Our enemies concede that Judaism is rightist

https://www.amren.com/features/2018/09/anti-racism-the-trojan-horse-for-the-great-replacement/

Some people believe in a Jewish plot to orchestrate the great replacement and promote terrorism. It is worth remembering that cosmopolitanism, which is a Hellenic invention, has no roots in Judaism. It is certainly a fact that cosmopolitanism is now defended by some Jewish intellectual elites, but they are decadents who represent only themselves. They despise the community from which they come, and seem to have little sympathy for the Jews who fall under the blows of Muslims.

Cosmopolitanism runs counter to the sacred texts of Judaism. The civilizational manifestation of the Old Testament, the Talmud, or Kabbalah is not cosmopolitanism, let alone bourgeois materialism. It is the sovereign nation, homogeneous in terms of race, and aristocratic-warlike in terms of values. George Soros’s “open society” is an ideal that owes nothing to Judaism; it owes everything to the Gnostic heresy of Christianity and the cosmopolitanism of Diogenes the Cynic.

Thank you. We told you so. Ten years ago FFS.

(But seriously, GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY. They are finally acknowledging GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY, something that a decade ago most people weren’t even aware existed! This is how far we have come.)

Elsewhere, they also concede that anti-racism is what threatens Jews, and Gentile identitarianism is what protects Jews:

Anti-racism serves as a screen for anti-white racism and anti-Jewish racism

On this issue, there should naturally be an alliance between France and Israel; they have common challenges of terrorism and submersion by migration. Such an alliance is also an affront to the global superclass that barely conceals its anti-Zionism.

I never knew I was the “global superclass”, though….. I mean, you know, I thought I was just some random 2D video game fan…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luvw39ppu4c

Anyway:

In addition to closing the borders to mass immigration, there should be re-emigration of non-indigenous populations—on a military, not just economic, basis. France should stop its friendly—not to say complacent and suicidal—policy towards Arab-Muslim nations, and establish a military and economic partnership with Israel. Ideally, the fight for the re-emigration of Palestinian colonizers out of Israeli territory would go hand in hand with the fight for the re-emigration of African and Arab-Muslim colonizers from French territory.

So now we can at last stop debating our enemies over what the current conflict is about or which side of the conflict this or that historical ideology would have taken (because we are now in full agreement on all of this), and instead simply ask every potential participant in the conflict: which side are you on?

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

59 Responses to Our enemies concede that Judaism is rightist

  1. AS says:

    @SotI

    “Malting is no different than killing offsprings of animals??”

    I’m just saying that given a choice between honey and malt under common production methods as known today, I would choose malt. If the Aryan leaders really could extract honey from a beehive without violence while the bees are present (I am willing to leave this possibility open), that would be fine.

    @WE

    “self-evidently, more likely to contain sentient life than plants are.”

    ???

  2. William Eastfield says:

    @AS

    “???”

    Don’t you think it’s more likely for an egg to have sentient life than a plant?

    In any case, my previous points still stand: Egg-eating is unhealthy and will ultimately slow the consumer/everyone else down. Therefore, I recommend that you (and everyone else) abstain from eating eggs, even if they were obtained consensually.

    But again: Is it still fair to take the eggs of chickens who are coming to an Aryan farm for safety, considering how a farm was pretty much their best bet? Would egg-taking be a truly consensual trade if the egg-giver(s) faced death if they do not? Chances were, other Aryan farms were far away (at least for chickens, who are comparatively small to humans, and whom also faced a high risk of death by predation and exposure) from the one they found themselves at.

  3. AS says:

    @WE

    “Don’t you think it’s more likely for an egg to have sentient life than a plant?”

    I have twice invited you to explain why we should think so.

    “Is it still fair to take the eggs of chickens who are coming to an Aryan farm for safety, considering how a farm was pretty much their best bet?”

    The Aryan farm has a duty to welcome them, but the chickens also have a duty to contribute. The question should be: is it fair to those whose labour produces the food for the chickens, the houses which protect them, etc. if the chickens are not required to contribute in return?

    “Would egg-taking be a truly consensual trade if the egg-giver(s) faced death if they do not?”

    But we are not the ones threatening the egg-givers with death. The threat of death comes from the outside predator-prey world beyond Aryan territory. We may certainly wish to expand our territory with a view to one day eliminating the threat altogether, but in that case the chickens have even more of a duty to contribute so that we can expand sooner! All energy we supply to the chickens is energy not being supplied to everyone else who could be converting the next piece of land into part of the farm (and thus refuge for more chickens). Unless the chickens pay taxes, they are holding back how soon we can offer refuge to other chickens! Is this fair to those still waiting outside?

    (I must say, though, this is the type of discussion that I wish were taking place today with regard to human refugees, where all consider it obvious that refugees should be allowed to stay, and are merely checking one another’s ideas to make sure everything is fair. The issue of fairness is rarely even raised these days! This is how identitarianism has poisoned the entire subject.)

  4. Janus says:

    > George Soros’s “open society” is an ideal that owes nothing to Judaism; it owes everything to the Gnostic heresy of Christianity and the cosmopolitanism of Diogenes the Cynic.

    It begs the question: was gnosticism even a heresy in the first place?

    Also, why is Diogenes being hailed as the author of cosmopolitanism by the mainstream narrative and the reactionary Right? Socrates preceded him in this. Diogenes is said to have criticized and systematically opposed Plato, that makes him an enemy in my book. As Nietzsche the philologist points out, Socrates marked the decline of Greece. He asks if Socrates was even Greek. Socrates got along with the sophists and decadents of his time. Schiller, a foremost interpreter of Plato, shared this view. Plato’s indictment of Diogenes as “a Socrates gone mad” speaks volumes.

    >They are finally acknowledging GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY, something that a decade ago most people weren’t even aware existed! This is how far we have come.

    Uncritical embrace of gnosticism as it is known in the mainstream will be the downfall of this movement. Why not follow Marcion’s example and purge it of all things referencing Jewish characters and settings? It apparently grew up on Jewish grounds and is addressed to Jews. It follows that what remains of the ideals have to be extracted from this narrative.

  5. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    #Trump #Reproduction #Humans #Meme

    https://www.minds.com/media/901729641203142656

    :)

  6. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Daniel says:

    https://es.metapedia.org/wiki/Movimiento_Veganista

    Group with views similar to ours.

  7. William Eastfield says:

    @Daniel

    That is a very peculiar find. I haven’t read much of page, but I am already wondering if the founder(s) of that organization were inspired from this very site.

    Even then, I suggest against them using the symbolism they use for obvious reasons.

    @ItIsWhatItIs

    Will you hop back onto Discord? There is something I want to discuss with you.

  8. William Eastfield says:

    @AS

    “(I must say, though, this is the type of discussion that I wish were taking place today with regard to human refugees, where all consider it obvious that refugees should be allowed to stay, and are merely checking one another’s ideas to make sure everything is fair. The issue of fairness is rarely even raised these days! This is how identitarianism has poisoned the entire subject.)”

    On that note, have you received my proposal from Hypnotix? I think that your character, ideological insight and sense of strategy is especially valuable, in this context.

    I assume that you distrust anyone from the Discord server. Nonetheless, you are welcome to communicate with me directly, if you wish. You know my email.

  9. Robert Young says:

    @AS

    ‘I never mentioned Ford.’

    Don’t be disingenuous here, AS. Your previous comment about Kavanaugh implicitly mentioned Dr. Ford. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out.

    ‘Kavanaugh has PROVABLY lied’

    Much like how Hitler lied, according to this site?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>