Make Israel Greater Again?

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/11/eric-margolis/the-us-gives-israel-a-green-light-for-expansion/

Hardly anyone noticed.  The Trump administration quietly changed America’s long-held position on Syria’s strategic Golan Heights while attention was focused on the raucous political carnival in Washington.  Though barely noticed, the policy change had enormous importance and will lead the United States into a lot of future Mideast misery.

Israel seized Golan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War and annexed the plateau in 1981. Almost all of Golan’s Arab population was driven out by the Israelis.   The UN and US demanded that Israel return Golan to its rightful owner, Syria.  After 1981, Israel moved over 20,000 settlers onto Golan to cement its control of the strategic heights and its water sources.

Since 1973, America’s policy has been to demand Israel relinquish Golan while quietly allowing US tax deductible funds to expand Jewish settlements on the plateau. Israel even reportedly offered to return Golan in exchange for a peace deal with Syria, but the secret terms of the deal were too onerous for Damascus.

The Trump administration abruptly changed US Mideast policy.  First, it announced the US Embassy would move from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, meaning that it rejected the idea of a Palestinian state with its capital in the old city of Jerusalem.  Now, the White House has quietly accepted permanent Israeli control of Golan, though it violates international law and past US policy.

what the change in US Golan policy means is that Trump & Co are giving a green light to further Israeli territorial expansion.

This link was previously posted several times in comments:

https://brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/

Meanwhile:

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/woman-says-wants-whole-freaking-nation-white-racist-rant-caught-video-202917828.html

In the video, the woman can be heard saying that she wants “the whole freaking nation to be white.” When Bermudez answered how that won’t happen, the woman responded “it will. You will be wiped out.”

P.S.:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-says-troops-will-use-lethal-force-border-if-they-n939321

President Donald Trump said Thursday that U.S. troops he dispatched to the nation’s border will use lethal force to stop migrants attempting to enter the country “if they have to.”Earlier this week, Trump authorized the military to use its rules of engagement, rather than those of domestic law enforcement agencies, at the border.

Today’s homework: join the dots.

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Make Israel Greater Again?

  1. Robert Young says:

    1. It’s pretty hard to take this site seriously as anti-Zionist site, considering the politicians and general influencers that it has lobbied for and against. For one thing, that kind of lobbying that thisbsite has done makes its stance against Putin’s Russia (which has been accused of enabling Israel) inconsistent.

    2. Americans having power and influence through suffrage is problematic, regardless of the demographic of Americans. But this site is so far deep in its own ideology (which consists of converting liberals into aryanists in a nonsensical manner) that it can’t even directly address that problem.

    3. Adolf Hitler, G. Lincoln Rockwell, Malcolm X, and the BLM-movement have/had plenty of members who are ethnocentric, and this site remains inconsistent on how all of that kind of behavior should be understood, and dealt with. Such inconsistencies hurts sincere anti-Zionist movements.

    4. Donald Trump’s horrible immigration-policies could have been avoided if Barack Obama and the Clinton’s (Bill and Hillary, specifically) were ostracized for their own horrible immigration-policies when they were in power. Instead, we have those three individuals free from a lot of forms of effective ostracism, which enables Trump (who’s been heavily enabled by the Clinton’s throughout the years) and his general policies; and this site did nothing to explicitly and practically attack any of that (through non-verbal and even verbal means) when Obama and any one of the Clinton’s were formally part of the executive branch of America’s federal government; and such a lack of an attack has been even acknowledged by this site. This site ultimately just uses immigrants for inequitable and impractical purposes, and it’s absolutely rage-inducing, much like Hillary’s own recent call for immigration-restrictions in Europe to destabilize ‘right-winged’ backlash through so-called ‘populism’ (which this site did not bother to even explicitly acknowledge in this blog-post).

    5. This site needs to try to actually criticize JFK. He was tool for Russia (just like Trump is currently); exploited the civil rights movement like the liberal fox that he was; and had his younger brother (RFK) in his cabinet, who was major Zionist himself and rightfully got killed by an apparent anti-Zionist. JFK also even praised the immigration-quota system that America had in the past, and the kind of system that Russia currently has to an equal extent; and let us also not forget that just because a person praises Hitler’s style of leadership, it doesn’t automatically mean that said person is a noble person.

    6. This site, for the sake of consistency and sincerity, needs to explicitly acknowledge the fact that Hitler preferred Stalin over FDR, even with Stalin’s terroristic nature.

  2. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    *Sorry for the multiple corrections admin. :D

    I understand you were addressing AS, but some thoughts I had after passing-by I thought I should point out.

    “2. Americans having power and influence through suffrage is problematic, regardless of the demographic of Americans. But this site is so far deep in its own ideology (which consists of converting liberals into aryanists in a nonsensical manner) that it can’t even directly address that problem.”

    “Americans” Ordinary people who do not have the time, genetics, or aptitude, for the political affairs of a state, should not have power and influence through “suffrage” because it is problematic, “regardless” especially because of the demographics of “Americans” people in any given nation. “But this site is so far deep in its own ideology (which consists of converting liberals” Any person so inclined—especially those that are already leftist anywhere in the world—into aryanists….

    The Aryanism ideology clearly states that the number one problem on this planet has always been population and demographics.

    “Reproduction – not economy, not environment, not even Zionism – is the single biggest problem in the world.”
    http://aryanism.net/politics/population-and-demographics/

    That is my take on the Aryanist ideology so far anyway. You clearly have NOT read the site, CANNOT comprehend what you read, are a fool, a useful idiot, a bad troll; or a combination of all five? Regardless, if the state does not have control over reproduction, then it will never be able stop spitting out people like you. Here I definitely agree with the Aryanism ideology myself. I see this as an obvious truth actually. Common sense even….

    I don’t blame anyone from this site for not responding because I too am getting tired of dumb-fucks who can’t read. And if anything I thought I would take this opportunity for propagandist purposes, since no one else wants to respond to any of your mindless drivel it would appear.

  3. Robert Young says:

    @IIWII

    I’m not necessarily looking for a response, you moron. I’m just hoping that reasonable people (including visitors of this site) are repelled by this site when they see my comments.

    Also, I’m in favor of quality people having power and influence, but Americans are not quality people; and any quality person in America is not even truly an America, and should be focused on compromising its political and social existence (as many Muslims have said before me).

    If you also think any American is a quality person, then you really have no respect for Hitler, who wished for America to be totally compromised (as he literally declared war against the nation). But you’re too caught up in this site’s bizarre Americanophilia ideals to realize anything rational, more so than Manuel and Edward.

    PS,

    The fact that you triple-posted is more pathetic than Lucius Rhine himself.

  4. Robert Young says:

    @IIWII

    Even the reliance of so-called ‘leftists’ of America is nonsensical, considering the fact that they can’t even come to an agreement on Russia alone. They are an inconsistent group of people. Ideals don’t win wars; realistic approaches do.

  5. Robert Young says:

    As the good people of the Muslim world would say, ‘Death to America!’ Anyone who engages in the enablement of America’s sovereignty (left or right) deserves total ostracism.

  6. Philistine says:

    @Robert Young

    “I’m not necessarily looking for a response, you moron. I’m just hoping that reasonable people (including visitors of this site) are repelled by this site when they see my comments.”

    Let me translate: “I’m not necessarily looking for a response proving that I’m a moron. I’m just hoping that gullible people (including visitors of this site) are misled by the crap I say in my comments.”

    “It’s pretty hard to take this site seriously as anti-Zionist site, considering the politicians and general influencers that it has lobbied for and against. For one thing, that kind of lobbying that thisbsite has done makes its stance against Putin’s Russia (which has been accused of enabling Israel) inconsistent.”

    https://www.dicio.com.br/desconversar/

    “Americans having power and influence through suffrage is problematic”

    ANYONE having power and influence through suffrage is problematic. Go read: http://aryanism.net/politics/government/

    “But this site is so far deep in its own ideology (which consists of converting liberals into aryanists in a nonsensical manner)”

    It’s astonishing to me how you, knowing nothing about this ideology, want to take conclusions on what it consists of, let alone how nonsensical it is. But let’s be honest: if this [b]was[/b] all nonsense, it surprises me even more how you would dedicate so much of your time posting here. Isn’t that “pathetic,” to use your terms?

    “that it can’t even directly address that problem.”

    It’s unequivocal, we DIRECTLY oppose democracy. This is why you’ve been accused of being a moron. Go read: http://aryanism.net/politics/government/

    “Adolf Hitler, G. Lincoln Rockwell, Malcolm X, and the BLM-movement have/had plenty of members who are ethnocentric, and this site remains inconsistent on how all of that kind of behavior should be understood, and dealt with.”

    Our motto is “Unity through Nobility,” not “Unity through Ethnicity.” You’ve read so little of this site that you didn’t even notice the motto everywhere. So go read: http://aryanism.net/philosophy/what-is-nobility/unity-through-nobility/

    “Donald Trump’s horrible immigration-policies could have been avoided if”

    If he was not elected.

    “Barack Obama and the Clinton’s (Bill and Hillary, specifically) were ostracized for their own horrible immigration-policies when they were in power.”

    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/23/trump-obama-administration-separate-families-immigration/728060002/

    “The Obama administration faced a surge of unaccompanied children from Central America trying to cross the border in 2014. Cecilia Muñoz, director of the Obama administration’s Domestic Policy Council, told the New York Times this month that a multi-agency team was considering “every possible idea” at the time, including separating families. “I do remember looking at each other like, ‘We’re not going to do this, are we?’ We spent five minutes thinking it through and concluded that it was a bad idea,” the Times quoted Muñoz saying. [b]‘The morality of it was clear — that’s not who we are.’[/b]”

    “This site ultimately just uses immigrants for inequitable and impractical purposes,”

    This site defends an individual’s freedom to choose where he wants to live.

    “much like Hillary’s own recent call for immigration-restrictions in Europe to destabilize ‘right-winged’ backlash through so-called ‘populism’ (which this site did not bother to even explicitly acknowledge in this blog-post).”

    This blog-post concerns Trump’s administration and its concessions and similarities to Israel (though I’m not surprised you didn’t understand). Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with this. Relevant link: https://www.dicio.com.br/desconversar/

    “This site needs to try to actually criticize JFK (…) needs to explicitly acknowledge the fact that Hitler preferred Stalin over FDR, even with Stalin’s terroristic nature.”

    The blog is for the examination of [b]current and relevant issues[/b].
    This post draws parallels between Trump’s and Israel’s crimes. It is useful. A post saying “Yes, we explicitly acknowledge that, nearly 100 years ago, Hitler liked Stalin over Roosevelt” is not useful. You know what pointing this out is? It is “absolutely rage-inducing.” Relevant link: https://www.dicio.com.br/desconversar/

  7. Robert Young says:

    @Philistine

    1. Call me a moron and pathetic all you want; I don’t care, as long as reasonable people are turned away from this site. You engaging with me will hopefully turn away even more reasonable people, which is good. People need to be influenced by proper establishments, not by garbage they see on the internet.

    2. This site celebrates people voting (for stuff that this site wants), and ignores the fact that Americans (regardless of their status) are too dangerous and/or stupid for ANYTHING, which Hitler himself acknowledged. I, on the other hand, have never even supported democracy on this site, and I oppose it.

    3. The fact that Trump was even elected (which is a horrible reality that I’ve never even denied, even though you falsely imply that I do) was caused by people like you practically ignoring abuses committed by the Clinton’s and Obama; and Trump and his base literally feeds off from such terrible hypocrisy. Even this site has acknowledged that it should’ve done more to address Obama’s policies in a way that could’ve harmed Trump’s attempt to attain political power, but this site still does nothing to hold Obama and the Clinton’s practically accountable for their crimes against honest immigrants. This site truly does not care about anything good.

    4. This site doesn’t care about honest immigrants (the ones that truly oppose America and other terrible establishments) in any sincere manner. Stop lying. It did nothing to censure the Obama Administration for using weapons against immigrants (of various statuses).

    5. The fact that this site (the blog and main site) can’t acknowledge Hitler’s own preferrance for FDR over Stalin while still assessing Russia and its history shows how insincere this site is; and its whole stance on Russia still remains inconsistent, which Putin probably benefits from. This site even has the nerve to engage in americanophilia, which leaves poor Muslims suffering from America’s tyranny in a terrible state.

    6. Promote your idealisms all you want, but bullets don’t care for idealisms, which this site doesn’t understand, or cares about. Even Lucius (who is the most pathetic person on this site) understood that this site’s calls for physical violence is unrealistic.

  8. Robert Young says:

    @Philistine (a supporter of Trump and Putin)

    7. This site has done nothing to sincere and practical to diminish ethnocentrism, especially the kind that exists in America. This site enables Trump and his base because they can easily point out to its insincere and inconsistent nature, and work from there to gain even more power and influence. Keep repeating your statements that people just don’t understand this site’s ideology though. That’ll go very well in the long run.

    8. You are the kind of person that complains about ‘whataboutism’, but uses it yourself when it benefits you. Such inconsistencies doesn’t sit well with too many people when practical attempts are made for political activism, and this will all ultimately hurt good moral individuals in need the most.

    9. Louise Mensch (whom AS has talked about positively in the past, and has chastised Putin like this site has) often talks about how the many enablers of Putin will possibly be punished possibly, including Trump and various leftists (including Jeremy Corbyn). I may not trust Mensch entirely, but leftists that this site promoted (including Corbyn again) are also enablers of Putin, and are, thus, enablers of Trump. How ironic and wrong. I want Russia, the UK and the USA compromised, not in a state of uncompromised existence due to a bizarre dependent relationship between leftists and rightists in America and elsewhere.

    10. You deserve legal condemnation for enabling Trump.

  9. Philistine says:

    @Robert Young

    What, do you think anybody on this planet is dumb enough to be influenced by open slander and lies such as “Philistine (a supporter of Trump and Putin”? This will only be proof of how our enemies are incapable of engaging in honest debate.

    “This site celebrates people voting (for stuff that this site wants), and ignores the fact that Americans (regardless of their status) are too dangerous and/or stupid for ANYTHING, which Hitler himself acknowledged. I, on the other hand, have never even supported democracy on this site, and I oppose it.”

    I guess that you, in your typical hypocrisy, would also oppose the Germans having voted for the NSDAP.

    “The fact that Trump was even elected (which is a horrible reality that I’ve never even denied, even though you falsely imply that I do) was caused by people like you practically ignoring abuses committed by the Clinton’s and Obama;”

    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/23/trump-obama-administration-separate-families-immigration/728060002/

    “this site still does nothing to hold Obama and the Clinton’s practically accountable”

    Are they in power? So they are not relevant.

    “It did nothing to censure the Obama Administration for using weapons against immigrants (of various statuses).”

    It’s curious how these accusations seem to come solely from Trump supporters. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/23/trump-obama-administration-separate-families-immigration/728060002/

    “The fact that this site (the blog and main site) can’t acknowledge Hitler’s own preferrance for FDR over Stalin”

    This site doesn’t live in the 1940′s. Neither do the US or Russia, come to think of it. So what kind of moron would form an opinion on a country based on how it was nearly 100 years ago? Oh, right. You.

    “its whole stance on Russia still remains inconsistent, which Putin probably benefits from.”

    According to you, this blog is nonsense but it is also so powerful that our mere silence on Putin benefits him. Once we make a post on him Russia had better collapse like it was made of flour.

    “which leaves poor Muslims”

    Finding themselves unable to stop Muhammad through conventional means, the Quraysh got into another tactic: slandering and telling lies about him and his message. God knows how that worked out for them.

    “This site enables Trump and his base because they can easily point out to its insincere and inconsistent nature,”

    Weird then that no Trump supporter has ever done so. Are you a Trump supporter?

    “Louise Mensch (whom AS has talked about positively in the past, and has chastised Putin like this site has)”

    Wait, what? So have we or have we not criticized Putin? I’d better write two comments in a row pointing out your inconsistencies! At least I’d have a concrete example instead of empty accusations.

    “I want Russia, the UK and the USA compromised,”

    Okay. So what have you done about these goals of yours recently? Tell us about them on a nonsense blog?

    “You deserve legal condemnation for enabling Trump.”

    Let me know when you sue the millions of his voters in his home territory or something.

  10. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    “White” and Jewish identity politics are the biggest enablers of Putin and Trump. Both are based in fear of the “other”, the ‘foreigner’.

    Deuteronomy can be found in the Judeo-Christian west, and in Russia.

    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21

    How Putin’s Russia uses Soviet-era tricks to evoke racist white fears
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/10/09/how-putins-russia-uses-soviet-era-tricks-to-evoke-racist-white-fears/?utm_term=.bd1b93b39516

    “The Jewish Daily Forward reports this week that supporters of the far-right Jewish Defense League (JDL) are sympathetic to white nationalism of the “alt-right”—and have “no plans to push back against anti-Jewish march planned in Whitefish, Montana by a neo-Nazi”. — Jewish Daily Forward

  11. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    @RY:

    “You deserve legal condemnation for enabling Trump.”

    Aryanists appear to me to be some of the only people on the planet that accurately assess the ideology of both Trump’s and Putin’s supporters; whilst simultaneously identifying why there is no true Leftist response to these supporters and their ideology of fear.

    You deserve a straight-jacket….

  12. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    @Everyone:

    Since it’s Sunday and this is a post on “Greater Israel”, I thought I’d leave this comment here.

    I have to say, it’s always been a little amusing to me to see how many supposed anti-Jewish websites always seem to rally around the evil Talmud. That it is “Talmudic Judaism” that is the culprit, and how “Talmudic Jews” in Israel are the “fake Jews”. I find myself amused at all of this, because I inevitably end up wondering if any of these advocates against “Talmudic Jewry” have ever actually read the Old Testament of the “Holy Bible”? In fact, I would argue, we could take just one passage out of the “Holy Bible”, and use it to understand the underlying ideology of all of Jewry.

    So, let us do it now. Let’s all just take a deep breath, relax, and read the passage. Then we can sit back and let our imaginations run wild in regards to how this passage has effected the rest of humanity, considering the Jews have been in diaspora for the last 2000 plus years.

    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21

    Don’t think most Jews are aware of this passage in the Hebrew Torah?

    Netanyahu’s Son Avner Wins National Bible Quiz
    https://www.haaretz.com/1.5042731

    Or, maybe most of them know it like the back of their hands?

    Either way, I find myself amazed that most people never even question the book of Deuteronomy. One need not ever even open the Talmud, or the Tanakh, to understand that there is something seriously wrong with Jewishness. Yet, Westerners for some reason deemed it necessary to build an entire civilization around the Torah’s tenants; which subsequently is one of the many reasons I find it hard to believe in western superiority, because obviously only a complete ignoble imbecile would do something like that.

  13. Edward Ingersoll says:

    I’ve done some more reading of this website in their “politics” section and I’ve found reference to George Lincoln Rockwell. In case you didn’t know, Rockwell laid the ideological foundations for the postwar American white nationalist movement. The reason Rockwell allied with Malcolm X, Nation of Islam, and other militant pro-black groups is because they were also opposed to integration. You can go and read Malcolm X’s speeches and interviews, and he’s talked about similar things. A lot of pro-blacks are also pro-segregation. I believe that everybody should stick with their own race.

    And another thing I’d like to comment on is your article in the politics section about white nationalism, specifically the part where you said that white nationalism is not an actual nationalism, because it is international and applies to all white people regardless of nation. The first problem with this argument is encoded within the word “nationalism” itself. The greek root word for “nation” is “ethnos”, literally meaning “a tribe, a nation, a people”. So white/racial nationalism (or white/racial internationalism, which could also be an accurate term in the pan-Europeanist sense) is an entirely sensical term, because they are proud of their tribe; their in-group.

  14. Robert Young says:

    @Philistine

    1. You are an enabler of Trump and crimes against immigrants. Get over yourself.

    2. You said you oppose democracy and now you defend Germans voting for the NSDAP, while ignoring Hitler’s own distaste against America (having independent existence at all) and foreign powers using national socialism to secure themselves politically from democracy and other terrible things. You are the hypocrite that wants to picks and chooses when Hitler deserves support.

    3. So, because Obama and the Clinton’s are no longer in power (and may have not done as many crimes as Trump has done, or at least in your opinion), despite holding major political influence to this day (as shown by their open support for various Democrats in the 2018 midterm election, and Hillary’s own talks about how she still wants to be elected president), their crimes against immigrants (such as the Obama administration’s use of chemical weapons against them, confirmed by sources not in league with Trunp) are irrelevant themselves. Great to know. Your hypocrisy is one of the many reasons why Trump is in power, even if your contribution is ultimately small. And, BTW, by your own logic, Hitler was wrong to enable the sacking of Gregor Strasser, his former opponent, when he initiated the night of the long knives, and trump doesn’t deserve condemnation when he stops being president! Tell me more how you’re not an enabler of Trump.

    3. When this site brings up events from the 1940’s, Hitler and Stalin, then they are at least allowing the 1940’s hold some relevancy; and, when this site does, it can’t even be sincere, open and direct about such subjects.

    4. This site is nonsensical and inconsistent that most people do not care about, but I hate to see this site gain practical relevance. My contributions include seeing this site doesn’t become practically relevant.

    5. You enable slanders against Muhammad.

    6. This site doesn’t care about countering Putin and Russia in any practical and equitable manner. It’ll attack Putin and Russia, but then it will then promote Jeremy Corbyn and anti-establishment types in the USA’s Democratic Party, which are two subjects that are enablers of Putin themselves. Such inconsistencies deserve condemnation; not support.

    8. I don’t have the practical ability to sue the people that have voted for Trump. I can at least prevent this site from gaining relevance by condemning it. It’s also quite condemnable that this site hasn’t started a fundraiser to attain the practical means to sue Trump’s voters.

    9. I also thank you for wasting your time in responding to me rather than engage in something practical for good moral activism. What’s that word called, foppery??? You’re almost as pathetic as LR (who’s needlesly accused AS of possibly becoming Manson-like, and couldn’t even get the courage to really condemn AS needlesly condemned him). I also want to thank everyone who had the opportunity to justly condemn americanophile, JJ, regardless of the reason behind such just condemnation.

    @person that can’t even formally challenge me to a duel, but, instead, just basically makes wishes against me that’ll never come true

    This site wants to attack Putin and then promote people that don’t give darn about Putin’s power and influence. Any acurate assessment is, thus, formally compromised. Also, plenty of other people and establishments understand the connections between Trump and Putin. You’re just too arrogant to admit to that.

    @Edward

    1. Rockwell was a white nationalist (justly or unjustly) that thought most American were dumb, and had a falling out with Malcolm X after Malcolm X became more racially inclusive (justly or unjustly).

    2. Your points on nationalism and white people make objective sense, regardless of my own general feelings towards the very existence of white nationalist (which are pretty negative).

    @everyone

    Death to America (the worst nation in the world), Russia and the UK! Anyone who sincerely supports any of those three countries deserves to be condemned!

  15. Philistine says:

    @Edward Ingersoll

    “I’ve done some more reading of this website in their “politics” section and I’ve found reference to George Lincoln Rockwell. In case you didn’t know, Rockwell laid the ideological foundations for the postwar American white nationalist movement. The reason Rockwell allied with Malcolm X, Nation of Islam, and other militant pro-black groups is because they were also opposed to integration. You can go and read Malcolm X’s speeches and interviews, and he’s talked about similar things.”

    I guess you didn’t read this part:

    “Without ammunition, even the greatest general on earth would lose a war. And if the people who have a monopoly on the ammunition require me to say “abracadabra” three times every morning in order to get enough bullets to annihilate the enemy, then, by God, I will say “abracadabra” not three times, but nine times and most enthusiastically, regardless of whether it is nonsense, lies, or what it may be. Once we have achieved power, it is an entirely different matter.” – George Lincoln Rockwell

    The interpretation: “National Socialist who pretended to be a neo-Nazi in order to more easily get numerical support against Jewish power. Result: Zionist agents saw through the ruse and assassinated him so that he would be replaced by his followers, who are actual neo-Nazis. (The same thing happened to Malcolm X who had around the same time also revealed his rejection of racism.)”

    Bonus quote from Malcolm X: “There were tens of thousands of pilgrims, from all over the world. They were of all colors, from blue-eyed blondes to black-skinned Africans. But we were all participating in the same ritual, displaying a spirit of unity and brotherhood that my experiences in America had led me to believe never could exist between the white and the non-white. America needs to understand Islam, because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem. You may be shocked by these words coming from me. But on this pilgrimage, what I have seen, and experienced, has forced me to rearrange much of my thought patterns previously held.

    “The first problem with this argument is encoded within the word “nationalism” itself. The greek root word for “nation” is “ethnos”, literally meaning ‘a tribe, a nation, a people’.”

    If you wanted to tackle our “argument” (it’s not an argument, it’s a description of reality even admitted by tribalists as I will show you) from an etymological perspective, the worst thing you could have done is look at a Greek word when “nation” comes from Latin. The term “natio,” which literally means “birth,” refers—yes—to tribes, but never to such a thing as “the white tribe.” See, for example, The Natural History by Pliny the Elder, book III, chapter 24: “Many nations dwell among the Alps; but the more remarkable, between Pola and the district of Tergeste, are the Secusses, the Subocrini, the Catali, the Menocaleni, and near the Carni the people formerly called the Taurisci, but now the Norici.”
    Another example, from Tacitus: “Nunc de Suebis dicendum est, quorum non una ut Chattorum Tencterorumve gens; maiorem enim Germaniae partem obtinent, propriis adhuc nationibus nominibusque discreti, quamquam in commune Suebi vocentur.”
    (“I must now speak of the Suevi, who are not one nation as are the Chatti and Tencteri, for they occupy the greater part of Germany, and have hitherto been divided into separate tribes with names of their own, though they are called by the general designation of Suevi.”)

    But this useless history does not define Nationalism in modern political discourse. Nationalism as a political concept started in the 19th century. This is when we can start speaking about modern nations, not tribes. Because to be a Nationalist is to support one’s country and its people. The Unification of Germany is an example of Nationalism. The independence movements in former colonial states are examples of Nationalism. Tribalism, however, is a completely different thing. Here is a tribalist ideologue rejecting his fellow Norwegians, and Norway as a whole, because they’re not “white”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rprBLT8SPjg
    In another video of his (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpvusgY0SQY), his first slogan is “Nationalism is dead, long live tribalism.”

    “So white/racial nationalism (or white/racial internationalism, which could also be an accurate term in the pan-Europeanist sense) is an entirely sensical term, because they are proud of their tribe; their in-group.”

    “White/racial nationalism” being equivalent to “white/racial internationalism” (in other words, it has nothing to do with Nationalism) is only “entirely sensical” for people with severe cognitive dissonance. @IIWII should get a straight-jacket for you too.

  16. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    “White” and Jewish identity politics are the biggest enablers of Putin and Trump. Both are based in fear of the “other”, the ‘foreigner’.

    Deuteronomy can be found in the Judeo-Christian west, and in Russia.

    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21

    How Putin’s Russia uses Soviet-era tricks to evoke racist white fears
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/10/09/how-putins-russia-uses-soviet-era-tricks-to-evoke-racist-white-fears/?utm_term=.bd1b93b39516

    “The Jewish Daily Forward reports this week that supporters of the far-right Jewish Defense League (JDL) are sympathetic to white nationalism of the “alt-right”—and have “no plans to push back against anti-Jewish march planned in Whitefish, Montana by a neo-Nazi”. — Jewish Daily Forward

  17. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    “White” and Jewish identity politics are the biggest enablers of Putin and Trump. Both are based in fear of the “other”, the ‘foreigner’. Both have a relation to the Hebrew Torah\Old Testament:

    Christian Identity\British Israelism has infiltrated almost every “white” supremacist ideology on the planet at this point. Christian Identity was supported by Jewish Rabbis in its founding years:

    “Another source describes the emergence of Christian Identity from British Israelism as a “remarkable transition”, also noting that traditional British Israelites were advocates of philosemitism which paradoxically changed to antisemitism and racism under Christian Identity. In fact, British Israelism itself had several Jewish members, and it received support from rabbis throughout the 19th century; within British politics it supported Benjamin Disraeli, who was descended from Sephardi Jews.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity

    The book of Deuteronomy can be found in the Judeo-Christian west as well as Putin’s Orthodox Russia.

    Tribalism = In-group altruism, Out-Group indifference.
    http://aryanism.net/philosophy/arya/tribalism-vs-universalism/

    “Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it.” — Deuteronomy 23:21

    Was Columbus Jewish?
    “In his ship’s log, Columbus makes frequent references to the Hebrew Bible, to Jerusalem to Moses, David, Abraham, Isaac, and Sarah.” https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/destination-the-new-world/

    How White People Got Made
    “The Virginians legislated a new class of people into existence: the whites. They gave the whites certain rights, and took other rights from blacks. White, as a language of race, appears in Virginia around the 1680s, and seems to first appear in Virginia law in 1691. And thus whiteness, and to a degree as well blackness, was born in the mind of America. https://medium.com/message/how-white-people-got-made-6eeb076ade42

    How Putin’s Russia uses Soviet-era tricks to evoke racist white fears
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/10/09/how-putins-russia-uses-soviet-era-tricks-to-evoke-racist-white-fears/?utm_term=.bd1b93b39516

    “The Jewish Daily Forward reports this week that supporters of the far-right Jewish Defense League (JDL) are sympathetic to white nationalism of the “alt-right”—and have “no plans to push back against anti-Jewish march planned in Whitefish, Montana by a neo-Nazi”. — Jewish Daily Forward

  18. ItIsWhatItIs says:

    @RY:

    “@everyone

    Death to America (the worst nation in the world), Russia and the UK! Anyone who sincerely supports any of those three countries deserves to be condemned!”

    But no death to Israel right? Got it….

    :D

  19. Lucius Rhine says:

    America is not a nation, it is called the “United States of America”. America is an ideal to be achieved, while the United States is the presently existent republic in which capital reigns supreme.

    This is an important rhetorical semantic difference, as the title “United States” still implies the western plurality pushed by the Jew. Americans are, therefore, residents of any American continent (and is culturally thus in any Latin American nation). In this way, the sum of the American continents are held in the spiritual ideal of America and her citizens.

    Keep up the deep digging, AS.

  20. Edward Ingersoll says:

    @Philistine “I guess you didn’t read this part:

    “Without ammunition, even the greatest general on earth would lose a war. And if the people who have a monopoly on the ammunition require me to say “abracadabra” three times every morning in order to get enough bullets to annihilate the enemy, then, by God, I will say “abracadabra” not three times, but nine times and most enthusiastically, regardless of whether it is nonsense, lies, or what it may be. Once we have achieved power, it is an entirely different matter.” – George Lincoln Rockwell

    The interpretation: “National Socialist who pretended to be a neo-Nazi in order to more easily get numerical support against Jewish power. Result: Zionist agents saw through the ruse and assassinated him so that he would be replaced by his followers, who are actual neo-Nazis. (The same thing happened to Malcolm X who had around the same time also revealed his rejection of racism.)””

    That’s your personal interpretation, Philistine. That quote came from a letter he sent to Savitri Devi, according to a Google search. I couldn’t find that in his books “This Time The World” and “White Power”, both of which I’ve read and contradict literally everything he said on this website.

  21. Robert Young says:

    @Edward

    Those specific quotes by Rockwell listed on this website just show Rockwell to be anti-American, anti-Christian, and desperate for attention. None of that contradicts Rockwell’s overall white nationalist message, even if he still, nonetheless, personally and secretly did not like white nationalism himself. Philistine and others on this site are just desperate to show off Rockwell as anti-white, and will even overplay and misinterpret those quotes.

  22. Edward Ingersoll says:

    @Robert Young Yes, that is interesting. I don’t see how that quote from Philistine “proved” that he secretly did not like white nationalism. The quote is extremely vague, and the only thing that I can make out of it is that he would use any means necessary to achieve total victory to, in the end, take (((them))) down. Philistine has obviously never read his seminal works “This Time The World” or “White Power”.

  23. Robert Young says:

    @Edward

    Philistine probably has read ‘White Power’ and still probably thinks that Rockwell is not a white nationalist. Considering the information that is available to the public, Rockwell was a white nationalist, just one who dumbed down his message for Americans (especially the Christian kind) to attain support and supplies (such as money). Rockwell also ultimately tried to compromise America’s sovereignty by establishing his ‘World Union of National Socialists’; and any true National Socialist is opposed to America’s sovereignty and desires to see Germany rise again.

    Let’s also not forget that Rockwell transformed his ‘American Nazi Party’ to the ‘National Socialist White People’s Party’ in order to “counter” the NAACP, much to Matt Koehl’s dismay (the same person who helped to provide the public with Rockwell’s letters to Devi which shows both Savitri Devi and Rockwell to be both anti-Christian and anti-America, as seen in those quotes on this site). I’ll even go as far and say that this site more similar to Koehl than it is to Rockwell.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>