ test scores, but they would have voluntarily refrained from applying their intelligence in such horrific ways. Perhaps some individuals did refrain. But the rest did not. And it is those who did not who are admired and promoted by Western civilization.
Continuing with the enemy article:
The IQ difference if you do the numbers means that one Hagvaca in six is as smart as the average Jew, just as one black in six is as smart as the average white. It also means that if two percent of whites are at IQ 130, the cutoff for Mensa, then two percent of Jews have IQs of 145 or higher (which, according to some estimates is entry level for Wall Street, which is where money is. The nature of a bell-shaped distribution is such that at progressively higher IQs, the numerical advantage grows.
The disproportion in achievement is stark. Of the four founding titans of the internet, Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Bill Gates of Microsoft, two are Jews. For that matter, of the three most influential thinkers of the nineteenth century, Freud, Marx, and Darwin, two were Jews. Check the personnel list for the Manhattan Project (for readers born after the end of education, this was the project that made the atomic bomb.) It reads like a Yeshiva yearbook. The fathers of modern physics were heavily Jewish — Niels Bohr, Albert Einstein, Max Born, Wolfgang Pauli, Hans Bethe, Robert Oppenheimer, Albert Michelson, on and on. More recently, figures like John von Neuman and Feynman. Similar lists could be made in publishing, journalism, finance, and film.
Now imagine how much better a place the world would be if none of the individuals above (Jewish or non-Jewish) had ever existed. And then imagine how much better still it would be if Western civilization as a whole had never existed.
This goes on today. There is the EPR paradox, basis of quantum communication (Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen). Commerce on the internet depends on public-key encryption RSA Security: Rivest, Shamir, Adelman.
Similarly, imagine how much better we could make the future just by discontinuing all these bloodlines.
And it is amusing that so many people who detest Jews worship one, and have built huge numbers of churches and cathedrals in which to do it.
Jesus did not reproduce, therefore he was not a Jew. If the parents of all the individuals listed above had behaved like Jesus, we would already be living in the world I just described. And Jesus never invented any machines either. Imagine if Christians actually followed Jesus’ example! (This is why I do not take seriously any machinists who claim to be “Christian”, unless they at least put a “Judeo-” in front of it.)
Of course members of a small, superior, self-aware group disliked by the surrounding population are going to help each other, this being regarded as group sneakiness. But how do you sneakily come up with General Relativity? Or sneakily win a world chess championship? Maybe with magnets secretly placed under the board to move the other guy’s pieces when he isn’t looking. That would work. But doesn’t this sound like complaints against systemic racism? People who sleep in bus stations can collude. Can they found megatech companies?
The question we should be asking is: would the world be a better place if megatech companies did not exist? Those who would prefer a world without megatech companies now know which bloodlines we need to eliminate first.
In a lifetime in Journalism, I have known a lot of Jews, and noticed that they respect intelligence. Their standards are high. A friend in Washington was Herb Berkowitz, a raucous Boston Jew and Head flack at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative thinktank. And also veteran of many memorable pub crawls with me and other reporters on the Scuzz and Suds circuit, but that is another story. Anyway the subject of SATs came up and Herb said, “You have to have 1400 just to have bragging rights.” In those pre-dumbing down days, 1300 got you into Mensa, so he was talking IQs well above 130. A Jewish friend, a former Harvard prof, assures me that young Jewish women carry a marry-a-doctor gene, which doubtless contributes to evolutionary proliferation of intelligence.
If Western civilization does not die soon, it will not be long until AI will have more powerful intelligence than all Jews ever to have lived combined. Then what?
Jews respect intelligence because intelligence is useful for material acquisition, which is what motivates Jews (who worship Yahweh, the creator of the material world). Those who are not motivated by greed have no reason to respect intelligence, and certainly would not want to build the inferior type of civilization which rewards it. We would much rather build civilizations which reward traits associated with ethical and even aesthetical elevation, such as empathy, sensitivity, etc.. Unfortunately, since we exist in the material world, the superior civilization which more weakly rewards intelligence will, given enough time, be outcompeted by the inferior civilization which more strongly rewards intelligence. The colonial era was a preview of this:
The only way to prevent this is for the former to unite to proactively destroy the latter before the latter has time to outcompete them.