https://www.amren.com/features/2018/09/anti-racism-the-trojan-horse-for-the-great-replacement/
Some people believe in a Jewish plot to orchestrate the great replacement and promote terrorism. It is worth remembering that cosmopolitanism, which is a Hellenic invention, has no roots in Judaism. It is certainly a fact that cosmopolitanism is now defended by some Jewish intellectual elites, but they are decadents who represent only themselves. They despise the community from which they come, and seem to have little sympathy for the Jews who fall under the blows of Muslims.
Cosmopolitanism runs counter to the sacred texts of Judaism. The civilizational manifestation of the Old Testament, the Talmud, or Kabbalah is not cosmopolitanism, let alone bourgeois materialism. It is the sovereign nation, homogeneous in terms of race, and aristocratic-warlike in terms of values. George Soros’s “open society” is an ideal that owes nothing to Judaism; it owes everything to the Gnostic heresy of Christianity and the cosmopolitanism of Diogenes the Cynic.
Thank you. We told you so. Ten years ago FFS.
(But seriously, GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY. They are finally acknowledging GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY, something that a decade ago most people weren’t even aware existed! This is how far we have come.)
Elsewhere, they also concede that anti-racism is what threatens Jews, and Gentile identitarianism is what protects Jews:
Anti-racism serves as a screen for anti-white racism and anti-Jewish racism
…
On this issue, there should naturally be an alliance between France and Israel; they have common challenges of terrorism and submersion by migration. Such an alliance is also an affront to the global superclass that barely conceals its anti-Zionism.
I never knew I was the “global superclass”, though….. I mean, you know, I thought I was just some random 2D video game fan…..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luvw39ppu4c
Anyway:
In addition to closing the borders to mass immigration, there should be re-emigration of non-indigenous populations—on a military, not just economic, basis. France should stop its friendly—not to say complacent and suicidal—policy towards Arab-Muslim nations, and establish a military and economic partnership with Israel. Ideally, the fight for the re-emigration of Palestinian colonizers out of Israeli territory would go hand in hand with the fight for the re-emigration of African and Arab-Muslim colonizers from French territory.
So now we can at last stop debating our enemies over what the current conflict is about or which side of the conflict this or that historical ideology would have taken (because we are now in full agreement on all of this), and instead simply ask every potential participant in the conflict: which side are you on?
@SotI
“Malting is no different than killing offsprings of animals??”
I’m just saying that given a choice between honey and malt under common production methods as known today, I would choose malt. If the Aryan leaders really could extract honey from a beehive without violence while the bees are present (I am willing to leave this possibility open), that would be fine.
@WE
“self-evidently, more likely to contain sentient life than plants are.”
???
@AS
“???”
Don’t you think it’s more likely for an egg to have sentient life than a plant?
In any case, my previous points still stand: Egg-eating is unhealthy and will ultimately slow the consumer/everyone else down. Therefore, I recommend that you (and everyone else) abstain from eating eggs, even if they were obtained consensually.
But again: Is it still fair to take the eggs of chickens who are coming to an Aryan farm for safety, considering how a farm was pretty much their best bet? Would egg-taking be a truly consensual trade if the egg-giver(s) faced death if they do not? Chances were, other Aryan farms were far away (at least for chickens, who are comparatively small to humans, and whom also faced a high risk of death by predation and exposure) from the one they found themselves at.
@WE
“Don’t you think it’s more likely for an egg to have sentient life than a plant?”
I have twice invited you to explain why we should think so.
“Is it still fair to take the eggs of chickens who are coming to an Aryan farm for safety, considering how a farm was pretty much their best bet?”
The Aryan farm has a duty to welcome them, but the chickens also have a duty to contribute. The question should be: is it fair to those whose labour produces the food for the chickens, the houses which protect them, etc. if the chickens are not required to contribute in return?
“Would egg-taking be a truly consensual trade if the egg-giver(s) faced death if they do not?”
But we are not the ones threatening the egg-givers with death. The threat of death comes from the outside predator-prey world beyond Aryan territory. We may certainly wish to expand our territory with a view to one day eliminating the threat altogether, but in that case the chickens have even more of a duty to contribute so that we can expand sooner! All energy we supply to the chickens is energy not being supplied to everyone else who could be converting the next piece of land into part of the farm (and thus refuge for more chickens). Unless the chickens pay taxes, they are holding back how soon we can offer refuge to other chickens! Is this fair to those still waiting outside?
(I must say, though, this is the type of discussion that I wish were taking place today with regard to human refugees, where all consider it obvious that refugees should be allowed to stay, and are merely checking one another’s ideas to make sure everything is fair. The issue of fairness is rarely even raised these days! This is how identitarianism has poisoned the entire subject.)
> George Soros’s “open society” is an ideal that owes nothing to Judaism; it owes everything to the Gnostic heresy of Christianity and the cosmopolitanism of Diogenes the Cynic.
It begs the question: was gnosticism even a heresy in the first place?
Also, why is Diogenes being hailed as the author of cosmopolitanism by the mainstream narrative and the reactionary Right? Socrates preceded him in this. Diogenes is said to have criticized and systematically opposed Plato, that makes him an enemy in my book. As Nietzsche the philologist points out, Socrates marked the decline of Greece. He asks if Socrates was even Greek. Socrates got along with the sophists and decadents of his time. Schiller, a foremost interpreter of Plato, shared this view. Plato’s indictment of Diogenes as “a Socrates gone mad” speaks volumes.
>They are finally acknowledging GNOSTIC CHRISTIANITY, something that a decade ago most people weren’t even aware existed! This is how far we have come.
Uncritical embrace of gnosticism as it is known in the mainstream will be the downfall of this movement. Why not follow Marcion’s example and purge it of all things referencing Jewish characters and settings? It apparently grew up on Jewish grounds and is addressed to Jews. It follows that what remains of the ideals have to be extracted from this narrative.
#Trump #Reproduction #Humans #Meme
https://www.minds.com/media/901729641203142656
https://es.metapedia.org/wiki/Movimiento_Veganista
Group with views similar to ours.
@Daniel
That is a very peculiar find. I haven’t read much of page, but I am already wondering if the founder(s) of that organization were inspired from this very site.
Even then, I suggest against them using the symbolism they use for obvious reasons.
@ItIsWhatItIs
Will you hop back onto Discord? There is something I want to discuss with you.
@AS
“(I must say, though, this is the type of discussion that I wish were taking place today with regard to human refugees, where all consider it obvious that refugees should be allowed to stay, and are merely checking one another’s ideas to make sure everything is fair. The issue of fairness is rarely even raised these days! This is how identitarianism has poisoned the entire subject.)”
On that note, have you received my proposal from Hypnotix? I think that your character, ideological insight and sense of strategy is especially valuable, in this context.
I assume that you distrust anyone from the Discord server. Nonetheless, you are welcome to communicate with me directly, if you wish. You know my email.
@AS
‘I never mentioned Ford.’
Don’t be disingenuous here, AS. Your previous comment about Kavanaugh implicitly mentioned Dr. Ford. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out.
‘Kavanaugh has PROVABLY lied’
Much like how Hitler lied, according to this site?
The simple fundamental issue with the philosophy of this network is how its creator and admin do not draw the morally reprehensible distinction between usurious tribalism (parasitism/slavery) and non-usurious groupings (whether ethnocentric by choice or not).
Instead, they draw the contradistinction between all forms of ethno-grouping – which are negatively stigmatized simply as “tribalism”, and “non-tribalism” or “folkism”, the latter stating there can be no phenotypical preference – lest one would then be a “tribalist”.
I imagine is too late now, and that perhaps this site is a controlled op (perhaps always has been), however want to give the benefit of the doubt and strongly suggest the admin consider revising this fallacy. Nativity (blood and soil) was a huge pillar of NS Germany and all autarkic, sovereign lifestyles during and prior to Hitler’s reign, so it is alarming you promote cosmopolitanism. When you could be making nativity appear welcoming, and presenting information in a down to earth, wholesome way, you instead pander to the divisive parts of the ‘false left’ that focus on identity politics. The same angle as the mainstream media, just in a militant way that blames and associates jews with ‘the right’.
If anything this tactic ironically makes the ‘left’ you pander to look worse via association. The ‘left’ HATES all things critical of Jewry, as well as all things praising of Hitler. It is one thing to brand Jewry rightfully as THE white supremacist ruling class, lead of the ‘white male patriarchy’, and Judaism as classically ‘right wing’ by default. However again – going back to those contradistinctions between what is morally reprehensible and what is not – it isn’t ethnocentrism itself that earmarks what makes this the problem; it’s the usurious, exploitative principles of “my people is born to enslave/rule over others” that is the inherent issue.
I love my Galician people. My body is laced with ancient, dark haired Celtic blood, and I love the land and culture where most of us reside today. It is only when a people is comfortable in their own skin, and have their own land, customs, strength, and so forth, that there is harmony and true respect for one another.
IMO this site either lost this sentiment along the way, or has long since been subverted by subverters who are not properly representing the swastika or even the fallen Axis power and their volunteers, for that matter.
{Note: Jews never had their own nation until modern day Israel because they were missing the sovereign elements necessary to live autonomously (without slaves). Tech advancement gave them the money power and a way to have many slaves many miles away, however this obviously does not mirror an actual autonomous people’s state (whether with ethnocentric qualities or not).}
“The simple fundamental issue (…) strongly suggest the admin consider revising this fallacy (…) When you could be making nativity appear welcoming.”
Sure, just as we could consider making Israel appear welcoming, or just as we could consider promoting hatred of refugees, or whatever else you can imagine. But we won’t, because we’re not idiots.
Haven’t you noticed how you just implied there was something wrong with what we say without providing arguments to explain why? It’s always the same deal with people like you.
“you instead pander to the divisive parts of the ‘false left’ that focus on identity politics”
We want to end identities. If anything, it’s WNs who should pander to identity politics.
“The ‘left’ HATES all things critical of Jewry, as well as all things praising of Hitler.”
Obviously. But it will change, that’s why we’re here.
“It is one thing to brand Jewry rightfully as THE white supremacist ruling class, lead of the ‘white male patriarchy’, and Judaism as classically ‘right wing’ by default. However again – going back to those contradistinctions between what is morally reprehensible and what is not – it isn’t ethnocentrism itself that earmarks what makes this the problem; it’s the usurious, exploitative principles of “my people is born to enslave/rule over others” that is the inherent issue.”
And the inherent issue is inherent to tribalism. You can’t escape it, because tribalism is part of a certain mindset which, by its nature, encompasses the very principles you consider to be the inherent issue. The example most often given here is of Spain. Being ethnically homogenous and “wholesome” did not prevent them from shoving themselves into ships bound for the New World. And we all know what happened next. This idea that some tribalists have, that we should all live peacefully within our ethnicities, is a fantasy. It will never be possible if you have people with the mindset I talked about, and it will never be necessary if you don’t.
“I love my Galician people. My body is laced with ancient, dark haired Celtic blood”
I’m going to vomit.
“It is only when a people is comfortable in their own skin, and have their own land, customs, strength, and so forth, that there is harmony and true respect for one another.”
As verified by Israel and how they treat Palestinians.
Oh wait…
“IMO this site either lost this sentiment along the way”
I know I have, thank God.
@AE:
Even with the best of intentions all tribalism is dishonest because one group cannot refrain from doing harm to another group infinitely on a FINITE planet. Therefore, the idea of “we won’t harm other groups” is a logical fallacy.
TRIBALISM IS ALSO ANTITHETICAL TO NATIONALISM AND THE NEOLITHIC REVOLUTION!
“We have a finite environment—the planet. Anyone who thinks that you can have infinite growth in a finite environment is either a madman or an economist.” – David Attenborough
“The closed economy of the future might similarly be called the ‘spaceman’ (Cosmic?) economy, in which the earth has become a single spaceship, without unlimited reservoirs of anything, either for extraction or for pollution, and in which, therefore, man must find his place in a cyclical ecological system.” – Kenneth Boulding, 1966
Aryanists are attempting to lay the ground work for a new race of humans, a cosmic race. This concept seems to bounce right off of most people’s heads apparently?
“Fascism itself was not National Socialism, contrarily to what so many haters of both seem to think. It was a political — and economical — system; not a more-than-political creed; and it inspired a Movement of practical and immediate — of time-bound — significance, not one of cosmic scope.” – Savitri Devi
Any political ideology that does not incorporate these facts is ignoble, illogical, and extremely shortsighted. A complete waste of time. As far as I can tell only Aryan National Socialism does so….
@Erich
You wrote: “I am not interested in food nutrition” And then you wrote: “Veganism is not harmful to health at any stage of life not even childhood. That is absolutely false”
If you are not interested in food nutrition, how are you in a position to say anything about veganism’s harmfulness in childhood?
I AM interested in nutrition and have studied it for at least 20 years now (profesionally). And within that period I have raised two children, so been very motivated to figure out what’s best for their developing brains. Also, I’ve been a thinking type all my life, so have also been very motivated to figure out what is best for MY brain (and so brains in general).
For me health comes first. Ethics second. That is the natural order of things. Ethics and ideologies are the playthings of human beings, particularly humans living in a technological society like ours. In this artificial environment (revolving around diesel-powered farming and diesel-powered transportation), people can choose to become vegan. Many do, especially in metropolitan areas. It’s hip. But vegans will die off as soon as the next Ice Age starts.
Nourishment is much more primal than ethics and ideologies. And so I will not sacrifice the health of myself, my children or my race for the sake of vegan ideals or ethics.
“If you are traditionalist”
I am not. Tradition too is of secondary importance to the health of myself and my race. And so I’m opposed to fireworks, for example, even though it’s become a European tradition to light them at new years eve. I’m not very fond of traditions involving binge drinking either.
*****
@ItIsWhatItIs
You asked: “A bit off topic, but out of curiosity, what are you going to do to make ‘ethnic’ Germans want to reproduce again? … Are you going to try and force ‘ethnic’ Germans to reproduce somehow?”
First of all, I do not think the current economy can or should be saved. It will need a radical reboot. I do not favor an increase of the population just to keep the factories and welfare system going.
Also, I do not believe a National-Socialist revolution will be possible in Europe until AFTER the inevitable collapse of the current order (with its EU bureaucracy, systematic Holocaust indoctrination etc.). There will most likely be an extremely chaotic and violent phase between the collapse of the EU and the eventual formation of the Fourth Reich. It could well take several decades.
This is why I’m not actively involved with any of the political parties and movements that are arising in Europe right now. I expect and hope for a near-total collapse, whereas these guys are all hoping that a few reforms will fix things and they all get to keep their modern comforts.
So aside from encouraging individual German boys and girls to stop feeling guilty over “their” National-Socialist past, and not feel ashamed about having blonde, blue-eyed children themselves, I do not have any suggestions. We’ll have to see by the time we (those who survive the coming collapse) actually attain a position in which we can implement government programs. At that time, perhaps, measures similar to the Lebensborn program can be introduced. We’ll have to see.
“Do you really believe the modern West would be as “successful” as it is in the global Judeo-Capitalist system if it had not plundered the rest of the non-Western world?”
Maybe not AS succesful, but still, relatively succesful because ingenuity tends to result in wealth, even without plundering anyone. If your group contains people with a talent for engineering, your society is going to have things like irrigation, wells, dykes, canals, ships, fortresses, tempels, iron tools and so on. The majority of Dutch wealth resulted from fishing, farming and trade within Europe itself. The colonial era gave their wealth a boost, but it never became the major source of income.
And regarding that word, “plundered”, just look which peoples have been most succesful in that activity: Mongoloids and Caucasoids. It’s been these races (which include the Turks, the Arabs and so on) which domesticated horses, invented chariots, built boats, mapped the stars and so on.
That they plundered succesfully (of which much was actually TRADE), does not mean their success is solely due to taking from others. These were incredibly inventive people. Currently the greatest world powers are those with a population whose average IQ is in the range of 100-105. Arabs cannot compete anymore (IQ around 85) and neither can the Turks (90). Perhaps their IQ could be raised again by outlawing cousin marriage (as has been the the case in Europe for many centuries) and implementing a strict eugenics program for a couple of generations, but being firmly in the grip of Islamic traditionalism (including its universalism), that is unlikely going to happen.
All these human groups are going to weaken and eventually perish: vegans, Muslims and those who intermarry with Negroids.
Only those groups which embrace health, intelligence and eugenics will be part of the next phase of human civilization.
@ID
‘All these human groups are going to weaken and eventually perish: vegans’
Well, you’re anti-Hitler.
@ItIsWhatItIs
“Even with the best of intentions all tribalism is dishonest because one group cannot refrain from doing harm to another group infinitely on a FINITE planet. Therefore, the idea of “we won’t harm other groups” is a logical fallacy.”
I think to pair homogeneity with a negative take on tribalism is wrong, because there can be peaceable homogeneous groups of the land who are biologically attune with their environment, and mixed societies that are disharmonious and act violently. It’s unjust to make sweeping judgments based sheerly on whether a person or group is or isn’t willing to intermix with foreign elements, and particularly unjust if a group is well established on the soil they inhabit, and are homogeneous due to remaining as themselves among themselves.
If there were presently a homogeneous noble race of Aryans, by the logic of this network they’d be “evil, dishonest tribalists” for choosing not to take on foreign elements.
I get that we live in world of travel and intermixing, particularly in modern societies, and that a criteria for ‘nobility’ is good, as well as economic design that exalts non-deceptive, noble traits. It’s important though to recognize how biological similarities still have attraction, and that this often results in people of similar ethnicity forming closer bonds and procreating more often with each other. It isn’t racism, racial supremacy, or selfishness, which is more like if an ethnic hotchpotch of people pretending to be a homogeneous “white race” say that entire continents their ancestors colonized belong to them. No man or woman grounded in their cultural roots (i.e. nobody from non-colonist stock) is so deluded to have such desires, because they’re secure within themselves, thus not fearful of anybody “stealing” their womenfolk or corrupting them. People more susceptible to internal corruption from external elements have become angry goyim slaves, while my people have mostly remained themselves and their romanticist, beach loving, musical culture intact – thus by my assessment ought to be romanticized and extolled as the leaders of the new age amid the fallout of the Anglo and Babylonian descendant rulership.
@Ivar. A quick rebuttal to the points that stick out to me, regarding veganism and the apparent ‘next iceage’… You can’t predict there will be another ice age, for one, and regarding veganism, for vegans it’s about reducing the suffering of animals insomuch as we can control. There is no need anywhere there is arable soil to consume animals or animal products, and in places there is a preponderance of this there is terrible health. In industrial countries some Europoid people have manufactured, there is a perversion of natural sources into mass produced things we don’t require to be sold back to the public in an altered form. Demographics where machine tech is a vocal point, there is machine dependency, slavery to machines, and physical atrophy (weakening) of populations. There is mass destruction of wildlife, an imbalance of harmony, a disconnect from the people and their environment, and a loss of creativity and culture. The Westerners who invented machines did so to supplant human and animal slaves; in other words this sort of technical advancement was sprung from internal weakness sprung from slave / slaver mindedness and quantitative thinking. It is stupidly ironic that so many Western nationalists use engineering advancement and IQ tests around vocational eduction around making money for jewish bankers, as a claim to an apparent ‘superiority’. A self defeating people that aggrandize precisely the innovations and “economic” systems that have been serving the demise of the earth, animals and themselves, simply because prominent jews and masons have inculcated in msm and school that what is in fact signs of decadence and senility are ‘advancements’ of the ’1st world’.
Regarding this article and occupied Palestine, lest we forget jews have not really had a homeland, as is the nature of not establishing an economy with honest effort – thus having to move from place to place after being found out (or laying low as a minority like in Iran). Their claim to Palestine is based on the historical inaccuracy that jews were Israelites who occupied and were removed from that space hundreds of years ago. Jews from what I’ve researched were of ‘Judah’, which was south of ancient Israel, and were banished from the land by Israelites. If I had to make an educated guess, likely their exploitative ways were found out and like many times afterward they were exiled, that time by way of Aramaic semites (the blood whence Christ was born).
In other words, the modern “Israelis” are frauds using botched historical ‘lessons’ to justify their mass invasion and usurping of the native people of Palestine, who no doubt have more Israelite semitic blood than the settlers.
“Israel” (i.e. occupied Palestine) is a welfare state, founded by colonial invasion, and expanding hub for international war and crime. To compare it to France in the way this article does is perhaps unintentionally misleading. The native French are more similar in circumstance to the native Palestinians, insofar as both have taken on foreign elements unfavorable to their way of life, obviously the Palestinians more so than the French.
I don’t know the situation intimately or would comment more in depth, however am aware that some Arabs are out for colonialism, particularly of the Wahhabi variety, and that their methods are similar to colonist jews (e.g. Saudi Arabia and mass murder of Yemenis, as well as Western/Israel hired Saudi terror proxy groups used for regional terror and destabilization, e.g. ISIS).
Prominent jews utilize certain Westerners and Arabs in ways of terrorism and war in their establishing of a world where the only genetic elements that remain are slavish, dishonorable, egotistical and nomadic, i.e. at the cost of wholesome, grounded, honorable, loyal, genetic elements. The replacement of real humans with ‘processed people’ i.e. ‘goyim’ who serve the machines that serve the ruling kabal, so there is always a ‘safe’ degree of separation from “the mob”, who they indeed prefer is bigoted, sexist, mean and non-thinking. Such plans, although appearing successful on the surface, run contradictory however to Life and Alaha (Yahweh is false), and there will only be so much going in the wrong way before there is complete disillusionment and the right way becomes obvious. My optimistic view, anyway. Merry Christmas!