Like anti-Black racism, anti-Jewish racism cannot have a place in any legitimate anti-racist liberation movement, yet unfortunately, like with anti-Black racism, those who spout anti-Jewish ideas refuse to acknowledge their prejudice, instead qualifying their hateful words with claims to good intentions.
There is no such thing as “anti-black racism”. Racism is always pro-ingroup, never anti-outgroup. I have never encountered a racist who is genuinely “anti-black”. Even William Pierce, who in The Turner Diaries advocates killing all “black” people in the world:
is not “anti-black”, because he advocates such killing as a way to benefit “whites”. Ask Pierce if he is willing for all “whites” to die as the price for all “blacks” dying simultaneously, and he is certain to refuse such a deal. Pierce measures everything according to its benefit to “whites”. He is thus pro-”white”, not “anti-black”. This – being pro-ingroup – is what it means to be racist.
However, Jews want us to believe there is such an oxymoronic thing as “anti-black racism” in order to cloud the meaning of racism. Because Jews themselves measure everything according to its benefit to Jews. Jews are thus racist: they are pro-Jewish. But they do not want us to notice this, hence are trying to disorient anti-racists into thinking instead about being pro-”black” (note their use of the deliberately long-winded term “anti-racist liberation movement”, which, in conjunction with the other deliberately long-winded term “anti-black racism”, subtly conditions the reader to erroneously presume anti-racism is about “liberation”, implicitly of “blacks”).
Genuine anti-racism, however, must be the structural opposite of racism. Given that racism (as defined above) is about being pro-ingroup, anti-racism must be about being anti-ingroup. Therefore it is not “black” “liberation” that anti-racists care about. Anti-racists only care about exterminating racists. There is no “anti-racist liberation movement”. There is simply an anti-racist movement – a movement against racists.
And those racists include Jews. So there is certainly no “anti-Jewish racism”. There is only anti-Jewish anti-racism. (Similarly there is no “anti-white racism” either, but only “anti-white anti-racism”.)
When Black celebrities claim that their anti-Semitism is actually a “pro-Black” stance, they assert that the only possible form of liberation for Black people is through creating our own “Other.”
Whichever celebrities made such a claim, we disavow them. If their anti-Jewishness has a pro-”black” motive, I guarantee that they will also be willing to become pro-Jewish as soon as they are shown that being pro-Jewish can be a more efficient way to be pro-”black”. (Indeed, some already have so turned within a matter of weeks since their initial outbursts against Jewry.) The only celebrities (or ordinary people too) who will be able to remain steadfastly anti-Jewish are those whose anti-Jewishness was never motivated by pro-”black” intentions, but only ever by authentic hatred towards racists, including Jews.
There is a huge difference between critiquing whiteness—a racist fabrication with undeniable social consequences—and denigrating Jewishness.
Not really. Jewishness is also a racist fabrication (a tribe marking its own ingroup), and with a much longer history of undeniable social consequences.
Anti-Black racism (as well as anti-Arab racism) as practiced by Jewish institutions and individuals ought to be critiqued where observed, but on the basis of white assimilation and imperialism, not on the basis of Jewish identity.
But Jewish institutions do not in fact practice “anti-black racism” or “anti-Arab racism”. They practice pro-Jewish racism (which includes favouritism for Jewish “whites” over non-Jewish “whites”, disproving that racism by Jews is merely ordinary “white” racism). Why, then, should they not be critiqued on the basis of Jewish identity?
Which is not to say, on the other hand, that Eurocentrism is not a significant aspect of Jewish identity. Pro-Jewish racism will certainly prefer Jews over non-Jews when both are perceived as similarly “white”, but at the same time is likely to prefer “white” non-Jews over even Jews (or those who claim Jewishness) if the latter are perceived as “non-white”:
the Igbo Jewish community is not recognized by the Israel’s Supreme Court or by any other Jewish religious group. Indeed, while they identify themselves as part of the worldwide Jewish community, they are still struggling to be recognized by other Jews. Indeed, Igbo Jews asserts that they are connected to Judaism via their Jewish blood as they claim to be descendants of the ancient Israelites. In S. Afsai article, an affiliate of the Gihon Hebrews’ Synagogue declares: “We say we are Jews from blood. We are now excluded; we cannot go and participate as Jews in any place. I make an appeal that we be recognized, not excluded and isolated from other Jews.”
Some Jewish Israelis of European descent, known also as Ashkenazi Jews, have been described as viewing themselves as superior to non-Ashkenazi Jews. They are accused of maintaining an elite position in Israeli society, with some describing the attitudes of Ashkenazim as racist or of being a manifestation of racism.
Israeli society in general – and Ashkenazi Jews in particular – have been described as holding discriminatory attitudes towards Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent, known as Mizrahi Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Oriental Jews. A variety of Mizrahi critics of Israeli policy have cited “past ill-treatment, including the maabarot, the squalid tent cities into which Mizrahim were placed upon arrival in Israel; the humiliation of Moroccan and other Mizrahi Jews when Israeli immigration authorities shaved their heads and sprayed their bodies with the pesticide DDT
In the 1950s, 1,033 children of Yemenite immigrant families disappeared. In most instances, the parents claim that they were told their children were ill and required hospitalization. Upon later visiting the hospital, it is claimed that the parents were told that their children had died though no bodies were presented or graves which have later proven to be empty in many cases were shown to the parents. Those who believe the theory contend that the Israeli government as well as other organizations in Israel kidnapped the children and gave them for adoption. Secular Israeli Jews of European descent were accused of collaborating in the disappearance of babies of Yemeni Jews and anti-religious motives and anti-religious coercion were alleged. Some went further to accuse the Israeli authorities of conspiring to kidnap the Yemeni children due to “racist” motives.
there have been a series of reports in the Israeli press about alleged acts of police brutality against Ethiopian Israelis, with many in the community saying they are unfairly targeted and treated more harshly than other citizens
This is especially the case in the sphere of reproduction, when Jews frequently reproduce with “white” non-Jews with the offspring accepted as Jews and without systematic worry about polluting the Jewish gene pool, yet when it comes to “non-whites” (even if Jewish), all hell breaks loose:
In 1962, authorities in Israel were accused by articles in the Indian press of racism in relation to Jews of Indian ancestry (called Bene Israel). In the case that caused the controversy, the Chief Rabbi of Israel ruled that before registering a marriage between Indian Jews and Jews not belonging to that community, the registering rabbi should investigate the lineage of the Indian applicant for possible non-Jewish descent
In 2010, Israel was accused of a “sterilization policy” aimed towards Ethiopian Jews, for allowing the prescription of contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera to the community. They stated that the Israeli government deliberately gives female Ethiopian Jews long-lasting contraceptive drugs like Depo-Provera.
Israel initially denied the claim of imposing a sterilization policy on the Ethiopian women, but later admitted to it … 35 Ethiopian women who had immigrated to Israel said they had been told they would not be allowed into Israel unless they agreed to the shots.
So basically in Jewish eyes: “white” Jews > “white” non-Jews >> “non-white” Jews > “non-white” non-Jews.
To be truly anti-Jewish must include rejecting Eurocentrism. This is why only leftists can be truly anti-Jewish, though admittedly even among leftists many have yet to clear the poison inside their own minds. If you need help with this, or want to help others with this, please join us here: