The following has been on the main site for a long time:
National Socialist Germany banned the highly popular novels of Sax Rohmer (Jew), creator of the fictional villain Fu Manchu designed to perpetuate “Yellow Peril” paranoia in Western countries. Rohmer retaliated by claiming that he did not understand the reason for the ban as his novels were intended to be coherent with what he called ”Nazi ideals”.
Now our enemies admit it:
In the 1932 film The Mask of Fu Manchu, the vile Dr. Fu Manchu (played by Boris Karloff) explains his goals for a Pan-Asian empire to an assembly of warlords: “[C]onquer and breed. Conquer the white man . . . and take his women!”
The idea that the Orient and the Occident will forever be at war, and that the East wants to defeat the West biologically, came from Sax Rohmer, the working-class Brummie who wrote The Mystery of Dr. Fu Manchu in 1913. Rohmer’s novel is widely credited with creating the literary pulp-fiction genre, the “Yellow Peril.”
Since the rise of the New Left of the 1960s, Asian scholars have earned praise and grant money by railing against the Anglo pulp fiction of yesteryear. Whole books and classes are dedicated to the “paranoia” of anti-Asian sentiment and the “pervasive” racism of Western society. These modern studies focus almost exclusively on attitudes towards Chinese immigration.
Ironically, the first country to ban Rohmer’s “Yellow Peril” yarns was Nazi Germany in 1936. Although Rohmer insisted that “my stories are not inimical to Nazi ideals,” the Third Reich banned Fu Manchu as both degenerate and the work of a suspected Jew.
As always, I am happy to achieve academic agreement with our enemies. On this occasion, our enemies concede not only that “The idea that the Orient and the Occident will forever be at war”, as sincerely believed by Westerners of every historical period up to and including ours:
https://presentdangerchina.org/guiding-principles/ (Steve Bannon)
is on the contrary regarded by National Socialists as a degenerate Jewish trick, which is what we have been saying all along:
Jews have even learned to manipulate the shallower levels of blood memory in order to incite interethnic hostility between different groups of non-Jews, including by (ironically) projecting Turanian evils onto non-Turanian groups. For example, as a consequence of repeated Turanian invasions into the Danube region (and beyond), from the prehistorical Funnelbeaker and Yamna expansions to the historical Hun and Mongol incursions (plus countless smaller-scale raids through the millenia), the valid fear of an aggressive Turanian east is vividly embedded in Midgard blood memory. Zionist propaganda, however, has managed to rewire this into a fear of the so-called “Oriental” civilizations by downplaying the Turanian component and focusing attention on the eastern component, leading to popular memes such as ”Yellow Peril”, “Turban Tide”, “Islamofascism”, etc. and hence misguided hostility towards people from the regions south of the Turanian steppe who were in reality fellow historical victims of Turanian aggression, and hence who (in a sane world) ought to have been regarded as obvious allies in any genuine anti-Turanist – including anti-Zionist – movement.
but also that what they call the “the rise of the New Left of the 1960s” (what we call the Counterculture) was indeed a continuation of the National Socialist anti-colonial narrative, which is also what we have been saying all along:
This is the only narrative that accounts for the rise of National Socialism and the development of post-WWII pop culture trends not as distinct phenomena, but as two forms of the same phenomenon: UNITY THROUGH NOBILITY. The 19th century Romantic movement in art gathered the energy for National Socialism in politics during the early 20th century (a point which Hitler explicitly acknowledged by crediting the influence of Wagner on his movement). With its political outlet attenuated by defeat in war, this energy was then recycled back into art by the late 20th century, coming full-circle.
Otto Remer not only foiled the plot but remained loyal to Hitler’s anti-colonialist vision even after WWII, arming the FLN for combat against France in the Algerian War (the same war in which far-rightists Jean-Marie Le Pen (Gentile) and Dominique Venner (Gentile) fought on the side of France). This showed once and for all which side was truly dedicated to National Socialism as a higher ideal. Similarly, the admiration for Hitler by figures such as John F. Kennedy (who was assassinated when he began trying to free the US from Jewish domination and to limit the power of Israel, and who also enforced school desegregation, created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, called for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and promoted the US as ”A Nation of Immigrants” via his book of the same name in which he argued for less restrictive immigration laws) makes little sense to those who insist that National Socialism was a right-wing ideology, but makes perfect sense to those who understand it as a left-wing ideology.
The Beatles, roundly condemned by post-WWII rightists as underminers of traditional Western values, found a sympathetic listener in Rudolf Hess from his lifelong solitary confinement inside Spandau Prison: “The youth of today are protesting for many reasons and they want to be heard. One way of being heard is through their music. I do enjoy the Beatles however; their music has a definite beat and in many ways their music is good music.” (In fact, the only element of the 1960s youth culture that Hess ever criticized was its drug use.)
As for “Whole books and classes are dedicated to the “paranoia” of anti-Asian sentiment and the “pervasive” racism of Western society. These modern studies focus almost exclusively on attitudes towards Chinese immigration.”, guess who started this:
Alfred Rosenberg uses the Far East as an example: “To forbid immigration to North America and Australia to the Yellow races, but at the same time to wish to colonise or rule the far east, is a Capitalist insanity … It is possible that the misused technology of the Whites still triumphs today. It is possible that the Yellow man is pushed back, throttled. But then he will necessarily turn his face in other directions … Bismarck’s words, The Yellow men will one day water their camels in the Rhine, may find fulfilment.”
Rosenberg was not telling his readers that immigration would not happen; he was saying that immigration would happen and moreover that it is well justified on account of Western colonialism. Today’s immigrant advocates:
are merely elaborating on a position that National Socialism had already proposed almost a century ago!
So what is the remainder of the above enemy article about? Admitting that National Socialist anti-colonialism is the correct worldview after all? Not a chance. The point of their article is to distance themselves from Hitler & Co. (which we are always glad to see them do), and side ever more unrepentantly with Western civilization (which is why we must fight them):
Created by the Belgian illustrator Edgar P. Jacobs, the Blake and Mortimer series began on September 26, 1946, with the publication of a short story called “The U Ray” in Tintin magazine. An expanded version become The Secret of the Swordfish in 1950, and the final graphic novel in the series was published in 1953 .The stories were about Jacobs’s two principle characters: the Scottish scientist Philip Mortimer and his friend Captain Francis Blake of MI5. Blake and Mortimer, much like the Hammer films of the 1950s and 1960s, added futurist technology and modern sensibilities to otherwise deeply Victorian tales. Call it pop culture archaeofuturism or pulp fascism, but Blake and Mortimer reflected a populist European desire to maintain the order, stability, and glory of empire.
Many on the dissident Right praise Japan as an ethnostate and even defend its goals during the Second World War, but Jacobs and his generation saw things differently. For them, the Japanese army saw it as its divine mission to “lead the people of Asia out of slavery to the white man” . This meant not only invading British Hong Kong, British Singapore, British Burma, French Indochina, the Dutch East Indies, and American Philippines, but also forcing white POWs to clean Chinese and Korean streets like coolies  to humble them before Asian crowds. Interning and raping white and Eurasian families on Java had the same purpose .
Jacobs died at age 82 in 1987. Since then, Belgian writers and cartoonists have kept the Blake and Mortimer characters alive in comic books and on television. The imperialism of the Jacobs originals is still alive, too. Written by Yves Sente and drawn by Peter Van Dongen and Teun Berserik, The Valley of the Immortals, which was translated into English just last year, returns to the Yellow Peril themes of The Secret of the Swordfish.
These stories remain popular and even critically celebrated. In 2004, Paris’s Palais de Chaillot hosted a huge exhibit of Blake and Mortimer. Between 1997 and 1998, French children gobbled up the Blake and Mortimer cartoon, and in 2014 it was announced that the beloved duo would finally get a new comic strip. English speakers in 2019 can enjoy old translations of the series and new editions thanks to British publisher Cinebook, all of which are available on Amazon and other online retailers.
Although Blake and Mortimer are virtually unknown to Americans, they rank with Tintin and Asterix as the most popular comic-book heroes in Europe. Fans have bought more than 15 million copies, and the new incarnations sell in the hundreds of thousands.
The enduring popularity of Blake and Mortimer shows that readers in the West still want imperial adventures about strong white men. Blake and Mortimer are not the weaklings who live in London or Brussels today. They are like the hardy men who settled the American West, the Pioneer Column that planted the Union Jack in Rhodesia, and the British soldiers who fought two world wars to protect the Empire. French-speaking children love Blake and Mortimer; we should too. They are a reminder of our past and an inspiration for our future.
And guess what? We predicted this too!
Furthermore, we must never believe the WN lie that their ambitions are solely defensive, just as we have never believed that Israel is solely defensive. WNs may say in public that they have no interest in dominating others or taking the territory of others, but this can be proven as a lie even from their own 14 Words motto. When they say “We must secure the existence of our people…”, it logically follows that if dominating others or taking the territory of others is conducive to ”white” security, that is what they will do. And it is quite practically obvious that the more domination and the more territory they possess, the more secure they will be, so their ideology actually commands them to dominate people and capture territory to whatever extent is beneficial to the security of their tribe, contrary to what they claim in public. Anyone who thinks ”white”-only intentional communities (“PLE”s) are not dangerous should study how Israel was created in 1949 from similar Jew-only intentional communities. The Palestinians are paying for their naiveity.
“Let me just make this very clear: I don’t give a flying fuck about national determination. ‘Nationalism for all nations…’, ‘The Turks should have their own nation…’, I don’t give a flying fuck about the destiny of the Turkish people. We should rip Constantinople, entire Eurasia, from them. We should throw every Turk into the ocean. I do not care about them. I do not give a flying fuck about them. … I will only be satisfied, I will only know that the white race is back, that we are once again a powerful people, when we unify and take back all of Eurasia. … That is what I believe. This is what the world is about. The world is fundamentally about power, it’s about people who are willing and able to use power for the benefit of our race. That is what existence on this planet is fundamentally about.” – Richard Spencer (Gentile)
Anyone with any geopolitical sense is able to see that WNs want “white” ethnostates in the way that Jews wanted a Jewish ethnostate: as a launchpad for an eventual second round of colonialism for the sake of “white” security in the none-too-distant future (just as Greater Israel is unquestionably for the sake of Jewish security).
With a few substitutions of proper nouns, Spencer’s speech sounds like a speech Fu Manchu would give to his warlords. But, unlike Fu Manchu, Spencer exists in real life.