Here is a good example of what high-end
gender-obsessed rightist thought looks like in 2019:
Among the different varieties of nationalism that have emerged in the world, since the French Revolution, most are very largely gynecocratic: an eminent example is the nationalism of 1789, which abolished rank inequalities (in favor of a motherly and egalitarian conception of the nation), but also Hitlerian nationalism or Soviet nationalism. This led Julius Evola to point out that, “The modern world shows a return of the themes that were proper to the ancient Southern gynecocratic civilizations;” and that, “Socialism and communism” ultimately prove “materialized and technological revivals of the ancient telluric, Southern principle of equality and promiscuity of all beings in Mother Earth.”
Obviously I disagree with their choice of intentional perjoratives to describe Hitlerism, such as “egalitarian” or “gynecocratic”(????), but the main point is that they are finally being forced to admit that Hitlerism is nothing like what they as recently as a decade ago used to presume it was (ie. neo-Nazism), but rather what we have been adamantly and ceaselessly saying – from the very beginning of our activism – it actually was (ie. authentic National Socialism). Not “egalitarian” (in the sense of ignoring quality), of course, but simply anti-racist. Nor “gynecocratic”, but simply anti-sexist.
I do broadly agree with two of Evola’s adjectives “telluric” and “Southern” to describe authentic National Socialism, though of course Evola had little in-depth grasp of the characteristics of what he has accurately labelled. Here are some quotes reflecting Hitler’s essentially Mediterranean blood memory (consistent with the location of Asgard in our Aryan Diffusion theory):
“The southern peoples are not acquainted either with a meat diet or with cooking. I lived marvellously in Italy. I don’t know any country that enlivens one more.” – Adolf Hitler
“Once when I was travelling to Florence, I thought, as I passed through it, what a paradise this land of southern France is ! But when I reached Italy—then I realised what a paradise on earth can really be!” – Adolf Hitler
“We know to-day why our ancestors were not attracted to the East, but rather to the South. Because all the regions lying east of the Elbe were like what Russia is for us to-day. The Romans detested crossing the Alps. The Germanic peoples, on the other hand, were very fond of crossing them—but in the opposite direction. … For any Roman, the fact of being sent to Germania was regarded as a punishment—rather like what it used to mean to us to be sent to Posen. You can imagine those rainy, grey regions, transformed into quagmires as far as eye could see. The megalithic monuments were certainly not places of worship, but rather places of refuge for people fleeing from the advance of the mud. The countryside was cold, damp, dreary.” – Adolf Hitler
Bonus music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqIIW7nxBgc
(It was Himmler who was the Nordicist, and this is what Hitler once said to him:
“You’ll understand, Himmler, that if I want to establish a genuine civilisation to the North and East, I’ll have to make use of men from the South. If I were to take official architects of the Prussian Government to beautify Berlin, for example, I’d do better to abandon the project!” – Adolf Hitler)
As for “telluric” (a.k.a. Aryan):
“The preying type of man is always envious, always seeking something fresh to possess. … The solid man of the soil is absolutely modest in his ideas. He wants no more than he can get by his work.” – Gottfried Feder
“It is only in the pictures of the Court artists that one sees peasants gazing at the stars in heaven. The real peasant keeps his eye firmly on the land, and he lives by the plough.” – Adolf Hitler
These two quotes (Feder’s more so) almost perfectly predict our enemies’ explicitly self-declared values:
an archeofuturist Catholicism would consist in reconciling domestic and economic individualism with these two Indo-European archaisms that are permanent innovation and the aristocratic-warlike ethos.
And, best of all, our enemies finally agree with us on the true origin of these values:
Among the great historical religions of the West, neither the sacerdotal Judaism of the Old Testament nor Talmudic Judaism nor Greco-Roman paganism nor Catholicism nor Calvinism are gynecocracies. … Catholicism fits with its Judaic parent but also its Calvinist offspring; Greco-Roman paganism proves equally virile: inegalitarian, heroic, favorable to progress and to the exploitation of nature. However, Catholicism currently finds itself in a crisis situation, insofar as it has become gynecocratic and has disowned its own Indo-European character: a degradation triggered with the Counter-Reformation and accelerated with Vatican II.
Of course our enemies continue to get wrong what “Aryan” means:
Catholicism is a virile and Aryan [<<<Wrong! - AS] religion that venerates the figure of the Father; it affirms inequality in all respects, endorses the heroic and warlike virtues, advocates economic, cognitive, artistic, and technological progress.
this ethos is properly Indo-European and also permeates the Old Testament, the Talmud, or Kabbalah (whose Indo-European origin is debatable, but which undoubtedly share the aristocratic-warlike ethos with Aryan [<<<Wrong! - AS] peoples and were therefore incorporated within the Aryan [<<<Wrong! - AS] Weltanschauung).
but as long as we keep beating them over the head with the etymology from which “Aryan” derives, they will eventually have no choice but to admit that it is those whom they call the “tellurics” (ie. Neolithic farmers) who are the true Aryans, not their precious steppe subhumans (a.k.a. Turanians, ancestors of Jews, hence the Old Testament indeed being an expression of Turanism). See also:
All in all, I am always happy to achieve academic agreement with our enemies, even though we remain ideologically opposed, because academic agreement with our ideological opponents improves clarity over what the opposition between us is about. Here are my favourite lines from the rest of the enemy article:
It is hardly surprising that Trump, Orbán, and Netanyahu, but also Putin, are thought of as the chosen of Providence to defend the Christian Whites against the machinations of what the Roman Church has become!
Let us add that Calvinism, in its doctrinal foundations, refuses to render any worship to the Virgin Mary, which seems to prevent all the better a gynecocratic drift on its part. It is not fortuitous that the two great leaders of the resistance of the peoples to cosmopolitanism, namely Donald Trump and Victor Orbán, are Calvinist.
You are welcome to have Trump, Orban, Netanyahu and Putin. Thank you for ceasing to claim Hitler. (To the cynics from a decade ago, I told you I would be bringing home the swastika flag. It was inevitable ever since archaeological evidence confirmed the swastika to belong to the Neolithic farmers, not to the steppe subhumans.)
The bad conscience towards deported Jews, which facilitated the establishment of anti-racism (and therefore, the implementation of the great replacement), cannot hide the vigor of the hate and jealousy that the chosen people continues to undergo: that is witnessed by the persecutions—coming from the UN—that the Israeli nation must endure day after day, and by the slanders that the Western press spreads to skew the public opinion in favor of Palestinians. It is also witnessed by the hypocrisy of the anti-racist jurisdiction, which claims to fight against anti-Jewish racism, but systematically or almost systematically spares and protects the Muslims who hold negationist speeches or commit anti-Semitic attacks. Among European-Caucasoids, the vivacity of hateful feelings and behaviors towards the Jewish ethnicity echoes the de-judaization of the contemporary (pseudo-) Catholicism, a de-judaization that we will see is culminating into the ecologism of Pope Francis
Culminating? No, what you are seeing is just the prelude. De-Judaization will culminate in the revival of Gnostic Christianity. Watch us.
We have mentioned, above, this decisive aspect of the Indo-European tradition that is permanent innovation: innovation in the arts and techniques, but also in the knowledge of the world and the economy. “The Indo-European tradition of permanent innovation,” which is another formula that we owe to Guillaume Faye, culminates into the Promethean ideal of Greco-Roman paganism: the figure of Prometheus to the extent that it symbolizes the encouragement to technological progress and to the exploitation of nature. However, technological progress is here perceived as a transgression of the order desired by the gods: it means an infringement of the divine will, which is likely to arouse their wrath. The Indo-European ethos of permanent innovation also culminates into the divine anthropology of the Old Testament, by which is to be understood the Hebraic conception of man as made in the image of God, and as mandated to complete and crown the creative gesture of the divine.
Greco-Roman paganism encourages innovation and industry, but represents them to itself as a transgression of the divine will: in other words, an infringement of the order desired by the gods. For its part, Judaism conceives of industry and innovation as the object of the divine will; it sees them simultaneously as the manifestation of the divine nature of the human being and as the fulfillment of the order desired by God. The ecologism of Pope Francis does not only break with the Indo-European tradition of permanent innovation; it amounts to a de-judaization of the contemporary Catholic Church, a de-judaization that finds its culmination in the replacement of the biblical call to subjugate nature with the ecological call to dismantle modern industry. An archeofuturist Catholicism would remedy such a de-judaization by brandishing the Old Testament’s divine anthropology in front of the ecologism that has tacitly supplanted it (and which is nothing but an aspect of the gynecocracy that has replaced Catholicism itself within the Church).
It should also be specified that the Italian Renaissance did not only see flourishing the aristocratic-warlike ethos—in its properly Pagan and Greco-Roman form—in the persons of the Borgia or the Medici, but also Jewish esotericism in philosophy and the arts; and that the divine anthropology of the Old Testament inspired the shattering progresses of the Italian Renaissance in art, finance, technology, logico-experimental knowledge, and occultism.
Very good; we have come to agree quite closely indeed on what Western civilization is. We only disagree on whether or not it should die.
Today, facing the Islamic barbarian hordes invading the old continent, it is time for us, more than ever before, to return to Julius II, the Pope of archeofuturism, who reaffirmed the aristocratic-warlike ethos of Pagan Rome, but also the divine anthropology of the Old Testament by making himself the protector of the arts; and besides, by letting Michelangelo paint the Genesis and defend Jews in the decoration of the Sistine Chapel.
See you on the battlefield.
Now only the low-end rightists remain who still think Hitler was one of them, and even they are being exposed as closet fans of Judaism: