It’s not that difficult…..

Italy is one country where a working model for refugee resettlement has already been developed, which I first drew attention to last year using the example of Riace. Now more and more villages are participating:

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2016/04/refugee-settlement-programs-save-dying-italian-villages-160421113908416.html

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/08/syrian-refugees-revive-italian-village-camini-160830065301496.html

The question is: why aren’t other EU countries (except Scotland, as also previously noted), Germany in particular, emulating this model? There are villages and small towns dotted all over the map, yet the governments would rather keep refugees concentrated in asylum centres that are not only increasingly overcrowded and hence increases stress among occupants and volunteers alike, but also make refugees easy targets for far-right arson and other terror attacks. Unless, of course, Merkel is – as we have suspected long ago – deliberately trying to do a spectacularly bad job of handling the refugee crisis in order to bring on the Zionist-scripted backlash right on schedule, as can now be seen in the increasing popularity of the AfD…..

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/04/europe/germany-alternative-fur-deutschland-afd-angela-merkel/

(Isn’t it suspicious how little media coverage has been given to Italy’s village revival approach to the refugee influx, especially compared to the fence-building approach of Hungary etc.? It’s as if they want people to think that, because it is inefficient to keep refugees in asylum centres, therefore it is acceptable to let them starve on the border rather than try alternative resettlement schemes.)

This entry was posted in Aryan Sanctuary. Bookmark the permalink.

135 Responses to It’s not that difficult…..

  1. Board owner says:

    Euthanasia too, as well as cannibalism, is okay sometimes? Cool, muslim nazis advocate cannibalising the elderly, I like it as a campaign slogan. You should run with the edgy stuff more often.

  2. Jason says:

    ““Canaan, merchant, traffick. see HEBREW kana” Cain later built a city through merchandice”

    Canaanites are descended from Canaan (a Sethite a.k.a. Turanian), not from Cain, you moron:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canaan_(Bible)

    Here you expose yourself as a dumbass once again. Cain’s descendants were the Kenites and they all intermarried with all the other Canaanite populations like the Hivites, Amorites, Hittites, etc. This can all be proven in Genesis 34 where it’s obvious that this was the common practice among the Canaanite populations. The israelites were forbidden from mixing like this.

    Jesus even held the Jewish Pharisees accountable for the death of Abel and said that they were of the seed (Race) of the serpent. How could he hold them accountable if they did not descend from the bloodline of Cain?

    Now I find this very irrelevant and I’m not even a Christian identist. I’m just simply paraphrasing what they believe in here (and point to what the Bible really says).

    “False. For example, the random Norwegian and the random German could be of different blood types, but the random Norwegian and the random Liberian could be of the same blood type. This could mean that if the Norwegian needed even something as practical as a BLOOD TRANSFUSION, the Liberian could donate blood to him whereas the German could not.”

    And? Some blood types are even more common in certain populations than in others. Race matters even more when people need an organ transplant or bone marrow transplant,

    “like Devan — you’re of mixed race. Multiracial patients often have an incredibly hard time finding life-saving marrow matches. When Devan, whose father is Caucasian and mother is part Indian, was first diagnosed with leukemia, his family did a search of the international marrow registry that contains over 14 million donors and came up empty. “We knew there was nothing out there for him,” Tatlow says.

    while two out of three Caucasians find a match, the chances of a patient from another ethnic background can be as low as one in four”

    http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html

    “Already prone to the kidney-destroying illnesses of diabetes and high blood pressure, blacks have another health disparity: They are less likely to be a match when a kidney becomes available.”

    Although organ transplants can occur between races, matches are more difficult to achieve for blacks. Transplant recipients must have similar genes in their immune systems to those of the donor. Otherwise, the body will reject the organ.”

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2013/01/21/blacks-tougher-finding-kidney-transplants/1851737/

    “What do you mean by “developed”? According to Western standards, complexification is development. According to our standards, simplification is development.”

    I mean as in not engaging in cannibalism or brutal gang-rapes. I mean as in not practicing Voodoo or cutting of womens vaginas and “store” them in your pockets to get some “magical healing”. I mean as in not living in shitbrick houses without electricity or modern things. I mean as in having and practicing modern medicine, health and hygiene. I mean as in not eating “bush-meat” that contain HIV, Ebola or Aids. I mean as in… I think you get the point.

    “We judge people as individuals.”

    Is that also true for Jews? There are some nice Jews out there who want to help humanity. Right? Or do you only judge other mongrels and Negroes as individuals?

    Why don’t you judge Lions as individuals that can come and stay with us in our homes? There was a vegetarian Lion who lived some time ago,

    “Little Tyke turning away her head from meat (and wincing).

    At four years old, the mature African lioness weighed 352 pounds. Her body stretched 10 feet 4 inches long and could run 40 miles per hour. Her skull, highly adapted to killing and eating prey, possessed short powerful jaws. Normally, African lions eat gnus, zebras, gazelles, impalas, and giraffes. This particular big cat, in her prime and perfect health, chose a more gentle way of life, vegetarian!”

    http://www.animalliberationfront.com/Saints/Authors/Stories/LittleTyke.htm

    You see, not all Lions will eat other animals or humans brutally alive. There are vegetarian animals that we should judge as individuals…

    Even though the mongrels and negroes that pour in now are more likely to engage in taharrush, gang-rapes, cannibalism, murder, assault, etc… WE SHOULD ONLY JUDGE THEM AS INDIVIDUALS LIKE THE JEWISH MEDIA SAYS. The same should also be true for Lions.

    LIONS WELCOME!

    “Of course it doesn’t! What country (other than a communist country) should want to take back people who themselves have clearly expressed that they do not want to live there? That would be imprisonment! The whole point of migration is to allow people who dislike the country they were born in to move to a country they prefer!”

    Here you expose yourself as a dumbass once again.

    These “refugees” claim that the regimes and countries they are fleeing from are war-zone areas where the governments are out to get them, torture them or kill them. What does it say when their governments are so fucking oblivious to them and want to AVOID THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY COULD HELP THEIR NATIVE GOVERNMENTS THROUGH WORK? What fucking country wants to avoid hard-working people in their prime-age who are working and helping the economy?

    If, on the other hand, these so called “refugees” are low-trash criminals seeking to leach, loot, assault, rape, etc… THEN IT’S UNDERSTANDABLE WHY EVEN THEIR DISGUSTING SHIT-FILLED BROWN MONGREL NATIVE COUNTRIES WANT TO AVOID THEM.

    Do you understand now?

  3. Lucius Rhine says:

    It’s funny that you actually show yourself to be an enemy. If it were viable and I could lead others to do the same, I would totally live in a shitbrick house without electricity or “modern things.” Because that’s all they are, things. You are in love with the material world, we seek to leave it. We are diametrically opposed. Yes, that lion we would judge as an individual, but when you say “Lions welcome,” that is not treating them as individuals. However, are at the top of the food chain, while refugees are kind of at the bottom – the point lies in the individual’s position in the food chain has nothing to do with quality.

  4. John Johnson says:

    @Jason
    “You’re re-using the same Jewish media-lie that they have been touting for over 40 years?”

    LOL, do you describe things as “Jewish” whenever you don’t understand them or are proven wrong? The level of cognitive dissonance here is pretty pathetic.

    “If we will have this problem isn’t it just better to give good economic (and other things) incentives for big families like in the Third Reich?”

    NS Germany encouraged racially hygienic couples to have large families because Germany was in the middle of a world war and couldn’t easily bring in immigrants to solve its manpower and old age dependency ratio problems. The world’s population in 1940 was only 2.3 billion. Today it is 7.3 billion and will reach 9 billion by 2040. Encouraging people to have bigger families without limit is not a helpful move in today’s world.

    Besides, the old age dependency ratio problem was started by people having big families in the first place. The “Baby Boom” that took place after WWII (where birthrates were drastically higher than they were pre-WWII) and subsequent decline of birthrates to pre-Baby Boom (and lower) levels is the reason why there are so many old people compared to young people in Western nations.

    This problem cannot be solved by merely increasing the birth rate (and thus population size)–that would require infinite expansion. We wish to stop the out of control growth of the human population. Encouraging immigration of young people from low-dependency-ratio nations to high-dependency-ratio nations (while at the same time as keeping the birth rate low in both nations) is the best way to get global population stable, and make it economically feasible to then decrease in an orderly manner.

    “Is it right to import African cannibals like General Butt Naked just because there are native White cannibals? I don’t understand your reasoning here, mate.”

    I don’t understand your false equivalence here, mate.

    We do not support forcibly “importing” people against their will. Do you know what country the ‘General’ lives in? (Hint: not your precious “white” one).

    ““Neolithic” and all that is just Jewish bullshit.”

    The Neolithic is Archaeology 101.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution

    “Cro-Magnon were a different species so I wouldn’t consider them to be related to modern Europeans.”

    Stop lying. I know you read my post, so I know you read this excerpt below (which I will repost so everyone has a chance to read it again):

    “Some 40,000 years ago, Cro-Magnons — the first people who had a skeleton that looked anatomically modern — entered Europe, coming from Africa. Geneticists now show that a Cro-Magnoid individual who lived in Southern Italy 28,000 years ago was a modern European, genetically as well as anatomically.
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715204741.htm

    “Isn’t it interesting that both of those groups that were persecuted as “tribalists” are the ultimate mongrels? Should we draw the conclusion that mongrels are the ultimate racists then?

    Thank you for claryfying that. Mongrelization leads to tribalism… just look at the Jews for fuck’s sake!”

    Good job contradicting yourself:
    “But with Jews you are pretending that they are “racists” when they are mongrelizing

    No Mongrel-race (whether they be Arabs, Mestizos, Jews, Brazilians, etc) can be the ultimate “racists” or “tribalist race-preservers”” -Jason

    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/its-not-that-difficult/comment-page-2/#comment-172540

    “Racial purity leads to kindness and inventions (for example modern medicine and technology for Africa).”

    Your very existence proves the “kindness” part false; but here is a further example of “white” kindness for reference:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Free_State#Mutilation

    “White skin and features i universally considered to be more attractive and gives more status than being brown or non-White.”

    Tanning beds used by more than a third, study finds:
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/29/indoor-tanning-increase/5028431/

    “Do you understand this?”

    Do you understand the difference between race and ethnicity yet?

    “JEWS ARE ACTIVELY HELPING “REFUGEES” TO IMMIGRATE TO EUROPE AND PROVIDE THEM WITH FOOD AND SHELTER THROUGH THEIR TRIP.”

    You mad bro? The Jewish plan is to make Gentiles like yourself mad. They’re reverse bluffing you into doing their bidding. (Protip: it’s working!) If you were literate, you could see that by reading one of our many articles on the subject:
    http://aryanism.net/politics/multiethnic-society/

    “How are the Jews going to create an “ethnostate” after that when Whites realize that they have been behind the immigration all along?”

    Well, first of all Israel already is a Jewish ethnostate.

    Also–in case you haven’t noticed–both Jew awareness and popularity of the far right are at the highest levels in decades. But many of these same Jew aware rightists are advocating “learning from Israel” and copying their blueprint for an ethnostate in order to apply it in their “white” nations.

    The creation of other ethnostates would actually make Israel’s existence more secure. Why do you think Israel was great friends with apartheid South Africa? Right now, Israel can be singled out for criticism as the world’s only ethnostate; but if other countries follow suit, Israel can say “don’t blame us, everyone else is doing it too!”… Jews are not scared of others having ethnostates.

    “A new multicultural Detroit where the “western civilization” is gone”

    I might actually move to Detroit or a nearby city in the future:
    https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/article/urban-agriculture-in-rust-belt-cities/
    http://www.dailydetroit.com/2015/07/06/10-detroit-urban-farms-rooting-goodness-into-the-city/
    http://therefugeeresponse.org/our-work/reap
    http://fusion.net/story/327865/cleveland-republican-convention-refugees-making-america-great-again/

    “But because of their faulty premise to believe in “Evolution” they must spin their bullshit about “Mesolithic” and “Neolithic”,

    Anthropoly is not a real science. It’s based on superficial observations and assumed similarities.”

    Wait.. You don’t believe in evolution or think anthropology is a science? The field of anthropology is literally the study of humanity, coming from the Greek words ánthr?pos (human) + lógos (study).

    Thanks for declaring once and for all that your views are entirely pulled out of your own ass. I’m not going to waste any more of my time here.

    @AS
    “I will leave the anthropology and other stuff to JJ.”

    The debate on the anthropology stuff is now over. At this point Jason is just throwing things against the wall to see if they stick. The repetition of blatant contradictions and lies might be a bit humorous if we had not already posted this quote in this very thread:

    “You are doing – Trump does this as well, by the way – precisely what Hitler described of his dishonourable debating opponents:

    “If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened.” – Adolf Hitler”
    http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/its-not-that-difficult/comment-page-2/#comment-172363

    He is not willing to budge on his views, and if any observers are not fully convinced of his ignorance by now, they can safely be counted as enemies.

  5. AS says:

    @Jason

    “Cain’s descendants were the Kenites and they all intermarried with all the other Canaanite populations”

    Which means that whatever lifestyle the post-intermarriage Canaanites had could just as easily have been of Sethite origin as Cainite. Which means the only way to find out what the Sethite lifestyle is to exclude the Cainite influence by looking at the pre-intermarriage Sethites (e.g. Noah) as well as the Sethites who did not intermarry ie. the Israelites (e.g. Jacob). The answer is that they were herders.

    “Jesus even held the Jewish Pharisees accountable for the death of Abel and said that they were of the seed (Race) of the serpent. How could he hold them accountable if they did not descend from the bloodline of Cain?”

    Because Paul edited what you are reading.

    “Some blood types are even more common in certain populations than in others.”

    The point is that blood transfusion is possible between individuals of different ethnicities, nor is blood transfusion always possible between individuals of the same ethnicity, therefore ethnicity is not what matters.

    “chances of a patient from another ethnic background can be as low as one in four”

    In other words it is not zero, therefore ethnicity is not what matters.

    “Is that also true for Jews? There are some nice Jews out there who want to help humanity. Right?”

    Wrong. Anyone born of Jewish parents who is nice will refuse to self-identify as a Jew. This is the point. Jews chose to CALL THEMSELVES Jews. “Whites” chose to CALL THEMSELVES “whites”. Goys and “non-whites”, in contrast, never called themselves Goys and “non-whites” until Jews and “whites” started CALLING THEM Goys and “non-whites” first.

    “Why don’t you judge Lions as individuals”

    I do.

    “What does it say when their governments are so fucking oblivious to them and want to AVOID THEM EVEN THOUGH THEY COULD HELP THEIR NATIVE GOVERNMENTS THROUGH WORK?”

    It says that they have no enthusiasm for working for that country. The whole point of migration is to allow people to find a country that they can be enthusiastic about working for.

    “everyone who made the racial criteria were White ”

    I highly doubt you have personally met every individual who lived in the Third Reich.

    “I’ve read Veronika K. Clark’s claim that The Allies had segregated units, while the Germans were multicultural and integrationist. I would like to have some more sources on that.”

    Just check the bibliography of her books, you moron.

    “animal cruelty, etc… are all much, much, much more prevalent in Africa than in Europe”

    I already posted these links above:

    http://chartsbin.com/view/12730

    http://chartsbin.com/view/1491

    Are intensive meat/dairy/egg/fur/etc. factories African inventions? Is trawling an African invention? Are vivisection, medical/cosmetic/etc. testing and other laboratory experimentation on animals African inventions? Are circuses, baiting, etc. African inventions? Are you fucking kidding me?!

    If we magically made Africa vanish 600 years ago, it would have made negligible difference to the total accumulated animal suffering by today. If we magically made Europe vanish 600 years ago, total accumulated animal suffering by today would not even be a trillionth of what it has actually been.

    Even some of your fellow far-rightists agree with us:

    “In warm climates, people survive easily. They do not need to devote much effort to finding food, as fruit grows plentifully in the forests year-round. Contemporary hunter-gatherers living in tropical areas eat relatively little meat, and anthropologists believe Africans have always been highly herbivorous. … In cold climates, on the other hand, food is difficult to come by, as fruit does not grow the whole year round. Consequently, people need to hunt to survive. In fact, primitive peoples in Arctic climates rely virtually exclusively on animal foods. Hunting requires creating tools and understanding of the behavior of animals, both of which are spurs to the evolution of intelligence.” – Ian Jobling (Gentile)

    “Richard Dawkins and many other Whites were born in Africa or non-White countries, but they are still acting like “Whites”, have White behavior, civility, intelligence, etc.”

    Dawkins is a Jew and promotes Islamophobia.

    “I myself am disgusted by gooks who eat dogs and cats, but I still respect them”

    You sound like Trump saying: “Nobody respects women more than I do.”

    “what backlash are you talking about?”

    ZC or BS. Either will do.

    “So what backlash is going to occur in brown mongrel India?”

    The Hindu far-right in India has been promoting Islamophobia for a long time. Savitri Devi saw it even back in her time, and opposed it:

    “The Hindu Mahasabha has bitterly criticised the pact between the followers of Subhas Bose and the Moslem League; “Hindu” members would never vote with the Mohammedans in the Bengal Assembly, oh no! But they do not mind voting with the Europeans, occasionally, against both the Mohammedans and the Forward Bloc. Now, this may be a good policy from the standpoint of petty party interest, but it has nothing in common with Indian nationalism.” – Savitri Devi

    “We still see numbers of low caste Hindus taking an active part in the rejoicings of their Mohammedan comrades at the time of Mohurrum. Why not? Hinduism, being no “religion” in the ordinary sense of the word, forces no fanaticism whatsoever upon its followers. But there is more to say; though Islam is a religion, and a very exclusive one too, in all matters where “idolatry” is concerned, we often used to see Musulmans taking an active part in widespread Hindu festivities such as the Durga Puja in Bengal, or the Jagannath Chariot festival. We can see them still do so wherever intensive communal propaganda has not poisoned their minds. We have seen ourselves, in Midnapur, in 1939, Musulmans pulling the Jagannath Chariots through the streets, along with their Hindu brothers. They were not doing so as Musulmans but simply as Bengalis, sharing in public processions and rejoicings as old as India itself.” – Savitri Devi

    “When I got up, I saw an old man standing by my side, with a book in his hand. It was the “visitor book”; the old man asked me in Hindustani if I would like to write something in it. Under the signatures of half a dozen European tourists, I wrote: “May the spirit of the Indian warrior who lies here inspire us all, — Hindus and Mohammedans alike, — and guide us in our present-day struggle for national independence.” – Savitri Devi

    “Israel and Jews ARE ACTIVELY HELPING MONGRELS TO INVADE EUROPE.”

    In order to trigger the backlash.

  6. Numinous Sun says:

    @Jason:

    “Neolithic” and all that is just Jewish bullshit.”

    LOL! What more need be said about Jason at this point…

  7. Numinous Sun says:

    For all the passers-by in the future:

    Defending the Neolithic Revolution
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hst5iaRa13Y

  8. Jason says:

    Why have you blocked my comments?

  9. Jason says:

    Be so kind to let my comments through for further debating…

  10. Everyone, just keep calm and listen to Horst Wessel Lied.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbkC7NOj0vQ

    As the farms and towns in Italy boom from new productivity, I just can hear that tune playing over the documented footage.

    The day for freedom and bread now dawns… indeed.

  11. Jason says:

    Haha, talk about being noble when you’re blocking someones comments in a debate…

  12. Jason says:

    Pages of text written to no avail. Good tactic to block the long posts while you’re letting my short complaints slip through. It gives the illusion that I’m a “defeated” liar and fraudster just throwing insults at the “noble Aryans”.

    Very Aryan indeed…

  13. Numinous Sun says:

    How refreshing it was to speak with a complete Muslim stranger for about an hour the other day. We talked about everything from 9/11; Israel, ISIS; Christian and Muslim unity, Jews, Hitler, Germany, etc. He also believes in the prophecy. He ended by saying he is a huge fan of Hitler.

    @Jason:

    “Pages of text written to no avail. Good tactic to block the long posts while you’re letting my short complaints slip through. It gives the illusion that I’m a “defeated” liar and fraudster just throwing insults at the “noble Aryans”.

    Very Aryan indeed…

    The problem is that your argument has remained unchanged even when dis-proven, which to me indicates you have an agenda of some sort? Regardless the reason, you are being dishonest. Trying to pay innocent now and turn it around on us isn’t going to work, at all…

  14. Jason says:

    “The problem is that your argument has remained unchanged even when dis-proven, which to me indicates you have an agenda of some sort? Regardless the reason, you are being dishonest. Trying to pay innocent now and turn it around on us isn’t going to work, at all…”

    If I’m “disproven” it should be very easy to just let my comments slip through so you can tear my arguments apart. Removing them (pages of text and links) and then claiming that I’m “dis-proven” is not a debatable stance.

    I have no agenda whatsoever and I’m not trying “hijack” your blog or anything of that sort. It’s your blog and I’m just a guest. You can do whatever you want to and that’s not my call. If I had an “agenda” this blog would be the last resort for me to make some kind of impact (I don’t know, but I believe that this movement and blog is very small in scale and size).

    Good luck with the site and blog.

  15. @Jason – Just wondering, do your long posts have two or more links in them? Such posts get moderated and don’t appear till they get approved. This could be the issue. It even happens with comments by people like me with a swastika, who are on the team :)

    Just before you get too worried and start accusing people… Peace.

  16. Numinous Sun says:

    @Jason:

    It will say “comment awaiting moderation” under your name on the comment you tried to post, if it is awaiting moderation. A post with more than one link gets flagged for moderation, as Saifullah al-Maslul stated.

    We don’t need to censor people here, and as far as I can tell we never have.

  17. Jason says:

    @ John Johnsson

    “LOL, do you describe things as “Jewish” whenever you don’t understand them or are proven wrong? The level of cognitive dissonance here is pretty pathetic.”

    Dude, I’ve heard this same argument over and over and over in the Jewish press, media, movies, documentaries, politicians, etc almost daily all of my life. It’s like the ultimate Jewish and leftist lie that they preach to justify the mongrelization of Europe by millions of criminal low-trash invaders.

    “NS Germany encouraged racially hygienic couples to have large families because Germany was in the middle of a world war and couldn’t easily bring in immigrants to solve its manpower and old age dependency ratio problems. The world’s population in 1940 was only 2.3 billion. Today it is 7.3 billion and will reach 9 billion by 2040. Encouraging people to have bigger families without limit is not a helpful move in today’s world.”

    I still don’t think that the plan was to do this through mongrelizing Germans with millions of Apefrican subhumans. If Hitler wanted to he could have easily imported millions of Apefricans to mongrelize and produce worthless mulatto bastards. All the people in the propaganda portraying the Aryan ideal were White and German. But many Poles and other Slavs were guest workers in Germany during the war.

    Look at these beasts tearing apart that poor dog and eating it alive, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-EW3TJn_5E

    But maybe videoclips like these persuaded the Germans to rally for race-mixing with these beasts?

    “Besides, the old age dependency ratio problem was started by people having big families in the first place. The “Baby Boom” that took place after WWII (where birthrates were drastically higher than they were pre-WWII) and subsequent decline of birthrates to pre-Baby Boom (and lower) levels is the reason why there are so many old people compared to young people in Western nations.”

    Yeah, that’s a problem. Another problem is that we have had too much peace and prosperity without war and bloodshed. A population always needs to have some tribal wars and violence to sustain itself and to keep itself “fresh” (this is how it has been all throughout history). A somewhat high death-rate with many new children being born is a recipe for a healthy population. By importing tens of millions of tribalist mongrels who will enjoy this peace, taking up monetary resources, mongrelizing/degenerating the population, medicine, “stealing” native women (doomed to lead to tribalism), you are even making the situation worse. The handicapped will not receive healthcare… the elderly will starve… the mentally ill will not receive help… This is all happening already today in every European country filled with mongrels.

    Ironically, many of the baby-boomers are behind this mess that we are in now. Many baby boomers demonstrated for desegregation, immigration, communism, etc.

    “I don’t understand your false equivalence here, mate.”

    You don’t understand because you see no problems with many Liberians and other subhumans engaging in cannibalism, gang-rapes, eating “bush-meat” containing diseases (even their supposed “doctors” eat bush-meat), hyper-promiscuity, superstitous Voodoo rituals, pedophilia, animal cruelty, etc. invading Europe

    These things are more prevalent among Africans than Europeans (I don’t think that anyone can dispute that).

    Do you understand, mate?

    And why do you bring up a war-criminal who ate small children alive by cutting out their hearts? I don’t think that any country except Liberia and other negroe countries would allow him to live freely as a guest.

    But maybe he could be converted as an Aryan freeganist?

    “Stop lying. I know you read my post, so I know you read this excerpt below (which I will repost so everyone has a chance to read it again):”

    The same could be said about negroes… they are certainly considered to have “modern” skulls and human features. Cro-Magnon were different in both genetics and facial features from modern White Europeans.

    That Cro-magnon were “modern” is as mush an assumption as lumping Arab mongrels and Jews together with Whites as “Caucausoids”. It’s pathetic and agenda-driven.

    “Good job contradicting yourself:”

    Seems like someone has a reading problem here.

    These people (especially Jews) are mongrels, a whole mixture of different kinds of races. Brazilians, Mexicans, Arabs, Jews, etc all have Arab, Jewish, Negroe and White blood flowing thorugh their veins. They are not, well – a “race”, but rootless mongrels who are angry and “tribal” in the sense that they want to steal resources from Europeans and exterminate them.

    But a real racist like me just laughs at them being try-hard “racists” when they are worthless mongrels wo would do anything to become White and are envious of Whites. Mongrels will always be hateful of good-looking Whites and feel hate towards them (that is until they have bedded a Whitey).

    Tribal negroes, Mestizos, Jews, etc have no problems at all with intermarrying with other people (especially Whites and lighter mongrels). This whole charade of being “tribal” is about hating Whites and acting on their genetic behavior.

    Look at these Jews pretending to be “racists” against their fellow genetic Arab blood brothers (yeah, just like Mexicans should be concerned about Mexicans marrying their Brazilian mongrel brothers, haha), http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3492183/Dial-1-know-Jew-going-Arab-Shocking-campaign-group-Israel-sets-hotline-attack-mixed-marriages.html

    According to Jewish teachings anyone who is born of a Jewish mother is a Jew (no matter who the father is). And fathers who marry non-Jewish women (like Zuckerberg) will get special blessings from the rabbis because they are converting non-Jews to Judaism. Campaigns like these are doomed to failure, because Jews are already mongrels and Judaism actively encourages mongrelization.

    Mongrels fighting with each other is incredibly funny and just proves how rootless these degenerates are.

    But when it comes to attacking Whites they are all unified in their hatred and “tribal” for real.

    By citing the people who were persecuted in the Third Reich as tribalists (you didn’t mention them by name though, but I knew), YOU “PROVED” THAT MONGRELS ARE THE ULTIMATE TRIBALISTS. You claimed this, not me.
    You falsely equated an anti-mongrelizer as me with mongrels who have race-mixed all throughout history as “tribalists”. By YOUR ASSERTION race-mixing mongrelizers are the ultimate tribalists.

    “Your very existence proves the “kindness” part false; but here is a further example of “white” kindness for reference:”

    Most sources for these “atrocities” comes from the book, King “Leopold’s Ghost”, written by Adam Hochschild. Now I don’t know if he’s Jewish or not (very jewish-sounding name), but his whole life has consisted of promoting leftists and Jewish agendas like mongrelization, immigration, homosexuality, “holocausts of minoritites”, etc. “10 million Congolese people died in a Holocaust” is certainly a very Jewish narrative.

    The biggest problem with this hoax is that not even close to 10 million people lived in Congo then (just like the Holohaox lie that 6 million mongrel Jews just disappeared).

    “Tanning beds used by more than a third, study finds:”

    A nice golden-brown tan looks quite healthy and attractive. I like it.

    But you won’t turn into a Negroe with kinky hair, brown Mongrel skin, or hooked mongrel noses by tanning (or flat Negroe noses).

    “Do you understand the difference between race and ethnicity yet?”

    Do you understand the difference between an average Liberian, Arab or Jew and a German? Can you look at Liberia and tell the difference between that country and Germany or Norway? Which country is more developed, humane, advanced and technological? Which country is more vicious?

    “You mad bro? The Jewish plan is to make Gentiles like yourself mad. They’re reverse bluffing you into doing their bidding. (Protip: it’s working!) If you were literate, you could see that by reading one of our many articles on the subject:
    http://aryanism.net/politics/multiethnic-society/

    Mad? Why would I be mad at Jews, Arabs, Negroes, and other mongrels acting on their mongrelized genes? Jews, Arabs, Negroes, etc can’t help the way they are and that they want to mongrelize, loot, and destroy all the European countries. Jews, Mestizos, Negroes will always act like this. This is just how it is, and I can’t change that. Me getting mad would be like a person getting angry at predators because they eat other animals.

    And mad as in how you mean? You mean getting mad by voting for Geert Wilders, Trump, UKIP, Marie Le Pen, etc? The people who Jews are giving media-exposure as extremists? The people who are against Islamic fundamentalism and too much immigration without a limit, but support assimilation, integration, “guest workers”, mongrelization, and immigrants as long as they are “secular”? These people are going to reverse-bluff us? And the jews themselves don’t even vote for these parties to usher us into the “reverse-bluff”.

    Or am I mad because Jews and the European Union have made comments like these,

    “The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.

    “Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

    He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.”

    “The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice.” – Coudenhove Kalergi (he became Jew-friendly when he realized that Jews wanted the same thing)

    And that the Counter-Jihad parties will only make things worse and usher the Europeans into a safe-space for more Jewish mongrelization and destruction?

    “Well, first of all Israel already is a Jewish ethnostate.”

    This is as laughable as claiming that Mexico or Brazil are “ethnostates”. Sure, it’s an “ethnostate” in as much as that you need to prove that you are “Jewish by DNA” or somehow (what the fuck is even Jewish mongrelized and inbred DNA?) to live there. But no serious human being can take this seriously or even consider it to be reasonable. Imagine Brazilians, Puerto Ricans, Mestizos, and other mongrels forcing immigrants to take DNA-tests to prove that they are “racially pure”. How the fuck do you even do that? Do you need to have less Negro blood than the average mongrel, or do you need to be lighter than the average mongrel? Nobody takes this seriously (not even the mongrelized Jews do this themselves, I think). Israel is a multicultural land with all kinds of people, ranging from light European-looking people, to Indians, Lembas, Arabs, Asians, and converts. A black woman even won the prize of “miss Israel” som years ago, https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/first-black-miss-israel-im-not-ashamed-to-say-there-is-racis?utm_term=.lbPOanKM5#.unb1rax2B

    This is the Jewish “ethnostate” you are talking about.

    “Also–in case you haven’t noticed–both Jew awareness and popularity of the far right are at the highest levels in decades. But many of these same Jew aware rightists are advocating “learning from Israel” and copying their blueprint for an ethnostate in order to apply it in their “white” nations.”

    What organizations? You mean AmRen and the Counter-Jihadists? Or you mean David Duke (who actually collaborates with muslims and other non-Whites “against Jews”) and his ethnopluralist ilk who claim that Jews are the ultimate racists? You have to specify what you’re talking about here because I have never heard this being advocated in WN-circles (I’m not WN myself though).

    “The creation of other ethnostates would actually make Israel’s existence more secure. Why do you think Israel was great friends with apartheid South Africa? Right now, Israel can be singled out for criticism as the world’s only ethnostate; but if other countries follow suit, Israel can say “don’t blame us, everyone else is doing it too!”… Jews are not scared of others having ethnostates.”

    Jews thrive in multicultural areas like New York, Los Angeles, etc, so I don’t think that Jews would feel more secure in a homogeneous White area where they are visible and will more likely suffer persecution as in the good ol’ days. Jews even thrive 10 times more in muslim Arab cultures than in White European Christian countries.

    Jews will virtually support anything as long as they can benefit from it. Jews support Ukrainian ne-Nazis in Ukraine because they are advancing their agenda. Jews supported Hitler for some time when he collaborated with them for a shortwhile regarding the creation of a new “Israel” (which obviously failed). Jews supported the Soviet Union until Stalin turned his back on them and became anti-Zionist. Jews supported South-Africa because South-Africa offered them help, collaborations, nuclear-deals, and other things from the very beginning. They (Israel) “supported” them in the way that they themselves benefited tremendeously from it (why would they say no to nuclear-weapons and other things of the same stock?).

    Many Jews are ashamed of this today and later of course the Jews backstabbed South-Africa and conned them. Communist Jews were ultimately the main prepetrators in overthrowing Apartheid and making South-Africa into the anti-White, genocidal, superstitous shithole it is today. After South-africa had helped them with almost everything they backstabbed them in the ultimate Jewish way making the country into a shithole.

    Communist Jews like Arthur Goldreich, Rusty Bernstein, Dennis Goldberg, Bob Hepple, Dr Hilliard Festenstein, Harold Wolpe, Joe Slovo, Helen Suzman, Isie Maisels, Albie Sachs, Sydney Kentridge, Wolfie Kodesh, Jock Isacowitz, Jack Hodgson, Rusty Bernsein, Cecil Williams, Sailor Malan, Kane Berman, Abner Weiss, Fonda Dubb, Bertha Beinashowitz, and many, many, many more Jews were the key people in overthrowing Apartheid,

    “While Afrikaans newspapers frequently accused the Jews of subverting the apartheid regime, pointing to the high percentage of Jews among the whites detained by the police, the Afrikaans newspaper Die Burger in a two-part series, praised the Muslim community for its cooperation. It said: “Moderate Muslim theologians (geestelikes) in the Peninsula are of the opinion that not even civil disobedience is permissible for the Muslim minority in South Africa where they are to obey the law and are under obligation to negotiate if they consider the political system to be unjust or oppressive.””

    “At Slovo’s funeral in 1995, President Mandela said of him

    “We are assembled to mourn the passing of a leader, a patriot, a father, a fighter, a negotiator, an internationalist, a theoretician and an organizer. Indeed, it is the combination of all these qualities so splendidly in one individual, which made Comrade Joe Slovo the great African revolutionary that he was.

    When, in 1934, the village of Obelkei in Lithuania, bequeathed to South Africa an eight-year-old Yossel Mashel Slovo, there was no predetermined course that his life would follow. Forced to leave school at an early age because of poverty; part of the passionate political debates of that period among immigrants in Johannesburg; – all these factors helped mould one of the greatest South African and African revolutionaries of our times.”

    “12 Jews honored on African stamps as Apartheid fighters

    This stamp issue acknowledges the extraordinary sacrifices made by Jews to the liberation of their African brethren.”

    At least the South-African Negroes are extremely happy and honouring these Jews who turned South-Africa into the squalor it is today. Thank you Jews.

    “I might actually move to Detroit or a nearby city in the future:”

    Yeah, why not? They have fine, hrmm, Aryan houses and all that…

  18. Numinous Sun says:

    @Jason:

    Dude, I’ve heard this same argument over and over and over in the Jewish press, media, movies, documentaries, politicians, etc almost daily all of my life. It’s like the ultimate Jewish and leftist lie that they preach to justify the mongrelization of Europe by millions of criminal low-trash invaders.

    Dude, more false equivalency. If you are proven wrong, and are in fact wrong, then you are wrong. Simple! Relativism, which you seem to adhere to, is actually the ULTIMATE “Jewish and leftist lie”…

    “Today there seems to be only one absolute thing: relativism.” – Joseph Goebbels

    By stating anything that disagrees with your Christian Identity\”white” identitarian world view as being a “Jewish lie”, you are actually showing that you yourself have been fully Judaised, and you don’t have the moral or ethical compass to guide you away from the enticements of the Jewish lie. You also prove, by believing that every thing Jews say is untrue, that you have fallen for the biggest Jewish lie of them all!

    I suspect if a Jew told you not to jump off a cliff, you would jump off a cliff. See how that works, it’s called a ‘reverse bluff’. You truly are an idiot if you believe that Jews aren’t aware that right-wing reactionaries such as yourself believe that ‘everything a Jew says is a lie’. That is why Jewry is able to manipulate people like you as easy as it does.

    I think what you fail to also realize Jason, not surprisingly considering you haven’t read much of the main site, that the process of Aryanization will effectively divide the world into two main factions, non-Aryan versus Aryan, at which point we will have not only won our battles, but also the war.

  19. Pandorastop says:

    @ Jason

    “Is that also true for Jews? There are some nice Jews out there who want to help humanity.”

    Haha, you think Jews are human(s). Are you a stand-up comic? What else, what else do you have in your act?

  20. Pandorastop says:

    @Jason

    Are you a ‘humanist’ ?

  21. Pandorastop says:

    @Jason

    I find it sort of disturbing that you rant so much about ‘negroes’ on an NS site. Even the official, allied-line, was pretty clear that “Hitler was ambiguous to ‘negroes’.”

    And yet, here you are talking about ‘good Jews’… Show me a page from the NS library that talked about ‘good Jews’ without irony or indignation.

    “…the personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew.” – Adolf Hitler.

    Did you see ‘negro’ ‘arab’ ‘caucasian’ ‘native american’ ‘asian’ et al; in that sentence?

    What is your obsession with ‘blacks’? Do you have a small dick or something?

  22. Pandorastop says:

    @ BoardOwner

    Did you delete your 8chan image board?

    If not, it looks like it has been deleted.

  23. Board owner says:

    The board is still up for me. Just test posted too and it went through. I’ll look into it, wouldn’t put it past them to shut it down in some way.

  24. Jason says:

    “Which means that whatever lifestyle the post-intermarriage Canaanites had could just as easily have been of Sethite origin as Cainite. Which means the only way to find out what the Sethite lifestyle is to exclude the Cainite influence by looking at the pre-intermarriage Sethites (e.g. Noah) as well as the Sethites who did not intermarry ie. the Israelites (e.g. Jacob). The answer is that they were herders.”

    Cain is never mentioned in the genealogy of the “generations of Adam”. Noah and his offspring were spared in the [local] flood because they were “perfect in their generations” (which means race/blood). The Sethites who had intermarried with the “fallen angels” were wiped out in the [local] flood. Cain was mixed and the Canaanites who mixed with him from the very beginning (they were not wiped out in the flood).

    Som according to the Bible, the Israelites (certainly after the local flood) were racially pure, while the Canaanites had intermarried with each other.

    They were agrarians who both lived off crops and cattle.

    “Because Paul edited what you are reading.”

    But the mainstream version (by both anti-Christian White Nationalists and mainstream Christians) is that Paul was the first universalist who wanted to evangelize the whole “gentile world” (by purposely mistranslating his words). You’re telling me the opposite is true, and that he was in fact a racist who only wanted to convert “divorced” Israelites? In that case you’re right, but every Christian seems to have missed that…

    And you mean that Paul edited everyone of the apostles letters and influenced them where they should convert people too? Because the conversion of non-Israelites started several centuries later…

    “The point is that blood transfusion is possible between individuals of different ethnicities, nor is blood transfusion always possible between individuals of the same ethnicity, therefore ethnicity is not what matters.”

    Blood transfusion is therefore not a strong argument for immigration or against the importance of race. When it comes to organ transplants it’s even more tricky.

    “In other words it is not zero, therefore ethnicity is not what matters.”

    But it’s HARDER for blacks to find White people of the same blood type ON AVERAGE. Therefore race is – on average – just an obstruction and problematic.

    “Wrong. Anyone born of Jewish parents who is nice will refuse to self-identify as a Jew. This is the point. Jews chose to CALL THEMSELVES Jews. “Whites” chose to CALL THEMSELVES “whites”. Goys and “non-whites”, in contrast, never called themselves Goys and “non-whites” until Jews and “whites” started CALLING THEM Goys and “non-whites” first.”

    Every Jew is a Jew because he is tainted with jewish mongrelized DNA. You can’t “self-identify” as a Jew, that’s bullocks. Jews always act on their genes when they’re doing what they’re doing. Likewise, Mestizos self-identify (and should always) as mestizos. You are what you are and can’t change that.

    Nobody chooses anything, that’s just how nature works. A cat can never become a deer, and a deer can never become a cat. They don’t “self-indetify” themselves as cats and deers, they are identified differently because they are different species of animals.

    Whites call non-Whites “non-White” because they are different racially, culturally, and are lower developed. Jews call us non-Jews “goys” because we are, well, not Jewish. Mongrel Jews having a word for non-Jews to make themselves “superior” is just laughable (Goyim in original Hebrew just means “people”).

    “It says that they have no enthusiasm for working for that country. The whole point of migration is to allow people to find a country that they can be enthusiastic about working for.”

    Yeah, because low-skilled third worlders who are not even welcomed back to their own shit-filled countries would be “enthusiastic” to work in their luxurious host country where they get daily free meals, housing, welfare, sexually liberated White women without veils, modern technology, medicine, and clothes. Why would they be interested in scrubbing toilets or washing dishes (basically what they qualify for) when they can get everything for free or thrive through a criminal lifestyle? Why travel the whole world when Saudi-Arabia and other rich Arab countries are in need of workers? Northern and Central Europe is filled to the brim and a large percentage of the natives are unemployed because of a shortage of jobs.

    “I highly doubt you have personally met every individual who lived in the Third Reich.”

    The burden of proof in showing even one mongrel (not counting the mischlings) as a racial ideal for germans in the propaganda is on you.

    “Just check the bibliography of her books, you moron.”

    Yes, but I need som sources outside of her books that can confirm what she’s saying, not just her “spurious” quotes without anything to confirm them. Do you get it? Just wanted to know if you had any.

    “I already posted these links above:

    “http://chartsbin.com/view/12730

    http://chartsbin.com/view/1491

    Are intensive meat/dairy/egg/fur/etc. factories African inventions? Is trawling an African invention? Are vivisection, medical/cosmetic/etc. testing and other laboratory experimentation on animals African inventions? Are circuses, baiting, etc. African inventions? Are you fucking kidding me?!

    If we magically made Africa vanish 600 years ago, it would have made negligible difference to the total accumulated animal suffering by today. If we magically made Europe vanish 600 years ago, total accumulated animal suffering by today would not even be a trillionth of what it has actually been.”

    Yes, but that’s mainly for food and clothing. I agree that this a huge problem in the Western capitalistic world, but you are comparing apples to oranges here. Killing dogs and monkeys in Voodoo rituals, torturing them, etc, it to me more cruel than to kill animals for either food or clothing. But you have got a point and that’s why many WHITE people are protesting the treatment of animals. We even have the jewish monsanto corporation with their GMO foods filling the animals with their hormones and filth.

    Africans could never invent any of those things because they have not got the intelligence for it nor would know how to use it (intelligence can be used either for good or bad things). But at the same time the average African would not give a fuck about “animal rights” (as evidenced by their consumption of endangered monkeys, gorillas, etc). They even keep endangered monkeys etc as “pets” in chains and treat them horribly. In the West we are at least loving to our pets.

    I we made Africa vanish many diseases there du to eating endangered monkeys and apes would vanish. The horrible treatment of animals there would vanish too.

    You’re forgetting how the gooks treat animals too. Here they slaughtered (millions?) of pigs in South Korea by burying them alive, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J3EkZ5MKPE

    This is definately animal cruelty.

    “Even some of your fellow far-rightists agree with us:”

    They are retarded AmRen-folks. Don’t take them seriously.

    “Dawkins is a Jew and promotes Islamophobia.”

    He is non-Jewish but a retarded “New Atheist” who only hates Islam (and religion in general/Christianity) as Geert Wilders does, yes.

    “You sound like Trump saying: “Nobody respects women more than I do.”

    “Respect” is not the same as approve or like. I respect them by not interfering in their culture or forcing them to stop eating dogs and cats. Get it?

    “ZC or BS. Either will do.”

    I don’t even know what “BS” is (bullshit?), but the racists and Counter-Jihadists are totally opposed to each other. The Counter-Jihadists want immigration, mongrelization and secularism… The racists want the opposite. Jews promote the Counter-Jihadists, not the racists.

    “The Hindu far-right in India has been promoting Islamophobia for a long time. Savitri Devi saw it even back in her time, and opposed it:”

    Like I care about Indian mongrels opposing Pakistani mongrels. It’s totally irrelevant and I couldn’t care less. Savitri Devi was a whacky race-mixer and degenerate.

    “In order to trigger the backlash.”

    The Counter-Jihad backlash.

    That would only make the problems worse…

  25. Pandorastop says:

    @Jason,

    So… yes on the small pecker thing?

  26. AS says:

    @Jason

    “the Israelites (certainly after the local flood) were racially pure, while the Canaanites had intermarried with each other.”

    Yes, the Israelites were pure Sethites (Turanian), whereas the Canaanites were Cainite (Aryan) and Sethite (Turanian) mixes.

    “Paul was the first universalist”

    Paul was a humanist who excluded non-humans from ethical consideration. The apocryphal Gospel of the Holy Twelve, for example, includes descriptions of Jesus teaching universalism, but similar content is totally absent from all the canonical Gospels. Who do you think edited it out?

    “Yea, I am in all creatures and all creatures are in me. In all their joys I rejoice, and in all their afflictions I am afflicted.” – Jesus

    “You’re telling me the opposite is true, and that he was in fact a racist who only wanted to convert “divorced” Israelites?”

    He was setting up a false dichotomy of Israelitism vs humanism so as to cover the truth that Christianity teaches universalism. It worked so well that many even use the term “universalism” to mean humanism, as you just did above.

    “the conversion of non-Israelites started several centuries later…”

    False. Jesus himself had Roman followers, such as the Centurion of Capernaum (of whom Jesus said: “I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith”) as well as Claudia Procula.

    “But it’s HARDER for blacks to find White people of the same blood type ON AVERAGE.”

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

    “You can’t “self-identify””

    You have been self-identifying as an Israelite throughout the entire discussion.

    “Why would they be interested in scrubbing toilets or washing dishes (basically what they qualify for) when they can get everything for free”

    Our policy proposal all along has been to end welfare and offer public works projects instead. You would know this if you had bothered to read up.

    “Why travel the whole world when Saudi-Arabia and other rich Arab countries are in need of workers? Northern and Central Europe is filled to the brim and a large percentage of the natives are unemployed because of a shortage of jobs.”

    In that case, the Northern/Central Europe native unemployed could supply Saudi Arabia etc. with its needed workers, but I don’t see you encouraging that.

    “The burden of proof in showing even one mongrel (not counting the mischlings) as a racial ideal for germans in the propaganda is on you.”

    I’m not the one using the term “mongrel” in the first place.

    “I need som sources outside of her books that can confirm what she’s saying”

    That’s what a bibliography IS, you moron.

    @Pandorastop

    Jason totally deserves to be insulted, but a small penis is low sexual dimorphism, therefore would be a compliment in our worldview.

  27. Board owner says:

    If a small dick accusation is a compliment, is a big one an insult? I can’t see that working. ‘Your dick is so big, you are TOO manly’ bearing in mind they probably want high sexual dimorphism.

    Now I have another feature that is apparently not Aryan enough as well, fml

  28. AS says:

    @BO

    When we insult an enemy, we are not so much trying to offend the enemy himself as to get our spectators to despise him. Have you not noticed how it is already the case that leftists and rightists insult each other in opposite ways? For example, when leftists parody how rightists talk, they typically use lower-pitched voices, whereas when rightists parody how leftists talk, they typically use higher-pitched voices. This is part of the same contrast that I am talking about. So yes, accusing a male of having a big dick would indeed be an insult in the world that we are trying to create. How could it be otherwise? And sure, for now, it won’t work outside of our own turf. But proudly practicing it on our own turf and letting visitors see us do it is the only way to gather the like-minded, which is what we are here to do. If we compromise by adopting the enemy’s insults, it will only confuse visitors, and ultimately even corrupt our own thinking.

    “Rabbi Johanan said the penis of Rabbi Ishmael was as large as a six-kab wineskin; according to others, three kabs. The penis of Rabbi Papa was as large as one of the baskets of the inhabitants of Harpania. The highminded competitive zeal of the three old rabbis could knock an unprepared person off his chair.” – Dietrich Eckart

    For the purpose of information, the penis comes from the lateral mesoderm:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genital_tubercle

    and its size is positively correlated with testosterone levels during puberty.

  29. Jason says:

    “Yes, the Israelites were pure Sethites (Turanian), whereas the Canaanites were Cainite (Aryan) and Sethite (Turanian) mixes.”

    Yes. And later Esau created an even more mixed population when he intermarried with different Canaanited tribes (the Edomites).

    “Paul was a humanist who excluded non-humans from ethical consideration. The apocryphal Gospel of the Holy Twelve, for example, includes descriptions of Jesus teaching universalism, but similar content is totally absent from all the canonical Gospels. Who do you think edited it out?”

    Going by the letters he wrote and the people he evangelized, he certainly was only preaching to fellow Israelites (especially “gentiles” who had been divorced from the covenants).

    The apocryphal gospels are Jewish perversions that came out of the Alexandrian Halakha schools. They were infested with Talmudic Jews…

    “He was setting up a false dichotomy of Israelitism vs humanism so as to cover the truth that Christianity teaches universalism. It worked so well that you many even use the term “universalism” to mean humanism, as you just did above.”

    Jesus, Paul and the apostles preached only to Israel. They were small in numbers and “scattered” all throughout certain countries. I’ve already proven this with multiple verses, but can bring up many more if you want me to.

    “False. Jesus himself had Roman followers, such as the Centurion of Capernaum (of whom Jesus said: “I have not found anyone in Israel with such great faith”) as well as Claudia Procula.”

    It is evident through historical research and researchers that Israelites were in fact often a part of the Roman or Greek Army. Many of these were the “divorced” whom Yahweh had counted as “not his people, but “Lo-Ammi” – in Hosea,

    “And the LORD said, “Name him Lo-ammi–’Not my people’–for [the House of] Israel is not my people, and I am not their God.” (Hosea 1:9)

    They were divorced from the covenants, but Jesus came to bring them in again (this was his mission). They did not circumcize themselves or follow Hebrew laws, they were assimilated into the Greek, Scythian, Roman, etc culture. This has been historically verified by SECULAR researchers like Bruce Malina and John J. Pilch. They were considered to be “unclean” and “gentiles” (the Samaritans too, even though they descended from Jakob Israel). But Jesus mission was to restore the relationship with them again through bringing them into the “new covenant” (the House of Israel were divorced, not the House of Judah).

    Notice that Jesus says directly after having healed his slave that his God is the racial God of,

    Matthew 8:11
    “I say to you that many will come from the east and the west to share the banquet with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven”

    “You have been self-identifying as an Israelite throughout the entire discussion.”

    I’ve never done that. The Israelites were small tribes (remember that they were SCATTERED throughout the nations) and it’s impossible to know.

    “Our policy proposal all along has been to end welfare and offer public works projects instead. You would know this if you had bothered to read up.”

    Yes, but it would still be miles better to support yourself through criminality or other illicit activities in Europe because there’s a higher living-standard and more good-looking women. They would still flock here.

    “In that case, the Northern/Central Europe native unemployed could supply Saudi Arabia etc. with its needed workers, but I don’t see you encouraging that.”

    If Saudi-Arabia asked for them? But it’s quite a distance to travel. It would be more appropriate for the Arabs to immigrate to a local culture with a good economy and help their Arab neighbors instead of traveling through dangerous oceans and paths to Europe… If work was their only motivation they wouldn’t spend tens of thousands of dollars just to come to Central/Northern Europe. If you want work or shelter you immigrate to the nearest country (just like the kids who want work do in Scandinavia, and the Germans and the British, etc).

    Low-skilled mongrels from the third world without any education aren’t usually that hot on the working market either.

    “That’s what a bibliography IS, you moron.”

    What? Unless you can’t back up your assertions with sources there is nothing to confirm them. Do you have any or not?

    “Jason totally deserves to be insulted, but a small penis is low sexual dimorphism, therefore would be a compliment in our worldview.”

    Now this is getting weird..

  30. Jason says:

    @Pandorastop

    “So… yes on the small pecker thing?”

    Don’t project your own black penis fetish on me. There are websites and all that for people who like that stuff. Go there and discuss black and small penises…

    Discussing dicks here is rather inappropriate in my opinion.

  31. Pandorastop says:

    @AS

    Jason is not an enemy. He is nothing but my fool. Draped in a decrepit soul…

    With a small pecker.

  32. Pandorastop says:

    @Jason

    “Discussing dicks here is rather inappropriate in my opinion.”

    Why? Because your Jew-book teaches shame and you want to be a Jew? Every man has a dick, every Woman has a vagina. Hell, hermaphrodites have both.

    The organs are not shameful in and of themselves, it is what one does with them that is.

    Any more ‘laws’ you want to refer to you wanna-be Jew?

  33. AS says:

    @Jason

    “Israelites were in fact often a part of the Roman or Greek Army”

    I predicted this response from you. But the point is that Jesus’ words imply that he himself believed the Centurion to be non-Israelite (and did not consider this to be a barrier), which remains true irrespective of the Centurion’s actual ancestry.

    ““I say to you that many will come from the east and the west to share the banquet with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven””

    This line doesn’t appear in Luke, indicating it is a subsequent embellishment. There is a reason for this:

    Matthew more than all the other gospels identifies how his coming to earth was the fulfillment of many Old Testament prophecies.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Matthew#Comparison_with_other_writings

    You are so easy to fool.

    “Yes, but it would still be miles better to support yourself through criminality”

    We also support capital punishment.

    “They would still flock here.”

    We want people to be able to live where they choose.

    “It would be more appropriate for the Arabs to immigrate to a local culture with a good economy and help their Arab neighbors instead of traveling through dangerous oceans and paths to Europe… If work was their only motivation they wouldn’t spend tens of thousands of dollars just to come to Central/Northern Europe. ”

    Let each individual decide for himself where to move to, and for what reasons. The role of a state is to ensure that that those who have freely made the decision to live in its country are welcomed, and that they receive every opportunity to contribute in labour, but that they get nothing except what they earn via their labour. This is National Socialism.

    _____

    NOTE

    I will delete small dick insults by team members in the future. (For clarity, big dick insults and serious racial idealism discussions about sexual organs will remain acceptable.)

  34. Jason says:

    “I predicted this response from you. But the point is that Jesus’ words imply that he himself believed the Centurion to be non-Israelite (and did not consider this to be a barrier), which remains true irrespective of the Centurion’s actual ancestry.”

    No. The situation regarding the Samaritan woman is the same and can also be used to demonstrate the tensions between the “Judeans” and the “ethnos” (“gentiles”/”Nations”),

    “The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew (more correctly “Judean”) and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.” John 4:9

    What geographical area you came from, or whether you were one of the dispersed “divorced” Israelites was very important to the Israelites during the time of Jesus. The “divorced” Israelites were scattered and assimilated, whereas the Judeans (mainly Israelites from the tribe of Judah, which Jesus himself came from) followed all the laws concerning circumcision, etc.

    Here we learn later in the passage that the “Samaritan” woman considered herself and her people to be descended from Jakob Israel,

    ““Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? Are you greater than OUR FATHER JACOB, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”
    John 4:11-12

    You see? She considered herself and her people to be descendants of Jacob, but she was still considered to be “unclean” by the Judeans.

    The same thing happened to the “other” Roman Centurion Cornelius who was one of the first non-Judean “gentile” Israelites to be converted to the faith.

    “This line doesn’t appear in Luke, indicating it is a subsequent embellishment. There is a reason for this:

    Matthew more than all the other gospels identifies how his coming to earth was the fulfillment of many Old Testament prophecies. ”

    And the circumcision passage is not included in Matthew… but it’s included in the gospel of Luke. So much for Matthews “Old testament obsession”.

  35. AS says:

    “No. The situation regarding the Samaritan woman is the same”

    You are changing the subject deliberately.

    “What geographical area you came from, or whether you were one of the dispersed “divorced” Israelites was very important to the Israelites during the time of Jesus.”

    You also demonstrate your refusal to see Jesus as an individual, just as you refuse to see refugees as individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>