One issue currently being hotly debated across political blogs and forums is that of how to treat refugees seeking asylum. And, as we have come to expect, leftists simply are not arriving at the debate with the necessary toolkit to win. They know clearly in their hearts that the rightists are bad people, but they cannot effectively articulate why, because they are stuck with False Left foundations which, as we have said before, were designed (by Zionist agents) to be beaten down by far-right counterarguments (ie. Israeli policies, which Israel wants other countries to adopt so that Israel can no longer be singled out for moral condemnation for such policies). This is where we – and I hope especially Ossendowski with his upcoming new project – come in: to supply leftists with the True Left toolkit with which they could easily recover a winning position if they are willing to rapidly switch bases from False Left to True Left.
We all know the far-right popular fantasies regarding refugees (a.k.a. the Katie Hopkins Position, just so we are under no illusion as regards the intellectual calibre of the enemy): sink the boats with torpedoes, or variants thereof (put the refugees on planes and throw them out in midair, poison their food/water, shoot them with machine guns (using bullets coated with lard if the refugees are Muslims), impale them like Dracula used to do, etc.). They set this up so that when their own far-right politicians then recommend ’merely’ ignoring all asylum applications and flatly deporting refugees, or even deporting those whose asylum applications were already approved, but without endorsing the additional sadism of their voters, they appear “moderate” in comparison, which then fools ignorant fence-sitters to vote for them. This is the trick of offering a fake middle-ground that we have discussed in the past.
In response to this, all the False Left teaches leftists to do is endlessly bring up “human rights” as a reason for accepting refugees. The problem is, “human rights” is not an argument. “Human rights” is merely a formal abstraction that various organizations around the world have declared that they will observe in their decision-making process. Repeating the term “human rights” over and over again does not convince those who do not believe in “human rights” to suddenly start believing in them. It just produces the image that the repeaters lack actual pro-asylum arguments. If you are a pro-asylum leftist, the single best thing you can do is stop believing in the idiotic notion of “human rights” yourself and go back to ideological basics instead. This is what the True Left is trying to help you to do. The True Left is not, and will never be, about “rights”. The True Left is, and will always be, about empathy.
The first thing we recommend is to mentally place ourselves in the position of the refugees. If we were refugees fleeing from war/famine/disaster/etc. in our origin country, how would we hope our first-choice destination country treats us? This, then, is how we should similarly hope our country treats refugees from another country, for as we would hope others treat us, so should we strive to treat others. It is really that simple, and this used to be common sense among ordinary youth as recently as the 90s, before 9/11 changed the mentality of the world. Yet here already is an argument for the leftist arsenal much more effective than any amount of blathering about “human rights”: challenge rightists to explain WHAT IS WRONG WITH treating others as we would hope to be treated by others.
The empathic approach does not stop here. We can further challenge rightists to place themselves in the position of the refugees under the policies they themselves demand. Among those rightists who recommend torpedoing the refugee boats, for example, how many would still favour this response if they themselves were the ones in the boats? This reminds me of a private discussion I had with Miecz some time ago about a thought experiment in which we invite people to come up with policies for a society that they will have to live in for the rest of their lives, while these people are given no knowledge of the position that they themselves will occupy within that society, which hence forces even ordinarily selfish people to recommend policies not based on self-interest but from considering what is fair. Rightists advocate cruel policies towards tribal outgroups because they know in advance that they themselves won’t be the ones on the receiving end of such cruelty. When nobody is allowed to know who will be on the receiving end of whatever cruelty is advocated, support for rightism drops like a rock, which demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of rightism. In contrast, leftist policies stay largely unaffected by possession or non-possession of knowledge about who will be on the receiving end, which demonstrates the moral strength of leftism.
Many rightists try to take the offensive by claiming that it is the refugees themselves who are in the wrong by staying in the countries offering them asylum instead of returning to live in the countries they fled from. But once again we can apply the empathic approach: how many of these rightists would themselves be willing to go and live in those countries that the refugees are fleeing from? And if they would not, then why would they demand the refugees to be any more willing than themselves to do so? The funny thing is that the rightists spend most of their own propaganda telling their audiences about what “unsalvageable hellholes” these countries are, far too dangerous to even vacation in, let alone live in. How then can they with a straight face blame the refugees for basically agreeing with them, and hence fleeing? I can guarantee that if the rightists had been born in these countries, every single one of them would be doing exactly the same as the current refugees. I moreover challenge every rightist who arrogantly tells refugees to “Go back and improve your own countries!” to personally emigrate to one of these countries and give a demo of themselves achieving this. When they are successful, then we might start taking them seriously. Not until then. (In reality, it is leftists who travel to disaster-hit countries to do volunteer work. In other words, we are the ones who actually do what the rightists tell the refugees to do while never doing it themselves.)
But we can talk about rightist inferiority and leftist superiority all day and it won’t make any difference, because the whole refugee crisis is a Zionist conspiracy designed to make racism mainstream, and hence facilitate the pre-scripted shift from PC to ZC. And this is something that can also be deduced by the empathic approach: how would we feel as taxpayers to see successful asylum applicants – who have never paid into the welfare system - instantly becoming welfare recipients? We would feel robbed, and justly so. But this absolutely does not mean that refugees should not be given asylum, as Jews are herding us to think. What it means is that refugees should not be eligible for welfare. If refugees need asylum, give it to them, but then simply make sure they pull their own weight by assigning all of them who are unable to find private-sector employment a sufficient schedule of compulsory state-organized labour to more than offset their living expenses. This not only makes it fair for taxpayers, but gives the refugees themselves respectability as contributing members of society (and hence worthy of citizenship eventually), and makes negativity towards them indefensible. This is authentic National Socialism: empathy for refugees (which ZC/BS lacks) and at the same time empathy for taxpayers (which PC lacks) – positive asylum.
National Socialism is thus able to provide an exact answer to the question of how many refugees a country has a duty to take in. The answer is: at least as many as the state can put to work (plus however many can be supported via voluntary charity funding). In practice, this would be a larger number than what most refugee destination countries are currently taking in, because their calculations are based on welfare capacity instead of labour capacity, because they patronizingly view refugees by default as permanent dependents, rather than as we empathically view them – just as we would wish to be viewed by our destination country if we were refugees - as future citizens.
http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/immigration/
(Incidentally, any country which applies our principle and hence harnesses the potentially vast value of state-organized refugee labour would gain an economic and military edge both over countries which put refugees on welfare and (though to a lesser extent) over countries which refuse to accept refugees at all in the first place. So not only National Socialists but even authentic fascists should support positive asylum.)
Treating others as we would wish to be treated by others has been taught by all universalist religions around the world. Meanwhile, a rightist is, in essence, someone who considers Katie Hopkins to be a better person than Jesus (for example). And the rightist calls this “taking the Red Pill”…..
Bonus song:
Thank you for writing this. I always see rightist propaganda on my newsfeed and this is like fresh air.
As you pointed out, the whole issue of asylum is very big at the moment, for certain in Australia. I’m thankful for the clarity of what you wrote, and the moral ground we must stand on in presenting our position according to empathy. We will definitely be incorporating these concepts into our platform for our Australian Movement. I think it will help to galvanise those on the left, possibly helping to draw others to our Movement.
Really useful article.
Is the thought experiment a reference to this? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_position
The hypothetical starting point seems the same, however…
“forces even ordinarily selfish people to recommend policies not based on self-interest but from considering what is fair”
I do not think this is true at all. It depends on the moral inclination and quality of each subject.
“Rawls also argues that the representatives in the original position would adopt the maximin rule [...]
maximizing the minimum, i.e., making the choice that produces the highest payoff for the least advantaged position.”
“[... ]under original position, people will be risk averse. This implies that everyone is afraid of being part of the poor members of society”
This doesn’t semm “fair” to me. It’s more like opportunism and cowardice.
(sorry for the double post, I accidentally submitted an unfinished one)..
@LOZ & Isaac
Here are some pictures of Generation Katie Hopkins attempting to intimidate refugees:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-kgvItGnOdLU/VX3wk6x1ZhI/AAAAAAAAI0c/SFoxk1rx3Vw/s1600/gi1.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-83tS1ZwS9Lo/VX3wkp25Q4I/AAAAAAAAI0Y/CnQ_9Z_7L8s/s1600/gi2.jpg
It’s one thing to make fun of them online, but just making fun of them online isn’t going to stop them. The only thing that will stop them is readiness to confront them physically. We must turn up wherever they turn up, and we must NOT be the ones to start a fight, but we must let them know that if they start attacking refugees, we will make them regret it. We need every Aryanist and otherwise anti-Zionist/True Leftist training in hand-to-hand combat skills. Every one of us must train until we are able to look at the photos above and feel confident enough to singlehandedly fight the entire group of them if need be. Not necessarily winning outright, but certainly able to do enough damage before we go down ourselves as to make it worthwhile. Of course, better yet, we turn up in a paramilitary squad of similar or greater numbers. Again I repeat, WE MUST NOT BE THE ONES TO START A FIGHT. I am only describing what must happen if they start attacking the innocent.
By the way, Isaac, notice that the banner used in the photos above is based on the Australian government precedent:
http://www.irishcentral.com/opinion/cahirodoherty/Australian-governments-anti-immigrant-poster-shocks-planet-VIDEO.html
@MS
“This doesn’t semm “fair” to me. It’s more like opportunism and cowardice.”
I don’t think maximin applies across all issues. For example, many people would still recommend harsh punishment for crime. In general, they are more likely to be non-maximin on issues where payoff is determined by the choices one makes, and maximin on issues where payoff is determined by factors over which one was never given a choice. This reminds me of Hitler’s quote: “Bolshevism preaches international class conflict … National Socialism aims at bridging over and equalizing unfavourable contrasts in social life, and in uniting the whole population in collaborative work.” People under this experiment would be unlikely to support Bolshevism, because they cannot be sure they would not be born into a bourgeois background (which would be actively persecuted under Bolshevism). They would be likely to support National Socialism, on the other hand, which advocates maximin between subgroups within society, and only cares that everyone is contributing and unifying (something which each person can choose to do or not).
Of course you are welcome to describe what you would consider to be fairer.
Also, here is stuff for your blog:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-12138404
http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/society/article/riace-calabria-where-immigrants-are-welcome.html
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/dateline/story/welcome-riace-town-wants-more-immigrants
http://www.citylab.com/housing/2014/03/changing-face-italy-seen-one-small-town/8611/
http://eng.babelmed.net/dossier/114-italia/13194-riace-from-ghost-to-host-town.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPj1jcAwxgU
Riace uses its own currency:
http://ccmag.net/riace-immigration
Please spread the story of Riace as widely as possible in order to inspire people across Italy to start similar initiatives in their own towns. If all of Italy can follow the example of Riace, then perhaps all of the EU will then follow the example of Italy.
Also, see if you can contact Lucano and offer him your support, and if possible get him to join your group.
http://www.citymayors.com/mayors/riace-mayor-lucano.html
@ AS
Yes, martial arts are very important for anti-Zionists. Hitler recommended learning boxing and jiu-jitsu in Mein Kampf.
Italy should quit the Eurozone asap and make the new Italian Lira a fiat currency.
“And Jehovah said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: am I my brother’s keeper?”
(Genesis 4:9)
Can leftists place themselves into the position of Cain who was blamed by Jehovah for not looking after his brother with whom he was in disagreement with, or is Jehovah the only character in this story whose morals resonate with the left?
The rightists have made no covenant to travel to disaster-hit countries to do volunteer work and the result of their inaction is equal to leftist endeavors to do the opposite. Until the elected rightists along with the sufferers of disaster-hit countries see some result of leftist work in those countries how are we to take leftists seriously and support whatever agenda they try to force upon the more successful countries?
The elected rightists do not harm the refugees in any way and they are empathic enough toward them to condemn the leftist plan to reduce the immigrants to state slave laborers. If black slavery was morally wrong for all those who participated in it like African authorities (African state?) who sold slaves, Jewish traders who traded slaves and Europeans who owned slaves, than how can it be right for the left to initiate the same practice allover again? You lack moral consistency. If leftists are morally superior to Gentiles and Israelis than they ought to be held more accountable for their failure to live up to their stated principles, not less.
There is nothing wrong with treating others as we would hope to be treated by others and that’s precisely what the elected rightists do when they ignore all asylum applications. The elected rightists can place themselves into the position of refugees and hope not to be hurt in the hypothetical situation of being forced to seek refuge in other countries but instead ignored or politely rejected. It really makes no sense for the rightists of the mob to blame the refugees for fleeing from their countries but it makes all the sense in the world to seek revenge from the left for demanding to act as “brother’s keepers”. Jesus and other religious authorities really commanded “bother’s keeper” mentality as you hinted. But not all of us made the willing covenant with any such religious figure or with Hitler. Endowed with free will the wise and the brave can reject them all, regardless of the consequences.
@AS
“I don’t think maximin applies across all issues. For example, many people would still recommend harsh punishment for crime. In general, they are more likely to be non-maximin on issues where payoff is determined by the choices one makes, and maximin on issues where payoff is determined by factors over which one was never given a choice.”
You’re probably right.
This experiment is probably useful when arguing about certain issues (like immigration and refugees); my fear was that it might be detrimental when used in other contexts.
Thanks for the links. I’ll see what I can do.
“This reminds me of a private discussion I had with Miecz some time ago about a thought experiment in which we invite people to come up with policies for a society that they will have to live in for the rest of their lives, while these people are given no knowledge of the position that they themselves will occupy within that society…”
I tried to have this discussion with others and so many people said something that can be summed up as “democracy because of fairness and social mobility.”
“If refugees need asylum, give it to them, but then simply make sure they pull their own weight by assigning all of them who are unable to find private-sector employment a sufficient schedule of compulsory state-organized labour to more than offset their living expenses. This not only makes it fair for taxpayers, but gives the refugees themselves respectability as contributing members of society (and hence worthy of citizenship eventually), and makes negativity towards them indefensible. This is authentic National Socialism: empathy for refugees (which ZC/BS lacks) and at the same time empathy for taxpayers (which PC lacks) – *positive asylum*”
I agree wholeheartedly. Best political point that I have read in a long time.
@MS
“Thanks for the links. I’ll see what I can do.”
Actually there is probably much more coverage of Riace in Italian language news sites, which you could try searching for and then adding to your blog also. Make sure you include the official Citta Futura site:
http://www.cittafuturariace.it/it/Attivita/Riace%20Village/
You may wish to consider joining the Citta Futura association as an entryist if possible, or send in someone else from your group as an entryist.
In any case, the main idea is to make Riace something that Italians can feel proud of. There are other refugee hospitality initiatives in other countries also, but only on a much smaller scale:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11473420/German-churches-open-their-doors-to-refugees-under-protection-of-ancient-custom.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1uydEqnp5Y
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/16/oxfam-shop-refugees-swansea-asylum-seekers-eritrea-syria-ukraine
With Riace, it’s an entire community, which is what makes it so inspirational. The town itself has a Saturnian visual feel to it, don’t you think? Nothing pretentious, just a down-to-earth, humble habitat for simple living. This is what we need to encourage appreciation for in tough times like these. Here is another link I found while browsing:
http://urbanpollinators.co.uk/?p=951
By the way, MS, welcome to the team!
@Miecz
Hashtali told me you sent me several emails with attached files over the last few months, which I never received. If you wish, please feel free to share the files via uploading to SoE and then posting links here.
(Doesn’t Riace remind you of New Hammerston?
)
Thanks for the welcome.
The main issue right now, is that I don’t have a group. It’s just myself.
I’ll start looking for members on the net.
The article I’m translating right now is the one on immigration, I’ll make reference to Riace for sure.
As for joining the association itself, I live far away from Riace, I cannot contribute to its projects. The best thing to do would probably be to make Città Futura an italian association not limited to Riace, with local branches in more villages/cities.
To do this we either need political support from local authorities, or people who can start a similar project independently.
“The town itself has a Saturnian visual feel to it, don’t you think? Nothing pretentious, just a down-to-earth, humble habitat for simple living.”
Yes.
Another interesting thing
http://www.comune.riace.rc.it/index.php?action=index&p=76
“Le origini del nome sono da attribuire a un diminutivo del volgare greco-bizantino Ryaki, piccolo ruscello.”
Roughly: the name (Riace) originates from Ryaki, meaning “little river” in vernacular byzantine-greek.
@AS
Here are 5 of the pics I meant to send to you:
https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/grains_1.jpg
https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/grains_2.jpg
https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/bread_1.jpg
https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/egg-substitutes.jpg
https://swordofelysium.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/milk-substitutes.jpg
@MS
“I’ll start looking for members on the net.”
Good luck!
“The article I’m translating right now is the one on immigration, I’ll make reference to Riace for sure.”
I suggest keeping translations separate from Riace coverage in order to avoid confusion. You are using WordPress, so you should be able to create ‘Pages’ as well as ‘Posts’. What would probably be neatest is if all your translations are ‘Pages’ while all your own blogging (including Riace coverage) are ‘Posts’. It’s up to you, though. Discuss layout issues with Hashtali if you want; I’m sure he can offer you further advice.
“The best thing to do would probably be to make Città Futura an italian association not limited to Riace, with local branches in more villages/cities.
To do this we either need political support from local authorities, or people who can start a similar project independently.”
Good idea. Keep us updated on how it goes.
“the name (Riace) originates from Ryaki, meaning “little river””
Excellent.
@Isaac
Stuff for your blog; Langsa sets an example of what all of Oceania could be doing for Rohingya refugees (again it’s local residents themselves providing most of the help):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1hOnKnNHdo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_ClBPwwcG0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZwgssNwz1c
This channel has lots of additional videos:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc2H4DmC5PGixcfVJ11xb4g
@AS Thanks for that! I will work on incorporating this all to our site, including what you mentioned in your comments above. Although I don’t know Italian, I could help MS with his layout. I’ve become pretty familiar with the way the WordPress format works.
>Doesn’t Riace remind you of New Hammerston?
I’m going to watch that from the beginning soon, as I can’t remember where I was up to.
@Miecz
Thanks for the files!
@Frater Pan
I knew this post would attract the Hopkins admirers. Here is a picture of your goddess of “bravery, wisdom and free will”:
http://usvsth3m.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/uktv-katie-hopkins-this-morning-still-2-600×343.jpg
“Can leftists place themselves into the position of Cain who was blamed by Jehovah for not looking after his brother with whom he was in disagreement with, or is Jehovah the only character in this story whose morals resonate with the left?”
I frequently place myself in the position of Cain who killed Abel in solidarity with the sheep because Abel sacrificed sheep to Yahweh/Jehovah. Unlike you, I do not care about Yahweh’s opinion on the issue. Yahweh advocated tribalism: according to Yahweh, Cain should not have killed Abel because Abel was merely sacrificing outgroup people (the sheep), whereas Cain should view Abel as an ingroup person (which is what the term “brother” means in Judaism) and therefore not be concerned about how ingroup people treat outgroup people. This is not how Cain saw it: Cain only saw Abel initiating violence, and responded with Ahimsa.
It is Hopkins who resonates with Yahweh in this respect:
“No, I don’t care. Show me pictures of coffins, show me bodies floating in water, play violins and show me skinny people looking sad. … do I feel pity? Only for the British drivers, who get hit with a fine every time one of this plague of feral humans ends up in their truck.” – Katie Hopkins
http://5pillarsuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/kthop-650×430.jpg
“how are we to take leftists seriously and support whatever agenda they try to force”
We are not the ones using force. We have never forced a single refugee to travel anywhere they do not want to go. We merely support them being allowed to go where they themselves choose to go. The only people using force here are rightists who prevent refugees from doing this.
https://i1.wp.com/i.huffpost.com/gen/1436783/images/o-KATIE-HOPKINS-THIS-MORNING-FAT-CHILDREN-facebook.jpg
“The elected rightists do not harm the refugees in any way”
If X deliberately keeps Y locked in a cage with no food, can X claim to be not harming Y?
http://i.guim.co.uk/static/w-620/h–/q-95/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/8/22/1408723078633/Katie-Hopkins-on-This-Mor-012.jpg
Besides, we all know the elected rightists privately encourage rightist street thugs to actively bully refugees in order to intimidate them into leaving, even while publicly condemning such bullying in the front of the media.
“leftist plan to reduce the immigrants to state slave laborers”
How is it slave labour when it requires the refugees’ own prior consent, and when the refugees can choose to leave at any time, whether to take up private-sector employment, start their own business, or move to another country?
http://www.jewishnews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/THIS-MORNING-MAIN_1806076a.jpg
“There is nothing wrong with treating others as we would hope to be treated by others and that’s precisely what the elected rightists do when they ignore all asylum applications. The elected rightists can place themselves into the position of refugees and hope not to be hurt in the hypothetical situation of being forced to seek refuge in other countries but instead ignored or politely rejected.”
You are trying to tell me that, if you were a refugee, you would hope your asylum application is rejected rather than accepted. In that case, why did you apply for asylum in the first place? (Seriously, this is such utter bullshit that I wonder if you are just Longinus using a different username.)
http://mediastorage-lls.bauermedia.co.uk/20/0f4d0/831c1/4bc3f/0dbbe/a1726/18a1c/katie-hopkins-enters-celebrity-big-brother_940x526.jpg?1420729712
I’ve started work on a post for our site, based on some of what you said above in the Empathy article. I am hoping to break it into a few parts, maybe three, and include some more of the material about the refugees finding help from the locals. Thought to post the link so you could give any suggestions:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clDw7LbWsgh4EpZsz3LDhXErIGJ9q2CXpuUt6He31b8/edit?usp=sharing
Wonderful Post!
This post made me think a lot of Latin American migration, a lot of those migrants that come from the region ACTUALLY come from an oppressed environment, however the right-wing here doesn’t give much empathy, because they’re greedy tribalists.
However when they do come to this country, they are hit by our system, they do not have enough to provide for themselves here, even when they DO have jobs (not very good ones), and the result is detrimental. Liberals want them to come here, but refuse to help them properly as they transition here.
In this country you can have a job, but still not have enough to provide for yourself, and most people here don’t have enough empathy to care, now we have tons of people here living in hotels, and on the street, and STILL working. I know this because I live and lived with people in this situation.
People here really lack empathy for anyone, and it makes me sick.
-
I will be making vlogs and interviews soon
Everyone watch this video:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=196_1434573615
Homo Hubris……
@Isaac
Good work so far. It’s ironic that the Australian national anthem promises:
“For those who’ve come across the seas
We’ve boundless plains to share;
With courage let us all combine
To Advance Australia Fair.”
and then the Zionist Australian government says “NO WAY”. I suggest putting more emphasis on explaining the Zionist angle behind the issue.
See if the ARNM can recruit from these people:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0H0pgjQ7RY
Imagine if we got all of these people to give up their cardboard protest signs and instead get a Firearms Licence and buy firearms, put on uniforms, carry the ARNM flag, and display paramilitary discipline. Nobody is afraid of a cardboard sign. If cardboard signs worked, states would equip their troops with cardboard signs when sending them into combat. They don’t. So why should we?
@Alex
Hispanic immigration into the US is a somewhat different phenomenon, but it’s looking like ZC hell is going to break loose now that the Jewish-owned media has deliberately handed the microphone to Ann Coulter. You guys had better come up with a counterstrategy. As mentioned here:
http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/immigration/
outlaw dual citizenship, outlaw remittances, and I guarantee the non-folkish immigrants will leave by themselves. The main point is to distinguish between folkish and non-folkish immigrants, instead of stereotyping them based on their country of origin. It is your group’s task to convince America of this.
“they do not have enough to provide for themselves here, even when they DO have jobs”
This is because big business doesn’t have the state to compete against. If the state were willing to employ an arbitrary number of people in public works projects for a decent living wage, then private-sector employers would need to offer a better deal than the state does in order to attract employees.
“I will be making vlogs and interviews soon”
Looking forward to it!
I’ve added the reference to the National Anthem, and I also think the beginning of the first verse is quite significant, and will probably become increasingly more so, considering the emblem of our Movement: “Beneath our radiant Southern Cross We’ll toil with hearts and hands; To make this Commonwealth of ours Renowned of all the lands…” I would benefit from any input you might have in helping me to know how to explain the Zionist agenda with Australia.
@Isaac
“To make this Commonwealth of ours”
Good idea, but change the upper-case ‘C’ to a lower-case ‘c’ if possible, so as to indicate we are referring to the general concept of “common weal”:
“The Aryan willingly subordinates his own ego to the common weal and when necessity calls he will even sacrifice his own life for the community.” – Adolf Hitler
rather than to this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations
“I would benefit from any input you might have in helping me to know how to explain the Zionist agenda with Australia.”
This was covered in the original post:
Israeli policies, which Israel wants other countries to adopt so that Israel can no longer be singled out for moral condemnation for such policies
Basically, the more countries practicing policies that mirror Israeli policies, the psychopolitically stronger Israel becomes, because every country that models itself after Israel is therewith crippled of the ability to criticize Israel. (This is the principle of the Rings in LOTR.) Australia is one of many countries being offered this temptation. As you have already pointed out, as Australia succumbs, the temptation becomes more powerful elsewhere also, and vice versa.
Israel was at its weakest in the few short years between the fall of Apartheid South Africa (1994) and 9/11 (2001). If young people back then had known what we know now about Zionism, they would doubtless have immediately started an anti-Zionist movement even bigger, more resolute, more impatient and more militant than the anti-Apartheid movement. But ever since 9/11, Israel has been steadily growing stronger DESPITE increased informational awareness of Jewish cruelty towards non-Jews in the creation and maintenance of Israel, primarily because moral outrage towards Jewish racism is increasingly being replaced by the desire to emulate it, and in so doing normalize it. This was the Zionist plan all along, and it is working.
We need to pull youth attitudes back to how they were in the 90s. This is what Jews really fear. (This is why they assassinated Michael Jackson: because he was the pure 90s spirit incarnate and dangerously still alive in the 21st century, so he had to die in order to preclude the risk that he might rekindle that spirit in hearts and minds all over the planet – as he had been about to attempt in 2009 with his planned concert tour.)
Any genuine immigration reform in the US must simultaneously get rid of NAFTA. The reason there are so many immigrants (especially non-folkish ones who come here for the sole purpose of sending money back to their family in their home country) is because the Mexican economy simply can not compete with imported US goods.
Take this article from 2006 which explains NAFTA’s disastrous effects. It’s only gotten worse since then, especially due to continued US meddling in the Mexican economy and government with things like the “war on drugs”.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0425-30.htm
Of course, what was George Bush’s completely non-empathetic response to the immigration crisis that NAFTA accelerated? Erect a giant wall across the US-Mexico border…
“”they do not have enough to provide for themselves here, even when they DO have jobs”
This is because big business doesn’t have the state to compete against.”
The state also does not take legal action against big businesses when they treat their employees illegally. A big issue with illegal immigrants is that companies intentionally hire or even ‘import’ illegal immigrants to do manual labor such as agricultural jobs. The companies pay them below minimum wage, and give them sub-standard places to live (if any at all). If the immigrants complain, they risk being deported since they are here illegally. The companies will get a slap on the wrist, pay a small fine, and “promise” not to do it again if they are caught…
http://www.voanews.com/content/us-farmers-depend-on-illegal-immigrants-100541644/162082.html
Rightists whine that “immigrants take our jobs”, but even during a time of high unemployment, they aren’t willing to stand behind their words. In 2010, a grassroots initiative called “Take Our Jobs” was started by the United Farm Workers union, and encouraged Americans to work the jobs which illegal immigrants do. Unsurprisingly, very few people took them up on the offer. Stephen Colbert was one of the few high-profile Americans to support this initiative.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kurt-friese/colbert-speaks-for-farmwo_b_632202.html
On a side note–here is the United Farm Workers flag, which was designed by Cesar Chavez in 1962. Does it remind you of anything?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nortenos.jpg
http://270c81.medialib.glogster.com/amontes252/media/8a/8ad6756a4da49f2f0ec6c0e51bb1712328e7eaa8/ufw-flags1.jpg
—–
@AS
I think our window to successfully promote 90s nostalgia is coming up soon. This year I’ve noticed a ton of advertisements and pop culture entertainment which use the theme of 80s nostalgia. I guess this is because it is now 30 years from the midpoint of the 80s, thus it’s a prime opportunity to cast a net over the whole decade.
@AS
“We are not the ones using force. We have never forced a single refugee to travel anywhere they do not want to go. We merely support them being allowed to go where they themselves choose to go. The only people using force here are rightists who prevent refugees from doing this.”
They are not merely traveling. As it was mentioned they move into white slave farms with the intent to live off the enslaved population. What moral difference does it make if I come into your house with a gun to rob you or if I bribe by voting some leftist politician to send cops to do that job for me? Your alleged opposition to the welfare state caused by “other” leftist slave-owners does not change the fact that you support the effects of such policies as an accomplice to these “other” leftist slave-owners. As a double accomplice you also support the beneficiaries of our slavery to move in and live off our slave labor. We exist only to feed the world and our leftist (and increasingly anti-Zionist and religiously anti-Jew) owners are there to make sure that we don’t complain.
http://i.imgur.com/0K3aqjr.png
“You are trying to tell me that, if you were a refugee, you would hope your asylum application is rejected rather than accepted. In that case, why did you apply for asylum in the first place?”
I am not an idiot to hope that leftist and religious regimes around the globe would have employed their native populations to work for me, since Africans, Arabs and Cholos cannot even work enough to feed them selves. I’d be grateful to Africans for not cannibalizing me and grateful to the Arabs for not making the sadistic spectacle out of my death. Come to think of it Israel is probably the safest place outside Europe and Anglosphere for a civilized person.
@Frater Pan
If this site wants immigrants to be slave labourers, working long hours for little pay, then why does it advocate a reduction in working hours, saying things like ‘Aryan imagination (as has been reflected in some sci-fi stories) would have expected at the very least that, as automation increased throughout the millenia, with such developments as irrigation, water wheels, windmills and so on, people would have been able to work progressively fewer hours per day to achieve the same productivity’ and ‘reduction in economic activity would only imply that products are bring produced with greater labour-efficiency than before, or that demand for certain products has decreased. These would then permit either greater leisure, or (better yet) faster depopulation, all without lessening quality of life’?
If it wants immigrants to do jobs that no-one else wants to do under poor working conditions, why does it say ‘Whereas labour surplus forces employees to compete for jobs, which leads to lower wages and worse working conditions, labour scarcity forces employers to compete for employees, which means higher wages and better working conditions, therefore it is our aim to actively promote labour scarcity’? As JJ pointed out, the poor working conditions are not caused by the immigration – it is caused by criminalising immigration and giving immigrants illegal status.
Why does it promote self-sufficient farming as the ideal way of life, if not because it puts people in charge of their own destiny and frees them from slavery? Gadaffi, by the way, gave land, tools and training to anyone who wanted to be a farmer for free, because he shared this view. Jews believe that farming is the lowest way of life.
‘Africans, Arabs and Cholos cannot even work enough to feed them selves’
‘We exist only to feed the world and our leftist (and increasingly anti-Zionist and religiously anti-Jew) owners are there to make sure that we don’t complain.’
Are you serious? You think that Western countries feed the rest of the world? It’s a fact that it’s the other way round. Otherwise, why are most of the fruits and veg you see in the supermarket imported? Why do our economies mostly consist of financial and customer service jobs? Most manufacturing and agriculture takes place outside of the West. Or have you not noticed that most products are stamped ‘made in China’? Yet, according to you, these people are working as slaves for us ONLY IF they come to western countries.
By the way, Africans were feeding themselves perfectly well for centuries before European contact.
‘Until the elected rightists along with the sufferers of disaster-hit countries see some result of leftist work in those countries how are we to take leftists seriously and support whatever agenda they try to force upon the more successful countries?’
The reason it isn’t working is that those countries are not allowed to be self-sufficient, because they are still slave colonies whose purpose is to produce goods and pay tribute to the West. When a country does start to become self-sufficient (e.g. Libya) it is bombed.
‘Seriously, this is such utter bullshit that I wonder if you are just Longinus using a different username’.
With a name like ‘Frater Pan’, I’m more inclined to think he’s an associate of Delenda and OregonCoug.
Good picture of the Pope, though. I think I’ll use that elsewhere.
Started working on the second part: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2afuHGpw92ITVFpbGZwdTZ4UDQ/view?usp=sharing
Denmark is becoming anti-immigrationist now.
@JJ
“A big issue with illegal immigrants is that companies intentionally hire or even ‘import’ illegal immigrants to do manual labor such as agricultural jobs.”
I’m going to watch a CBS documentary about that called “Harvest of Shame”, It is 55 years old, but not much as changed since.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJTVF_dya7E
@LOZ (and all those interested in creating watch groups)
I would recommend kick boxing. It’s relatively easy to learn, effective in real world situations and instruction is easy to find.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-83tS1ZwS9Lo/VX3wkp25Q4I/AAAAAAAAI0Y/CnQ_9Z_7L8s/s1600/gi2.jpg
Just looking at that, I sort of chuckle. We would not push them back (if they attacked us) we would easily smash all of them. Two of them may put up a fight, but, their ‘comrades’ ruin their chances of victory.
Master a simple martial art (like kick boxing) and it’s easier to learn others which will take more time. But, remember most of the people we will face down (at the moment) are reactionary big-mouths, flabby and undisciplined.
@ Pandorastop
I’d been learning some kick boxing in the past although I’m not very good at it right now.
I think this article is great, and is right on point with what I’ve been thinking lately. Empathy is the absolute noble emotion; and with true empathy, one easily finds the noble path. Most commenters on this blog have empathy, but how do we bolster that within our society and local community? I believe we should intentionally start small in our respective Aryanist movements such that we can establish the folkish spirit before we have a such a large following that any feeling of The Folk is forever lost; because without a Folk, there is no Will, without the Will, there is no mission, without the mission, the movement is already lost.
And wow this is my first comment on Aryanism. How exciting!
@Donald Finlayson
Since you are the new leader of the American Aryanist division ( https://noblecitizensparty.wordpress.com/ )
I told you point A.18 is wrong, deporting convicts is wrong, why would you throw garbage in your neighbor’s lawn, even if for some reason they accept it. I don’t want to see American convicts going to other nations and ruining them under the hands of this nation.
I know I told you earlier that you should change that symbol, does anyone have an idea of a good symbol to use, or base off, I really liked my old symbol I made.
Otherwise, I like most of the things you added to my points.
Yes, This is Alex Alexander, I’m changing my name to my full name “Alexander J. Miller”.
@Donald
Welcome! Hashtali told me about you, so I look forward to seeing how you develop the NCP. I have asked JJ to officially supervise you; has he contacted you yet?
As a mild start, I suggest you (or Alex or Chris) jump into the currently ongoing Confederate flag removal debate on the NCP blog, which will hopefully attract initial attention to your blog. I have never understood why the flag (which, after all, was the flag of the enemy of the Union during the Civil War) was allowed to be flown in the first place following the Civil War, other than as yet another deliberate time bomb aimed at dividing the American people in line with the Zionist agenda, as we now see happening before our eyes.
The US has many such time bombs quietly planted all over its culture, which are going to explode one by one and cause utter fragmentation of the country in the near future, unless we locate them and defuse them first.
@AS Thank you, glad to finally jump into the blog. I’ve had trouble with it as I try to stay away from Internet activism in order to focus my energies on the local community, in order to start as a true grassroots movement. I will look into the flag debate and see that the NCP views are expressed thoroughly.
As for JJ, yes he has contacted me and I am awaiting his reply.
@Alexander J. Miller,
Yes I’ve been meaning to fix point A.18, to where deportation of criminals is no longer an option, and capital punishment replaces it. In my opinion, if one is caught for the same crime more than twice (or even once in some occasions like child abuse) they are beyond help.
As for the symbol, any suggestions would be appreciated, but I would like to keep the sword and wheat to symbolize Blood and Soil. All other elements are subject to change.
I plan to be a lot more active on the site ASAP, I am acclimating to a new work schedule. But any help is appreciated with the site, such as suggestions, comments, and admins will be appointed accordingly, upon request and review of individual seeking to administrate the site. Speaking of which, Alex, can you give Isaac Wakeman permission on the site for admin? I have already discussed this with him, and he said he’d be happy to help. I am not near a laptop right now, so that would be appreciated.
@Donald
Ok, I did that, just wait for him to respond.
-
I am going hold back from doing any stuff right now, because I am having suicidal issues, depression, anxiety, and what not.
@Donald – Alex added me now as admin. As my first duty, I put the True Left blog link on the connections page. Please let me know what else you would like me to do for you. I am here to serve your Movement.
@Alex
“I am having suicidal issues, depression, anxiety, and what not.”
You are welcome to send in a contact form any time if you need to talk.
@Isaac
Ossendowski was experiencing technical difficulties adding new authors/admins and setting avatars over at the True Left blog. I was unable to help him because it appeared that there were differences between the True Left blog Dashboard menu and the Aryanism.net Dashboard menu. Please contact Ossendowski to see if you can help with this.
@Isaac Wakeman
Did you ever receive my reply email? Or, are you still thinking about what propaganda would suit Australia’s financial situation?
@ Pandora – Still working on it.
I like posting uplifting stories:
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2015/0624/Seeking-Refuge-Greece-long-hostile-to-migrants-turns-hospitable-under-Syriza
Rightists complain that even sending out rescue ships to save refugees costs money, but in fact it costs remarkably little (Mare Nostrum cost 0.0008% of the EU budget) compared to many other projects that consume public funds. Certainly the SNP sets a good example of how to manage money:
http://www.businessinsider.com/scotland-is-refusing-to-give-the-queen-elizabeth-ii-any-more-money-2015-6
I like posting stories about Scotland in general:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/environment/scotland-s-wind-power-hits-record-levels-1-3813171
http://www.environmental-expert.com/news/scotland-has-opportunity-to-lead-floating-wind-industry-says-new-report-from-the-carbon-trust-540825
Scotland’s attitude towards the ongoing refugee crisis:
http://news.yahoo.com/scottish-leader-unlike-uk-government-welcomes-eu-refugee-151814923.html
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/alex-salmond-slams-uk-government-5694411
@AS I don’t know if you keep up with American News or if you are in the United States at all, but I’d love to hear your opinion of Bernie Sanders. I have mixed feelings about him, as he says he’s anti-corporate sponsorship of politicians, and he has no dual citizenship with Israel; both of these attributes none of the other presidential candidates have, and all are dual citizens with Israel. However, Bernie Sanders is a Jew, but doesn’t appear to act jewishly. So, is he a false hope, or is he actually genuine?
My personal opinion is, any aryanist should vote for Bernie for president, as our movement would have the most hope and breathing room under his presidency; and either way he swings we can use to our advantage. If he is a true lookout for the “working man”, then he should be in full support of our movement and that will be apparent. I say this knowing that our movement isn’t really a “working man movement” but it’s implied in our policies. Now, if he actually is a Jew and ends up acting accordingly, we can use that as ammunition and reinforcement to show how far-gone our system is. The way I see it, it’s a win either way.
@Donald
As you may already know, the only mainstream US politician whom I consider worthy of support is Cynthia McKinney. By comparing Sanders’ resume against McKinney’s, you should be able to see that Sanders does not even come close to the standard set by McKinney.
Also, Sanders isn’t merely an individual who happens to have the misfortune of being of Jewish ancestry, but has stated that he is “proud to be Jewish”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_sanders#Religion
so I am not sure what you mean about him not acting Jewishly.
More importantly, I would consider it a stain on the NCP’s record to have endorsed Sanders, which is what you – as NCP leader – should be worried about. If the NCP is to succeed in future, it must establish its reputation from the very beginning as a party that is consistent and uncompromising.
Of course, in the hypothetical event that Sanders becomes the next US president, then of course I agree with your strategy of then questioning why someone with stated aims such as his would not support NCP ideas. But this still does not mean you need to endorse him beforehand.
By the way, being anti-corporate sponsorship of politicians is not a position we support, as it suggests that democracy is actually good, and that it is merely its degeneration into plutocracy that is bad. Whereas our position is that democracy is bad in itself. Our opposition to democracy is independent of our opposition to capitalism. Capitalism is bad, and democracy is bad, but it is not capitalism that MAKES democracy bad.
@AS
That all makes sense, thank you for the clarification. I suppose I did not perform my due diligence actually looking into Sanders. With corporate endorsement of politicians, I understand that we are anti-democratic and anti-capitalist, and I’m not trying to endorse democracy by supporting the takedown of corporate endorsement of politicians; however, living in a democratic and capitalist system – as well as trying to set up an entryist movement to take them both down – I find that the more capitalism and democracy intertwine, the more powerful they become. In short, stopping corporate endorsement of politicians would definitely make my duties a bit easier.
@AS
Me and Chris agree Sanders is a false-left ZC Jew, promoted by Jewish and Jewish owned media and is a treat, I think he should go on the ZC list, What do you think?
@Finlayson
“In short, stopping corporate endorsement of politicians would definitely make my duties a bit easier.”
Pretty much, But the party should have it’s own campaign about that
Also, It’s important you look well into political individuals before sponsoring them.
@Donald
“trying to set up an entryist movement to take them both down”
Could you elaborate?
@Alex
Sanders is not ZC. (If he were, I am sure Donald would not have felt positively about him.)
I’ve posted the second part now of my Asylum Seekers and Positive Asylum series on my blog, which I’d be glad for any comments, additions, criticisms, encouragements, etc. Here is the link: https://austnatrevolution.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/asylum-seekers-and-our-policy-of-positive-asylum-part-two/
In 2008 and 2012, Ron Paul was set up as being the controlled opposition ‘alternative’ to the status quo Republican/right wing beliefs. This also drew in many young people who were dissatisfied with both parties, hoping that he could change the American political landscape by offering a 3rd position.
I think Bernie Sanders may be the left’s version of this, considering how Obama and Hillary Clinton have recently made many young Democrats/liberals dissapointed by the party’s shift towards Neoconservative views (e.g. support for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya). Don’t bash him too hard though–to my knowledge he’s the first prominent American politican to openly call themselves a socialist since the start of the Red Scare in the 1910-20s. We shouldn’t endorse him as an individual, but we must be aware that if he does well and is able to make ‘socialism’ okay in post-USSR America, this will be a tremendous morale booster for American leftists. If he can do better than Ron Paul did (which I believe he can), hopefully this can inspire American leftists (such as those who supported Occupy Wall Street) to get more serious about changing things.
Sanders has promised to support whoever wins the Democratic nomination should he lose (this will almost certainly be Hillary Clinton). I think this will cause leftists to become quite restless for action (they’re voting for him in the first place because they’re fed up with the “lesser of two evils” two party approach).
This is where the True Left comes in–to ride off of a wave of leftist resurgance that he could start. In my opinion, he doesn’t have any real chance of winning the presidency, and he has to dial back his socialist rhetoric alot so as to not seem too ‘extreme’ by the populace. When he loses and the left inevitably demands someone who isn’t as restrained in their leftist rhetoric as he was, we must be ready to supply them. We have the advantage of people being dissatisfied with two major false leftist ideologies: Communism (the USSR is dead) and liberalism (as embodied by PC). They are looking for something new, and the True Left must give it to them. (We must also keep the leftist momentum going so libertarianism does not gain any more ground.)
In short: we need to be ready to step up and lead the post-Sanders American left to come in the next decade.
I agree with JJ, and that’s where I was going, he just said it more elegantly. Sanders isn’t the prime example of who we want in power, not even a step in the right direction; however I guess it could be a step in the not wrong direction too.